SAS Session 4 Research 1
SAS Session 4 Research 1
Materials:
LESSON TITLE: IMPORTANCE OF EBP AND THE KEY Book, pen and notebook
STEPS IN EBP
Textbook:
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
Barrientos-Tan, C. (2011). A Research Guide in Nursing
Upon completion of this lesson, the nursing student will be Education: Building an Evidence-Based Practice. Pasay
able to: City: Philippines, Visprint Inc.
1. Discuss the importance of Evidence-based Practice
(EBP) in Nursing.
References:
2. Identify the key steps in EBP.
Polit, Denise F. & Beck, Cheryl T. (2012). Nursing
research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing
research (9th ed.), Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.co
m/articles/10.1186/s13643-020-01369-8
The instructor will open a box of rolled papers with students’ assigned numbers. The students whose numbers
were picked by the instructor will answer one of the following questions:
1. What is evidence-based practice? applying or translating research findings in our daily patient
care practices and clinical decision-making
2. What about evidence-based practice in nursing? The conscientious use of current best evidence of
making clinical decision about patient care.
3. What are the sources of evidence for nursing practice? Tradition and authority, clinical experience,
trial and error and intuition, logical reasoning, disciplined research
2. Finding the best evidence to answer the clinical question. This is done by using the PICO Question
format: Patient Population or Problem
Intervention or area of Interest
Comparison intervention or Control group
Outcome
3. Critical appraisal and synthesis of the best evidence or research-based information
1. Asking the
question
4. Integration of
evidence
3. Critical
appraisal and
synthesis of
evidence
Associations of loneliness and social isolation with cardiovascular and metabolic health: a systematic
review and meta-analysis protocol
∙ Adriano Winterton,
∙ Linn Rødevand,
∙ Lars T. Westlye,
∙ Nils Eiel Steen,
∙ Ole A. Andreassen &
∙ Daniel S. Quintana
Abstract
Background
A growing number of studies suggest that social isolation and loneliness are associated with premature mortality
and are more prevalent among people with mental illness than in the general population, outlining many potential
paths to disease still to be elucidated. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the relationship between
loneliness, social isolation, and established cardiovascular/metabolic risk factors and disorders, especially in
severe mental illness, and to account for potential heterogeneity in the literature.
Methods/design
Studies that report measures of loneliness and/or social isolation along with cardiovascular/metabolic risk factors
will be identified. PubMed, EMBASE (through Ovid SP), Scopus, and PsycINFO (through Ovid SP) will be
searched, along with citation lists of retrieved articles and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Grey
literature will be searched using Google Scholar. Data will be extracted from eligible studies for a random effects
meta-analysis. For each study, a summary effect size, heterogeneity, risk of bias, publication bias, and the effect
of categorical and continuous moderator variables will be determined.
Discussion
This proposed systematic review and meta-analysis will identify and synthesise evidence to determine if there is an
association between loneliness, social isolation, and cardiovascular/metabolic risk factors, with a special focus on
severe mental illnesses. The results will help determine links and promising avenues of further research.
(Source: https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-020-01369-8)
Answers:
Step 1: Formulation of a clinical question:
a. Recognizing need for new information
b. Formulating an answerable clinical question Asking well-constructed clinical questions is one of
the key skills necessary for doing EBP. Such questions must be both directly related to patients'
concerns and phrased in a way that directs your search to relevant and clear responses in order to
help both patients and professionals. With its well-built clinical question, the PICOT model makes
the research process easy. It also aids in the development of a search strategy by defining the main
topics that must be included in the article in order to answer the query.
P = Patient, Problem, Population I = Intervention C = Comparison O = Outcome T – Time Target
Step 2: Finding the best evidence:
The PICO Question format is used to accomplish this: Patient Population, Problem Intervention,
Comparison Intervention, or Control Group Outcome. The researchers will conduct a comprehensive
literature search to the association between loneliness and social isolation and recognized
cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors for metabolic disease.
The traditional approach to search for evidence has been using major databases, such as PubMed,
or EMBAS comprehensive sources including millions of relevant articles. Considering the massive
amount of information, a discard periodically reviewing our favorite journals as a means of sourcing
the best available evidence, search loneliness/or social isolation/or social deprivation/or social
alienation/or psychosocial deprivation.
Critical appraisal is the process of carefully and methodically evaluating the results of scientific
study (evidence) to determents trustworthiness, value, and applicability in a specific context. Critical
appraisal investigates the methodology of a research and aspects such as internal validity,
generalizability, and relevance. To significantly alter the best evidence, researchers.
Step 5. Assessment of effectiveness. (NOT AVAILABLE). The abstract presented is a study proposal.
RATIONALIZATION ACTIVITY
The instructor will now rationalize the answers to the students and will encourage them to ask questions and to
discuss among their classmates for (ten) 10 minutes.
Answers:
You will now mark (encircle) the session you have finished today in the tracker below. This is simply a visual to help
you track how much work you have accomplished and how much work there is left to do.
You are done with the session! Let’s track your progress.
Pair up with the person to your right. The instructor will pose the question, “What do you think is the most relevant
research problem in healthcare today that can be addressed by EBP?”. Each pair will share insights and write
their answer on a sheet of paper. You have to articulate your answer as the instructor calls on you to recite.
This document and the information thereon is the property of PHINMA
Education (Department of Nursing) 5 of 5