O R I O N

Reference Guide
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Contents

The Elevator Pitch Completed Flight Tests 44

Orion and the Artemis Missions v
STORRM / STS-134 45
Pad Abort-1 46
Introduction 1 Exploration Flight Test-1 47
Artemis 3 Ascent Abort-2 49

Upcoming Missions 51
Orion 4
Artemis I 52
Launch Abort System 7 Secondary Payloads 54
Crew Module 10 Space Biology Experiments 56
Matroshka AstroRad Radiation Experiment (MARE) 57
European Service Module 14
Commander Moonikin Campos 58
Avionics 17 Callisto 59
Heat Shield 23
Artemis II 60
Crew Systems 25
Artemis III 63
Environmental Control and Life Support Systems 25
Universal Waste Management System 26
Orion Crew Survival System Suits 27 Development and Testing 65

Johnson Space Center 66

Apollo to Artemis 29 Mission Control Center 66
Rapid Prototyping Lab 67
Systems Engineering Simulator/
Partner Programs 33 Reconfigurable Operational Cockpit 68
Orion Mission Simulator 69
Space Launch System 34 Space Vehicle Mockup Facility 70
Exploration Ground Systems 40 Human-In-The Loop Evaluations 71
Crew Module Uprighting System 73

Contents ii
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

White Sands Test Facility 75 Other Facilities Testing 103

European Service Module Propulsion Testing 75 Launch Abort Motor Testing 103
Parachute Testing 108
Langley Research Center 78 Wind Tunnel Testing 112
Water Impact Testing 79
Final Operations and Assembly
Michoud Assembly Facility 82 at Kennedy 116
Crew Module Pressure Vessel 83 Operations and Checkout Building 116
Other Orion Components 85 Multi-Payload Processing Facility 117
Launch Abort System Facility 118
Marshall Space Flight Center 86
Vehicle Assembly Building 119
Orion Work 87

Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility 88

Resources 121
Environmental Testing 89

Acronyms 114
Operations and Checkout Facility,
Kennedy Space Center 91
Environmental Testing 91
Acceptance and Workmanship Testing 93

Lockheed Martin Facilities 96

Structural Test Article 97
Integrated Test Lab 101
Exploration Development Lab 102
STAR Center 102

Contents iii
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Contents iv
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

The Elevator Pitch

Orion and the Artemis Missions

NASA will send astronauts deeper But first, to ensure those missions are
into space than humans have ever safe and successful, later this year
gone—40,000 miles beyond the NASA will launch an uncrewed Orion
Moon and farther than any of the spacecraft atop the most powerful
Apollo missions. In a few short years, rocket ever built, the Space Launch
the first woman and first person of System, to test our capabilities to
color will walk on the surface of the orbit the Moon and return to Earth.
Moon, and begin to establish long-
term exploration for the first time. T h e E l e v

30 seconds
NASA will send astronauts deeper into space than humans have ever gone—40,000 miles beyond the Moon and
farther than any of the Apollo missions. In a few short years, the first woman and first person of color will walk on
the surface of the Moon.

But first, to ensure those missions are safe and successful, later this year NASA will launch an uncrewed Orion
spacecraft atop the most powerful rocket ever built, the Space Launch System, to test our capabilities to orbit the
Moon and return to Earth.

America has entered a new era of exploration. We call it Artemis. It will lead humanity back to the Moon, this time
sustainably, and prepare us for our next giant leap: exploration of Mars.

Orion is the vehicle that will take astronauts on Artemis missions. It’s the only spacecraft capable of human deep
space flight and high-speed return to Earth from the vicinity of the Moon. More than just a crew module, Orion has a
launch abort system to keep astronauts safe if an emergency happens during launch, and a European-built service
module, which is the powerhouse that fuels and propels Orion and keeps astronauts alive with water, oxygen,
power, and temperature control.

The Elevator Pitch > Orion and the Artemis Missions v

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

60 Seconds
You’ve all heard of the Apollo missions when NASA astronauts first stepped on the
Moon. Now, America has entered a new era of exploration. We call it Artemis. It will
lead humanity back to the Moon, this time sustainably, and prepare us for our next
giant leap: exploration of Mars.

Artemis was the twin sister of Apollo and goddess of the Moon in Greek mythology.
Artemis now personifies NASA’s path to the Moon and beyond.

To ensure Artemis missions to deep space are safe and successful, later this year
during the Artemis I uncrewed mission, NASA will launch the Orion spacecraft atop
the most powerful rocket ever built, the Space Launch System, to test our capabilities
to orbit the Moon and return to Earth.

During NASA’s Artemis II mission, NASA will send astronauts to orbit the Moon, testing
out many of the systems Orion will need on future missions.

On Artemis III, the world will witness the first woman and first person of color walking
on and exploring the Moon. Orion will deliver astronauts to a commercially-built
Human Landing System, which will take them to the Moon’s surface.

Orion is the vehicle that will take astronauts on Artemis missions. It’s the only
spacecraft capable of human deep space missions and high-speed return to
Earth from the vicinity of the Moon. Orion is versatile, with a reusable and long-
duration infrastructure that will last multiple decades and support missions of
increasing complexity.

More than just a crew module, Orion has a launch abort system to keep astronauts
safe if an emergency happens during launch, and a European-built service module,
which is the powerhouse that fuels and propels Orion and keeps astronauts alive with
water, oxygen, power, and temperature control.

The Elevator Pitch > Orion and the Artemis Missions vi

 1
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

I ntro d u c tion

1
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Inside the Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building high bay at Kennedy Space Center, NASA’s iconic “worm” logo and European Space
Agency (ESA) logo are added to the aft wall of Orion’s crew module adapter ahead of NASA’s Artemis I mission.

Introduction > Orion and the Artemis Missions 2

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Artemis
Artemis I will send an uncrewed Orion spacecraft atop the Orion spacecraft to deliver crew to the lunar-orbiting
the Space Launch System on a journey beyond the Moon. Gateway, where landers will ferry the astronauts to and
Artemis II will follow, sending a crew around the Moon from the surface of the Moon. NASA and its partners will
and back to Earth. In parallel, NASA and its industry expand the Gateway’s capabilities, allowing for longer
partners will build human lunar landers, the final element stays aboard the orbiting outpost.
of the transportation system needed to return humans
to the surface of the Moon. Artemis III will mark this The Artemis Base Camp, with a surface habitat and both
historic milestone and the beginning of humans living, pressurized and unpressurized rovers, will establish our
learning, and working on the Moon. first foothold on the lunar frontier for extended expedi-
tions. Artemis astronauts will advance new technologies
A coalition of NASA, industry, and partner nations while learning more about the Earth, Moon, and our
will establish an enduring human and robotic presence history in the solar system. Together, the Gateway and
on the Moon in order to meet the agency’s science and the Artemis Base Camp will support mission simulations
exploration goals. The Space Launch System will launch to prepare for the next step – sending astronauts to Mars.

Introduction > Artemis 3

 2
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

O rion

4
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Introduction
The Orion spacecraft is built by NASA and prime technologies for communication and life support. Orion’s
contractor Lockheed Martin. It is currently the only missions will span multiple phases, as part of NASA’s
spacecraft capable of crewed deep space flight and high- framework to build a flexible, reusable, and long-duration
speed return to Earth from the vicinity of the Moon. infrastructure that will last multiple decades and support
missions of increasing complexity.
NASA’s Artemis program is leading the charge to land
the first woman and first person of color on the surface The Moon is the proving ground for sending astronauts
of the Moon, and Orion is the spacecraft that will carry to Mars. It gives us opportunities to test new tools,
astronauts from Earth to the lunar vicinity and return instruments, and equipment to expand humanity into
them back home. our solar system. Mars remains the horizon goal. NASA
expects to take advantage of the unique exploration
Orion is specifically designed to carry astronauts on deep capabilities of both SLS and Orion and emerging
space missions father than ever before. It will provide commercial capabilities to build and support the Gateway.
protection from solar radiation and high-speed entry
into Earth’s atmosphere, as well as advanced and reliable

  The team at Kennedy Space Center prepares the Artemis I Orion for transport from the Launch Abort System Facility to the Vehicle Assembly Building
where it will be stacked atop the Space Launch System on Oct. 18, 2021.

Orion > Introduction 5

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Orion Quick Facts

Performance Height
Number of crew 4 Crew module + 26 ft.
service module
Mission Duration up to 21 days
Orion stack (launch abort 67 ft.
system + crew module
+ service module)
SLS Block 1 Configuration 322 ft.
(Orion + SLS stack)

Trans-Lunar Insertion Mass Post-Trans Lunar Insertion Mass

Artemis I 53,000 lbs. Artemis I 51,500 lbs.

Artemis II 58,000 lbs. Artemis II 57,000 lbs.

Usable Propellant 19,000 lbs.

Total Change in Velocity (∆V) with Fully Loaded

Gross Liftoff Weight Propellant Tank
Artemis I 72,000 lbs. Artemis I 53,000 lbs.

Artemis II 78,000 lbs. Artemis II 58,000 lbs.

Orion Fun Facts

» T he Orion spacecraft is built using 355,056 individual parts:

» 41,858 launch abort system parts
» 209,544 crew module parts
» 103,023 service module parts
» 631 integration parts
» There are 77,150 different types of parts that are used on Orion.

Orion > Orion Quick Facts 6

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Launch Abort System

Orion’s launch abort system (LAS) is designed to carry this point, abort scenarios are handled by the engines in
the crew to safety in the event of an emergency during the service module. Fully jettisoning the entire LAS once
launch or ascent atop the agency’s Space Launch System it’s no longer needed frees Orion of thousands of pounds
(SLS) rocket. It can activate within milliseconds to pull that will make it lighter for its trips into space.
the vehicle to safety and position the crew module for a
safe landing. The tower-like abort structure is specifically built for deep
space missions and to ride on a high-powered rocket. It
The LAS is divided into two parts: the fairing assembly is positioned with its motors on top of the Orion crew
and the launch abort tower. The fairing assembly is a module and designed to pull the crew module away from
shell composed of a lightweight composite material that the rocket, rather than push it away with motors at the
protects the capsule from the heat, wind, and acoustics of base, as some other escape systems are built to do. This
the launch, ascent, and abort environments. The launch design minimizes the mass that aborts in an emergency
abort tower includes the system’s three motors. by leaving the service module behind.

In the case of an emergency, the three solid rocket motors The abort motor generates 400,000 pounds of thrust,
work together to propel the astronauts inside Orion’s crew making Orion’s LAS the highest acceleration escape
module to safety: the abort motor pulls the crew module system ever tested. The puller-style system with the tower
away from the launch vehicle; the attitude control motor above the spacecraft is the first of its kind capable of
steers and orients the capsule; then the jettison motor controlled orientation after separating from the rocket. In
ignites to separate the LAS from the crew module prior to the event of an abort, the LAS can outrun even the SLS
parachute deployment. rocket, which generates 8.8 million pounds of thrust.

During a normal launch, once the SLS clears most of the The LAS development is managed by NASA’s Langley
atmosphere, the job of the LAS is done. The jettison motor Research Center and Marshall Space Flight Center.
fires to separate the LAS from the spacecraft, and from

 In this view from above inside the Launch Abort System Facility at
NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, work takes place on Aug. 21,
2019 to integrate segments of the launch abort system for Artemis I.

Orion > Launch Abort System 7

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Launch Abort System Quick Facts

Abort Motor Weight 7,600 lbs.
Height 50 ft. with ogive panels includes 4,700 lbs. propellant
44 ft. without ogive panels 400,000 lbs. thrust
Diameter 3 ft. tower Altitude Motor Weight 1,700 lbs.
17 ft. at base includes 650 lbs. propellant
7,000 lbs. thrust
Liftoff Weight 17,000 lbs. Jettison Motor Weight 900 lbs.
Propellant 5,700 lbs. includes 350 lbs. propellant
Weight 40,000 lbs. thrust

  The Orion launch abort system and crew module attached to the abort test booster are readied for flight ahead of the Ascent Abort-2 flight test on
July 2 ,2019. The successful test demonstrated the ability to carry the crew to safety in case of a mishap during ascent.

Orion > Launch Abort System Quick Facts 8

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Launch Abort System Fun Facts

» The abort motor on Orion’s launch abort system (L AS) generates 400,000 pounds of thrust in a matter of millisec-
onds to quickly propel the crew module away from danger.
» From a launch pad abort, Orion’s launch abort system accelerates from 0 to 500 mph in 2 seconds.
» This is nearly 6 times faster than the average roller coaster.
» A 2014 Corvette Stingray goes 0 to 60 mph in 3.8 seconds. It would take the Corvette 32 seconds to get to
500 mph, which is impossible, since it cannot go that fast.
» At take-off, a Boeing 747 is going approximately 225 mph and requires at least 10 seconds to get to that
speed – its fastest cruising speed is 570 mph.
» This is nearly 3 times faster than the speed of an aircraft carrier catapult (a catapult can loft 45,000 pounds
from 0 to 165 mph in 2 seconds).
» The L AS solid rocket motors use propellant that burns at a temperature of 4,456°F, nearly half the temperature
on the surface of the Sun. While that temperature is hot enough to boil steel, special insulation inside the motor
protects the steel case so well that the outside of the case reaches only about 130°F and the crew
cabin remains cool.
» The motors of the L AS use a propellant is a solid rubberlike substance of fuel and oxidizer that has the consistency
of a hard rubber eraser.
» Combustion gases exiting the abort motor nozzles travel at a speed of 2,600 mph, more than 3 times the speed of
sound and 2 times the speed of a bullet shot from a rifle.
» If the abort motor energy could be converted to electric power, it would be enough to power 13,000 houses for
an entire day.

 Teams with NASA’s Exploration Ground Systems (EGS) and contractor Jacobs
integrate the launch abort system (LAS) with the Orion spacecraft inside the Launch
Abort System Facility at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida on July 23, 2021.

Orion > Launch Abort System 9

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  The NASA insignia, also called the “meatball,” and the American Flag are applied to the Orion crew module back shell for the Artemis I mission on
Oct. 28, 2020, inside the Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

Crew Module
The crew module is the pressurized part of the Orion healthy and comfortable on long missions. A cockpit with
spacecraft, sometimes referred to as the capsule, where crew glass displays allows full control of Orion by the crew. The
will live and work on their journey to the Moon and back. sealed capsule also provides radiation protection needed
The crew module can accommodate four crew members to safeguard crew and spacecraft systems from cosmic and
for up to 21 days, and provides a safe habitat through solar radiation seen in deep space, and micrometeoroid
launch, on-orbit operations, landing, and recovery. The protection from items found in the space environment.
crew module contains advances in life support, avionics,
power systems, and advanced manufacturing techniques, On missions to the Moon, the crew module will be
and is the only portion of Orion that returns to Earth at home to the astronauts. Water tanks and a dispenser
the end of flights. provide drinking water and a simple way to rehydrate
and warm food. The crew module’s waste management
Inside the crew module, environmental control and life system, or lavatory, is designed for multi-week missions,
support systems maintain cabin temperature, pressure, privately accommodating both sexes while in zero gravity.
humidity, oxygen, and carbon dioxide levels, keeping crew Astronauts will also have to exercise, and Orion’s crew

Orion > Crew Module 10

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

module has a built-in exercise device that provides both space, such as food, medical kits, emergency equipment
aerobic and strength training. The environmental control such as masks and fire extinguisher, sleeping bags, and
system even removes excess heat, humidity, and odor the pressure suits worn for launch and return to Earth are
during exercise. stored in lockers located here.

The underlying structure of the crew module is called Covering the pressure vessel is the protective cover on the
the pressure vessel. The pressure vessel consists of seven sides of the crew module known as the backshell, made
large aluminum alloy pieces that are joined together using up of 1,300 thermal protection system tiles. The tiles are
friction-stir welding to produce a strong, yet light-weight, made of a silica fiber material similar to those used for
air-tight capsule. The seven major structural pieces include more than 30 years on the space shuttle. The tiles will
the barrel, tunnel, forward and aft bulkheads, and three protect the spacecraft from both the coldness of space and
cone panels. Original designs had 33 welded pieces, but the extreme heat of entry into Earth’s atmosphere.
the Artemis I crew module and beyond have seven welded
pieces, improving manufacturability and saving more The bottom of the Orion capsule, which will be pointed
than 700 pounds of excess weight. into the heat as Orion returns to Earth, is covered by the
world’s largest ablative heat shield, measuring 16.5 feet in
The floor structure where the crew seats are attached and diameter. The heat shield will protect Orion as it enters
where the crew stowage lockers are located is called the Earth’s atmosphere travelling about 25,000 mph and
backbone assembly, which is a nine-piece bolted structure endure temperatures of nearly 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit
of crisscrossing beams. The backbone, made of aluminum, — about as half as hot as the Sun. The outer surface of
also provides additional structural support for the crew the heat shield is made of 186 billets, or blocks, of an
module. Most of the equipment the crew needs to live in ablative material called Avcoat, a reformulated version of

  The Orion crew module for Artemis I is lifted by crane on July 16, 2019, in the high bay inside the Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building high
bay at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

Orion > Crew Module 11

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

the material used on the Apollo capsules. The Avcoat is The capsule also houses Orion’s parachute system that
bonded to a titanium skeleton and composite skin that ensures a safe landing for astronauts returning from deep
gives the shield its shape and provide structural support for space missions to Earth. The system includes a series of 11
the crew module during descent and splashdown. During parachutes that are deployed in a sequence to slow down
descent, the Avcoat ablates, or burns off in a controlled the module from speeds exceeding 25,000 mph to 20 mph
fashion, transporting heat away from Orion. or less and provide a safe speed for splashdown at landing.

The crew module includes a number of mechanisms that Crew modules for Artemis missions are built by prime
provide the way to enter and leave the module through contractor Lockheed Martin, and primary structure
hatches. It also includes mechanicsm that provide docking welding takes place at NASA’s Michoud Assembly Facility
capability for on-orbit activities with other spacecraft, in New Orleans. Orion piece parts and components are
as well as as mechanisms for the separation or jettison provided by hundreds of suppliers across the nation, and
functions from other parts of Orion when the crew parts are delivered to the assembly facility located at the
module needs to separate for entry and landing. Kennedy Space Center. Orion is then outfitted with all
these parts and internal components, assembled by teams
While the service module functions as the main at Kennedy, then transferred to the Exploration Ground
propulsion system for Orion, the crew module has a Systems (EGS) team which performs final preparations on
propulsion system comprised of 12 small engines called the spacecraft for launch.
reaction control system (RCS) thrusters that provide full
control of module translation and rotation both on orbit
and during entry. When the crew module separates from
the service module for entry into Earth’s atmosphere, the
12 RCS thrusters control the spacecraft’s return.

Crew Module
Quick Facts
Height 11 ft.

Diameter 16.5 ft.

Habitable Volume 316 cu. ft.

Pressurized Volume 220 lbs

Lunar Payload Return 220 lbs.

Artemis I Liftoff Weight 20,500 lbs.

Artemis II Liftoff Weight 22,900 lbs.

Artemis I Landing Weight 18,200 lbs.

Artemis II Landing Weight 20,500 lbs.

Engines/Thrusters 12 Reaction Control System (RCS)

  The Orion crew module for Artemis I undergoes a direct field acoustics
Thrusters
test, where it was exposed to maximum acoustic levels that the vehicle will
experience in space. 160 lbs. of each thrust

Orion > Crew Module 12

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Crew Module Fun Facts

» From an anthropomorphic standpoint, Orion is designed to accommodate 99 percent of the human population,
which is a larger range than every other NASA or Department of Defense project past, present, or future. The
spacecraft can accommodate astronauts as small as a 4-foot-10-inch tall female and as tall as a 6-foot-5-inch
male.
» Orion’s crew module provides about 30 percent more cubic volume of space than the Apollo capsule.
» Orion can sustain a crew of four for up to 21 days in orbit during its initial missions to low lunar orbit. Missions
to more distant destinations may have a crew of 2 to allow more room for consumables onboard.
» Orion can orbit the Moon autonomously without any crew onboard for over six months.

  The Artemis I Orion pressure vessel, which is the underlying structure of the crew module, arrived at the Neil Armstrong Operations & Checkout Building
at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida in early February 2016 and was maneuvered into a work stand.

Orion > Crew Module 13

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

The Orion crew and service module stack for

Artemis I is lifted out of the Final Assembly and Test
(FAST) cell inside the Neil Armstrong Operations &
Checkout Building at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center
in Florida.

European Service Module

Orion’s European Service Module is the powerhouse that jettisoned, and the solar arrays unfold to span about
fuels and propels the Orion spacecraft in space. Located 62 feet. Following launch, Orion’s service module will
below the crew module, it provides critical functions propel the spacecraft on its mission and help it return
including propulsion, thermal control, and electrical to Earth, detaching before the crew module enters
power generated by solar arrays. The service module will Earth’s atmosphere.
also provide life support systems including water, oxygen,
and nitrogen for the crew. In addition to its function as To push Orion to its destination, the service module is
the main propulsion system for Orion, it is responsible for equipped with a total of 33 engines: one main engine
orbital maneuvering and position control. The cylindrical (NASA-provided refurbished Orbital Maneuvering
module is unpressurised and about 13 feet high, including System engine (OMS-E); eight auxiliary engines (NASA-
the main engine and tanks for gas and propellant, provided Aerojet R4D-11), and 24 reaction control
and is designed for long duration missions to deep thrusters (ESA-provided engines that are the same model
space destinations. as those used on the Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV).
These three types of engines provide the propulsion for
During launch, the service module fits into a 17-foot- lunar orbit injection and return to Earth, as well as attitude
diameter housing, surrounded by three spacecraft adapter control for the crew module. The propulsion system can
jettison fairing panels. The panels offer protection from also be used, during some late phases of the launch, for
harsh environments such as heat, wind, and acoustics crew safeguard during potential abort scenarios.
during launch. Once Orion is above the atmosphere,
the fairing panels surrounding the service module are

Orion > European Service Module 14

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Built by Thales Alenia Space in Italy, the primary structure A consumable storage system provides potable water,
of the service module is the backbone of the entire vehicle. nitrogen, and oxygen to the crew module. Potable water is
Like the chassis of a car, the structure holds everything provided by the water delivery system and stored in four
together. It is covered with Kevlar to absorb shocks from metal bellow tanks, covering usable water needs of the
micrometeorites and debris impacts. crew for the duration of the mission. Oxygen and nitrogen
are provided by the gas delivery system and stored in
During launch, the service module is held in place by the four tanks, the allocation of the tank to each gas being
held in place by the spacecraft adapter. The spacecraft mission dependent.
adapter connects to the Orion stage adapter that attaches
Orion to the SLS rocket. The service module is built by main contractor Airbus
under a contract for ESA (European Space Agency),
A crew module adapter connects the capsule to the service with many companies across 10 European countries as
module. The crew module adapter houses electronic well as the United States supplying components. Airbus
equipment for communications, power, and control, and has drawn on its experience as prime contractor for the
includes an umbilical connector that bridges the electrical, ATV, which provided supplies to the International Space
data, and fluid systems between the main modules. Station. The final product is assembled in Europe before
being shipped to NASA’s Kennedy Space Center, where it
Computers control all aspects of the service module. is integrated with the rest of the Orion spacecraft.
Avionics manage the powered equipment and the data
exchange services based on instructions received from
Orion’s flight computers in the crew module. Nearly seven
miles of cables send commands and receive information
from sensors.

Service Module
The service module’s electrical power system provides
the power for the entire spacecraft. The system manages

Quick Facts
the power generated by the four solar array wings of the
module. Each wing is made of three panels, and each panel
is approximately 6.5 x 6.5 feet (2 x 2 meters). The total
length of each wing is nearly 23 feet (7 meters). There are Length 15.7 ft.
a total of 15,000 gallium arsenide cells on the four arrays
Diameter 16.5 ft.
used to convert light into electricity, and the arrays can turn
on two axes to remain aligned with the Sun for maximum Artemis I Weight 33,700 lbs.
power. A power control and distribution unit provides the Artemis II Weight 34,400 lbs.
power interface between the service module and the crew
module adapter, distributes electrical power to the service Engine/Thrusters 1 Orbital Maneuvering System;
6,000 lbs. of thrust
module’s electrical equipment, and protects the power lines.
The module’s thermal control system includes radiators 8 Auxiliary Engines; 110 lbs. of each thrust
and heat exchangers to keep the astronauts and equipment 24 Reaction Control System Thrusters; 50 lbs.
at a comfortable temperature. The thermal control system of thrust each
includes an active portion, which transfers the heat of Solar Arrays 4 arrays
the entire vehicle to the service module radiators, and a 15,000 solar cells
passive portion, which protects the module from internal 62 ft. when deployed
and external thermal environments. 11kW regenerable electrical power

Orion > European Service Module 15

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

The European Service Module that will be used on Artemis II, the first Artemis mission with crew, is shown in assembly at Airbus in Bremen, Germany
on July 1, 2019.

Service Module Fun Facts

» The European Service Module is comprised of more than 20,000 parts and components that must fit together perfectly
and perform reliably.
» The computer in Orion’s service module controls 33 engines and reads over 100 pressure and temperature sensors.
» 1,000 sensors collected data on Orion’s service module as it was vigorously shaken on a vibration table at NASA Glenn
Research Center’s Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility in Sandusky, Ohio. This testing simulated how Orion’s structure flexed
and stood up to 35 tons of spacecraft weight during a launch.
» Each of Orion’s four solar array wings are made of three panels that provide enough electricity to power two
three-bedroom homes.
» In space, Orion’s orbital maneuvering system engine, called the OMS-e, produces 6,000 pounds, or 26.7 kN, of thrust.
Here on Earth, if you were to strap an OMS-e to a car, it would accelerate from 0-60 mph in approximately 2.7 seconds,
ranking it among the world’s top 10 fastest production cars.
» Orion’s service module main engine for Artemis I has been to space 19 times on three different space shuttles.

Orion > European Service Module 16

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Avionics
The Orion spacecraft houses a number of state-of-the- commands to the vehicle. The FCM then resets itself,
art avionics units to handle data generated by on-board listens to the other FCMs to relearn where the vehicle is
systems, control the various functions of the spacecraft, and what is happening, and then rejoins the other FCMs
execute commands sent from Earth or by the crew, and in controlling the vehicle – all within 22 seconds. Having
return systems telemetry for insight into systems status. four FCMs on the vehicle allows the flight software to
continue firing thrusters and flying as Orion transitions
The avionics and other electronics used in Orion are almost through the challenging radiation environment of the
entirely driven by software and commercial processor Van Allen belts, since the odds of all four FCMs being
technologies that have been ruggedized to endure extreme upset in the same 22 seconds are extremely low.
radiation and temperature fluctuations. Orion’s updated
avionics also can handle the severe acoustic and vibration The four redundant FCMs greatly improve system
environments associated with launch, orbit, a fiery entry reliability, yet Orion adds another measure of backup
into Earth’s atmosphere, and a saltwater landing. capability with the addition of a completely different
computer, capable of running different code should it
Orion’s avionics system consists of seven main subsystems: ever be needed. In the unlikely event that something
command and data handling; guidance, navigation goes wrong with the primary flight computers on Orion,
and control (GN&C); communications and tracking; a dissimilar processing platform with dissimilar flight
displays and controls; instrumentation; power; and software is hosted on the vision processing unit (VPU).
flight software (FSW). This dissimilar computer and software provide a backup
function to the redundant FCMs during critical phases of
flight, with a focus on crew survival and return functions
Command and Data Handling in the highly unlikely scenario where anything renders all
the FCMs ineffective. The VPU also provides a place to
The brains of the Orion spacecraft consist of two store data during times when Orion can’t communicate
vehicle management computers (VMC), manufactured with the ground.
by Honeywell. A VMC is a robust system that delivers
more computing power to the Orion spacecraft than any Eight power and data units (PDU) connect the flight
previous crewed spacecraft. computers and the software to the rest of Orion. These
PDUs control the power to every component on the
Each of the two VMCs is made up of two flight computer vehicle and they control effectors such as valves, thrusters,
modules (FCM), which are in charge of executing flight and heaters. All sensor data such as temperature and
control and other vehicle software, a display control pressure are routed through the PDUs as well. The
module for astronaut displays, and a communication PDUs also play a critical role in communicating with the
control module that allows commands and data to flow rocket that launches Orion and puts it on its trajectory
between Orion and mission control. The FCMs provide a to the Moon.
high integrity platform to house software applications and
have sufficient processing power to perform command and Orion’s onboard data network is a triple redundant
control of Orion. Each of the four FCMs are internally network that allows the FCMs to communicate with
redundant and continually check all operations to be sure all of the other avionic components on Orion. It uses a
they match. If the FCMs ever detect a difference between networking technology called Time-Triggered Gigabit
them, due to a hardware failure or a radiation upset, the Ethernet (TT-GbE) that is capable of moving data at a
different FCM ‘fails silent’ by stopping all outputs so rate 1,000 times faster than systems used on the shuttle
that a potentially corrupted FCM doesn’t issue critical and space station. The TT-Gbe allows NASA engineers

Orion > Avionics 17

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

to categorize different types of data and prioritize how The software must also execute complex guidance and
it should travel through the onboard network. Time- navigation algorithms while controlling highly dynamic
critical data relating to vital systems like navigation and configurations during entry, ascent aborts, and orbital
life support, called time-triggered data, has guaranteed maneuvers. The resulting range of algorithm types drives
bandwidth and message timing to ensure it is always a multi-rate architecture to meet central processing unit
delivered exactly on time. Data that is critical for delivery usage allocations.
but not timing, such as file transfers, is called rate-
constrained data and is sent immediately whenever time- The onboard navigation system for Orion is comprised
triggered data is not present. Data used for non-critical of a number of redundant sensors for measuring Orion’s
tasks such as crew videoconferencing is delivered over position (where Orion is in space) and attitude (what
the remaining bandwidth. The technology means that direction the spacecraft is pointed). Like most systems
critical data and non-essential data can travel safely over on the spacecraft, there are usually at least two of each
a single network onboard a spacecraft for the first time. It sensor to increase reliability of the overall system. Because
is built upon a reliable commercial data bus that has been the spacecraft operates in the atmosphere during ascent
hardened to be resilient to space radiation and proven on and entry, in low-Earth orbit, and near the Moon, several
the Orion Exploration Flight Test-1 (EFT-1). The data different types of sensors are needed. These include:
system interfaces with all components, including the
European Service Module, through radiation hardened Orion Inertial Measurement Units (OIMU): Each
network switches. OIMU contains three rate gyros which measure vehicle
body rotation rates and three accelerometers to measure
vehicle body accelerations. This inertial data is used by
Guidance, Navigation, the VMC for onboard navigation to compute spacecraft
and Control position, velocity, and attitude.

The guidance, navigation, and control (GN&C) system Global Positioning System (GPS) Receivers: Similar to
is responsible for always knowing where the spacecraft is ground-based GPS, except these are capable of operating
and where it is going, and controls the propulsion system at the very high velocities of spaceflight. The GPS sensor
to keep Orion pointed in the proper direction and on the system provides position and velocity updates during
correct trajectory. low-Earth orbit operations, ascent, and entry. Because the
GPS satellites point toward the Earth, GPS can’t be used
At the center of this system is the GN&C flight software out near the Moon. GPS-based altitude values are the
(FSW) that executes on the VMCs. This software receives primary triggers for entry events.
inputs from navigation sensors and pilot controls and
commands the appropriate effectors on the crew module, Deep Space Network (DSN): This is not an on-board
service module, and launch abort system to accomplish system, but instead a ground-based network of large
mission objectives. The Orion GN&C software operates tracking dishes all around the world that together can
across a variety of mission phases, including pre-launch, determine Orion’s location while it is in deep space
ascent, Earth orbit, transit to and from the Moon, loiter, outside the range of GPS. It relies on very sensitive timing
rendezvous, docking, entry, and various abort scenarios. of measurements of communication signals that pass
The software must operate in both manual and automated between Orion and the dishes on the ground.
modes, and must handle commands from the crew and
the ground. Barometric Altimeter (BALT) Assembly: By sensing
the atmospheric air pressure outside the spacecraft
during ascent and entry, these assemblies can measure
Orion’s altitude. They provide a back-up altitude value for
parachute and other deployments during entry.

Orion > Avionics 18

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  A Jena-Optronik technician in Jena, Germany, works on a star tracker, a sensitive camera that will take pictures of the star field around the Orion
spacecraft. By comparing the pictures to its built-in map of stars, the star tracker can determine which way Orion is oriented.

Star Trackers (STR): The star tracker operates like Communications and Tracking
a camera but is very sensitive and takes pictures only
of stars. By comparing the pictures to a known star Orion uses a high-speed communications system,
catalog, the sensor determines spacecraft attitude during employing four phased array antennas on the crew module
orbital operations. and two phased array antennas on the service module.
Phased array antennas allow signals to be controlled and
Optical Navigation (OpNav) Camera: The OpNav directed without requiring any physical movement of the
camera takes images of the Moon and the Earth. By antenna. These will be used for video, data, and voice
looking at the size and position of these objects in the communications with the spacecraft, as well as command
picture, OpNav can determine Orion’s range and bearing uplink and telemetry downlink to ground stations,
to that object. OpNav is part of the Orion emergency NASA’s Tracking and Data Relay Satellite Systems, and
return system to autonomouslyoperate the vehicle in the NASA’s Deep Space Network after leaving Earth’s orbit.
event of lost communication with Earth. The crew will also have an emergency radio system to allow
voice communications anytime during a mission if the
Sun Sensors: The Sun sensors are located on the ESA- main communications system were to fail. After landing,
provided service module and are used to determine the crew has search and rescue radios as well as satellite
the direction of the Sun during emergency safe mode. phones for communication with recovery forces. There is
Knowing where the Sun is ensures that Orion can point its also an audio system on board that allows astronauts to
solar arrays in the right direction to keep power flowing. speak with each other and with the ground while they are
wearing spacesuits.

Orion also has a number of cameras inside and outside

of the vehicle to help the crew with tasks like docking,
interviews and public outreach events, medical
conferences, and to help gather engineering pictures and
video to make sure the spacecraft is performing properly.

Orion > Avionics 19

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Each of the solar array wings has a wireless camera near The Orion displays and controls are designed for an
the tip that can be pointed to inspect the exterior of intensive amount of crew interaction both in nominal and
the spacecraft and to provide some views that are out off-nominal scenarios. Electronic procedures have been
of this world. developed for Orion that allow direct interaction with the
display formats enabling reduced workload on the crew.
The electronic procedures efficiently step the crew through
Displays and Controls planned tasks and reduce crew workload by highlighting
various telemetry on a display format or queuing up
The Orion displays and control equipment is the crew commands. Additionally, the electronic procedures have
interface to the Orion systems. The displays and controls built in links to the onboard caution and warning system
consist of three display units, seven switch interface panels, which alert the crew when onboard faults and anomalies
two rotational hand controllers, two translational hand occur. The electronic procedures link provides the ability
controllers, and two cursor control devices. The switch for the crew to bring up electronic procedures which
panels and hand controllers’ hardware interfaces through communicate the urgent actions the crew need to take in
serial interfaces to the power and data units, then via the order to address the caution and warning condition.
onboard data network to either flight control modules or
the display units for processing. The display units utilize a
variety of display formats to provide data to the crew for
awareness and action when necessary.

  Spacesuit engineers demonstrate how four crew members would be arranged for launch inside the Orion spacecraft, using a mockup of the vehicle at
Johnson Space Center in Houston.

Orion > Avionics 20

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Power Instrumentation
The Orion power system is capable of generating and Accomplishing flight test objectives for the flight tests
supplying all of the power that is required for its on-orbit requires a dedicated instrumentation system that will
operations. The four Orion solar arrays are located on the measure dynamic response of all Orion subsystem
European Service Module, generate about 11 kilowatts performance during critical phases of the Artemis
of power and spread 62 feet when extended. Orion’s four missions. These include structural response and thermal
main batteries are located on the crew module and use protection system response during entry into Earth’s
small cell packaging technology to ensure crew safety atmosphere. A suite of avionics data acquisition system
while providing 120 volts of power to the many systems electronics along with associated cabling supports the
on Orion. The batteries are fully charged before launch large number of channels needed.
to operate the spacecraft until the solar arrays can be
deployed once in orbit. The batteries also operate the The developmental flight instrumentation (DFI) data
spacecraft when the solar arrays cannot be pointed at the system is required to measure unique subsystems
Sun or in the shadow of the Earth or the Moon. The solar performance during all phases of flight from launch,
arrays are jettisoned right before entering the Earth’s cruise, and return to Earth. The DFI diagnostic
atmosphere, so the batteries also provide all the power instrumentation system is required to measure the
needed to keep the astronauts safe for return to Earth response of newly designed components and structures to
and up to 24 hours after splashdown. Power is transferred verify and validate engineering models that will be used
between the solar arrays and batteries and to the end item to predict their future performance.
loads via the power and data units.
The architecture of the DFI system is very robust and
relies on proven hardware and software to deliver high
reliability. The central components are data acquisition
units which have two interfaces: one for the sensor
interface, and one for the control interface. The sensor
interface communicates with the temperature, strain,
accelerometers, and acoustic sensors. The control
interface in turn communicates with the power, control,
recording, telemetry, and time-sync hardware. The
sensors can be changed between flights to allow engineers
to make adjustments based on what is learned about a
previous flight.

Orion > Avionics 21

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  In preparation for installation on the Artemis I spacecraft, technicians extend one of the Artemis I solar array wings for inspection inside the Neil
Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building high bay at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Sept. 10, 2020, to confirm that it unfurled properly
and all of the mechanisms functioned as expected.

Avionics Fun Facts

» The Orion S-Band communications system provides functionality of 4 radios in one, allowing
communication with:
» Multiple space vehicles
» NASA’s Near Space Network Direct-To-Earth Services
» NASA’s Tracking and Data Relay Satellite (TDRS) Services
» NASA’s Deep Space Network (DSN)
» Any combination of the above
» Orion’s glass cockpit provides fully redundant crew controls and displays with over 60 graphical user interface,
or GUI formats and interactive electronic procedures - a first in spacecraft history. Instead of relying on physical
switches distributed across a vast flight deck, an astronaut will be able to control all of the vehicle systems
from a single operator station using ‘virtual’ switches displayed on GUIs.
» Compared to Apollo’s single flight computer, Orion has two simultaneously operating redundant flight computers.
Each of these includes two redundant computer modules, giving it a total of four redundant systems.
» One of Orion’s two redundant computers is only three quarters the weight of the sole computer aboard Apollo,
has 128,000 times more memory and is 20,000 times faster.

Orion > Avionics 22

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Heat Shield
The heat shield is one of the most critical elements of the blocks are properly bonded and will perform as expected
Orion spacecraft, protecting Orion and the astronauts as when they are exposed to the extreme temperatures during
they enter Earth’s atmosphere travelling about 25,000 the mission.
mph and reaching temperatures of nearly 5,000 degrees
Fahrenheit — about as half as hot as the Sun. The heat shield is then given a coat of white epoxy paint.
Aluminized tape is applied after the painted surface
Measuring 16.5 feet in diameter, it’s the largest ablative heat dries to dissipate electrical surface charges and maintain
shield in the world. The outer surface is made of blocks of acceptable temperatures. Once all testing has been
an ablative material called Avcoat, a reformulated version completed, the heat shield is bolted to the crew module.
of the material used on the Apollo capsules. During
descent, the Avcoat ablates, or burns off in a controlled The Orion heat shield was redesigned from a single
fashion, transporting heat away from Orion. piece system to individual blocks of material following
Exploration Flight Test-1 in 2014. Before the time-saving
The Avcoat is first made into large blocks at NASA’s block system was used, a fiberglass-phenolic honeycomb
Michoud Assembly Facility, then shipped to NASA’s structure was bonded to the structure’s skin. Then each
Kennedy Space Center in Florida and machined into 186 of the 320,000 tiny honeycomb cells were individually
unique shapes before being applied onto the heat shield’s filled with Avcoat by hand, inspected by X-ray, cured in
underlying titanium skeleton and carbon fiber skin. a large oven, and robotically machined to meet precise
Engineers conduct non-destructive evaluations to look thickness requirements.
for voids in the bond lines, as well as measure the steps
and gaps between the blocks. The gaps are filled with an This new design introduced several considerations that
adhesive material and then reassessed. prompted further testing for risk reduction. Engineers
performed more than 30 tests across the United States
After the thermal protection system has been applied on the new design to investigate the effects of the block
and inspected, engineers and technicians put the heat structure that could disrupt the smooth airflow and cause
shield through a thermal cycle test in the high bay of the localized heating spots. Understanding both effects is
Operations and Checkout (O&C) Building at Kennedy. critical to confirm the heat shield will thermally protect
The thermal cycle test ensures the thermal protection the astronauts during entry into Earth’s atmosphere.

 Inside the Neil Armstrong

Operations and Checkout Building
high bay at NASA’s Kennedy Space
Center in Florida, technicians with
ASRC Federal inspect AVCOAT
block bonding on the Artemis II
heat shield on July 2, 2020.

Orion > Heat Shield 23

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

The Avcoat material was tested at the NASA Ames Research Backshell panels
Center Arc Jet Complex and at the NASA Johnson Space
Center’s Atmospheric Reentry Materials and Structures Orion’s backshell panels and forward bay cover will also
Evaluation Facility through its closing in 2014. The Arc provide protection from the excessive heat of entry into
Jet facilities were used to simulate the heating and airflow Earth’s atmosphere, as well as the micro-meteoroid debris
conditions that occur during entry. Thermal testing also which could be encountered during missions. There are
has been performed at Johnson Space Center’s Radiant 1,300 thermal protection system tiles made of a silica fiber
Heat Test Facility (RHTF) periodically from the onset of material called AETB-8 (Alumina Enhanced Thermal
the Orion Program up until March 2021. During these Barrier). The tiles are similar to those used for more than
tests, the Avcoat surface reached temperatures of over 30 years on the space shuttle, and incorporate a stronger
3,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Heat shield testing concluded coating called “toughened uni-piece fibrous insulation,”
in March 2019 at NASA’s Langley Research Center with or TUFI coating, which was used toward the end of the
a six-inch Orion heat shield model in the 20-inch Mach Space Shuttle Program. On average, the tiles are 8-inches
6 wind tunnel. The six-inch Orion heat shield model was by 8-inches and many are standard in size allowing them
machined to represent small-scale features, including to have the same dimensions with the same part number.
the patterns expected as the heat shield ablates during
return to Earth.

  Heat shield back shell panels are prefitted on the

Orion spacecraft inside the Neil Armstrong Operations
and Checkout Building high bay at NASA’s Kennedy Space
Center in Florida on Feb. 1, 2018.

Heat Shield Fun Facts

» During return to Earth from a mission to the Moon, Orion and its heat shield must protect the vehicle and crew
from external temperatures up to around 5,000°F.
» This is hotter than the melting point for titanium, which is about 3,000°F.
» It’s also about half the surface temperature of the Sun, which is about 10,000°F.
» While the outside temperatures during entry into Earth’s atmosphere will reach 5,000°F, inside the spacecraft it
will be in the mid-70s – hotter than molten lava on the outside and cool as a cucumber on the inside.
» The heat shield on the bottom of the crew module is 16.5 feet wide. It is the largest ablative heat shield in the
world. Orion’s thermal protection system is one of the most important parts of the spacecraft and is responsible
for protecting the astronauts during their return.

Orion > Heat Shield 24

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Crew Systems
Orion has been specially designed and tested to make sure dioxide and humidity. When exposed to the vacuum
astronauts can live and work safely in the capsule during of space, the carbon dioxide and humidity are vented
multi-week Artemis missions. Countless details inside and overboard, and the system is regenerated back to a clean
outside the spacecraft are meticulously thought through state to return to cleaning the cabin air. On other human
to ensure that astronauts are protected during anything spacecraft such as the space shuttle, a method using
they may encounter. From life support to spacesuits to expendable chemicals was used to remove carbon dioxide.
crew accommodations, engineers have worked hard to For perspective, these chemicals took up the volume of
evaluate and improve Orion’s features so that astronauts nearly 143 basketballs. Orion’s system will take up the
can complete missions in deep space comfortably, space of only 16 basketballs and save over 100 pounds.
efficiently, and safely.
Orion uses high pressure oxygen and nitrogen tanks to
provide the pressure control for the crew environment.
Environmental Control and Life Using these tanks simplifies the system to provide for
Support Systems greater reliability on deep space missions. The pressure
control system can be manually operated by the crew if
On Orion, environmental control and life support systems required in a severe situation.
(ECLSS) will make the crew module a habitable, safe
place for astronauts and is key to survival as they travel on A water supply system stores and distributes potable water
deep space missions. to the crew for drinking, food preparation, and medical
and hygiene needs.
On the International Space Station, a safe return to Earth
is only hours away, but that is not the case for deep space Environmental monitoring maintains the spacecraft’s
missions. Orion provides an ECLSS that is fault tolerant temperature, humidity and pressure, and detects when
and less complex than previous NASA human spacecraft. the spacecraft’s enclosed environment is compromised,
The key components of the ECLSS include atmosphere causing it to become unsafe. For deep space missions,
revitalization, pressure control, crew water supply, and Orion has an integrated crew survival capability, using
crew waste management. For Orion, these systems must pressurized suits for several days in order to return the
be mass and volume efficient as well as dependable. crew home safely in the event of a total cabin environment
loss due to pressure or air contamination. Not since Apollo
Atmosphere revitalization is the highest priority on deep has this capability been required.
space missions. Systems must not only provide oxygen
and remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, but also The ECLSS on Orion balance between the ever-present
prevent gases like ammonia and acetone, which humans constraints of launch mass, volume, system fault tolerance,
emit in small quantities, from accumulating. They also and reliability of resources to sustain astronauts and keep
must provide adequate ventilation for the crew and filter them safe in deep space.
particles and microbes. Orion has a new carbon dioxide
and humidity removal system which is regenerable, a key
for saving mass and volume on deep space vehicles. The
system, when exposed to the cabin air, absorbs carbon

Orion > Crew Systems 25

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Universal Waste
Management System
Orion’s crew module has a new space toilet, called the It’s also self-contained and compact at about 5 cubic feet in
Universal Waste Management System (UWMS), making volume, thus approximately 60 percent smaller and lighter
the essential task of going to the bathroom easier for both than the space shuttle toilet, easier to use, and built to
women and men and reducing the ever-important mass increase crew comfort. A new automatic air flow feature
and volume of the system to be launched into deep space. helps with odor control, fewer control interfaces simplifies
crew operations, and a more ergonomic design requires
Looking back, astronauts on Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo less clean-up and maintenance time, as do corrosion-
did not have toilets. They urinated into diapers and bags resistant, durable parts.
and brought their solid waste mixed with bactericide in
bags back home. Skylab was the first American spacecraft Pre-treated urine, which prevents the generation of
with a toilet, followed by the space shuttle. The space ammonia from the breakdown of the urine, is stored in a
shuttle toilet was a full size larger (about 12.3 cubic feet) urine tank and then vented overboard each day by the crew
and a massive system, using several separate motors and much like the space shuttle. Solid waste is collected in
fans for operations. fecal canisters, which the crew replace every few days, and
stored in Orion for the 21-day mission. The canisters have
Orion’s toilet operates in a similar way, using air flow to filtered caps to control odor and gas build up generated
pull fluid and solid waste away from the body and into the within the cans.
proper containers, but is improved for the needed mass
and volume constraints of deep space flight in Orion, and What makes the UWMS universal is that it can easily
is more accommodating to female astronauts. Based on integrate into different spacecraft and systems, keeping
their input, the shape of the seat for solid waste and design our astronauts healthy and safe as they live, work, and
of the funnel for urine has been changed, and they can be learn on Orion farther from Earth than ever before.
used simultaneously.

  The Universal Waste Management System (UWMS) that will fly on NASA’s Artemis II mission is self-contained and compact at about 5 cubic feet in volume,
making it 60 percent smaller and lighter than the space shuttle toilet, easier to use, and built to increase crew comfort.

Orion > Crew Systems 26

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Orion Crew Survival

System Suits
At several points during Artemis missions, astronauts
will wear a bright orange spacesuit called the Orion Crew
Survival System (OCSS) suit, which is designed to protect
them on their journey.

Improvements have been made from head to toe to the

suit worn on the space shuttle for Orion. Elements have
been reengineered to improve safety and range of motion
for astronauts, and instead of the small, medium, and
large sizes from the shuttle era, they will be custom fit for
each crew member.

The suits can keep astronauts alive for up to six days if

Orion were to lose cabin pressure during its journey, with
interfaces that supply air and remove carbon-dioxide.
They are also equipped with a suite of survival gear in the
event astronauts must exit Orion after splashdown in the
ocean before recovery personnel arrive, and the color is
easily recognizable in the ocean.

The outer layer is fire resistant and a stronger zipper

allows astronauts to quickly put the suit on. Improved
thermal management will help keep them cool and
dry. A lighter, stronger helmet improves comfort and
communication, and the gloves are more durable and
touch-screen compatible. Better-fitting boots will also
provide protection in the case of fire and help an astronaut
move more swiftly.

Astronauts will wear the suit on launch day, in emergency

situations, high-risk parts of missions near the Moon, and
during the high-speed return to Earth. Its design and  Dustin Gohmert, Orion Crew Survival Systems Project Manager at
NASA’s Johnson Space Center, poses for a portrait while wearing the Orion
engineering enhancements provide an additional layer Crew Survival System (OCSS) suit on Oct. 15, 2019 at NASA Headquarters
of protection for astronauts and ensure they return home in Washington, DC.
safely from deep space missions.

Orion > Crew Systems 27

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  A team member demonstrates using

the Universal Waste Management System
(UWMS), lifting the urine hose out of its
cradled position like a crew member would
for use. A funnel (not shown) is attached to
the open end of this hose and can then be
easily replaced or removed for disinfection.

Orion Crew Life Support and Safety Fun Facts

» Orion’s closed loop life support system is capable of maintaining a positive pressure, breathable atmosphere,
and thermal cooling for up to 144 hours to suited crewmembers in the event of a pressure vessel leak or
contaminated cabin atmosphere.
» Orion is designed to execute an abort and return to Earth from any point in the mission regardless of orbital
alignment with Earth, and provides a safe haven and survival equipment for onboard crew for up to 24 hours
post-landing.
» Orion is designed to provide assured crew return in the event of multiple system failures incorporating a backup
flight computer, manual control of life support systems, communication, and navigation aids.
» NASA and Lockheed Martin engineers working on the design of the Orion crew module collaborated with
NASCAR and Indy Car racing experts specializing in crash injuries to design state-of-the art crew seats,
restraints, and impact attenuation mechanisms to prevent injury of the astronauts in the event of a hard landing.

Orion > Crew Systems 28

 3
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

A p o l l o
T o Art e m i s

Apollo To Artemis > Crew Systems 29

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

While technology has improved since NASA’s final Orion’s launch abort system (LAS) looks like the escape
Apollo mission almost 50 years ago, the underlying tower flown on top of Apollo’s Saturn V rocket, but
physics principles that dictated Apollo’s shape and general upgrades make it possible for Orion to escape from its
design remain the same. That is largely why Apollo and launcher under more extreme conditions. This is largely
Orion bear a striking visual resemblance from the outside. due to the attitude control motor on Orion’s LAS, which
Building off what was learned from the Apollo program, consists of eight variable-thrust nozzles that can be
Orion’s major advancements will allow NASA to extend independently controlled and modulated. In the event
our reach past Earth to the Moon and beyond, expand the of an abort, Apollo’s non-vectoring “pitch” motor would
range of mission destinations, and accommodate larger only send the capsule in one direction. Orion’s computer,
crews for longer missions. however, can sense the vehicle’s orientation and send
commands to the attitude control motor to adjust each
Orion and Apollo systems are similarly comprised of three nozzle’s position and thrust, keeping Orion properly
major elements – a launch abort system, which protects positioned away from the rocket.
the crew during launch and ascent; a crew module, which
houses the crew and maintains a crew environment; At the system level, there are significant differences
and a service module, which provides main propulsive between Orion and Apollo. The Orion elements are
forces and supplies the crew module with power and life larger in scale, offering greater volume to accommodate
sustaining commodities. larger crews and provide greater range. Where Apollo was
designed to transport three crew for 14 days, Orion can
transport up to four crew for 21 days, and is designed to
be versatile and support a variety of destinations.

  On the left, the spacecraft for Apollo 10, with its Command and Service Modules attached, is moved to a work stand for mating to a lunar module adapter
inside the Manned Spacecraft Operations Building (now the Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building) at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida on
Jan. 31, 1969. To the right is the Orion spacecraft being lifted out of a processing work stand and onto a transporter inside the Neil Armstrong Operations
and Checkout Building on Jan. 14, 2021.

Apollo To Artemis > Crew Systems 30

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  On the left, NASA’s 363-foot-tall Saturn V rocket for the Apollo 4 mission stands inside the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) at the agency’s Kennedy
Space Center in Florida in preparation for roll out to the launch pad. On the right, the 322-foot-tall Space Launch System rocket and Orion spacecraft for the
Artemis I mission stands inside the VAB ahead of rollout for the mission’s wet dress rehearsal.

Orion has 30 percent more habitable space than Apollo, Orion also has over 1,200 sensors, and the crew module
allowing more room for the crew. Orion is also designed has a glass cockpit with screens and user-interfaces
with many more crew comforts to support longer duration reflective of our digital age, rather than Apollo’s analog
spaceflight, such as a galley for preparing meals and a inputs and outputs.
functioning waste management system. Crew exercise was
very difficult inside Apollo, as the environmental control Where Apollo ushered in the era of computers and
system was not designed to compensate for crew workouts. software, Orion capitalizes on decades of computing
However, Orion provides full exercise capability, and is also advancements. Orion’s guidance, navigation, and control
designed to maximize available privacy and mitigate noise (GN&C) system is comprised of flight computers,
and odors, enabling longer, healthier, and more hygienic displays and controls, optic measurement, and advanced
missions. Modern features have also been incorporated software. Compared to Apollo’s single flight computer,
into Orion, including composite materials, 3D printed Orion has two simultaneously operating redundant flight
parts, solar arrays, and an improved heat shield design. computers that each include two redundant computer

Apollo To Artemis > Crew Systems 31

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

modules, giving it a total of four redundant systems. The power system on Orion enables an entirely new class
In addition, just one of Orion’s redundant computers is of missions when compared to Apollo. Orion provides a
only 75 percent the weight of the sole computer aboard renewable power supply using solar cells to capture energy
Apollo, has 128,000 times more memory and is 20,000 from the Sun, where Apollo generated power using a finite
times faster. Orion’s computing redundancies not supply of hydrogen and oxygen loaded at the start of the
only improve safety, they also improve data collection mission to harness energy as they combined in a fuel
and processing power. cell. Free from the constraint of a resource-limited power
supply, Orion pioneers more distant crewed exploration
Apollo’s flight software was only capable of calculating and sustains extended mission durations.
the spacecraft’s trajectory; it would not adjust it real-time
in space based on sensor input, as Orion can. In contrast Orion’s parachutes may also look similar to those used
to the manual operation necessary on Apollo, Orion’s during the Apollo-era, but through testing and analysis,
software-driven avionics and other computers provide technicians have developed Orion’s parachutes to be
situational awareness and autonomy. Orion automates lighter, their performance better understood, and more
functions, thereby freeing astronauts for other tasks, as capable than Apollo’s. Engineers have figured out how
they will not have to frequently monitor spacecraft systems to manage the stresses on the system during deployment
and verify their trajectory. The software also enables full more efficiently, decrease the mass of the parachutes by
uncrewed test flights and checkout before a mission is using high tech fabric materials rather than metal cables
crewed, drastically increasing crew safety. for the risers that attach the parachute to the spacecraft,
and improve how the parachute is packed into Orion so
Relative to Apollo, Orion’s systems have also been upgraded they deploy more reliably.
to account for the effects of space radiation exposure,
an environmental hazard that is better understood There are a number of differences between Orion and
since the Apollo missions. To counter the radiation Apollo’s crew module uprighting system (CMUS), the
hazard, electronic components within the computers are airbags responsible for uprighting the crew module in
radiation hardened. This is something Apollo did not the case of an inverted splashdown. Due to Orion’s
account for as missions were flown during a period of larger diameter as compared to Apollo, five airbags are
minimum solar activity. required to upright Orion, whereas the smaller Apollo
only required three airbags. The Apollo airbags were
inflated using a compressor and solenoid valves, while
Orion’s CMUS uses pyro-valves and helium to inflate the
airbags. As a result, the Orion CMUS inflation system is
lighter than the Apollo system.

Apollo To Artemis > Crew Systems 32

 4
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

P a rtn e r
Pro g r a m s

33
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Space Launch System

NASA’s Space Launch System, or SLS, is an evolvable the largest ever built for spaceflight. Teledyne Brown
family of super heavy-lift launch vehicles that provides the Engineering is the lead contractor for the launch vehicle
foundation for human exploration beyond Earth’s orbit. stage adapter (LVSA), and Marshall Space Flight Center
With its unprecedented power and volume for payloads, built the Orion stage adapter (OSA).
SLS is the only rocket that can send Orion, astronauts,
and cargo to the Moon on a single mission.
Solid Rocket Boosters
Offering more payload mass, volume, and departure energy
per launch than commercial rockets, SLS is designed to be Together, the SLS twin solid rocket boosters provide
flexible and evolvable and will open new possibilities for more than 75 percent of the total SLS thrust at launch.
payloads, including robotic scientific missions to places The SLS booster design is based on the space shuttle
like the Moon, Mars, the gas giants Saturn and Jupiter, boosters but has an additional motor propellant segment
and the ice giants Uranus and Neptune. to provide more power and several other upgrades. The
new design has completed five full-scale test firings in a
The SLS team is producing NASA’s first deep space horizontal position with the final qualification motor test
rocket built for human space travel since the Saturn V. in June 2016. Standing 177 feet tall, the SLS booster is
Each variant in the evolvable SLS family uses the same the largest, most powerful solid propellant booster ever
main propulsion system of a core stage, liquid fueled built for flight, with more than three million pounds of
engines, and solid rocket boosters. The first SLS vehicle, thrust each. While the boosters are using metal casings
called Block 1, will create more than 8.8 million pounds and parts that were flown on space shuttle missions, they
of thrust during launch and ascent and will be capable have many new upgrades and new parts, including a new
of delivering more than 27 metric tons (59,525 pounds) insulation-liner configuration and new avionics systems
to the Moon. It will be powered by twin five-segment to control flight. In addition, the SLS boosters undergo
solid rocket boosters and four RS-25 liquid propellant an improved nondestructive evaluation process to confirm
core stage engines. After reaching space, the interim each motor’s readiness for launch.
cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) sends Orion on to
the Moon. The first three Artemis missions will use a NASA and booster prime contractor Northrop Grumman
Block 1 rocket with an ICPS. are working to design, develop and test next-generation
boosters that will power SLS flights after all available
The next planned evolution of the SLS, the Block 1B shuttle-era hardware is expended. Teams are testing small-
crew vehicle, will replace the ICPS with a new, more scale solid rocket motors to evaluate new components
powerful exploration upper stage (EUS) to enable more including propellant, insulation materials, and nozzle
ambitious missions. The Block 1B vehicle can send materials for future SLS Block 2 flights.
38 tons (nearly 84,000 pounds) to the Moon and in a
single launch carry the Orion spacecraft along with
large cargos for exploration systems needed to support a RS-25 Engine
sustained presence on the Moon.
Four Aerojet Rocketdyne RS-25 engines will power the
Boeing is the prime contractor for the core stage, ICPS, core stage of the SLS. The liquid hydrogen/liquid oxygen-
and EUS; Aerojet Rocketdyne built the RS-25 engines for powered engines are compact and have high performance.
those stages. Northrop Grumman is the prime contractor At full throttle, the four engines will give the SLS about
for the five-segment solid rocket boosters, which are two million of its 8.8 million pounds of maximum thrust

Partner Programs > Space Launch System 34

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  Inside the Rotation, Processing and Surge Facility at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Nov. 17, 2020, the left and right booster segments for
the Space Launch System are being prepared for their move to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB).

for the full eight-minute climb to orbit. Although SLS Core Stage
uses RS-25 engines that flew on the space shuttle, they
had to be modified slightly and tested to fly on the SLS The SLS core stage is the world’s tallest rocket stage.
rocket. The acceptance testing is complete for all 16 RS-25 Towering 212 feet with a diameter of 27.6 feet, it will
engines that served as former space shuttle main engines. store cryogenic liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen and all
Tests at NASA’s Stennis Space Center near Bay St. Louis, the systems that will feed the stage’s four RS-25 engines.
Mississippi have shown that the engines can perform at It also houses the flight computers and other avionics
the higher power level and other unique requirements needed to control the rocket’s flight. The core stage is
needed to launch the super heavy-lift SLS rocket. Since designed to operate for approximately 500 seconds,
January 2015, NASA has conducted 32 developmental reaching nearly Mach 23 and more than 530,000 feet in
and flight engine tests for a total of more than 14,000 altitude before it separates from the upper stage and Orion
seconds – more than four hours – of cumulative hot fire. spacecraft. The core stage serves as the backbone of the
Testing included certifying new engine controllers to be rocket, supporting the weight of the payload, upper stage,
used by the heritage RS-25 engines, Green Run testing and Orion, as well as the thrust of its four RS-25 engines
of two new, unflown engines, and tests with new parts and two five-segment solid rocket boosters attached to the
for future engines. Future-production engines will include engine and intertank sections. The core stage was built
parts made with advanced manufacturing techniques, by Boeing at NASA’s Michoud Assembly Facility near
such as additive manufacturing, that have the potential to New Orleans using the world’s largest spacecraft welding
streamline cost and production of the engines. tool, the Vertical Assembly Center among other advanced
spacecraft manufacturing and welding tools.

Partner Programs > Space Launch System 35

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Core Stage Green Run Interim Cryogenic

Propulsion Stage
The Artemis I core stage with its four RS-25 engines
underwent a series of “green run” tests in 2020 and early The interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) is a
2021 to thoroughly checkout this brand-new rocket stage 5-meter, single-engine liquid hydrogen/ liquid oxygen-
that has never flown before. After manufacturing at based system that provides in-space propulsion after the
NASA’s Michoud Assembly Facility near New Orleans, solid rocket boosters and core stage are jettisoned. The
Louisiana, the stage was barged to NASA’s Stennis Space ICPS, built by Boeing and United Launch Alliance,
Center in Mississippi and installed in the B-2 test stand. is a modified Delta Cryogenic Second Stage, a proven
There were eight major test cases that made up the Green upper stage used on United Launch Alliance’s Delta IV
Run series. The first, a modal test that applied forces to family of launch vehicles. Modifications for SLS included
the stage to validate structural loads computer models was lengthening the liquid hydrogen tank, adding hydrazine
completed on Jan. 30, 2020. bottles for attitude control, and minor avionics changes.
The ICPS is powered by one Aerojet Rocketdyne RL10
The second test was a checkout of the avionics and flight engine and generates 24,750 pounds of maximum thrust.
computers, which control the rocket’s first eight minutes
of flight. The third test exercised all the safety systems that
shut down the stage in case of an issue. The fourth test Launch Vehicle Stage Adapter
of the series tested each of the main propulsion system
components that connect to the engines. During the The cone-shaped launch vehicle stage adapter (LVSA)
fifth test, engineers ensured that the thrust vector control partially encloses the ICPS and connects it to the SLS core
system steers the four engines and checked all the related stage below and the Orion stage adapter (OSA) above. A
hydraulic systems. The sixth test simulated the launch pneumatically actuated frangible joint assembly at the top
countdown, including step-by-step propellant loading of the adapter separates the core stage and LVSA from
procedures, and the test team exercised and validated the the ICPS, OSA, and Orion. In addition to providing
countdown timeline and sequence of events. During the structural support for launch and a separation system,
seventh test, known as the wet dress rehearsal, engineers the LVSA also protects avionics and electrical devices in
demonstrated loading, controlling, and draining the ICPS from extreme vibration and acoustic conditions
more than 700,000 gallons of cryogenic propellants during launch and ascent. Prime contractor Teledyne
into and out of the core stage and then returning the Brown Engineering manufactures the LVSA using self-
stage to a safe condition. reacting friction-stir welding tools at NASA’s Marshall
Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.
The Green Run testing culminated with all four engines
being fired in early 2021 for eight minutes, just as they
will operate during launch to send Orion and the upper
stage to space.

Following the test, NASA shipped the core stage to

the agency’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida for final
assembly and integration with the Orion spacecraft.

  Inside the Space Station Processing Facility (SSPF) high bay at NASA’s
Kennedy Space Center in Florida, workers assist as a crane lifts the Orion
stage adapter (OSA) away from the flatbed of a transport truck.

Partner Programs > Space Launch System 36

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  Inside the United Launch Alliance (ULA) Horizontal Integration Facility at

Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida, the interim cryogenic propul-
sion stage (ICPS) for NASA’s Space Launch System rocket is secured on a
movable transport stand.

Orion Stage Adapter

The Orion stage adapter (OSA), built in-house by
Marshall Space Flight Center, connects the ICPS to the
Orion spacecraft. The adapter contains a diaphragm
that provides a barrier to prevent gases generated during In a separate test program completed in 2017, the SLS
launch, such as hydrogen, from entering Orion. The OSA team performed similar structural testing for the SLS
can also carry small payloads, called CubeSats, to deep in-space stage and payload sections, including the ICPS,
space. The OSA can potentially accommodate up to 17 the LVSA and the OSA, as well as a frangible joint
CubeSats in a combination of 6U and 12U sizes (one unit, assembly. The adapters connect the parts of the vehicle,
or U, is 10 cm x 10 cm x 10 cm). The actual number of change its diameter, and protect electronics during ascent.
CubeSats manifested on a flight depends on several factors, The ICPS, powered by one Aerojet Rocketdyne RL10
including mission parameters and the combined weight engine, helps send Orion on its trajectory to the Moon.
of these small spacecraft. The SLS Program provides a A previous version of the RL10 and the Delta Cryogenic
comprehensive secondary payload deployment system for Second Stage, on which the ICPS is based, have both
CubeSats, including mounting brackets for commercial served on numerous flights of the United Launch Alliance
off the-shelf dispensers, cable harnesses, a vibration Delta IV rocket with the RL10 just completing its 500th
isolation system, and an avionics unit. CubeSats can play flight; both have completed extensive testing.
a key role in the Artemis missions by gathering data and
demonstrating potential technologies that reduce risk,
increase effectiveness, and improve the design of robotic
and human space exploration missions.

Structural Testing Flight Software and Avionics

Structural testing at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center The core stage flight computers and avionics, which
in Huntsville, Alabama, has been completed on the 212- control the rocket’s first eight minutes of flight, have
foot SLS core stage and the upper part of the rocket, which undergone extensive qualification testing both in lab
includes the stage that sends the Orion spacecraft to the testing at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, on the
Moon. These tests help verify computer models showing Artemis I core stage at Michoud Assembly Facility and
the structural design can survive flight. Special test stands during Green Run stage testing at Stennis Space Center.
subjected the core stage engine section, liquid hydrogen In the lab environment, the flight software has been tested
tank, intertank, and liquid oxygen tank to millions of by flying thousands of simulated launches and flights
pounds of flight-like pushing, pulling, bending and replicating both nominal and contingency operations.
twisting stresses. The structural test program, which was Avionics testing has been completed for the core stage and
the most extensive structural test program since the space for the other SLS propulsion element that launches the
shuttle, began in 2017 with the engine section and ended rocket, the twin solid rocket boosters.
in 2020 with the liquid oxygen tank.

Partner Programs > Space Launch System 37

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Wind Tunnel Testing Acoustic Testing

The SLS team completed numerous tests that simulate Researchers at NASA’s Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility,
launch and flight conditions. Extensive wind tunnel formerly known as Plum Brook Station, in Sandusky,
testing has been conducted at NASA’s Ames Research Ohio, completed a development test on a proposed design
Center in Moffett Field California, Langley Research of acoustic panels for the SLS universal stage adapter,
Center in Hampton Virginia, and Marshall Space an adapter that will connect an exploration upper stage
Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. These tests used (EUS) planned for future SLS configurations with the
scale rocket models to study how the vibration, base Orion spacecraft. Given the extreme sound produced
heating, and other environments affect the launch by the world’s most powerful rocket, this test series,
vehicle designs for both the Block 1 and Block 1B SLS conducted at Armstrong’s Reverberant Acoustic Test
configurations. Scale models of the upgraded rocket in Facility, provided data for acoustic modeling that will
crew and cargo configurations were carefully positioned be used to ensure future payloads aboard the Block 1B
in wind tunnels for test programs to obtain data needed configuration are protected from the high levels of noise
to refine the design of the rocket and its guidance and and vibration experienced during launch. Even the Block
control systems. During hundreds of test runs at Langley 1 configuration of the rocket generates significant acoustic
and Ames, engineers worked on measuring the forces vibrations. Acoustic testing with a scale model of the SLS
and loads that air induces on the launch vehicle during Block 1 was conducted early in the program at NASA’s
every phase of its mission. Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.

SLS Fun Facts

» A t liftoff, the Block 1 Space Launch System (SLS) will provide 8.8 million pounds of thrust.
» This is more than 32 times the total thrust of a 747 jet.
» It’s also 15 percent more thrust than the Saturn V at liftoff.
» 8.8 million pounds of thrust produces horsepower equivalent to:
» 167,600 Corvette engines
» 14,000 locomotive engines
» The Block 1 configuration will stand 322 feet tall, which is taller than the Statue of Liberty.
» At launch, the SLS will weigh 5.75 million pounds, which is equivalent to more than 7.5 fully loaded 747 jets.
» The SLS can bring 59,525 pounds to the Moon. This is equivalent to nearly 30 one-ton pickup trucks’ worth of
cargo, or 4.5 fully grown elephants.
» If the heat energy of the SLS solid rocket boosters (SRBs) could be converted to electric power, the two SRBs
firing for 2 minutes would produce 2.3 million kilowatt hours of power, enough to supply power to over 92,000
homes for a full day.
» Each SRB burns approximately 5.5 tons of propellant per second.

Partner Programs > Space Launch System 38

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

SLS Quick Facts

Solid Rocket Booster Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS)
Length 177 ft. Height 45 ft.

Diameter 12 ft. Diameter 17 ft.

Weight 1.6 million lbs. each Propellant Liquid hydrogen/liquid oxygen

Propellant Polybutadiene acrylonitrile (PBAN) Engine 1 Aerojet Rocketdyne RL10

Thrust 3.6 million lbs. each Thrust 24,750 lbs.

Operational Time 126 seconds

Core Stage RS-25 Engine

Length Approximately 212 ft. Thrust 177 ft.

Diameter 27.6 ft. Size 12 ft.

Empty Weight Approximately 188,000 lbs. Weight 1.6 million lbs. each

Capacities Liquid hydrogen (LH2) Operational Time Polybutadiene acrylonitrile (PBAN)

537,000 gallons (2 million liters)
Operational Temp Range 3.6 million lbs. each
(317,000 lbs.)
Liquid oxygen (LOX)
196,000 gallons (742,000 liters)
(1.86 million lbs.)
Material Aluminum 2219

Orion Stage Adapter (OSA) Launch Vehicle Stage Adapter (LVSA)

Height 5 ft. Height 27.5 ft.

Top Diameter 18 ft. Top Diameter 16.5 ft.

Payload Volume 516 ft³ up to 17 berths for 6U/12U Bottom Diameter 27.5 ft.

Partner Programs > SLS Quick Facts 39

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  In High Bay 3 of the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the right-hand forward segment is lowered by crane on top
of the center forward segment on the mobile launcher for the Space Launch System (SLS) on March 3, 2021.

Exploration Ground Systems

The Exploration Ground Systems Program (EGS) is Unlike previous work focusing on a single kind of launch
one of four NASA programs based at the agency’s vehicle, such as the Saturn V or space shuttle, engineers
Kennedy Space Center in Florida, including Launch and managers in EGS are preparing infrastructure to
Services, Commercial Crew, and Exploration Research support several different kinds of spacecraft and rockets
Technology programs. EGS was established to develop that are in development, including NASA’s Space
and operate the systems and facilities necessary to Launch System (SLS) rocket and Orion spacecraft
process and launch rockets and spacecraft during for the Artemis program.
assembly, transport, launch, and recovery.
A key aspect of the program’s approach to long-term
EGS’s mission is to transform the center from a sustainability and affordability is to make processing and
historically government-only launch complex to a launch infrastructure available to commercial and other
spaceport that can handle several different kinds government customers, thereby distributing the cost among
of spacecraft and rockets and NASA’s exploration multiple users and reducing the cost of access to space.
objectives by developing the necessary ground systems,
infrastructure and operational approaches. NASA is developing the SLS exploration class rocket and
working with several private companies to produce vehicles
to take astronauts to low-Earth orbit and the International

Partner Programs > Exploration Ground Systems 40

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Multi-Element Verification and

Validation: Mobile Launcher/
Launch Pad 39B
The mobile launcher – the 380-foot-tall ground structure
that will be used to assemble, process, and launch SLS
– has gone through a series of tests both in the Vehicle
Assembly Building (VAB), the facility where space vehicle
components are assembled and stacked vertically onto
the mobile launcher platforms, and the newly renovated
Launch Pad 39B, the pad from which Artemis missions
will be launched. Crawler-Transporter 2 (CT-2) completed
a test rollout of the mobile launcher for integrated testing
at the newly renovated Launch Pad 39B, validating it can
communicate effectively with the facility systems and
ground systems to perform appropriately during launch.
CT-2 rolled the mobile launcher to Launch Pad 39B in
June 2019, where it stayed for several months for multi-
element verification and validation tests. This included
the sound suppression system, loading the cryogenic
fuel system, a simultaneous umbilical swing test, and
more. CT-2 returned the mobile launcher to the VAB
in December 2019 for modal testing with the mobile
In the transfer aisle of the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA’s Kennedy launcher sitting on the mount pedestals as well as CT-2
Space Center in Florida, workers use a crane to lift up the left-hand booster
sharing the load. Exploration Ground Systems conducted
forward assembly for the agency’s Space Launch System for transfer into
High Bay 3 on March 1, 2021. a six-hour pressurization test of the liquid oxygen (LOX)
tank at Launch Pad 39B, which has been upgraded for the
Space Station. The SLS is set to be the most powerful U.S. agency’s SLS rocket. The SLS will use both liquid oxygen
rocket since the Saturn V took astronauts to the Moon and liquid hydrogen propellants. An initial test of Xenon
and will act as the cornerstone for NASA’s future human lights took place with the mobile launcher on the pad.
exploration missions to deep space destinations.
The EGS and Jacobs teams rolled the mobile launcher
EGS is focusing on the equipment, management and atop CT-2 out of the VAB to Launch Pad 39B for a
operations required to safely connect a spacecraft with second time in October 2020, to help prepare the launch
a rocket, move the launch vehicle to the launch pad, team for the “wet dress rehearsal,” when SLS and Orion
successfully launch it into space, and recover the spacecraft. are rolled out to the pad atop the mobile launcher to
The work entails the use of many of the facilities unique to practice fueling operations shortly before launch. During
Kennedy, such as the 52-story Vehicle Assembly Building the mobile launcher’s 10-day stay, engineers performed
and Launch Pad 39B. several tasks, including a timing test to validate the
launch team’s countdown timeline, and a thorough, top-
Kennedy has more than 50 years serving as our nation’s to-bottom wash down of the mobile launcher to remove
gateway to exploring the universe. Taking the knowledge any debris remaining from construction and installation
and assets of NASA’s successful spacefaring past, the of the umbilical arms.
EGS Program is helping to build a successful and
diverse future in spaceflight.

Partner Programs > Exploration Ground Systems 41

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Launch Control Center day throws their way. Under the leadership of Launch
Young-Crippen Firing Room 1 / Director Charlie Blackwell-Thompson, the team has tested
cryogenic loading, terminal count, otherwise known
Launch Simulations as the final countdown to launch, and other portions
The firing rooms are the heart of the Spaceport Command of the launch software currently in the final phases
and Control System at Kennedy, which will operate, of development.
monitor, and coordinate the ground equipment for launch
of the SLS rocket and Orion spacecraft. All the activities
involved with preparing rockets, spacecraft, and payloads Spacecraft Recovery
for space can be controlled by engineers sitting at computer
terminals in the firing rooms. Likewise, all activities at the Exploration Ground Systems leads a joint NASA and
launch pads can be run from a firing room. Department of Defense team that continues training at
sea to improve joint landing and recovery operations for
The Young-Crippen Firing Room, previously known as the Orion spacecraft and crew from future deep space
Firing Room 1, oversaw launches ranging from the first exploration missions. Recovery personnel have practiced
Apollo missions to the first space shuttle mission and, procedures and operations in the Neutral Buoyancy
after many upgrades, will be used for Artemis I. Laboratory pool near Johnson Space Center, and in the
open water off the coast of California, during a series of
The Artemis I launch team has conducted a series of Underway Recovery Tests using a test version of the Orion
simulations to test critical portions of the countdown to spacecraft and other equipment that will be used during
ensure everyone is ready to handle any situation launch recovery operations.

Members of the Artemis I launch team participate in a countdown simulation inside the Launch Control Center’s Firing Room 1 at NASA’s Kennedy Space
Center in Florida on Feb. 3, 2020.

Partner Programs > Exploration Ground Systems 42

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Inside the Multi-Operations Support Building near the Multi-Payload Processing Facility (MPPF) at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Aug. 16,
2019, a row of Self-Contained Atmospheric Protective Ensemble (SCAPE) suits hang inside a changing room.

These tests help to evaluate and improve recovery SCAPE

procedures and hardware ahead of Orion’s flight on
Artemis I and II. Testing also included recovering the Self-Contained Atmospheric Protective Ensemble
spacecraft from Orion’s first flight test, Exploration (SCAPE) suits are used in operations involving toxic
Flight Test-1, when the spacecraft launched atop a Delta propellants and are supplied with air either through
IV Heavy rocket on Dec. 5, 2014, from Space Launch a hardline or through a self-contained environmental
Complex 37 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in control unit. During preparations for launch, teams at
Florida before splashing down in the Pacific Ocean about Kennedy Space Center are responsible for loading the
600 miles off the coast of San Diego. The Landing and Orion vehicle with propellants prior to transportation to
Recovery team completed their final certification run in the Vehicle Assembly Building, where it will be secured
2021 to ensure they are ready for splashdown of Orion atop the Space Launch System rocket.
after the Artemis I mission.
Exploration Ground Systems spent time preparing for
Artemis I with a series of hazardous hypergolic test events
at the Kennedy Multi-Payload Processing Facility (MPPF)
prior to the spacecraft’s arrival. In August 2019, SCAPE
technicians practiced by putting on the 38 suits for a test
simulation of loading propellants into a replicated test
tank for Orion. After donning their suits, the technicians
completed a tanking to test the system before Orion
arrived for processing.

Partner Programs > Exploration Ground Systems 43

 5
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Co m p l e t e d
F l i g h t T e s t s

Completed Flight Tests > Exploration Ground Systems 44

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

STORRM / STS-134
The Sensor Test for Orion Relative Navigation Risk STORRM hardware included a laser-based state-of-the art
Mitigation (STORRM) was successfully demonstrated vision navigation sensor (VNS), which provided an image of
on Space Shuttle Endeavour’s STS-134 mission to the the target (in this case, the ISS) and calculated with precise
International Space Station (ISS) on May 16, 2011. accuracies for range, bearing, alignment and orientation
data up to six degrees of freedom. In comparison, the space
The goal of STORRM was to validate a new relative shuttle’s sensors could only calculate up to three degrees
navigation sensor based on advanced laser and detector of freedom. The STORRM hardware also included a
technology that will make docking and undocking easier docking camera to provide high-resolution color imagery.
and safer, and test the hardware in the same environment
that the sensors would experience on the first Orion Working together, these sensors provided real-
rendezvous to another vehicle. On Orion, these sensors time 3D images with a resolution 16 times
were installed on the hatch window of the crew module. higher than previous space shuttle sensors. An avionics
assembly, which consisted of a power distribution unit,
Astronauts tested the new navigation and docking system data recorder unit, and memory storage, was manifested
on two different flight days, first on their initial approach to communicate with a space-certified laptop. Five
to dock to the ISS and later after undocking from the reflective docking targets were previously installed on the
ISS. STS-134 performed an unprecedented re-rendezvous space station during STS-131 and provided a cooperative
of the ISS, as Commander Mark Kelly and pilot Greg target for the VNS.
Johnson navigated the shuttle to make an Orion-like
approach to the ISS before de-orbiting on Flight Day STORRM collected 600 gigabytes of data and the VNS
14. Astronaut Andrew Feustel operated the STORRM performed better than expected, providing continuous
equipment during the testing. measurements from as far away as 3.5 miles to within
six feet of the space station – three times the range
capability of the current relative navigation sensor. The
sensor technology also provided exceptional 3D images
of the target.

Teams conduct powerup and

docking operations for the Sensor
Test for Orion Relative Navigation
Risk Mitigation (STORRM) in a
payload support room at Johnson
Space Center’s Mission Control
Center in Houston on May 18, 2011.

Completed Flight Tests > STORRM / STS-134 45

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

The data collected by STORRM will help to make Engineers at NASA’s Langley Research Center were
docking and un-docking with other spacecraft safer and responsible for engineering management, design and build
easier for astronauts on Orion. of the avionics assembly, STORRM software application,
and reflective elements. They were also responsible for the
STORRM was developed by the Orion Program at integration, testing, and certification of these components.
NASA’s Johnson Space Center, which was responsible for Industry partners Lockheed Martin and Ball Aerospace
program management, technology evaluation, flight test were responsible for the design, build, and testing of the VNS
objectives, operational concepts, contract management, and docking camera.
and data post-processing.
Launch Date May 16, 2011 8:56 a.m. EDT

Landing Date June 1, 2011 2:34 a.m. EST

Launch Site Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39A

Launch Vehicle Space Shuttle Endeavour

Landing Site Kennedy Space Center

Pad Abort-1
On May 6, 2010, at the U.S. Army’s White Sands Missile The attitude control motor fired simultaneously with
Range (WSMR) near Las Cruces, New Mexico, NASA the abort motor and steered the vehicle, using eight
conducted a successful flight test known as Pad Abort-1, thrusters that produce up to 7,000 pounds of thrust. It
a test of the Orion launch abort system (LAS), a critical provided adjustable thrust to keep the crew module on
safety system that sits atop Orion at launch and during a controlled flight path and reoriented the vehicle as the
ascent. If an emergency occurs during launch, the LAS abort system burned out.
pulls Orion and its crew away from the rocket for a safe
landing in the Atlantic Ocean. Pad Abort-1 demonstrated The jettison motor, the only motor of the three that would
the capability of the LAS to propel the crew module to be used in all nominal rocket launches, pulled the entire
a safe distance during a ground-initiated abort on the launch abort system away from the crew module and
launch pad. The flight test lasted about 135 seconds from cleared the way for parachute deployment and landing.
launch until the crew module touched down about a mile After explosive bolts fired and the jettison motor separated
north of the launch pad. the system from the crew module, the recovery parachute

The test involved three motors. An abort motor produced This aerial scene following the Pad Abort-1 test on May 6, 2010 shows
a momentary half-million pounds of thrust to propel the crew module and main parachutes on the ground at the White Sands
the crew module away from the pad. It burned for Missile Range in New Mexico.
approximately six seconds, with the highest impulse in
the first 2.5 seconds. The crew module reached a speed of
approximately 445 mph in the first three seconds, with a
maximum velocity of 539 mph in its upward trajectory to
about 1.2 miles high.

Completed Flight Tests > Pad Abort-1 46

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

system deployed. The parachutes guided the crew module Launch Date May 6, 2010 7:00 a.m. MDT
to touchdown at 16.2 mph (24 feet per second), about one
Launch Site U.S. Army’s White Sands Missile Range,
mile from the launch pad.
New Mexico Launch Complex 32E
Duration 2 min., 15 sec.
The Orion Program at NASA’s Johnson Space Center
in Houston led the launch abort system test team. Distance 6,900 ft. downrange
NASA’s Langley Research Center designed and built the Altitude 6,336 ft.
boilerplate crew module for the test, and NASA’s Dryden
Flight Research Center prepared the crew module for
integration and led the flight test vehicle integration at
WSMR with Lockheed Martin, the prime contractor
to NASA for Orion.

Exploration Flight Test-1

On Dec. 5, 2014, Orion lifted off from Space Launch parking orbit. After completing one revolution around the
Complex 37 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Earth, during which time controllers in Mission Control in
Florida on a United Launch Alliance Delta IV Heavy Houston verified the functioning of the spacecraft’s systems,
rocket and splashed down approximately 4.5 hours later the second stage ignited a second time, raising Orion’s
in the Pacific Ocean. The test, called Exploration Flight apogee, or high point, above the Earth to 3,600 miles.
Test-1, or EFT-1, demonstrated Orion’s space-worthiness, During the coast to apogee, Orion remained attached to
tested the spacecraft’s heat shield during entry into Earth’s the second stage and completed its first crossing through
atmosphere, and proved the capsule’s recovery systems. the inner Van Allen radiation belt.
The test flight carried a high-fidelity crew module and
a mock service module that remained attached to the
rocket’s upper stage until its return to Earth.

At 7:05 a.m., the three-core first stage of the Delta-IV

Heavy rocket ignited, lifting Orion off to begin the
mission. Approximately four minutes after liftoff, the two
side boosters separated as the center core continued firing.
The second stage ignited after separation to begin the first
of three planned burns. During the first burn, the service
module’s protective fairing separated, followed by the
launch abort system. This first burn of the second stage
placed the spacecraft into a preliminary 115-by-552-mile

A Delta IV Heavy rocket lifts off from Space Launch Complex 37 at Cape
Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida carrying NASA’s Orion spacecraft on
Exploration Flight Test-1, an unpiloted flight test to Earth orbit.

Completed Flight Tests > Exploration Flight Test-1 47

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

A view from the top hatch window as plasma surrounds the vehicle
during reentry on Orion’s first flight test, Exploration Flight Test-1 (EFT-1),
on December 5, 2014.

inspection of the spacecraft at Kennedy, workers trucked

it to the Lockheed Martin facility in Littleton, Colorado,
where engineers completed final inspections and
decontamination of the vehicle, which is now on display
at the Kennedy Space Center Visitors Complex.

EFT-1 collected data that is helping NASA lower risks to

the astronauts who will later fly on Orion. This included
verifying the thermal protection system, hardware
separation events, the parachute system and the crew
module uprighting system, as well as allowing engineers
to identify design issues and fix them before Orion carries
About three hours after launch, Orion reached its apogee astronauts on future missions. The first flight also gave
and began its descent back toward Earth, separating from NASA the chance to continue refining its production and
the second stage. During the passage back through the Van coordination processes, and Orion’s design teams gained
Allen belt, Orion fired its thrusters to adjust its course for important experience and training to ensure the industry
return, and at an altitude of 400,000 feet, the spacecraft is prepared to launch Orion on its first integrated flight
entered the Earth’s atmosphere, traveling at 20,000 mph. with the Space Launch System rocket.
The spacecraft experienced maximum heating of about
4,000 degrees Fahrenheit, proving the worthiness of the Lockheed Martin, NASA’s prime contractor for Orion,
heat shield. After release of Orion’s forward bay cover, manufactured the high-fidelity crew module and a
two drogue parachutes deployed to slow and stabilize mock service module. The Delta IV Heavy rocket was
the spacecraft. Then the three main parachutes deployed, built by United Launch Alliance. Lockheed Martin
slowing the spacecraft to 20 mph. Splashdown occurred began manufacturing the crew module in 2011, and it
4 hours and 24 minutes after launch about 600 miles was constructed at NASA’s Michoud Assembly Facility.
southwest of San Diego. Lockheed Martin delivered the crew module in July
2012 to the Neil Armstrong Operations & Checkout
A NASA and U.S. Navy team aboard the USS Anchorage Building (O&C) at Kennedy Space Center, where heat
recovered Orion and returned it to U.S. Naval Base shield installation, final assembly, integration and testing
San Diego. After its arrival, workers placed the Orion were completed. More than 1,000 companies across
capsule aboard a truck that delivered it to the Kennedy the country manufactured or contributed elements to
Space Center. After engineers conducted a thorough Orion for EFT-1.

Launch Date Dec. 5, 2014 7:05 a.m. EST

Landing Date Dec. 5, 2014 11:29 a.m. EST

Launch Site Cape Canaveral Air Force Station,

Florida, SLC-37B
Launch Vehicle Delta IV Heavy

Landing Site Pacific Ocean, 640 miles SSE off coast of

San Diego; Recovered by USS Anchorage
Duration 4 hr., 24 min., 46 sec.

Altitude 3,597.8 miles

Completed Flight Tests > Exploration Flight Test-1 48

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Ascent Abort-2
On July 2, 2019, NASA conducted a successful test known During AA-2, a test booster provided by Northrop
as Ascent Abort-2 (AA-2), which tested the Orion launch Grumman launched from Space Launch Complex 46
abort system (LAS), a critical safety system that sits atop at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida at 7 a.m.
Orion at launch and during ascent. If an emergency occurs EDT, carrying a fully functional LAS and a 22,000-
during launch, the LAS pulls Orion and its crew away pound Orion test vehicle to an altitude of 31,000 feet
from the rocket for a safe landing in the Atlantic Ocean. (approximately six miles) at Mach 1.18 (over 1,000
Ascent Abort-2 demonstrated this capability of the LAS, mph). At that point, the LAS’ powerful reverse-flow
propelling the crew module to a safe distance during abort motor fired 400,000 pounds of thrust, propelling
ascent at a point midway between maximum aerodynamic the Orion test vehicle to a safe distance away from the
pressure and maximum aerodynamic drag. This stressing rocket to splashdown in the Atlantic Ocean. The test took
test case, combined with subsystem qualification tests and approximately three minutes.
the successful Pad Abort-1 flight test in 2010, resulted in
a LAS that is certified to fly on the Artemis missions with A total of 890 developmental flight instrumentation
astronauts on board. (DFI) measurements were monitored and recorded during
AA-2 on the booster, separation ring, crew module, and
LAS. During descent, data from the test was downlinked
as well as recorded on board by 12 data recorders that were
ejected from the crew module in pairs starting 20 seconds
after LAS jettison. The foam-encased data recorders
initiated tracking beacons upon impact and floated in the
ocean, enabling their recovery post-test.

Since AA-2 was meant to test Orion’s ability to abort

during ascent, it was not equipped with parachutes nor was
the test capsule recovered from the ocean for cost-saving
purposes. NASA already fully qualified the parachute
system for flights with crew through an extensive series of
17 developmental tests and 8 qualification tests completed
at the end of 2018.

A fully functional launch abort system (LAS) with a test version

of Orion attached, launches on NASA’s Ascent Abort-2 (AA-2)
atop a Northrop Grumman provided booster on July 2, 2019, at 7
a.m. EDT from Launch Pad 46 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station
in Florida.

Completed Flight Tests > Ascent Abort-2 49

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

NASA’s prime contractor, Lockheed Martin, provided The agency’s Langley Research Center built the primary
the fully functional Orion LAS, and the crew module structure of the crew module test article and a separation
to service module umbilical and flight design retention ring that connected the test capsule to the booster and
and release mechanisms. NASA’s Johnson Space Center provided space and volume for separation mechanisms and
was responsible for producing the fully assembled and instrumentation. Critical sensors and instruments used
integrated crew module and separation ring. This included to gather data during the test were provided by NASA’s
development of unique avionics, power, guidance, Armstrong Flight Research Center. Exploration Ground
navigation and control (GN&C), software and data Systems (EGS) and Jacobs Test and Operations Contract
collection subsystems, and the ejectable data recorders. (TOSC) processed the vehicle at NASA’s Kennedy Space
Johnson also provided the operations team responsible Center before launch.
for conducting the launch, as well as several elements of
ground support equipment used to power and control the Launch Date July 2, 2019 7:00 a.m. EDT
spacecraft on the launch pad. Launch Site Cape Canaveral Air Force Station,
Florida, SLC-46
Duration 3 min., 13 sec.

Altitude 31,000 ft. (at abort initiation), 55,000 ft.

(Orion test vehicle maximum altitude)

The Ascent Abort-2 test vehicle is secured on the pad at Launch Complex 46 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida after rollback of the Vertical
Integration Facility on July 1, 2019.

Completed Flight Tests > Ascent Abort-2 50

 6
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

U p c o m in g
Mi s s ion s

Upcoming Missions > Ascent Abort-2 51

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Artemis I
Artemis I will be the first integrated flight of NASA’s SLS and Orion will blast off from Launch Complex 39B
new deep space human exploration system — the Orion at NASA’s modernized spaceport at Kennedy. The SLS
spacecraft, the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket, and rocket is designed for missions beyond low-Earth orbit
Exploration Ground Systems at Kennedy Space Center in carrying crew or cargo to the Moon and beyond. The
Florida — and will test our capabilities to orbit the Moon first SLS vehicle, called Block 1, will create more than 8.8
and return to Earth and set the stage for future missions million pounds of thrust during launch and ascent and
to the lunar vicinity. will be capable of delivering more than 27 metric tons
(59,525 pounds) to orbits beyond the Moon. Propelled by
During this flight, an uncrewed Orion will launch on a pair of five segment boosters and four RS-25 engines,
the most powerful rocket NASA has ever developed and the rocket will reach the period of greatest atmospheric
fly farther than any spacecraft designed and built for force within ninety seconds.
humans has ever flown. On an approximate four-to-six
week mission, it will travel 280,000 miles from Earth and After jettisoning the boosters, service module panels, and
40,000 beyond the far side of the Moon, demonstrating launch abort system, the core stage engines will shut down
the performance of both Orion and the SLS rocket on and the core stage will separate from the spacecraft, leaving
their maiden flight, gathering important engineering Orion attached to the interim cryogenic propulsion stage
data. Orion will stay in space longer than any spacecraft (ICPS) that will propel it toward the Moon.
for astronauts has without docking to a space station, and
return home faster and hotter than ever before.

Upcoming Missions > Artemis I 52

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

As the spacecraft makes an orbit of Earth, it will deploy its The outbound trip to the Moon will take several days,
solar arrays and the ICPS will give Orion the big push it needs during which time engineers will evaluate the spacecraft’s
to leave Earth’s orbit and travel toward the Moon. From systems and, as needed, correct its trajectory. Orion will
there, Orion will separate from the ICPS approximately fly about 60 miles above the surface of the Moon at its
two hours after launch. The ICPS will then deploy several closest approach, and then use the Moon’s gravitational
small satellites, known as CubeSats, to perform several force to propel Orion into a distant retrograde, or opposite,
experiments and technology demonstrations that will orbit about 40,000 miles past the Moon. This is 30,000
improve our knowledge of the deep space environment. miles farther than Apollo travelled during Apollo 13
and the farthest in space any spacecraft built for humans
As Orion continues on its path from Earth orbit to the has ever flown.
Moon, it will be propelled by a service module provided
by ESA (European Space Agency). The service module The spacecraft will stay in that orbit for at least six days
supplies the spacecraft’s main propulsion system and to collect data and allow mission controllers to assess the
power, and houses air and water for astronauts on future performance of the spacecraft. During this period, Orion
missions. Orion will pass through the Van Allen radiation will travel in a direction around the Moon opposite from
belts, and fly past the Global Positioning System (GPS) the direction the Moon travels around Earth.
satellite constellation and above communication satellites
in Earth orbit. To communicate with mission control at For its return trip to Earth, Orion will do another close
NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, Orion will flyby of the Moon that takes the spacecraft within about
switch from NASA’s Tracking and Data Relay Satellites 60 miles of the lunar surface, then use another precisely
system and connect through the Deep Space Network. timed engine firing of the service module in conjunction
From here, Orion will continue to demonstrate its unique with the Moon’s gravity to accelerate back toward Earth.
design in navigation, communication, and operations in a This maneuver will set the spacecraft on its trajectory to
deep space environment. enter our planet’s atmosphere traveling around 25,000

Orion and Artemis I Fun Facts

» Orion will be the spacecraft for crewed missions

during Artemis missions. The name for the Artemis » Orion will go about 40,000 miles past the Moon on its
program comes from the twin sister of Apollo and Artemis I mission. That’s:
goddess of the Moon in Greek mythology. Artemis » 15 times the distance from Maine to San Diego
now personifies NASA’s path to the Moon past the Moon
and beyond.
» 17 times the length of the Mississippi river past
» Orion returns to Earth at a speed of about 25,000 the Moon
mph from its missions. At this speed, Orion could
» When it lifts off for Artemis I, Orion will weigh 72,000
travel from Los Angeles to New York City in 6
pounds, as much as:
minutes, while a normal flight on commercial airlines
takes 5.5 hours. » 4.5 elephants

» When it comes back to Earth, Orion will travel: » 8.5 hippos

» 17 times the speed of a fighter jet » 13 giraffes

» 30 times the speed of sound » 50 cows

» 350 times as fast as a cheetah runs » 80 horses

» 200 pandas

Upcoming Missions > Artemis I 53

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

mph and producing temperatures of approximately 5,000

degrees Fahrenheit, testing the heat shield’s performance.

The mission will end with a test of Orion’s capability to

return safely to Earth as the spacecraft makes a precision
landing within eyesight of the recovery ship off the coast
of San Diego. Following splashdown, Orion will remain
powered for a period of time as divers from the U.S. Navy
and operations teams from NASA’s Exploration Ground
Systems approach in small boats from the waiting Naval
recovery ship. The divers will briefly inspect the spacecraft
for hazards and hook up tending and tow lines, then
  Teams work on the final processing of the payloads that will fly aboard
engineers will tow the capsule into the well deck of the Artemis I. Housed within the Orion stage adapter, the satellites – called
recovery ship to bring the spacecraft home. CubeSats – are roughly the size of a large shoe box and weigh no more
than 30 pounds.
Launch Date 2022

Launch Site Kennedy Space Center, Florida, may help NASA address Strategic Knowledge Gaps (SKGs)
Launch Pad 39B to inform research strategies and prioritize technology
Launch Vehicle Space Launch System Block 1 development of human and robotic exploration. Other
missions will be testing innovative propulsion technologies,
Orion Gross 72,000 lbs.
Liftoff Weight
studying space weather, analyzing the effects of radiation
on organisms, and providing high resolution imagery
Trans-Lunar 53,000 lbs.
Injection Mass
of the Earth and the Moon. Some of the CubeSats are
competing in the Cube Quest Challenge, vying for prizes
Post-Trans Lunar 51,500 lbs.
Injection Mass
for accomplishing such goals as farthest communication
to Earth from space. The CubeSats will be deployed after
Orion separates from the Orion stage adapter and ICPS
Secondary Payloads and is a safe distance away. Each payload will be ejected
with a spring mechanism from dispensers installed on the
The payload mass capability of the SLS and the unused Orion stage adapter.
volume of the Orion stage adapter that connects the
interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) to the
spacecraft provide a rare opportunity for small, low-
cost science and technology experiments to be deployed Artemis I Secondary Payload Fun Facts
into deep space. These secondary payloads, known as
CubeSats, are not much larger than a shoebox but contain » Deployment opportunities are along the upper
science and technology investigations or technology stage disposal trajectory.
demonstrations that help pave the way for future, deep
» The Secondary Payload Deployment System
space human exploration. International space agency includes an avionics unit, mounting brackets,
partners and universities are involved with several of cable harnesses, and a vibration
the CubeSat payloads. mitigation system.

» Weight Limit: 25 lbs. (11.3 kilograms) each

The Artemis I CubeSats are 6U in size. One U – or unit
– is 10 cm x 10 cm x 10 cm. The Artemis I payloads are » Size: 6U (4.4’ x 9.4” x 14.4”)
limited to about 25 pounds (11.3 kg) each. Several of the Equivalent to six 10 cm square units
CubeSats chosen to fly on Artemis I are lunar-focused and

Upcoming Missions > Artemis I 54

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Artemis I manifested payloads are listed below with their

provider, area of exploration:

Moon Earth

Lunar IceCube - Morehead State University, Kentucky EQUULEUS – University of Tokyo/JAXA, Japan
Searching for water in all forms and other volatiles with an Imaging the Earth’s plasmasphere for a better understanding of Earth’s radiation
infrared spectrometer environment from Earth-Moon LaGrange 2 point

LunaH-Map – Arizona State University, Arizona

Creating higher-fidelity maps of near-surface hydrogen in craters and
other permanently shadowed regions of the lunar South Pole with neutron
spectrometers

OMOTENASHI – JAXA, Japan

Developing the world’s smallest lunar lander and studying the
lunar environment

LunIR – Lockheed Martin, Colorado

Performing advanced infrared imaging of the lunar surface

Other Missions Sun

BioSentinel – Ames Research Center, California CuSP – Southwest Research Institute, Texas
Using single-celled yeast to detect, measure and compare the impact of deep- Measuring particles and magnetic fields as a space weather station
space radiation on living organisms over a long period of time

ArgoMoon – European Space Agency/ASI, ArgoTec, Italy

Observing the interim cryogenic propulsion stage with advanced optics and
software imaging system

Centennial Challenges Asteroid

Team Miles – Florida NEA Scout – Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama
Demonstrating propulsion using plasma thrusters and competing in NASA’s Deep Traveling by solar sail to a near-Earth asteroid and taking pictures and other
Space Derby characterizations of its surface

Upcoming Missions > Artemis I 55

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Space Biology
Experiments
Four space biology investigations will be carried in a Federica Brandizzi, Ph.D., Michigan State
container stored in the crew compartment of the Orion University, Life beyond Earth
capsule for the duration of the mission, as it passes through Effect of space flight on seeds with improved nutritional
the Van Allen Belts on the way to the Moon and again on value - This study will characterize how spaceflight effects
the way back to Earth. The experiments will study DNA nutrient stores in plant seeds with the goal of gaining new
damage and protection from radiation for missions to the knowledge that will help increase the nutritional value of
Moon, where radiation exposure will be roughly twice plants grown in spaceflight.
what it is on the International Space Station.

Artemis I provides an opportunity to study effects Timothy Hammond, Ph.D., Institute For Medical
from the combined environment of space radiation and Research, Inc., Fuel to Mars
microgravity. Beyond low-Earth orbit, cosmic radiation is This research will include studies with the photosynthetic
trapped in the Van Allen Belts that are part of Earth’s algae, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, to identify important
magnetosphere and can be dangerous to humans and genes that contribute to its survival in deep space.
other living organisms, as well as sensitive electronics.
The Moon is about 240,000 miles from the Earth, which
is about 1,000 times more than the distance from Earth Zheng Wang, Ph.D., Naval Research Laboratory,
to the International Space Station and offers a true deep Investigating the Roles of Melanin and DNA Repair
space radiation environment. All specimens will be on Adaptation and Survivability of Fungi
returned to the researchers for post-flight analyses after in Deep Space
the spacecraft returns. NASA selected investigators from Researchers will be using the fungus Aspergillus nidulans
four institutions for awards totaling ~$1.6 million in fiscal to investigate radioprotective effects of melanin and the
years 2019-2022. DNA damage response.

Luis Zea, Ph.D., University of Colorado, Boulder,

Multi-Generational Genome-Wide Yeast Fitness
Profiling Beyond and Below Earth’s van Allen Belts
This investigation will use yeast as a model organism to
identify genes that help organisms adapt to the conditions
of both deep spaceflight on the Artemis I mission, and of
low-Earth orbit on the space station.

NASA awarded these grants under the NASA Research Announcement NNH18ZTT001N-EM1 “Appendix A: Orion Exploration Mission-1
Research Pathfinder for Beyond Low-Earth Orbit Space Biology Investigations” which is part of the Research Opportunities in Space Biology
(ROSBio) Omnibus. The Space Biology Program is managed by the Space Life and Physical Sciences Research and Applications Division in
NASA’s Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate at the agency’s headquarters in Washington, D.C.

Upcoming Missions > Artemis I 56

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Matroshka AstroRad Radiation

Experiment (MARE)
Space radiation is one of the most significant hazards crews With two identical torsos, scientists will be able to
face on missions to the Moon and beyond. In 2018, NASA determine how well the new vest might protect crew
signed an agreement with Lockheed Martin Advanced from solar radiation, while also collecting data on how
Programs, the Israel Space Agency (ISA), and the German much radiation astronauts might experience inside
Aerospace Center (DLR) for an experiment to test the Orion on a lunar mission – conditions that cannot be
AstroRad radiation protection vest on Artemis I. The recreated on Earth.
investigation, called the Matroshka AstroRad Radiation
Experiment (MARE), will provide valuable data on Orion was designed to protect both humans and hardware
radiation levels during missions to the Moon while testing during radiation events on Artemis missions. For example,
the effectiveness of the new vest. in the event of a solar flare, Orion’s crew can take cover in
the central part of the crew module, between the floor and
The Artemis I mission will not carry crew, but two identical the heat shield, inside two large stowage lockers. Using the
manikin torsos equipped with radiation detectors. The stowage bags that were in the lockers, they will create a
manikins, called phantoms, are manufactured from shelter around themselves, putting as much mass between
materials that mimic human bones, soft tissues, and organs them and the radiation source as possible and making
of an adult female. One phantom, named Zohar, will wear it harder for solar particles to travel through. With a
the AstroRad vest, while the other, named Helga, will protective vest to help block solar energetic particles, crews
not. Female forms were chosen because women typically could continue working during critical mission activities
have greater sensitivity to the effects of space radiation, in spite of a solar storm.
but the AstroRad vest is designed to protect both males
and females. ISA will provide the AstroRad vest for the mission,
which was developed by StemRad, an Israeli company,
The phantoms have a three-centimeter grid embedded in collaboration with Lockheed Martin. DLR will
throughout the torsos that will enable scientists to map provide the phantoms and the majority of the radiation
internal radiation doses to areas of the body that contain detectors, with further contributions by universities from
critical organs. around the world.

  During NASA’s Artemis I mission, two identical ‘phantom’ torsos named

Helga and Zohar will be equipped with radiation detectors while flying
aboard Orion to measure the effects of radiation in space, and to test for
protection. Zohar will wear the vest, while Helga will not.

Upcoming Missions > Artemis I 57

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  The manikin flying on Artemis I will occupy the commander’s seat inside Orion, be equipped with two radiation sensors, and wear a first-generation Orion
Crew Survival System suit – a spacesuit astronauts will wear during launch, entry, and other dynamic phases of their missions.

Commander Moonikin Campos

The “Moonikin,” a male-bodied manikin previously used Campos will occupy the commander’s seat inside Orion
in Orion vibration tests, will fly inside Orion on Artemis I and wear an Orion Crew Survival System suit– the same
to collect data for engineers on the ground to evaluate and spacesuit that Artemis astronauts will use during launch,
fine tune crew conditions during missions to the Moon. entry, and other dynamic phases of their missions.

The Moonikin received the official name “Commander Campos will be equipped with two radiation sensors and
Moonikin Campos” as the result of a competitive bracket have additional sensors under its headrest and behind its
contest honoring NASA figures, programs, or astronomical seat to record acceleration and vibration data throughout
objects. The name Campos is a dedication to Arturo the mission. Data from the Moonikin’s experience will
Campos, a key player in bringing Apollo 13 safely back be used to help NASA protect astronauts during future
to Earth. The contest received more than 300,000 votes. crewed Artemis missions.

Five additional accelerometers inside Orion will provide

data for comparing vibration and acceleration between
the upper and lower seats. As Orion splashes down in the
Pacific Ocean, all accelerometers will measure impact on
these seat locations for comparison to data from water
impact tests at NASA’s Langley Research Center in
Virginia to verify accuracy of pre-flight models.

  On Artemis I, Commander Moonikin Campos will occupy the com-

mander’s seat inside Orion, while phantom torsos Zohar and Helga will
occupy the passenger seats.

Upcoming Missions > Artemis I 58

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  Flying on NASA’s Orion spacecraft during the uncrewed Artemis I mission will be Callisto, a technology demonstration developed through a reimbursable
space act agreement with Lockheed Martin. Lockheed Martin has partnered with Amazon, and Cisco to bring the Alexa digital assistant and Webex video
collaboration aboard Orion’s first flight test in deep space.

Callisto
Callisto is a technology demonstration developed through The payload will demonstrate how astronauts
a reimbursable space act agreement with Lockheed and flight controllers can use human-machine
Martin. Lockheed Martin has partnered with Amazon interface technology to make their jobs simpler, safer
and Cisco to bring the Alexa digital assistant and Webex and more efficient, and advance human exploration
video collaboration aboard Orion’s first flight test in deep space.
in deep space.
The industry-funded payload will be located on Orion’s
Named after a mythological Greek goddess and one of center console and includes a tablet that will test Webex by
Artemis’ hunting attendants, Callisto is meant to show Cisco video conferencing software to transmit video and
how commercial technology could assist future astronauts audio from the Mission Control Center at Johnson, and
on deep space missions. custom-built hardware and software by Lockheed Martin
and Amazon that will test Alexa, Amazon’s voice-based
virtual assistant, to respond to the transmitted audio.

Upcoming Missions > Artemis I 59

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Artemis II
Artemis II is the first Space Launch System (SLS) and mission, Orion and the upper stage, called the interim
Orion flight with astronauts. With confidence based on cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS), will then orbit Earth
the Artemis I mission and the thousands of hours put twice to ensure Orion’s systems are working as expected
into the prior flight and testing, this mission will send while still close to home.
astronauts on an approximately 10-day mission where
they will set a record for the farthest human travel beyond The spacecraft will first reach an initial orbit flying in the
the far side of the Moon. shape of an ellipse, at a low altitude (perigee) of about 115
miles by a high altitude (apogee) of 1,800 miles. The orbit
The mission will launch a crew of four astronauts from will last a little over 90 minutes and include an initial
Kennedy on a Block 1 configuration of the SLS rocket. firing of the ICPS to maintain Orion’s path. After the first
The flight profile is called a hybrid free return trajectory. orbit, the ICPS will raise Orion to a high-Earth orbit. This
Orion will perform multiple maneuvers to raise its orbit maneuver will enable the spacecraft to build up enough
around Earth and eventually place the crew on a lunar free speed for the eventual push toward the Moon. The second,
return trajectory in which Earth’s gravity will naturally larger orbit will take approximately 42 hours, with Orion
pull Orion back home after flying around the Moon. flying in an ellipse between about 235 and 68,000 miles
above Earth.
The initial launch will be similar to Artemis I as SLS lofts
Orion into space and then jettisons the boosters, service
module panels, and launch abort system, before the core
stage engines shut down and the core stage separates from
the upper stage and the spacecraft. With crew aboard this

Upcoming Missions > Artemis II 60

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  Inside the Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building high bay
at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the Artemis II crew module is
relocated into a clean room on June 10, 2020.

After the burn to enter high-Earth orbit, Orion will separate related hardware and software. This demonstration will
from the ICPS. The expended stage will have one final use provide performance data and operational experience that
before disposal through Earth’s atmosphere—the crew will cannot be readily gained on the ground in preparation for
use it as a target for a proximity operations demonstration. critical rendezvous, proximity operations, and docking,
During the demonstration, mission controllers in as well as undocking operations in lunar orbit beginning
Houston will monitor Orion as the astronauts transition on Artemis III.
the spacecraft to manual mode and pilot Orion’s flight
path and orientation. The crew will use Orion’s onboard Following the proximity operations demonstration, the
cameras and the view from the spacecraft’s windows to crew will turn control of Orion back to mission controllers
line up with the ICPS as they approach and back away at Johnson and spend the remainder of the orbit verifying
from the stage to assess Orion’s handling qualities and spacecraft system performance in the space environment.

  Technicians at NASA’s Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building at Kennedy Space Center in Florida move the Artemis II crew module from
its clean room environment to an external work stand, where the environmental control and life support system and propulsion system components are
assembled before installing them on the crew module.

Upcoming Missions > Artemis II 61

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  In Bremen, Germany, the Airbus Space team prepares the Orion European
Service Module-2 for shipment to Kennedy Space Center on Oct. 7, 2021.

While still close to Earth, the crew will assess the With a return trip of about four days, the mission is
performance of the life support system’s capabilities expected to last just over 10 days. Instead of requiring
and ensure readiness for the lunar flyby portion of the propulsion on the return, the fuel-efficient free return
mission. Orion will also briefly fly beyond the range of trajectory harnesses the Earth-Moon gravity field,
GPS satellites and the Tracking and Data Relay Satellites ensuring that—after its trip around the far side of the
of NASA’s Near Space Network to allow an early checkout Moon—Orion will be pulled back naturally by Earth’s
of the agency’s Deep Space Network communication and gravity for the remaining portion of the mission.
navigation capabilities.
During Orion’s return to Earth, the crew module separates
After completing checkout procedures, Orion will perform from the service module and begins entry, traveling nearly
the next propulsion move called the trans-lunar injection 25,000 mph. A series of drogue and pilot parachutes will
(TLI) burn. With the ICPS having done most of the work slow Orion down from Mach 32 to zero in approximately
to put Orion into a high-Earth orbit, the service module’s 20 minutes, ending a mission that will exceed 620,000
main engine will fire to perform the TLI burn that will miles. Recovery forces, already positioned at the target
propel Orion on a path toward the Moon. The TLI burn landing zone, will be ready to recover the crew from the
will send crew on an outbound trip of about four days Pacific Ocean.
to lunar orbit, with the service module performing orbit
correction burns as needed along the way. The crew will Launch Site Kennedy Space Center, Florida,
travel 40,000 miles around the far side of the Moon, where Launch Pad 39B
they will ultimately create a figure eight extending about Launch Vehicle Space Launch System Block 1
280,000 miles from Earth before Orion returns home. Orion Gross 78,000 lbs.
Liftoff Weight
On the remainder of the trip, astronauts will continue to Trans-Lunar 58,500 lbs.
evaluate the spacecraft’s systems, including demonstrating Injection Mass
return operations, practicing emergency procedures, and Post-Trans Lunar 57,500 lbs.
testing the radiation shelter, among other activities. Injection Mass

Upcoming Missions > Artemis II 62

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Artemis III
Artemis III will fly the first woman and first person of NASA intends to implement a competitive procurement
color to the Moon. This flight will be the culmination for sustainable crewed lunar surface transportation services
of rigorous testing and more than two million miles that will provide human access to the lunar surface using
accumulated in space on NASA’s deep space transportation the Gateway on a regularly recurring basis beyond the
systems during Artemis I and II. initial crewed demonstration mission.

On this mission, Orion and its crew will travel to the The exact landing site for Artemis III astronauts depends
Moon, this time docking directly with a Human Landing on several factors, including the specific science objectives
System (HLS) in lunar orbit, which will take the astronauts and the launch date. High-resolution data received from
to the Moon’s surface. NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has provided
incredible views and detailed mapping of the lunar surface,
The agency’s powerful Space Launch System rocket will including changes in lighting throughout the year. The
launch four astronauts aboard the Orion spacecraft for agency is working with the global science community
their multi-day journey to lunar orbit. There, two crew to study different regions that provide key desired traits:
members will transfer to the HLS for the final leg of their access to significant sunlight, which provides minimal
journey to the surface of the Moon. temperature variations and potentially the only power
source; continuous line-of-sight to Earth for mission
support communications; mild grading and surface debris
for safe landing and walking or roving mobility; and close
proximity to permanently shadowed regions, some of
which are believed to contain resources such as water ice.

Upcoming Missions > Artemis III 63

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  At NASA’s Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans, technicians from Orion prime contractor Lockheed Martin weld together three cone-shaped panels
on Orion’s crew module for the Artemis III mission that will land the first woman and next man on the Moon.

In addition to two crew, the HLS will carry up to 220 Launch Site Kennedy Space Center, Florida, Launch Pad 39B
pounds of science tools and equipment to the surface, with
Launch Vehicle Space Launch System Block 1
the goal of returning up to 87.5 pounds of samples. Also,
our Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) providers Orion Gross 78,000 lbs.
may be used to deliver pre-emplaced science instruments Liftoff Weight
and equipment for use by our first human return crew Trans-Lunar 58,500 lbs.
while exploring on the lunar surface. Injection Mass

After approximately a week exploring and completing

this historic expedition on the lunar surface, the crew will
board the lander for their short trip back to orbit where
they will return to Orion and their colleagues. With their
pristinely preserved samples from the Moon, the crew will
prepare for the trip back to Earth.

Upcoming Missions > Artemis III 64

 7
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

D e v e l o p m e nt
a n d T e s tin g

Development and Testing > Artemis III 65

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Johnson Space Center

NASA’s Orion program is managed at Johnson Space MCC and Artemis I
Center (JSC), where a team of engineers oversees the
design, development and testing of the spacecraft, as MCC is comprised of several flight control rooms (FCR),
well as spacecraft manufacturing taking place across the including FCR-1, FCR-2 and the Red, White, and Blue
country and in Europe. FCRs. Work to transform the White FCR from its shuttle
legacy configuration into a modern mission control
JSC has led human space exploration for more than configuration to support 21st century missions, known as
half a century. As the nucleus of the nation’s astronaut the MCC-21 effort, began in January 2013. The upgraded
corps, the home to the Orion crew, and the iconic White FCR is ultimately intended to serve as the mission
Mission Control Center, JSC plays a pivotal role in control for flights of NASA’s Orion spacecraft on missions
human spaceflight and enhancing technological and to deep space destinations.
scientific knowledge to benefit humankind. From the
Mercury, Gemini, Apollo and Space Shuttle programs to MCC is the facility from which flight operations personnel
the International Space Station, Commercial Crew and will remotely monitor and operate the Orion spacecraft
Orion programs, the center has been at the forefront of and receive data from Orion and the Space Launch
America’s human spaceflight. System (SLS) during Artemis missions. During Artemis
I, as Orion travels toward the Moon over the course of
several days, flight controllers will command Orion from
Mission Control Center the ground six times to correct its trajectory to ensure
the spacecraft can fly by the Moon at the correct time
Since 1965, mission control has been the helm of America’s and place. This includes trajectory corrections that enter
human spaceflight. NASA’s Christopher C. Kraft Mission Orion into the planned lunar orbit, exit that orbit, and
Control Center (MCC) at the Johnson Space Center in then return to Earth to splashdown in the Pacific Ocean.
Houston is the primary facility where flight controllers
command and control human spacecraft missions. Since The flight control team has been training for the Artemis
International Space Station assembly began in 1998, the I mission since 2019, by constantly refining and practicing
center has become a focal point for human spaceflight procedures they will use on the ground to monitor,
worldwide. The teams that work in mission control
have been vital to every U.S. human spaceflight since
the Gemini IV mission in 1965, including the Apollo
missions that took humans to the Moon, the more
than 110 space shuttle flights since 1981 and today’s
commercial crew flights.

  In mission control at Johnson Space Center in Houston, flight

controllers simulate part of Orion’s uncrewed flight to the Moon for
Artemis I.

Development and Testing > Johnson Space Center 66

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

command, and control Orion, and continues to do so until

several weeks before the mission. This includes performing
numerous simulations at MCC of the various parts of
Orion’s journey. Flight controllers at MCC train and
prepare by simulating Orion’s launch through outbound
powered flyby to the Moon, including the trans-lunar
injection (TLI) burn that sends the spacecraft out of Earth
orbit and toward the Moon. MCC also simulates Orion’s
orbit around the Moon and return powered flyby from
the Moon through entry, descent, landing, and recovery,
including the final trajectory corrections and burns Orion
will need to enter the atmosphere and splashdown in
  Teams perform communication testing between NASA’s Mission
the Pacific Ocean. Control Center in Houston and a lab at Orion prime contractor Lockheed
Martin’s facility near Denver that replicates Orion’s computer, wiring and
Simulations and testing have included joint operations avionics systems configurations.
between Lockheed Martin and the NASA Flight
Operations Directorate, with NASA teams doing real- MCC has verified these communication systems work
time monitoring and commanding of the Integrated with Orion during tests of different Artemis I scenarios,
Test Lab (ITL) Orion vehicle in Denver from the MCC including pre-launch countdown through the point at
in Houston. The ITL Orion vehicle replicates Orion’s which Orion data is relayed through the DSN, operations
computer, wiring, and avionics systems configurations. in lunar orbit, handover between the DSN and the Near
Testing has also been done with a low-fidelity Orion at Space Network during Orion’s trajectory from the Moon
the Exploration Development Lab in Houston as well as back toward Earth, and post-splashdown operations.
with the actual Orion spacecraft. Previous testing also verified communications through the
Near Space Network satellites and ground station at Cape
Engineers have also tested the Orion communications Canaveral, and also included support from personnel at
system to ensure the spacecraft and MCC can flawlessly the Huntsville Operations Support Center, also known as
communicate and send data through NASA’s satellite the HOSC, at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, to
networks in space and on the ground. To communicate verify they can receive data from the SLS rocket. Engineers
during Artemis I, MCC and Orion will use NASA’s at the SLS Engineering Support Center at Marshall also
Near Space Network, Tracking and Data Relay Satellite conducted voice tests to ensure teams across the country,
(TDRS) services, and Deep Space Network. The Near including flight controllers in Houston, launch controllers
Space Network consists of Direct-to-Earth services, in Florida, and engineering teams at several locations
which use a worldwide network of ground stations including in Huntsville can communicate by voice.
to provide communications and navigation services
during launch, as well as navigation services at various
points on Artemis I. Tracking and Data Relay Satellite Rapid Prototyping Lab
(TDRS) services provide near-continuous communications
services to spacecraft near Earth, and play a critical role The focus of NASA’s Rapid Prototyping Laboratory
during launch and low-Earth orbit phases of Artemis I as (RPL) located at the Johnson Space Center in Houston
well as during entry into Earth’s atmosphere, splashdown, is to define and develop the whole suite of over 60 display
and recovery. The Deep Space Network will handle formats and interactive controls for the Orion spacecraft.
Artemis I communications beyond Near Space Network
coverage, en route to and in orbit around the Moon.

Development and Testing > Johnson Space Center 67

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

The RPL team provides quick, creative, and efficient Finally, vibration units, driven by the audio, are mounted
solutions to an array of issues that engineers and astronauts to the chairs to highlight major events, such as booster
may face during missions. The team has used this approach separation and splashdown.
to streamline the more than 2,000 switches used on the
space shuttle into a new interface for the Orion cockpit, While simulations are being run on the prototype Orion
using just three display units, about 60 physical switches, crew interface display system, a mock mission control
two rotational hand controllers, two translational hand room is a few doors down, where flight controllers
controllers, and two cursor control devices. gain experience working and communicating with
the astronauts using the crew-vehicle interface system
This new interface not only eliminates mass from Orion, in real time.
but the software also makes it easier to operate the capsule
by automatically generating dialogue boxes to help The team works closely with a diverse group of engineers,
processes move along more efficiently. Astronauts on the system experts, flight controllers, crew, human engineering,
space shuttle relied on nearly 200 pounds of operating and Orion’s prime contractor, Lockheed Martin,
manuals to help them fly the orbiter. On Orion, electronic throughout the entire prototyping process to ensure
procedures are programmed into the system to aid the the operating system complies with human spaceflight
crew in daily and emergency processes, making these large standards. A demo at the Orion cockpit mockup is also a
manuals of system operations obsolete and saving the crew popular item on VIP tours at the Johnson Space Center.
time and space.

The RPL team prototypes these display formats as part of Systems Engineering
an integrated cockpit simulation hosted on various Orion Simulator/Reconfigurable
cockpit mockups around the Johnson Space Center. The
mockup is being used to provide a realistic environment
Operational Cockpit
for astronauts to evaluate the Orion cockpit and to practice
Orion spacecraft operations. It is used to implement The Systems Engineering Simulator (SES) at NASA’s
test scenarios to help decide on final design issues such Johnson Space Center is a real-time, crew-in-the-loop
as the types of controls during the different phases of engineering simulator for the space station, Orion, and
flight, organization of the display formats and navigation, advanced programs. The SES provides the ability to test
hardware selection and ergonomics, operational concepts, changes to existing space vehicles and flight software,
and display format specification and prototyping. test the interaction of a new vehicle system with existing
systems, create models of new vehicles (that may or may
The Orion cockpit mockup includes three display units, not exist yet) for engineering analysis, and evaluate display
hand controllers and cursor control devices for two and control concepts and modifications.
operators, and seven switch panels set up in an “on your
back” fashion to simulate ascent and entry into Earth’s For Orion, the SES provides simulation of the vehicle
atmosphere. All the controls in the mockup are functional with accurate six-degree-of-freedom equations of motion,
and connected to a simulation of the Orion spacecraft the Orion guidance, navigation, and control system, and
display suite. A half shell, recovered from another sensor and effectors; and allows for Orion engineering
project,provides a representation of being inside a capsule. studies such as proof of concept, operational feasibility,
Additionally, an out-the-window video taken during and design assessment. The SES also provides mission
EFT-1 is projected onto a screen outside the mockup shell, support and evaluation through procedure development,
giving users an idea of what the view would be like on training, and flight support.
the way to and from space. Audio files from the flight
test are synchronized with the video and played through
a surround sound system, to further immerse the users.

Development and Testing > Johnson Space Center 68

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  NASA Astronauts Stephanie Wilson, Jonny Kim, and Randy Bresnik take a look at the recently arrived Orion spacecraft simulator at the agency’s
Johnson Space Center in Houston on Dec. 8, 2020.

The Reconfigurable Operational Cockpit (ROC) is a The OMS is comprised of several components: Orion
reconfigurable cockpit mockup located within the SES and SLS Program-provided software simulations and
Beta Dome, a 24-foot-diameter hemispherical dome upon supporting files, Flight Operations Directorate (FOD)
which one continuous image is projected. This allows training systems infrastructure, user support tools,
crewmembers and engineers to perform tests, evaluations, network simulations, and crew station hardware.
or training in a controlled cockpit environment while
viewing a modeled external environment through the The SOCRRATES-lite (Software Only CEV Risk
cockpit windows. Orion cockpit simulations have been Reduction Analysis and Test Engineering Simulator)
performed with the ROC, which can simulate both seated and the ARTEMIS (Ares Real-Time Environment for
and reclined Orion cockpit positions and can use the Modeling, Integration, and Simulation) are used to model
dome visual system to simulate out-the-window viewing. both Orion and SLS, respectively. Both are deployed in
the FOD training systems infrastructure, which includes
computational hardware and data network equipment.
Orion Mission Simulator The infrastructure also provides a communications
and tracking network simulation) of various space to
The Orion Mission Simulator (OMS) is a full-task mission ground networks and allows the vehicle simulations to
trainer at NASA’s Johnson Space Center used to train crew communicate with the Mission Control Center (MCC) in
and flight control teams on Artemis missions. The high- a very flight-like manner.
fidelity vehicle simulations, which incorporate real flight
software, along with extensive malfunction capabilities,
provide these teams training on nominal flight activities
as well as complex malfunction scenarios, including
emergency events.

Development and Testing > Johnson Space Center 69

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

The flight crew uses the crew station to interface with the Space Vehicle Mockup Facility
vehicle simulations and with the MCC. The forward cabin
of the crew station is accurate in scale to the flight vehicle The Space Vehicle Mockup Facility (SVMF) at Johnson
for the pilot and commander, as well as all four windows Space Center provides spatially accurate flight vehicle
with high fidelity simulated out-the-window scenes. A mock-ups for engineering development, world class training
full-scale docking tunnel is also included and will be for space flight crews and their support personnel, as well
outfitted with a low fidelity hatch for rendezvous and as high-fidelity hardware for real-time mission support. A
proximity operation tasks. The crew station is outfitted major task of the SVMF is to support engineering and
with high-fidelity displays and controls and high-fidelity mission operations evaluations for the Orion Program. All
crew seats. A breathing air system is also included that will mockups and part-task trainers are available to support
utilize high-fidelity Apollo fittings to supply air to crew, as troubleshooting on the ground any time problems develop
well as a chilled water suit cooling system to support two on orbit in real time.
suited crew members.
The SVMF houses a medium-fidelity mockup of the
The OMS will offer the crew both visual and aural cues Orion capsule for support of future exploration. The items
to reinforce data seen on the display units. Sound bites inside the mock-up of the Orion cabin are accurately
from recorded missions will be tied to parameters in the placed within one inch of their location in the real flight
simulation: when a trigger is set, the appropriate sound vehicle. The mockup is currently used for development of
bite will annunciate. Simulated window views will also be components in the Orion cabin, assessments of interior
generated based on simulation parameters. These cues are layouts, and human-in-the-loop development and
important in providing the crew situational awareness. verification testing.

For Artemis I, the SOCRRATES and ARTEMIS A variety of training is conducted in the SVMF mockup to
simulations are run independently, and the crew station is prepare for emergency operations, on-orbit maintenance,
not used. For Artemis II, SOCRRATES and ARTEMIS photo/TV, stowage and handling, EVA/airlock operations,
will be integrated to run as a single stack simulation and and scientific payload operations. The mockup is also used
will be integrated with the crew station. The simulations for a variety of engineering and operations evaluations
will be modified as required to support future missions. such as on-board stowage evaluations, fit checks, and
procedures development and verification.

  At NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, testing takes place using

Platform 288” Platform + 132” Stairs =
the Orion mockup in the Space Vehicle Mockup Facility to ensure crew
420” L x 318” D x 167” H can get out of Orion within two minutes to protect for a variety of failure
Crew Station 190.94” W x 184” L x 125.95” H, scenarios that do not require the launch abort system to be activated.
fixed-base, oriented horizontally with
the seats looking forward.
Total Volume Inside 1005 cubic feet
Crew Station
Overall Artemis II Crew 420” L x 318” D x 242.57” H
Station Dimensions
Including Platform

Development and Testing > Johnson Space Center 70

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  During testing using the Orion mockup in the Space Vehicle Mockup Facility at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, engineers use fake smoke to
imitate a scenario in which astronauts must exit the capsule when their vision is obscured.

Human-In-The Loop Evaluations Seat Design

Human-in-the-loop evaluations, or HITL, are done at The design of seating in the crew module is tested to
Johnson Space Center to make sure Orion’s displays and ensure that the seats can work for anyone from the 1st
controls are operable for all mission tasks and the living to 99th percentile of body anthropometries – from a
space is properly designed for astronauts of all sizes. HITL 4-foot-10-inch, 94-pound female to a 6-foot-5-inch,
testing involves humans simulating and evaluating the 243-pound male. This includes testing the adjustable
tasks and interactions performed in the crew module, seat pans, foot plate, and arm rests of the seats and
extending the design process beyond 2D modeling. The adjusting hand controller mounts to make sure
wide variety of testing in different Orion mockups reveals that the smallest or largest of astronauts can reach
design and integration problems, and opportunities for all the controls.
cost efficient improvements.

Displays & Controls

Crew Vehicle Egress & Survival Operations
Orion crew module display formats (i.e. software user
interfaces) are frequently evaluated in HITL testing to Testing takes place to make sure the crew can safely and
ensure successful crew interaction for the breadth of tasks efficiently egress the capsule and includes modifying
required. HITLs have informed the design and operation hardware placement and operability. Timed emergency
of the Orion displays and controls, including the hand egress operations are also simulated to determine if time
controllers, switch interface panels, display format requirements are met using the emergency side hatch (or
legibility (including during vibration), off-angle viewing, tandem hatch) opening for pre-launch or post-landing
and design aspects such as switch guards, spacing, and egress. Egress testing evaluates the crew’s ability to exit the
strength to operate. This testing is performed in the most spacecraft from both the side hatch and docking hatch,
flight-like facilities possible in order to ascertain whether and includes many factors such as the ability to translate
the crew will be able to safely pilot and control the vehicle through the ocean to safely ingress a life raft in the event
given the expected avionics latency and system response, of an emergency on Orion.
and for any anticipated contingency situations.

Development and Testing > Johnson Space Center 71

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Habitability & Environmental Systems Suited Operations

HITL testing is performed on crew systems such as the HITL evaluations take place to test astronauts’ interactions
potable water dispenser and food warmer to ensure that with crew module interfaces while wearing the pressurized
the spacecraft is functional as a place to live as well as Orion Crew Survival System (OCSS) suit. Subjects don
work. Testing includes the crew’s ability to command the OCSS suit and the suit is brought to pressure to
changes to the atmosphere to maintain a safe and perform various tasks and interactions with hardware.
comfortable shirtsleeve environment, as well as the crew’s Suited operation HITLs are performed in either a flight-
ability to respond to emergencies such as a loss of cabin like environment, such as the Orion medium-fidelity
atmosphere or the response to a fire. There are many design mockup in the Space Vehicle Mockup Facility at NASA’s
controls to prevent these emergencies from occurring in Johnson Space Center in Houston, or in a pressurized
the first place. glovebox facility for tasks where only pressurized glove
interaction needs to be evaluated.
Net Habitable Volume
Speech Intelligibility
This HITL testing involves making sure there is adequate
room for mission tasks and configurations inside the This series of HITLs evaluates the crew’s ability to
crew module. This includes testing configurations of the communicate with each other and with the Mission
cabin for different mission phases, radiation shelter and Control Center on the ground in various configurations
sleeping bags, as well as testing exercise feasibility, suit that may be experienced during the mission. The HITL
donning and doffing, hygiene operations, and medical simulates the appropriate noise environment and sound
response. Net habitable volume is a key consideration in attenuation and then rates the subject’s ability to discern
Orion cabin design given volumetric constraints with words and sounds. Speech intelligibility testing is critical
four crewmembers living and working in that volume to ensure that crew can communicate effectively during
throughout the mission. critical operations, including launch, entry, and in
responding to emergencies.
Rendezvous, Proximity Operations, and Docking
(RPOD) Operations Handling Qualities

This testing evaluates tasks that will be performed in the This series of HITLs evaluates a pilot’s ability to fly the
Orion docking tunnel and vestibule area. This includes spacecraft. Testing is done to evaluate how the vehicle
docking preparations, docked operations such as arrival responds to hand controller deflections during manual
and departure, and evaluating ease of operation of piloting, and to understand whether the total system
docking hardware. Subjects also simulate the steps that (including displays and operator aids) allows the pilot
would be involved during the preparation and execution to maintain control. Handling qualities HITLs are
of rendezvous, proximity operations, and docking a critical aspect of human rating of the spacecraft, and
(RPOD) such as performing vestibule leak checks and they must be conducted in a very flight-like mockup
removing and stowing the docking hatch in a protective with accurate displays, controls, and software in order to
cover. RPOD HITL testing also includes handling yield valid results.
evaluations of ability to pilot Orion through RPOD
fly-around and docking maneuvers. HITL testing also
assesses contingency situations, such as the ability to
conduct emergency hatch closure operations in the event
of a micro-meteoroid/orbital debris strike, resulting in a
cabin atmosphere depressurization.

Development and Testing > Johnson Space Center 72

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Crew Module Uprighting System

When Orion splashes down in the ocean, it can settle in The five CMUS bags are inflated with helium gas that is
one of three positions: up, down or on its side. The crew stored in pressure vessels on the spacecraft throughout the
module uprighting system (CMUS) deploys a series of mission. Each bag has an independent inflation system.
five, bright orange airbags on the top of the capsule to After landing, the CMUS system is initiated and a valve is
flip Orion right side up in the event it lands and turns opened to allow helium to flow into the uprighting bags.
upside down. As the gas fills the bags, they deploy from their containers
and inflate to their full volume. The CMUS will deploy
The system will keep Orion upright and stable after regardless of the landing position of the capsule.
splashdown in the ocean and for at least 24 hours in
the waves, if necessary. It takes less than four minutes Several full-scale uprighting tests have been performed
for the CMUS to upright the capsule. The capsule must with a mock-up of the Orion crew capsule. These tests
be upright for crew module communication systems to demonstrated that the CMUS would still be able to
operate correctly, and to help protect the health of the perform as intended if any one of the five uprighting
astronauts inside who are returning home from future bags were to fail. This included seven tests in the calm
deep space missions. Astronauts can suffer health impacts water of the Neutral Buoyancy Lab (NBL), a giant pool
from extended time hanging upside down in their at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston primarily
seat harnesses. used for astronaut training. The Johnson CMUS and
NBL teams also successfully completed two tests off the
Engineers have implemented a series of improvements coast of Galveston, Texas, in cooperation with the U.S.
on the CMUS since Orion’s Exploration Flight Test-1 Coast Guard Cutter CYPRESS, Air Force personnel,
in 2014. During the flight test, three of the system’s five and Texas A&M Galveston. An additional four tests
bags did not properly inflate. The spacecraft landed and were performed in the Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of
remained upright in the water, however had the capsule Atlantic Beach, North Carolina, in cooperation with the
landed upside down, the two functioning CMUS bags U.S. Coast Guard Station Fort Macon and the USCG
would likely not have been able to fully upright the Cutter MAPLE. These tests demonstrated performance in
capsule. Design improvements that have been made since a natural wave environment and were instrumental in the
the test include thickening the inner bladder of each round certification of the CMUS. The nominal landing location
airbag to make it more durable, changing how the bags are for the Orion spacecraft is approximately 50 miles off the
packed, developing a hard enclosure for the packed bags, coast of San Diego.
and improving manufacturing processes for better control
and consistency.
  The Orion Crew Module Uprighting System (CMUS) and Neutral
Buoyancy Laboratory team completed two successful sea tests off the
The five bags that make up the CMUS are packed in hard coast of Galveston, Texas, from Dec. 1-3, 2018.
containers and stored atop the capsule inside the structural
gussets between the parachutes and other equipment. The
areas around the CMUS airbags have been evaluated
carefully for protrusions and sharp edges that could
potentially puncture the bladder or snag the bags or tethers
that keep the bags attached to the spacecraft. Changes to
spacecraft components have been made to minimize the
sharp edges and snag hazards, and full-scale testing has
demonstrated the CMUS can work well alongside the other
spacecraft equipment.

Development and Testing > Johnson Space Center 73

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  Off the coast of Atlantic Beach, North Carolina, engineers tested the crew module uprighting system (CMUS) to ensure the capsule can be oriented
right-side up once it returns from its deep space missions.

Neutral Buoyancy Lab CMUS Testing At-Sea CMUS Testing

Date Test Configuration Date Test Configuration Location
6/23/2017 5 bags 12/1/2018 4 bags (120° out) Galveston, TX
2/6/2018 4 bags (180° out) 12/3/2018 4 bags (240° out) Galveston, TX
2/8/2018 4 bags (240° out) 3/7/2019 Q* 4 bags (240° out) Atlantic Beach, NC
2/14/2018 4 bags (300° out) 3/10/2019 4 bags (120° out) Atlantic Beach, NC
2/16/2018 4 bags (120° out) 3/12/2019 Q* 4 bags (60° out) Atlantic Beach, NC
6/25/2018 4 bags (240° out) – FRB retest 3/15/2019 4 bags (180° out) Atlantic Beach, NC
7/10/2018 4 bags (240° out) – FRB retest

Development and Testing > Johnson Space Center 74

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

White Sands Test Facility

NASA’s White Sands Test Facility in New Mexico is a European Service Module
component of Johnson Space Center in Houston that tests Propulsion Testing
and evaluates potentially hazardous materials, spaceflight
components, and rocket propulsion systems for NASA The propulsion qualification module (PQM) test article,
centers, other government agencies, and commercial a replica of the service module’s propulsion subsystem,
industry. Since the 1960s, White Sands has been an was delivered by ESA and Airbus to White Sands in
integral part of every United States human spaceflight 2017. The PQM was designed to verify the performance
mission, supporting programs associated with the safe of the service module engines, propellant feed systems,
exploration of space and leading the way in propulsion and various other propulsion operations during expected
system testing. This includes testing of Orion’s European and unexpected conditions. Testing of the PQM is crucial
Service Module, the powerhouse of the spacecraft that for ensuring that all engines and thrusters fire safely and
provides in-space propulsion, power and other astronaut accurately to get the spacecraft where it needs to go.
life support systems, including consumables like water,
oxygen, and nitrogen.

  At NASA’s White Sands Test Facility near Las Cruces, New Mexico, a test using the propulstion qualification module (PQM) simulates what is referred
to as an abort-to-orbit scenario, a scenario in which Orion’s service module places the spacecraft in a safe orbit should a problem occur after the launch
abort system has been jettisoned.

Development and Testing > White Sands Test Facility 75

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

The PQM model is equipped with a total of 21 engines: The first phase of propulsion testing had no active
one U.S. Space Shuttle Orbital Maneuvering System pressure regulation of the propellant tanks, with testing
(OMS) engine, eight auxiliary thrusters, and 12 smaller conducted in a “blow down” mode in which the tanks
thrusters produced by Airbus in Germany. The Orion were pressurized prior to the start of each test. The
spacecraft that will fly on Artemis missions has 33 engines second phase included active pressure regulation. The
in total, double the amount of RCS thrusters included testing was divided into different campaigns and operated
in the PQM. various combinations of the engines to simulate flight test
scenarios, evaluate for engine cross talk or fluidic hammer
The full model is roughly a 15-foot cube made of stainless in the propulsion system, evaluate engine performance,
steel and provides the full components for testing the and test the pressurization cross feed assembly. Some
thrusters, fuel lines, and firing of Orion’s engines. The campaigns evaluated system performance with saturated
propellant for the PQM is provided by four 2000-liter versus unsaturated propellant, or the amount of helium
ground test tanks with 1-centimeter thick walls containing dissolved in the fuel and the oxidizer.
mixed oxides of nitrogen (MON) as oxidizer and
monomethyl hydrazine (MMH) as fuel. Other elements During testing, teams also successfully simulated the most
of the PQM include two helium pressurization tanks taxing situation the spacecraft’s engines could encounter
to achieve optimal engine feedline pressures; pressure- after launch. In one of the high-profile tests, engineers
control systems; a sensing and command system with performed a 12-minute propulsion test simulating an abort-
drive electronics; propellant lines with isolation valves, to-orbit scenario, in which the spacecraft’s service module
filters, and additional ground test instrumentation. The must place Orion in a safe orbit because of a problem after
facility was outfitted with a diffuser to enable pump down the abort system has been jettisoned. The test, which was
action to create a low pressure on the exit plane of the the longest ever continuous burn conducted on an OMS
OMS engine as it operated, as testing was conducted in engine to date at White Sands, used the PQM to fire
ambient pressure conditions. the Orbital Maneuvering System engine, eight auxiliary
thrusters and six reaction control thrusters.
In a test stand at White Sands, NASA and ESA used
the PQM to complete 48 hot firing tests and 3 discrete Over the course of this two-and-a-half-year test campaign
pressurization tests conducted in two phases and over 15,000 kg of MON (mixed oxides of nitrogen – or
concluding on Jan. 21, 2020. The data obtained during propellant-grade nitrogen tetroxide) and almost 9,000 kg
this test campaign was critical to the certification of the of MMH (monomethylhydrazine) hypergolic propellant
Orion/European Service Module propulsion system for were consumed.
the Artemis I and II missions and beyond. The focus on
these firing tests was the interaction between the engines PQM height, 4.6 m
and the propulsion subsystem, as well as the performance including frame
of the pressurization control assembly. Five additional Base dimensions 4.9m x 4.872m
hot fire tests were conducted utilizing the auxiliary PQM mass (empty) 12,000 kg
engines on PQM from Sept. 29 to Nov. 4, 2020. There
PQM mass (filled) 22,000 kg
were also isothermal and gradient tests conducted on the
pressure control assembly valves in 2020 that involved
chilling the valves and performing multiple cycles to see if
anomalies could be re-created. The first gradient test was
performed April 4 and repeated through April 21 of that
year. A second gradient test was performed on May 5 and
isothermal testing started May 12 and concluded June 3.

Development and Testing > White Sands Test Facility 76

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

PQM Testing
Date Test Length OMS-E AUX RCS

4/2/19 RCS Acceptance 11:49 N N Y

4/4/19 Waterhammer & Crosstalk Seq 1 12:32 Y (52 sec) Y Y

4/8/19 Waterhammer & Crosstalk Seq 2 13:57 N Y Y

4/11/19 Waterhammer & Crosstalk Seq 3 2:30 N Y Y

4/15/19 GNC Flight Profiles (ATO Light) 21:15 Y (15 sec) Y Y

4/29/19 OMS-E Feed System Test Seq C, Run 1ab 11:17 Y (5 sec) N N

4/29/19 Waterhammer & Crosstalk Seq 1 12:32 Y (52 sec) Y Y

5/2/19 OMS-E Feed System Test Seq C, Run 2 11:17 Y (5 sec) N N

5/2/19 RCS & Aux 5:10 N Y Y

5/6/19 OMS-E Feed System Test Seq C, Run 4 11:17 Y (5 sec) N N

6/20/19 Waterhammer & Crosstalk Seq 3 2:30 N Y Y

6/20/19 OMS-E Delta Qual Seq B, Run 2 11:32 Y (20 sec) N N

7/15/20 Waterhammer & Crosstalk Seq 2 13:57 N Y Y

7/17/19 GNC Flight Profiles (ATO Light) 21:16 Y (15 sec) Y Y

7/19/19 OMS-E Delta Qual Seq B, Run 1 11:32 Y (20 sec) N N

7/19/19 OMS-E Feed System Test Seq C, Run 3 11:17 Y (5 sec) N N

8/5/19 Full ATO Operation 23:21 Y (11.5 min) Y Y

9/9/19 Long duration Aux (TEI) 1:35:00 N Y Y

9/25/19 Waterhammer & Crosstalk Seq 4 13:57 N Y Y

12/5/19 Cross-Feed Test 1:50 N Y (70 sec) Y

(BOL, highest Aux regulation frequency)
12/5/19, Cross-Feed Test (BOL, highest OMS-E regulation frequency) (Runs 1&2 on 12/5, 1:40 Y (70 sec) N Y
12/10/19 Run 3 on 12/10)
12/10/19 Cross-Feed Test (BOL, highest OMS-E regulation frequency) (Runs 1&2 on 12/5, 1:40 Y (70 sec) N Y
Run 3 on 12/10)
12/13/19 Cross-Feed Test (EOL, lowest regulation frequency) 9:20 Y (530 sec) N Y

1/14/20 Aux Passenger Test 1 8:48 N Y N

(includes 1.65 MR test for EM III+)
1/21/20 Aux Passenger Test 2 5:05 N Y N

Development and Testing > White Sands Test Facility 77

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  An Orion boilerplate test article (BTA) drop test takes place at the Hydro Impact Basin at the Landing and Impact Research Facility at NASA’s Langley
Research Center on July 21, 2011.

Langley Research Center

NASA’s Langley Research Center is the nation’s first civilian Water impact testing is performed on Orion at the Hydro
aeronautics laboratory and the agency’s original field Impact Basin at the Landing and Impact Research Facility
center. Researchers at Langley work to make revolutionary at Langley. The water basin is 115 feet long, 90 feet wide
improvements to aviation, expand understanding of and 20 feet deep. The basin is located at the west end of
Earth’s atmosphere, and develop technology for space the center’s historic gantry. The gantry is a 240-feet high,
exploration. Langley sits on 764 acres in Hampton, 400-feet long, 265-foot wide A-frame steel structure, built
Virginia, and employs about 3,400 civil servants in 1963 and is where Neil Armstrong trained to walk
and contractors. on the Moon. The gantry provides the ability to control
the orientation of the test article while imparting a vertical
and horizontal impact velocity, which is required for
human rating vehicles.

Development and Testing > Langley Research Center 78

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Water Impact Testing Boilerplate Test Article (BTA)

When astronauts return to Earth in the Orion spacecraft, Engineers conducted three vertical drop tests and six
they will enter on an extremely hot and fast journey swing drop tests of an Orion low-fidelity mock-up, called
through the atmosphere before splashing down in the the Boilerplate Test Article (BTA), between July 2011 and
Pacific Ocean. To protect the crew on landing, water- January 2012. The BTA tests were used to shakedown the
impact testing evaluates how the spacecraft may behave in test procedures and to provide more than 160 channels of
parachute-assisted landings in different wind conditions data to assist engineers in the development of analytical
and wave heights. models. Then, another ten vertical drops of the BTA were
conducted in 2012 to measure the rate at which the loads
The Structural Passive Landing Attenuation for travel through the structure and help fine-tune the way
Survivability of Human Crew (SPLASH) project team at NASA predicts Orion’s landing loads.
NASA Langley conducted water-impact testing to provide
high-fidelity data of the forces that the Orion spacecraft Ground Test Article (GTA)
structure and its astronaut crew would experience during
landing, helping to protect the crew and informing After BTA, the higher structural fidelity Ground Test
future designs. Article (GTA), with the heat shield from the Exploration
Flight Test- 1 vehicle, was water impact tested between
April 2016 and September 2016. The GTA tests included
five vertical tests and five swing tests. There were 608
sensors on-board the GTA, compared to 155 sensors for
the BTA. Over 500 channels of data were collected for the
GTA including data on two anthropomorphic test devices
(ATDs), or automotive test dummies, since they are the
closest representation of the human body.

  The fourth and final water impact test of the Orion Structural Test Article was successfully completed at NASA’s Langley Research Center in
Hampton, Virginia on April 13, 2021.

Development and Testing > Langley Research Center 79

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

The ATDs were of a 5th percentile female (weighing 119

pounds) and a 95th percentile male (weighing 236 pounds),
representing the lower and upper range of astronauts. The
data taken from the ATDs was used to assess safety of the
crew and to calibrate and improve analytical models of the
Orion vehicle. The campaign of swing and vertical drops
simulated water landing scenarios to account for different
velocities, parachute deployments, entry angles, wave
heights and wind conditions the spacecraft may encounter
when landing in the ocean.

Structural Test Article

Based on the final design for the configuration that will

  On Dec. 2, 2020, researchers at NASA’s Langley Research Center
fly on Artemis II, NASA’s first mission with crew, the unwrap Orion’s structural test article to be used in a series of water
Structural Test Article (STA) built by Lockheed Martin impact tests that will prepare the final computer modeling for loads and
underwent water-impact testing at Langley in March- structures prior to Artemis II.
May 2021. The tests focused on the extreme limits of
Orion’s structural “twin” and less about reducing model
uncertainty, as the BTA and GTA tests were. These tests
looked similar to the previous, however, the STA crew
module is more flight-like in its configuration, with several
structural updates and modifications based on data from
wind tunnel tests and Exploration Flight Test-1. Three
vertical water impact tests and one swing water impact
test were conducted in this series. Data from the drop tests
will be used for final computer modeling for loads and
structures prior to Artemis II.

Boilerplate Test Article (BTA) Phase 0 and 1 Testing

Date Test Configuration

7/12/11 Phase 0 Test #1 (Vertical, rigid heat shield) 38.4° pitch, -0.4° roll, Stable 1

7/21/11 Phase 0 Test #2 (Vertical, rigid heat shield) 20.3° pitch, -0.5° roll, Stable 1
8/3/11 Phase 0 Test #3 (Vertical, rigid heat shield) 45.8° pitch, -1.0° roll, Stable 2

10/18/11 Phase 1 Test #1 (Swing, flexible heat shield) 40.2° pitch, 31° roll, Stable 2

10/27/11 Phase 1 Test #2 (Swing, flexible heat shield) 15° pitch, 30.5° roll, Stable 1

11/8/11 Phase 1 Test #3 (Swing, flexible heat shield) 15.8° pitch, 0.3° roll, Stable 2

12/1/11 Phase 1 Test #4 (Swing, flexible heat shield) 23.4° pitch, 179.6° roll, Stable 1

12/13/11 Phase 1 Test #5 (Swing, flexible heat shield) 26° pitch, -1.0° roll, Stable 1

1/6/12 Phase 1 Test #6 (Swing, flexible heat shield) 46.1° pitch, -1.1° roll, Stable 2

9/20/12 Phase 1 Test #7 (Vertical) 45.5° pitch, -1.8° roll, Stable 2

Development and Testing > Langley Research Center 80

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Boilerplate Test Article (BTA) Vertical Drop Testing

Date Test Configuration

8/23/12 Test #1 (Vertical) 2.24 ft., 16.4° pitch, -1.6° roll, Stable 1

8/27/12 Test #2 (Vertical) 2.24 ft., 16°pitch, -1.6° roll, Stable 1

8/28/12 Test #3 (Vertical) 2.24 ft., 16.4° pitch, 5.4° roll, Stable 1

8/29/12 Test #4 (Vertical) 8.96 ft., 27.1° pitch, -0.8° roll, Stable 1

8/30/12 Test #5 (Vertical) 8.96 ft., 28.1° pitch, 1.2° roll, Stable 1

8/30/12 Test #6 (Vertical) 8.96 ft., 27.7° pitch, -4.5° roll, Stable 1

9/7/12 Test #7 (Vertical) 8.96 ft., 27.4° pitch, -1.6° roll, Stable 1

9/12/12 Test #8 (Vertical) 24 ft. 10.75 in., 42.2° pitch, -0.2° roll, Stable 1

9/13/12 Test #9 (Vertical) 24 ft. 10.75 in., 42.2° pitch, 0° roll, Stable 1

9/13/12 Test #10 (Vertical) 24 ft. 10.75 in., 42.3° pitch, -1.0° roll, Stable 1

9/22/12 Test #11 (Vertical) 24 ft. 10.75 in., 41.8° pitch, -0.8° roll, Stable 1

Ground Test Article (GTA) Testing

Date Test Configuration

4/6/16 Test #1 (Vertical) -34° pitch, 0° roll, Stable 1

4/13/16 Test #2 (Vertical) -45° pitch, 0° roll, Stable 1

4/19/16 Test #3 (Vertical) -23° pitch, 0° roll, Stable 1

5/11/16 Test #4 (Vertical) -23° pitch, 0° roll, Stable 1

6/8/16 Test #5 (Swing) +26° pitch, 180° roll, Stable 1

6/24/16 Test #6 (Swing) -20.3° pitch, 0° roll, Stable 1

7/21/16 Test #7 (Swing) -50.2° pitch, 0° roll, Stable 2

8/4/16 Test #8 (Swing) -43.8° pitch, 30° roll, Stable 2

8/25/16 Test #9 (Swing) -26° pitch, 90° roll, Stable 1

9/7/16 Test #10 (Vertical) -15° pitch, 0° roll, Stable 1

Structural Test Article (STA) Testing

Date Test Configuration

2/11/2021 2/22/2021 Final waterproofing

2/22/2021 STA ready for WIT

2/23/2021 Weight & CG Test/TRR STA WIT/Clear RFAs

3/4/2021 Test #1 (Vertical) 21° pitch, 0° roll, Stable 1

3/11/2021 Test #2 (Vertical) 21° pitch, 0° roll, Stable 1

3/18/2021 Test #3 (Vertical) 21° pitch, 0° roll, Stable 1

3/23/2021 4/12/2021 STA WIT pre-swing test activities

4/13/2021 Test #4 (Swing) 43°-46.5° pitch, 0° roll, Stable 2

4/23/2021 5/6/2021 STA WIT close out activities/prepare/store to ship

Development and Testing > Langley Research Center 81

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  NASA’s Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans is an 832-acre site managed for NASA by the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.

Michoud Assembly Facility

For more than half a century, NASA’s Michoud Assembly space under one roof. Michoud is managed by NASA’s
Facility in New Orleans has been the agency’s rocket Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama,
factory and the nation’s premiere site for manufacturing with several areas of the facility used by commercial firms
and assembly of large-scale space structures and systems. or NASA contractors. Manufacturing and assembly of
The government-owned manufacturing facility is one of some of the largest parts of NASA’s Space Launch System
the largest in the world, with 43 acres of manufacturing and Orion spacecraft take place at this facility.

Development and Testing > Michoud Assembly Facility 82

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Tunnel
Seven Welds of Orion’s Pressure Vessel
Pressure Vessel Cone
Forward
Bulkhead PVC-1 D-E (hatch) to A-F (windows) cone weld

PVC-2 A-F to B-C cone weld

PVC-3 B-C to D-E cone weld

Three
Cone
Panels
Pressure Vessel
PV-1 Tunnel to forward bulkhead weld
PV-2 Forward bulkhead to top of cone panels weld
(becomes the forward structure)
PV-4 Barrel to aft bulkhead weld (becomes the aft structure)
Barrel PV-3 Closeout weld - forward structure to aft structure weld
(bottom of cone panels to barrel)

Aft
Bulkhead

Crew Module Pressure Vessel

Orion’s crew module pressure vessel, the underlying frame Once all the elements arrive at Michoud, they are welded
of the crew module that provides an air-tight, habitable together in detailed fashion. The cone panels are joined
space for astronauts during the mission, is assembled at with three welds to form the angled mid-section of the
Michoud by prime contractor Lockheed Martin. The pressure vessel where the windows and hatch are located.
pressure vessel is designed to withstand the harsh and Another weld connects the tunnel and the forward
demanding environment of deep space and is the core bulkhead, which is at the top of the spacecraft and houses
structure upon which all the other elements of Orion’s many of Orion’s critical systems, such as the parachutes
crew module are integrated. The pressure vessel’s exterior that deploy during entry into Earth’s atmosphere. Orion’s
is comprised of seven large aluminum alloy elements that tunnel, with a docking hatch, will allow astronauts to
are manufactured by two key subcontractors, AMRO move between the crew module and other spacecraft. The
Fabricating Corp. in South El Monte, CA and Ingersoll spacecraft’s barrel section, which is the largest single piece
Machine Tools in Rockford, IL. AMRO provides the of the spacecraft, is welded to the aft bulkhead, which is
pressure vessel’s three cone panels and Ingersoll provides the bottom portion of the vehicle, in order to form the
the barrel, tunnel, forward and aft bulkheads. aft structure. Technicians install Orion’s backbone inside
the aft structure.

Development and Testing > Michoud Assembly Facility 83

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

The backbone assembly is a bolted structure consisting The technique is also being used at Michoud to weld the
of nine pieces that are assembled prior to being installed massive barrels of the SLS core stage to make the more
inside the pressure vessel. The forward bulkhead is welded than 200-foot tall structure.
to the top of the cone panels in what is called the forward
structure weld. The seventh and final major structural Engineers undertake a meticulous process to prepare
weld, also called the closeout weld, combines the forward for welding. They clean the segments, coat them with a
and aft structures to complete the pressure vessel. Once protective chemical and prime them. They then outfit
welding of the crew module’s pressure vessel is complete, each element with strain gauges and wiring to monitor the
it is shipped to NASA’s Kennedy Space Center where it metal during the fabrication process. Prior to beginning
undergoes further assembly. work on the pieces destined for space, technicians weld
together a pathfinder, a full-scale version of the current
The Orion crew module pressure vessel is joined using a spacecraft design, in order to refine their techniques and
method called friction-stir welding. Friction-stir welding ensure proper tooling configurations.
produces incredibly strong bonds by transforming metals
from a solid into a “plastic-like” state, and then using a The pressure vessel for Artemis I was completed at Michoud
rotating pin tool to soften, stir and forge a bond between in January 2016, and the pressure vessel for Artemis II was
two metal components to form a uniform welded joint, a completed in August 2018. The Artemis III pressure vessel
vital requirement of next-generation space hardware. was completed in September 2021.

  On Jan. 13, 2016, technicians at Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans finish welding together the primary structure of the Orion spacecraft
destined for deep space on Artemis I.

Development and Testing > Michoud Assembly Facility 84

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Other Orion Components

Work on Orion structures at Michoud goes beyond will protect the service module from the environment
assembling the pressure vessel. The team provides design, during ascent, also takes place here. The same is done for
manufacturing, assembly, integration, and test capabilities the spacecraft adapter cone, which connects to the bottom
for key elements of Orion. of the service module and will later join another adapter
connected to the top of the rocket’s interim cryogenic
Other work on the crew module includes fabricating 227 propulsion stage (ICPS).
Avcoat billets (117 standard blocks, 57 thick blocks, 53
curved blocks) that will be used to make the heat shield. Structural components of the launch abort system (LAS)
The wall panels for the crew module’s environmental are assembled at Michoud, including two fillet panels,
control and life support systems (ECLSS) are also laid up, the motor adapter truss assembly, which connects the
assembled, and tested at this facility. The assembly and crew module to the LAS, and four ogive panels. The fillet
testing of the module’s docking hatch also takes place and ogive panels also undergo testing here. LAS tower
here, as well as the assembly of the four crew seats. components assembled at Michoud include the nose
cone and aft and forward interstage, the latter of which
Work on the service module at Michoud includes laying is also tested. Components of the raceway, which runs
up, trimming, assembling and testing 22 panels (six aft, the electronic communication lines through the system,
six forward, seven outboard, and three access covers) for are assembled here, including eight raceway covers, and
the crew module adapter, which will connect the service 24 access covers. Eighteen aero seals and 12 tangential
module to the crew module. The trimming, assembly, and fittings are also assembled at Michoud.
testing of three spacecraft adapter jettison panels, which

  The ogive panels for the

Artemis II Orion launch abort
system being assembled at
Michoud Assembly Facility in
New Orleans.

Development and Testing > Michoud Assembly Facility 85

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Engineers from Ames Research Center and Marshall Space Flight Center remove samples from the Orion heat shield that flew on Exploration Flight
Test-1 in 2014. The heat shield protected the spacecraft from temperatures reaching 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit.

Marshall Space Flight Center

NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Marshall also provides support to NASA’s lunar
Alabama, plays a vital role in the Artemis program and Gateway; making critical contributions to the Human
has provided significant fabrication and test support to Landing System program and managing all science
the Orion program since late 2012. Marshall is the lead payloads and science communications on board the
center for the Space Launch System and manages NASA’s International Space Station.
Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans, where the
core stage of the Space Launch System is manufactured.

Development and Testing > Marshall Space Flight Center 86

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Orion Work
More than 1,500 parts for the spacecraft have been Other contributions include natural environments support
fabricated in Marshall’s machine shop. The largest related to space and terrestrial environments including
machining effort was the dissection for analysis of the radiation, plasma, sea states, atmosphere, and winds; and
Exploration Flight Test-1 heat shield after its return to plume and aerothermodynamic analysis and consultation
Earth. The insulation materials contained in the heat as requested by Orion’s Vehicle Integration Office.
shield protect the crew during the return to Earth. State-
of-the-art machinery at Marshall was used to remove all Marshall also has performed various test series for Orion
the material for analysis, thereby confirming analytical including vibration, thermal-vacuum, pyro-shock, tensile,
models used to estimate insulation design and thickness and saltwater immersion testing. Numerous Orion parts,
for future flights. including the windows, were subjected to space-like
environmental testing in Marshall’s environmental test
Among the many component parts machined were clips, lab. This testing confirmed the ability of the hardware to
sleeves and rod ends used for unique connections on the withstand the harsh environment of space.
Orion spacecraft.
The launch abort system (LAS) integration and transition
Marshall also resolved processing questions on the Orion to production operations is managed by Marshall with
effort related to additive manufacturing. The field center’s Lockheed Martin as the prime contractor. Marshall also
advanced additive manufacturing laboratory helped to provides fabrication, production and assembly support to
define a process to successfully fabricate complicated NASA teams across the Orion Program, including the
parts, and shared the process solution with commercial Orion Production Operations Office. This effort includes
additive manufacturing shops to aid in 3D-printed parts integration of Orion and the SLS rocket.
fabrication for Orion.

The center also provides insight and oversight of

environmental control and life support systems (ECLSS)
for Orion’s Crew and Service Module Office. Marshall
assists Orion’s European Service Module Integration
Office by providing Orion isolation valve refurbishment
and Orion gas valve seat material testing, as well as
support for European Service Module propulsion
systems with subsystem-level hot fire test operations, data
review, verification-related review, and closure reports
and activities.

Development and Testing > Marshall Space Flight Center 87

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  NASA’s Orion spacecraft is prepared for its final set of environmental tests at NASA Glenn Research Center’s Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility in Ohio on
Feb. 21, 2020.

Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility

Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility, formerly known as Plum an environment to test electromagnetic interference; the
Brook Station, is a remote test facility for NASA’s Glenn Reverberant Test Facility, a 100,000 cubic foot reverberant
Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio. Located on 6,400 acoustic chamber; and the Mechanical Vibration Facility, a
acres in the Lake Erie community of Sandusky, Neil A. vibration table capable of testing an entire spacecraft in all
Armstrong Test Facility is home to four world-class test three axes. Major Orion-related tests have been conducted
facilities, which perform complex and innovative ground at the SEC, including the simulated space environments
tests for the international space community. testing of the Artemis I spacecraft.

The Space Environments Complex (SEC) at Armstrong

Test Facility houses the world’s largest and most capable
space environment simulation facilities. This includes
the Space Simulation Chamber, which simulates the
thermal and vacuum conditions of space, and provides

Development and Testing > Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility 88

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Environmental Testing Integrated Spacecraft Thermal Balance (TBAL) /

Thermal Vacuum (TVAC) Testing

The Orion program has leveraged the unique facilities The first phase of testing was a thermal vacuum test lasting
at Armstrong Test Facility to simulate environments the 47 days, while Orion’s systems were powered-on under
spacecraft will experience through launch, travel in deep vacuum conditions that simulate the space environment.
space, and recovery, as well as evaluate the spacecraft’s The spacecraft was subjected to extreme temperatures,
structure and systems in those conditions. ranging from -250 to 300-degrees Fahrenheit, to replicate
flying in-and-out of sunlight and shadow in space. To
An international team of engineers and technicians simulate these conditions, a specially designed piece of
completed three months of rigorous simulated in-space hardware, known as the Heat Flux System, was used to
environments testing of the integrated crew and service heat specific parts of the spacecraft at any given time. It
module from December 2019 to mid-March 2020 for was also surrounded on all sides by a set of large panels
Artemis I. This testing was completed in two phases inside called a cryoshroud that provided the cold background
the Space Simulation Chamber. temperatures of space. The testing ensured Orion’s systems
perform correctly in extreme flight conditions.

Integrated Spacecraft Electromagnetic

Interference/Compatibility (EMI/EMC) Testing

The second phase of testing was a 14-day electromagnetic

interference and compatibility test. All electronic
components have an electromagnetic field that can
affect other electronics nearby. This testing ensured the
spacecraft’s electronics work properly when operated at
the same time, as well as when bombarded by external
sources. The test campaign confirmed the spacecraft’s
systems perform as designed, ensuring safe operation for
the crew during future Artemis missions.

  Glenn Research Center’s Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility (formerly Plum

Brook Station) in Ohio houses the world’s largest space simulation vacuum
chamber where the Orion spacecraft, shown here on March 11, 2020, was
rigorously tested for Artemis missions to the Moon.

Development and Testing > Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility 89

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility Fun Facts

Space Power Facility

Reverberant Acoustic Test Facility
» T he Space Power Facility, or SPF, inside NASA’s
» T he Reverberant Acoustic Test Facility (R ATF) is
Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility in Sandusky, Ohio,
the world’s most powerful spacecraft acoustic test
houses the world’s largest and most powerful space
chamber. There are 36 concert-sized speakers
environment simulation facilities.
on the wall.
» T he opening sequences of the movie The Avengers
» The R ATF can simulate the noise of a spacecraft
were filmed at the SPF.
launch up to 163 decibels or as loud as the thrust of
» T hough it was built in the 1960s to test nuclear 20 jet engines.
propulsion systems, the SPF was never used for
» T he Orion spacecraft is tested to withstand the
nuclear testing.
acoustic forces of a launch or mission abort by
blasting the ground test vehicle with more than 150
Space Simulation Vacuum Chamber decibels of sound, which is what you would feel and
hear if you stood 50 yards from a jet aircraft engine.
» T he Space Simulation Vacuum Chamber is the world’s
» T he door to the R ATF weighs 675,000 pounds.
largest, measuring 100 feet in diameter by
122 feet high.
» The doors of the test chamber are 50 by 50 feet. Mechanical Vibration Facility
» T he chamber floor was designed for a load of » T he Mechanical Vibration Facility (MVF) is the world’s
300 tons. highest capacity and most powerful spacecraft
» I t is enclosed in a concrete chamber that varies in shaker system.
thickness from 6 to 8 feet. » The 4.5-million-pound concrete MVF seismic mass is
» T he vacuum chamber can simultaneously replicate anchored to bedrock using 104 tension anchors, the
the heat and cold of deep space. longest of which are 65 feet long.
» T he vacuum chamber, at ambient pressure, contains » T he vibration-simulation table is 22 feet wide and
30 tons of air (the equivalent of two large elephants). weighs 55,000-pounds. It simulates the shaking a
When pumped down, the weight is equivalent to one spacecraft could expect when launching on top
soda can pull-tab. of a rocket.
» T he vacuum chamber is made of the same amount of
aluminum required to fabricate 1 billion soda cans.
» T he vacuum chamber was used to test the airbag
landing systems for the Mars Pathfinder and the Mars
Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, under
simulated Mars atmospheric conditions. It also was
used to test critical components of the International
Space Station’s electrical power system.

Development and Testing > Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility 90

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Operations and Checkout Facility,

Kennedy Space Center
The Neil Armstrong Operations & Checkout (O&C) Environmental Testing
Building at Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral,
Florida, has played a vital role in NASA’s spaceflight Environmental testing, including thermal cycle testing
history. Built in 1964, the facility was used during the and acoustic testing, takes place in the high bay of the
Apollo program to process and test the command, service, O&C. Environmental testing is performed to simulate
and lunar modules. The facility is being used today to environments the spacecraft will experience through
process and assemble the Orion spacecraft. Orion is tested, launch, travel in deep space, and recovery, as well as
assembled, and readied in a large room in the O&C called evaluate the spacecraft’s structure and systems
a high bay, operated by Lockheed Martin, that functions in those conditions.
as a high-tech factory. The high bay includes unique
tooling stations, test fixtures, chambers, and clean rooms
for the buildup and testing of Orion.

The Orion crew module for Artemis I is blasted with 141 decibels of extreme vibrations during acoustics testing in the Neil Armstrong Operations and
Checkout Building high bay at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, simulating what the vehicle will experience in space.

Development and Testing > Operations and Checkout Facility, Kennedy Space Center 91
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Technicians assist as the Orion crew module for Artemis I is moved toward the thermal chamber in the Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout
Building high bay at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

Crew and Service Module Direct Field

Acoustic Testing

The crew module and service module undergo direct

field acoustic testing separately to ensure they are
prepared to endure the noises of launch and ascent to
space. During this testing, the crew or service module
is surrounded with speakers and exposed to maximum
acoustic levels that the vehicle will experience in space.
Engineers secure the module inside a test cell and then
attach microphones, strain gauges, and accelerometers
to it. The module is blasted with extreme vibrations
and acoustic levels up to 141 decibels – as loud as a jet
engine during takeoff – to ensure the spacecraft and its
systems can withstand the noise expected during launch.

Orion’s service module for NASA’s Artemis I mission completes acoustic

testing inside the Operations and Checkout Building at NASA’s Kennedy
Space Center in Florida on May 25, 2019.

Development and Testing > Operations and Checkout Facility, Kennedy Space Center 92
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Crew Module and Service Module Acceptance and

Thermal Cycle Testing Workmanship Testing
Thermal cycle testing is performed separately on the The Orion spacecraft undergoes assembly and testing
crew and service module inside a specially constructed in the high bay of the O&C Building to ensure its
thermal cycle chamber. Over several days, the crew or workmanship before ground processing and integration
service module is rapidly cycled between hot and cold with the SLS rocket.
temperatures to thermally stress the hardware and ensure
the workmanship of the module’s critical hardware
and its subsystem operations. Proof Pressure Testing

Engineers successfully completed a thermal cycle test on Engineers conduct a series of tests on the spacecraft’s
the Artemis I crew module in February 2018. The cycle pressure vessel, or underlying structure of the crew
of temperatures for the initial thermal test ranged from module. In a test stand inside the proof pressure cell,
29 to 129 degrees Fahrenheit during 105 hours of testing. technicians attach hundreds of strain gauges to the
Engineers successfully completed a thermal cycle test on interior and exterior surfaces of the vehicle. The strain
the Artemis I service module in December 2019. gauges measure the strength of the welds on the spacecraft
as it is pressurized at incremental steps over two days to
reach the maximum pressure it is expected to encounter
during flight.

Lockheed Martin engineers and technicians prepare the Orion pressure vessel for a series of tests inside the proof pressure cell in the Neil Armstrong
Operations and Checkout Building at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

Development and Testing > Operations and Checkout Facility, Kennedy Space Center 93
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

The Orion crew module for Artemis I is secured in a work station in the Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building high bay at NASA’s Kennedy
Space Center in Florida.

The tests confirm that the weld points of the underlying Crew Module and Service Module Functional
structure will contain and protect astronauts during the and Performance Testing
launch, in-space, entry into Earth’s atmosphere, and
landing phases on Artemis missions. Orion crew modules undergo initial power-on events,
which are the first time the vehicle management computers
Proof pressure testing was completed on the Artemis I and the power and data units are installed on the crew
pressure vessel in May 2016. module, loaded with flight software and tested. These tests
verify the health and status of Orion’s core computers and
power and data units, and ensure the systems communicate
precisely with one another to accurately route power and
functional commands throughout the spacecraft.

Development and Testing > Operations and Checkout Facility, Kennedy Space Center 94
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Orion service modules also separately undergo initial

power-on events. The initial power-on tests allow
technicians to check all cables are connected and data is
being transferred at the speeds required by Orion, as well
as the power distribution across the module.

In August 2017, the Artemis I crew module was powered

on for the first time. The Artemis I service module,
integrated with the crew module adapter, was powered on
for the first time in February 2019.

After initial power-on, the Orion crew module and service

module undergo separate functional testing, which
ensures each of the module’s systems powers on and
functions as designed.

After functional testing is completed, separate performance

testing of the crew module and service module takes
place, which verifies that each module’s systems not
only power on but are functioning at the correct
parameters. Performance testing also takes place after the
two modules are mated.
The Orion crew and service module stack for Artemis I is lifted out of
the Final Assembly and Test (FAST) cell in the Neil Armstrong Operations
Spacecraft Integration and Final Testing
and Checkout Building at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida on
Nov. 11, 2019.
After functional and performance testing takes place
on the crew and service modules individually, they are
moved to the Final Assembly and System Testing (FAST) The Artemis I spacecraft was then transferred to NASA’s
cell, where they are integrated and put through their Armstrong Test Facility in Sandusky, Ohio, where it
final system tests prior to rolling out of the O&C for underwent full environmental testing from December
commodity servicing and integration with the rocket. 2019 to March 2020.

Inside the FAST cell, the integrated spacecraft goes through The vehicle then returned to the FAST cell in March
a final round of testing and assembly, including end-to- 2020, to go through a final round of testing and assembly
end performance verification of the vehicle’s subsystems, prior to being transported to the MPPF in January 2021.
checking for leaks in the spacecraft’s propulsion systems,
installing its solar array wings, performing spacecraft
closeouts and pressurizing a subset of its tanks in
preparation for flight prior to being transported to the
Multi-Payload Processing Facility (MPPF). From July to
November 2019, engineers at Kennedy mated the Artemis
I crew and service module inside the FAST cell, where
the integrated spacecraft underwent functional and
performance testing.

Development and Testing > Operations and Checkout Facility, Kennedy Space Center 95
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Lockheed Martin Facilities

Development, testing, and assembly of Orion takes place Lockheed Martin assembles Orion (Artemis I & II)
at several different Lockheed Martin facilities across at NASA’s Michoud Assembly Facility and NASA’s
the country. This includes Lockheed Martin’s Waterton Kennedy Space Center in the Neil Armstrong Operations
Canyon campus near Denver, which has been a hub of and Checkout Building, and will soon be utilizing the
space innovation since the 1950s, and has more than new STAR Center, or Spacecraft, Test, Assembly and
4,000 employees and a wide range of industry-leading Resource Center, in Titusville, Florida, to build and test
design, manufacturing, and test facilities on site. large Orion elements for Artemis III and beyond.
Orion avionics and software testing also takes place at
Lockheed’s Exploration Development Laboratory located
in Houston.

Engineers complete testing on a duplicate of Orion called the Structural Test Article (STA), needed to verify the spacecraft is ready for Artemis I. NASA
and its prime contractor, Lockheed Martin, built the STA to be structurally identical to Orion’s main spacecraft elements: the crew module, service module
and launch abort system.

Development and Testing > Lockheed Martin Facilities 96

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Structural Test Article

In June 2020, engineers completed testing on a duplicate
of Orion called the Structural Test Article (STA), needed
to verify the spacecraft is ready for its Artemis missions.
NASA and its prime contractor, Lockheed Martin, built
the STA to be structurally identical to Orion’s main
spacecraft elements: the crew module, service module and
launch abort system, but missing critical non-structural
items such as the vehicle’s computers, propulsion, and
seats not required for these tests.

Testing deliberately took the vehicle’s structure to the

edge of its design, simulating the harsh environments that
physically affect the structures of the Orion spacecraft.
Invaluable to the mission, the tests on Orion’s “structural
twin” at Lockheed Martin’s facility in Colorado provide a
way to validate Orion structurally, and enable engineers to
push the structure past design standards.

The STA testing required to qualify Orion’s design began

in early 2017 and involved 21 tests, using six different
configurations — from a single element, to the entire
full stack — and various combinations in between. The
different configurations simulated the different flight
conditions, such as launch, return to Earth, parachute
deployment, water landing, etc. Orion will go through
during a mission. Teams worked round-the-clock for
days at a time to prepare the tests, execute, tear down
then reconfigure the STA for the next test, culminating
in 330 actual days of testing. During some test phases,
engineers pushed expected pressures, mechanical loads,
vibration, and shock conditions up to 40 percent beyond
the most severe conditions anticipated during the mission,
analyzing data to confirm the spacecraft structures can
withstand the extreme environments of space.

At completion, the testing verified Orion’s structural

durability for all flight phases of Artemis missions.

Forward bay cover jettison testing takes place on the Orion structural
test article at Lockheed Martin facilities near Denver.

Development and Testing > Lockheed Martin Facilities 97

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Structural Test Article (STA) Testing

Start End Config Test Component

4/11/17 4/14/17 PP Proof Pressure CM

5/27/17 9/8/17 12A Stiffness/Qual CM

7/10/17 8/21/17 6 Stiffness/Qual LAS

8/23/17 9/1/17 10 Modal ESM

1/15/18 1/21/18 9 Modal CM/ESM

1/26/18 1/30/18 3 Modal LAS/CM/ESM

6/11/18 6/14/18 13 Acoustic LAS/CM/ESM

6/21/18 7/11/18 4 Modal LAS/CM/ESM

7/24/18 7/24/18 15 Pyro Shock LAS/CM R&R

8/14/18 8/15/18 18A Pressure CM

10/29/18 11/16/18 5 Stiffness LAS/CM/ESM

1/15/19 1/31/19 18 Acoustic CM (FBC GAP)

5/1/19 5/1/19 19 Jettison CM (FBC)

6/3/19 9/13/19 7 Stiffness/Qual ESM

6/8/19 7/3/19 20 Pyro Shock CM (Mortar/Riser)

9/11/19 12/4/19 12 Stiffness/Qual CM

1/22/20 1/29/20 11A Modal LAS/CM/ESM

3/26/20 4/13/20 14 Lightning LAS/CM/ESM

6/1/20 6/1/20 16 Jettison CM/ESM (SAJ)

6/17/20 6/17/20 17 Pyro Shock CM/ESM R&R

7/31/20 10/9/20 6A Stiffness/Qual & Modal LAS

7/15/20 7/28/20 21 Pyro Shock CM (DMJS)

Development and Testing > Lockheed Martin Facilities 98

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

The Orion Structural Test Article, in its “full stack” launch configuration — the crew module, service module and launch abort system,
as well as the spacecraft adapter and jettisonable fairings — was lifted into a reverberant acoustic chamber at Lockheed Martin
for acoustic testing.

Development and Testing > Lockheed Martin Facilities 99

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Pressure Testing Pyrotechnic Shock Testing

Pushing and pulling with pressure that equates to 140 Shock tests recreate the powerful pyrotechnic blasts that
percent of the maximum expected loads during missions are needed for critical separation events during flight,
ensures the spacecraft structures can withstand intense such as the launch abort system separating from the crew
loads at launch and entry into Earth’s atmosphere. module after a successful launch.

Modal Testing Jettison Testing

During modal testing, dynamic loads of pressure Jettison tests mimic deployment mechanisms required to
are applied to the spacecraft structures. With more jettison the forward bay cover and to ensure components
than 20,000 parts making up Orion’s service module can endure the shock levels expected during flight.
alone, modal tests are needed to evaluate how all of the
spacecraft components hold up to vibration, especially at
connection points.

Stiffness/Qualification Testing Lightning Testing

Stiffness/qualification testing applies pressure steadily and Lightning tests evaluate potential flight hardware damage
continuously to the spacecraft’s structures. This tests how when the flight vehicle is exposed to a lightning strike
the structures will respond to the critical static loads it will prior to launch.
experience on missions.

Acoustic Testing

Orion will need to withstand incredible force during

its missions. Blasting the structures with sound waves
simulates the vibrating rumble of launch, reaching more
than 160 decibels.

Development and Testing > Lockheed Martin Facilities 100

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Integrated Test Lab

The Orion Integrated Test Lab (ITL) at Lockheed Martin’s The lab runs full mission scenarios from pre-launch to
facility near Denver simulates the flight environment to landing, or specific phases and events, in real time. The lab
test Orion’s avionics and flight software functions for has a fully integrated set of Orion’s complex crew module
both Artemis I and II. NASA teams have done real-time and service module avionics, power, wiring, and guidance,
monitoring and commanding of the ITL Orion vehicle navigation, and control hardware. The lab is the only one
in Denver from the Mission Control Center in Houston, of its kind that can integrate hardware and software across
during tests of the Orion communication system and all of Orion program elements, and the lab is also used by
simulations of Orion’s uncrewed flight to the Moon for other programs such as Space Launch System, Exploration
Artemis I. The ITL began integration for the Artemis I Ground Systems and the Flight Operations Division to
mission in January 2015. conduct integrated Artemis mission testing.

Tests performed using the ITL are essential for identifying An Integrated Test Lab rig configuration is the highest
software problems and validating proper functionality fidelity test platform that Orion avionics hardware and
and performance of the spacecraft avionics system. software would experience prior to actual testing regimens
Orion’s avionics and flight software functions tested at on the assembled vehicle. In this configuration, many
the ITL include ascent abort, safe mode, fault detection, actual vehicle avionics components are connected and
isolation and recovery, optical navigation, maneuver plan loaded with associated flight software. Appropriate vehicle,
management, and propulsion failure detection. environmental, and dynamics simulations, along with
actual and/or simulated sensor/effectors and stimulators
The ITL tests the millions of lines of software code provide as close to a “test like you fly” environment as can
with flight-representative engineering development unit be assembled within a lab setting.
avionics hardware in a flight-like configuration.

The Integrated Test Laboratory (ITL) has a full set of avionics, harnessing, sensors, and flight software identical to that on Orion. Using this real
flight-like hardware and software, the lab is used to simulate and test every aspect of the Artemis I mission from launch to splashdown.

Development and Testing > Lockheed Martin Facilities 101

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Exploration Development Lab

The Exploration Development Laboratory in Houston Elements of the spacecraft that take large amounts of floor
(EDL-H) is a state-of- the-art test facility initially funded space and that are built and tested outside the normal
by Lockheed Martin and its teammates United Space spacecraft assembly flow will be moved to the STAR
Alliance and Honeywell. The EDL was designed to reduce Center. This gives production teams more room at NASA’s
cost and schedule risk by providing an early opportunity in Operations & Checkout (O&C) Building to assemble and
the development phase of the program to perform systems- test more Orion spacecraft simultaneously and quicker.
level avionics and software testing for Orion in a realistic
environment. The EDL-H’s location adjacent to NASA The center’s work will start with the Orion Artemis
Johnson Space Center has enabled the Lockheed Martin III spacecraft, with many components already in
team to work closely with NASA early in the development development. The STAR Center will provide assembly and
and testing phase to gain clarity on requirements, including test of Orion aeroshell heat shield and backshell panels,
early involvement and collaboration with astronaut flight including thermal protection system installation; crew
crew members and flight controllers. module and crew module adapter wire harness fabrication
and testing; propulsion and environmental control and
Initial testing of critical systems is done in the EDL-H, life support systems assembly and testing; and electrical
including the guidance, navigation, and control (GN&C), ground support equipment production.
automated rendezvous and docking, crew interfaces, and
software development processes. Avionics system testing The facility features a class 7 clean room for spacecraft
was performed to reduce risk prior to Pad Abort-1 flight component assembly, a proof pressure cell for spaceflight
testing at White Sands Missile Range and Exploration readiness testing, and a 9,000-square-foot high bay with
Flight Test-1 at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center. EDL ceiling crane. It also includes nondestructive evaluation
testing also included system integration tests and mission and inspection capability, which allows team members
tests that employ the team’s “test like you fly” philosophy. to test and analyze materials, parts, structures, or systems
without damaging the original component, as well as a
The EDL-H houses the Houston Orion Test Hardware, separate machine shop.
otherwise known as HOTH, which is used to perform
early development, integration, dry-run testing of Orion The STAR Center is also integrated into Lockheed Martin’s
avionics hardware and software, and associated internal Intelligent Factory Framework (IFF), an edge computing
and external crew module interfaces using flight- platform that secures, scales, and standardizes device
representative flight software and an appropriate suite of connectivity through various IT platforms. This digital-
ground support tools, systems, and software. first approach streamlines production and maximizes
agility by connecting devices virtually. In addition, more
than 30 machines at the STAR center will be connected to
STAR Center this IFF, as well as machines at NASA’s O&C, giving all
production team members at both facilities real-time access
The STAR Center, or Spacecraft, Test, Assembly to valuable data. The center also employs remote access,
and Resource Center, in Titusville, Florida, is a monitoring and alerting technologies for equipment, plus
Lockheed Martin production center for Orion smart tools such as virtual reality and augmented reality.
spacecraft that will fly on Artemis III and beyond. The
center provides urgently needed space to expand and
streamline manufacturing capacity.

Development and Testing > Lockheed Martin Facilities 102

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Other Facilities
Testing
Launch Abort Motor Testing

The launch abort system motors are being rigorously tested

before the first crewed launch of Orion on Artemis II. The
abort motor, attitude control motor, and jettison motor
have each completed final qualification testing. These tests
look at the maximum high and low temperature conditions
that a motor might see during a launch in Florida. They
provide the data on how the motor reacts under hot or
cold stressing conditions. All three motors were also
flight tested during the Ascent Abort-2 demonstration   Engineers successfully perform a ground firing static test of the
in July 2019. abort motor for the Orion spacecraft launch abort system a at Northrop
Grumman facility in Promontory, Utah, on June 15, 2017.
Abort Motor

The 17-foot-long, three-foot-diameter abort motor has a Weight 7,600 lbs.

manifold with four exhaust nozzles and provides thrust to includes 4,500 lbs. propellant
quickly pull the crew module to safety if problems develop 400,000 lbs. peak thrust
during launch. The high-impulse motor is designed to Fuel Type Solid Fuel - hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene
burn most of the propellant within the first three seconds (HTPB)
and burns three times faster than a typical motor of this
Burn Duration About 3 sec.
size to immediately deliver the thrust needed to pull the
crew module to safety. If needed during a launch mishap,
the crew module would accelerate from zero to 400-500
mph in two seconds. The motor was built by Northrop
Grumman and tested at its facilities in Promontory, Utah.

During a series of static-fire tests, the motor was fastened

to a vertical test stand with its nozzles pointed toward
the sky. Upon ignition, the abort motor fired for five
seconds with the exhaust plume flames reaching up
to 100 feet in height. As expected, the motor reached
approximately 400,000 pounds of thrust in one-eighth
of a second – enough thrust to lift 66 large SUVs off
the ground. The tests verified the motor can fire within
milliseconds when needed and will work as expected
under extreme temperatures.

Development and Testing > Other Facilities Testing 103

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

The first test, called Qualification Motor-1 (QM-1), took The third and final test, Qualification Motor-3 (QM-3),
place under high temperatures, with a target temperature took place under ambient conditions, or the conditions
of 100 degrees Fahrenheit. The test confirmed the system of the naturally surrounding environment. The test
performed as intended under the maximum temperature confirmed the system can perform as intended under
conditions a motor might experience during a launch. average temperature conditions a motor might experience
during a launch. The Orion program made a strategic
The second test, Qualification Motor-2 (QM-2), took decision to delay this test to incorporate new insulator
place under cold temperatures, with a target temperature material, called EPDM rubber. The high-performance
of 27 degrees Fahrenheit. The test confirmed the system rubber insulation is glued to the inside of the motor casing
performed as intended under the minimum temperature and the propellent is poured inside. Following this test,
conditions a motor might experience during a launch. the LAS was officially qualified for flight with crew.

Abort Motor Testing in Promontory, UT

QM-1 June 15, 2017 Hot Condition 100°F

QM-2 Dec. 13, 2018 Cold Condition 27°F

QM-3 March 31, 2022 Ambient Condition

(Motor with new insulation)

  NASA, Northrop Grumman, and Lockheed Martin successfully perform a ground firing static test of the abort motor for the Orion spacecraft launch
abort system at Northrop’s facility in Promontory, Utah, on Dec. 13, 2018.

Development and Testing > Other Facilities Testing 104

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Attitude Control Motor

The attitude control motor steers the Orion crew module

to safety and orients it with the heat shield facing the
Earth in the case of an emergency. The motor is essential
because it helps stabilize Orion and control its trajectory
as it moves away from the rocket.

Built by Northrop Grumman and tested at their facility in

Elkton, Maryland, the attitude control motor consists of
a solid propellant gas generator and eight equally spaced
valves capable of providing 7,000 pounds of thrust in any
direction. The unique valve control system enables each
valve to open and close, directing the flow of gas.

The attitude control motor has undergone three   Engineers conduct a static hot-fire test of the Orion spacecraft’s
qualification tests. During each of the three 30-second launch abort system attitude control motor at a Northrop Grumman facility
hot-fire tests, the motor’s eight high-pressure valves on March 20, 2019 in Elkton, Maryland.

directed more than 7,000 pounds of thrust in multiple

directions, proving the motor can provide enough force to The first test, Qualification Motor-1 (QM-1), took place
orient Orion and its crew for a safe landing. under ambient temperature conditions, or the conditions of
the naturally surrounding environment, at approximately
70 degrees Fahrenheit. The test confirmed the system
Weight 1,700 lbs.
performed as intended under average temperature
includes 650 lbs. propellant
conditions a motor might experience during a launch.
7,000 lbs. thrust
Fuel Type Solid Fuel - carboxyl-terminated The second test, Qualification Motor-2 (QM-2), took
polybutadiene (CTPB) place under hot conditions at approximately 94 degrees
Burn Duration About 30 sec. Fahrenheit. The test confirmed the system performed as
intended under the maximum temperature conditions
this motor might experience during a launch.

The third test, Qualification Motor-3 (QM-3), took

place under cold conditions at approximately 30 degrees
Fahrenheit. To demonstrate worst case conditions, the
motor was ignited using one of two initiators and simulated
high altitude vacuum conditions. The test confirmed
the system performed as intended under the minimum
temperature conditions a motor might experience during
a launch.
Attitude Control Motor Testing in Elkton, MD
QM-1 March 20, 2019 Ambient Condition 70°F

QM-2 Aug. 22, 2019 Hot Condition 94°F

QM-3 Feb. 25, 2020 Cold Condition 30°F

Development and Testing > Other Facilities Testing 105

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Jettison Motor

In the event of an emergency, the jettison motor ignites to The first test, called Qualification Motor-1 (QM-1),
separate Orion’s LAS structure from the spacecraft, which took place under high temperatures, at 105.9 degrees
could then deploy its parachutes for a safe landing. During Fahrenheit. The test confirmed the system performed as
a nominal mission, the jettison motor activates after stage- intended under the maximum temperature conditions a
two ignition to separate the LAS from the spacecraft as motor might experience during a launch.
the crew members continue their journey. This critical
task makes it the only motor on the LAS to fire on every The second test, Qualification Motor-2 (QM-2), took
mission. The motor was built by Aerojet Rocketdyne and place under cold temperatures, at 23.6 degrees Fahrenheit.
tested by engineers at the U.S. Army Redstone Test Center The test confirmed the system performed as intended
on Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Alabama. under the minimum temperature conditions a motor
might experience during a launch.
During each 1.5 second hot-fire test, the jettison motor
successfully produced more than 40,000 pounds of thrust The third test, Qualification Motor-3 (QM-3), took place
in different conditions it might encounter during launch. under ambient temperature conditions, or the conditions
of the naturally surrounding environment, at 73.1 degrees
Weight 900 lbs. Fahrenheit. The test confirmed the system performed as
includes 360 lbs. propellant intended under average temperature conditions a motor
40,000 lbs. thrust might experience during a launch.
Fuel Type Solid Fuel - hydroxyl-terminated
polybutadiene (HTPB)
Burn Duration About 1.5 sec.

  Engineers perform a hot-fire test of the jettison motor for the Orion spacecraft’s launch abort system at the U.S. Army Redstone Test Center on
Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Alabama on Feb. 25, 2020.

Development and Testing > Other Facilities Testing 106

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  Aerojet Rocketdynes completes a demonstration test on Aug. 28, 2019, with the first jettison motor for the Orion spacecraft’s launch abort system
that utilized Aerojet’s Orange, Virginia facility for propellant mixing and loading and motor final assembly.

Aerojet Rocketdyne also completed a demonstration test Jettison Motor Testing in Redstone Arsenal, AL
on Aug. 28, 2019 with the first jettison motor that utilized QM-1 March 20, 2019 Ambient Condition 70°F
Aerojet Rocketdyne’s Orange, Virginia, facility for
QM-2 August 22, 2019 Hot Condition 94°F
propellant mixing and loading and motor final assembly.
The Demonstration Motor-4, or DM-4 test, rounded QM-3 Feb. 25, 2020 Cold Condition 30°F
out an extensive two-year transition effort that increased
affordability and demonstrated that there was no loss of
fidelity or quality in the transfer of the program from
California to Virginia.

Development and Testing > Other Facilities Testing 107

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Parachute Testing
Orion’s parachute system is designed to ensure a safe
landing for astronauts returning from deep space missions
to Earth in the crew module at speeds exceeding 25,000
mph. While the Earth’s atmosphere acting on Orion’s heat
shield will initially slow the spacecraft down to 325 mph,
the parachutes are needed to get to a safe landing speed of
20 mph or less, making it a critical system.

The parachute system includes 11 parachutes that begin

deploying at just under five miles in altitude. A series
of cannon-like mortars fire to deploy three of the four
parachute types, pyrotechnic riser cutters, and more than
13 miles of Kevlar lines attaching the top of the spacecraft
to 36,000 square feet of parachute canopy material.
Within 10 minutes of descent through Earth’s atmosphere,
everything must deploy and assemble itself in a precise
sequence to slow Orion and its crew for splashdown in   Engineers complete the final test to qualify Orion’s parachute system
the ocean. The parachute system also must be able to keep for flights with astronauts at the U.S. Army’s Yuma Proving Ground in
the crew safe in several failure scenarios, such as mortar Arizona on Sept. 12, 2018.
failures that prevent a single parachute to deploy, launch
vehicle aborts, or other conditions that produce loads The Parachute Compartment Drop Test Vehicle
close to the maximum material capability. Each of Orion’s (PCDTV), an aerodynamically stable dart-shaped test
main parachutes weigh 270 pounds and is packed to the vehicle, was used to provide high dynamic pressure test
density of oak wood to fit in the top part of the spacecraft, conditions. The Parachute Test Vehicle (PTV), a less
but once fully inflated, the three mains cover almost an stable, capsule-shaped test vehicle, was used more often
entire football field. and provided flight-like wake environments during tests.

The system underwent 17 developmental and eight While airdrop testing was a vital, and very visible,
qualification tests at the U.S. Army’s Yuma Proving Grounds component to the development of Orion’s parachutes,
in Arizona. The Engineering Development Unit (EDU) ground testing and analysis were equally important
test series ran from 2011 to 2016 and tested parachute to ensure success. Airdrop testing is expensive, time-
system design data. During the development series, consuming, and cannot physically reach all possible
engineers tested different types of failure scenarios and spaceflight deployment conditions, but its data helped
extreme descent conditions to refine the design and ensure generate computer models of parachute performance and
allowed the team to evaluate the parachutes in altitude and
Orion’s parachutes will work in a variety of circumstances. airspeed regimes that were unable to be thoroughly drop
Qualification airdrop and ground testing took place tested. Repeated simulation of the parachutes with varied
from 2016 to 2018. During the qualification testing, parameters, called the Monte Carlo method, allowed the
engineers evaluated the performance of the parachute team to estimate the bounds of what parachute loads
system during normal landing sequences as well as several and performance should be expected throughout the life
failure scenarios and a variety of potential aerodynamic of the program.
conditions to ensure astronauts can return safely from
deep space missions.

Development and Testing > Other Facilities Testing 108

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Ground testing of material capabilities was coupled Three pilot parachutes used to lift and deploy the main
with the parachute simulations to determine how parachutes from the crew module forward bay. They are
much structural margin exists in the system. This mortar deployed from the crew module forward bay at 112
combination of ground tests, airdrop tests, and feet per second (76 mph) minimum muzzle velocity. The
analysis qualified the system for Artemis flights with pilots are packed using a hydraulic press for convenience
astronauts. Orion’s parachute system consists of: but are much lower density and can be “hand packed”
Three forward bay cover parachutes (FBCP) used in if required.
conjunction with pyrotechnic linear thrusters to ensure
separation of the forward bay cover (FBC), which Three main parachutes used to slow the crew module
protects Orion and its parachutes during the heat of entry for landing to a speed that ensures astronaut safety. The
into Earth’s atmosphere. The FBCP are packed using a mains are packed using a hydraulic press, with forces as
hydraulic press, with forces as high as 3,000 pounds. high as 50,000 pounds. They are autoclaved with a vac-
uum applied to the parachute at 190 degrees Fahrenheit
Two drogue parachutes used to slow and stabilize the crew for 48 hours to help “set” the packing and remove
module during descent and establish proper conditions atmospheric moisture.
for main parachute deployment to follow. The drogues are
mortar deployed from the crew module forward bay at 100 The parachute system was developed and tested by NASA
feet per second (68 mph) minimum muzzle velocity. The and the agency’s contractor partners. Parachutes are
drogues are packed using a hydraulic press, with forces as designed and fabricated by Airborne Systems in Santa Ana,
high as 10,000 pounds. California; the mortars are provided through Lockheed
Martin by General Dynamics Ordinance & Tactical
Systems, located in Seattle; and project management is
performed by Jacobs Engineering’s Engineering Science
Contract Group in Houston.

Parachute Fun Facts

» The Earth’s atmosphere slows Orion down from 25,000 mph to about 325 mph during entry, but parachutes will
slow it down the rest of the way to about 17 mph for a gentle splashdown in the ocean.
» The parachute system has a total of 11 parachutes, and they all have to work carefully together.
» There are three 7 ft. forward bay cover parachutes that remove the forward bay cover, two 23 ft. drogue
parachutes that slow and stabilize the crew module and three 11 ft. pilot parachutes that help to deploy the
three 116 ft. main parachutes.
» The diameter of the three main parachutes combined would cover a football field from 10-yard line to
10-yard line.
» Each main parachute has 80 suspension lines. Each suspension line is rated to carry at least 1,500 lbs., which
is strong enough to hold 6 adults with some margin to spare.
» The suspension lines on the three main parachutes combined are approximately 10 miles total length.
» The main parachutes are packed using a hydraulic press, using forces as high as 50,000 lbs. Their density is
approximately 44 lbs. per cubic foot, which is roughly the same density as oak (and a much higher density
than pine).

Development and Testing > Other Facilities Testing 109

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Parachute Quick Facts

Three Forward Bay Cover Parachutes (FBCP) Three Pilot Parachutes
Diameter 7 ft. Diameter 10 ft.

Length 100 ft. Length 70 ft.

Weight 8 lbs. each Weight 9 lbs. each

Material All Kevlar materials Material Kevlar and Nylon materials

Deployment 26,500 ft. Deployment 9,500 ft.

Altitude Altitude
Deployment 475 ft. per sec. (324 mph) Deployment 190 ft. per sec. (130 mph)
Vehicle Speed Vehicle Speed
Density Approx. 49 lbs. per cubic ft. Density Approx. 35 lbs. per cubic ft.
(roughly the same as oak) (roughly the same as pine)
Final Packed Size 7.2” by 6.9” Final Packed Size 6.8” by 13.3”
(0.16 cubic ft.) cylinder (0.3 cubic ft.) cylinder

Two Drogue Parachutes Three Main Parachutes

Diameter 23 ft. Diameter 116 ft.

Length 100 ft. Length 220 ft.

Weight 60 lbs. each Weight 270 lbs. each

Material Kevlar and Nylon materials Material Kevlar and Nylon materials

Deployment 25,000 ft. Deployment 9,000 ft.

Altitude Altitude
Deployment 450 ft. per sec. (307 mph) Deployment 190 ft. per sec. (130 mph)
Vehicle Speed Vehicle Speed
Density Approx. 40 lbs. per cubic ft. Density Approx. 44 lbs. per cubic ft.
(roughly the same as oak) (roughly the same as oak)
Final Packed Size 16.5” by 16.2” Final Packed Size Approx. 7 cubic ft. irregular shape to fit into
(2 cubic ft.) cylinder the vehicle forward bay

Development and Testing > Parachute Quick Facts 110

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Parachute Engineering Development Drop Testing

Number Date Vehicle Alt. Parachute # in Cluster Primary Test Objective(s)
FBC Drogue Pilot Main
CDT 3-1 09/21/11 PCDTV 25 kft - 2 3 3 Nominal system

CDT 3-2 12/20/11 PCDTV 25 kft - 2 2 2 Drogue skip 2nd, Pilot & Main fail to deploy

CDT 3-3 02/29/12 PTV 25 kft - 2 3 3 Nominal system with flight-like wake behind PTV

CDT 3-4 04/17/12 PCDTV 25 kft - 2 3 3 High Q Drogue deploy, Main skip 2nd

CDT 3-5 07/18/12 PTV 25 kft - 2 3 3 Main skip 1st

CDT 3-6 08/28/12 PCDTV 25 kft - 2 3 3 Max Q Drogue deploy

CDT 3-7 12/20/12 PTV 25 kft - 1 3 3 Drogue fail

CDT 3-8 02/12/13 PCDTV 25 kft 3 2 3 3 High Q Drogue Deploy, Drogue skip 1st, flagging Main

CDT 3-9 05/01/13 PTV 25 kft - 1 3 3 Drogue fail, Main skip 1st

CDT 3-11 07/24/13 PTV 35 kft - 2 3 3 Main skip 1st & released

CDT 3-10 01/16/14 PTV 25 kft 3 2 3 3 FBC & nominal system

CDT 3-12 02/26/14 PCDTV 35 kft 3 2 2 2 Max Q Drogue deploy, Pilot & Main fail

CDT 3-13 04/23/14 PTV 13 kft - - 3 3 Straight to Mains deploy

CDT 3-14 06/25/14 PTV 35 kft 3 2 3 3 FBC & Main skip 2nd

CDT 3-15 12/18/14 PTV 25 kft - 2 2 2 Textile risers, Main design changes

CDT 3-16 8/26/15 PTV 35 kft 2 1 2 2 Minimum System, textile risers, 85% PRL

CDT 3-17 1/13/16 PCDTV 30 kft 2 2 3 3 High Q Drogue and Main deploy

Parachute Qualification Drop Testingts

Number Date Vehicle Alt. Parachute # in Cluster Primary Test Objective(s)
FBC Drogue Pilot Main
CQT 4-1 9/30/16 PCDTV 35 kft 2 2 3 3 Two FBCP, nominal system, bounding high Q Drogue
and Main deploys
CQT 4-2 3/8/17 PTV 25 kft - 2 3 3 No FBCPs, min Q Drogue deploy

CQT 4-3 6/14/17 PTV 25 kft - - 3 3 Straight to Mains, low Q deploy

CQT 4-4 9/13/17 PTV 25 kft - - 3 3 Straight to Mains, high Q deploy

CQT 4-5 12/15/17 PTV 35 kft 2 2 2 2 Two FBCPs, two Mains

CQT 4-6 3/16/18 PTV 35 kft 2 2 3 3 Nominal system with FBC

CQT 4-7 7/12/18 PCDTV 35 kft 2 2 2 2 Two Pilots/Mains, high Q Drogue and Main deploy

CQT 4-8 9/13/18 PTV 35 kft 3 2 3 3 Nominal system with FBC

Development and Testing > Parachute Quick Facts 111

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

  Testing at NASA’s Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia takes place to investigate the heating of the Orion spacecraft during reentry into
Earth’s atmosphere with a 6-inch Orion heat shield model in the 20-inch Mach 6 wind tunnel.

Wind Tunnel Testing

In order to successfully carry out its various missions, The Orion aerosciences testing team has completed more
Orion’s flight behavior in Earth’s atmosphere must than 120 tests as part of developing the aerodynamic,
be accurately designed and understood. Wind tunnel aerothermal and aeroacoustic databases for Orion. Tests
testing and simulations have played an important have been conducted in 25 different wind tunnels, 4
role in developing the aerodynamic, aerothermal, and ballistic ranges, 2 shock tunnels, and 3 research laboratories
aeroacoustics databases for atmospheric flight of Orion. The across the U.S. The tests have covered a Mach number
databases help to verify the performance, controllability, range of 0.05 to ~20 (38 mph to about 15,000 mph).
thermal protection system, structure, and safety of the Tests have been performed at NASA facilities in Virginia,
vehicle during all phases of atmospheric flight, including California and Ohio; Department of Defense facilities in
launch aborts, by allowing accurate flight simulations and Tennessee, Maryland and Florida; and universities such as
informing good design for the vehicle. the University of Buffalo in New York.

Defining the crew module aerodynamics, both static During testing, the conditions experienced by the LAS
and dynamic, is important in order to ensure stable and and the crew module are simulated inside the test facility.
controllable flight from entry into Earth’s atmosphere to For tests of ascent aborts, plumes from the LAS motors
parachute deployment and descent. It is also important are simulated with a simulant gas. Air, helium, and rocket
to define for the launch abort system (LAS) to ensure fuel were used during these tests in order to understand
successful launch aborts during ascent from the launch the jet interactions of the plumes on the vehicle from
pad to orbit. Defining the crew module and LAS aerodynamic, aeroacoustic, and aerothermal perspectives.
aerothermal environments is important in order to design Tests with the LAS attitude control motor, abort motor,
thermal protection systems that will protect them from jettison motor, and crew module reaction control systems
heat during atmospheric entry, ascent, and ascent aborts. have all been performed. These data are then analyzed,
Characterizing the aeroacoustics is also important to developed into databases, and aerosciences customers will
design and test the vehicle structures for the vibrations use those databases to design the flight control systems,
and loads they will experience during ascent and entry. thermal protection systems, and structural design of
the Orion vehicles.

Development and Testing > Other Facilities Testing 112

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Wind Tunnel Testing

Test Number Type Date Facility Description

50-AS Ascent Acoustics 5/17/07 Boeing Polysonic A preliminary investigation into the aeroacoustic loads generated
Wind Tunnel (PSWT) by the Pad Abort Test (PA-1) LAV configuration and the potential
reduction in those loads provided by an alternate Launch Abort System
configuration (ALAS-2 mod-1) developed by the ALAS project of
the NESC.
58-AA Ascent Acoustics 10/8/07 Arnold Engineering Test to identify LAV configuration to adopt for flight. Downselect
and Development between ALAS-11 rev 3, rev 8, and rev 10. Approximately12 flush
Center (AEDC) 4T mounted microphones
57-AS Ascent Acoustics 11/1/07 NASA Glenn Research LAV Ascent Aeroacoustics comparing PA-1 and ALAS-11 rev. 3
Center (GRC) 8x6 configurations with approximately 100 surface mounted microphones
11-CD Dynamic Stability 4/8/06 US Army Aberdeen Proof of concept test to evaluate the Aberdeen Research Laboratory
Test Range telemetry technique for ballistic range test data acquisition and
analysis of CM flight.
8-CD Dynamic Stability 5/10/06 NASA Langley Small-amplitude forced oscillation test of CM w/ some
Research Center unsteady pressures.
(LaRC) Transonic
Dynamics Tunnel
(TDT)
12-CD Dynamic Stability 6/19/06 US Army Aberdeen Evaluation of improved sabot designs for CM testing at the
Test Range Aberdeen Test Range
13-CD Dynamic Stability 7/6/06 US Air Force Eglin Transonic and supersonic dynamic aero data for zero L/D CM model
Ballistic Range
15-CD Dynamic Stability 9/2/06 US Army Aberdeen Lifting and non-lifting CM models for dynamic aero
Test Range database development
14-CD Dynamic Stability 10/5/06 NASA Ames Research Transonic and supersonic dynamic aero data of CM at non-zero L/D
Center Hypersonic
(ARC) Free-Flight
Aerodynamics Facility
18-CD Dynamic Stability 1/1/07 LaRC TDT Demonstration of Oscillating Turn Table test technique in the TDT
to obtain dynamic stability of the CM at high Reynolds numbers.
Comparisons with ballistic range data and previous small amplitude
forced oscillation test (8-CD)
48-CD Dynamic Stability 3/1/07 LaRC Vertical Spin Free-flight test of CM at low Mach number to provide dynamic stability
Tunnel (VST) estimates for the Pad Abort flight test.
52-CD Dynamic Stability 3/1/07 ARC Fluid Mechanics Test technique development to examine issues related to Free-to-
Laboratory Test Cell 2 Oscillate testing. Will duplicate the conditions of 48-CD test of the CM.
(TC-2)
45-AD Dynamic Stability 3/9/07 LaRC VST Low-Mach number test of LAV in support of PA-1 Flight Test

29-CD Dynamic Stability 6/1/07 ARC Gun Development Phase 2 of CM dynamic stability at large angles of attack.
Facility
82-AD Dynamic Stability 12/21/07 LaRC VST Forced Oscillation test of LAV in the Vertical Spin Tunnel

Development and Testing > Other Facilities Testing 113

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Test Number Type Date Facility Description

27-AD Dynamic Stability 3/21/08 LaRC TDT Forced oscillation (subsonic and transonic) test of LAV and CM through
as much of the 0-180 deg. range as possible
108-CD Dynamic Stability 8/25/09 Bihrle Research VST Low-speed dynamic stability test to support Orion decisions on back
shell angle changes.
109-CD Dynamic Stability 11/15/09 09 LaRC VST Dynamic stability of CM under parachutes.

117-CD Dynamic Stability 4/1/10 LaRC VST Phase 2 of dynamic stability test of CM under parachute

46-AD Dynamic Stability 6/1/10 US Air Force Eglin Ballistic range test of LAV.
Ballistic Range
55-AS Plume Acoustics 9/28/07 Florida State Jet Series of hot- versus cold-jet acoustic experiments to possibility
Noise Laboratory develop scaling laws to allow the use of cold plume tests for the LAV
with AM firing. Phase 1 - 2" 2,000°F jet versus 2" cold jet. Phase
2 - Same 2 jets with more measurement locations. Phase 3 - ~1"
D nozzle exit hybrid rocket. Phase 4 - Sounding rocket motor plume
noise measurements at NASA Wallops Flight Facility.
51-AS Plume Acoustics 10/30/0 ARC Unitary Plan 6%-scale LAV model test to determine the aeroacoustic loading
Wind Tunnel (UPWT) generated by cold air simulation of the AM plumes.
~200 flush microphones.
80-AS Plume Acoustics 9/20/10 ARC UPWT Hot Helium simulation of AM plumes for acoustic loads.
~200 flush microphones.
53-AA Plume Jet 5/21/07 Texas A&M 7x10 Foot First test of subsonic interactions between the ACM plumes and the
Interaction (JI) Wind Tunnel LAV. Primarily to validate CFD and to provide some data on coast-
phase ACM increments for the PA-1 flight test aero database.
16-AA Plume JI 6/22/07 ARC UPWT Abort loads on the CM due to AM plume JI and proximity
to Service Module
59-AA Plume JI 9/14/07 ARC UPWT High fidelity ACM JI for both Pad Abort-1 flight test article and
production ALAS-11rev3B configuration.
60-AA Plume JI 1/30/08 ARC UPWT Preliminary separation aerodynamics during abort initiation on PA-1
and ALAS-11 rev3B configurations. Preliminary aeroacoustics for
nominal ascent (with SM) and abort (LAV only) with
cold air plume simulation.
85-AA Plume JI 8/20/08 GRC Aero-Acoustic CFD validation test documenting flowfield associated with single AM
Propulsion Laboratory nozzle at M < 0.3 using PIV. Nozzle at 0°, 25°, and 40° relative to free
stream. With and without simplified LAV model.
61-AA Plume JI 12/1/08 LaRC 14- by 22 Foot Subsonic 6%-scale Jettison Motor Jet Interaction test around
Wind Tunnel alpha = 180°.
24-AA Plume JI 6/25/09 AEDC 16T Transonic/supersonic test of Jettison Motor Jet Interation for LAS
jettison during a launch abort (i.e. heat shield forward).
75-AA Plume JI 7/24/09 ARC UPWT Subsonic, transonic, and low-supersonic ACM Jet Interaction test.

76-AA Plume JI 11/24/0 LaRC UPWT Supersonic ACM Jet Interaction test (M 1.6 to 4.6).

25-AA Plume JI 2/26/10 ARC UPWT Supersonic (M 1.6 to 2.5) Jettison Motor Jet Interaction and Jettison
LAS/CM Proximity aerodynamics.
26-AA Plume JI 8/9/10 ARC UPWT Subsonic, transonic, and supersonic AM and ACM Jet Interactions
including separation effects data for the LAV. PSP to document
pressure loadings during launch aborts.

Development and Testing > Other Facilities Testing 114

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Test Number Type Date Facility Description

3-CA CM Static Aero 2/10/06 LaRC UPWT Study of BL trip techniques on 3%-scale CM model.

7-CA CM Static Aero 3/10/06 LaRC UPWT Force and moment measurements & pressure distributions, with apex
cover on/off and boundary layer transition/tripping study.
5-CA CM Static Aero 3/22/06 ARC UPWT Force & moments and pressure data on 7.5%- and 3%-scale models.
Provided tunnel-to-tunnel comparisons between LaRC and ARC UPWT.
9-CA CM Static Aero 4/20/06 LaRC Mach 6 Tunnel 3%-scale CM test for alpha from 0 to 180°.

1-CA CM Static Aero 12/8/06 LaRC UPWT Boundary layer transition measurements with IR thermography and
Temperature Sensitive Paint.
19-AA LAV Static Aero 1/29/07 Boeing PSWT 3%-scale transonic test of PA-1 LAV configuration for
0-180° angle of attack.
54-AA LAV Static Aero 4/13/07 Lockheed High-Speed Quantify the roll coupling with angle of attack caused by the clocking
Wind Tunnel of the abort motor nozzles on the PA-1 configuration. Study effective-
ness of various nozzle fairings in relieving the roll interaction
88-AA LAV Static Aero 10/20/0 LaRC VST Test of the PA-1 Launch Abort Tower alone to define the
postjettison aerodynamics.
83-AA LAV Static Aero 6/1/08 LaRC National High-Re effects on unpowered LAV aerodynamics.
Transonic Facility
122-PA Static Aero 11/8/10 ARC TC-2 Small-scale test of Forward Bay Cover aerodynamics to validate CFD
and engineering models of the FBC jettison event.

Development and Testing > Other Facilities Testing 115

ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Final Operations and

Assembly at Kennedy
Operations and
Checkout Building
The Neil Armstrong Operations & Checkout (O&C) It includes unique tooling stations, test fixtures, chambers
Building has played a major role in NASA’s spaceflight and clean rooms for the buildup and testing of the
history. It was the first building finished at NASA’s spacecraft and two 27.5-ton cranes used to move payloads.
Kennedy Space Center and has housed the Astronaut
Crew Quarters since the mid-1960s where the Gemini Orion assembly in the O&C Building consists of joining
astronauts stayed prior to launch. the crew module, crew module adapter, and the service
module which will carry the consumables astronauts
When the Orion spacecraft arrives to Kennedy following will need for missions into deep space. Various testing
initial manufacturing at NASA’s Michoud Assembly on the crew and service modules also takes place in this
Facility in New Orleans, it is placed in the O&C Building. facility, including a final round of testing and assembly
The O&C contains a large room called a high bay that is in the Final Assembly and System Testing (FAST) cell.
operated by Lockheed Martin as a high-tech factory; it is After final checkout in the O&C, the spacecraft is then
where the spacecraft is assembled and readied for missions transported to the Multi-Payload Processing Facility
to deep space destinations. The high bay underwent an (MPPF) and handed over to Exploration Ground Systems
extensive, two-year renovation starting in 2007 to outfit for ground processing.
the facility for assembly of Orion.

  A variety of space hardware for the Orion crew module is in view in the Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building high bay at NASA’s Kennedy
Space Center in Florida.

Development and Testing > Final Operations and Assembly at Kennedy 116
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

The 19,647-square-foot Multi-Payload Processing Facility at Kennedy Space Center in Florida is where Orion will receive its flight load of propellant,
high pressure gasses, and coolant.

Multi-Payload Processing Facility Both pieces of hardware underwent fueling and commodity
servicing in the facility ahead of launch. The ICPS will
A unique facility at Kennedy, the Multi-Payload Processing be positioned above the core stage and will provide the
Facility (MPPF) is used for commodity servicing and power needed to give Orion the big push it needs to break
fueling the Orion spacecraft with its flight load of hazardous out of Earth orbit on a precise trajectory toward the Moon
propellants, high pressure gases, coolant, and other fluids during Artemis I.
the spacecraft and astronauts will need to maneuver and
carry out their missions in space. When Orion returns The fueling of hazardous commodities is performed
to Earth after its mission, it will be transported back to remotely from a firing room in the Launch Control
the MPPF, where specialized equipment will be used Center. Various electrical ground support equipment
to remove unused hazardous propellants from its tanks racks allow technicians to power up the spacecraft and
during spacecraft postflight processing. perform service operations remotely. The spacecraft’s
temperature and humidity is tightly controlled using
On Jan. 16, 2021, the Artemis I vehicle was transferred mini-portable purge units, which provide a constant flow
from the Operations & Checkout (O&C) Building of conditioned air.
to the MPPF, where it was moved onto a service stand
that provides 360-degree access, allowing engineers The 19,647-square-foot MPPF building, originally
and technicians from Exploration Ground Systems, its constructed in 1995, has undergone extensive upgrades
prime contractor Jacobs Technology, and other support and modernizations to support Orion, which began in
organizations to fuel and service the spacecraft. Crane 2013. The facility also will be used to install time-critical
operators removed the transportation cover and used crew equipment and to process crew modules that have
fuel lines and several fluid ground support equipment returned from space prior to being returned to the O&C
panels to load the various commodities into the for possible reuse. Ground support equipment also will be
crew and service modules. stored and maintained in the MPPF.

The Space Launch System rocket’s interim cryogenic After Orion is fueled and final checks are performed in
propulsion stage (ICPS) moved into the Multi-Payload the MPPF, its transportation cover is re-installed and the
Processing Facility Feb. 18, 2021, alongside one of its flight spacecraft is moved to the Launch Abort System Facility
partners for the Artemis I mission, the Orion spacecraft. (LASF) for integration with the launch abort system.

Development and Testing > Final Operations and Assembly at Kennedy 117
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Launch Abort System Facility

After fueling and commodity servicing in the MPPF, the
Orion spacecraft is moved to the Launch Abort System
Facility (LASF). The 44-foot-tall launch abort system
(LAS) is first prepared horizontally inside the LASF and is
afterwards assembled vertically with the Orion spacecraft.
The LASF, previously used to lift and rotate the canister
that carried space shuttle payloads to the launch pad, is
taller than many processing facilities at Kennedy to allow
clearance for vertical assembly and has cranes and other
equipment needed to integrate the system during launch
processing. Installation of the ogive panels that protect the
crew module and LAS and provide its aerodynamic shape
also take place at the LASF. After the LAS is integrated
with Orion, the entire stack is moved to High Bay 3 in
the Vehicle Assembly Building. The Artemis I spacecraft
moved into the LASF for integration on July 21, 2021.

  Inside the Launch Abort System Facility (LASF) at NASA’s Kennedy

Space Center in Florida, the fully assembled Orion spacecraft for the
agency’s Artemis I mission is prepared for transport on Oct. 18, 2021.

Development and Testing > Final Operations and Assembly at Kennedy 118
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Vehicle Assembly Building

The Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) serves as the central The massive SLS rocket and its twin solid rocket boosters
hub of NASA’s premier multi-user spaceport, capable of require a large high bay from which to process and prepare
hosting several different kinds of rockets and spacecraft them for launch. Exploration Ground Systems recently
at the same time. Whether the rockets and spacecraft completed many upgrades and modifications to High
are going into Earth orbit or being sent into deep Bay 3 in the VAB where the SLS and Orion are stacked,
space, the VAB has the infrastructure to prepare them processed and tested atop the new mobile launcher. Ten
for their missions. levels of new work platforms were installed in High Bay 3,
Towers E and F, to accommodate the rocket. A total of 20
The tallest portion of the VAB is called the high bay. There platform halves altogether surround the SLS and Orion
are four high bays, two on the east side, and two on the spacecraft and provide access for testing and processing
west side of the building. Each has a 456-foot-high door, before they are transported to the launch pad.
enabling rockets to be stacked vertically and then rolled
out to the launch pad.

  Seen to the right of the iconic Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, a crane positions the Orion crew access arm
(CAA) so it can be attached to the mobile launcher (ML).

Development and Testing > Final Operations and Assembly at Kennedy 119
ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Each of the giant steel platforms measures about 38

feet long and close to 62 feet wide. Each weigh between
300,000 and 325,000 pounds. The platforms are attached
to rail beams which provide structural support and
contain the drive mechanisms to retract and extend them.
Each platform rides on four Hillman roller systems that
are located two on each side – much like a kitchen drawer
glides in and out. A mechanical articulated tray also moves
in and out with each platform.

In the VAB, the Orion spacecraft is lifted and secured

atop the SLS rocket on the mobile launcher. The
completed SLS/Orion stack is then transported atop
the mobile launcher on Crawler-Transporter 2 to
Launch Pad 39B for launch.

The Artemis I Orion spacecraft was moved from the

Launch Abort System Facility (LASF) to the VAB on
Oct. 19, 2021. The Orion spacecraft and SLS rocket were
hard mated on Oct. 21, 2021, marking completion of the
Artemis I stack.

  Inside the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center

in Florida, a crane lowers the Space Launch System (SLS) core stage
pathfinder into High Bay 3 on Oct. 16, 2019.

Development and Testing > Final Operations and Assembly at Kennedy 120
 ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

Resources

Acronyms
AA-2 Ascent Abort-2 CMA Crew Module Adapter ECLSS Environmental Control and
ABCU Auxiliary Bus Control Unit CMO Chief Medical Officer Life Support System
ACM Attitude Control Motor CMRT Crew Module Recovery Trainer ECN Engineering Change Notice
ADP Advanced Development Projects CMUS Crew Module Uprighting System EDL Exploration Development Lab
AFRC Armstrong Flight COFR Certification of Flight Readiness EDU Engineering Development Unit
Research Center CPIT Cross Program Integration Team EEE Electrical, Electronic and
AI&P Assembly, Integration CSM Crew & Service Module Electromechanical
and Production CSO Chief Safety Officer EERB ESD Engineering Review Board
AI&T Analysis, Integration & Test CT Crawler Transporter EFT-1 Exploration Flight Test 1
AM Abort Motor CTIL Communication & Tracking EGF Flight Support Equipment
AOS Acquisition of Signal Integrated Lab Grapple Fixture
APS Avionics Power and Software D&C Display & Controls EGS Exploration Ground Systems
ARC Ames Research Center DCR Design Certification Review EGSE Electrical Ground
ATB Abort Test Booster DD250 Department of Defense Support Equipment
ATCS Active Thermal Control System form 250 EIO European Service Module
ATD Anthropomorphic Test Devices DDT&E Design, Development, Integration Office
ATLO Assembly Test & Test & Evaluation EMC Electromagnetic Compatibility
Launch Operations DFI Developmental Flight EMI Electromagnetic Interference
ATP Authority To Proceed Instrumentation ERB Engineering Review Board
ATV Automated Transfer Vehicle DM Data Management ESA European Space Agency
BEO Beyond Earth Orbit DMJS Docking Mechanism ESD Exploration Systems
BTA Boilerplate Test Article Jettison System Development
C&DH Command & Data Handling DOD Department of Defense ESD CE Exploration Systems
C&T Communications & Tracking DU Display Unit Development Chief Engineer
CAM Control Account Manager ECB Exploration Systems ESD RMO Exploration Systems
CCB Configuration Control Board Development Control Board Development Resources
CDR Critical Design Review ECD Estimated Completion Date Management Office
CE Chief Engineer ECLS Environmental Control and ESM European Service Module
CM Crew Module Life Support E-STA European Structural Test Article

Resources 121
 ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

EUS Exploration Upper Stage ICPS Interim Cryogenic Upper Stage MECO Main Engine Cut Off
EVA Extra-vehicular Activity ICWG Interface Control MET Mission Elapsed Time
FAST Final Assembly and Test Working Group MEV&V Multi-Element Verification
FBC Forward Bay Cover IG Inspector General & Validation
FBCP Forward Bay Cover Parachutes IML Inner Mold Line MGSE Mechanical Ground
FCR Flight Control Room IOZ Industrial Operating Zone Support Equipment
FDR Flight Data Recorder IPIT Integrated Programmatic and MIR Mission Integration Review
FIT Focused Integration Team Program Control ML Mobile Launcher
FMEA/CIL Failure Modes Effects Analysis/ Integration Team MLI Multi-layer insulation
Critical Items List IPO Initial Power On MMH Monomethylhydrazine
FOD Flight Operations Directorate IPT Integrated Product Team (hypergolic propellent)
FOP Flight Operations Teams IRF Integrated Robotics Facility MMOD Micro Meteor Orbital Debris
FPCB ESD Flight Procedures ISS International Space Station MMT Mission Management Team
Control Board ITAR International Traffic in MOD Mission Operations Directorate
FRCB ESD Flight Rules Control Board Arms Regulation MODE Multi-Organizational
FRR Flight Readiness Review ITL Integrated Test Laboratory Development Engineering
FSW Flight Software IWG Integrated Working Group MON Mixed Oxides of Nitrogen
FTV Flight Test Vehicle JICB Joint Integration Control Board MPCB MPCV Program Control Board
FY Fiscal Year JM Jettison Motor MPCV Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle
GC Ground Controller JPCB Joint Program Control Board MPPF Multi-Payload
GEMCB Government Equipment & JSC Johnson Space Center Processing Facility
Materials Control Board KDR Key Driving Requirement MSERP MPCV Safety Engineering
GFE Government Furnished KSC Kennedy Space Center Review Panel
Equipment LaRC Langley Research Center MSFC Marshall Space Flight Center
GMIP Government Mandatory LAS Launch Abort System MSO Mass Simulator for Orion
Inspection Point LASF Launch Abort System Facility M-STA Mechanical Structural
GMT Greenwich Mean Time LCCP Cross Program Launch Test Article
GNC Guidance, Navigation & Control Commit Criteria Panel MVF Mechanical Vibration Facility
GOOV Gas On/Off Valve LEAF Lunar Environment Arcjet Facility MVS Mechanical Vibration System
GPS Global Positioning System LEO Low-Earth Orbit NBL Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory
GRC Glenn Research Center LETF Launch Equipment Test Facility NPD NASA Policy Directive
GSE Ground Support Equipment LIDAR Light Detection and Ranging NPR NASA Program Requirement
GTA Ground Test Article LIDS Low Impact Docking System O&C Operations and Checkout
HEO Human Exploration and LM Lockheed Martin OCHMO Office of the Chief Health and
Operations Mission Directorate LOC Loss of Crew Medical Officer
HH&P Human Health & Performance LOI Lunar Orbit Insertion OCOMM Office of Communications
HITL Human in the Loop LOM Loss of Mission ODN Onboard Data Network
HLS Human Landing System LOS Loss of Signal OERB Operations Engineering
HMTA Health & Medical LOX Liquid Oxygen Review Board
Technical Authority LRD Launch Readiness Date OFT Orion Flight Test
HOTH Houston Orion Test Hardware LRS Landing & Recovery System OIMU Orion Inertial Measurement Unit
HS Heat Shield M&P Materials and Processes OMB Office of Management & Budget
HW Hardware MAF Michoud Assembly Facility OML Outer Mold Line
IBR Integrated Baseline Review MCC Mission Control Center

Resources 122
 ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

OMS-E Orbital Maneuvering QPSR Quarterly Program SNIC Standard Network

System Engine Status Review Interface Card
OMSRP Operations & Maintenance R&R Release & Retention SPLASH Structural Passive Landing
Requirements & R2D2 Rapid Reconfigurable Attenuation for Survivability of
Specifications Panel Data Distribution Human Crew (Project)
OPOC Orion Production and RATF Reverberant Acoustic SPT Subsystem Product Teams
Operations Contract Test Facility SRA Schedule Risk Analysis
OPSR Orion Program Schedule Review RCS Reaction Control System SRR System Requirements Review
ORR Operational Readiness Review RFP Request for Proposal SSDL Support Software
OSMA Office of Safety and ROC Reconfigurable Development Lab
Mission Assurance Operational Cockpit SSM Subsystem Manager
OSMS Orion Summary Master Schedule RPL Rapid Prototyping Laboratory STA Structural Test Article
OVIT Orion Vehicle Integration Team RPOD Rendezvous, Prox ops STORRM Sensor Test for Orion Relative
PA-1 Pad Abort-1 and Docking Navigation Risk Mitigation
PAA Phased Array Antenna RPSF Rotation, Processing SVMF Space Vehicle Mock-up Facility
PBS Plum Brook Station & Surge Facility SW Software
PCA Pressure Control Assembly S&MA Safety and Mission Assurance T&V Test & Verification
PCB Program Control Board SA Spacecraft Adapter TBR To Be Resolved
PCDTV Parachute Compartment Drop SADE Solar Array Drive Electronics TCU Thermal Control Unit
Test Vehicle SADM Solar Array Drive Mechanism TEI Trans-Earth Injection
PCDU Power Conditioning and SAJ Spacecraft Adapter Jettison TI Terminal Initiation
Distribution Unit SAR System Acceptance Review TLI Trans-Lunar Insertion
PDE Propulsion Drive Electronics SAT System Acceptance Test TPR Top Program Risk
PDR Preliminary Design Review SAW Solar Array Wings TPS Thermal Protection System
PDU Power and Data Unit SCAN Spacecraft Communications TRL Technology Readiness Level
PLE Project Lead Engineer & Navigation TVAC Thermal Vacuum Chamber
PMRB Program Material Review Board SCAPE Self-Contained Atmospheric TVC Thrust Vector Control
PORT Post-Landing Orion Protective Ensemble VAB Vehicle Assembly Building
Recovery Tests SE&I Systems Engineering VAC Verification Analysis Cycle
PPBE Planning, Programming, & Integration VICB Vehicle Integration Control Board
Budgeting, and Excecution SEC Space Environments Complex VIO Vehicle Integration Office
PQM Propulsion Qualification Module SEQR Senior Executive VMC Vehicle Management Computer
PRA Probabalistic Risk Assessment Quarterly Review VNS Vision Navigation Sensor
PRU Pressure Regulator Unit SET Space Environmental VPU Video Processing Unit
PSMS Program Master Test (Facility) VTB Verification Test Bed
Summary Schedule SET Space Environment Test Facility VVM Visiting Vehicle Manager
PTC Passive Thermal Control SICB SLS Integration WG Working Group
PTV Parachute Test Vehicle Control Board WIT Water Impact Testing
PV Pressure Vessel SIM Simulation WOOV Water On/Off Valve
QPM Quarterly Progress SLF Spacecraft Leadership Forum WSTF White Sands Test Facility
Meeting (Airbus) SLS Space Launch System
QPPR Quarterly Program SM Service Module
Performance Review SM&A Safety Mission & Assurance
SMCB Service Module Control Board

Resources 123
 ORION REFERENCE GUIDE 

For more information about the Orion program, visit

https://www.nasa.gov/orion

https://www.facebook.com/NASAOrion

https://www.twitter.com/NASA_Orion

https://www.instagram.com/NASAArtemis

https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasaorion/

Resources 124
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASA Johnson Space Center

2101 E NASA Pkwy
Houston, TX 77058

www.nasa.gov