Cambridge IGCSE™: First Language English 0500/11 May/June 2022
Cambridge IGCSE™: First Language English 0500/11 May/June 2022
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2022 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some
Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
marks are not deducted for errors
marks are not deducted for omissions
answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however, the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Note: All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and derived from the texts.
Question 1
This question tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R5 (25 marks):
and Question 1(f) only tests writing assessment objectives W2, W3 and W5 (5 marks):
1(a) Give the two examples of types of endurance events, other than ultra- 1
marathons, according to the text.
1(b)(i) Using your own words, explain what the text means by: 2
‘challenge the limits’ (line 3):
1(b)(ii) Using your own words, explain what the text means by: 2
‘mythical beast’ (line 4):
short(er)
involves getting hurt / more dangerous / fire / electric shock
Give two reasons why the writer decided to drop their ‘habitual laziness’ and
take up
running.
Explain why extreme sports are growing in popularity according to the text.
Using your own words, explain why some Ironman competitors might still like
to compete in marathons.
Answers which are entirely in the words of the text should not be credited.
1(f) According to Text B, why did Jayden Dee want to take part in this particular 15
event?
You must use continuous writing (not note form) and use your own words as
far as possible.
Up to 10 marks are available for the content of your answer and up to 5 marks
for the quality of your writing.
Use the Marking Criteria for Question 1(f) (Table A, Reading and Table B Writing).
Table A, Reading
0 0 No creditable content.
Table B, Writing
3 4–5 A relevant response that is expressed clearly, fluently and mostly with
concision.
The response is well organised.
The response is in the candidate’s own words (where appropriate), using a
range of well-chosen vocabulary which clarifies meaning.
Spelling, punctuation and grammar are mostly accurate.
2 3–2 A relevant response that is generally expressed clearly, with some evidence
of concision.
There may be some lapses in organisation.
The response is mainly expressed in the candidate’s own words (where
appropriate) but there may be reliance on the words of the text.
Errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar which do not impede
communication.
0 0 No creditable content.
Note 1: All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and derived from the texts.
Question 2
This question tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R4 (25 marks):
2(a)(i) R1 1
2(a)(ii) R2 1
2(a)(iii) R1 1
2(a)(iv) R1 1
2(b)(i) R2 1
2(b)(ii) R2 1
2(b)(iii) R1 1
2(c) R2 and R4 3
Total 25
2(a)(i) Identify a word or phrase from the text which suggests the same idea as the 1
words underlined:
The writer was slightly unsure that it was a good idea to publish their blog entry.
2(a)(ii) Identify a word or phrase from the text which suggests the same idea as the 1
words underlined:
Her husband’s training had little effect on the daily life of the family to begin
with.
(Initially it) didn’t really impact (our lives too much) (line 8)
2(a)(iii) Identify a word or phrase from the text which suggests the same idea as the 1
words underlined:
Fitting in bike rides to the family’s weekend schedule was perfectly manageable.
2(a)(iv) Identify a word or phrase from the text which suggests the same idea as the 1
words underlined:
The writer accepted grumpily that they hadn’t changed their mind about Sam
competing in the Ironman.
2(b)(i) Using your own words, explain what the writer means by each of the words 1
underlined:
June was all about Ironman. Endless weekends with Sam gone until 5pm each
day. After exercise he would need to sleep for an hour or so, thus he was
technically gone for longer. I was desperate for us to go away and have a break
from it.
2(b)(ii) Using your own words, explain what the writer means by each of the words 1
underlined:
2(b)(iii) Using your own words, explain what the writer means by each of the words 1
underlined:
desperate: longing (for) / badly wanted / strongly desired / unable to cope without
having / needed
2(c) Use one example from the text below to explain how the writer suggests their 3
feelings about Sam’s approach to training for the Ironman event.
There was so much laundry (‘different road conditions’) so much extra food
(‘fuel’) and so much gear (multiple pairs of goggles with different tints ‘because
you never know…’)! Smiling understandingly, Sam assured me the next one will
be cheaper. Next one?
Explain how the writer uses language to convey meaning and to create effect in
these paragraphs. Choose three examples of words or phrases from each
paragraph to support your answer. Your choices should include the use of
imagery.
Notes on task
This question is marked for the ability to select powerful or unusual words and for an
understanding of ways in which the language is effective. Expect responses to provide
words / phrases that carry connotations additional to general meaning.
Mark holistically for the overall quality of the response, not for the number of words
chosen, bearing in mind that for the higher bands there should be a range of choices
to demonstrate an understanding of how language works, and that this should include
the ability to explain images. It is the quality of the analysis that attracts marks. Do not
deduct marks for inaccurate statements; simply ignore them.
The following notes are a guide to what good responses might say about the
selections.
Candidates can make any sensible comment, but only credit those that are relevant to
the correct meanings of the words in the context and that have some validity.
Alternative acceptable explanations should be credited. Credit comments on effects
created by non-vocabulary choices such as grammar / syntax and punctuation
devices. These must be additional to comments on vocabulary.
Paragraph 10 begins ‘Because it’s there …’ and is about the writer’s reactions to
other people’s views.
2(d) Paragraph 12 begins ‘Having said all that …’ and is about the writer’s feelings at 15
the end of the race.
emerge god-like from the water: dramatic and powerful exit from the water, suggests
strength and conquering hero; achieved more than a mere ‘mortal’, transformed, in
awe of him
power past us: forceful, full of strength and energy even at the end of the race
rocket (down the finishing chute) : incredible speed, as if fuelled / propelled
head held high: looking up towards finish, pleasure in his own achievement, boosted
self-esteem
utterly incredible: amazing, unbelievable
intoxicating: dizzying, takes over senses, addicted
rare pinnacles of perfection: few instances, particularly special and memorable
moment of achievement, reminiscent of arriving at the highest point of a mountain,
unlikely to be replicated
epic journey: the shared experience of training and the race had been really hard and
long for the whole family, heroic adventure, amazing tale coming to its successful
conclusion
And next year? Well yes, it’s my turn … : time for the focus to be on her, would do
the whole thing again, acknowledges a shift in perspective, more balanced
conclusions and a sense of more of their story to come / defiant / determined
Only credit comments on stylistic effect where these are explicitly linked to choices.
5 13–15 Wide-ranging discussion of judiciously selected language with some high quality
comments that add meaning and associations to words/phrases in both parts of
the text, and demonstrate the writer’s reasons for using them.
Tackles imagery with some precision and imagination.
There is clear evidence that the candidate understands how language works.
2 4–6 The response provides a mixture of appropriate choices and words that
communicate less well.
The response may correctly identify linguistic devices but not explain why they are
used.
Explanations may be few, general, slight or only partially effective.
They may repeat the language of the original or do not refer to specific words.
Note: All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and derived from the texts.
Question 3
This question tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R3 (15 marks):
and writing assessment objectives W1, W2, W3, W4 and W5 (10 marks):
3 You are Sam. After completing the race you are interviewed for a podcast about 25
your experience and the advice you would offer to anyone thinking of entering an
Ironman.
How exactly do you need to prepare for a challenge like Ironman and why is
each aspect of that preparation important?
How do you think preparing for Ironman affected other areas of your life and
what advice would you offer anyone considering entering an Ironman for the
first time?
What were the rewards of completing an Ironman for you and your family?
Base your interview on what you have read in Text C, but be careful to use your
own words. Address each of the three bullets.
Up to 15 marks are available for the content of your answer and up to 10 marks for
the quality of your writing.
Use the Marking Criteria for Question 3 (Table A, Reading and Table B Writing)
Notes on task
Candidates should select ideas from the text (see below) and develop them relevantly,
supporting what they write with details from the text. Look for an appropriate register for
the genre, and a clear and balanced response which covers the three areas of the
question, is well sequenced, and is in the candidate’s own words.
Annotate A1 for references to how exactly you need to prepare for a challenge like
Ironman and why each aspect of that preparation.
Annotate A2 for references to how Sam thinks preparing for Ironman affected other
areas of his life and what advice he would offer anyone considering entering an Ironman
for the first time.
Annotate A3 for references to the rewards of completing an Ironman for Sam and his
family.
3 A1: How exactly do you need to prepare for a challenge like Ironman and why is
each aspect of that preparation important?
dedicating time to training (det. started January, six months before event) [dev.
there is a lot to do, need time to make progress]
get a coach (det. expert) [dev. help avoid costly mistakes of an amateur]
plan targets (det. monthly training plans) [dev. build up strength and fitness / reason
it gets progressively harder / help to remain focused]
bike rides (det. 1-3 hour rides initially) [dev. significant part of the race / don’t want
to fail at one or more of the disciplines]
swims (det. visits to local pool / own pool) [dev. need to ensure you are practising
the other disciplines not just the easiest / could be difficult if no water resource easily
accessible locally]
kit (det. special goggles) [dev. keep you safe / want to look good ]
focus on health (det. food as fuel, sleep for an hour) [dev. recovering / for energy]
A2: How do you think preparing for Ironman affected other areas of your life and
what advice would you offer anyone considering entering an Ironman for the first
time?
holidays / excursions (det. no camping for the kids; no family hiking) [dev. sacrifice
you have to make]
relationship with wife (det. fed up, initially bonding experience) [dev. try to build in
training together for as long as you can / annoying having to justify / unfair on her]
problems at work / negative reactions of others (det. less than supportive
business partner, others questioning decision) [dev. difficult to balance everything /
talk through (potential) issues]
restricted social life / limited leisure time (det. no time at weekends, not being
able to say yes to invitations) [dev. don’t be put off]
family / relationship with children / responsibilities as a parent (det. childcare,
tears from son after he had gone) [dev. plan for extra help in advance / wasn’t aware
of the effect on them]
finance (det. cost of all the extras) [dev. be realistic / consider whether you really
need as much / budget in advance]
A3: What were the rewards of completing an Ironman for you and your family?
excitement of the finish (det. crowd) [dev. lifted by the sense of occasion, special
memory to cherish]
own sense of achievement (det. head held high) [dev. feeling mentally stronger /
more powerful mentally / belief in self / all worth it ]
proud reaction of family (det. children cheering him on) [dev. team effort / bonding
as a family]
inspiration for others (det. wife planning to enter next year) [dev. role model for
children]
publicity (for the travel company / personal) (det. interview / podcast / articles)
[dev. may offer new/increased opportunities, proving doubters wrong / buoyed by the
articles]
5 13–15 The response reveals a thorough evaluation and analysis of the text.
Developed ideas are sustained and well related to the text.
A wide range of ideas is applied.
There is supporting detail throughout, which is well integrated into the
response, contributing to a strong sense of purpose and approach.
All three bullets are well covered.
A consistent and convincing voice is used.
4 10–12 The response demonstrates a competent reading of the text with some
evidence of basic evaluation or analysis.
A good range of ideas is evident.
Some ideas are developed but the ability to sustain them may not be
consistent.
There is frequent, helpful supporting detail, contributing to a clear sense of
purpose.
All three bullets are covered.
An appropriate voice is used.
1 1–3 The response is either very general, with little reference to the text, or a
reproduction of sections of the original.
Content is either insubstantial or unselective.
There is little realisation of the need to modify material from the text.
3 5–6 Language is clear but comparatively plain and/or factual, expressing little
opinion.
Ideas are rarely extended, but explanations are adequate.
Some sections are quite well sequenced but there may be flaws in structure.
Minor, but more frequent, errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar