Research Analysis
Research Analysis
LIBS 893:
Research Principles & Analysis
Course Material
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or
by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise
without the prior permission of the Director, Distance Learning Centre, Ahmadu
Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Course Writers/
Development Team
Editor
Prof. M.I Sule
Language Reviewer
Enegoloinu Adakole
Instructional Designers/Graphics
Ibrahim Otukoya, Abubakar Haruna
ODL Expert
Dr Hayatu Musa
QUOTE
Open and Distance Learning has the exceptional ability of meeting the challenges of the three
vectors of dilemma in education delivery – Access, Quality and Cost.
– Sir John Daniels
Contents
Copyright Page ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ii
Course Writers/Development Team... ... ... ... ... ... ... iii
Content… … … … … … … … … … … v
COURSE STUDY GUIDE... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 1
i. Course Information ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 1
ii. Course Introduction and Description ... ... ... ... ... 3
iii. Course Prerequisites ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 3
iv. Course Learning Resources ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 3
v. Course Objectives and Outcomes ... ... ... ... ... ... 5
vi. Activities to Meet Course Objectives... ... ... ... ... ... 6
vii. Time (To complete Syllabus/Course) ... ... ... ... ... ... 6
viii. Grading Criteria and Scale ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 8
ix. OER Resources ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 10
x. ABU DLC Academic Calendar ... ... ... ... ... ... 11
xi. Course Structure and Outline
xii. STUDY MODULES ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 17
1.0 Module 1: An Overview of Research... ... ... ... ... ... 17
Study Session 1: Introduction to Research ... ... ... ... ... ... 17
Study Session 2: Types of Research ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 23
Study Session 3: Ethical Issues in Research ... ... ... ... ... ... 32
Study Session 4: Qualitative Research... ... ... ... ... ... ...
2.0 Module 2: The Research Process... ... ... ... ... ... ... 43
Study Session 1: Identifying and Formulating research problem ... ... ... 43
Study Session 2: Research Paradigm, Literature Review and Theoretical Framework... 55
Study Session 3: Research objective and Variable Measurement ... ... ... 63
Study Session 4: The Research Design ... ... ... ... ... ... 72
3.0 Module 3: Data Presentation and Analysis... ... ... ... ... ... 83
Study Session 1: Sample Design and Instrument for Data Collection... ... ... 83
Study Session 2: Data Collection and Analysis ... ... ... ... ... 91
Study Session 3:The Research Hypothesis ... ... ... ... ... ... 101
Distance Learning Centre ABU, Course Material v
Libs 803: Research Methodology
Study Session 4: Writing a Research Report ... ... ... ... ... 110
Course Study
Guide
Course Information
Preamble
You are welcome to Research Methodology, LIBS 803. A class that will prepare
you to be able to conduct an independent research. I look forward to a rewarding
semester with you. This course is a three-part process from concepts to
applications, delivery and implementation. Each part consists of several central
concepts and steps in research, investigations and analysis. The following is a
description of the stages and steps for your development. This document is based
on the past practices and current directions of research into contemporary course
design and quality assurance practices. You are expected to feel free to compare
the content of this document with similar others in other academic institutions and
report any cogent variation for possible input into this document or the course for
its development process based on contemporary best academic practices.
Introduction and
Description
Course Introduction:
This course will introduce you to the basics of Research Methodology. This Course
is designed to expose them to the theory and practices of researches as applied in
management research. In this course, they will learn to approach qualitative and
quantitative researches as iterative processes revolving around research problems
and issues of interest to modern management executives as day to day decision
makers. Emphasis is given to understanding and application of basic research
concepts and principles as applied in management researches and activities.
Course Description:
This course is about exposing you to the theory and practice of qualitative and
quantitative researches. In this course, you will learn how to approach qualitative
and quantitative research as iterative processes revolving around research problems
and issues of interest to modern management executives as day to day decision
makers. The course is also designed to deepen your thinking about qualitative and
quantitative research, data, problems, interests, questions. It is also to develop
students‘ competence in both theory and application of research methodology as
commonly used in management /administration research. In this course, you will
be acquainted with varying procedures of sampling design, data collection,
hypothesis testing and analysis required for carrying out independent research
project. The course will draw your attention to important but usually neglected
ethical issues in research management.
Plagiarism: Essentially, you should ensure that all works submitted for any
academic purpose are from their personal efforts/contributions. Plagiarism is a
form of dishonest practice. Plagiarism is defined as copying or paraphrasing
someone else‘s work and presented as one's own without due necessary
acknowledgements. In practice, this means plagiarism includes any attempt to by
whosoever to submit/present someone else piece of work (e.g. an assignment or
test) as one's own work (whether of another student or a published authority).
Anyone found responsible for plagiarism in any piece of work submitted for
assessment shall be penalised in accordance with the University rules and
regulations as they affect plagiarism. The possible penalties may include forfeiture
of marks for the piece of work submitted leading to obtaining a zero grade for the
paper. In extreme cases, it could lead to expulsion from the University.
i. COURSE PREREQUISITES
Basically, the prerequisites of the course are that students should possess:
1. Satisfactory level of English proficiency
2. Basic Computer Operations proficiency
3. Online interaction proficiency
4. Web 2.0 and Social media interactive skills
Specifically, the primary aim of this course is to review, deepen, and broaden your
understanding of research methodology concepts and frameworks; and to allow
them gain experience in applying them to real management challenges as decision
makers. Besides, the overriding objective of an MIM programme is to develop
sound all round decision-makers.
Individual and group assignments will provide the basis of your assessment for
much of the work in the class. It is therefore expected that you read and study each
question or assignment and be fully prepared for the assignments to be given out as
the class progresses. Topical discussion will also form part of your assessments.
Thus, you are to be adequately ready and prepared to discuss issues raised and
presented for their intelligent interrogations, discussions, arguments and
contributions as ways of expressing themselves willingly to enrich class
sessions/discussions without bias or sentiments. Thus, your participation in such
class sessions will be judged by the extent of their contributions.
Group discussion will be run primarily as assignments too. Each topic shall be
assigned to you or a group of you to write and upload on a programme block.
Where a group is assigned, each member is expected to show evidence of personal
contribution. The assignments are contained in the course materials/resources.
Groups‘‘ responses to each assignment or question are to be submitted
accordingly. They will be recognised and rewarded accordingly.
Specifically, this course shall comprise of the following activities:
1. Studying courseware
2. Listening to course audios
3. Watching relevant course videos
4. Course assignments (individual and group)
5. Forum discussion participation
6. Tutorials (optional)
7. Semester examinations (CBT and essay based {pen on paper}).
C. Grading Scale:
A = 70-100
B = 60 – 69
C = 50 - 59
D = 45-49
F = 0-44
D. Feedback
Courseware based:
1. In-text questions and answers (answers preceding references)
2. Self-assessment questions and answers (answers preceding references)
Tutor based:
1. Discussion Forum tutor input
2. Graded Continuous assessments
Student based:
1. Online programme assessment (administration, learning resource,
deployment, and assessment).
vii. LINKS TO OPEN EDUCATION RESOURCES
OSS Watch provides tips for selecting open source, or for procuring free or
open software.
School Forge and Source Forge are good places to find, create, and publish
open software. Source Forge for one item could have about millions of
downloads each day.
Open Source Education Foundation and Open Source Initiative, and other
organisation like these, help disseminate knowledge.
Creative Commons has a number of open projects from Khan
Academy to Curriki where teachers and parents can find educational materials
for children or learn about Creative Commons licenses. Also, they recently
launched the School of Open that offers courses on the meaning, application,
and impact of "openness."
Numerous open or open educational resource databases and search engines
exist. Some examples include:
OEDb: over 10,000 free courses from universities as well as reviews of
colleges and rankings of college degree programmes
Open Tapestry: over 100,000 open licensed online learning resources for an
academic and general audience
OER Commons: over 40,000 open educational resources from elementary
school through to higher education; many of the elementary, middle, and
high school resources are aligned to the Common Core State Standards
Open Content: a blog, definition, and game of open source as well as a
friendly search engine for open educational resources from MIT, Stanford,
and other universities with subject and description listings
Academic Earth: over 1,500 video lectures from MIT, Stanford, Berkeley,
Harvard, Princeton, and Yale
JISC: Joint Information Systems Committee works on behalf of UK higher
education and is involved in many open resources and open projects
including digitising British newspapers from 1620-1900!
Global
Unesco's searchable open database is a portal to worldwide courses and
research initiatives
African Virtual University (http://oer.avu.org/) has numerous modules on
subjects in English, French, and Portuguese
https://code.google.com/p/course-builder/ is Google's open source software
that is designed to let anyone create online education courses
Global Voices (http://globalvoicesonline.org/) is an international community
of bloggers who report on blogs and citizen media from around the world,
including on open source and open educational resources
https://bit.ly/2EnpnH9)
Course Outline
Module 1: An Overview of Research
Study Session 1: Introduction to Research
Study Session 2: Types of Research
Study Session 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Research
Study Session 4: Ethical Issues in Research
Study Modules
Study Session 1
Introduction to Research
Section and Subsection Headings
Introduction
1.0 Learning Outcomes
2.0 Main Content:
2.1 - Definition of Research
2.2 - Objectives of Research
2.3 - Importance of Research
3.0 Study Session Summary and Conclusion
4.0 Self-Assessment Questions
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out- of- Class activities)
6.0 References/Further Readings
Introduction
This is first study module in this session. You are to learn more about the various
definitions of research, the objectives of research as well as the importance of
conducting research. Please, do stay tune as we will start with the learning outcome
of this study.
ITA: Research is a systematic process of finding the cause of a problem and data
collection, analysis interpretation and discussion of the implication of the findings to
proffer solutions to the problem
ITA: To gain familiarity with a phenomenon or to achieve new insights into it. A
phenomenon could be any social issue/problem.
ITA: Research adds to knowledge, improves practice and ensure informed policy formulation
process.
problem. In this session, students have learnt the various definition of research, the
objectives of research and the importance of research, the processes of research
were also discussed.
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out of Class activities) e.g.
a. Visit U-tube add https://goo.gl/E7iYAb , https://goo.gl/Bbr96J. Watch the
video & summarise in 1 paragraph
b. View the animation on add/site https://bit.ly/2JVPSXG and critique it in the
discussion forum
Study Session 2
Types of Research
Section and Subsection Headings
Introduction
1.0 Learning Outcomes
2.0 Main Content:
2.1- General Classification of Research
2.2 - Classification based on Objectives of the Research
2.2.1- Descriptive research:
2.2.2 - Correlational research:
2.2.3 - Explanatory research:
2.2.4 - Exploratory research:
2.3 - Classification based on Inquiry Mode of Research
2.3.1 - Structured approach
2.3.2 - Unstructured approach
2.3.3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Methods
2.4 - Normal and Revolutionary Researches
2.5 - Characteristics of Research
3.0 Study Session Summary and Conclusion
4.0 Self-Assessment Questions
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out of Class activities)
6.0 References/Further Readings
Introduction
Welcome to study session two of this course. So far, we have learnt the general
meaning and importance of research. This session will introduce types of research.
Fundamentally, research can be classified into two perspectives. That is, the
purpose for which it is being conducted and the method by which it is conducted.
More specifically, students will learn about pure research, applied research,
descriptive research, correlational research, explorative research, experimental
research as well as qualitative and quantitative research in this session. Before we
Pure Research: This involves developing and testing theories and hypotheses that
are intellectually challenging to the researcher. They might or might not have
practical application at the present time or in the future. The key thing to be noted
is that the knowledge produced through pure research is sought in order to add to
the existing body of knowledge and literature.
Structured approach
The structured approach to inquiry is usually classified as quantitative research. In
this case, everything that forms the research process such as objectives, design,
sample and the questions to be asked of respondents is predetermined. It is more
appropriate to determine the extent of a problem, issue or phenomenon by
quantifying the variation. For example: how many people have a particular
problem? How many people hold a particular attitude?
Unstructured approach
The unstructured approach to inquiry is usually classified as qualitative research.
This approach allows flexibility in all aspects of the research process. It explores
the nature of a problem, issue or phenomenon without quantifying it. The main
objective of unstructured approach is to describe the variations in a phenomenon,
situation or attitude. Examples are: description of an observed situation; the
historical enumeration of events; an account of different opinions people have
about an issue; and description of working condition in particular work places etc.
However, both approaches have their place in research. Both have their strengths
and weaknesses. In some studies, a researcher may have to combine both
qualitative and quantitative approaches. An example is finding the types of cuisine
/ accommodation available in a city and the extent of their popularity. Hence, the
types of cuisine are the qualitative aspect of the study as finding out about them
entails description of the culture and cuisine. Whereas the extent of their popularity
is the quantitative aspect as it involves estimating the number of people who visit
restaurants serving such cuisine and calculating the other indicators that reflect the
extent of popularity.
26 Distance Learning Centre ABU, Course Material
Libs 803: Research Methodology
ITQ: What are the classifications of research based on inquiry method used?
ITA: Structured and Unstructured approaches
Things are measured and weighted in the study of substance or structure. For
instance, can patterns of whatever be measured or weighted? Certainly, they cannot
be measured or weighted Thus, to study patterns; there is the need to map a
configuration of relationships. That is, structures involve quantities whereas
patterns involve qualities. If one wishes to investigate why certain data are random,
then it is a qualitative research. If the aim is to study how random data is, what is
the mean, variance and distribution function? It then becomes quantitative.
Explaining how digestion of food takes place in our body is a qualitative
description. It does not involve any numbers or data and quantities. However, the
detection of a particular compound is a qualitative analysis. This can be done by
carrying out physical or chemical tests.
Determination of exact amount of a
particular compound present in a volume
is essentially quantitative analysis. This
can be done by volumetric, gravimetric
and colorimetric methods or instrumental
methods. Experimental and simulation
studies are generally quantitative
Fig 1.2.3: Characteristics of Research
research.
In fact, qualitative methods can be used to understand the meaning of the numbers
obtained by quantitative methods.
ITQ: what is the major difference between quantitative and qualitative researches?
ITA: quantitative researches study the relationship between two or more variables using
numerals while qualitative researches explore a phenomenon of interest by trying to
understand the meaning that participants being studied ascribe to the phenomenon.
Among scientist, a tense situation then ensures, which increase in intensity until a
scientific revolution is reached. This is marked by a paradigm shift and a new
paradigm emerges under which normal scientific activity can be resumed.
ITA: Any research that is conducted in accordance with set rules, concepts and procedures
(paradigm) of a particular discipline.
Controlled: In real life there are many factors that affect an outcome. The concept
of control implies that, in exploring causality in relation to two variables (factors),
one sets up a study in a way that minimise the effects of other factors affecting the
relationship. This can be achieved to a large extent in the physical sciences
Distance Learning Centre ABU, Course Material 29
Libs 803: Research Methodology
Rigorous: There is the need to be careful in ensuring that the procedures being
followed to find answers to questions are relevant, appropriate and justified.
However, the degree of rigour may vary markedly between the physical and social
sciences and within the social sciences.
Valid and verifiable: This concept implies that whatever is concluded on the basis
of findings is considered to be correct and can be verified by whomever.
Empirical: This means that any conclusion drawn is based upon hard evidence
gathered from information collected from real life experiences or observations.
Critical: Critical scrutiny of the procedures used and the methods employed is
crucial to a research enquiry. The process of investigation must be fool proof and
free from drawbacks. The process adopted and the procedures used must be able to
withstand critical scrutiny.
For a process to be called research, it is imperative that it has the above
characteristics.
3.0 Conclusion/Summary
This session has introduced students to the various types of research.
Fundamentally, research can be classified into two perspectives; the purpose for
which it was conducted and the method by which it is conducted. More
specifically, the pure research, applied research, descriptive research, correlational
30 Distance Learning Centre ABU, Course Material
Libs 803: Research Methodology
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out of Class activities) e.g.
a. Visit U-tube add https://goo.gl/fWkoHj , https://goo.gl/CkyoCY. Watch the
video & summarise in 1 paragraph
b. View the animation on add/site https://bit.ly/2JBWivY and critique it in the
discussion forum
Study Session 3
Ethical Issues in Research
Introduction
This is study session 3. In the previous session, effort was made to explore the
world of research and its types.
This session will further enhance students‘ understanding of research as they will
learn the ethics of research. Research is primarily driven by the desire for new
knowledge and understanding of phenomena beneficial to the target audience and
the society at large.
As a researcher, one has a clear responsibility to ensure that the rights and general
well-being of participants are recognized and protected regardless of the nature of
the research. Codes of practice in research provide guidelines that reinforce the
basic principles of both human rights and ethics. Many ethical aspects are legally
enforceable (Eby, 1985).
It has been discovered that the Nazi atrocities during the Second World War,
significantly violated the basic principles of human rights as a result of which, the
first code of practice for ethical research was developed (Dempsey and Dempsey,
1992) (The Nuremburg Code of Ethical Practice). This provided the basis for the
development of the recommendations involving Human Subjects (Declaration of
Helsinki) adopted by the World Medical Assembly in 1964. This clearly
differentiates between therapeutic and non-therapeutic research (Levine, 1979) viz:
The Helsinki Declaration illustrates the ethical issues that must be considered in
undertaking research involving human participations. Such issues are based on
respect for human dignity, autonomy (self-determination), truth (veracity) and
justice. There must be no preferential advantage to potential participants and there
must be no inducement to participate.
These considerations have been defined as reflecting the conflict between the
protection of human rights and the generation of knowledge (Ford and Reuter,
1990). This means that researchers (you) must take particular care to ensure that
people are not exploited or harmed in anyway by the conduct of research. Though
this may be difficult to achieve since it is possible that the work was designed to
generate knowledge that will ultimately have many benefits in the short term at
least, or at best has no effect; and at worst, be clearly deleterious to those
concerned.
ITQ: What are the two kinds of research that was agreed upon in the Helsinki Declaration?
2.2 Why does Research with Human Participants Requires Ethical approval?
Ethics approval for research with human participants is needed for the following
reasons:
1. to protect the rights and welfare of participants and minimise the risk of
physical and mental discomfort, harm and/or danger from research procedures;
2. to protect the rights of researcher to carry out any legitimate investigation as
well as the reputation of University for research conducted and/or sponsored
by it;
3. to minimise the likelihood of claims of negligence against individual
researchers, the university and any collaborating persons or organizations; and
4. the Research Funding bodies and refereed journals increasingly require a
statement of ethical practices in applications for research funds and/or as a
condition for publication.
ITQ: Give one reason why research involving human subjects requires ethical approval?
ITA: to protect the rights and welfare of the participants and minimise the risk of physical and
mental discomfort, harm and/or danger from research procedures.
2.3.2 Free and Informed Consent: Informed consent comprises three major
elements. They are: information, voluntariness and comprehension. When
providing information as a researcher, ensure that participants are given sufficient
detail about the nature of the research and the procedures involved. This should
highlight the objectives of the study, potential risks and benefits and any
alternative treatments must be made clear. Voluntariness in research is important.
Consent must be freely given and may be withdrawn at any time.
Undue influence may take the form of inducement, deprivation or exercise of
control, or authority over prospective participants. This is particularly important in
research involving vulnerable people. Its absent when consent is secured by the
order of authorities or as a result of
coercion or manipulation. It should be
noted that voluntary participation implies
that participants make an informed choice
while informed consent assumes that the
information given is accurate. In practical
terms, within an ethics review process, this
translates into scrutiny of the process,
Fig 1.3.2: Free and Informed Consent
rights, duties and requirements for free and
2.3.4 Respect for Vulnerable Persons: It should note that, vulnerable individuals,
such as the old, the young, the sick or the mentally impaired are entitled to
participate in research on grounds of human dignity, caring, fairness, and
special protection against abuse, discrimination, deception or exploitation.
Ethical obligations to vulnerable individuals in the conduct of research will often
necessitate special procedures to protect their interests. These must be
demonstrated where appropriate.
All research proposals must demonstrate that ethical principles are upheld as well
as the procedure to be followed in data storage and retention. Further details are
available in the Code of Conduct: Practice for Research Involving Human
Participants (CCCU, 2006), and Data Protection in Research (CCCU 2006).
2.3.5 Justice and Inclusiveness: In this context, justice connotes fairness and
equity for all research participants. Procedurally, justice requires that ethics review
processes involve methods that are fair and transparent based on established
standards and procedures for reviewing research protocols and processes. Justice
also concerns the distribution of benefits and burdens of research.
On the one hand, justice can be distributive when it is directed towards ensuring
that no segment of research population is unfairly burdened with the harms of
research and no individual or group is neglected or discriminated against. The
principle of justice thus imposes particular obligations toward individuals who are
vulnerable and unable to protect their own interests in order to ensure that they are
not exploited for the advancement of knowledge.
2.3.6 Harms and Benefits: The analysis, balance and distribution of harms and
benefits are central to research ethics. Modern research ethics requires a favourable
harms-benefit balance so that the foreseeable harms should not outweigh
anticipated benefits. Harms and benefits analysis thus affects the welfare and rights
of research participants. It is acknowledged however, that, research involves
advancing the frontiers of knowledge and undertaking it could involve uncertainty
about the magnitude and/or kind of benefits or harms associated with
individual research projects. This imposes particular ethical obligations on
researchers to ensure the scientific validity, design and conduct of their research.
ITQ: Explain why free and informed consent is relevant in research process?
ITA: Participants’ consent must be freely given and may be withdrawn at any time. Undue
influence of participants may take the form of inducement, deprivation, exercise of control, or
authority over prospective participants. This is particularly important in research involving
vulnerable people. It can be absent if consent is secured by the order of authorities or as a
result of coercion or manipulation. Voluntary participation implies that participants make an
informed choice while informed consent assumes that the information given is accurate.
This can have important practical implications. Researchers must recognise that
those asked to participate in research by, for example, their caregiver (e.g., nurse,
midwife or therapist) or teacher, may be persuaded to participate by factors
unrelated to the research itself. Rather, it could be by any true assessment of the
benefits and harms of participation. Care must be taken to ensure that this does not
occur. Thus, placing additional demands on researcher for accuracy, candour,
objectivity and sensitivity in informing potential participants about proposed
research may not be necessary.
Researchers and Research Ethics Committees must recognise that there are
legitimate situations in which research may be opposed to the interests of the
research participants. This is particularly true of research in the social sciences and
the humanities that is seeking to investigate policy or organisations. It may also
apply to experimental studies involving a controlled group and/or the use of
placebos. While it is crucial that such research is carried out according to
professional standards, it should not be blocked through the use of harms/benefits
analysis. It may not involve collaboration with the research participants or because
of the potentially negative nature of the findings. Negative findings may be as
important as positive ones in determining future policy
ITQ: Why is it important to approach ethics of research from the participants’ perspective?
ITA: Individual participants within the same study may respond very differently to the
information provided in the free and informed consent process. Tthis can be important. The
individual perspectives must be considered. It is for this reason that lay members are included
in all Research Ethics Committees.
Research involving human participants‘ issues should take into account whether
the research has been done before and whether there are consistent results in the
area of study. This could be based on examination of the literature review and the
justification of the need for the study.
Unforeseen needs: Clear plans must be in place to address particular needs that
may arise during the course of any research but which may lie outside the
researcher's knowledge, skills or expertise, bearing in mind the need for
confidentiality. The subject's permission must be obtained before disclosing any
information to a third party.
ITA: Decisions related to sampling may have significant impact on the meaning that can be
attributed to the findings. The size of sample must be considered and justified to ensure that it
is sufficient to provide valid and generalisable results
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out of Class activities) e.g.
a. Visit U-tube add https://goo.gl/BrZn9j , https://goo.gl/tDGyHy). Watch the
video & summarise in 1 paragraph
b. View the animation on add/site https://bit.ly/2EnpnH9 and critique it in the
discussion forum
Module 2
The Research Process
Content:
Study Session 1: Identifying and Formulating research problem
Study Session 2: Literature Review and Theoretical Framework
Study Session 3: Research objective and Variable Measurement
Study Session 4: The Research Design
Study Session 1
Identifying and Formulating Research Problem
Introduction
There are practical steps through which a researcher must pass through in a
research journey in order to find answers to research questions. The path to finding
answers to research questions constitutes what is called research methodology. At
each operational step in research process, researcher is required to choose from a
multiplicity of methods, procedures and models of research methodology which
will help to achieve the objectives.
This session will take you through the first step of research process. More
specifically, they will learn how to identify and formulate research problem(s) and
what to consider when choosing a research topic for project of study.
It is a fact that our daily experiences and the day to day affairs have rich openings
on various aspects such as the daunting tasks of AIDS, air pollution, afforestation
and deforestation, child labour, problems of aged citizens, racial discrimination,
gender violence, insecurity and insurgency, banditry and kidnapping, etc.
In each subject there are several topics which are not explored in detail, even
though the topic was considered by scientists‘ long time ago. For example, string
theory, quantum computing, Nanoparticles, and quantum cloning and quantum
cryptography and gene immunology are fascinating topics and are in preliminary
stages.
The supervisors and experts working on one or few fields over a long time are the
specialists in the field They are considered well versed with the developments and
current status of the field. A researcher can make use of expertise in knowing
various possible problems in a topic to be solved or resolved by providing better
opportunities in all aspects. Do not choose a topic simply because it is fascinating.
In choosing a topic, it is necessary to take care of the possibility of data collection,
quantity of gain, breadth of the topic and so on.
Research topic should not be too narrow. For example, the study of social status
and sexual life of married couples of same sex (man-man marriage and woman-
woman marriage) is interesting and it is of social relevance. However, the intricate
problem is that there are not enough number of such known couples in the country
to study. Thus, such topic is very narrow and at the same time the researcher may
not get enough data to analyse. On the other hand, the changes in the social life of
caravans in recent times are valuable social problems and one can collect enough
data to analyse.
ITQ: What are the sources from where a researcher can identify a topic?
ITA: 1) theory of one’s own interest 2) daily problems 3) technological changes 4) recent
trends 5) unexplored areas 6) discussion with experts and research supervisor
Stating the problem in the form of statements or questions which makes the
problem clear and understandable;
1. Identification and Operationalisation of the variables concisely, and
2. Evaluating the problem in terms of its significance, novelty and feasibility.
ITA: i) stating the problem in the form of statements or questions which makes the problem
clear and understandable. ii) identification and operationalisation of the variables concisely,
and iii) evaluating the problem in terms of its significance, novelty and feasibility.
Let us study each step and see how we can apply them in our practical MIM
research.
Defining your research problem is more important than its solution. It is a crucial
part of the research study and should not be defined in a hurry. But, how do you
assess whether the defined problem is a good problem? A problem in its first
definition may not be appealing. It may require redefinition in order to make it a
good problem. That is, by suitably rewording or reformulating the chosen problem,
it can be made to meet the criteria of a good problem. This is also important to
solve the problem successfully. To this end you as a researcher can ask a series of
questions on your problem. Some are:
1. Is the problem really interesting to me and to the scientific community?
2. Is the problem significant to the present status of the topic?
3. Is there sufficient supervision/guidance?
4. Can the problem be solved in the required time frame?
5. Are there necessary equipment, adequate library and computational facilities
among others?
If the answers to these questions are satisfactory, then you can initiate work on the
chosen problem. In addition, discuss the problem with the current doctoral
candidates and obtain the scope of the problem and other related aspects.
raised must be related to the problem. Each major issue or element should be
separated into its subsidiary or secondary elements, and these should be arranged
in a logical order under the major divisions.
Operationalization of variables
In stating a problem, the researcher (you) should make sure that it is neither stated
in terms so general as to make it vague nor specified so narrowly as to make it
insignificant and trivial. The most important step in this direction is to specify the
variables involved in the problem and define them in operational terms. To
illustrate; suppose you state that you want to study the ―Effectiveness of Television
on the Performance of Students in Course One of Post Graduate Diploma in
Distance Education offered by the Indira Gandhi National Open University‖.
This statement is broad and it communicates in a general way what you want to do.
But it is necessary to specify the problem with much greater precision. For this,
your first step is to specify the variables involved in the problem and define them
in operational terms.
what you will do to measure the presence or absence of the phenomenon denoted
by the term ―effectiveness‖. Similarly, you have to define the other variable
―performance‖ also in terms of the operations or processes that will be used to
measure them. In this study, you might choose to define ―effectiveness‖ as the
improvement made by the diploma students in scores on a standardized
achievement test in Course One. The term ‗performance‘ might refer to the scores
on the achievement test in Course One.
It is worth nothing that the problem should be stated in a way that it indicates a
relationship between two or more variables. It should involve neither philosophical
issues, values nor questions of judgement that cannot be answered by scientific
investigations. For example, should television be more effective in increasing
performance level of students? Such value questions cannot be answered through
research. Similarly, the question ―what is there in television teaching that enhance
performances‖ is a philosophical question which cannot be probed easily.
to extend the validity of its findings in a situation entirely different from the
previous one.
iii) Is the problem significant?
The problem should be such that it is likely to fill in the gaps in the existing
knowledge, to help to solve some of the inconsistencies in the previous research, or
to help in the interpretation of the known facts.
The results or findings of a study should either become a basis for a theory,
generalisations or principles. Besides, they should lead to new problems for
further research or have some useful practical applications.
iv) Is the problem feasible for the particular research?
A research problem may be researchable, new or significant and yet not feasible
because of the following considerations:
a. Research Competencies: the problem should be in an area in which the
researcher is qualified and competent. He/she must possess the necessary skills and
competencies that may be needed to develop and administer the data gathering
tools, and interpret the data available for analysis. The researcher should also
have the necessary knowledge of research design, qualitative and quantitative
techniques of data analysis etc. that may be required to carry out the research to its
completion.
b. Interest and enthusiasm: The researcher should be genuinely interested in
and enthusiastic about the problem he/she wants to undertake for research.
c. Financial considerations and feasibility: The problem should be
financially feasible. The researcher should ascertain whether he/she has the
necessary financial and temporal resources to carry on the study. Each project has
a cost, particularly in the case of projects where students are dispersed. The cost is
an important element in feasibility. It is important to estimate the cost of the
project and assess the availability of funds. This will determine whether the project
can be actually executed.
d. Administrative considerations: In addition to personal limitations,
financial and time constraints, the researcher should also consider the
administrative facilities that are needed to complete the study successfully.
He/she should check whether he/she is able to get the cooperation from various
administrative authorities for collecting various types of data.
e. Times: projects are a time bound exercise. Most of you if not all are already
engaged in more than one activity in office, at home and at completing a study.
For instance, if you wish to study instructional transactions in personal contact
programmes, your project must be timed so that you can actually observe a series
of sessions in personal contact programmes.
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out of Class activities) e.g.
a. Visit U-tube add https://goo.gl/RVknVc , https://goo.gl/SP54pN. Watch the
video & summarise in 1 paragraph
b. View the animation on add/site https://bit.ly/2MfPrtU and critique it in the
discussion forum
Study Session 2
Literature Review and Theoretical Framework
Section and Subsection Headings
Introduction
1.0 Learning Outcomes
2.0 Main Content:
2.1 - Review of Literature
2.2 - Search for existing literature
2.2.1 - Books
2.2.2 - Journals
2.3 - Review the literature selected
2.4 - Develop a theoretical framework
3.0 Study Session Summary and Conclusion
4.0 Self-Assessment Questions
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out of Class activities)
7.0 References/Further Readings
Introduction
You are welcome to study session 2. In the previous session, we found out that
there are practical steps through which you must pass while undertaking your
research project in order to find answers to your research questions. Extensive
literature review is the second step you need to follow. Thus, this session will take
you through the second step of research process.
It is very important you review literature because of the role it plays in research.
Its functions are:
1. Bring clarity and focus to your research problem;
2. Improve your methodology;
3. Broaden your knowledge;
4. Contextualise your findings.
Books
Books comprise a central part of any bibliography. Its advantage is that material
published generally is of good quality and the findings are integrated with other
research to form a coherent body of knowledge. On the other hand, its
disadvantage is that material is not completely up to date, as it can take a few years
between the completion of a work and publication in the form of a book. Search
for books in your area of interest, prepare a final list, locate these books in the
libraries or borrow from other sources. Examine their content, if contents are not
found to be relevant to your topic, delete it from your reading list.
Journals
Journals provide you with the most up-to-date information, even though there is a
gap of two to three years between the completion of a research project and the
publication in a journal. Just like books, you need to prepare a list of journals for
identifying literature relevant to your study. This can be done thus:
1. Locate the hard copies of the journal that are appropriate to your study;
2. Use the internet;
3. Look at the index of research abstracts in the relevant field to identify and
read the articles.
Whichever method you choose; first, identify the journals you want to look at in
detail for your review of literature. Select the latest issue; examine its content page
to see if there is an article of relevance to your research topic. If you feel a
particular article is of relevance to you, read it‘s abstract. If you think you are
likely to use it, photocopy or prepare a summary and record it for reference or
later use.
Once you develop a rough framework, slot the findings from the material so far
reviewed into that framework, using a separate sheet of paper for each theme of
that frame work. As you read further, go on slotting the information where it
logically belongs under the theme so far developed. You may need to add more
themes as you go. Read critically with particular reference to the following
aspects:
1. Note whether the knowledge relevant to your theoretical framework is
confirmed beyond doubt.
2. Note the theories put forward, the criticisms of these and their basis, the
methodologies adopted and the criticisms of them.
3. Examine to what extent the findings can be generalised to other situations.
Ascertain the areas in which little or nothing is known. That is the gaps that exist in
the body of knowledge.
In order to comply with the second function of literature review i.e. contextualising
the findings of your study, you are requires to systematically compare your
findings with those made by others. Quote from these studies to show how your
findings contradict, confirm or add to them. It places your findings in the context
of what others have found out. This function is undertaken when writing about
your findings i.e. after analysis of your data.
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out of Class activities) e.g.
a. Visit U-tube add https://goo.gl/BFgs7j , https://goo.gl/2LnXdo. Watch the
video & summarise in 1 paragraph
b. View the animation on add/site https://bit.ly/2Ew3B46 and critique it in the
discussion forum
Study Session 3
Research objective and Variable Measurement
Section and Subsection Headings
Introduction
1.0 Learning Outcomes
2.0 Main Content:
2.1 - Formulation of Research Objectives
2.2 - Characteristics of Objectives
2.3 - The definition of a variable
2.3.1 - The difference between a concept and a variable:
2.3.2 - Concepts, indicators and variables:
2.4 - Types of measurement scales:
2.4.1 - The nominal or classificatory scale:
2.4.2 - The ordinal or ranking scale
2.4.3 - The interval scale
2.4.4 - The ratio scale
2.5 - Constructing hypotheses
2.5.1 - The functions of hypotheses
3.0 Study Session Summary and Conclusion
4.0 Self-Assessment Questions
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out of Class activities)
6.0 References/Further Readings
Introduction
You are welcome to study session 3, we did mentioned before that your research
project required some practical steps you must follow, in order to find solution to
your research problem. After you have identified and formulated your research
problem and you have reviewed literature on the subject area, the next step is for
you to formulate your research objectives and know how to measure your
dependent and independent variables.
The sub-objectives are the specific aspects of the topic that you want to investigate
within the main framework of your study.
1. They should be numerically listed.
2. Wording should be clear, complete and specific.
3. Communicate to your readers your intention.
ITA: The main objective is an overall statement of the thrust of your study. It is also a statement
of the main associations and relationships that you seek to discover or establish.
Identifying Variables:
In a research study it is important that the concepts used should be operationalized
in measurable terms, so that the extent of variations in respondents‘ understanding
is reduced if not eliminated.
You see, when people express these feelings or preferences, they do so on the basis
of certain criteria in their minds. Their judgment is based upon indicators that lead
them to conclude and express that opinion.
These are judgments that require a sound basis on which to proclaim. This warrant
the use of a measuring mechanism and it is in the process of measurement that
knowledge about variables plays an important role.
ITA: Concepts are mental images or perceptions and therefore their meaning varies
markedly from individual to individual. A concept cannot be measured whereas a variable
can be subjected to measurement by crude/refined or subjective/objective units of
measurement.
3. Ratio scale
Let us study each of this scale so that you will be able to use any of them more
effectively, when undertaking your research projects.
2. A hypothesis tells you what data to collect and what not to collect, thereby
providing focus to the study.
3. As it provides a focus, the construction of a hypothesis enhances objectivity
in a study.
4. A hypothesis may enable you to add to the formulation of a theory. It
enables you to specifically conclude what is true or what is false.
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out of Class activities) e.g.
a. Visit U-tube add https://goo.gl/VdQRrM , https://goo.gl/9fjBGz. Watch the
video & summarise in 1 paragraph
b. View the animation on add/site https://bit.ly/2JAEC3O and critique it in the
discussion forum
Study Session 4
The Research Design
Section and Subsection Headings
Introduction
1.0 Learning Outcomes
2.0 Main Content:
2.1 - The Research Design
2.1.1 - Preparing the Research Design
2.1.2 - Objectives of the Research Study:
2.1.3 - Methods of Data Collection:
2.2 - Methods of Primary Data Collection
2.2.1 - Observation Method
2.2.2 - Survey Method
2.2.3 - Contact Methods:
2.2.4 - Experimental Method
3.0 Study Session Summary and Conclusion
4.0 Self-Assessment Questions
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out of Class activities)
6.0 References/Further Readings
Introduction
You are welcome to study session 4, After you have successfully formulated your
research objectives and known how to measure your dependent and independent
variables. The next step is to define your research design. In this session, you will
learn how to prepare a research design, various methods of data collections, their
advantages and disadvantages. However, it will be more informed if we first of all
know the learning outcome of this study session before we continue.
Essentially, the research design creates the foundation of the entire research
work.
The design will help you perform the chosen task easily and in a systematic way.
Once the research design is completed the actual work can be initiated.
The first step in the actual work is to learn the facts pertaining to the problem.
Particularly, theoretical methods, numerical techniques, experimental techniques
and other relevant data and tools necessary for the present study have to be
collected and learnt. It is not necessary that every theory, technique and
information in the topic of research is useful for a particular problem. A researcher
has to identify and select materials which are useful to the present work.
Further, the validity and utility of the information gathered should be tested before
using them. Scientific research is based on certain mathematical, numerical and
experimental methods. These sources have to be properly studied and judged
before applying them to the problem of interest.
2.1.3 Methods of data collection: There are two types of data you can use for
your research. They include:
1. Primary Data: collected for the first time
2. Secondary Data: those which have already been collected and analysed by
someone else.
Now that you know primary and secondary sources of data collection, how or
through what means can you gather the data you need for your study? Let us start
with the primary method of data collections.
Let us learn how and where we can use them one by one.
Observation can yield information which people are normally unwilling or unable
to provide. E.g. observing numerous plates containing uneaten portions - the
same menu items indicates that food is not satisfactory.
Types of observation:
1. Structured – for descriptive research
2. Unstructured—for exploratory research
3. Participant Observation
4. Non- participant observation
5. Disguised observation
6.
Mutations:
1. Feelings, beliefs and attitudes that motivate buying behaviour and infrequent
behaviour cannot be observed.
2. Expensive method. This often makes researchers to supplement observation
with survey research.
From the response, the researcher may be able to discover why the consumer
avoids MacDonald‘s. It may suggest factors of which the consumer is not
consciously aware.
Advantages:
1. Survey method of data collection can be used to collect many different kinds
of information.
2. Survey method of data collection is quick and low cost as compared to
observation and experimental method.
Limitations:
1. The survey approach allows respondent‘s reluctance to answer questions
asked by unknown interviewers about things they consider private.
2. Busy people may not want to take the time to answer the questions.
3. The respondent may try to help by giving pleasant answers.
4. Unable to answer because they cannot remember or never gave a thought to
what they do and why.
5. The respondent may answer in order to look smart or well informed.
Mail Questionnaires:
Advantages:
1. This approach can be used to collect large amounts of information at a low
cost per respondent.
2. The respondents may give more honest answers to personal questions on a
mail questionnaire.
3. No interviewer is involved to bias the respondent‘s answers.
4. This method is convenient for respondents who can answer when they have
time.
5. This approach is a good way to reach people who often travel.
Limitations:
1. This approach is not flexible
Telephone interviewing:
Advantages:
1. This method is quick
2. It is more flexible as interviewer can explain questions not understood by the
respondent
3. Depending on respondent‘s answer, they can skip some questions and probe
more on others
4. It allows greater sample control
5. Response rate tends to be higher than mail
Drawbacks:
1. Cost per respondent is higher
2. Some people may not want to discuss personal questions with interviewer
3. Interviewer‘s manner of speaking may affect the respondent‘s answers
4. Different interviewers may interpret and record response in a variety of ways
5. Under time pressure, data may be entered without actually interviewing
Personal interviewing:
This approach is very flexible and can be used to collect large amounts of
information. Trained interviewers can hold the respondent‘s attention and are
available to clarify difficult questions. They can guide interviews, explore issues,
and probe as the situation requires. Personal interview can be used in any type of
questionnaire and can be conducted fairly quickly. Interviewers can also show
actual products, advertisements, packages and observe and record their reactions
and behaviour.
Intercept interviewing:
This type of interview is widely used in tourism research.
1. It allows researcher to reach known people in a short period of time.
2. Is the only method of reaching people whose names and addresses are
unknown?
3. It involves talking to people at homes, offices, on the street, or in shopping
malls.
4. Interviewer must gain the interviewee‘s cooperation.
5. Time involved may range from a few minutes to several hours (for longer
surveys compensation may be offered)
6. It involves the use of judgmental sampling i.e. interviewer has guidelines as
to whom to ―intercept‖, such as 25% under age 20 and 75% over age 60
Drawbacks:
1. This method often gives room for error and bias on the part of the
interviewer who may not be able to correctly judge age, race etc.
2. Interviewer may be uncomfortable talking to certain ethnic or age groups.
The meeting is held in a pleasant place, and refreshments are served to create a
relaxed environment. The moderator needs objectivity, knowledge of the subject
and industry, and some understanding of group and consumer behaviour. The
moderator starts with a broad question before moving to more specific issues,
encouraging open and easy discussion to bring out true feelings and thoughts. At
the same time, the interviewer focuses the discussion, hence the name focus group
interviewing.
Advantage
It is often held to help determine the subject areas on which questions should be
asked in a later, large-scale, structured-direct interview. Comments are recorded
through note taking or videotaped and studied later to understand consumer‘
buying process. This method is especially suited for managers of hotels and
restaurants, who have easy access to their customers. E.g. some hotel managers
often invite a group of hotel guests from a particular market segment to have a free
breakfast with them. Managers get the chance to meet the guests and discuss what
they like about the hotel and what the hotel could do to make their stay more
enjoyable and comfortable. The guests appreciate this recognition and the manager
gets valuable information. Restaurant managers use the same approach by holding
discussion meetings over lunch or dinner.
Drawbacks
1. Cost: may cost more than telephone survey
2. Sampling: group interview studies keep small sample size to keep time and
cost down, therefore; it may be difficult to generalise from the results
3. Interviewer biasness is possible
1. Then work to get enough facts (data) to prove or disprove the hypothesis.
2. He then sets up experimental designs which he thinks will manipulate the
persons or the materials concerned, so as to bring forth the desired
information.
Evidence gathered through experimental or empirical studies today is considered to
be the most powerful support possible for a given hypothesis.
4.0Self-Assessment Questions
1. In your own understanding, what is research design?
2. Choose a research topic and discuss the research design that will be
appropriate for addressing the research problem.
3. Discuss the considerations that need to be followed in preparing the research
design.
4. Assuming you are undertaking research that requires you to use primary data
in you analysis. Discuss the available method you can use.
5. Choose a research topic and explain why survey research design is more
appropriate for the study. Explain the instrument you can use to collect the
data for the chosen topic.
6. Discuss the types of survey research design and explain the difference
between cross sectional and longitudinal survey.
7. Explain the advantages and disadvantages of various methods of collecting
primary data.
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out of Class activities) e.g.
a. Visit U-tube add https://goo.gl/FZYMyS , https://goo.gl/vj74F7. Watch the
video & summarise in 1 paragraph
b. View the animation on add/site https://bit.ly/2JCQcvc and critique it in the
discussion forum
Module 3
Data Presentation and Analysis
Content:
Study Session 1: Sample Design and Instrument for Data Collection
Study Session 2: Data Collection and Analysis
Study Session 3: Reporting Research Findings
Study Session 4: The Research Hypothesis
Study Session 1
Sample Design and Instrument for Data
Introduction
You are welcome to study module 4 of this course. This session is a continuation
of research process we started in module two. This session will enlighten you on
how you can draw your sample size from the total population of your study. You
will also learn probability and nonprobability sampling, guideline on how to
construct a questionnaire and the various instruments of primary method of
data collections such as questionnaire, interview and observation.
1. Who will be surveyed? (The Sample): at this point, the researcher must
determine what type of information is needed and who is most likely to have
it.
2. How many people will be surveyed? (Sample Size): here, you should note
that large samples give more reliable results than small samples. However it
is not necessary to sample the entire target population.
3. How should the sample be chosen? (Sampling technique): Sample members
may be chosen at random from the entire population (probability sample) or
the researcher might select people who are easier to obtain information from
(non-probability sample). However, what your research project need will
determine which method is most effective.
4.
ITQ: what factors affect sample determination?
ITA: Who to Sample, sample size and Sampling technique
2. Judgment sample: This sample type gives you the opportunity to use your
judgment to select population members who are good prospects for
accurate information that you need.
3. Quota sample: under this sample, you as the researcher finds and interviews
a prescribed number of people in each of several categories.
The famous saying about computers- ―garbage in garbage out‖- is also applicable
for data collection. The research tool provides the input into a study and therefore
the quality and validity of the output (the findings), are solely dependent on it. Let
us quickly go through the guidelines to construct a research tool before we study
the instruments.
Since there are many ways to ask questions, the questionnaire is very flexible.
Questionnaire should be developed and tested carefully before being used on a
large-scale. There are three basic types of questionnaire:
1. Closed –ended
2. Open-ended
3. Combination of both
Let us now learn what each of these instruments constitutes.
1. Closed –ended Questionnaire: Closed ended questions include all possible
answers/prewritten response categories, and respondents are asked to choose
among them. E.g. multiple choice questions, scale questions. These type of
questions are used to generate statistics in quantitative research. As these
follow a set format, and most responses can be entered easily into a
computer for ease of analysis, greater numbers can be distributed.
2. Open-ended Questionnaire: Open-ended questions allow respondents to
answer in their own words. Questionnaire does not contain boxes to tick but
instead leaves a blank section for the respondent to write in an answer.
Whereas closed –ended questionnaires might be used to find out how many
people use a service, open-ended questionnaires might be used to find out
Distance Learning Centre ABU, Course Material 89
Libs 803: Research Methodology
what people think about a service. As there are no standard answers to these
questions, data analysis is more complex. As it is opinion which are sought
rather than numbers, fewer questionnaires need to be distributed.
3. Combination of both: This way it is possible to find out how many people
use a service and what they think of the service in the same form. It begins
with a series of closed –ended questions, with boxes to tick or scales to rank,
and then finish with a section of open-ended questions or more detailed
response.
How to construct questionnaires
Now that you have studied the three types of questionnaires and how they work,
how then can you construct a questionnaire? Before you construct a questionnaire,
you need to:
1. Decide which questionnaire to use- closed or open ended, self or interviewer
administered;
2. Decides on the wording and structure of questions: Questions should be kept
short and simple-avoid double barrelled i.e. two questions in one –ask two
questions rather than one. Avoid negative questions which have ‗not ’in
them as it is confusing for respondent to agree or disagree. Question should
not contain Prestige Bias – causing embarrassment or forcing the respondent
to give false answer in order to look good. Questions about educational
qualification or income might elicit this type of response. You should use
indirect questions for sensitive issues- in indirect questions respondents can
relate their answer to other people; If you use closed- ended questions- try
to make sure that all possible answers are covered so that respondents are
not constrained in their answer. ―Don‟t know‖ category also needs to be
added;
Avoid Leading Question: Do not lead the respondent to answer in a certain way.
e.g. ―How often do you wash your car?‖ assumes that respondent has a car and
he washes his car. Instead, ask a filter question to find if he has a car, and then, ‗If
you wash your car, how many times a year?‘
1. Length and ordering of the Questions: you are to keep the questionnaire as
short as possible. Ask easy questions that respondents will enjoy answering.
If you employ combined questionnaire, keep open ended questions for the
end. Your questions should be as interesting as possible and easy to follow
by varying type and length of question. Group questions into specific topic
as this makes it easier to understand and follow.
ITA: Open-ended, Closed-ended and the combination of open and close ended questionnaire
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out of Class activities) e.g.
a. Visit U-tube add https://goo.gl/NX8orT , https://goo.gl/cBrt16. Watch the
video & summarise in 1 paragraph
b. View the animation on add/site https://bit.ly/2X2bS75 , https://bit.ly/2F7TUtc
and critique it in the discussion forum
Study Session 2
Data Collection and Analysis
Introduction
You are welcome to study session 2. When you have successfully formulated your
research problem, developed your study design, constructed your research
instrument and selected your sample, you then proceed to collect the data from
which you will draw inferences and conclusions for your study. In this session, you
will learn how to collect data, the ethical issues that relate to both the
researcher and the research participant and how the collected data is analysed to
come up with a meaningful and reliable result. Depending upon your plans, you
might commence interviews, mail out a questionnaire, conduct experiments and/or
make observations.
marital status etc., are intrusive. In collecting data you need to be careful
about the sensitivities of your respondents. It is not unethical to ask such
questions provided that you tell your respondents the type of information
you are going to ask clearly and frankly, and give them sufficient time to
decide if they want to participate, without any major inducement.
5. The possibility of causing harm to participant: When you collect data
from respondents or involve subjects in an experiment, you need to examine
carefully whether their involvement is likely to harm them in anyway. Harm
includes a research that might include hazardous experiments, discomfort,
anxiety, harassment, invasion of privacy, or demeaning or dehumanising
procedures. If it is likely to, you must make sure that the risk is minimal i.e.
the extent of harm or discomfort is not greater that ordinarily encountered in
daily life. If the way information is sought creates anxiety or harassment,
you need to take steps to prevent this.
6. Maintaining confidentiality: Sharing information about a respondent with
others for purposes other than research is unethical. Sometimes you need to
identify your study population to put your findings into context. In such a
situation you need to make sure that at least the information provided by
respondents is kept anonymous. It is unethical to identify an individual‘s
responses. Therefore, you need to ensure that after the information has been
collected, the source cannot be known.
participate.
responses categorised under a theme. These themes become the basis for analysing
the text of unstructured interviews.
Step 2. Assign codes to the main themes: If you, the researcher wants to count the
number of times a theme has occurred in an interview, you need to select a few
responses to an open- ended question and identify the main themes. You continue
to identify these themes from the same question till a saturation point is reached.
Write these themes and assign a code to each of them, using numbers or keywords.
Step 3. Classify responses under the main themes: Having identified the themes,
the next step is to go through the transcripts of all the interviews and classify the
responses under the different themes.
Step 4. Integrate themes and responses into the text of your report: Having
identified responses that fall within different themes, the next step is to integrate
into the text of your report. While discussing the main themes that emerged from
their study, sometimes you can use verbatim responses to keep the feel of the
response. However, some researchers count how frequently a theme has occurred,
and then provide a sample of the responses. It entirely depends upon the way the
researcher wants to communicate the findings to the readers.
Quantitative data analysis: This method is most suitable for large well designed
and well administered surveys using properly constructed and worded
questionnaire. Data can be analysed either manually or with the help of a
computer.
Data analysis using a computer: If you want to analyse data using computer, you
should be familiar with the appropriate programme. In this area, knowledge
computer and statistics plays an important role. The most common software is
SPSS for windows. However, data input can be long and laborious process, and if
data is entered incorrectly, it will influence the final results.
ITA: Identify the main themes, Assign codes to the main themes, Classify responses under the
main themes, Integrate themes and responses into the text of your report
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out of Class activities) e.g.
a. Visit U-tube add https://goo.gl/FxJL54 , https://goo.gl/diq3Jh. Watch the
video & summarise in 1 paragraph
b. View the animation on add/site https://bit.ly/2wfcsmf , https://bit.ly/2HUVdf8
and critique it in the discussion forum
Study Session 3
The Research Hypothesis
Introduction
You are welcome to study session 4, this will be the last session we will discuss. It
guides the direction of your research study. After you have identified a problem,
you may formulate certain answers in the form of hypotheses. These guesses are
based on the past experiences or informal observation or information gained from
others. In this session, you will learn the basic characteristics of hypothesis,
importance of hypothesis, the types of hypothesis and how to formulate a good
hypothesis to guide the thought of research project.
It may be mentioned here that hypotheses are not essential to all researches,
particularly, in the early stages of exploration of a problem. And it should not be
assumed that failure to develop a hypothesis is necessarily a sign of lack of
scientific orientation. However, a hypothesis may be conceived as an assumption
which merits consideration and needs to be tested against the available empirical
evidence.
Declarative hypothesis
When a researcher makes a positive statement about the outcome of the study, we
get a declarative hypothesis. For example, the hypothesis „The performance of
the creative on problem solving tasks is significantly higher than the non-
creative” is stated in the declarative form. Here, the researcher makes an attempt
to predict the future outcome. This prediction is based on the theoretical
formulation of what should happen in a particular situation, if the explanations of
the behaviour (performance on problem solving tasks) which the researcher has
given in his/her theory are correct.
Null hypothesis
A null hypothesis is a non- directional hypothesis that proposes no difference or no
relationship. The usual form of such hypothesis is: ―There is no significant
difference between the performance of two groups of students, one following the
The proponents of null hypothesis emphasise that the researcher must remain
unbiased throughout his/her research efforts. This view is defended on the basis of
the fact that in this case the researcher neither predicts a result nor indicates a
preconceived attitude that may influence his/her behaviour during the conduct of
the study. On the other hand, those who criticise the use of null hypothesis argue
that the researcher should indicate the direction of the outcome of the study,
wherever possible. It is further argued that predicting the results of a study is less
awkward in phrasing a relationship, than in using the ‗no difference‘ phrase that is
usual in the null form.
Sometimes the null hypothesis is rejected only when the probability of it having
occurred by a mere chance is 1 out of 100 or .01 out of 1. In such instances, we
consider the probability of its having occurred by change to be too little to be
considered and we reject the chance component of the null hypothesis and take the
occurrence to be due to a genuine tendency.
Therefore, you have to exercise great restraint and display considerable patience
to keep yourself on the right path. You have to develop certain habits and attitudes,
besides saturating yourself with all the possible information about the problem and
also think open- minded about it before proceeding further in the conduct of the
study.
iv) Hypothesis from analogies, conversations, etc.: Analogies also lead a
researcher to clues that may prove to be useful in the formulation of hypotheses
and for finding solutions to problems. For example, a new social situation
resembles an old one with respect to a particular set of factors. If the researcher
knows that the factors correlate in a particular fashion in the old situation, he/she
may hypothesise in terms of trends in the relationship to be expected in the new
social situation. However, it is to be mentioned here that use of analogies must be
made cautiously as they are not fool- proof tools for finding solutions to
problems.
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out of Class activities) e.g.
a. Visit U-tube add https://goo.gl/diAWzq , https://goo.gl/1azFzc. Watch the
video & summarise in 1 paragraph
b. View the animation on add/site https://bit.ly/1tYwl9G and critique it in the
discussion forum
6.0 References
Beasley, M.R. and Jones, L.W. Physics Today. June, 1986. pp.36.
Kothari, C.R. (1985) Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New
Delhi: Wiley Eastern.
Phillips, E.M and Pugh, D.S. (1993) How to get a Ph.D. New Delhi: UBSPD.
Saravanavel, P. (1987) Research Methodology. (Kitab Mahal, Allahabad,).
Spangenburg, R. and Moser, D. K. (1999) The History of Science in the Eighteenth
Century. Hyderabad: University Press.
Warrier, B.S. (2006) The Hindu. 18 September, p.6; 30 October, p.6; 6 November,
p.6; 20 November, p.2; 27 November, p.4; 4 December, p.6 of Education
Plus.
Warrier, B.S. The Hindu: Common errors made in research in,
http://sociology.camden.rutgers.edu/jfm/tutorial/errors.htm, 11 May 2004.
Yenza Research methodology, in, http://
www.nrf.ac.za/yenza/research/internet.htm
Study Session 4
Reporting Research Findings
Introduction
You are welcome to study session 3, in this session, you will learn how to write a
research report. When you have successfully formulated your research problem,
developed your study design, constructed your research instrument, selected your
sample, collect your data and analysed it, you then draw inferences and
conclusions for your study. After that, you now write your report. Writing the
report is the last, and for many, the most difficult step of the research process.
Title Page:
1. title of the Research Project,
2. name of the researcher,
3. purpose of the research project, e.g. ―A research project submitted in partial
fulfilment of the requirements for the award of master in Business
Administration, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria‖, -date of publication.
Table of Contents
In this part you list the contents of the report, either in chapters or in subheadings
e.g.
Contents Page No
Introduction . . . . . . . . . 1
Chapter I Theoretical Framework and Review of Related Literature . 3
Chapter II Research Design . . . . . . . 30
Chapter III Data Analysis and Interpretation . . . . 35
Chapter IV Summary and Conclusion . . . . . 70
Suggestions for Further Research . . . . . . 75
References/ Bibliography
Appendices
Appendix I Questionnaire for Employees
Appendix II Questionnaire for Managers
List of Tables
This section includes title and page number of all tables e.g.
Table No. Title Page No
1 Income levels of Respondents 31
2 Age distribution of Respondents 35
List of Figures
This part contains title and page number of all graphs, pie charts etc. e.g. Figure
no. Title Page No
1. Pie Chart showing age distribution of respondents 33
2. Bar Graph showing popularity of menu items 37
Acknowledgements
Here the researcher may acknowledge Institute Principal, Faculty Guide-research
guide and technical guide, research participants, friends etc.
Introduction
This section introduces the research, setting out aims and objectives.
It includes a rationale for the research.
Research Design:
This section includes all practical details followed for research. After reading this,
any interested party should be able to replicate the research study. The methods
used for data collection, how many people took part, how they were chosen, what
tool was used for data collection, how the data was analysed etc.
Recommendations
If you have conducted a piece of research for a hotel or any other client
organisation, this section could be the most important part of the report. A list of
clear recommendations which you have developed from your research is included.
For Books
1. Authors surname (alphabetically), followed by their initials,
2. Date of publication
3. Title of book in italics
4. Place of publication, Publisher. E.g. Philip, T.E. (1986) Modern Cookery for
Teaching and Trade. Mumbai: Orient Longman.
Appendices:
If you have constructed a questionnaire or interview schedule for your research, it
may be useful to include them in your report as
an appendix. Appendices do not count towards
your total number of pages/words. It is a useful
way of including relevant material so that the
examiner can gain a deeper understanding of
your work by reading it.
ITA: It is a useful way of including relevant material so that the examiner can gain a deeper
understanding of your work by reading it.
Research methods help us collect samples, data and find a solution to a problem.
Particularly, scientific research methods call for explanations based on collected
facts, measurements and observations and not on reasoning alone. They accept
only those explanations which can be verified by experiments.
For example, you do not only need to know how to calculate mean, variance and
distribution function for a set of data, how to find a solution of a physical system
described by mathematical model, how to determine the roots of algebraic
equations and how to apply a particular method but you also need to know which is
a suitable method for the chosen problem, what is the order of accuracy of the
result of a method?, what the efficiency of the method is, and so on. Considerations
of these aspects constitute a research methodology.
More precisely, research methods help us get a solution to a problem. On the other
hand, research methodology is concerned with the explanation of the following:
(1) Why is a particular research study undertaken?
(2) How did one formulate a research problem?
Distance Learning Centre ABU, Course Material 117
Libs 803: Research Methodology
ITQ: what is the difference between research method and research methodology?
ITA: Research method is the way data is collected to find a solution to a research problem
while research methodology encompasses all the decisions taken to solve a research problem,
including the research method.
5.0 Additional Activities (Videos, Animations & Out of Class activities) e.g.
a. Visit U-tube add https://goo.gl/aV4awT , https://goo.gl/BJm97p. Watch the
video & summarise in 1 paragraph
b. View the animation on add/site https://bit.ly/2Wk7TWh and critique it in the
discussion forum
Glossary
Accuracy A term used in survey research to refer to the match
between the target population and the sample.
ANCOVA Same method as ANOVA, but analyzes differences
(Analysis of Co- between dependent variables.
Variance)
ANOVA (Analysis A method of statistical analysis broadly applicable
of Variance) to a number of research designs, used to determine
differences among the means of two or more groups
on a variable. The independent variables are usually
nominal, and the dependent variable is usual an
interval.
Apparency Clear, understandable representation of the data
Bell curve A frequency distribution statistics. Normal
distribution is shaped like a bell.
Case Study The collection and presentation of detailed
information about a particular participant or small
group, frequently including the accounts of subjects
themselves.
Causal Model A model which represents a causal relationship
between two variables.
Causal The relationship established that shows that an
Relationship independent variable, and nothing else, causes a
change in a dependent variable. Establishes, also,
how much of a change is shown in the dependent
variable.
Causality The relation between cause and effect.
thedeviations.
Median The center score in a distribution.
Mental Models A group or network of interrelated concepts that
reflect conscious or subconscious perceptions of
reality. These internal mental networks of meaning
are constructed as people draw inferences and
gather information about the world.
Mode The most frequent score in a distribution.
Multi-Modal A research approach that employs a variety of
Methods methods; see also triangulation
Narrative Inquiry A qualitative research approach based on a
researcher's narrative account of the investigation,
not to be confused with a narrative examined by the
researcher as data
Naturalistic Observational research of a group in its natural
Inquiry setting
Node In hypertext, each unit of information, connected by
links
Nominal Variable A variable determined by categories which cannot
be ordered, e.g., gender and color
Normal A normal frequency distribution representing the
distribution probability that a majority of randomly selected
members of a population will fall within the middle
of the distribution. Represented by the bell curve.
Ordinal Variable A variable in which the order of data points can be
determined but not the distance between data
points, e.g., letter grades
Parameter A coefficient or value for the population that
corresponds to a particular statistic from
Distance Learning Centre ABU, Course Material 129
Libs 803: Research Methodology
generalization.
Serial Effect In survey research, a situation where questions may
"lead" participant responses through establishing a
certain tone early in the questionnaire. The serial
effect may accrue as several questions establish a
pattern of response in the participant, biasing
results.
Short-term Studies that list or present findings of short-term
observation qualitative study based on recorded observation
Skewed Any distribution which is not normal, that is not
Distribution symmetrical along the x-axis
Stability The agreement of measuring instruments over time.
Reliability
Standard A term used in statistical analysis. A measure of
Deviation variation that indicates the typical distance between
the scores of adistribution and the mean; it is
determined by taking the square root of the average
of the squared deviations in a given distribution.It
can be used to indicate the proportion of data within
certain ranges of scale values when the distribution
conforms closely to the normal curve.
Standard Error A term used in statistical analysis. A computed
(S.E.) of the Mean value based on the size of the sample and the
standard deviation of the distribution, indicating the
range within which the mean of the population is
likely to be from the mean of the sample at a given
level of probability (Alreck, 456).
Survey A research tool that includes at least one question
which is either open-ended or close-ended and
employs an oral or written method for asking these
questions. The goal of a survey is to gain specific
Distance Learning Centre ABU, Course Material 133
Libs 803: Research Methodology