How To File A Criminal Defamation Case
How To File A Criminal Defamation Case
ESSENTIALS OF DEFAMATION
TO SUM UP- • Civil suit can be filed under order 7 rule 1 of Civil Procedure
Code,1908, and a criminal case can be filed for offenses under sections 499 and 500
of Indian Penal Code,1860. Complaints about defamation will be prepared under
section 200 of the criminal procedure code,1973.
HOW LONG DOES THE PROCESS TAKE?
- Usually, the time taken, matters on the case and the circumstance. But approximately,
to issue summons in both cases requires 15 to 30 days.
HOW MUCH DOES IT COST?
- The cost depends on various factors, like the matter of fact of the case, the reputation
of the plaintiff, and the truth in the statement made or published.
- 7.5% of the claimed compensation in a ‘civil’ case must be given as a court fee
- The plaints are required to pay the court fees, as per the rules and regulations set by
the Court fees Stamp Act.
- The nominal court fee is then paid by the Complainant as required by the Court Fees
Stamp Act. The court fees usually amount to a nominal percentage of the value of a
claim or the suit being made in the case filed and thus, differs depending upon the
case.
HIGH COURT/SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT
- D.P.Choudhary v/s. Manjulatha: A publication was made in the local newspaper,
Dainik Navjyothi that the plaintiff a 17 year old college girl ran away with a boy after
she went out of the house by saying she was having lectures. This false news item had
adverse effects on her and ruined her marriage prospects. It was actionable per se and
she was awarded damages of Rs.10000/- by way of general damages.
- Ram Jethmalani Vs. Subramanian Swamy: The court held Dr.Swamy for defaming
Ram Jetmalani by saying that he received money from a banned organization to
protect the then Chief Minister if Tamil Nadu from the case of assassination of Rajiv
Gandhi.
- Arun Jaitley Vs. Arvind Kejriwal: The court held that statements made by Arvind
Kejriwal and his five other leaders to be defamatory. The matter was sort out when all
the defendants apologized for their actions.
- Ramdhara Vs. Phulwatibai: - The plaintiff, a widow of 45 years was imputed that
she is a keep of the maternal uncle of the plaintiff's daughter in law. The court held
that more than vulgar abuse it was an imputation up on her chastity and hence it
constitutes defamation.
- Shreya Singhal Vs. Union of India:It is a landmark judgement regarding internet
defamation. It held unconstitutional the Section 66A of the Information Technology
Act, 2000 which punishes for sending offensive messages through communication
services.