Ancient Historical Personality Task
Ancient Historical Personality Task
Task Name & Number Semester 1, Task 3 - Ancient Historical Personality - Empathy and
Perspective Task
Submission - Format Can be done in a variety of formats - attach to the assignment and submit
and Method via google classroom. Any links to third-party websites (e.g. youtube)
need to be accessible by the teacher (i.e. they shouldn’t have to sign up to
an account to view them)
Limits (time, length, Equivalent of 500 words (if done as a video or audio recording, submit the
etc.) written script as well)
Referencing You will need to ensure that you are correctly acknowledging your research and
sources throughout your task. You can use tools such as Citethisforme and other
referencing tools.
Walbank, F., 2020. Alexander the Great | Biography, Empire, Death, & Facts.
[online] Encyclopedia Britannica. Available at:
<https://www.britannica.com/biography/Alexander-the-Great#/media/1/14224/
158168> [Accessed 26 April 2021].
Task Details – Ancient Historical Personality Task
You can choose any real (preferably famous) person from one of the
Step 1 following ancient societies:
Egypt, Greece, Rome
Choose a India, China
personality
To make it interesting, choose someone unique - but make sure there is
some information available before diving in!
BE UNIQUE
Some examples include:
Egypt: Ramses the Great, Tutankhamun, Cleopatra, Hatshepsut
Greece: Aristotle, Euclid, Hippocrates, Alexander the Great, Queen
Gorgo, Artemisia
Rome: Julius Caesar, Augustus, Pompey the Great, Marcus Antonius,
Agrippina the Younger, Livia Drusilla, Spartacus
India: Ashoka the Great, Siddharta Gautama (Buddha), Chandragupta
Maurya, Queen Nayanika, Prabhavatigupta
China: Emperor Qin, Chinggis Khaan (Genghis Khan), Sun Tzu,
Confucius (Kongfuzi), Laozi, Kublai Khan (Hubilie), Empress Wu Zetian,
Li Qingzhao
You are going to write accounts from two differing ‘first person’
Step 2 perspectives - so you need to choose a form that might be used by
people to put forward their views or personal beliefs.
Choose a
communication Some of the people you choose may not have been literate (couldn’t
form read or write) but we will ignore that for now!
You can choose a form that is relevant to the time period, or one that is
anachronistic (not from the time period).
BE CREATIVE
Examples include:
● Diary entries
● Letters or emails
● Social media pages and posts (e.g. instagram, facebook,
twitter)
● Proclamations or edicts (these might be engraved on a tablet
or on a monument)
● Youtube announcement or video cast (in costume if you like -
go on!)
● Audio announcement or podcast
● Newsletter or editorial in a newspaper
● A speech or announcement
Choose an event from the person’s life that may be contested or
Step 3 debated (this means there may be different views about it)
Choose an event
or events which - it could be a war/conflict, a family issue, a monument they built,
may be contested something they created or came up with. It must include the concept
or debated of CHANGE - something that brought change to the time or society.
BE INTERESTING
It may be a series of events or even a summary of the person’s
life/achievements.
Write a 200 word account about the event/s from Step 3, from the
Step 4 famous person’s perspective.
Describe the The trick here is to use empathy. Try to imagine yourself in that
event/s from your person’s position. What did they do? Why did they do it? What
famous person’s emotions or influences were driving them? Who were they trying to
perspective impress or influence? What was the context of their historical time?
You can use modern language or try to write it in a style more suited
to the time/place.
BE EMPATHETIC
For the word count: think of your format. If it’s social media, maybe
3-4 short posts with photos. If it’s a youtube video, write a script first
and present that with the video and/or add subtitles.
YOU MUST ALSO: refer to how you or the event brought change to
the society.
YOU MUST ALSO: describe your person’s role and/or group they
belong to in society
Now - choose another person from the time who may have seen things
Step 5 differently. This doesn’t have to be a famous person. It could be an
imagined victim or rival or citizen of that society.
Present a Example:
different Personality: Emperor Qin
perspective on Event: Building of Great Wall of China
the event/s Different perspective: a worker on the Great Wall
You can use the same communication form or even try something
different for the response.
YOU MUST ALSO: refer to how the famous person or the event
brought change to the society.
YOU MUST ALSO: describe your person’s role and/or group they
belong to in society
You could also describe here any problems or issues you had with
your research or the assignment in general.
https://www.citethisforme.com/harvard/source-type
These are not compulsory! But they will help you achieve at the
EXTENSION High or Outstanding level. Just choose one of these, not all of them!
OPTIONS
1) Offer a third perspective from another person
These are
optional and for 2) Offer a modern perspective from a person today - could be
students who yourself or someone influenced by the famous ancient person
want an extra
challenge. 3) Create a whole social media conversation between multiple
people - it could be a series of facebook posts or a twitter feed
BE BOLD or similar.
Describe the I have clearly described and I have clearly described and I have directly described at least I have outlined a I have not mentioned
explained in detail the reasons explained the reasons for at least two one change in ancient society, couple of events in my any changes or their
effects of
for multiple changes in ancient changes in ancient society, and a and a few key events in the life of person’s life, and effects
change on society, and a range of key number of key events in the life of my my person, that are mostly mentioned one change
societies, events in the life of my person, person, that are accurate accurate or have implied some I have written fewer
that are accurate general change in than 200 words
individuals and I have made clear statements about I have made some clear society
groups. I have made clear statements how my person made changes to statements about how my person
(7.681) about how my person made society, through their actions or made changes to society, My description is
changes to society, through achievements, with some explanation through their actions or lacking in detail and
Content their actions or achievements, of why they did certain things achievements may contain a number
Knowledge with detailed explanation of why of factual errors.
they did certain things I have explained the response of one I have described the response of
other group to the person and/or one other group to the person
I have explained in detail the change they introduced and/or change they introduced I have briefly outlined
response of one other group to the response of one
the person and/or change they I have written at least 500 words I have written at least 400 words other group to the
introduced person and/or change
they introduced
I have written at least 500
words I have written at least
200 words
Describe I have chosen a number of I have chosen a number of relevant I have chosen relevant event/s I have chosen one or I have not presented
relevant and event/s from the event/s from the time/society from the time/society more events from the any perspectives; or
events and
time/society that illustrate the time but have only only one perspective
developments that is very brief (1-2
complexities of that time I have presented two different I have presented two different provided one
from the sentences)
perspectives of events from the time, perspectives of events from the perspective, or
perspective of I have presented two different, from a relevant famous person and time, from a relevant famous provided only vague or
different sophisticated and nuanced one other person from the time - in person and one other person implied opinions on the
people who perspectives of events from the detail, with clear differences based on from the time events
lived at the time, from a relevant famous the role and status of each individual
person and one other person I have stated a few reasons in
time. (7.682)
from the time - in detail, with I have explained in my rationale why I my rationale for why I chose
Perspectives clear differences based on the chose these particular individuals and these particular individuals and
role and status of each events, with compelling reasons events
individual
Explain the I have selected a relevant I have selected a relevant person who I have selected a relevant person I have selected a I haven’t selected a
person who had an impact on had an impact on their world who had an impact on their world relevant person who relevant person or
role of groups
their world had an impact on their event
and the I have selected a relevant event or I have selected an event or world
significance of I have selected a relevant event events that show their impact on their events that show their impact on I have written a few
or events that clearly show their world their world I have selected a an words that don’t really
particular impact on their world event from their world describe any specific
individuals in I have selected another person from I have selected another person that might not be events or give any
society. I have selected another that society with a different role from that society with a different relevant information about
relevant person from that role groups and roles in
(7.683) society with a different role I have described the group or class of I may have selected that society
Analysis society that each person came from I have mentioned the group or another person from
I have described the group or and described the roles they had class of society that each person that society with a
class of society that each came from and one or two roles different role
person came from and I have explained, with evidence, some they had
explained how their roles and of the achievements or significance of I haven’t made
responsibilities determined my person and also described I have described, with some reference to their roles
some of their actions complexities through the perspective evidence, some of the or the group they came
of my second person achievements or significance of from
I have clearly explained, with my person but could have given
evidence, their achievements more analysis of how and why I have mentioned one
and significance and also they changed their world or two of their
explained complexities through achievements but
the perspective of my second haven’t described this
person in detail or provided
any evidence
Develop texts, My written answers: My written answers: My written answers: My written answers: My written answers:
particularly
Are in full, complex sentences Are in full, complex sentences or short Are in full sentences Are in short sentences Consist of a few words
descriptions paragraphs or dot points
and Use sophisticated language Are appropriate to the Contain many errors in
and literary techniques Use language and literary techniques communication form I’ve used Might not be terms of grammar,
explanations. appropriate to the appropriate to the communication appropriate for the spelling and
(7.690) communication form I’ve used form I’ve used Are mostly correct in terms of communication form punctuation
Commununic grammar, spelling and I’ve used
ation Show a sophisticated and Show a sophisticated command of punctuation List one or two key
confident command of grammar, spelling and punctuation Contain many errors in points
grammar, spelling and Mostly describe events without terms of grammar,
punctuation Offer explanations and analysis of offering detailed explanation or spelling and Contain inaccuracies,
historical events analysis punctuation generalisations or rely
Offer complex analysis of on very insufficient
historical events Are detailed, and accurate and use Are mostly accurate and use Mostly outline events evidence
strong evidence to support my evidence to support most without offering
Are detailed, and accurate and assertions assertions detailed description or show that I am able to
use strong evidence to support explanation recount one or two
my assertions My empathy task: My empathy task: ideas or images related
Contain inaccuracies, to the topic
My empathy task: Shows that I have a deep Shows that I have understood generalisations or rely
understanding of the topic and am the topic and am able to describe on insufficient evidence
Shows that I have a deep able to explain the key the key events/features of that
understanding of the topic and events/features of that topic topic show that I have
am able to explain and analyse understood a few
the key events/features and points about the topic
complications of that topic and am able to
describe those points
at a superficial level
Uses historical I have used a diverse and I have used a diverse range of I have used a small range of I have used a few I haven’t really used
terms and complex range of historical historical terms and concepts relevant relevant terms and concepts simple terms relevant any historical terms
terms and concepts relevant to to my topic. relevant to my topic. to my topic. and concepts.
concepts,
my topic.
incorporating I have integrated detailed information I have incorporated information I have given general I haven’t incorporated
relevant I have integrated detailed and from a range of sources into my from sources into most sections historical information relevant sources.
sources, and complex information from a assignment of the assignment. that may not have
acknowledging range of sources into my come from specific I haven’t
assignment I have referenced at least 3 relevant I have referenced at least 3 sources acknowledged any
sources of sources, in correct Harvard style sources, in mostly correct sources of information.
information, I have referenced at least 3 Harvard style I have referenced
when developing relevant and reputable fewer than 3 sources
texts and sources, in correct Harvard or incorrectly
organising and style referenced my sources
(i.e. not in recognisable
presenting Harvard style)
findings. (7.691)
Academic
Integrity