Clock Drawing Test
Clock Drawing Test
82
object recognition involves integrating visual perception with previous knowledge of known
objects. Spatial ability, on the other hand, involves the integration of visual scanning of
space, mental representation of the relative position of one’s body parts in space, ability to
perform the necessary movements for a task, and understanding of the topographical
environment . Visual-spatial ability is an area typically measured as part of
neuropsychological examinations and may include the assessment of perceptual skills,
constructional skills, and spatial awareness.
83
the ability to use and understand language. A less common form of FTD affects movement,
causing symptoms similar to Parkinson disease or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Another Disorder that has a severe effect on an individual’s Visual spatial ability is
Constructional Apraxia. Constructional apraxia refers to the inability of patients to copy
accurately drawings or three-dimensional constructions. It is a common disorder after right
parietal stroke, often persisting after initial problems such as visuospatial neglect have
resolved. A key deficit in constructional apraxia patients is the inability to correctly copy or
draw an image. There are qualitative differences between patients with left hemisphere
damage, right hemisphere damage, and Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's disease patients
with constructional apraxia have unique symptoms. Their drawings contain fewer angles,
spatial alterations, a lack of perspective and simplifications, which are uncharacteristic of left
hemisphere or right hemisphere patients. Constructional apraxia cannot be localized to a
specific hemisphere or cerebral area because drawing and constructional tasks require both
perceptual and motor functioning. It has been linked to parietal lesions in the left and right
hemisphere, stroke and Alzheimer's disease. Initially, researchers tried to isolate the cause to
left hemisphere lesions in the parietal lobe because of its similarities to Gerstmann syndrome;
however, lesions in the dorsal stream also result in visual agnosia and a piecemeal drawing.
84
Although constructional apraxia can result from lesions in any part of the brain, it is most
commonly associated with lesions in the parietal-occipital lobes. Constructional apraxia is
common after right parietal stroke and it continues after visuospatial symptoms have
subsided. Patients with posterior and parietal lobe lesions tend to have the most severe
symptoms.
The visual special deficits of people suffering from constructional apraxia can be studied with
the help of Simple Clock Drawing Test. Such drawings can be usually classified as bizarre
clocks, major spacing abnormality and minor spacing abnormality.
bizarre clocks: These range from a few uninterpretable squiggles to perseverative use of
numbers all around the perimeter. Some patients could not apply themselves well enough to
make any mark at all
major spacing abnormality: These clocks contain all the correct numbers but are spaced very
poorly. All 12 numbers may be bunched around one side of the clock and if the bunching
finishes with the 11 (or 12 if start before the 9 o'clock) horizontal, a major spacing
abnormality is present. There may be several bunches of numbers. One number may be
omitted or an extra number (usually a second 12) may be added. Multiple number omissions
or additions belong to Class 1.
minor spacing abnormality: The numbers are correct but spacing is slightly abnormal. If the
numbers finish above the 9 o'clock horizontal it is included here When a more major spacing
abnormality is recognized spontaneously (usually at the 3 or 6 location) and corrected
normally for the remainder of the clock, or when there are single number errors with normal
spacing, they are included here.
85
The common Clock drawings produced by patients suffering from Constructional
Apraxia
86
Introduction to the Test
The clock test is used for screening for cognitive impairment and dementia and as a
measure of spatial dysfunction and neglect. It was originally used to assess visuo-constructive
abilities but we know that abnormal drawing occurs in other cognitive impairment. Doing the
test requires verbal understanding, memory and spatial coded knowledge in addition to
constructive skill. Education, age and mood of the individual can influence the test results.
The subjects of low education, advanced age and depression perform more poorly. Visuo-
spatial deficits are a common and early sign of dementia and a clock drawing test is
suggested as a screening tool for dementia.
CDT is correlated with MMSE results in patients with various kinds of cognitive
dysfunction and elderly medical and surgical patients. Constructional apraxia may occur with
lesions in the left parietal lobe and more frequently with the right parietal lobe. It can also be
observed early in times of Alzheimer’s disease. The Clock drawing test correlated strongly
with the test of constructional apraxia and to global deterioration scale. CDT has become one
of the most commonly used cognitive screening instruments because this is an instrument
following characteristics: quick administration, acceptable to the patients, easy to score,
relatively independent of culture, language and religion (Spoken/written instruction nor a
patient who cannot write.).
Good inter score rate and test- retest reliability, there are high levels of sensitivity and
specificity. Correlation with measures of severity and other dementia measuring score with
high predictable validity. Also test a wide range of cognitive skills including comprehension,
visual memory, planning reconstruction, visual spatial motor programming execution,
numerical knowledge, abstract thinking, and inhibition of full by perceptual features,
concentration and frustration.
87
understand the task. It should not be used in patients who cannot understand spoken or
written instruction nor with the patients who cannot write.
METHOD
Aim
To assess the cognitive impairment and spatial dysfunction of the participants using the clock
drawing test.
Participant Details
Name –PM
Age -69
Gender - Female
Materials Required
Writing materials
Manual
Administration
Seat the participant comfortably and establish the rapport and the following
administrations are given: The subject is presented with a circle counter that is around 8.5 x
11 inch, sheet of paper number with instruction to “draw the hours of the clock, after putting
all the numbers. Place the hands of the clock to represent the time ‘forty-five minutes past 10
‘o’ clock’.
Precautions
Consider the physical environment including any issues with muscles in the hand or
arm or with respect to vision.
Remove or lower the clock in the room or be aware about whether the participant has
brought a wrist watch.
88
Scoring and Interpretation
There are a number of scoring systems used in the literature but no one scoring system shows
superior predictive validity. Much is gained by observation of the task, and scoring is
descriptive. The main aspects to consider are:
(i) correct spacing with even spaces between numbers and correct placement of
12,3,6, and 9
(ii) correct placement of hands (e.g.10 past 11) (Brodaty et al, 2002).
Clock phase is divided into quadrants, the number of digits in each quadrant is counted. If
a digit falls on the reference line, then it is counted in that quadrant. Each point for the
number and a point of one of correct representation for the hour and minute.
A prior criterion for evaluating clock drawings (Sunderland et al. 1989)Cut off score = 5 or
less indicates impairment.
(10 – 6) Drawing of clock face with number and circle generally intact
6 - Inappropriate use of clock hands (i.e. use of digital display or circling numbers despite
repeated instructions).
5 - Crowding of numbers at one end of the clock or reversal of numbers. Hands may still be
present in some fashion.
4 - Further distortion of number sequence. Integrity of clock face is now gone (i.e. numbers
missing or placed outside of boundaries of the clock face).
89
3 - Numbers and clock face no longer obviously connected in the clock drawing. Hands are
not present.
2 - Drawing reveals some evidence of instructions being received but only vague
representation of a clock.
RESULT
Table1 shows the Raw score obtained by examinee and its interpretation obtained by the
subject
Score Interpretation
10 Drawing of clock face with number and
circle generally intact. Hands in correct
position, no errors in placement of hands.
Since there are no errors in the drawing of clock without any difficulties and errors the
subject has scored 10 in Clock design Test.
DISCUSSION
The aim of the test was to assess the cognitive impairment and spatial dysfunction of the
participants using the clock drawing test. Name of the subject was PA. She is a 69-year-old
house wife. Subject has completed high school education. The subject was well groomed,
cooperative and articulated herself clearly, and she has no history of mental or physical
illness.
The subject has scored high on the clock drawing test, by drawing of
clock face with number and circle generally intact, Hands in correct position and no errors in
90
placement of hands. This might primarily indicate that the subject is not suffering from brain
this test also reveals that the subjects visual spacial ability remains intact. Doing the Clock
drawing test also requires verbal understanding, memory and spatial coded knowledge in
addition to constructive skill. Since the subject produced clock design as instructed to her, we
can also assume that the subject might not have deficits in the above-mentioned domains as
well. The subject also successfully completed the task in less than two minutes. The subject
CONCLUSION: The subject showed absence of special dysfunction in the clock drawing
test.
REFERENCES
Sunderland, T., Hill, J.L., Mellow, A.M., Lawlor, B.A., Gundersheimer, J., Newhouse, P.A.,
& Grafman, J.H. (1989). Clock drawing in Alzheimer’s disease: a novel measure of
dementia severity. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society , 37, 725- 729.
Brodaty H, Pond D, Kemp NM, et al. (2002). The GPCOG: A new screening test for
dementia designed for general practice. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,
50(3), 530-534.
Mather, N., & Wendling, B. J. (2005). Linking cognitive assessment results to academic
91
Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues
Sattler, J. M., & Hoge, R. D. (2006). Assessment of children: Behavioral, social, and clinical
Pal A, Biswas A, Pandit A.(2016). Study of visuospatial skill in patients with dementia. Ann
Russell, C., Deidda, C., Malhotra, P., Crinion, J. T., Merola, S., & Husain, M. (2010). A
https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq052
92