Phase Contrast Micros PDF
Phase Contrast Micros PDF
Microscopy
Introduction
Light microscopy offers a powerful technique for label-free imaging of biological samples such
as cells. Label-free imaging is particularly well-placed for understanding more about cells as
they are free of any modifications that could potentially alter structure, function or behavior.
However, standard light microscopy suffers from limitations of low contrast, as most native
biological samples don’t absorb light (cells essentially being tiny transparent bags of water).
Changes in the refractive index that scatter light can also reveal structure, but differences
between the refractive index of cells, sub-cellular structures, and their surrounding matrix are
often low or negligible. This leads to the low levels of contrast inherent to transparent specimens
which limits light microscopy and other label-free techniques as research applications.
There are several imaging methods that generate contrast in these samples. One such method
is phase-contrast microscopy. This optical technique converts differences in the optical
pathlength or refractive index of the sample into shifts in the phase of light and uses these phase
shifts to create contrast. Using subtle modifications of the regular brightfield optical path, phase
contrast permits visualization of details such as intracellular organelles, in these otherwise
featureless, unlabeled samples.
This article will introduce light phase and the mechanism of phase-contrast microscopy. Setting
up the microscope to perform phase contrast imaging will be discussed as well as some of
the applications and associated advantages and limitations.
The phase of a wave at a given point in space or time refers to where along the sine wave the
wave is at that particular point, i.e. is the wave at a peak, a trough, or somewhere in between?
For example, two seagulls floating on the sea may be at different heights –
the wavelength and maximum amplitude of the waves are the same in both cases, but the phase is
different. Mathematically, we define phase in degrees or radians, relative to some reference point
along the sine wave– for example, we could define the peak of the wave where the is seagull at
its highest as 0°. The lowest point would then be at 180° (π radians), and the transition point
between the two would be 90° (π/2 radians). The phase difference between the red and blue
waves in Fig.1 is 90°.
Light waves can interfere with each other if they have the same frequency and well-
ordered phases, with the result dependant upon the phase difference between waves. For
example, waves that have the same frequency and are perfectly out of phase (180° phase
difference) would align peak to trough, leading to destructive interference and resulting in 0
amplitude, the two waves perfectly canceling each other out. Likewise, waves that are
perfectly in-phase align peak to peak (0° phase difference) and thus would constructively
interfere, combining the intensities into a wave with double the amplitude.
If two waves with the same wavelength start from the same point and take different paths before
reaching the same point, there will likely be a difference in OPL. Unless this difference is a
precise multiple of the wavelength, there will be then a difference in phase between the two
waves. This means that phase differences in light from the same sample can be introduced by
forcing some of the light to travel further. This is the concept behind phase-contrast.
Phase-Contrast Microscopy
Phase-contrast microscopy was first described by Dutch physicist Frits Zernike in the 1930s, for
which he later was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics (1953). Phase contrast is a technique that
exploits the ability of some microscope samples to alter the OPL of light passing through
it, adding contrast through the interference of light of different phases.
Transparent unstained samples (such as cells) do not absorb light and are called phase objects.
When light passes through a sample area with no phase object, there is no significant change in
the RI or OPL, so no significant diffraction occurs (Fig.2). This light that is not diffracted is
often referred to as direct or zero-order light as it continues unmodified through the sample.
On the other hand, when light passes through an area of the sample with a phase object (such as
cellular structures), small changes in the RI will diffract and scatter some light and cause changes
to the OPL, depending on the thickness and RI of each structure. The thicker the structure, the
greater the diffraction of the light.
The diffracted light is a small proportion of the total light that has passed through the sample.
This diffracted light (that passed through a phase object) arrives at the detector out of phase with
the direct light (that did not pass through a phase object). This small phase shift is not enough to
cause significant interference between direct and diffracted light, which along with the poor
absorption of transparent structures means there is little amplitude difference between areas
where such structures are present and where they are not.
It was known that constraining light through a small pinhole generated an expanding light wave
with well-organized phase but at the expense of a great loss of intensity. This circular wave was
easily converted to a flat wave with a lens. Phase-contrast compromises between light intensity
and uniform phase by using a circular ring (annulus) of illumination. This annulus acted
similarly to a ring of pinholes, with any particular direction around the ring having the same
phase, even though the phase would vary irregularly around the ring.
To phase shift either the scattered or direct light, a phase-shifting optic (like a glass disk) is
placed in the light path where it would predominantly affect the direct light. In Fig.3, a well-
ordered light plane starts on the left. As the light hits the sample the phase and direction of
the diffracted (solid lines to the right of the sample) and direct (dashed lines) light changes.
The objective lens takes the scattered light and focuses it to ordered waves, while the direct light
is focused to the optical center, where the phase-shifting material is placed. This brings the
scattered light and direct light back into phase, allowing for the generation of contrast through
interference upon arrival at the detector.
Figure 3: The light paths followed by scattered light (dark solid lines) are different from direct
light (dotted lines) through an infinity-corrected imaging system. Placement of the phase shift
plate at the back focal plane of the objective acts predominantly to shift the phase of the direct
light only.
Light passing through the sample is refracted or diffracted due to features with different
refractive indices, creating new optical paths. Almost all of these new optical paths will not pass
through the attenuating areas of the phase plate but instead will pass through the non-attenuating
center of the phase ring.
The wavefronts that are diffracted to varying degrees by passing through the specimen become
superimposed over the shifted direct wavefronts in the intermediate image plane. With the 90°
shift taken into account, the total phase difference is either close to 1 for a positive shift, leading
to destructive interference, or to 0 for a negative shift, leading to constructive interference. Small
changes in RI, therefore, lead to large changes in interference.
This leads to objects with a higher RI than their surroundings appearing dark on a bright
background, or bright on a dark background depending on whether the technique
is positive and negative phase contrast respectively. Positive phase contrast is the standard in
modern microscopes, where the darkness of the object features increases with their refractive
index, which simulates the effect of absorption to a viewer’s eyes.
As objective numerical aperture and magnification increase, the phase plate width and diameter
both decrease. Conversely, as magnification increases, the condenser annulus size increases.
Thus, in order to achieve high-quality phase-contrast images, the correct phase plate and
condenser annulus pair must be used and the condenser annulus must be properly centered such
that the image of the annulus corresponds exactly with the position of the phase ring. Examples
of these phase rings and the resulting image, when compared to non-phase techniques such as
brightfield, can be seen in Fig.5.
Figure 5: Phase contrast microscopy. The top image shows a microscope slider with two phase-
contrast rings and one brightfield glass disc. Different rings are used for different magnifications,
the leftmost circle is for 4x magnification and the center for 10x, 20x and 40x. The bottom image
compares brightfield (top row) and phase-contrast microscopy (bottom row) on the same
transparent biological samples. Phase-contrast images have better contrast and therefore more
information.
Another advantage of phase contrast is the potential to combine it with other techniques, such as
fluorescence microscopy to identify subcellular components through specific labeling.
Combining multiple methodologies provides opportunities to understand greater levels of detail
from a single sample, and provides new opportunities to glean additional information relating to
subcellular structure and function.
Some samples will give rise to stronger contrast when using either positive or negative phase
contrast methods. As an example, human red blood cells lack contrast in positive phase contrast
but have high contrast when using negative phase imaging. Conversely, cancer cells visualized
with negative phase imaging exhibit little contrast, but when viewing with positive phase
contrast, the cell outline as well as internal components, such as organelles, exhibit strong
contrast against the surrounding matrix. Understanding the most appropriate mode for a specific
sample likely depends on the matrix (imaging media, growth media), the sample itself and their
RI differences.
Disadvantages
A constraint of phase contrast is that it does not work well with thick specimens because phase
shifts from areas below or above the focal plane contribute to the image giving rise to out-of-
focus blur. Optical phase artifacts are also common, such as halos and shade-off contrast patterns
which may be present in the images.
The halo effect is described by the appearance of a bright edge for positive phase contrast or a
dark edge for negative phase contrast around large objects which obscure details. Halos form
because small amounts of stray light diffracted light from the specimen can also cross the phase
ring. This is not subject to the same interference in the image plane, which leads to a reversion in
contrast and the appearance of halos at the boundaries of large objects. The haloes will be bright
in positive phase contrast, and dark in negative phase contrast.
Shade-off is another issue present in-phase images. Shade-off refers to the intensity gradient
present at large phase objects, which may be the brightest in the middle, resembling the
surrounding matrix intensity. This will gradually reduce towards the edges of the object. The
reverse is true in negative phase contrast shade-off, where the central area is dark, similar to the
background. This is caused by the complicated relationship between pathlength and intensity,
which is not linear.
Another issue with phase-contrast is contrast inversion. This is caused by the presence of objects
with high RI objects next to objects with a lower RI, which will appear brighter instead of darker
(for positive phase-contrast). This leads to the high refractive index objects appearing bright,
rather than dark (in positive-contrast).
The configuration also has other limitations including the reduction in resolution of the optical
system due to the restriction of the numerical aperture by the phase annuli. This can be restrictive
if the resolution is a critical part of the imaging experiment.
However, the advantages that phase-contrast offers for biomedical and biological
research greatly outweighs the artifacts or limitations of the technique, and the use of phase-
contrast has revolutionized various fields of cell biology.
Summary
Phase-contrast is a technique that can be implemented on a traditional brightfield microscope
with the addition of two components, matching phase plate in the condenser and condenser
annulus, usually in a phase-contrast lens. When correctly configured, phase-contrast offers an
excellent method to visualize otherwise transparent specimens that would be almost invisible on
traditional brightfield imaging.
Phase-contrast has some limitations, such as optical phase artifacts and non-linearity. Overall,
the technique has contributed significantly as an optical imaging method and continues to be of
critical value for a variety of different applications.