COURSE SYLLABUS IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

CUP College of Law

First Semester, 2022-2023

PROS. EUGENE P. KHO

Senior Assistant City Prosecutor, Quezon City Prosecutor’s Office
Master of Laws, University of Santo Tomas
Master of Arts in Philosophy, Ateneo de Manila University

COURSE DESCRIPTION : The course introduces the provisions of the Rules of Court (Rule 110-127). The
discussion shows on how proceedings arise and terminate in courts. The course specifically discusses
the procedure in criminal cases. (3 units)

COURSE OBJECTIVES : It is expected that at the end of the course, the students are:
1. Cognizant of different special penal laws;
2. Understanding of the Philippine legal system and basic court processes;
3. Consider having a good grasp on criminal procedure.

COURSE OUTLINE :
A. General Matters
1. Definition of Criminal Procedure
2. Sources of Criminal Procedure
3. System of Criminal Procedure in the Philippines
4. Distinguish jurisdiction over subject matter from jurisdiction over person of the accused
People v. Chipeco GR No. 1968, March 31, 1964
Binay v. Sandiganbayan GR No. 120011, October 1, 1999
5. Requisites for exercise of criminal jurisdiction
People v. Mariano, GR. No. L-40527, June 30, 1976
Tijam v. Sibonghanoy, G.R. No. L-21450, Apr. 15, 1968
Trenas vs. People, 664 SCRA 355
Lacson vs. Executive Secretary, 301 SCRA 298
People vs. Lagon, 185 SCRA 442
Asistio vs. People, G.R. No. 200465, 20 April 2015*
6. Jurisdiction of criminal courts
Buaya v. Polo, G.R. No. 75097, Jan. 26, 1989
Dela Cruz v. Moya, G.R. No. 65192, Apr. 27, 1988
SC Court Circular No. 09-94
Cuyos v. Garcia, G.R. No. L-46934, Apr. 15, 1988
People v. Eduarte, G.R. No. 88232, Feb. 26, 1990
Morillo vs. People, 777 SCRA 207
Chiok vs. People, 776 SCRA 120*
Laude vs. Ginez-Jabalde, 775 SCRA 408
Atienza vs. People, 716 SCRA 84
Ombudsman vs. Dechavez, 709 SCRA 375
Garcia vs. Executive Secretary, 677 SCRA 751
People vs. Sandiganbayan, 630 SCRA 489*
7. When injunction may be issued to restrain criminal prosecution
Domingo v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No 129904, Mar. 16, 2002

B. Prosecution of Offenses (Rule 110)

1. Criminal actions, how instituted
Zaldivia v. Reyes, Jr., G.R. No. 102342, July 3, 1992
BPI vs. Hontanosas, Jr., G.R. No. 157163, 25 June 2014
Heirs of Delgado vs. Gonzalez, G.R. No. 184337, 07 August 2009, 595 SCRA 501
Lim vs. Mejica, A.C. No. 11121, 13 September 2016

2. Who may file them, crimes that cannot be prosecuted de officio

Philippine Rabbit v. People, 427 SCRA 456
Perez v. Hagonoy Rural Bank, Inc., G.R. No. 126210, Mar. 9, 2000
 People v. Ilarde, G.R. No. L-57288, Apr. 30, 1984
3. Criminal actions, when enjoined
Metropolitan Bank and Trust Co. vs. Veridiano II, 360 SCRA 359
4. Control of prosecution
Republic v. Judge Sunga, G.R. No. 38634, June 20, 1988
5. Sufficiency of complaint or information
People v. Dela Cruz, G.R. No. 128362, Jan. 16,2001
People v. Amodia GR No. 173791
People v. Valdesancho, G.R. No. 137051-52, May 30, 2001
People v. Elpedes, G.R. Nos. 137106-07, Jan. 31, 2001
People vs. Sandiganbayan (Fourth), G.R. No. 160619, 09 September 2015
Zapata vs. People, G.R. No. 170863, 20 March 2013, 694 SCRA 25
People vs. Bali-Balita, G.R. No. 134266, 15 September 2000, 340 SCRA 450
Navaja vs. De Castro, G.R. No. 182926, 22 June 2015
Lee Pue Liong vs. Chua Pue Chin Lee, G.R. No. 181658, 07 August 2013
Senador vs. People, G.R. No. 201620, 06 March 2013
6. Designation of offense
Catiis v. CA, G.R. 153979, February 9, 2006
People vs. Samillano, 56 SCRA 573
People vs. Magdowa, 73 Phil. 512
Buhat vs. Court of Appeals, 265 SCRA 701
U.S. vs. Panlilio, 28 Phil. 603
People vs. Valdez, G.R. No. 175602, 18 January 2012, 663 SCRA 272
People vs. Asilan, G.R. No. 188322, 11 April 2012, 669 SCRA 405
People vs. Bayabos, G.R. Nos. 171222 and 174756, 18 February 2015
7. Cause of the accusation
Lacson v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 128006, Jan. 20, 1999
Crisostomo v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 152398, Apr. 14, 2005
People vs. Sandiganbayan (Fourth), G.R. No. 160619, 09 September 2015
Dungo vs. People, G.R. No. 209464, 01 July 2015
8. Duplicity of the offense; exception
People v. Silva, 4 SCRA 95
Enrile v. Salazar GR NO 92163, June 5, 1990
People vs. Jugueta, G.R. No. 202124, 05 April 2016
Loney vs. People, G.R. No. 152644, 10 February 2006, 482 SCRA 194
People vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 183652, 25 February 2015
9. Amendment or substitution of complaint or information
Almeda v. Villaluz, GR No. L- 31665, August 6, 1975
People v. Montenegro G.R. No. 45772, Mar. 25, 1988
Balindong vs. CA, G.R. Nos. 177600 and 178684, 19 October 2015
Mendez vs. People, G.R. No. 179962, 11 June 2014
Ocampo vs. Abando, G.R. Nos. 176830, 185587, etc., 11 February 2014
Kummer vs. People, G.R. No. 174461, 11 September 2013, 705 SCRA 490
10. Venue of criminal actions
Union Bank vs. People, G.R. No. 192565, 28 February 2012, 667 SCRA 113*
Navaja vs. de Castro, G.R. No. 182926, 22 June 2015
Sto. Tomas vs. Salac, 685 SCRA 245
Yalong vs. People, 704 SCRA 195
11. Intervention of offended party
Villalon vs. Chan, G.R. No. 196508, 24 September 2014
C. Prosecution of Civil Action (Rule 111)
1. Rule on implied institution of civil action with criminal action
Yakult Philippines v. CA, GR No. 91856 October 5, 1990
Chiok vs. People, G.R. Nos. 179814 and 180021, 07 December 2015
Bernardo vs. People, G.R. No. 182210, 05 October 2015
Standard Insurance Co., Inc. vs. Cuaresma, G.R. No. 200055, 10 September 2014
Heirs of Simon vs. Chan, G.R. No. 157547, 23 February 2011
Heirs of Burgos vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 169711, 08 February 2010
Sec. 21(a), A.M. No. 04-2-04-SC, August 16, 2004 (Revision of Rule 141,
Revised Rules of Court Legal Fees)
2. When civil action may proceed independently
DMPI Employees Credit Cooperative v. Velez, G.R. No. 129282, Nov. 29, 2001
Lim vs. Kou Co Ping, G.R. Nos. 175256 and 179160, 23 August 2012
Casupanan vs. Laroya, G.R. No. 145391, 26 August 2002
Cabuago vs. People, G.R. Nos. 163879 and 165805, 30 July 2014
3. When separate civil action is suspended
Co vs. Muñoz, Jr., G.R. No. 181986, 04 December 2013
Domingo vs. Colina, G.R. No. 173330, 17 June 2013
Ching vs. Nicdao, G.R. No. 141181, 27 April 2007
4. Effect of the death of accused or convict on civil action
People vs. Lipata, G.R. No. 200302, 20 April 2016
Cabugao vs. People, Supra.
Asilo, Jr. vs. People, G.R. Nos. 159017-18 and 159059, 09 March 2011
People vs. Bayot, G.R. No. 200030, 18 April 2012
5. Prejudicial question
Apa v. Fernandez, G.R. No. 112318, Mar. 20, 1995
People v. Delizo, G.R. No. 141624, Aug. 17, 2004
Tuanda v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 110544, Oct. 17, 1995
Ramirez v. Jimenez, 1 CA rep. 143 (Herrera, Vol. IV, p. 270, 2007 ed.)
Beltran v. People, G.R. No. 137567, June 26, 2000
Ty-de Zuzuarregui vs. Villarosa, et al., G.R. No. 183788, 05 April 2010
People vs. Arambulo, Jr., G.R. No. 186597, 17 June 2015
San Miguel Properties, Inc. v. Perez, G.R. No. 166836, 04 September 2013
Spouses Gabitano vs. San Miguel Corp., G.R. No. 188767, 24 July 2013
Pimentel vs. Pimentel, G.R. No. 172060, 13 September 2010
Dreamwork Construction, Inc. vs. Janiola, G.R. No. 184861, 30 June 2009
6. Rule on filing fees in civil action deemed instituted with the criminal action
People v. Villanueva, G.R. 
No. 96469, Oct. 21, 1992 

People v. Teehankee, Jr., 
G.R. Nos. 111206-08, Oct. 6, 1995 

Roa v. Dela Cruz, G.R. No. L- 13134, Feb. 13, 1960

D. Preliminary Investigation (Rule 112)

AM 05- 8-26-SC, October 3, 2005
Ledesma v. CA, G.R. 161629, July 29, 2005
People v. Basilla, G.R. No. 83938-40, Nov. 6, 1989
Mendoza vs. People, G.R. No. 197293, 21 April 2014
Callo-Claridad vs. Esteban, G.R. No. 191567, 20 March 2013
Uy vs. Javellana, A.M. No. MTJ-07-1666, 05 September 2012
Arroyo vs. Department of Justice, et al., G.R. Nos. 199082, 199085 and 199118,
18 September 2012
1. Nature of right
P/Supt. Cruz v. Judge Areola, A.M. No. RTJ-01-1642, March 6, 2002
People v. De Asis, G.R. No. 105581, Dec. 7, 1993
US v. Marfori, G.R. No. 10905, Dec. 9, 1916
People v. Gomez, G.R. No. L-29590, Sept. 30, 1982
People v. De Asis, G.R. No. 105581, Dec. 7, 1993
 People v. Bulosan, G.R. No. 58404, Apr. 15, 1988
Pilapil v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 101978, Apr. 7, 1993
Larranaga v. CA, G.R. No. 130644, Mar. 13, 1998
Go v. CA, G.R. No. 101837, Feb. 11, 1992
Bautista vs. CA, 330 SCRA 618
Santos vs. Bernardo, 559 SCRA 310
Estrada vs. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 212140-40, 21 January 2015*
2. Purposes of preliminary investigation
Ong v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 126858, Sept. 26, 2005
People v. De Asis, G.R. No. 105581, Dec. 7, 1993
Larranaga v. CA, G.R. No. 130644, Mar. 13, 1998 

3. Who may conduct determination of existence of probable cause
Mangila vs. Pangilinan, G.R. No. 160739, 17 July 2013
Yambot vs. Armivit, 565 SCRA 177
Honasan II vs. The Panel of Investigating Prosecutors of the DOJ, 427 SCRA 46
Alawiya vs. Datumanong, 585 SCRA 267
A.M. No. 05-8-26-SC (Amendment of Rules 112 and 114 of the Revised Rules on
Criminal Procedure by Removing the Conduct of Preliminary Investigation from
Judges of the First Level Courts)
4. Resolution of investigation prosecutor
Villaflor v. Vivar, G.R. No. 
134744, Jan. 16, 2001
Sy Lim v. CA, G. R. No. L-37494, Mar. 30,1982
Orquinaza v. People, G.R. No. 165596, Nov. 15, 2005 

Tetangco vs. Ombudsman, 479 SCRA 249
Alawiya vs. Datumanong, Supra.
Ledesma vs. CA, 278 SCRA 656
Estrada vs. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. Nos. 212140-41, 21 January 2015
Ocampo vs. Abando, Supra.
Callo-Claridad vs. Esteban, Supra.
Artillero vs. Casimero, G.R. No. 190569, 24 April 2012
Soriano vs. Casanova, 486 SCRA 431
Ladlad vs. Velasco, 523 SCRA 318*
Sections 32 and 33, R.A. No. 9344 (Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006)
A.M. No. 02-1-18-SC (Revised Rule on Children in Conflict with the Law)
5. Review
Community Rural Bank of Guimba v. Talavera, A.M. No. RTJ-05-1909, Apr. 6, 2005
Ching v. Sec. Of Justice, G.R. No. 164317, Feb. 6, 2006
De Ocampo v. Sec. Of Justice, G.R. No. 147392, Jan. 25, 2006
Ramiscal v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 109727-28, Aug. 18, 2006
Mendoza-Arce v. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 149148, Apr. 5, 2002
Tejano v. Ombudsman, G.R. No. 159190, June 30, 2005
Social Security System v. DOJ, G.R. No. 158131, Aug. 8, 2007
Quisay vs. People, G.R. No. 216920, 13 January 2016
De Lima vs. Reyes, G.R. No. 209330, 11 January 2016
Estrada vs. Office of the Ombudsman, Supra.
Tolentino vs. Paqueo, Jr., 523 SCRA 377*
Asetre vs. Asetre, 584 SCRA 471
Guy vs. Asia United Bank, 534 SCRA 7
DOJ Circular No. 70, 03 July 2000 (2000 NPS Rule on Appeal)
DOJ Circular No. 70-A, 10 July 2000 (Delegation of Authority to Regional Prosecutors to
Resolve Appeals in Certain Cases)
DOJ Circular No. 3, 13 January 2016 (Automatic Review of Dismissed Cases Involving R.A. No. 9165)
Mangila vs. Pangilinan, Supra.
6. When warrant of arrest may issue
Pestillos vs. Generoso, G.R. No. 182601, 10 November 2014
Hao v. People, G.R. No. 183345, 17 September 2014
Mendoza v. People, Supra.
Marcos vs. Cabrera-Faller, A.M. No. RTJ-16-2427, 24 January 2017
Soliven vs. Makasiar, 167 SCRA 393
Ribaya vs. Binamira-Parcia, 456 SCRA 107
7. Cases not requiring a preliminary investigation
8. Remedies of accused if there was no preliminary investigation
US v. Banzuela, GR No. 10172,1915
Conde v. CFI, GR No. L-21236, October 1, 1923
Ladlad vs. Velasco, G.R. Nos. 172070-72, 172074-76, 175013, 01 June 2007
De Castro vs. Fernandez, Jr., G.R. No. 155041, 14 February 2007
R.A. No. 7438 (An Act Defining Certain Rights of Persons Arrested, Detained or Under Custodial
Investigation as well as the Duties of the Arresting, Detaining and Investigating Officers and
Providing Penalties for Violations Thereof)
DOJ Circular No. 61 (Inquest Procedures)
9. Records
People vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R No. 144159, 29 September 2004
Okabe vs. Gutierrez, G.R. No. 150185, 27 May 2004
People vs. Grey, et al., G.R. No. 180109, 26 July 2010
10.Cases Not Requiring Preliminary Investigation nor Covered by the Rule on Summary Procedure
Victorias Milling Co., Inc. vs. Padilla, G.R. No. 156963, 06 October 2008
Borlongan, Jr. vs. Pena, 538 SCRA 221
Tabujara vs. People, 570 SCRA 229
Sangguniang Bayan of Batac vs. Albano, 260 SCRA 561
11. Other Cases
Reyes vs. Ombudsman, 15 March 2016
Young vs. People, 783 SCRA 286
Forteleza vs. Gonzalez, 782 SCRA 504
Quisay vs. Reyes, 779 SCRA 98*
De Lima vs. Reyes, 779 SCRA 1*
Marasigan vs. Fuentes, 778 SCRA 645
12. Inquest Proceedings

E. Arrest (Rule 113)

1. Arrest, how made
People v. Jalosjos, G.R. No. 132875-76, Feb. 3, 2000
People v. Inting,G.R. No. 85866, July 24, 1990
Sanchez vs. People, G.R. No. 204589, 19 November 2014
Homar vs. People, G.R. No. 182534, 02 September 2015
Luz vs. People, G.R. No. 197788, 29 February 2012, 667 SCRA 421*
People vs. Cunanan, G.R. No. 198024, 16 March 2015
Sanchez vs. Demetriou, 227 SCRA 627
Babst vs. National Intelligence Board, 264 SCRA 316
2. Arrest without warrant, when lawful
People v. Gerente, 219 SCRA 756
People v. Manlulu, 231 SCRA 701
People v. Del Rosario, 305 SCRA 740
People v. Kimura, 428 SCRA 51 

Homar vs. People, Supra.
People vs. Breis, G.R. No. 205823, 17 August 2015
Comerciante vs. People, G.R. No. 205926, 22 July 2015
In Re: Salibo vs. Warden, G.R. No. 197597, 08 April 2015
Pestillos vs. Generoso, Supra.
People vs. Nepomoceno, 750 SCRA 209
Valdez vs. People, 538 SCRA 611
People vs. Doria, 301 SCRA 668
 Posadas vs. Ombudsman, 341 SCRA 388
People vs. Villareal, 693 SCRA 549
Ladlad vs. Velasco, 523 SCRA 318*
People vs. Ereno, 326 SCRA 157
3. Method of arrest
Soria vs. Desierto, G.R. Nos. 153524-25, 31 January 2005, 450 SCRA 339*
Sayo vs. Chief of Police of Manila, 80 Phil. 859
People vs. Sapal, 328 SCRA 417
R.A. No. 9344, Supra.
A.M. No. 02-1-18-SC, Supra.
a) By officer with warrant
b) By officer without warrant
c) By private person
Dimatulac v. Villon, G.R. No. 127107, Oct. 12, 1998).
People v. Suzuki, G.R. No. 120670, Oct. 23, 2003
People v. Macam, G.R. Nos. L-91011-12, Nov. 24,1994
People v. Ejandra, G.R. No. 134203, May 27, 2004
People v. Cabiles, G.R. No. 112035, Jan. 16, 1998
4. Requisites of a valid warrant of arrest
Soliven v. Makasiar GR No L-82585,November 14, 1988
People v. Inting,G.R. No. 85866, July 24, 1990
Manangan v. CFI GR No 82760 August 30,1990
Alimpoos v. Court of Appeals, GR No L-27331, July 30, 1981
People vs. Givera, G.R. No. 132159, 18 January 2001
Colorado vs. Agapito, A.M. No. MTJ-06-1658, 03 July 2007
Mallari vs. CA, G.R. No. 110569, 09 December 1996
People vs. Tan, G.R. Nos. 116200-02, 21 June 2001
People vs. Castiller, G.R. No. 87783, 06 August 1990
People vs. Dele Cruz, G.R. No. 205414, 04 April 2016
Saraum vs. People, G.R. No. 205472, 25 January 2016
People vs. Lugnasin, 785 SCRA 120
Palo vs. People, 783 SCRA 557
5. Determination of probable cause for issuance of warrant of arrest
6. Distinguish probable cause of fiscal from that of a judge
People vs. CA, 301 SCRA 475
P/Supt. Cruz v. Judge Areola, A.M. No. RTJ-01-1642, March 6, 2002

F. Bail (Rule 114)

1. Nature
Paderanga v. Court of Appeals, 247 ACRS 741
Ocampo v. Bernabe, 77 Phil. 55
Almeda v. Villaluz GR No L- 31665, August 6, 1975
Dinapol v. Baldado AM No 92- 898, August 5, 1993
Lavides v. Court of Appeals GR No. 129670, February 1, 2000
Serapio v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 148468, 148769 & 149116, Jan. 28, 2003
Baylon v. Sison, A.M. No. 92-7-360-0, Apr. 6, 1995
Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 213847, 12 July 2016*
Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 213847, 18 August 2015*
Miranda vs. Tuliao, 486 SCRA 377
Allado vs. Diokno, 232 SCRA 192
Roberts vs. CA, 254 SCRA 307
Lacson vs. ES, 301 SCRA 298
Pico vs. Combong, Jr., 215 SCRA 421
Pantillo III vs. Canoy, A.M. No. RTJ-11-2262, 09 February 2011
Crisostomo vs. Sandiganbayan, 456 SCRA 45
Lavides vs. CA, 324 SCRA 321
Ambil, Jr. vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 175457 and 175482, 06 July 2011
2. When a matter of right; exceptions
 Sy Guan v. Amparo, G.R. No. L-1771, Dec. 4, 1947
Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan, Supra.*
Tolentino vs. Camano, Jr., 322 SCRA 559
Go vs. CA, 206 SCRA 138
Government of US vs. Puruganan, 389 SCRA 623
Government of Hong Kong vs. Olalia, 521 SCRA 470
A.M. No. 02-1-18-SC, Supra.
3. When a matter of discretion
A.M. No. 02-1-18-SC 

Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region v. Olalia, G.R. No. 153675, Apr. 19, 2007
Sec. 34, R.A. 9344, Juvenile and Justice Act of 2006
Leviste v. CA, GR No. 189122, March 17, 2010
Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan, Supra.*
Qui vs. People, G.R. No. 196161, 26 September 2012, 682 SCRA 94*
Leviste vs. Court of Appeals and People, G.R. No. 189122, 17 March 2010,
615 RA 619*
Obosa vs. CA, 266 SCRA 281
Alva vs. CA, 487 SCRA 146
Chua vs. CA, 520 SCRA 729
People vs. Fitzgerald, 505 SCRA 573
4. Hearing of application for bail in capital offenses
5. Guidelines in fixing amount of bail
6. Bail when not required
7. Increase or reduction of bail
Sy Guan v. Amparo, 79 Phil 670
8. Forfeiture and cancellation of bail
9. Application not a bar to objections in illegal arrest, lack of or irregular preliminary investigation
10. Hold departure order & bureau of immigration watch list
DOJ Department Order No. 17
Silverio v. Court of Appeals GR No. 94284, April 8, 1991
SC Circular 39-97, June 19, 1997
A.M. No. 99-9-141- MTCC November 25, 1999
A.M. No. 02-11-12-SC
DOJ Department Order No. 41
Santiago v. Vasquez, G.R. No. 99289-90, January 27, 1993
11.Capital Offense
Trillanes, Jr. vs. Pimentel, 556 SCRA 471
Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan, 767 SCRA 282*
R.A. No. 9346 (An Act Prohibiting the Death Penalty)
12. Capital Offense or an Offense Punishable by Reclusion Perpetua of Life Imprisonment, not Bailable
People vs. Valdez, G.R. Nos. 216007-09, 08 December 2015
Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan, Supra.*
13. Burden of Proof in Bail Application
Gacad vs. Clapis, Jr., A.M. No. RTJ-10-2257, 17 July 2012
14.Amount of Bail Guidelines
Tanog vs. Balindong, G.R. No. 187464, 25 November 2015
The 2000 Bail Bond Guide
DOJ Circular No. 20, 30 March 2015 (Guidelines on Bail for R.A. No. 10175 or
Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012
DOJ Circular No. 48, 02 December 2015 (Guidelines on Recommending Bail for Foreign
Nationals in Violation of Republic Act No. 9165)
15. Property Bond, How Posted
Re: Report on the Judicial Audit Conducted in the RTC, Branch 4, Dolores, Eastern Samar,
A.M. No. 06-6-340-RTC, 17 October 2007
16.Deposit of Cash as Bail
Pantillo III vs. Canoy, Supra.
Lachica vs. Tormis, A.M. No. MTJ-05-1609, 20 September 2005
17.Recognizance
 OCA vs. Floro, Jr., A.M. No. RTJ-99-7-273-RTC, RTJ-06-1988, 31 March 2006
Adalim-White vs. Bugtas, A.M. No. RTJ-02-1738, 17 November 2005
18.Bail, When Not Required; Reduced Bail or Recognizance
Adalim-White vs. Bugtas, Id.
R.A. No. 6036 (Cases when Bail not Required)
19.Bail, Where Filed
Pantillo III vs. Canoy, Supra.
Re: Anonymous Letter-Complaint Against Marilou Runes-Tamang, A.M. No. MTJ-04-
1558, 07 April 2010
A.M. No. 05-8-26-SC, Supra.
20.Notice of Application to Prosecutor
Torrevillas vs. Navidad, A.M. No. RTJ-06-1976 and A.M. No. RTJ-06-1977, 29 April 2009
21.Release on Bail
Re: Report on the Judicial Audit Conducted in the RTC, Branch 4, Dolores, Eastern
Samar, Supra.
22.Increase or Reduction of Bail
Conquilla vs. Bernardo, A.M. No. MTJ-09-1737, 09 February 2011
23.Forfeiture of Bail
Re: Josefina D. Farrales, A.M. Nos. 06-3-196-RTC and A.M. No. 06-7-416-RTC, 24 December 2008
Mendoza vs. Alarma, G.R. No. 151970, 07 May 2008
24.Cancellation of Bail
Bongcac vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 156687-88, 21 May 2009
People vs. Cawaling, G.R. No. 157147, 17 April 2009
25.Arrest of Accused Out on Bail
Silverio vs. CA, G.R. No. 94284, 08 April 1991
26.No Bail After Final Judgment; Exception
Adalim-White vs. Bugtas, Supra.
Vicente vs. Majaducon, A.M. No. RTJ-02-1968, 23 June 2005

G. Rights of the Accused (Rule 115)

1. Rights of accused at the trial
People v. Mingoa, G.R. No. L-5371, Mar. 26, 1953
Beltran v. Samson G.R. No. 32025, Sept. 23, 1929
People v. Honrada, G.R. Nos. 112178-79, Apr. 21, 1995
Gandicela v. Lutero, G.R. No. L-4069, Mar. 5, 1951
People v. Teehankee, G.R. Nos. 111206-08, Oct. 6, 1995
People v. AngGioc, G.R. No. L- 48547, Oct. 31, 1941
People v. Morial, G.R. No. 129295, Aug. 15, 2001
People v. Serzo, Jr., G.R. No. 118435, June 20, 1997
People v. Ayson, G.R. No. L-28508-9, July 7, 1989
Jacob vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 162206, 17 November 2010
Crisostomo vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 152398, 14 April 2005*
People vs. Abatayo, G.R. No. 139456, 07 July 2004
People vs. Larrañaga, G.R. Nos. 138874-75, 03 February 2004
Pielago vs. People, G.R. No. 202020, 13 March 2013

2. Rights of persons under custodial investigation

People v. Sunga, 399 SCRA 624
People v. Jose Ting LanUy, G.R. No. 157399, Nov. 17, 2005
People v. Duenas, Jr. 426 SCRA 666
People v. Mahinay, G.R. No. 122485, Feb. 1, 1999

H. Arraignment and Plea (Rule 116)

1. Arraignment and plea, how made
Borja v. Mendoza, 77 SCRA 42
RA 8493 Speedy Trial Act
RA 7610 (Child Abuse Act
RA 9165
 SC AO 104-96
Teehankee Jr. v. Madayag GR NO 103102, March 6, 1992
People v. Pangilinan 518 SCRA 358
People v. Comendador GR No. L-38000, September 19, 1980
People v. Villasco, G.R. No. L-4706, July 24, 1951 

Bandoy vs. Jacinto, Jr., A.M. No. RTJ-14-2399, 19 November 2014
Ramiscal, Jr. vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 172476-99, 15 September 2010
Pielago vs. People, Supra.
Kummer vs. People, G.R. No. 174461, 11 September 2013
People vs. Moro Sabilul, 93 SCRA 567
People vs. Magat, 332 SCRA 517
People vs. Pangilinan, 518 SCRA 358
People vs. Espinosa, 409 SCRA 256
A.M. No. 02-1-18-SC, Supra.
R.A. No. 8493 (Speedy Trial Act of 1998)
A.M. No. 12-11-2-SC Guidelines for Decongesting Holding Jails by Enforcing the Rights of
the Accused Persons to Bail and to Speedy Trial
2. When should plea of not guilty be entered
3. When may accused enter a plea of guilty to a lesser offense
Daan v. Sandiganbayan GR No. 163972-77, March 28, 2008
Bug-atan vs. People, G.R. No. 175195, 15 September 2010, 630 SCRA 537*
Heirs of Gevero vs. Guihing Agricultural and Development Corp., G.R. No.
122619, 18 August 2006
Daan vs. Sandiganbayan, 550 SCRA 233*
People vs. Villarama, 210 SCRA 246
4. Accused plead guilty to capital offense, what the court should do
People v. Basa, 51 SCRA 317
People vs. Baharan, G.R. No. 188314, 10 January 2011
People vs. Gambao, et al., G.R. No. 172707, 01 October 2013, 706 SCRA 508*
People vs. Durango, 329 SCRA 758
People vs. Ceredon, 542 SCRA 550
5.Plea of Guilty to Non-Capital Offense; Reception of Evidence, Discretionary
People vs. Flores, G.R. No. 137491, 23 November 2000
6.Withdrawal of Improvident Plea of Guilty
People vs. Solamillo, G.R. No. 123161, 18 June 2003
7.Duty of Court to Inform Accused of his Right to Counsel
Gamas vs. Oco, A.M. No. MTJ-99-1231, 17 March 2004
8.Appointment of Counsel de Officio
PAO vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 154297-300, 15 February 2008
9.Time for Counsel de Officio to Prepare for Arraignment
People vs. Gonzaga, G.R. No. L-48373, 30 January 1984
10.Bill of Particulars
Enrile vs. People, G.R. No. 213455, 11 August 2015, 766 SCRA 1*
Virata vs. Sandiganbayan, 221 SCRA 52
11.Production or Inspection of Material Evidence in Possession of Prosecution
Lejano vs. People, G.R. Nos. 176389 and 176864, 14 December 2010
12.Suspension of Arraignment
ABS-CBN Corp. Vs. Gozon, G.R. No. 195956, 11 March 2015
Aguinaldo vs. Ventus, G.R. No. 176033, 11 March 2015
13. Searching Inquiry
PAGE 10 OF 15
Course Syllabus in Criminal Procedure
1st Semester, SY 2022-2023
Fiscal Eugene P. Kho
X==============X

I. Motion to Quash (Rule 117)

1. Grounds
People v. Yutila, G.R. No. L- 34332, Jan. 27, 1981
People v. Misola, G.R. No. L-3606, Dec. 29, 1950
People v. Duque, G.R. No. 100285, Aug. 18, 1992
Yapdiangco v. Buencamino, G.R. No. L-31442, June 24, 1983
Galvez v. CA,G.R. No. 120715, Mar. 29, 1996).
Quisay vs. People, Supra.
Enrile vs. People, Supra.
In Re Salibo vs. Warden, Supra.
Estrada vs. Office of the Ombudsman, Supra.
Lazarte, Jr. vs. Sandiganbayan, 581 SCRA 431
Uy vs. CA, 276 SCRA 367
Eugenio vs. People, 549 SCRA 433
People vs. Rondero, 320 SCRA 383
Romualdez vs. Sandiganbayan, 385 SCRA 436
Sasot vs. People, 462 SCRA 138
Pecho vs. Sandiganbayan, 238 SCRA 116
People vs. Desuyo, 381 SCRA 235
Monteverde vs. People, 387 SCRA 196
Loney vs. People, 482 SCRA 194
Cabico vs. Dimaculangan-Querijero, 522 SCRA 300
Poblete vs. Sandiganbayan, 426 SCRA 346
Valencia vs. Sandiganbayan, 433 SCRA 88
Tan vs. COMELEC, 237 SCRA 353
2.Time to Move to Quash
Tolentino vs. Paqueo, G.R. No. 150606, 07 June 2007*
3.Form and Contents
People vs. Andrade, G.R. No. 187000, 24 November 2014
Tolentino vs. Paqueo, Id.
4. Distinguish from demurrer to evidence
5. Effects of sustaining the motion to quash
Bulaong v. CA, G.R. No. 78555, Jan. 30, 1990
Acharon v. Purisima, GR No. 23731, February 26, 1965
Gonzales vs. Salvador, G.R. No. 168340, December 5, 2006
6. Exception to the rule that sustaining the motion is not a bar to another prosecution
7. Double jeopardy
People v. Obsania, 23 SCRA 1249
Ivler v. Modesto- San Pedro, GR No. 172716, November 17, 2010
People v. Buan, GR No. L-15974, March 29, 1968
Melo v. People, 85 Phil 766
8. Provisional dismissal
Bonsubre, Jr. vs. Yerro, G.R. No. 205952, 11 February 2015
Co vs. New Propserity Plastic Products, G.R. No. 183994, 30 June 2014
Los Baños vs. Pedro, G.R. No. 173588, 22 April 2009, 586 SCRA 303*
People vs. Lacson, 400 SCRA 267
Torres vs. Aguinaldo, 461 SCRA 599
9.Failure to Move to Quash or to Allege Any Ground Therefor
People vs. Andrade, Supra.
People vs. Asilan, Supra.

J. Pre-trial (Rule 118)

PAGE 11 OF 15
Course Syllabus in Criminal Procedure
1st Semester, SY 2022-2023
Fiscal Eugene P. Kho
X==============X

1. Matters to be considered during pre-trial

Zaldivar vs. People, G.R. No. 197056, 02 March 2016
Daan vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 163972-77, 28 March 2008
A.M. No. 03-1-09-SC (Rule on Guidelines to be Observed by the Trial Court Judges
and Clerks of Court in the Conduct of Pre-Trial and Use of Deposition-Discovery
Measures)
A.M. No. 04-1-12-SC-PHILJA, Revised Guidelines for the Implementation of an Enhanced
Pre-Trial Proceeding under the Justice Reform Initiative Support (JURIS) Project
A.M. No. 11-1-6-SC-PHILJA (Re: Consolidated and Revised Guidelines to Implement the
Expanded Coverage of Court-Annexed mediation [CAM] and Judicial Dispute
Resolution [JDR])
2. What the court should do when prosecution and offended party agree to the plea offered by the accused
3. Pre-trial agreement
Daan vs. Sandiganbayan, Id.
4. Non-appearance during pre-trial
Garayblas vs. Ong, G.R. 174507-30, 03 August 2011
5. Pre-trial Order
People vs. Guzman, G.R. No. 169246, 26 January 2007
6. Referral of some cases for court annexed mediation and judicial dispute resolution

K. Trial (Rule 119)

Republic v. Sandiganbayan, 416 SCRA 133, 2003
1.Time to Prepare for Trial
Mari vs. Gonzales, G.R. No. 187728, 12 September 2011
2.Continuous Trial Until Terminated; Postponements
Tan vs. People, G.R. No. 173637, 21 April 2009
Sps. Uy vs. Adriano, G.R. No. 159098, 27 October 2006
R.A. No. 8493, Supra.
A.M. No. 15-06-10-SC, Re: Adopting the Guidelines for Continuous Trial of Criminal Cases in Pilot Courts
A.M. No. 00-4-07-SC, Rule on Examination of Child Witness
3.Exclusions
Mari vs. Gonzales, Supra.
4.Extended Time Limit
Olbes vs. Buemio, G.R. No. 173319, 04 December 2009
5.Sanctions
Caballes vs. CA, G.R. No. 163108, 23 February 2005
6.Remedy Where Accused is not Brought to Trial Within the Time Limit
Sps. Uy v. Adriano, Supra.
7.Speedy Trial
8.Order of Trial
People vs. Marcial, G.R. Nos. 152864-85, 27 September 2006
9.Application for Examination of Witness for Accused Before Trial
Jaylo vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 111502-04, 22 November 2001
10.Examination of Defense Witness; How Made
Jaylo vs. Sandiganbayan, Id.,
11.Bail to Secure Appearance of Material Witness
Seludo vs. Fineza, A.M. No. RTJ-03-1813, 21 November 2003
12.Examination of Witness for the Prosecution
Go v. People, G.R. No. 185527, 18 July 2012
Vda. De Manguerra vs. Risos, G.R. No. 152643, 28 August 2008
13. Instances when presence of accused is required by law
R.A. 8493, Speedy Trial Act
14. Requisite before trial can be suspended on account of absence of witness
15. Trial in absentia
Parada v. Veneracion, A.M. No.RTJ- 96-1353. March 11, 1997
16. Remedy when accused is not brought to trial within the prescribed period
17. Requisites for discharge of accused to become a state witness
PAGE 12 OF 15
Course Syllabus in Criminal Procedure
1st Semester, SY 2022-2023
Fiscal Eugene P. Kho
X==============X

People v. Ferrer, G.R. No. 102062, Mar. 14, 1996

R.A. 6981, Witness Protection Act
18. Effects of discharge of accused as state witness
People v. Feliciano, G.R. No. 136258, Oct. 10, 2001
People v. Beberino GR No L-23213 October 28, 1977
Jimenez, Jr. vs. People, G.R. Nos. 209195 and 209215, 17 September 2014
Monge vs. People, G.R. No. 170308, 07 March 2008
Ampatuan, Jr. vs. De Lima, 695 SCRA 159
Valerio vs. CA, 535 SCRA 453
Flores vs. Sandiganbayan, 124 SCRA 109
19.Discharge of Accused Operates as Acquittal
Monge vs. People, Id.
20.When Mistake has been Made in Charging the Proper Offense
Pacoy v. Cajigal, G.R. No. 157472, 28 September 2007
21.Exclusion of the Public
Perez v. Estrada, A.M. No. 01-4-03-SC, 29 June 2001
22.Consolidation of Trials of Related Offenses
People vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 149495, 21 August 2003
23. Demurrer to evidence
People v. Mahinay, G.R. No. 109613, July 17, 1995
Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 220598, 19 July 2016
People vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 197953, 05 August 2015
24.Reopening
Re: Complaint against Ofelia Pinto, A.M. No. RTJ-11-2289, 02 October 2012
Cabarles vs. Maceda, G.R. No. 161330, 20 February 2007

L. Judgment (Rule 120)

1. Requisites of a judgment
Barbers v. Laguio Jr., AM No. RTJ-00-1568, February 15, 2001
Tan vs. Ramirez, G.R. No. 158929, 03 August 2010
2. Contents of judgment
Francisco v. CA, G.R. No. L-45674, May 30, 1983
R.A. 9344, Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006
Declarador v. Gubaton, G.R. No. 159208, Aug. 18, 2006
People v. Francisco, G.R. No. 102976, Oct. 25, 1995
R.A. 9344, Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006
Bacolod vs. People, G.R. No. 206236, 15 July 2013
Garces vs. Hernandez, Jr., G.R. No. 180761, 09 August 2010
Zafra vs. People, G.R. No. 176317, 23 July 2014
Administrative Circular No. 83-15 (Protocols and Procedures in the Promulgation,
Publication, and Posting on the Websites of Decisions, Final Resolutions, and
Final Orders Using Fictitious Names)
3. Judgment for Two or More Offenses
People vs. Lindo, G.R. No. 189818, 09 August 2010
4.Judgment in Case of Variance in Allegation and Proof
Ricalde vs. People, G.R. No. 211002, 21 January 2015
People vs. Pareja, G.R. No. 202122, 15 January 2014
5.When an Offense Includes or is Included in Another
Asistio vs. People, G.R. No. 200465, 20 April 2015
3. Promulgation of judgment; instances of promulgation of judgment in absentia
Salvador vs. Chua, G.R. No. 212865, 15 July 2015
Jaylo vs. Sandiganbayan (First), G.R. Nos. 183152-54, 21 January 2015, 746 SCRA 452
Pascua vs. CA, 348 SCRA 197
People vs. Taruc, 576 SCRA 682*
Icdang vs. Sandiganbayan, 664 SCRA 253
4.Modification of Judgment
PAGE 13 OF 15
Course Syllabus in Criminal Procedure
1st Semester, SY 2022-2023
Fiscal Eugene P. Kho
X==============X

Villareal vs. People, G.R. Nos. 151258, etc., 01 December 2014

5. When does judgment become final (four instances)
6. Entry of Judgment
7. Existing Provision Governing Suspension of Sentence

M. New Trial or Reconsideration (Rule 121)

1. Grounds for new trial
Aguilar v. Court of Appeals GR No. 114282, November 28, 1995
Tan Ang Bun v. Court of Appeals G.R. No. L-47747, Feb. 15, 1990
Paredes v. Borja, G.R. No. L- 15559, Nov. 29, 1961
People v. Ballabare, G.R. No. 108871, Nov. 19, 1996
Tadeja vs. People, G.R. No. 145336, 20 February 2013
Custodio vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 96027-28, 08 March 2005
Payumo vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 151911 and 154537, 24 July 2011
Dinglasan, Jr. vs. CA, G.R. No. 145420, 19 September 2006
2. Grounds for reconsideration
3. Requisites before a new trial may be granted on ground of newly discovered evidence
Abrajano v. CA, G.R. No. 114282, Oct. 13, 2000)
4. Form of Motion and Notice to the Prosecutor
Flores vs. People, G.R. No. 203961, 29 July 2015
5. Effects of granting a new trial or reconsideration
People vs. Licayan, G.R. No. 203961, 29 July 2015
6. Application of Neypes doctrine in criminal cases
Neypes v. CA, G.R. No. 141524, Sept. 14, 2005

N. Appeal (Rule 122)

1. Effect of an appeal
2. Who May Appeal
Burgos, Jr. vs. Sps. Naval, G.R. No. 219468, 08 June 2016
People vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 164577, 05 July 2010
People vs. Hernandez, G.R. No. 154218 and 154372, 28 August 200
3. Where to Appeal
Macapagal vs. People, G.R. No. 193217, 26 February 2014
4. How Appeal Taken
Sanico vs. People, G.R. No. 198753, 25 March 2015
Macapagal vs. People, Id.
People vs. Mateo, G.R. Nos. 147648-87, 07 July 2004
A.M. 00-5-03-SC, October 3, 2002
5. When Appeal to be Taken
Macapagal vs. People, Id.
Ramirez vs. People, G.R. No. 197832, 02 October 2013
Rodriguez vs. People, G.R. No. 192799, 24 October 2012
People vs. Rocha, G.R. No. 173797, 31 August 2007
7. Effect of Appeal by any of Several Accused
People v. Fernandez, G.R. No. 80481, June 27, 1990
Benabaye vs. People, G.R. No. 203466, 25 February 2015
People vs. Valdez, G.R. No. 175602, 13 February 2013
People vs. Brillantes, G.R. No. 190610, 25 April 2012
8. Grounds for Dismissal of Appeal
9. Withdrawal of Appeal
Moll vs. Buban, G.R. No. 136974, 27 August 2002
10.Appointment of Counsel de Officio for Accused on Appeal
People vs. Rio, G.R. No. 90294, 24 September 1991

O. Search and Seizure (Rule 126)

1. Nature of search warrant
PAGE 14 OF 15
Course Syllabus in Criminal Procedure
1st Semester, SY 2022-2023
Fiscal Eugene P. Kho
X==============X

People v. Veloso GR No L- 23051, October 20, 1925

Prudente v. Dayrit GR No. 82870, December 14, 1989
Stonehill v. Diokno, G.R. No. L-19550, June 19, 1967
Katz vs. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
People vs. Marti, G.R. No. 81561, 18 January 1991
Te vs. Breva, G.R. No. 164974, 05 August 2015, 765 SCRA 40*
Santos vs. Pryce Gases, Inc., 539 SCRA 474
2. Distinguish from warrant of arrest
3. Application for search warrant, where filed
Sps. Marimla v. People of the Philippines, GR No. 158467, October 16, 2009
Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corp. vs. Romars International Gases Corp., G.R. No. 189669,
16 ebruary 2015
Laud vs. People, G.R. No. 199032, 19 November 2014
Malaloan vs. CA, 232 SCRA 249
People vs. Chiu, 424 SCRA 72
Sony Computer Entertainment vs. Supergreen, 518 SCRA 750
Administrative Circular No. 13-85 (Guidelines and Procedures in the Issuance of
Search Warrants)
SC Circular No. 19-87 (Amended Guidelines and Procedures on Applications for Search
Warrants for Illegal Possession of Firearms and other Serious Crimes filed in
Metro Manila Courts and other Courts with Multiple Salas)
A.M. No. 99-10-09-SC, Resolution Clarifying Guidelines on the Application for and
Enforceability of Search Warrants
4. Probable cause
Burgos v. Chief of Staff, G.R. No. L-65334, Dec. 26, 1984
Harvey v. Defensor- Santiago GR No 82544, June 28, 1988
Tiu Chun Hai v. Commissioner, G.R. No. L-10009 December 22, 1958
5. Personal examination by judge of the applicant and witnesses
Marinas v. Siochi, G.R. Nos. 
L-25707 & 25753-25754, May 14, 1981 

Roan v. Gonzales, G.R. No. 71410, Nov. 25, 1986
Mata v. Bayona, G.R. No. L-50720, Mar. 26, 1984
6. Particularity of place to be searched and things to be seized
Burgos v. Chief of Staff, G.R. No. L-65332, Dec. 26, 1984
People v. Rubio, GR No L-35500, October 27, 1932
Stonehill v. Diokno, G.R. No. L-19550, June 19, 1967
7. Personal property to be seized
Burgos v. Chief of Staff, G.R. No. L-65332, Dec. 26, 1984
Laud vs. People, Id.
Worldwide Web Corp. vs. People, Supra.
People vs. Nuñez, 591 SCRA 394
Tambasen vs. People, 246 SCRA 184
8.Requisites for Issuing Search Warrant
Laud vs. People, Id.
PLDT vs. Alvarez, G.R. No. 179408, 05 March 2014
La Chemise Lacoste vs. Fernandez, 129 SCRA 373
Hon Ne Chan vs. Honda, 541 SCRA 249
Kho vs. Makalintal, 306 SCRA 70
Uy vs. BIR, 344 SCRA 36
9.Examination of Complainant; Record
Ogayon vs. People, G.R. No. 188794, 788 SCRA 670*
Balayon, Jr. vs. Dinopol, 490 SCRA 547
People vs. Salanguit, 356 SCRA 683
People vs. Dichoso, 180 SCRA 69
10.Issuance and Form of Search Warrant
People vs. Mamaril, G.R. No. 171980, 06 October 2010
11.Right to Break Door or Window to Effect Search
PAGE 15 OF 15
Course Syllabus in Criminal Procedure
1st Semester, SY 2022-2023
Fiscal Eugene P. Kho
X==============X

Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. vs. Bright Future Technologies, Inc., G.R. No. 169156, 15
February 2007
People vs. Huang Zhen Hua, G.R. No. 139301, 29 September 2004
12.Search of House, Room, or Premises to be Made in Presence of Two Witnesses
People vs. Punzalan, G.R. No. 199087, 11 November 2015
13.Time of Making Search
People vs. Padilla, G.R. No. 172603, 24 August 2007
14.Validity of Search Warrant
Lacadin vs. Mangino, A.M. No. MTJ-01-1346, 09 July 2003, 405 SCRA 473*
15.Receipt for the Property Seized
People vs. del Castillo, G.R. No. 153254, 30 September 2004
People vs. Policarpio, 158 SCRA 88
People vs. Go, 411 SCRA 81
People vs. Endaya, 731 SCRA 1
Quinicot vs. People, 590 SCRA 458
16.Delivery of Property and Inventory Thereof to Court; Return and Proceedings Thereon
Tenorio vs. CA, G.R. No. 110604, 10 October 2003
People vs. del Castillo, Id.
People vs. Go, G.R. No. 144639, 12 September 2003
Betoy, Sr. vs. Coliflores, 483 SCRA 435
Mallillin vs. People, 553 SCRA 619
People vs. CFI of Rizal, 101 SCRA 86
17. Exceptions to search warrant requirement
a) Search incidental to lawful arrest
People v. Musa, G.R. No. 95329, Jan. 27, 1993
People vs. Calantiao, G.R. No. 203984, 18 June 2014
People vs. Belocura, G.R. No. 173474, 29 August 2012
b) Consented search
People v. Burgos, G.R. No. 
92739, Aug. 2, 1991
c) Search of moving vehicle
People v. Lo Ho Wing, G.R. No. 88017, Jan. 21, 1991
d) Check points; body checks in airport
People v. Vinecario, G.R. No. 141137, January 20, 2004
People v. Johnson, G.R. No. 138881, December 18, 2000
e) Plain view situation
People v. Concepcion, 361 SCRA 540
People v. Sarap, 399 SCRA 503
People v. Go; 411 SCRA 81
f) Stop and frisk situation
Malacat v. Court of Appeals, 283 SCRA 159
Manalili v. CA, G.R. No. 113447, Oct. 9, 1997
g) Enforcement of custom laws
h) Remedies from unlawful search and seizure
18.Motion to Quash a Search Warrant or to Suppress Evidence; Where to File
Ogayon vs. People, Id.
SEC vs. Mendoza, G.R. No. 170425, 23 April 2012

P. Provisional Remedies (Rule 127)

1. Nature
Cala v. Roldan, G.R. No. L-252, Mar. 30, 1946
2. Kinds of provisional remedies
Mindanao Savings, etc v. Court of Appeals, 172 SCRA 480
3. Attachment
Oñate v. Abrogar, G.R. Nos. 107303 and 107491, 23 February 1995
A.M. No. 09-6-8-SC (Rules of Procedure for Environmental Cases)