Impact of Mining On Forests and Its Biological Div
Impact of Mining On Forests and Its Biological Div
1; July, 2018
ISSN 2591-779X
Published by July Press
Received: June 21, 2018 Accepted: July 10, 2018 Online Published: July 17, 2018
doi:10.20849/jess.v1i1.420 URL: https://doi.org/10.20849/jess.v1i1.420
Abstract
Mining activities have several impacts on the environment. In our study, emphasis was given to assess biodiversity
in one of the leading iron ore mining sites of Bailadila-Kirandul Iron Ore Mines (KIOM) of Dantewada District,
South Bastar of Chhattisgarh. Habitat fragmentation, loss and deforestation are highly prevalent in the area.
However, the study reveals high species richness of 110 and 253 plant species in core and buffer zone respectively.
Canopy cover was found to be within 10 to 40% and in places in the buffer zone canopy cover with > 40% was
recorded. Species diversity index indicates the instability of vegetation structure in the area with indices of 1.44
in core and 1.88 in buffer zone. Although species richness is high, about 10 floral species (7 herbs, 3 trees) are
recorded under REET (Rare Endangered Extinct Threatened) species while locally endangered floral species are
6 and locally critically endangered are 4. Similarly, 208 faunal species belong to 10 faunal groups was recorded
out of which 34 species are listed in different Schedules of Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Therefore, it is
an urgent need for planning to undertake appropriate management strategies to conserve biodiversity in the area.
Keywords: biodiversity, species diversity, dominance, canopy statistics, life forms
1. Introduction
Significant and potential risks are found for tropical forests in the world due to mining processes. Globally, over
the past 10 years, the mineral production have risen (Kooroshey et al., 2014). A study by Sonter et al., 2017
shows loss of Amazon forest of about 11,670km2 area deforestation between the years 2005 to 2015 where 9% of
the loss is contributed by mining leases. The area that includes extensive forest resources, in some of which
mining—directly and/or indirectly—is thought to have contributed to significant deforestation (Swenson et al.,
2011). Similarly, gold mining at Peruvian Amazon also resulted in deforestation (Asner et al., 2013). A sharp
increase in mineral prices can result in a surge in mining activity, which contributes to deforestation in some
locations. A study by the University of Puerto Rico found that tree cover loss in the Madre de Dios region of
Peru has increased significantly since 2007 as a result of artisanal gold mining (Alvarez-Berríos & Aide, 2015).
Area of land involved in mining is small but it affects the surrounding area along with its species, and it is very
intensive and very destructive (Mather, 1991; Sands, 2005). Mining is a lucrative activity promoting
development booms which may attract population growth with consequent deforestation. The deforestation rate
due to mining activities in Guyana from 2000 to 2008 increased 2.77 times according to an assessment by the
World Wildlife Fund-Guianas (Staff, 2010). Similarly, in the Philippines, mining, along with logging, has been
among the forces behind the country’s loss of forest cover: from 17 million hectares in 1934 to just three million
in 2003 or an 82 per cent decline (Docena, 2010). Nearly 2,000 hectares of tropical forest in the Municipality of
Coahuayana in the State of Michoacán (south-western Mexico) will completely be destroyed by mining iron
minerals planned by the Italo-Argentine mining company TERNIUM (Anonymous, 2008). Similarly, Nyamagari
hills in Orissa India currently threatened by Vedanta Aluminum Corporation’s plan to start bauxite mining will
destroy 750 hectares of reserved forest (Griffiths & Hirvela, 2008). Massive and unchecked mining of coal, iron
ore and bauxite in Jharkhand, India has caused large scale deforestation and created a huge water scarcity
(Anonymous, 2011). In return for US$3.8 billion of investment, the agreements between the State government of
Jharkhand, India and mining companies, there will be a massive land acquisition which will deforest no less than
57,000 hectares of forest and displace 9,615 families, many of them located in legally protected Scheduled Areas
16
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
set aside for indigenous peoples in the State (Mullick & Griffiths, 2007). Moreover, Roads constructed to
support the mining operations will open up the area to shifting agriculturists, permanent farmers, ranchers, land
speculators and infrastructure developers. For instance the core of Brazil’s Amazon development strategy were
infra-structure development projects such as roads providing access to frontier regions, mining area and large
hydroelectric reservoirs (Mahar, 1988; Fearnside & Barbosa, 1996; Carvalho et al., 2002, 2004).
Therefore, one of the key underlying assumptions about biodiversity management is that native species and
ecological processes are most likely to be maintained. To maintain and strengthen the biodiversity management
recommendations are primarily aimed at managed forests. The recommendations are designed to promote long
term stand level maintenance and recruitment of important structural attributes such as: wildlife, diversity of
species, special or unique habitats for floral and faunal wealth, riparian areas and wetlands, coarse woody debris,
horizontal and vertical structural diversity.
National Mineral Development Corporation (NMDC) is India’s single largest iron ore producer and exporter,
presently producing about 30 million tons of iron ore from 3 fully mechanized mines viz., Bailadila
Deposit-14/11C, Bailadila Deposit-5, 10/11A both within the state of Chhattisgarh and Kumaraswamy and
Donimalai Iron Ore Mines (Karnataka State) which are awarded ISO 9001:2008, ISO 14001:2004 and OHSAS
18001:2007 certification. The iron Ores of Bailadila ranges being the purest in the world is valued highly in the
international market. Bailadila range of hills has iron ore reserve of above 1500 million tons of high grade iron
ore in 14 deposits.
Dantewada district has rich forest reserves with 64% of its land under forest cover and almost 79% tribal
population. Although rich in natural wealth, the district has not seen much development, only 30% of the
populations are literate and the district ranks seventh among the 150 backward districts of the country. Therefore
the study area is selected to explore further for knowing the impacts of mining on forests. The main objective of
the study is understanding various components of the ecosystems in the core as well as buffer zone and to study
floral and faunal diversity in the proposed area of mines that aims to achieve the structural as well as functional
aspects of it through proper management policies, and adopting scientific approach towards preparing
biodiversity conservation and management plan to provide alternate habitat for existing flora and fauna in the
ML as well as buffer zone.
2. Method
2.1 Study Area
Bailadila lies in the Survey of India topo-sheet no. 65F/2 within latitude 18°32ʹ32ʺN and 19°36ʹ5ʺN and
longitude 81°13ʹ and 81°14ʹ30ʺ. The study area comes under Kirandul Iron Ore Mine (KIOM) (Figure 1). Total
area within Kirandul Mining Project is 1364.115ha under three deposits adjacent to reach other namely (i)
Deposit-14 (322.368ha) ML area (ii) Deposit-14 NMZ (506.742ha) ML area and (iii) Deposit-11B (535.005 ha)
ML area. The study covers 10 km radius around the core area.
Figure 1. Location map of the iron ore deposits (Mining lease area) and buffer zone of 10km radius of study area
17
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
18
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
19
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
20
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
21
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
22
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
iii. The Central valley—the central valley do not come under the study site but is in the buffer area has species
like Saja (Terminalia alata), Bijasal (Pterocarpus marsupium), Kusum (Schleichera oleosa), Semal (Bombax
ceiba), Kala-Siris (Albizzia lebbbek), and Kadamba (Anthocephalus cadamba), etc. Bamboo is conspicuously
low in this region. Here are few types of forests dominated by species as stated below provided undisturbed. Saja
forest, Dhaora (Anogeisus latifolia) forest, Garari (Cleistanthus collinus) forest, Bhirra (Chloroxylon swietenia)
forest, Khair (Acacia catechu) forest, Jamun (Syzygium cumini) forest, Anjan (Hardwickia binata) forest, and
Mixed Forest with miscellaneous species.
The major floral associations of the forest area of Bailadila are grouped under the following six categories basing
on the description of earlier authors and present study of IVI (Table 2).
23
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
2%
4% Phanerophytes
10%
Therophytes
48%
Hydrophytes
36% Hemicryptophytes
Geophytes
Table 3. List of plant species at core area of Kirandul Iron Ore Mine
Sl. No. Scientific name of the species Family
Tree
1 Acacia auriculiformis Fabaceae
2 Adina cordifolia Rubiaceae
3 Aegle mermelos Rutaceae
4 Albizzia procera Fabaceae
5 Bauhinia acuminate Fabaceae
6 Boswellia serreta Burseraceae
7 Buchanania lanzen Anacardiaceae
8 Butea monosperma Fabaceae
9 Cassia fistula Fabaceae
10 Cedrela tonna Meliaceae
11 Cliestanthus collinus Euphorbiaceae
12 Dillenia pentagyna Dilleniaceae
13 Diospyros melanoxylon Ebnaceae
14 Emblica officinales Euphorbiaceae
15 Ixora arborea Rubiaceae
16 Kydia sp. Malvaceae
24
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
25
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
26
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
Table 4. List of plant species at buffer area of Kirandul Iron Ore Mine
Sl. No. Scientific name of the species Family
Tree
1 Acacia catechu Fabaceae
2 Acacia leucophloea Fabaceae
3 Adina cordifolia Rubiaceae
4 Aegle mermelos Rutaceae
5 Alanzium lamarkii Cornaceae
6 Albizzia lebbek Fabaceae
7 Albizzia odoratissima Fabaceae
8 Albizzia procera Fabaceae
9 Anogeissus latifolia Combretaceae
10 Anthocephalus cadamba Rubiaceae
27
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
28
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
29
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
30
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
31
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
32
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
The diversity index (Table 5) in the tree level (2.10) is much more in the buffer zone in comparison to core zone
(1.44). However, in our study, the species diversity index is lower than compared to other studies done at Eastern
Ghats (Sahu et al., 2007; Reddy et al., 2008; Ganguli et al., 2016). Anthropogenic activity within forest area
seems to be low in the tree layer as observed from the count of cut off stumps. Canopy cover in most places of
the forest area in this zone is within 40-70% which is known to be dense forest as per the FSI classification.
33
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
Dominance index in the tree level of the buffer zone is only 0.27 which is much lower to 0.36 in comparison to
core zone. This signifies that the tree layer in the buffer zone is shared by many species rather than a few ones
which is a tendency towards mixed forest type rather than dominance of few tree species. Dominancy of single
species is often attributed to niche diversification, disease, species competition and grazing (Whittaker & Levin,
1977; Harper, 1977). It is also observed that within the buffer zone there are few important species like Bauhinia
malabarica, Cedrela toona Dalbergia paniculata, Croton oblongifolia, Shorea robusta, and Annona squoamosa
which are considered to be prominent forest species of central India. The availability of some of these species is
not very frequent in the core zone. Species like Borassus flabellifer, Azadirachta indica, Terminalia tomentosa,
Eugenia jambolana, Ficus glomerata, Terminalia arjuna, Diospyros montana, and Mangifera indica share the
tree canopy layer in the non-forest area of the buffer zone. Diversity in the tree level in the non-forest areas is
further enhanced by the availability of non-forest species like Mangifera indica, and Acacia auriculiformis, etc.
Shrub species like Lantana camara and Eupatorium odoratum, Parthenium sp are also available in this region
which is considered to be the invasive species in Indian forests as well as non-forest areas. These invasive
species are also very frequently available in the core area. Availability of these species in the buffer zone
signifies that there is considerable anthropogenic intervention in the ecosystem which has resulted in alteration
of species composition of the core as well as buffer zone which is similar to the studies on impact of invasive
species on forests (Gordon, 1998; Sanders et al., 2003; Charles & Dukes, 2007; Capers et al., 2009; Devine &
Fei, 2011; Priyanka & Joshi, 2013).
There may be less extraction of forest resources form the buffer zone due to its remoteness but long term impact
of human habitation and planting of domesticated species and exotic species like teak and Eucalyptus sp
certainly have a negative impact on the ecosystem. This is why initiative on the part of NMDC in developing
positive attitude towards conserving the forest resources in the buffer zone is suggested. Habitat development,
therefore, cannot confine within the efforts of plantation, water body creation or soil conservation only. It also
will include developing participatory conservation approach taking the villagers of the buffer as well as fringe
area in to confidence. There is a clear negative relationship between the diversity and dominance indices in both
core and buffer zone. In the buffer zone this relationship is more evident because of its pristine nature.
3.5 Faunal Study
The State of Chhattisgarh falls under the Deccan Bio-geographical Zone (Rodgers et al., 2000). Of its forests, 11%
are under the Protected Area Network. During the study period around 208 species belongs to 10 Faunal Groups
recorded from the Core and Buffer Areas of Kirandul Complex Iron Ore Mines study sites, in that 18 species
recorded belongs to Mollusca; 1 species of Crustacean; 19 species of Odonata; 41 species of Lepidoptera; 3
species of Hymenoptera; 8 species of Fishes; 4 species of Amphibians; 7 species of Reptiles; 92 species of Birds
and 15 species of Mammals. Out of total 208 species recorded, 34 species (i.e., 1 species of Lepidoptera, 21
species of Birds and 12 species of Mammals) are listed in different Schedules of Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act,
1972 (Table 6). The locatrion map of different species spotted in the study area is shown in Figure 3.
34
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
Table 6. Details of Fauna recorded at Kirandul Iron Ore Mine (Core and Buffer Area)
Sl. No. Species Kirandul Complex Iron Ore Mines
Deposit Deposit Buffer
Deposit 14
14NMZ 11B Area
(A) Mollusca
1 Bellamya bengalensis form typica - - - +
2 Bellamya crassa - - - +
3 Bellamya dissimilis - - - +
4 Bithynia (Digoniostoma) cerameopoma - - - +
5 Bithynia (Digoniostoma) pulchella - - - +
6 Melanoides tuberculata - - - +
7 Tarebia lineata - - - +
Lymnaea (Pseudosuccinea) acuminata form
8 - - - +
typica and form chlamys
9 Lymnaea (Pseudosuccinea) luteola form typica - - - +
10 Lamellidens corrianus - - - +
11 Lamellidens marginalis - - - +
12 Corbicula striatella - - - +
13 Cyclophorus (Litostylus) polynema - - - +
14 Edouardia orbus - - - +
15 Pterocylus rupestris - - - +
16 Ariophanta laidlayana - + - +
17 Hemiplecta basileus - - - +
18 Macrochlamys indica + - - +
(B) Crustacean (Crab)
19 Brachytelphusa jaquemontii - - - +
(C) Odonata (Damsel & Dragonflies)
20 Ceriagrion coromandelianum - - - +
21 Ischnura aurora - - - +
22 Pseudagrion rubriceps - - - +
23 Ictinogomphus rapax - - - +
24 Anax immaculifrons - - - +
25 Acisoma panorpoides - - - +
26 Brachythemis contaminata - - - +
27 Crocothemis servilia + - + +
28 Diplacodes trivalis - + - +
29 Orthetrum glaucum - - - +
30 Orthetrum pruinosum + - - +
31 Orthetrum sabina - - + +
32 Orthetrum triangulare - - - +
33 Palpopleura sexmaculata - - - +
34 Pantala flavescens + + + +
35
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
36
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
37
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
38
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
39
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
40
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
Figure 3. Map showing different faunal species found at different locations of the study area
41
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
Aam (Mangifera indica), etc. in the forest patches which are most of the times are over extracted.
3.6.5 Grazing Pressure
Various livestock species reared in the study area include cattle, buffaloes and goats. The grazing pressure leads
to interference of livestock in the wilderness areas, direct competition for forage availability and degraded
quality and reduction in the food availability for herbivores, transmission of communicable diseases and
reduction in area of wilderness needed for the wildlife to sustain.
3.6.6 Poaching:
It is one of the major causes for destruction of wildlife which is still in a practice by local dwellers in the study
area. During the survey, list of Rare Endangered Extinct and Threatened (REET) species were recorded (Table
7).
4. Conclusion
This case study demonstrates the major impact of mining on flora and fauna of Kirandul Iron Ore Mine. The
study entails the total destruction of forest areas within the core zone. A detailed floral account only provides
supportive evidence to ensure the survival of the herbivores and the carnivores, once the adjacent habitat can
offer ecological niche for maintaining a prey predator base. The undulating mountain forest is expected to have
the distribution of the recorded species over a wider area.
It is evident from the study that there are few plant species of rare occurrence in the buffer zone of Kirandul
complex and few animal species within Schedule-I of Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. These species are
likely to be affected by mining project and related construction and other related activities like road construction,
blasting, excavation for mining, and dumping of excavated material. However, human population pressure on
land and biological resources are likely to exert pressure on the biological resources of the region. The existing
natural ecosystems in areas constituting a rich bio-diverse region that need protection and further strengthening
of conservation efforts.
Implementing scientific forest management may be helpful in some participatory forest management contexts,
but it requires users to participate in an unfamiliar knowledge culture and appropriate support mechanisms need
to be in place, particularly if scaling up its use across a country.
Acknowledgement
The authors are thankful to staffs of Indian Institute of Biosocial Research and Development, Kolkata for helping
during extensive field work. Forest Department of South Bastar, Dantewada, Chhhattisgarh is acknowledged for
their assistance during field survey.
References
Alvarez-Berríos, N. L., & Aide, T. M. (2015). Global demand for gold is another threat for tropical forests.
Environmental Research Letters, 10(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014006
Anonymous. (2008, November). Mexico: Mining causes ecocide in Coahuayana, Michoacan. WRM’s bulletin
N.
42
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
Anonymous. (2011, March 5). Mining, deforestation cause severe drought. The Asian Age, New Delhi.
Asner, G. P., Llactayo, W., Tupayachi, R., & Luna, E. R. (2013). Elevated rates of gold mining in the Amazon
revealed through high-resolution monitoring. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(46),
54-59. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1318271110
Bennet, S. S. R. (1987). Name changes of flowering plants of India and adjacent region. Dehradun: Triseas
Publishers.
Braun-Blanquet, J. (1964). Plant Associations, Principles of vegetation, Springer Verlag, Wien, pp 865.
Cain, S. A. (1938). The species-area curve. The American Midland Naturalist, 19(3), 573-581.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2420468
Carvalho, G., Moutinho, P., Nepstad, D., Mattos, L., & Santilli, M. (2004). An Amazon perspective on the
forest-climate connection: opportunity for climate mitigation, conservation and development? Environment,
Development and Sustainability, 6, 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ENVI.0000003635.86980.c0
Carvalho, G., Nepstad, D., McGrath, D., Carmen, D., Vera Diaz, M., Suntilli, M., & Barros, A. C. (2002).
Frontier expansion in the Amazon: balancing development and sustainability. Environment, 44, 34-42.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00139150209605606
Champion, H. G., & Seth, S. K. (1968). A revised Survey of the forest types of India. New Delhi: Government
of India Publications.
Charles, H., & Dukes, S. (2007). Impacts of Invasive Species on Ecosystem Services. In W. Nentwig (Ed.),
Ecological Studies (Vol. 193). Biological Invasions. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36920-2_13
Devine, K., & Fei, S. (2011). A review of impacts by invasive exotic plants on forest ecosystem services.
Proceedings of the 17th Central Hardwood Forest Conference GTR-NRS-P-78.
Docena, H. (2010, December). Philippines: Deforestation through mining subsidized by CDM project. WRM’s
bulletin N 161.
Fearnside, P., & Barbosa, R. (1996). The Cotingo dam as a test of Brazil’s system for evaluating proposed
developments in Amazonia. Environmental Management, 20, 631-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204136
Ganguli, S., Gupta Joshi, H., & Bhattacharya, K. (2016). Vegetation structure ans species diversity in Garh
jungle sacred forest, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Environmental and Agriculture Research,
2(9), 72-79.
Gordon, D. R. (1998). Effects of invasive, non-indigenous plant species on ecosystem processes: lessons from
Florida. Ecological Applications, 8(4), 975-989.
https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0975:EOINIP]2.0.CO;2
Griffiths, T., & Hirvelä, V. V. (2008, January). India: Illegal aluminum refinery in Tribal lands in Orissa. WRM’s
bulletin N 126.
Harper, J. L. (1977). Population Biology of Plants. New York: Academic Press.
Hooker, J. D. (1872-1897). Flora of British India, London (Reprinted Edition 1973.
Jamir, S. A., Upadhaya, K., & Pandey, H. N. (2006). Life form composition and stratification of montane humid
forests in Meghalaya, northeast India. Tropical Ecology, 47(2), 183-190.
Kooroshy, J., Preston, F., & Bradley, S. (2014). Cartels and Competition in Minerals Markets: Challenges for
Global Governance. Chatham House research paper, 1-59.
Kumar, A., Khanna, K. K., & Jha, A. K. (2005). Floristic Diversity of Chhattisgarh (Angiosperms). In Bishen
Singh and Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun (p. 545). New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt.Ltd.
Legris, & Pascal (1982). Explanatory booklet on the map of South India. French Institute Pondicherry.
Mahar, D. (1988). Government policies and Deforestation in Brazil’s Amazon region. Washington DC: World
Bank.
Mather, A. S. (1991). Global Forest Resources. International Book Distributors. Dehra Dun, 311.
McDougal, C. (1997). Tiger Survey Report. A Report Submitted to Departmcnt of National Parks and Wildlife
Conservation. Kathmandu, Nepal.
Mooney, H. F. (1942a). Sketch of the Flora of Bailadila Range in Bastar State, 3(7).
43
http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jess Vol. 1, No. 1; July, 2018
Mooney, H. F. (1942b). Forest Advisor, and Eastern States Agency was published in as Indian Forest Record.
Mullick, B., & Griffiths, T. (2007, March). India: Indigenous movement in Jharkhand challenge plans for
industrial development that threatens to destroy Adivasi forests, farmlands and way of life. WRM’s bulletin
N116.
Philip, E. A. (1959). Methods of Vegetation study. Henry Holt & Co. Inc.
Priyanka, N., & Joshi, P. K. (2013). A review of Lantana camara studies in India. International Journal of
Scientific and Research Publications, 3(10), 1-11.
Reddy, C., Babar, S., Giriraj, A., Reddy, K. N., & Rao, T. (2008). Structure and Floristic Composition of Tree
Diversity in Tropical Dry Deciduous Forest of Eastern Ghats, Southern Andhra Pradesh, India. Asian
Journal of Scientific Research, 1, 57-64. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajsr.2008.57.64
Rodgers, W. A., Panwar, H. S., & Mathur, V. B. (2000). Wildlife Protected Area Network in India: A review.
WildlifeInstitute of India.
Sahu, S. C., Dhal, N. K., Sudhakar Reddy, C., Pattanaik, C., & Brahman, M. (2007). Phytosociological Study of
Tropical Dry Deciduous Forest of Boudh District, Orissa, India. Research Journal of Forestry, 1(2), 66-72.
https://doi.org/10.3923/rjf.2007.66.72
Sanders, N. J., Gotelli, N. J., Heller, N. E., & Gordon, D. M. (2003). Community disassembly by an invasive
species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(5), 2474-7.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0437913100
Sands, R. (2005). Forestry in a Global Context. CABI Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990897.0001
Shannon, C. E., & Wiener, W. (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University
llinois Press.
Shrestha, B., & Basnet, K. (2005). Indirect methods of identifying mammals: A case study from Shivapuri
National Park, Nepal. Ecoprint, 12, 43-58.
Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of Diversity. Nature, 163, 688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
Singh, M. P. Dehradun. Journal of Polymer Materials. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt.Ltd.
Sonter, L. J., Herrera, D., Barrett, D. J., Galford, G. L., Moran, C. J., & Soares-Filho, B. S. (2017). Mining drives
extensive deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nature Communications, 8, 1013.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00557-w
Srnquist, M. E. (1981). The Social Organization of Tiger in Royal Chitwan National Park Nepal. Smithsonian
Contribution to Zoology, 336, 14-98.
Staff, S. (2010, October 13). Mining deforestation nearly tripled between 2000-08 (Archives).
Swenson, J. J., Carter, C. E., Domec, J. C., & Delgado, C. I. (2011). Gold Mining in the Peruvian Amazon:
Global Prices, Deforestation, and Mercury Imports. PLoS ONE, 6(4), e18875.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018875
Tamang, K. M. (1982). The status of the tiger (Panthera tigris) and its impact on principle prey population in
the Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal (doctoral thesis). Michigan, USA: Michigan State University East
Langsing.
Verma, D. M., Pant, P. C., & Hanfi, M. I. (1985). Flora of raipur, Durg and Rajnandgaon. Botanical Survey of
India, Howrah.
Whittaker, R. H., & Levin, S. A. (1977). The role of mosaic phenomena in mosaic communities. Theoretical
Population Biology, 12, 117-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(77)90039-9
Copyrights
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
44