We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11
Variations In Facial Relationshi
Their Significance In Treatment and Prognosis!
Wiasiam B. Downs, D.D.S., MLS.
Aurora, [linois
A large proportion of the orthodontist’s problems stem from the well
known biological fact of variations within the species. This variation is
particularly evident in the human face. The differences are noted in size,
proportion, relationship of parts and even in growth rates. These varia-
tions have been recognized and have lead to classification of facial types,
but there are no sharp demarcations. The gradations from one extreme
to the other in type are innumerable. To complicate further the problem,
the various t) present functional and esthetic harmony
and balance, or they may ent degrees of disharmony and imbalance,
depending on the relationship of the component parts of the face, namely,
the bones of the head, the denture and overlying soft tissue.
‘This paper presents the finding of a study which has been pursued
by the author for the past five years. Tt was undertaken to determine the
range of the skeletal and dental pattern within which one might expect
to find the normal and further to discover whether any usnable correla-
tion existed in such normals.
The method employed in the study was roentgenographie cephalometry
and the technie was that deseribed in various papers familiar to all ortho-
dontists.
The control material studied was derived from twenty living individ-
uals, ranging in age from 12 - 17 years and about equally divided as to
sex. Models, photographs and cephalometric and intraoral roentgenograms
were taken of each. All individuals possessed clinically excellent
occlusions.
Tracings were made of all lateral head x-rays taken with the teeth in
occlusion and the Bolton triangle outlined on each tracing according to
Broadbent's technique, which consists of eonnceting the following points:
(Fig. 1) Nasion to the center of sella tureiea, and sella to the Bolton point,
whieh is the superior point on the concavity behind the occipital condyles.
Continuing from the Bolton point back fo nasion completes the Bolton
triangle, which represents the area at the base of the eranium to which
the face is joined. It is believed by Broadbent to be the most stable area
from which to make serial comparisons. This area itself must, of course,
increase as the head grows, so Broadbent has located a point within the
triangle by taking the mid-point of a perpendienalr from the Bolton
plane to the center of sella turcica. He calls this the registration point.
When serial tracings are studied they may be registered on this point with
their Bolton planes parallel, ‘The other landmarks and planes used in this
study are shown in Fig. 1.
1 From the Graduate Department of Orthodontia, University of Illinois, Chicago.
First prizewinner, Essay Contest of the Ainerican Association of Orthodontia, 1948.
Published in American Jnl. Orthodontics, Oct. 1948 (34:812-40), and reprinted with
permission.
145146 W. B. DOWNS July, 1949
Fre. 1. The skeletal pattern—serial pictures are superimposed at R with the Bolton
planes parallel.
Fic.2. A diagrammatic breakdown of the areas of the head.
For the purpose of this study the head was divided into eranium and
face. (Fig. 2) The face was further divided into (1) upper face, (2)
teeth and alveolar area and (4) lower face or mandible.
As the investigation progressed two objectives developed, to appraise:
(1) the pattern of the facial skeleton exclusive of the teeth and alveolar
process. (2) The relationship of the teeth and alveolar process to the
facial skeleton.
OBSERVATIONS
1. The Skeletal Pattern In Norma-Lateralis
‘The skeleton pattern of the face is determined by the maxillary bones
and the mandible. While the teeth and alveolar process also influence facial
form, they will be considered separately as the denture.
‘The skeletal pattern can be laid out on lateral cephalometric x-rays as
a polygon and its form or pattern deseribed by the angular relationships
of various planes. (Fig. 3) Those to be described in this study are the
Facial angle, Angle of convexity, the antero-posterior relationship of the
denture bases, Mandibular plane angle and the Y axis.
It. is customary for orthodontists to classify facial types according to
the degree of recession or protrusion of the mandible. As this attribute
of facial form is determined by a skeletal foundation, it would obviously
be an advantage to classify skeletal pattern in a manner consistent wit
facial type as this is appraised by examination of the individual or their
photographs. So far it has been found that this can best be accomplished
by relating certain planes of the pattern to the Frankfort horizontal
plane.
Facial Angle (Fig. 4)
This angle is an expression of the degree of recession or protrusion of
the chin. It is determined by drawing a line from nasion to pogonion,
this plane being called the Facial plane. The inferior inside angle of its
Hee with the Frankfort horizontal is designated as the Facial
angle.
The mean value for the series was 87.8. The range was from 82°
representing a recessive chin approaching the facial type usually associated
with Class IT malocclusion to 95° indieating a protrusive chin.Vol. XIX, No. 3 FACIAL VARIATION 147
ee
y ~