Lesson 1 Educational Paradigm Shift
Lesson 1 Educational Paradigm Shift
Course Outcomes:
● Explain how the change of emphasis from content to outcomes in education led
to the shift of focus in teaching from the subject matter to the learner; (P.O.C.c);
(P.O.D.d); (P.O.E.c)
INTRODUCTION
Before attending the synchronous class, be sure that you have either seen the video in
YouTube at the link https://youtu.be/VWhZuckdqRs or you have read the article by
Macayan, M. (2017). Implementing outcome-based education (OBE) framework:
Implications for assessment of students’ performance. Educational Measurement and
Evaluation Review, 8 (1). Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321797050_Implementing_Outcome-
Based_Education_OBE_Framework_Implications_for_Assessment_of_Students
%27_Performance
I. CAPTIVATE
In class and with your small group, using a Jamboard participate in the pre-discussion activity
by answering the following questions:
In this lesson, you will learn the principles involved in outcomes-based education. In the
past, the educational set-up was focused on teacher as the center of the whole process.
Teachers spend more time giving inputs to their students. They were focused on covering a lot
of content. Also, they viewed teaching learning activities as an end — so they put emphasis on
their students’ outputs.
However, because of globalization and the need for these graduates to adapt to the
changing demands of the industries, not to mention their mobility as well as international
accreditation requirements, the educational landscape has shifted from the traditional paradigm
to the use of the outcomes-based framework.
Education now must answer two important questions: 1) what do education institutions
want their students to become or to be able to do?; and 2) how are these students helped to
achieve their expected outcomes?
What is an outcome?
This is the same concept we are seeing in the diagram above. In the picture, the dart
board, which is the target is the goal or outcome, while the darts are all the designed teaching
learning activities that will be activated in order to hit the targets. So if the outcomes are not
clearly spelled out, all activities may not directly hit the targets which may result in wasted time,
energy and resources. Careful planning and execution are the key to a successful OBE-
implementation. In other words, the “everything” in Spady’s definition, which includes all
aspects in the educational process such as curriculum, resources such as classroom, curricular
and extra-curricular activities need to be aligned with the projected outcomes of the learners.
Therefore, to simply put it, before any teaching-learning activity is started, the teacher
must first set the outcomes that he intends his learners to manifest — thus, the saying, “begin
with the end in mind”. This is the guiding principle of an outcomes-based education.
There are two types of outcomes, namely, intermediate outcomes and deferred
outcomes (Navarro, Santos, & Corpuz, 2019). Intermediate outcomes, also referred to as
instructional outcomes, are the qualities, competencies and skills that the graduates have
achieved after finishing either a program, course, or learning outcomes. Some of the examples
would be: ability to solve mathematical problems, competence in speaking and writing, or ability
to do research project. On the other hand, deferred outcomes are those abilities,
competencies or skills that the graduates may have achieved or acquired several years after
completing the degree or program.
Institutional Outcomes
Institutional outcomes are statements that express what the graduates of a certain
institution are expected to become after graduation. It is supposed that any educational
institution will have set their expectations from their graduates, that is why these institutions
create their mission-vision. Mission-vision statements serve as the institutions’ guidepost.
These statements dictate all other plans and activities that the university will design. Moreover,
schools must also create their graduate attributes. Graduate attributes are the outcomes that
the institutions have created to reflect the qualities, skills, and understandings they expect from
their graduates to develop. These go beyond academic expertise or technical knowledge
(Bowden, Hart, King, Trigwell & Watts, 2000). These may also reflect the kind of brand the
university wants for itself.
Program Outcomes
While the institutional outcomes are the bigger statements of the entire institution’s
expectations from all their graduates regardless of degrees or programs, the program outcomes
are specific to the particular degree. These are statements that express the students’ outcomes
after completing a certain degree or program. Specific discussion on program outcomes is
tackled in the succeeding lesson.
Course Outcomes
Course or subject outcomes are more specific than the program outcomes. These are
statements that indicate what the students’ should be able to do or perform after taking a
specific course or subject.
Learning Outcomes
Learning or instructional outcomes are these statements that explain what the students
can do after a specific lesson or topic.
According to Spady (1994), if these four operating principles are followed consistently by
the educators and academic leaders, the implementation of outcomes-based education could
be a success.
a. Clarity of focus. All educators must be aware of the outcomes of each student and
be able to translate these at the classroom level while being guided by the the higher outcomes
such as the program and institutional level. Also, in achieving the classroom level outcomes,
teachers must refer to the learning outcomes so that appropriate assessment tasks and
teaching-learning activities are consciously designed. This alignment is called constructive
alignment.
b. High expectations. In designing assessment tasks that target the higher level
outcomes, teachers must design measures that activate higher order thinking skills and are
authentic or highly reflective of the real-life scenarios. This may be done through
demonstration, simulations, or performance assessments to name a few. In so doing, students
are then prepared for actual work life.
c. Expanded opportunity. As explained by Spady (1994, p.9), all students can learn
and succeed, but not on the same day, in the same way” that is why teachers need to provide
expanded opportunity for students to profess or demonstrate the earning outcomes. This
expanded opportunity may include the time dimension, whereby the students may be allowed to
do remedial, make-up or practice tests. Also, the mode in which the assessment tasks is given
may be diversified. This is when teachers may consider the varied learning or thinking styles of
their students, as well as the multiple intelligences. Teachers may be reminded by Einstein’s
statement, “Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live
its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
After knowing these key concepts of outcomes-based education, be engaged with these
activities to further your understanding.
A. With the same groups as earlier identified, complete the matrix below by comparing the
ROLE of the teacher in the traditional set-up and in the outcomes-based education set-
up. Be ready to explain your answers.
B. List down three course outcomes that you think you would have acquired after taking this
course, Assessment in Learning 1. Be able to explain your answers.
1. Pick out PO 14 & PO 16. Comment on how the statements are phrased in relation to
what you expect the program will hone/mold you to become.
2. Pick out CO 1. Comment on how the statement is phrased and how it is aligned to the
program outcomes identified.
3. Pick out ILO 1 & 3. Comment on how the statements are phrased and how they are
aligned to the course outcomes.
Program Outcomes:
PO 14: ______________________________________________________________________
PO 16: ______________________________________________________________________
Comment:___________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
Course Outcomes:
CO 1: ______________________________________________________________________
Comment:___________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
Intended Learning Outcomes:
ILO 1: ______________________________________________________________________
ILO 3: ______________________________________________________________________
Comment:___________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
4. Comment on the alignment among the ILOs, Teaching-Learning Activities (TLA), and the
Assessment Tasks (AT).
Comment:___________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
Online Quiz (Supply-type of test) for this lesson. Answer comprehensively with no more than 4
sentences per question. Anything beyond the 4th sentence will no longer be considered as your
answer. Rubric for rating (3 pts- content, 2 pts - correct language use)
Supplemental Reading:
References:
Bowden, J., Hart, G., King, B., Trigwell, K., & Watts, O. (2000). Generic capabilities of
ATN university graduates. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education, Training
and Youth Affairs. http://www.clt.uts.edu.au/atn.grad. cap.project.index.html