Class 8 - 9 - Process Analysis
Class 8 - 9 - Process Analysis
Arijit Mitra
PROCESS STRATEGY
• How an organization approaches process selection is determined by the
organization’s Process Strategy
• Key Aspects of Process Strategy:
• Capital Intensity
• The mix of equipment and labor that will be used by the organization
• Process flexibility
• The degree to which the system can be adjusted to changes in processing
requirements due to such factors as
• Product and service design changes
• Volume changes
• Changes in technology
PROCESS SELECTION
• Process selection – It refers to deciding on the way
production of goods or services will be organized
Job
Shop
The Trade-off Continuum
High Flexibility Lower Flexibility &
and High unit cost Lower unit cost
Job Shop Batch Assembly Line Continuous
Description Customized goods or Semi-standardized Standardized goods Highly standardized
services goods or services or services Goods or services
Advantages Able to handle a wide Flexibility; easy to add Low unit cost, high Very efficient, very high
variety of work or change products or volume, efficient volume
services
Disadvantages Slow, high cost per unit, Moderate cost per unit, Low flexibility, high Very rigid, lack of
complex planning and moderate scheduling, cost of downtime variety, costly to
scheduling complexity change, very high cost
of downtime
MOVEMENT ALONG THE PP MATRIX:
HOOK AND SHIE STRATEGY
The same company, over a period, may move along the diagonal of the product
process matrix from low-volume to high-volume and may focus more on
standardization! Example - FORD
Japanese way of
thinking
CONCEPT – 2 - PUSH/PULL PROCESS
Processes fall into push and pull depending on times of execution and customer demand
• Pull: Execution is initiated in response to a customer order (Reactive)
• Push: Execution is initiated in anticipation of customer orders (Speculative)
• The Push-Pull boundary - Decoupling Point
• At this point, the Product Postponement happens
• Product Postponement – Keeping the product in generic form by delaying the further investment / process until
the last possible moment
• Point of Discretization – When Liquid or gas is changed to solid (in case of steel etc.). It generally becomes a
decoupling point where postponement take place
CONCEPT – 3 - PROCESSES ACCORDING TO LEAD TIME
• Engineer to Order (ETO) – Design will be started after the customer order
• Make-to-order (MTO)
• Only activated in response to an actual order
• Both work-in-process and finished goods inventory kept to a minimum
• Assemble to Order (ATO) – Parts will be stocked, but assembly will be done after customer order
• Make-to-stock (MTS)
• Process activated to meet expected or forecast demand
• Customer orders are served from target stocking level
SANDWICH EXAMPLE: THE STORY OF THREE SANDWICHES
Buy RM Prepare Components Final Assembly Sell Product
One-of-a-kind Dagwood
CONNECTING ALL THREE CONCEPTS
Demand is Less than Process Capacity Demand is More than Process Capacity
Resource Station 1 Station 2 Station Units Resource Station Station Station Units
3 1 2 3
Processing Times (PT) 37 46 37 Sec/unit Processing Times (PT) 37 46 37 Sec/unit
Capacity of each process 0.02703 0.02174 0.02703 Units/sec Capacity of each process 0.02703 0.02174 0.02703 Units/sec
(1 / PT) (1 / PT)
Capacity of each process 97.297 78.261 97.297 Units/hr. Capacity of each process 97.297 78.261 97.297 Units/hr.
per hr. per hr.
Bottleneck Process X Bottleneck Process X
Utilization of each station 61.67% 76.67% 61.67% Utilization of each station 82.22% 100% 82.22%
= Flow rate / Capacity = Flow rate / Capacity
Inventory
- Sitting in front of the restaurant as an
(WIP)
observer……
Flow Time
- 25 minutes later
Or,
Or,
Demand is Less than Process Capacity Demand is More than Process Capacity
Resource Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Units Resource Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Units
Capacity of each process 0.02703 0.02174 0.02703 Units/sec Capacity of each process 0.02703 0.02174 0.02703 Units/sec
(1 / PT) (1 / PT)
Capacity of each process 97.297 78.261 97.297 Units/hr. Capacity of each process 97.297 78.261 97.297 Units/hr.
per hr. per hr.
Bottleneck Process X Bottleneck Process X
Utilization of each station 61.67% 76.67% 61.67% Utilization of each station 82.22% 100% 82.22%
= Flow rate / Capacity = Flow rate / Capacity
Flow rate = 60 60 60 Units/hr. Flow rate = 78.261 78.261 78.261 Units/hr.
min { Demand, Capacity} min { Demand, Capacity}
Cycle Time = 1 / Flow 60 Sec/Unit Cycle Time = 1 / Flow 46 Sec/Unit
Rate Rate
Flow Time (MLT) 37 + 46 + 37 = 120 Sec/Unit Flow Time (MLT) 37 + 46 + 37 = 120 Sec/Unit
1. Indirect measurement of flow time: how long does it take you on average to respond to
an email? Given are:
• You write 60 email responses per day
• You have 240 emails in your inbox
A production process at Kenneth Day Manufacturing is shown in the figure below. The drilling operation occurs separately
from, and simultaneously with, sawing and sanding, which are independent and sequential operations. A product needs to
go through only one of the three assembly operations (the operations are in parallel).
1. Which operation is the bottleneck?
2. What is the bottleneck time?
3. What is the throughput time (MLT) of the overall system?
4. What is the average WIP in the system?
5. If the firm operates 8 hours per day, 20 days per month, what is the monthly capacity of the manufacturing process?
Revisit Problem – 2 with Little’s Law
Cleaning
5 min/unit
• Reduce interruptions
• Add resource
CAPACITY & PROCESS ANALYSIS: A PROBLEM
Bread Fill
15 sec/sandwich 20 sec/sandwich
Wrap/
Order Toaster
Deliver
30 sec/sandwich 20 sec/sandwich
Bread Fill 37.5 sec/sandwich
15 sec/sandwich 20 sec/sandwich