Tauc Plot
Tauc Plot
Size-dependent energy band gap and dielectric constant within the generalized Penn model applied to a
semiconductor nanocrystallite
J. Appl. Phys. 100, 084301 (2006); 10.1063/1.2357421
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
138.5.159.110 On: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:30:52
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS 117, 125701 (2015)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
138.5.159.110 On: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:30:52
125701-2 Feng et al. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 125701 (2015)
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2m E 2m ðV0 EÞ states. In fact, most absorption measurements are performed
k¼ ; j¼ : (3) for a collection of large amount of nanocrystals, instead of a
h2 h2
single one. For realistic nanocrystal dispersions, discrete
The coefficients, A and B, are determined by the conti- energy levels have small spacings and usually get smeared
nuity of the wave function and the normalization condition. due to a small degree of size non-uniformity. Assuming a
Here, we only discuss the confined states, (E < V0 ). The con- quasi-continuous spectrum, the accumulated number of
dition of logarithmic derivative gives quantized eigen- states nlm ðvÞ (for specified quantum numbers l and m) can be
energies. For practically fabricated nanocrystals, the radius R solved from the continuous version of (7)
and the barrier height V0 are sufficiently large to have
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ð1Þ dnlm 1 1 1
2m V0 R h, so that jl ðkRÞ and hl ðijRÞ may be replaced ¼ ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi þ 1 : (10)
by their asymptotic forms. In fact, the barrier height V0 is dv Dv p u2 v2
normally of the order of 10 eV, and the radius R is of the
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
order of 10 nm; this provides 2m V0 R 102 h. The asymp- Substituting the dimensionless integration variable, dv, by
totic forms of the spherical Bessel and Hankel functions are the energy interval, d, we integrate (10) over energy
expressed by trigonometric functions,
nlm ðEÞ nlm ðE0 Þ ¼ PðEÞ PðE0 Þ; (11)
1 lþ1
jl ðkRÞ cos kR p ; where E is the current energy level and E0 is the ground-
kR 2 state energy (for a specified quantum number l). The func-
(4)
ð 1Þ 1 lþ1 tion P(E) is defined by the integration
hl ðijRÞ exp jR p :
jR 2 ð E rffiffiffiffiffiffi
m R d 1
PðEÞ¢ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi þ 1
The continuity condition of the logarithmic derivative, 0 2 h p u2 v2
8 9
< " pffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi# sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2 =
ð Þ 1 V0 V0 E 8m R E
1 djl ðkrÞ 1 hl 1 ðijr Þ ¼ 4 tan1 pffiffiffi þ :
¼ ; (5) 2p : h2 ;
jl ðkRÞ dr r¼R hð1Þ ðijRÞ dr r¼R E
(12)
is written in terms of the asymptotic forms
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Since the ground-state energy E0 corresponds to the first so-
kRcotðkRÞ ¼ u2 ðkRÞ2 ; (6) lution v0 of (6), we can safely assume v0
u, which after
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi some algebraic manipulation approximates Eq. (12) to
where the dimensionless parameter u¢ 2m V0 R=h. n hpffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi i o
1
Equation (6) is used to solve the short-wavelength limits of PðE0 Þ ¼ 4 tan1 cot2 v0 þ 1 cotv0 þ 2v0
eigenenergies for a specified angular quantum number l. 2p
Before discussing on the density of the corresponding eigen- 1 1
4 ðp v0 Þ þ 2v0 ¼ 1 : (13)
states in a finite-size spherical particle, let us define dimen- 2p 2
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
sionless parameters v¢kR and f ðvÞ¢ ðu=vÞ2 1. Substituting (13) into (11) and noticing that the accumulated
Supposing vn and vnþ1 are two successive solutions of (6), af- number of states at the first node (E0) is always equal to 1,
ter some algebraic manipulation we have we obtain n0m ðEÞ PðEÞ whose validity relies on the as-
ymptotic form.4 As we are only interested in energy levels
f ðvnþ1 Þ f ðvn Þ ¼ ½cotðvnþ1 Þ cotðvn þ pÞ: (7) well below the barrier height (i.e., deeply bounded states,
where E
V0 ),pthe ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffifirst
ffi term of (12)
pffiffiffiis negligible. In this
The first-order approximation of (7) is case, PðEÞ 2k m E, where k¢R= 2ph. Accordingly, the
density of states for a specified set of quantum numbers
f 0 ½ðvnþ1 þ vn Þ=2ðvnþ1 vn Þ ¼ csc2 ½ðvnþ1 þ vn Þ=2 (l and m) is
ðvnþ1 vn pÞ: (8) rffiffiffiffiffiffi
dPðEÞ m
q0 ðÞ ¼ k : (14)
Substituting (6) into (8) gives rise to the expression for the dE E¼
interval of neighboring states in the space spanned by the
dimensionless parameter v Equation (14) illustrates the state distribution for a
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi specified set of quantum numbers in the asymptotic regime
2 ( is large enough to have kR 1). To obtain a total state
p u2 ðvnþ1 þ vn Þ=2
Dvn ¢vnþ1 vn ¼ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2 : (9) distribution, stationary states with all possible angular
u2 ðvnþ1 þ vn Þ=2 þ 1 momenta need to be counted. According to the asymptotic
form shown in (4), jl ðkRÞ is a periodic function with respect
In this paper, we assume a quasi-continuous absorption to l, if kR 1, i.e., jl ðkRÞ ¼ jl4 ðkRÞ. This implies that the
spectrum in the energy range of consideration due to a vari- difference in their accumulated numbers of states
ety of smearing mechanisms. This assumption allows us to [Pl ðEÞ Pl4 ðEÞ] is a constant in the asymptotic regime.
derive a continuous function for the density of electronic The property of the Bessel functions tells us that this
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
138.5.159.110 On: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:30:52
125701-3 Feng et al. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 125701 (2015)
constant is equal to 2.11 This means that (5) has less nodes in integral, h/k0 l0 m0 j/klm i, can be evaluated by substituting elec-
the regime, where the asymptotic form (4) is not yet valid tronic bound states, j/klm i ¼ RðrÞYlm ðh; uÞ, where the radial
(kR 1), if reducing l to l – 4. part R(r) is given by Eq. (2)
For states with a zero angular momentum (l ¼ 0), the ðR
accumulated number of states, n0m ðEÞ, is completely deter- h/k0 l0 m0 j/klm i ¼ AA0 r2 jl0 ðk0 rÞjl ðkrÞdr
mined by (14), and it is possible to integrate it from the 0
ground state energy, E0, of the nanocrystal. Noted that ð p ð 2p
n0m ðE0 Þ ¼ 1. After determining the number of states with Yl0 m0 ðh; uÞYlm ðh; uÞ sin hdudh;
0 0
l ¼ 0, we can obtain the number of states contributed by posi-
(20)
tive angular quantum numbers using the relation
l l where A and A0 are the respective normalization factors for
nlm ðEÞ ¼ n0m ðEÞ ¼ PðEÞ : (15) the state j/klm i and j/k0 l0 m0 i.
2 2
Due to the orthogonal property of the spherical harmon-
Taking into account, the energy degeneracy of the magnetic ics, the angle-dependent integral in (20) is equal to dl;l0 dm;m0
quantum number, m, the total accumulated number of states, (Kronecker d-function), while the integration in the radial
N(E), and the corresponding density of states, N 0 ðEÞ part is evaluated using the identity properties of Bessel
¼ dNðEÞ=dE, are functions
ð EÞ
ðR
X
2P
N ð EÞ ¼ ð2l þ 1Þnlm ðEÞ r 2 jl0 ðk0 rÞjl ðkrÞdr
0
l¼0
k0 R2
N 0 ðEÞ ¼ QðEÞq0 ðEÞ; (17) jl0 ðk0 RÞ jl1 ðkRÞ jlþ1 ðkRÞ : (21)
ð 2
2 k k 02 Þ
where q0 ðEÞ is expressed by (14), and the function Q(E) is
Substituting the asymptotic forms of the Bessel functions4
defined by
into (21),
1 ðR
QðEÞ ¢ 4P2 ðEÞ þ 2PðEÞ þ : (18)
6 r 2 jl0 ðk0 rÞjl ðkrÞdr
0
1 sin½ ðk k0 ÞR sin½ ðk þ k0 ÞR lp
III. INTERBAND ABSORPTION IN NANOCRYSTALS
2kk0 k k0 k þ k0
To evaluate the absorption profile, the matrix elements sin½ ðk k ÞR0
of the light perturbing Hamiltonian mq A p^ are to be calcu- : (22)
2kk0 ðk k0 Þ
lated first. Here, q and m denote the charge and mass of a
^ is the
free electron, A is the vector potential of light, and p It is noted that both approximations are valid, if kR 1 and
momentum operator for electron. In the framework of effec- k0 R 1. For a normalized wave function, the probability
tive mass approximation (or envelop function approximation within the sphere shall equal to unity. Substituting (22) into
equivalently), the actual electron wave function, U, within 2
R=2k2 ¼ 1. This leads to the
(20), we have h/klm j/klm i ¼pAffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
the nanocrystal can be decomposed into the product of a normalization factor A ¼ k 2=R. Finally, the general form
fast-varying Bloch wave, w, and a slow-varying envelop of the inner product h/k0 l0 m0 j/klm i is expressed by
function / [the eigenfunction solved in (1)]. This decompo-
sition allows evaluation of the perturbation matrix elements sin½ ðk k0 ÞR
h/k0 l0 m0 j/klm i ¼ dl;l0 dm;m0 : (23)
using the following scheme: ðk k 0 ÞR
D q E h q
Back to the absorption problem, the band-to-band transi-
Uk0 l0 m0 A p
^ Uklm ¼ A ðhwjwih/k0 l0 m0 jr/klm i
m im tion rate CðÞ associated with a specified photon energy,
þ hwjrwih/k0 l0 m0 j/klm iÞ; (19) þ Eg , is expressed below, following the perturbation theory
ð ð X
where k is the wave-vector defined in (3), while l and m 2p
C ð Þ ¼ dc dv qclm ðc Þqvl0m0 ðv Þ
denote the integers of spherical harmonics, or equivalently h 0 0 0
lm;l m 0
the angular quantum number and the magnetic quantum D q E2
number following the terminology in atomic physics. The Uk0 l0 m0 A p^ Uklm dðc þ v Þ; (24)
m
vector potential, A, has negligible variation over the dimen-
sion of the nanocrystal, due to the long wavelength of light where c and v are the excess photon energy, , distributed
(1 lm). Since /klm varies much slower than wn (i.e., to the conduction band and to the valence band, respectively.
jr/klm j
jrwj), the first term in (19) is negligible com- The energy conservation law gives rise to the Dirac d-func-
pared to the second term. In the second term, the overlap tion dðc þ v Þ, which is part of the Fermi’s golden rule.
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
138.5.159.110 On: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:30:52
125701-4 Feng et al. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 125701 (2015)
qclm ðc Þ and qvlm ðv Þ are the respective densities of states in Two extreme cases of (29) are considered here, corre-
the conduction band and in the valence band for a given set sponding to a 3D bulk semiconductor and a 0D (ultra small)
of l and m. They are given by (14) only within the asymptotic semiconductor dot.
regime (kR 1). Since k and k0 are the wave-vectors of Case I: A bulk semiconductor corresponds to the limit
conduction-band electrons and valence-band holes, respec- that the radius of the nanocrystal becomes infinite (R ! 1).
tively, they are replaced by more systematic symbols kc and At this limit, we have
kv. According to (3), they are defined by
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sin2 ½ ðkc kv ÞR pdðkc kv Þ
lim ¼
2me c 0 2mh v R!1 ðkc kv Þ2 R2 R
kc ¢k ¼ 2
; kv ¢k ¼ ; (25) pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffi
h h2 ph 2me mh
¼ dðc c0 Þ: (31)
where me and mh are the respective effective masses of elec-
3
Rðme þ mh Þ2
trons and holes. Now substituting (19) and (23) into (24),
ð The d-function in (31) corresponds to the direct transition in
2phq2 0 2 bulk semiconductors (i.e., an electron being excited from the
C ð Þ ¼ jA hw jrwij dc Njoint ðc ; c Þ
m2 0 valence band to the conduction band with its crystal momen-
sin2 ½ ðkc kv ÞR tum being conserved). Substituting (31) into the general tran-
; (26) sition rate expression (29),
ðkc kv Þ2 R2
pffiffiffi
where the joint number of states Njoint ðc ; c Þ is defined 2pAhme mh pffiffi
lim CðÞ ¼ 3 : (32)
by R!1 Rðme þ mh Þ2
X
Njoint ðc ; c Þ¢ qclm ðc Þqvlm ð c Þ Case II: At the 0D limit, the nanocrystal radius R ! 0. The
lm trigonometric term in (29) has infinitely slow variation. Its limit
¼ minfQc ðc Þ; Qv ð c Þgqc0 ðc Þqv0 ð c Þ:
sin2 ½ ðkc kv ÞR
(27) lim ¼ 1: (33)
R!0 ðkc kv Þ2 R2
Defined by (14), the functions qc0 ðc Þ and qv0 ðv Þ share the
same form except for their respective effective masses. In a This result implies that unlike bulk materials, the transitions
similar way, Qc ðc Þ and Qv ðv Þ are both defined by (18), which occurring in 0D dots do not necessarily follow the condition
characterise the “energy distributions” of spherical harmonics of crystal momentum conservation. In fact, the effect of this
in the conduction band and in the valence band, respectively. selection rule is completely eliminated. The total transition
The monotonic function, Fðc Þ ¼ Qc ðc Þ Qv ð c Þ, has rate at the 0D limit is
only one zero crossing within the regime ð0; Þ. If we denote
lim CðÞ
this particular energy by c0 ; CðÞ, it can be evaluated sepa- R!0
2 0sffiffiffiffiffiffi1 0sffiffiffiffiffiffi1 3
rately via two integrations: ½0; c0 and ½c0 ; .
As we are interested only in energies, E, that are large 6 me A mh A pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
7
¼ A4mh tan1 @ þ me tan1 @ me mh 5:
enough to fall into the asymptotic regime (kR 1), P(E) is mh me
also much larger than unity so only the highest-order term is
required in (18). Therefore, QðÞ 4P2 ðÞ ð4kÞ2 m , (34)
which gives
According to Case I and Case II, at the two extreme cases
m (R ! 1 and R ! 0), the total transition rate obeys the form of
c0 ¼ h : (28) a power law, which forms the basis of Tauc plot extrapolation
me þ mh
ð þ Eg Það þ Eg Þ / CðÞ / n ; (35)
The total transition rate shown in (26) is then evaluated to be
( ð rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 2 where the total energy of photon, þ Eg , is decomposed into
c0
c sin ½ ðkc kv ÞR
C ð Þ ¼ A m e dc a bandgap energy, Eg, and an excess carrier kinetic energy, .
0 c ðk c k v Þ2 R 2 aðEÞ is the absorption coefficient of nanocrystals at energy E
ð rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi )
c sin2 ½ ðkc kv ÞR and n denotes a constant power factor (Tauc factor). At the
þ mh dc ; (29) bulk limit (R ! 1), the Tauc factor n degenerates to its
c0 c ðkc kv Þ2 R2 standard value 1/2, while at the 0D limit n is increased to 1.
Except for the two extreme cases, generally the total
where transition rate CðÞ expressed in (29) does not have the form
shown in (35). However, for energies at the vicinity of the
4 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 2pc
2
A ¼ ð2kÞ me mh ; band edge, (35) can be used to approximate the energy de-
h
2 (30) pendence described by (29) and (1). The remaining task is to
hq find the most appropriate Tauc factor, n, which yield a suffi-
c2 ¼ jA hwjrwij2 :
m ciently small discrepancy between (35) and (29).
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
138.5.159.110 On: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:30:52
125701-5 Feng et al. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 125701 (2015)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
138.5.159.110 On: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:30:52
125701-6 Feng et al. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 125701 (2015)
the maximum error of adopting the power law occurs at the bulk material, as long as a power factor of one half is
QD diameter of around 0.4 nm [Fig. 2(a)]. At such a diameter adopted. However, this bandgap value is an incorrect overes-
the fitted power factor demonstrates a local minimum, which timation and therefore cannot be used to determine the blue-
is believed to be due to the inaccuracy of the power law, i.e., shifted bandgap value quantitatively. In fact, both Figs. 2
10% deviation from the exact formula (29). Generally, the and 3 demonstrate incorrect orders of bandgap values, for
transition of the power factor should show a monotonous trend one should expect a monotonous decrease of bandgap value
from unity to one half with the NC diameter. with the size of QD.
As a direct-gap chalcogenide material, Ag2S NC From a theoretical point of view, although the first con-
recently attracts the interest of chemists due to its simplicity fined level is usually elevated, resulting in an increase of the
of wet-chemistry synthesis. Recent experiments and calcula- absorption edge, one needs to note that Tauc plot is in fact
tions both confirm it has an optical band gap of around an extrapolation technique that utilizes the trend of absorp-
1.0 eV.13–15 Fig. 3(d) clearly shows an overestimation of the tion coefficient in the quasi-continuous spectrum regime.
Tauc fitted band gap, if 1 is used as the Tauc factor. The Therefore, it relates to the state distribution, where the dis-
underestimation with a Tauc factor of 1/2 [Fig. 3(c)] is rela- crete energy spectrum becomes quasi-continuous. With
tively not so convincing. But this causes a significant degra- appropriate smoothing, the general trend of density of states
dation of its linearity, as the measured absorption curves in nanocrystals does not vary from their bulk counterparts,
show obvious convex features. The band gap values fitted by instead the momentum selection rule of optical transitions is
Tauc plot with different power factors are listed In Table I partly relaxed. This argument supports the point that Tauc
for both NC materials. The optimized power factors result in plot could only be used to extrapolate the bulk band gap for
values that perfectly match the confirmed optical band gaps. direct-band-gap materials.
Interestingly, the Tauc plots used here retrieve the opti- To further illustrate this point, we consider the effect of
cal band gap of the respective bulk materials, and do not ex- carrier effective masses to the optical transition rate.
plicitly demonstrate blue shift attributed by quantum According to (29), the general form of direct-allowed optical
confinement. In fact, despite the fact that quantum confine- transition rate only depends on the ratio of the two effective
ment leads to blue shift on the absorption edge, using Tauc masses (i.e., me =mh ) except for a constant factor. This
plot extrapolation to determine the elevated bandgap value is implies that if we increase the two effective masses simulta-
completely misleading. According to Figs. 2(c) and 3(c), the neously while conserving their ratio, the relation between the
extrapolated energy is well above the band gap energy of the excess photon energy and the transition rate does not vary;
while in this case, the first confined level red shifts. This sup-
TABLE I. Comparison of Tauc plots with different values of the factor n. ports the argument that Tauc extrapolation is not capable of
finding the first confined energy level.
Tauc fitted band gaps (in unit of eV)
V. CONCLUSION
NC
material Optimal power factor Optimal n ¼ 1/2 n¼1 In summary, we have formulated the direct-allowed opti-
SnO2 0.80 (3.6 nm) – 0.82 (3.0 nm) 3.9 4.3 3.7
cal transition in semiconductor nanocrystals, as well as provid-
Ag2S 0.64 (5.3 nm) – 0.66 (6.8 nm) 0.99 1.03 0.88 ing a solid theoretical support of using Tauc plot extrapolation
with a proper power factor. Observed in this work, the power
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
138.5.159.110 On: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:30:52
125701-7 Feng et al. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 125701 (2015)
5
factor undergoes a size-dependent transition from one half in J. I. Pankove, Optical Processes in Semiconductors (Courier Dover
bulk semiconductors to one in ultra-small particles. By adopt- Publications, 2012).
6
P. Ardalan, T. P. Brennan, H.-B.-R. Lee, J. R. Bakke, I.-K. Ding, M. D.
ing the size-dependent power factor in extrapolation, a better McGehee, and S. F. Bent, “Effects of self-assembled monolayers on solid-
linearity and more consistent and accuracy bandgap value can state CdS quantum dot sensitized solar cells,” ACS Nano 5, 1495–1504
be retrieved, which allows us to characterize the material com- (2011).
7
P. Praus, O. Kozak, K. Kočı, A. Panaček, and R. Dvorsk
y, “CdS nanopar-
position of nanocrystals more accurately. However, for direct-
ticles deposited on montmorillonite: Preparation, characterization and
band-gap materials, the Tauc plot technique should not be used application for photoreduction of carbon dioxide,” J. Colloid Interface Sci.
to quantitatively determine the blueshift of bandgap value due 360, 574–579 (2011).
8
to quantum confinement effect. S. Park, E. Cho, D. Song, G. Conibeer, and M. A. Green, “n-Type silicon
quantum dots and p-type crystalline silicon heteroface solar cells,” Sol.
Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93, 684–690 (2009).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 9
J.-W. Lee, D.-Y. Son, T. K. Ahn, H.-W. Shin, I. Y. Kim, S.-J. Hwang, M.
J. Ko, S. Sul, H. Han, and N.-G. Park, “Quantum-dot-sensitized solar cell
This program has been supported by the Australian
with unprecedentedly high photocurrent,” Sci. Rep. 3, 1050 (2013).
Government through the Australian Renewable Energy 10
L. D. Landau and L. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics Non-Relativistic
Agency (ARENA). Responsibility for the views, Theory, 3rd ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1981), Vol. 3.
11
information, or advice expressed herein is not accepted by T. L. Chow, Mathematical Methods for Physicists (Cambridge University,
United Kingdom, 2000).
the Australian Government. This work was also supported 12
H. Tada, A. Hattori, Y. Tokihisa, K. Imai, N. Tohge, and S. Ito, “A pat-
by NSW Government through the Science Leverage Fund. terned-TiO2/SnO2 bilayer type photocatalyst,” J. Phys. Chem. B 104,
4585–4587 (2000).
1 13
V. Srikant and D. R. Clarke, “On the optical band gap of zinc oxide,” T. G. Schaaff and A. J. Rodinone, “Preparation and characterization of sil-
J. Appl. Phys. 83, 5447–5451 (1998). ver sulfide nanocrystals generated from silver (i)-thiolate polymers,”
2
T. Tansley and C. Foley, “Optical band gap of indium nitride,” J. Appl. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 10416–10422 (2003).
14
Phys. 59, 3241–3244 (1986). M. C. Brelle, J. Z. Zhang, L. Nguyen, and R. K. Mehra, “Synthesis and
3
W. Yim, E. Stofko, P. Zanzucchi, J. Pankove, M. Ettenberg, and S. ultrafast study of cysteine- and glutathione-capped Ag2S semiconductor
Gilbert, “Epitaxially grown AlN and its optical band gap,” J. Appl. Phys. colloidal nanoparticles,” J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 10194–10201 (1999).
15
44, 292–296 (1973). R. Vogel, P. Hoyer, and H. Weller, “Quantum-sized PbS, CdS, Ag2S,
4
J. Tauc, “Optical properties and electronic structure of amorphous Ge and Sb2S3, and Bi2S3 particles as sensitizers for various nanoporous wide-
Si,” Mater. Res. Bull. 3, 37–46 (1968). bandgap semiconductors,” J. Phys. Chem. 98, 3183–3188 (1994).
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
138.5.159.110 On: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:30:52