6.

4 Evaluation Rating Sheet for PRINT Resources

Title: _______________________________________________________________
ISBN: _____________________
Author(s): __________________________ Illustrators(s): ____________________
Publisher/Distributors(s): ______________________________________________
Copyright Year: _______________ Number of Pages _______________
Subject: ________________________________________
Intended for (Please check): Elem. (Primary) Elem. (Intermediate) High School

Instructions: Examine the material carefully and for each evaluation criterion consider the
extent to which the resource meets the criteria. Check the appropriate number [with 4 being
Very Satisfactory (VS); 3 – Satisfactory (S); 2 – Poor, and 1 – Not Satisfactory]. For a rating
below 4, write your comments/justifications on each evaluation criterion. If an evaluation
criterion is Not Applicable (NA), the material rated 3 on said criterion. Attach extra sheets if
necessary. Your report may be completed in soft or hard copy. Please write legibly if
completing hard copy.

Factor 1: Content VS S/NA Poor Not

Satisfactory
4 3 2 1

1. Content is suitable to the student’s level of

development

2. Material contributes to the achievement of

Specific objectives of the subject area and
grade/year level for which it is intended
3. Material provides for the development of
higher cognitive skills such as critical
thinking, creativity, learning by doing,
inquiry, problem solving, etc.
4. Material is free of ideological, cultural,
religious, racial, and gender biases and
prejudices
5. Material enhances the development of
desirable values and traits such as: (Put a
check mark only to the applicable values and
traits)
□ 5.1 Pride in being a Filipino □ 5.8 Honesty and Trustworthiness
□ 5.2 Scientific attitude and reasoning □ 5.9 Ability to know right from wrong
□ 5.3 Desire for excellence □ 5.10 Respect
□ 5.4 Love for country □ 5.11 Critical and creative thinking
□ 5.5 Helpfulness/Teamwork/Cooperation □ 5.12 Productive work
□ 5.6 Unity □ 5.13 Other: (Please specify)
□ 5.7 Desire to learn new things
6. Material has the potential to arouse interest
of target reader
7. Adequate warning/cautionary notes are
provided in topics and activities where
safety and health are concern
Total Points

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
 Note: Resources must score at least 21 points □ Passed
out of a maximum 28 points to pass this criterion. □ Failed
Please Put a check mark on the appropriate box

Factor 2: Format VS S/NA Poor Not

Satisfactory
4 3 2 1
1. Prints
1.1 Size of letters is appropriate to the intended user.

1.2 Spaces between letters and words facilitate reading

1.3 Font is easy to read

1.4 Printing is of good quality (i.e., no broken letters,

even density, correct alignment, properly placed screen
registration)
2. Illustrations
2.1 Simple and easily recognizable
2.2 Clarify and supplement the text
2.3 Properly labelled or captioned (if applicable)
2.4 Realistic / appropriate colors
2.5 Attractive and appealing
2.6 Culturally relevant
3. Design and Layout
3.1 Attractive and pleasing to look at
3.2 Simple (i.e., does not distract the attention of
the reader)
3.3 Adequate illustration in relation to text
3.4 Harmonious blending of elements (e.g.,
illustrations and text)
4. Paper and Binding
4.1 Paper used contributes to easy reading
4.2 Durable binding to withstand frequent use
5. Size and Weight of Resource
5.1 Easy to handle
3.2 Relatively light
Total Points
Note: Resources must score at least 54 points out □ Passed
of a maximum 72 points to pass this criterion. □ Failed
Please put a check mark on the appropriate box

Factor 3: Presentation and Organization VS S/NA Poor Not

Satisfactory
4 3 2 1
1. Presentation is engaging, interesting, and
understandable
2. There is a logical and smooth flow of ideas

3. Vocabulary level is adapted to target reader’s

likely experience and level of understanding

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
 4. Length of sentences is suited to the
comprehension level of the target reader
5. Sentences and paragraph structures are varied and
interesting to the target reader
Total Points

Note: Resource must score at least 15 points out of a □ Passed

maximum 20 points to pass this criterion. Please put a □ Failed
check mark on the appropriate box

Factor 4: Accuracy and Up-to- Not Present but Present & Poor
datedness of Information Presen very minor requires
t & must be major Do not
fixed redevelopmen evaluate
t further
3 1
4 2

1. Conceptual errors

2. Factual errors

3. Grammatical errors

4. Computational errors

5. Obsolete information

6. Typographical and other minor errors

(e.g., inappropriate or unclear
illustrations, missing labels, wrong
captions, etc.)
Total Points

Note: Resource must score at least 15 □ Passed

points out of a maximum 20 points to pass □ Failed – All issues must be documented
this criterion. Please put a check mark on
in the comments section.
the appropriate box
Other Comments
(Please write your comments and recommendations on the material not captured in Factors 1-4. Use additional sheet
if necessary)

Recommendation

Note: Any material that fails factor 4 must not be recommended for use in public schools
until the identified issues have been fixed
Any material that fails in at least one of the four factors of the evaluation rating should not
be recommended for possible use in public schools

(Please put a check mark (✓) in the appropriate box)

i. □ I/We recommended the approval of this material for possible use in public schools provided
that the corrections / revisions included in this report are made. (For commercial resources (non-
DepED owned resources) the Publisher must implement all recommended corrections / revisions
in their next printing or provide errata.)

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
ii. □ I/We do not recommend the approval of this material for possible use in public schools for the
reasons stated below and/or cited in this evaluation report. (Please use separate sheet if
necessary.)
(Please sign below and at the back of each page.)
I/We certify that this evaluation report and recommendation are my/our own and have been made without
any influence from others.
Evaluator(s): ____________________________ Signature(s): ______________________
Date: _______________________________

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
6.5 Evaluation Rating Sheet for Charts, Posters, Drill / flash Cards and Manipulative

Title:
Type:
Intended for: Grade/Year level(s): ________ Subject area(s): ____________________
Author(s): ____________________________________________________________
Publisher: ___________________________ Distributor / Supplier: ______________
Copyright year: _____________________________ No. of Pages: _______________

Instructions: Examine the material carefully and for each evaluation criterion consider the
extent to which the resource meets the criteria. Check the appropriate number [with 4 being
Very Satisfactory (VS); 3 – Satisfactory (S); 2 – Poor, and 1 – Not Satisfactory]. For a rating
below 4, write your comments/justifications on each evaluation criterion. If an evaluation
criterion is Not Applicable (NA), the material rated 3 on said criterion. Attach extra sheets if
necessary. Your report may be completed in soft or hard copy. Please write legibly if
completing hard copy.

Factor A: Content VS S/NA Poor Not

4 3 2 Satisfactory
1
1. Content reinforces, enriches, and, / or leads to the
mastery of certain learning competencies for the
level and subject it was intended
2. Material has the potential to arouse interest of the
target users
3. Facts are accurate

4. Information provided is up-to-date

5. Visuals are relevant to the text

6. Visuals are suitable to the age level and interest of

the target
7. Visuals are clear and adequately convey the
message of the subject or topic
8. Typographic layout / design facilities
understanding of concepts presented
9. Size of the material is appropriate for use in
school
10. Material is easy to use and durable

Total Points

Note: Resource must score at least 30 points out of a □ Passed

maximum 40 points to pass this criterion. Please put a □ Failed
check mark on the appropriate box

Factor B: Other Findings Not Present but Present & Poor

Presen very minor requires
t & must be major Do not
4 fixed redevelopmen evaluate
3 t further
1
2

1. Conceptual errors

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
 2. Factual errors

3. Grammatical and/or typographical

errors
4. Other errors (i.e., computational errors,
obsolete information, errors in the
visual, etc.)

Total Points

Note: Resource must score at least 16 □ Passed

points out of a maximum 26 points to pass □ Failed. All issues must be documented
this criterion. Please put a check mark on
in the Comments section
the appropriate box

Manipulative
Complete Evaluation for Factor A and B above as well as Factor C

Factor C: Additional requirements for VS S/NA Poor Not

Manipulative 4 3 2 Satisfactory
1
Instructional Design
1. Adequate support material is provided
2. Activities are summarized; extension activities are
provided
3. Suggested activities support innovative pedagogy

Technical Design
4. Manipulative is safe to use
5. Size and composition of manipulative is
appropriate for intended audience
6. Suggested manual tasks within the activities are
compatible with the motor skills of the intended
users
Total Points

Note: Resource must score at least 18 points out of a □ Passed

maximum 24 points to pass this criterion. Please put a □ Failed
check mark on the appropriate box

Other Comments

Recommendation

Note: Any material that fails factor B must not be recommended for use in public schools
until the identified issues have been fixed

(Please put a check mark (✓) in the appropriate box)

i. □ I/We recommended the approval of this material for possible use in public schools
provided that the corrections / revisions included in this report are made. (For commercial
resources (non-DepED owned resources) the Publisher must implement all recommended
corrections / revisions in their next printing or provide errata.)

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
ii. □ I/We do not recommend the approval of this material for possible use in public
schools for the reasons stated below and/or cited in this evaluation report. (Please use
separate sheet if necessary.)

(Please sign below and at the back of each page.)

I/We certify that this evaluation report and recommendation are my/our own and have been made
without any influence from others.

Evaluator(s): __________________________ Signature(s): ___________________

(Please print your full name)

Date: _______________________________

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
6.6 Evaluation Rating Sheet for Non-Print Materials

Type of Media (Please Check): □CD-ROM □VCD □DVD □VHS □Slides

□Transparencies □Cassette tape □Digital Interactive
□Others (please indicate) ______________________________
Title: ________________________________________________________________
Subject area(s): ___________________________ Grade/Year level: ______________
DepED Bureau/FAP: ________________________________________
Date of Publication: __________
Before completing this Evaluation any CD ROM, VCD or DVD of materials should be
viewed and the Technical Evaluation Section G (p72). Interoperability: Technical format
Checklists for conformance completed. This is to ensure that the format is compatible with
current playback devices and computer operating systems, software and plug-ins.

Instructions: Examine the material carefully and for each evaluation criterion consider the
extent to which the resource meets the criteria. Check the appropriate number [with 4 being
Very Satisfactory (VS); 3 – Satisfactory (S); 2 – Poor, and 1 – Not Satisfactory]. For a rating
below 4, write your comments/justifications on each evaluation criterion. If an evaluation
criterion is Not Applicable (NA), the material rated 3 on said criterion. Attach extra sheets if
necessary. Your report may be completed in soft or hard copy. Please write legibly if
completing hard copy.

Factor A: Content Quality VS S/NA Poor Not

4 3 2 Satisfactory
1
1. Content is consistent with topics/skills found in
the DepED Learning Competencies for the subject
and grade/year level it was intended
2. Concepts developed contribute to enrichment,
reinforcement, or mastery of the identified
learning objectives
3. Content is accurate

4. Content is up-to-date

5. Content is logically developed and organized

6. Content is free from cultural, gender, racial, or

ethnic bias
7. Content stimulates and promotes critical thinking

8. Content is relevant to real-life situations

9. Language (including vocabulary) is appropriate to

the target user level
10. Content promotes positive value that support
formative growth
Total Points

Note: Resource must score at least 30 points out of a □ Passed

maximum 40 points to pass this criterion. Please put a □ Failed
check mark on the appropriate box

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
 Factor B: Content Quality VS S/NA Poor Not
4 3 2 Satisfactory
1
1. Purpose of the material is well defined

2. Materials achieves its defined purpose

3. Learning objectives are clearly stated and

measureable
4. Level of difficulty is appropriate for the intended
target user
5. Graphics / colors / sounds are used for appropriate
instructional reasons
6. Material is enjoyable, stimulating, challenging,
and engaging
7. Material effectively stimulates creativity of target
user
8. Feedback on target user’s responses is effectively
employed
9. Target user can control the rate and sequence of
presentation and review
10. Instruction is integrated with target user’s
previous experience
Total Points

Note: Resource must score at least 30 points out of a □ Passed

maximum 40 points to pass this criterion. Please put a □ Failed
check mark on the appropriate box

Factor C: Technical Quality VS S/NA Poor Not

4 3 2 Satisfactory
1
1. Audio enhances understanding of the concept

2. Speech and narration (correct pacing, intonation,

and pronunciation) is clear and can be easily
understood
3. There is complete synchronization of audio with
the visuals, if any
4. Music and sound effects are appropriate and
effective for instructional purposes
5. Screen displays (text) are uncluttered, easy to
read, and aesthetically pleasing
6. Visual presentations (non-text) are clear and easy
to interpret
7. Visuals sustain interest and do not distract user’s
attention
8. Visuals provide accurate representation of the
concept discussed
9. The user support materials (if any) are effective

10. The design allows the target user to navigate

freely through the material
11. The material can easily and independently be used

Technical Evaluation: Complete Section G. Interoperability: Technical format Checklist

for conformance if not already completed prior to this review
12. The material will run using minimum system
requirements
13. The program is free from technical problems

Total Points

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
 Note: Resource must score at least 39 points out of a □ Passed
maximum 52 points to pass this criterion. Please put a □ Failed
check mark on the appropriate box

Factor D: Other Findings Not Present but Present & Poor

Presen very minor requires
Note down observations about the t & must be major Do not
information contained in the material, 4 fixed redevelopmen evaluate
where the following errors found: 3 t further
1
2

1. Conceptual errors

2. Factual errors

3. Grammatical and/or typographical

errors
4. Other errors (i.e., computational errors,
obsolete information, errors in the
visual, etc.)

Total Points

Note: Resource must score at least 16 □ Passed

points out of a maximum 16 points to pass □ Failed. All issues must be documented
this criterion. Please put a check mark on
in the Comments section
the appropriate box
Other Comments

Recommendation

Note: Any material that fails factor B must not be recommended for use in public schools
until the identified issues have been fixed

(Please put a check mark (✓) in the appropriate box)

i. □ I/We recommended the approval of this material for possible use in public schools
provided that the corrections / revisions included in this report are made. (For commercial
resources (non-DepED owned resources) the Publisher must implement all recommended
corrections / revisions in their next printing or provide errata.)
ii. □ I/We do not recommend the approval of this material for possible use in public
schools for the reasons stated below and/or cited in this evaluation report. (Please use
separate sheet if necessary.)

(Please sign below and at the back of each page.)

I/We certify that this evaluation report and recommendation are my/our own and have been made
without any influence from others.

Evaluator(s): __________________________ Signature(s): ___________________

(Please print your full name)
Date: _______________________________

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
6.7 Evaluation Rating Sheet for General Reference Materials

Title: _______________________________________________________________
Type: _____________________
Intended for: Grade/Year level(s): ________ Subject area(s): ____________________
Author(s)/Editors(s): ___________________________________________________
Publisher / Supplier: ____________________________________________________
Copyright year: ______________ No. of Pages: __________ ISBN: ______________

Instructions: Read the reference material carefully and rate it along each evaluation, criterion
by checking the appropriate number. 5 – Excellent, 4 - Very Satisfactory, 3 – Satisfactory, 2
– Fair, and 1 – Poor. If an evaluation criterion is Not Applicable (NA), the material rated 3 on
said criterion. For a rating below 4, cite specific examples and/or reasons for your rating.
Attach extra sheets if necessary. Your report may be completed in soft or hard copy. Please
write legibly if completing hard copy.

Factor A. Content E VS S F P
5 4 3 2 1
1. Content reinforces, enriches, and, / or leads to the mastery of
certain learning competencies for the level and subject it was
intended
2. Facts are accurate
3. Information is up-to-date
4. Language is appropriate for the level of the target user
5. Visuals are relevant to the text and suitable to the age level
and interest of the target
6. Visuals are clear in content and detail
7. Typographic layout / design adequately supports concepts
presented
8. Size of the letters is appropriate for the target user
Total Points
Note: Resource must score at least 30 points out of a □ Passed
maximum 40 points to pass this criterion. Please put a □ Failed. All issues must
check mark on the appropriate box be documented in the
Comments section
Criterion 2 must achieve 5 points

Factor B Other Findings

1. Cite conceptual errors found, if any. (use additional sheets, if necessary)

2. Cite example of grammatical, typographical, visual, or graphic (illustrations,

diagrams, pictures, maps, graphs, tables) errors found. Indicated the line and
page numbers where specific errors are found.

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
 Other comments

Recommendation

Note: Any material that fails factor A, Criterion 2 must not be recommended for use in
public schools until the identified issues have been fixed

(Please put a check mark (✓) in the appropriate box)

i. □ I/We recommended the approval of this material for possible use in public schools
provided that the corrections / revisions included in this report are made. (For commercial
resources (non-DepED owned resources) the Publisher must implement all recommended
corrections / revisions in their next printing or provide errata.)
ii. □ I/We do not recommend the approval of this material for possible use in public schools
for the reasons stated below and/or cited in this evaluation report. (Please use separate sheet
if necessary.)

(Please sign below and at the back of each page.)

I/We certify that this evaluation report and recommendation are my/our own and have been made
without any influence from others.

Evaluator(s): __________________________ Signature(s): ___________________

(Please print your full name)

Date: _______________________________

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
6.8 Technical Evaluation Guidelines and Checklist:
This checklist is derived from the LRMDS Technical Specification. Refer to Section 10.2.

Instructions:
1. Digital resources may be:
a) Digital and accessible online or offline (any digital file or composite of files
that can be stored in an online repository or is distributed on CD, DVD, USB)
b) Digital offline (DVD, , VCD, Videotape, audio cassette tape)
2. For a) Review using Sections A-F usability Characteristics and Section G Technical
Format Characteristics
3. For 1b) Complete Sections G and H
4. Provide the following information:

Title of the Material:

Format of the Material:
Subject Area:
Target Learner/User:
Copyright owner: Published: (Year)

6.9.1 A-F Usability Characteristics

Put a check (✓) in appropriate cell
CHARACTERISTICS YES NO N/A
A Multimedia Design
1. Media elements are of sufficiently high quality
2. Clear and precise instructions are provided in accessing multimedia
3. Appropriate forms of media are used to enhance presentation
4. The multimedia presentations have a coherent layout, design, and
background
5. Video is accompanied by a familiar control panel, featuring pause,
volume, and slider (to move quickly to a desired part of the video)
controls
6. Audio (other than short sound effects) is accompanied by a familiar
control panel, featuring pause, volume, and slider (to move quickly
to a desired part of the audio) controls
7. All images are accompanied by a detailed explanatory caption that
the user can easily access
8. All spoken sounds are accompanied by detailed textual transcription
captions that the user can easily access

CHARACTERISTICS YES NO N/A

B. Overall Interface
1. The design is visually appealing
2. The design is simple, i.e. not cluttered with irrelevant devices and
information
3. The design is consistent throughout successive displays
4. Contains sufficient information and directions for the user to use the
resource
5. The ways to navigate through the material are clear
6. Labels, buttons, menus, text, and general layout of the resources are
consistent and visually distinct
7. Fonts are readable in terms of size, color and contract between the
background and the next
8. The user is always made aware of what to do next

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
 9. The resource provides feedback about the system status and the
user’s responses
10. The user is informed of their position in the resource relative to its
beginning and end
11. The user is informed when a new window (such as browser window,
tab or pop up) will be displayed

CHARACTERISTICS YES NO N/A

C. Behavior of Controls & System Information
1. Clear visual indicators are used to display the position of the cursor
on line screen
2. The cursor changes shape to indicate its function and provide
information to the user
3. The resource responds obviously and appropriately to learners’
action
4. Icons that can be selected are designed to suggest their intended use
5. Controls found in many parts of the resource (menus, buttons, and
so on) that serve familiar functions throughout the resource are
placed in similar locations in all displays
6. Menus, buttons and other familiar controls use the same or similar
formats and appearances throughout the resource
7. A control that can be selected provides dynamic information to the
user about the specific function (e.g. the mouse cursor changes
appropriately and/or the control changes its visual appearance in
some way)
8. A control that has been selected indicates to the user that the
selected event has been recognized

CHARACTERISTICS YES NO N/A

D. Customizability /Support for User Preference
1. The user can adjust the size of the font for displayed text
2. The user can adjust the magnification of displayed materials
3. Methods to support navigation are clear and consistent throughout
the resource (e.g. arrows, keyboards shortcuts, menus)
4. The user can return to a previous state of the system and repeat from
there
5. All functionality is accessible through mouse only
6. All functionality is accessible by the use of mouse and or keyboard
7. The user can control the pace at which he/she moves through the
material

CHARACTERISTICS YES NO N/A

E. Data Entry by User
1. Data entry fields contain default values
2. Inputs data entry fields are constrained so that only permissible
values can be entered
3. The user is informed what the expected format of an entry (e.g. date
value) is, before the user makes the entry
4. The user is explicitly told when he or she needs to provide input
5. The user can control the length of time required to submit the data
on a data entry form (e.g. A “done” button is provided for the user to
indicate completion of all data entry)
6. The user is informed of exactly what is wrong with any erroneous
data entries
7. The user can correct erroneous data entries / supply missing entries
without having to re-enter correct items on the same form
8. Mandatory fields are clearly marked as such

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
 9. Drop down lists of previously entered values are presented when
user subsequently enters data into similar fields
10. Data entry forms support the tab key to move between entry fields
11. The fields on the data entry form are visited in a logical order when
the tab key is used to move between them

CHARACTERISTICS YES NO N/A

F. Hyperlinks
1. Hyperlink text provides information about where the link will lead
2. Hyperlinks are formatted using acceptable formatting conventions
for links (e.g. distinctive underlined font)
3. Hyperlink text is consistently formatted throughout the resource
4. The cursor changes appearance when it moves over the text of a
hyperlink to inform the user of the presence of a hyperlink
5. Hyperlinks that result in the user being directed to material that is
external to the current resource are clearly indicated

6.9.2. G. Interoperability: Technical format

Check all the areas of conformance.
PRINCIPLE REQUITREMENTS SPECIFICATIONS
Support platform and Resources can be used □ Mozilla Firefox 2 & 3 and Microsoft
browser independence equally effectively in Internet Explorer 6.0 in Microsoft
different browser Windows 2000

□ Mozilla Firefox 2 and Microsoft

Internet Explorer 7.0 in Microsoft
Windows XP

□ Apple Safari 2.0 on Apple OS X

Resources can be used □ Windows (Vista, XP)

equally effectively on
different operating □ Linux
system / platforms
□ Mac (up to 10.5)
Conforms to Markup language □ XHTML 1.1
International standards Style sheets □ CSS 1 / CSS 2
(e.g. IMS) for web Documents □ PDF
application □ RTF
Images □ PNG/MNG
□ GIF
□JPEG
Movies etc. □ MP3
□ MOV
□ MP2
□ AVI
□ SWF
□ FLV
Plug ins □ Flash (9)
□ Shockwave (10)
□ Quick Time (7+)
□ Java Applets
Scripting □ Java Script
□ SWF

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
 Standalone Files Must be “portable” □ Open Office
format □ Word/Excel/Power point
□ TXT
□ PDF
□ RTF
□ PDF is the recommended format (if
possible)
Production / authoring Support only □ see media types above +
software interoperable media □ Web 2.0
types □ XML
Size Total file size in bytes

6.9.3 H. Technical Formats for offline digital resources

Identify for the resource being evaluated the technical requirements for viewing and using the resource.
(Playback devices, operating system, software, plug-in)

Video cassettes: format and player requirements.

DVD: operating system, software, plug-in and player requirements.

CD: operating system, software, plug-in and player requirements.

VCD: operating system, software, plug-in and player requirements.

Audio Cassettes tapes: player requirements

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009
7 Evaluating Online Sites and Resources for Cataloguing

Title of online site ___________________________________________________________________

URL: ______________________________________________________________________________
□ Learning Resources □ Teaching resources □ Professional Development Materials
Grade / Year levels/s: _______________________________
Copyright owner: ___________________________________________________________
Contributors:

Date of Publication: _______________________

Date site reviewed: ________________________

Brief description of the online site and content

Evaluation Results
The following evaluations must be completed for the online site and resources.
Educational Soundness: (section 6.2) □ Passed □ Failed
Evaluation sheet for non-print resources: (section 6.6) □ Passed □ Failed
Technical Evaluation: (section 6.9) □ Passed □ Failed
Online Site Evaluation Rubrics: (section 7.1) □ Passed □ Failed

Attach all evaluation sheets.

Recommendation
(Please put a check mark (✓) in the appropriate box)
i. □ I/We recommended the approval of this site for including in the LRMDS catalogue.
ii. □ I/We do not recommend this site to be included in the LRMDS catalogue for the
reasons cited in this evaluation report.
I/We certify that this evaluation report and recommendation are my/our own and have
been made without any undue influence from others.

Evaluator(s): __________________________ Signature(s): ___________________

(Please print your full name)

Date: _______________________________

Guidelines and Processes for LRMDS Assessment and Evaluation V1.0 29/04/2009