Advance Reading Skill
Advance Reading Skill
Summery Analysis/Substance:
The sonnet “On His Blindness” is a personal meditation. This sonnet may be compared
with “How soon hath time...” Milton is here concerned with the proper use of the talent
which God has given him. He is bereft of his eyesight. His despair is voiced by Samson
in his utmost agony-“O dark, dark, dark, amid the blazed of noon.” The poet laments his
blindness. He has become blind in the middle of his life. So he can cot serve God with
his poetic gift. He, however, earnestly wishes to use his poetic talent which is the gift of
god for the service of him.
He afraid that God might scold him for spending his days idly. But the mood of the octet
changed suddenly as Milton nourishes a more optimistic view in the sestet.
His ambition was the highest that any writer of that time could have and he has afraid
that with his blindness he would no be able to write great poetry which he long
cherished. Milton believed in the Parable of talents, which showed that God expected
man to use and improve the gist he had been granted.
He compares himself with the third servant in the Parable of Talents. He fears that he
will be rebuked by God, as the third servant was rebuked by his master for not using his
talent. But then, the question comes to his mind-Does God demand service even from a
blind man? Soon his doubt passes and faith in God returns. He comes to believe that
God does not demand man’s active service. Persons who resign themselves to the will
of God are his best servants. All he demands of man is complete resignation to his will.
Those who bear his dispensations without protest and remain ready for his decrees
serve him best.
On His Blindness- Analysis Line by Line:
The poet reflects on his blindness. He has become blind in the middle of his life. He
therefore cannot make proper use of his poetic talent which is spiritual death for him to
hide. His soul is earnestly desirous of serving God with his own talent that God have
given him. He wishes to render a true account of his powers to God. He is afraid that
god will rebuke him for not using his power. (Lines 1-6)
The word “talent” has been used in more senses than one. In the Bible concept it
means a coin or more generally speaking money. When the master gives some money,
it is his duty to make use of it and increase it. Figuratively talent is a quality and
therefore wealth. In this sense even vision may be recorded as a talent. It is by using
one’s vision that one can do a lot of things. Milton was a pious Christian. His devotion
and dedication to God are evident in the poem.
How does Milton make up his mind to serve his maker in his
sonnet “On His Blindness”? Analysis of the Sonnet "On His
Blindness":
Milton’s “On His Blindness” is a famous autobiographical sonnet. The sonnet records
the poet’s agony on his becoming blind but it ends on a note of reconcilement.
When God gives us some talent, it is our duty to use it effectively so that it increases
and multiplies. It is a sin to hide one’s talent and not use it. Milton says that god has
given him talent to write and express profound thoughts. And it would be wrong not to
use his talent through creative enveavours, but unfortunately he has become blind. God
has taken away his vision. Light denies to him, and he is plunged in profound darkness.
The how can he do the job that he is expected to do. One way to serve God is to use
the talent God has given him. Bur this he can not be because he is now blind. So the
poet feels and agony of helplessness.
But then patience personified gives him consolation. He realises that Good needs
neither man’s work nor utilisation of his gifts. All that he expects is a complete surrender
to his will, a readiness to serve him. The poet is like angel who patiently waits for god’s
command.
Question: How does Milton console himself at the end of the poem?
Answer: After suffering immensely Milton al last gets some hope. He console himself by
saying that the best way to serve God is to obey Him by patiently carrying out His
orders.
Question: How does Milton compare himself through the word talent?
Answer: Milton thinks that he is like the third servant of the parable of Talents who kept
his one talent (gold coin) hidden in the earth. He did not use his talent (poetic gift).
Question: Who is the maker? How does Milton wish to serve the maker?
Answer: God is the maker. Milton wishes to serve his God by using his poetic gift.
Question: When did Milton wrote his sonnet “On His Blindness”?
Answer: The sonnet “On His Blindness” may have been written in 1652.
Answer: It meant that to hide the gift or to keep it useless is death to him. It is spiritual
death.
INTRODUCTION
This is a sonnet also called sonnet 116 written by a British metaphysical poet William
Shakespeare (1564-1616) that tries to fill the vacuum of infidelity and unfaithfulness in
marriage relationships. The poet shows that at least true love based on truth and
understanding can exist. He presents two glorious lovers who come into relationship
freely and are trustful to each other. He shows that this kind of love is usually
unshakable and always remains so no matter the circumstances.
THEMATIC ANALYSIS
TRUE LOVE
The kind of love that Shakespeare brings out here is the one that stands firmly even if
there might be consequences to shake it. He says that such kind of a love does not
alter/change when it alteration finds. For him true love is like “an ever-fixed mark” which
will survive any crisis. In lines 7-8 he continues to say although we may be able to
measure love to some degrees, this does not mean we truly understand it. Love’s actual
worthy cannot be known- it is a misery.
O, no! it is an ever-fixed mark,
That looks on tempests and is never shaken;
It is a star to every wandering bark,
Whose worth’s unknown, although his height be taken
This kind of love that Shakespeare expresses is the one that is unchangeable even
when challenged by some circumstances. Love is not flat but he warns that even if it
means to go through upside downs they should remain firm. It’s like a North Star that
guides the ship (bark) in deep sea.
On the marriage day there may really be no impediments (obstacles) but in the long run,
changes of circumstances, outward appearance and other conducts may challenge the
relationship. But lines 9-12 reaffirms that, this kind of love is unshakable throughout time
and always remains so.
Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,
But bears it out even to the edge of doom.
UNFAITHFUL LOVE
On the other hand he shows that there is another extreme of love that is not based on
mutual love. If something happens to challenge the relationship it breaks away.
…………………Love is not love
Which alters when it alteration finds,
Or bends with the remover to remove:
Lastly, in the final couplet the poet declares that if he is mistaken in his view of the
unmoveable nature of true love then he must take back all his writings on love, truth and
faith. Then he says if he judged love inappropriately no man has ever really loved in the
ideal sense that the poet professes.
If this be error, and upon me prov’d
I never writ, nor no man ever lov’d
QUESTIONS
Comment on the Tone and mood of the poem.
The tone is lovely because the poet generally talks about true love of two lovers and the
mood is romantic.
ii) What is the type of the Poem?
It is a sonnet made up of 14 verses (line)
iii) Comment on the rhyming scheme/ Pattern
The poem has a regular rhyming pattern of ABAB CDCD EFEF GG
iv). Comment on the Figures of speech and sound devices
Ø Metaphor
Love is compared to the star
It is the star to every wandering bark
Ø Allusion
The first two lines are a manifest of allusion to the words of the marriage service ‘if any
one of you knows cause of just impediments why these two persons should not be
joined together in a holy matrimony’
Ø Alliteration
….compass come.
Ø Personification
The poet uses abstract things like Time and Love as human beings to show that they
can do of feel like human beings. He even uses pronoun ‘his’ when referring to them.
E.g.
Ø Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks.
Ø Or bends with the remover to remove:
Is the poem relevant to your society?
Ø In the society today there are people with true love though they are very few. Most of
them fall in the category of love which changes with circumstances. When challenged
by poor income, lack of a child, or any other challenge it easily breaks away though on
the marriage day they admitted to remain together until death separates them. And that
they will survive the coming impediments.
What lesson do you get from the poem?
1) We should cherish true love.
2) True love is unshakable and remains so throughout time.
o What are impediments? What do you think the marriage of true minds is?
In actual sense impediments means obstacles/ hindrances. In marriage service this is a
covenant that the couple should make to see to it that their love is free and willing and is
one motivated by true love.
o What does the poet mean when he says that you can measure the height of a
star but not its worth? How can you apply this to love?
Always we can only judge outward appearance of something but inward characters are
difficult to be measured. So even in the case of love it is not what it always seems to be
in the outside. It’s worth lie deeper into the heart of someone. There is more to it than
just outward appearance. No one can read someone else’s heart.
o In Shakespeare’s day the word ‘fool’ could mean a servant. Why is love ‘not
Time’s fool’?
Love is not Time’s servant in a sense that love is timeless. It does not last with time but
it endures forever as long as those in love have decided to remain in love no matter
what circumstance may challenge their relationship.
The first stanza of the poem describes the world of the living people. The poet
addresses her dearest one and asks him not to sing sad songs for her when she is
dead. She does not want others to plant roses or shady cypress tree at her tomb. She
likes her tomb with green grass associated with showers and dewdrops.
Normally, we find that after the death people express their grief by singing sad songs
and by planting roses and cypress tree. But the poet thinks that they are just showing
off. She does not like showy behavior. She rather thinks that if people are really sorry
for the death of their loving person they should be humble like grass and only few drops
of tears will be sufficient. As the showers and dewdrops make the grass green forever,
so the tears will make their love eternal. Afterwards she does not force him to
remember. If he likes he will remember and if he does not like he will forget.
After her death she will be buried in the grave, and she will go into the world of the
dead. She will not see the shadows of the cypress planted by her dearest one. She will
not feel the rain or tears. However, sadly one may sing, but she will not hear it. The
sweet and sad song of the nightingale will not touch her. She will pass the rest of her
time dreaming through the never-ending evening when the sun neither rises nor sets.
Perhaps she will remember it. Perhaps she will forget it.
The entire poem consists of two stanzas and of two varying significance. The first
stanza deals with the world of living and the second with the poet's experience in the
grave. The poet may be trying to be realistic regarding her death. She is against any
sort of mourning that sings like of showing off. When she is dead, she won’t be able to
hear any songs, see any roses, or feel the Cypress shade. Therefore, the best way to
mourn someone’s death is by expressing the love as immortal as the green grass
through the drops of tears as pure as the dew drops. It is also equally meaningless to
insist someone to remember him/her after his/her death. Therefore, she gives her
dearest one the freedom to remember of forgetting as he/she wishes. The poem also
suggests us that no one can escape from the torturous grip of the death. If reflects a
quite melancholic and inflicted heart of the speaker.
By questioning the mourning ritual a poet had criticized the showing of behavior and
suggested some more sincere ways to express one’s sadness. Similarly, she also
seems to be giving more importance to life than after death rituals. Many people neglect
their loved one when they are alive, but try to show their grief by spending a lot of time
and money, when they are dead. The poet seems to be against such attitude and
conduct. Rather people should be humble in expressing their love and their sadness for
the departed ones.
The poem is published under the title ‘song’ elsewhere. It can be sung to the
accompaniment of some musical instrument. It has expressed the feelings and thoughts
of the poet in a very personal and subjective way. The rhymes, me and a tree, and rain
and pain please us. Similarly, the rhymes wet and forget, and set and forget having the
harsh sound ‘t’ which reminds us the harsh reality in life. The repetition of ‘s’, ‘w’ and ‘sh’
sound makes this song perfect. The music of the stanzas of this poem rises like a
gesture of the hand.
The sonnet uses a direct address which means that the first person persona (or the
voice of the poem) is talking to an addressee. This allows the reader to develop an
emotional connection with the persona. Evidence for this can be found immediately in
the first line of the poem: "When I am dead, my dearest,".
Language Analysis:
TITLE:
Significance of Title: The title, 'Song (When I am dead, my dearest)', suggests that
poem can be sung. This is reinforced by the rhythm that is created by the hymn meter.
As a result, the poem is given connotations of funerals creating a somber and solemn
mood. The (partial) repetition of the title foregrounds these attitudes.
STANZA ONE:
Repetition: The persona repeats the phrase "And if thou wilt," in the last two lines of the
first stanza. The use of the archaic term "wilt" (meaning will) suggests the persona's
indifference to whether they'll be remembered after they die. This nonchalant attitude
towards her legacy is emphasised not only by the repetition in these last two lines, but
by the caesurae following the repeated phrase. This break in the metrical line creates a
pause which allows the reader time to understand the persona's point of view. "And if
thou wilt, remember, / And if thou wilt, forget." This attitude may have been viewed as
controversial as the persona goes against the conventions of her time (when everyone
wanted to be remembered).
Alliteration: Throughout the first stanza, Rossetti also uses alliteration and sibilance to
create a song-like tone. The alliterative phrase "sad songs" which consists of a an
adjective followed by a noun, highlights the melancholic voice of the persona. On the
other hand, the use of "green grass" a phrase that is structured in the same way as "sad
songs" (adjective + noun), contrasts the gloomy mood of the previous phrase, bringing
connotations of freshness and new life perhaps offering a comforting promise of life
after death. The soft ‘sh' sound in the adjective "shady" and then again in the noun
"showers" reinforce her weary tone. This perhaps makes the reader more sympathetic
towards the persona.
Enjambment: The persona's use of enjambment between the fifth and the sixth lines of
the first stanza creates a sense of spontaneity and foregrounds the idea that the
speaker is freely expressing her controversial ideas about death and what comes after.
This makes her seem brave in the eyes of the reader, especially since the persona is
assumed to be a woman in the Victorian era.
Use of the Preposition "Above": The persona uses the proposition "above" when she
talks about where the addressee will be relative to her after her death. This suggests
that the persona will remain in the grave - both her body and soul - after she dies. This
contrasts the beliefs of the highly Christian society of Victorian Britain and the Anglo-
Catholic faith of the poet herself which both teach of life after death. The idea of the
persona staying in the grave after she dies eliminates the idea of a heaven and gives
death a sense of finality. This is also suggested by the lack of words with religious
connotations which is very different to many of Rossetti's other poems that focus on the
topic of death.
Use of the Noun "Cypress Tree": Cypress trees were planted typically in Victorian
cemeteries and therefore carry connotations of death, mourning and funerals. When the
persona tells the addressee not to plant a "cypress tree" by her grave the reader is
given the expression that the persona doesn't want the addressee to mourn. Perhaps
this is why she indifferent to whether they are forgotten or not - after all, she isn't the
one that has to live on after a tragedy (a lover's death, assuming that the addressee is
her lover). This creates a parallel between 'Song' and Rossetti's sonnet 'Remember'.
STANZA TWO:
Caesura: The persona uses a caesura in the fourth line of the second stanza: "Sing on,
as if in pain:" . This break in the metrical line reinforces her acceptance of death, her
acceptance of not being able to experience any earthly wonders.
Repetition of "I Shall Not": The persona repeats the negative modal verb "shall not" in
the first three lines of the second stanza which highlights the difference between life and
death. The repetition of "I shall not" highlights the transformation of the persona's
senses after death (she will no longer able to "see", "feel", or "hear" earthly
phenomena), demonstrating this clear divide between the living and the dead. This
foreground the idea expressed in the previous stanza that death is final and that the
body simply stays in the grave for eternity.
Use of the Archaic Adverb "Haply": The persona uses the archaic adverb "haply" ,
meaning perhaps, to express her uncertainty about death. This creates a sense of
ambiguity towards what happens after death which brings about a sense of hope:
perhaps there is a life waiting for us after death. This contrasts previous interpretations
which imply the finality of death and the absence of a heaven. The ambiguity towards
death is an attitude that is also suggested by the euphemism "twilight" in reference to
the subject. The use of this euphemism hints at the possibility of an afterlife and also
makes the persona seem curious about what awaits her after she dies.
Idea of a Nightingale's Song: The persona revisits the idea of songs in second stanza
when she says "I shall not hear the nightingale / sing on, as if in pain:". Here, unlike in
the first stanza where songs were given connotations of mourning and funerals, the idea
of happy, cheerful bird chirping is given a bitter mood, creating a sense of loss. This
implies that while the persona doesn't want her lover to mourn and sing sad songs when
she dies, she will feel deprived of the nightingale's song which she will not be able to
hear again after she dies. The contrast between the two different attitudes linked to
songs is highlighted by the metrical deviation of the third line in which the persona
mentions "the nightingale".
Themes
Self-expression and the natural world
This poem is concerned with natural and spontaneous expression through song or
poetry, such as the song of the ‘nightingale' (l.11). Poetry provides a natural outlet for
the speaker's emotions.
This song was posthumously published in 1633 in the volume entitled ‘Songs and Sonnets’. It
was written by Donne in his youth when he saw a good deal of London life. The subject of woman’s
inconstancy was a stock subject but Donne enlivened it with his personal experience. His gay life
in London and his association with different women in London only confirmed his view about
woman’s faithlessness.
In this poem, the poet, through a series of images, shows the impossibility of discovering a true
and faithful woman. While the poets following the Petrarchan tradition made of woman a
heroine and a goddess, worthy of love and admiration, the metaphysical poets poked fun at
woman’s fashions, weakness and faithlessness. Shakespeare’s maxim—”Frailty thy name is
woman” —was quite popular in the age of Donne. The fickleness of woman could be more easily
experienced than described. The cynical attitude to the fair sex in the early poems of Donne, is in
contrast with the rational attitude to love and sex to be found in his later poems.
DEVELOPMENT OF THOUGHT
According to Donne, it is impossible to fins; a loyal and chaste woman. Woman’s inconstancy
proved a popular subject with the Elizabethan and the Metaphysical poets. The poet, through
irony and exaggeration suggests the impossibility of the undertaking to discover a true and fair
woman. Fair women will have lovers and therefore it is not possible for them to be faithful to any
of them. (Faithfulness on the part of an ugly and uninviting woman can be a possibility because
she will not be able to attract lovers). The poet mentions a number of impossible tasks—catching
a falling star or meteor, begetting a child on a mandrake root, memory of past years, finding the
name of the person who clove the Devil’s foot, listening to the music of the fabulous mermaids,
changing human nature so as to make it indifferent to envy and jealousy or finding out the climate
which would promote man’s honesty. Just as it is impossible to do these jobs, in the same way it
is impossible to find a faithful woman. Even if a man were to travel throughout the world for ten
thousand days and nights—this would cover more than twenty-seven years—till his hair grew grey,
he would not come across a faithful woman. He might have seen many wonderful scenes and
sights, but he would not have seen the most wonderful sight of all—that of a true and fair woman.
A real pilgrimage
The poet is very keen on discovering a true and fair woman if there be any such in the world.
If any one tells the poet that there is such a woman, he would go on a pilgrimage to see her. She
would really deserve his admiration and worship. The poet, however, feels that the journey will
be futile, for even such woman’s faithfulness will be temporary. By the time one writes a letter to
her, she would have enjoyed with two or three lovers. Hence the poet despairs about seeing any
constant woman.
CRITICAL COMMENTS
Though technically the poem is a ‘song’ which should have sweetness, lilt and smoothness, it
has a lot of argument. The colloquial form of the poem—the speaking voice in a real situation—
deserves attention. The rhythm is similar to that of speech rhythm which changes according to
the needs of the argument. ‘The breaking of the tetrameter form in lines seven and eight (with two
syllables each) is a dramatic device that projects tension rather than irregularity, and indicates
the stress that one would use in a dramatic reading. “The poet constantly indulges in dislocating
the accepted rhythms, dropping his lines most unexpectedly (though always giving us pleasant
surprises) but the final impression is not one of confession but of an inner logic of the poet’s
experience”. The use of hyperbole is understandable: “Ten thousand days and nights till age snow
white hairs on thee”. The witty ironic reversal in the last stanza is a device commonly used by
Donne. All his journey and trouble in finding a true and fair woman would result in ‘love’s labour
lost’. The poet draws images from a wide field of knowledge—mythology, Christianity and
legendary love. He proves his thesis with a masculine gusto and youthful vivacity.
Donne’s poetry is based on an individual technique. His poetic diction and style is
unconventional. The ‘Donne-poem’ is an argument in which a mind living in analogy exploits a
chosen situation with a new and elaborate set of inter-connected images. His poems are like
voyages of discovery, exploring new worlds of life, love and spirits. They are voyages of the mind
which
Cerates, transcending these,
and other seas.
Matter more important than words
To Donne, matter was more important than words and the management of the thoughts
dictated the form of the poem. De Quincey thought that Donne laid principal stress on the
management of thought and secondly on the ornaments of style. Here is a poet who argues in
verse accompanied by music. As T.S. Eliot puts it, “A thought to Donne was an experience; it
modified his sensibility.”
His love-poems are explorations of the types of love and friendship, from the man’s point of
view. They are not so obviously “poetic”, as those of Marvell and Herrick. Excess of intellectual
satires and complexity prevent the luminosity and certainty of statement. This partly accounts for
his occasional inequality, violence and obscurity. His style stands in a class by itself. Cazamian
writes: “Donne will have nothing to do with the easy and familiar, the mythological imagery. At
the risk of being enigmatic, he takes pleasure only in the subtle. Passion, feeling, sensuousness—
all are subjected to wit. This play of wit sometimes results in astounding hyperbole; sometimes he
ingeniously brings together ideas as remote from each other as the antipodes, mingling the lofty
and the mean, the sublime and the trivial. He often prefers to a smoothly flowering line, the lines
that are freely divided, and in which he accents have an effect of shock, and pull the reader up and
awaken his attention”.
Donne’s world of ideas
The basis of the ‘Donne-poem’ is neither music nor imagery but the idea. There is a basic idea
underlying each poem. The idea may be real or fantastic but it is never artificial or affected. Donne
is modern in his psychological realism; he believed in the realism of a world of ideas. Donne told
his friends that he described “the idea of a woman and not as she was.” He rejected the courtly
idea of woman as an angel or a goddess. To him, woman was essentially fickle and inconstant in
love. The song beginning, “Go and catch a falling star” is based on the faithlessness of women in
love. Nowhere can you find a woman who is faithful to her lover—”Fraility, thy name is woman.”
His important poem—The Anniversary—is a record of domestic bliss. The love of Donne and his
wife is eternal and immortal and is not subject to decay or death:
All other things, to their destruction draw,
Only our love hath no decay;
This no tomorrow hath, nor yesterday....
His poem—The Sun Rising—is a stern warning to the sun not to disturb the lovers in their
bed-chamber. The proper duty of the sun is to call on schoolboys, apprentices and courtiers who
must attend to their work in time. His song—”Sweetest Love”—is based on the idea that parting is
no doubt sad and painful, but those who love each other sincerely and deeply can never be really
parted. This poem was addressed by Donne to his wife when he wanted to go to foreign countries
for about six months. He bids her farewell cheerfully, till he meets her again.
Both structural and decorative peculiarities of Donne’s poems
The ‘Donne-poem’ possesses both structural and decorative peculiarities. Firstly, the metre
is not a matter of chance but of choice. The metre is a part and parcel of the fused whole; it is not
an ornament super-added. S.T. Coleridge writes: “To read Dryden and Pope, you need only count
syllables; but to read Donne you must measure Time and discover Time of each word by the sense
of Passion.” You must hear his silences and his eloquence. Examine the following lines of the
poem The Relic:
When my grave is broke up again
Some second ghost to entertain,
(For graves have learned that woman-head
To be more than one a bed)
And he that digs it, spies
A bracelet of bright hair about the bone
Will not he let us alone,
And think that there a loving couple lies,
Who thought that this device might be some way,
To make their souls, at the last busy day,
Meet at this grave, and make a little stay?
Donne’s interest in music
Moreover, the greatest metrical variety in the form of syllables and stanzas shows not only
the fertility of his genius but also his interest in and ear for music, Let us analyse The Relic and
study its metrical effects. The Relic, a love poem, contains three stanzas. Let us read loudly the
first stanza to grasp the movement. Each stanza contains eleven lines, of which the first four are
octosyllabic or four-footed lines, the fifth and seventh are three footed, and the remainder of the
length are—of the blank. verse line i.e. decasyllabic. “In reading the first stanza aloud, one sees
that the first two lines, regular and equal, broach the theme with a typical Donnian startlingness
and boldness, lines three and four have the same length as one and two but their being enclosed
in brackets and the dig at woman’s inconstancy which they offer, the meaning is, graves have
learnt the feminine trick of being a bed to more than one person; old graves were often dug up to
make room for new tenants.”
Donne’s use of simple and colloquial language
Dryden appreciated Donne for fusing and combining complexity of substance with simplicity
of expression. According to Legouis, he did not feel any necessity of mentioning gods and
goddesses in his poetry. He rejected all the conventional and traditional poetic devices. He used
the different vocabulary and imagery which was quite popular among the masses of his time. In
his time, medieval scholastic learning and science was quite popular, although it appears very dull
and boring to the modem reader. Donne used all the current phrases and diction of his age. He
even expresses complex emotions by means of simple and colloquial diction and phraseology.
Thus, he revolted against the Petrarchan, Spenserian and pastoral poetry. The poet expressed
“Petrarchan sighs in Petrarchan language”. The language, diction and imagery of poets had
become too poetic, hackneyed and stereotyped. The conceits and images, metaphors and similes
bear resemblance to one poet or another. Donne’s constitution is considered remarkable because
of infusing into English language energy and sinewy strength. Due to the invigorating influence
of his poetic diction, his language brought new lustre to English literature.
Harmony of English verse
Donne tries to lend metrical pattern to the rhetoric of utterance. Yet his verse has no note of
jarring disharmony; on the contrary, it has a haunting harmony of its own. He is successful in
finding the rhythm that will express his passionate argument, and his mood: that is why his verses
are as startling as his phrasing.
Donne master of poetic rhetoric
What Jonson called the ‘wrenching of accent’ in Donne, can be amply justified. He plays with
rhythm as he plays with conceits and phrases. Fletcher Melton has analysed his verse to show two
metrical effects, the “troubling of the regular fall of verse-stress by the intrusion of rhetorical
stress on syllables which the metrical pattern leaves unstressed, and secondly, an echoing and re-
echoing of similar sounds parallel to his fondness for resemblances in thoughts and things.” He
apparently uses an individual poetic diction, in the same way, he chooses metrical effects which
are new and original. Prof. Grierson writes: “Donne is perhaps our first great master of poetic
rhetoric, of poetry used, as Dryden and Pope were to use it, for effects of oratory rather than of
song, and the advance which Dryden achieved was secured by subordinating to oratory the more
passionate and imaginative qualities which troubled the balance and movement of Donne’s
packed out imaginative rhetoric.”
Bold, original and startling use of figures of speech
The other important feature of his poetry is the bold, original and startling use of figures of
speech. Comparisons are useful in communicating sensations, feelings and states of mind. Donne
relies on his scholasticism for new and far-fetched comparisons, and yet they are real, credible
and meaningful. Donne, in Love’s Progress, draws on geography and science of navigation in
praising his mistress. The simile refers to the beloved’s eyes as sun, and the nose as the meridian.
The nose (like to the first meridian runs)
Not ‘twixt an East and West but ‘twixt two suns
The tears of lovers are always of great poetic account but Donne handles them in different
ways. In A Valediction of Weeping, he calls his tears coins; they bear her stamp because they
reflect her image; the tear acts as a mirror. Then be compares the tear to a blank globe before a
cartographer. In Witchcraft by a Picture, the poet’s eye is reflected in his beloved’s eye. As his
tears fall, her image also falls and so her love. In another poem, Donne compares a good man to a
telescope because just as a telescope enables us to see distant things nearer and clearer, in the
same way a good man exemplifies virtue in his life in a practical manner. A highly developed simile
is found in A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning written on the poet’s temporary separation from
his wife. The leave-taking should be quiet and peaceful as the dying of virtuous men. During
absence, the lovers’ two souls are not separated but undergo,
An expansion
Like gold to airy thinness beat.
Then the poet remarks that the two souls are like the two legs of a compasses:
If they be two, are two so
As stiff twin compasses are two;
Donne’s irony
Donne is fond of irony. A faithful woman will be false even while you inform others of her
virtue:
Yet she
Will be
False, ere I come, to two or there.
In Woman’s Constancy, Donne shifts irony from the beloved to himself:
Now thou hast lov’d me one whole day
Tomorrow when thou leav’st what will thou say?
Will thou then antedate soon new made vow?
Or say that now.
We are not just those persons which we were?
For by tomorrow I may think so too.
The poet is afraid that the beloved will break off their relationship in one way or another. He
changes his own idea, and thinks that even if she does nothing, he himself may end their
relationship. Donne does not spare himself when he engages in pun.
In A Hymn to God the Father, he writes, “When thou hast done, thou has not done, For, I
have more.”
Donne is fond of paradox. Here is one from A Burnt Ship with all its grim humour:
Out of a fired ship which by no way rescued
But drowning could be rescued from the flame
Some men leap’d forth and even as they came
Near the foe’s ships did by their shot decay
So all were lost which in the ship were found,
They in the sea being burnt they in the burnt ship drowned.
The abundant use of poetic devices and metres shows that Donne is intellectual to the finger-
tip. He plays not only with words but also with ideas. His mind is full of medieval theology,
science, mathematics and jurisprudence. His imagination is as complex as his intellect. His
ingenuity finds expression in hyperbole, wit and conceit. His poetry may not be harmonious or
musical at times, but we cannot deny that it always poses both sincerity and strength—elements
necessary for greatness in poetry. The strength of Donne lies in his being an inimitable poet, one
whom it is very difficult to emulate. Donne in the Holy Sonets writes: “Show me dear Christ, thy
spouse so bright and clear.” The Church is certainly the bride but she is open to most men which
is hardly complimentary to any married woman. Here he is both paradoxical and ironical.
Donne’s use of Diction in a Peculiar Manner
Simple words are used in unexpected way. Although diction is simple, yet simple words are
combined in unexpected ways and thus strange compounds are formed. For example:
(i) A she-sigh from my mistress’ heart....
(ii) No tear-floods, nor sigh-tempests move;...
Donne, sometimes, uses puns which are simple but effective; for example son/sun;
done/Donne. Thus his use of words is often subtle and suggestive. He suggests much more than
he narrates or describes.
“His vivid, simple, and realistic touches are too quickly merged in, learned and fantastic
elaborations and the final effect of almost every poem of Donne’s is bizarre, if it be the expression
of a strangely blended temperament, an intense emotion, a vivid imagination.”
Donne is bizarre and wayward in his style. He is “a maker of conceits for their own sake, a
grafter of tasteless and irrelevant ornaments upon the body of his thought There are poems which
undoubtedly support these accusations, and I shall be the last to deny that Donne relished the
play of “wit’ for its own sake; but I am convinced that in general his style is admirably fitted to
express his own thought and temperament, and in all probability grew out of the need of such
expression. The element of dissonance is no exception. No doubt, it expresses his spirit of revolt
against poetic custom…..in this case the poetic ideal of harmony. But the expression of revolt is
only a superficial function. With its union of disparate suggestions dissonance is most serviceable
instrument, in fact a prime necessity of expressing Donne’s multiple sensibility, his complex
modes, and the discords of his temperament. In short, the dissonance; of style reflects a
dissonance inwardly experienced.”
“What is true”, writes Grierson, “of Donne’s imagery is true of the other disconcerting element
in his poetry, its harsh and rugged verse. It, is an outcome of the same double motive, the desire
to startle and the desire to approximate poetic to direct, and unconventional colloquial speech.”
“Donne’s verse has a powerful harmony of its own, for he is striving to find a rhythm that will
express the passionate fulness of his mind, the fluxes and refluxes of his moods, and the felicities
of his verse are as frequent and startling as those of his phrasing. He is one of the first, perhaps
the first, writers, of the elaborate stanza or paragraph in which the discords of individual lines or
phrases are resolved in the complex and rhetorically effective harmony of the whole group of
lines....”
“Donne secures two effects; firstly the trebling of the regular fall of the verse stresses by the
introduction of rhetorical stresses on syllables which the metrical pattern leaves unstressed; and
secondly, an echoing and re-echoing of similar sounds parallel to his fondness for resemblances
in thoughts and things apparently the most remote from one another.”
“He writes as one who will say what he has to say with regard to conventions of poetic diction
or smooth verse; but what he has to say is subtle and surprising and so are the metrical effects
with which it is presented...It was not indeed in lyrical verse that Dryden followed and developed
Donne, but in his eulogistic satirical and epistolary poems.”
Donne’s dramatic flexibility, rhetorical touches and poetic rhythms
Donne is quite dramatic in offering catchy opening lines. He almost catches the reader by his
arms and give him a jolt. This dramatic rhythm gives the illusion of talk in a state of excitement.
Donne is original in his innovation of poetic rhythm. As Legouis asserts: “John Donne is perhaps
the most singular of English poets. His verses offer examples of everything castigated by classical
writers as bad taste and eccentricity, all pushed to such an extreme that the critic’s head swims as
he condemns...At the outset of Donne’s career, Spenser had already won his glory, and the
Petrarchan sonneteers were producing collection upon collection. The independent young poet
reacted against these schools. He despised highly regular metres and monotonous and
harmonious cadences. He violated the rhythm in his Satires, Songs and Sonets and in
his Elegies. His friend and admirer Ben Jonson said of him that he esteemed him ‘the first poet in
the world for some things’ but also that, ‘Donne, for not keeping of accent deserved hanging’.
Closely examined, this crime, for such it is, derives from his subordination of melody to meaning,
his refusal to submit to the reigning hierarchy of words, sometimes from his lapses into the
expressive spoken tongue, in defiance of the convention of poetic rhythm.”
Helen Gardner further remarks: “Donne deliberately deprived himself of the hypnotic power
with which a regularly recurring beat plays upon the nerves. He needed rhythm for another
purpose; his rhythms arrest and goad the reader, never quite fulfilling his expectations but forcing
him to pause here and to rush on there, governing pace and emphasis so as to bring out the full
force of the meaning. Traditional imagery and traditional rhythms are associated with traditional
attitudes; but Donne wanted to express the complexity of his own moods, rude or subtle,
harmonious or discordant. He had to find a more personal imagery and a more flexible rhythm.
He made demands on his reader that no lyric poet had hitherto made.”
Conclusion
The memorable nature of Donne’s verses will strike any casual reader. Such verses haunt our
memory and return to us again and again. Grierson has beautifully summed up the salient
characteristics of John Donne’s style and versification. As he remarks: “Donne’s verse has a
powerful and haunting harmony of its own. For Donne is not simply, no poet could be, willing to
force his accent, to strain and crack a prescribed pattern; he is striving to find a rhythm that will
express the passionate fulness of his mind, the fluxes and refluxes of his moods; and the felicities
of verse are as frequent and startling as those of phrasing. He is one of the first masters, perhaps
the first, of the elaborate stanza or paragraph in which the discords of individual lines or phrases
are resolved in the complex and rhetorically effective harmony of the whole group of lines...The
wrenching of accent which Jonson complained of is not entirely due to carelessness or
indifference. It has often both a rhetorical and a harmonious justification. Donne plays with
rhythmical effects as with conceits and words and often in much the same way...There is, that is
to say, in his verse the same blend as in his diction of the colloquial and the bizarre. He writes as
one who will say what he has to say without regard to conventions of poetic diction or smooth
verse, but what he has to say is subtle and surprising, and so are the metrical effects with which it
is presented. There is nothing of unconscious or merely careless harshness in his poetry. Donne
is perhaps our first great master of poetic rhetoric, of poetry used, as Dryden and Pope were to
use it, for effects of oratory rather than of song, and the advance which Dryden achieved was
secured by subordinating to oratory the more passionate and imaginative qualities which troubled
the balance and movement of Donne’s packed, but imaginative rhetoric.”
the mind and this conflict between the old and the new faith. “Show me dear Christ thy spouse so
bright and clear”. There was also the other conflict in Donne—the conflict between ambition and
asceticism, between the prospects of civil service and the claims of a religious life. But after a
number of years, Donne continued to retain a soft corner for Catholics.
Main Aspects of Donne’s Religious Poetry
Donne was essentially a religious man, though he moved from one denomination to another.
His spirit of rational faith continued throughout his life. The following are the main aspects of
Donne’s religious poetry:
(i) Conflict and doubt
As a man of the Renaissance, he could not but question the assumptions and beliefs of the
Roman Catholic Church. Being born in a particular religion is one proposition and being
convinced of the Tightness of one’s faith, is quite another. As he was sceptical of the religious
dogmas of the Catholic Church, he adopted the Anglican faith, but even so his mind was not at
peace. He could not reconcile the inner conflicts and as such he prayed for God’s mercy and grace,
so that he might be able to build his faith on a sound foundation. In his A Hymn to God the
Father, he ultimately arrives at a firm faith. It is perhaps the culmination of his spiritual quest.
(ii) Note of introspection
The metaphysical clement which is so evident in his love poems, finds expression of an inner
heart searching. He digs deep within himself in order to measure his sincerity and devotion to
God and above all his consciousness of sin and the need of penitence. His fear of death—Donne
must have seen many of his friends on their death-beds and their last struggles—makes him
repent for his past follies and hence his prayer to God for His mercy and compassion. The Holy
Sonets particularly maybe regarded as poems of repentance, and supplications for divine grace.
Donne’s intention is not to preach morality or to turn men to virtue. Grierson writes in this
connection: “To be didactic is never the first intention of Donne’s religious poems, but rather, to
express himself, to analyse and lay bare his own moods of agitation, of aspiration and of
humiliation, in the quest of God, and the surrender of his soul to Him. The same erudite and
surprising imagery, the same passionate, and reasoning strain, meet us in both”.
(iii) The themes of his religious poetry
Donne found the contemporary world dry and corrupt. He felt that its degeneration would
lead to untold human misery. The main theme of his religious poems is the transitoriness of this
world, the fleeting nature of physical joys and earthly happiness, the sufferings of the soul
imprisoned in the body and the pettiness and insignificance of man. Above all, the shadow of
death is all pervasive and this makes him turn to Christ as the Saviour. Even so, his metaphysical
craftsmanship treats God as ‘ravisher’ who saves him from the clutches of the Devil. Though
Donne regarded the world a vanity of vanities, he could not completely detach himself from the
joys of the world and there is a turn from other-worldliness to worldliness. However, we cannot
doubt the sincerity of his religious feelings and his earnest prayer to God for deliverance. His
moral earnestness is reflected in his consciousness of sin and unworthiness for deserving the grace
of Christ He uses the images of Christ as a lover who will woo his soul.
(iv) Parallelism with love poetry
There is a great similarity of thought and treatment between the love poems and holy sonnets,
though the theme is different. The spirit behind the two categories of poems is the same. There is
the same subtle spirit which analyses the inner experiences like the experiences of love. The same
kind of learned and shocking imagery is found in the love poems:
Donne’s religious poetry cannot be called mystical poetry. Donne does not forget his self as
the mystics do. His is always conscious of his environment, of the world in which he lives and of
his passionate friendships. As such his religious poetry lacks the transparent ecstacy found in
great religious poetry. Helen White writes in this connection: “There was something in Donne’s
imagination that drove it out in those magnificent figures that sweep earth and sky, but whatever
emotion such passages arouse in us, Donne was not the man to lose himself. In another world
beyond the release of death, he hoped to see his God face to face, and without end. But he was not
disposed to anticipate the privileges of that world in this, nor even in general try to do so... The
result is that in most of the mystical passages in both his poetry and his prose, the marvellous
thrust into the ineffable is followed by a quick pull-back into the world of there-and-now with its
lucid sense-detail and its ineluctable common sense.”
Donne’s holy sonnets are deservedly famous and are remarkable. They embody his deeply felt
emotions in a language reflecting conscious craftsmanship.
Inferior wit lies in the use of paradox, pun, oxymoron and word-play. Higher wit is the
discovery of conceits and the assembly and synthesis of ideas which appear dissimilar or
incongruous.
In a true piece of wit, all things must be
Yet all these things agree
As in the Ark join’d without force or strife
All creatures dwelt, all creatures that had life (Cowley)
Donne is remarkable as much for his metaphysical element as for his wit. Hartley Coleridge,
however, pokes fun at Donne’s wit:
Twist iron pokers into true love knots
Coining hard words not found in polyglots.
Peculiar wit
Donne has been called “the monarch of wit’. Dryden wrote: “If we are not so great wits as
Donne, we are certainly better poets.” Pope echoed the same thought: “Donne had no imagination,
but as much wit, I think, as any writer can possibly have.” Dr. Johnson felt that Donne’s wit lay in
the discovery of hidden resemblances in dissimilar things.
Donne’s wit is deliberate and peculiar. It impresses us with its intellectual vigour and force
and does not merely lie in the dexterous or ingenious use of words. Secondly, it comes naturally
from the author’s expansive knowledge and deep scholarship. According to Leishman, Donne’s
wit lies in his imprudent and shocking language. T.S. Eliot, however, finds his wit in the fusion of
opposites—the blend of thought and feeling, what he calls ‘sensuous apprehension of thought’.
The wit of Donne stands in a class by itself. Though his wit has points in common with
Caroline poets, it has certain points which are peculiarly its own. Moreover, there is a world of
difference between the wit of Shakespeare and Pope and the wit of the metaphysical poets. T.S.
Eliot remarks: “The wit of the Caroline poets is not the wit of Shakespeare, and it is not the wit of
Dryden, the great master of contempt, or of Pope, the great master of disgust.” In Elizabethan
poets, wit is decorative and ornamental. It is a result of light-hearted fancy or strange setting. In
Donne, wit is the result of weighty thought and brooding imagination. It is a living image, and a
subtle conceit, coloured with the quality of his thought:
I saw Eternity on the other night.
Donne’s wit is grave and full of significance and sometimes pregnant with strange ideas.
Its complexity
Donne’s wit is a compound of many similes extracted from many objects and sources. His wit
has certain distinct qualities. Donne’s wit is scholastic or dialectical rather than metaphysical. He
is fond of a logical sequence, ingenious and far-fetched analysis. In his poem entitled, The
Anagram, Donne by a series of dialectical paradoxes defends the preposterous proposition that
an old and ugly woman will make a better wife than a young and handsome one.
Similarly Donne defends his apparent gaiety during the absence of his beloved in his own
paradoxical manner:
That Love’s a bitter sweet, I never conceive
Till the sour minute comes of taking leave
Another I taste it. But as men drink up
In haste the bottom of a next civned cup
And take some syrup after, so do I.
To put all relish from my memory
Of parting, drown it in the hope to meet
Shortly, again and make our absence sweet.
Variety of moods
Donne’s wit expresses all moods from the gay to the serious, and from the happy to the
pessimistic. Sometimes he is flippant and irreverent. In the Flea, he deifies a flea and calls it a
marriage temple. In many poems, the poet debunks the customary vows of lovers and the
Petrarchan conventions. Sometimes there is self-mockery and the poet plunges from the sublime
to the ludicrous. The variety of poems on love like Love’s War, Love’s Diet, Love’s Exchange,
Love’s Usury, and Love’s Alchemy shows the range of his passion and wit.
Mental vigour
The secret of Donne’s wit lies in its mental strength and intellectual power. It is an expression
of his rational outlook on life, an embodiment of his poetic sensibility, and a reflection of his vision
of life. One critic observes in this connection that it is “the outward projection of his sense of the
many-sidedness of things, of his manifold possibility, and ultimately a recognition of the
multiplicity of experience.” Donne could afford to laugh at established practices and convictions
because he disliked humbug and pretence. A critic remarks: “What one sees all the time are
established certainties being crumbled, positive pretensions denied or mocked, the very
affirmations of the poem doubted or discredited before it ends, and a few certitudes won by hard
proof in the face of contingent circumstance”.
Irony
The secret of Donne’s wit lies in his use of irony. Irony is a literary device by which words
express a meaning that is often the direct opposite of the intended meaning. In this manner, the
poet by implication comments on the situation. Donne’s irony is noticed in his attitude to love
which can, to an extent, be summed up in the phrase: “What fools these mortals be!” The
indignation and mockery takes on a literary phraseology and the intention of the poet is obvious.
A.J. Smith writes in this connection: “The outright mockery of people and sects, and the
impugning of motives in general, certainly isn’t cynical. It expresses a perspective which takes the
world’s activities as ludicrous feverishncss in respect of bedrock human certainties; not however
occasion for despair but, diverting by their own zestful life. The overturning of accepted
evaluations seems the more convincing because it is the reverse of solemn: and because it
emphatically doesn’t imply any rejection of experience, but rather a delight in it.”
Comparisons
Donne’s analogies are apt and full-blooded. In Love’s War, Donne compares the qualities of
a good lover and a good soldier; as for instance, the capacity to keep awake for nights together,
the courage to face an enemy (rival) boldly, to besiege and take by storm, to elude watchmen and
sentries. Donne’s analogies are compressed syllogisms. Just look at this syllogism:
All that is lovable is wonderful
The mistress is wonderful,
Therefore the mistress is lovable.
Donne compresses the above argument in the following two lines:
All love is wonder; if we justly do
Account her wonderful, why not lovely too?
At times, Donne’s wit takes the form of epigram:
If things of sight such Heaven be
What Heavens are those we cannot see.
Donne makes a sort of pattern of thought, of a mind moving from the contemplation of a fact
to a deduction from a fact, and thence to a conclusion. Oliver Elton notes the endless ‘teasing of
words and thoughts’. Prof. Croft observes: “Thus the brain-sick fancies are piled up, twaddle upon
twaddle, until the whole thing explodes with a passionate contrary or a familiar image.” The
notable thing about his comparisons is their novelty and freshness, their references to unlikely
things and places. For example, the poet compares the two lovers to the Phoenix and to both the
eagle and the dove. The lovers will be ressurected after death like the Phoenix. Joan Bennett
observes: “They evoke severe sense memories of a literary heritage. If they evoke memories, they
are of large draughts of intellectual drink, imbibed from science rather than poetry. ”Donne is in
the habit of elaborating a figure to the furthest stage to which ingenuity can carry it.
Exaggeration
Exaggeration is an important element in Donne’s wit. This exaggeration appears to be
outrageous in its high spiritedness:
Go and catch a falling star
Get with child a mandrake root....
Donne being an anti-traditionalist, is keen on shocking people. His wit takes a kind of moral
holiday by flouting traditional ideals and morals in several relationships. Dr. Johnson takes
exception to Donne’s wit on two grounds, aesthetic and moral. Dr. Johnson is offended by its lack
of proportion and decorum, its “fundamental unseriousness, its detachment, and its immorality”
To teach thee, I am naked first, why then
What needst thou have more covering than a man
Dr. Johnson applies Pope’s definition to the works of Donne:” That which had been often
thought, but was never before so well expressed”. Donne does not conform to this concept of wit.
According to Dr. Johnson, wit is both conventional and new, but the wit of Donne is a combination
of dissimilar images, a discovery of the occult resemblances in things unlike. The most
heterogeneous ideas are yoked by violence together, nature and art are ransacked for illustrations,
comparisons and allusions; their learning instructs and their subtlety surprises, but the reader
commonly thinks his improvement dearly bought and though he sometimes admires, is seldom
pleased. If they frequently threw their wit upon false conceits, they likewise sometimes struck at
unexpected truth; if their conceits were far-fetched, they were often worth the carriage.
Paradox
Dr. Johnson compares Donne’s paradoxes to remarks made by epicurean deities on the
actions of men, devoid of interest or emotion. T.S. Eliot is also struck by the “telescoping of images
and multiplied associations, constantly amalgamating disparate experiences always forming new
wholes out of matter so diverse as reading of Spinoza, falling in love and smelling the dinner
cooking”. In one of his satires, Donne emphasises his companion’s inconsistency and absurdity in
hating naked virtue, although he loves his naked whore. Leishman dwells on the outrageous
hyperbole and perversity of Donne’s wit—”wit, often deliberately outrageous and impudent and
coat-trailing, often breath-takingly ingenious in the discovery of comparisons and analogies, but
nearly always, in one way or another, argumentative, sagacious, rigid, scholastically
argumentative, whether in the defence of preposterous paradoxes or in the mock-serious devising
of hyperbolical compliments.”
She is all States and all Princes, I,
Nothing else is.
Countries, Towns, Camps, beg of from above
A pattern of your love.
What can be more dramatic and hypothetical than:
I wonder, by my troth what thou and I
Did, till we lov’d?
When the lover is dead on account of disappointment in love, ghost of the lover will haunt and
harass the beloved.
Donne is not merely witty but passionately witty or wittily passionate, in the two poems
entitled The Anagram and The Bracelet. The words in themselves are not difficult, but the
structure of sentences is far from simple.
Conclusion
To some critics, Donne’s wit is one of the means of escape, an escape from boredom and
depression which constantly afflicted him during the years of his creative activity. Through wit
and intellectual ingenuity, Donne avoids both self-pity and Hamlet-like frustration. Drummond
rightly calls him “the best epigrammatist we have found in English”.
In the ultimate reckoning, Donne’s wit may be regarded not only symbolic of his spirit of
interrogation and discovery but also the embodiment of introspection and intellectualism, the
rebellion and conflict in the mind of Donne.
is of ingenuity rather than of justice: the metaphysical conceit aims at making us concede justness
while we are admiring its ingenuity.”
The separation of the husband and wife in A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning, is like the
movement of one leg of the compass while the other leg is fixed at the centre. The drawing of the
circle to indicate the journey of the poet to a foreign country and the stay of his wife at London
like the fixed side of the compass is basic to the theme of the poem. The rotating side of the
compass must return to the base to join the other side ultimately and as such there is no need to
mourn.
Mixture of thought and feeling
Donne blends thought and feeling in his conceits to achieve the ‘unification of sensibility. The
situation is emotional, almost explosive while its treatment and descriptions are wholly
intellectual. Mark the description of the cheeks of the beloved in The Second Anniversary.
Her sure and eloquent blood
Spoke in her checks and so distinctly wrought,
That one might almost say her body thought.
(LI. 244-246)
Here the body (a physical thing) is connected with thought. In this connection T.S. Eliot
writes: “The poets of the seventeenth century, the successors of the dramatists of the sixteenth,
possessed a mechanism of sensibility which could devour any kind of experience...simple,
artificial, difficult, or, fantastic....”
Sources
Donne does not draw on the source-material of Elizabethan poets for his conceits. His
originality prevented him from following the Petrarchan or pastoral tradition. He sought conceits
from the rich and varied experiences of his own life and the widening horizons of knowledge and
the world around him. Joan Bennett writes in this connection: “His images are drawn from his
own interests, so that he is always illustrating one fact of his experience by another. Everything
that played an important part in his life or left its mark upon his mind occurs in the poetry, not as
subject-matter but as imagery. His subject-matter was, as has been seen, confined almost entirely
to various aspects of love and of religion; but his imagery reveals the width of his intellectual
exploration”. Moreover, Donne had tasted life to the finger-tips and had lived en the continent for
quite some time. This widened the scope of his knowledge and as such he enriched his poetry with
conceits drawn from his vast experience of men and manners.
(i) Conceits reflecting contemporary developments
John Donne made various references to alchemy for his conceits. He utilisea contemporary
chemical ideas indiscriminately. He made use of the latest scientific theories and current
superstitions for ornamentation of his poems. He frequently utilised geographical images which
reflected increasing knowledge of the world’s surface during his time. All these subjects were his
delight; all such subjects occurred to him in his mood of poetic creation. For example, his poems A
Valediction: Of the Book, The First Anniversary, Hymn to God, God in My Sickness, The Good
Morrow, and An Anatomy of the World reflect his craziness for using the contemporary ideas
pertaining to geography.
(ii) Imagery drawn from everyday trade and commerce
Donne was a realist. This fact becomes evident when we see images drawn from the world of
everyday commerce, trade and industry. Red-path asserts: “A firm and even a stern realism is
often imparted to the poems by the references to war and military affairs, death, law, politics,
medicine, fire and heat, business, the human body, and many of the features of home life; while,
on the other hand, a certain lofty” strain is often provided by the references to scholastic doctrine,
astronomy, religion, and learning; and a note of strangeness is injected by the references to
alchemy, astrology and superstition.”
(iii) Imagery drawn from disease and death
Donne himself experienced disease and poverty. So, he had an urge to learn medicine. His
knowledge of medicine enabled him to draw images from disease, dissolution and death. A critic
asserts: “Such imagery has aroused disgust in certain quarters and has laid Donne open to the
charge of morbidness. In this connection it must be remembered that Donne was writing in an
age when Death lurked round the corner, and plague, famine and violence were an everyday
occurrence.”
Function of Donne’s imagery and conceits
Donne’s originality is reflected when he makes use of images and conceits drawn from various
sources and spheres. In this respect, he is different from the other poets. T.S. Eliot appreciated
him highly because of this remarkable trait. Donne achieved unification of sensibility i.e. fusion
of thought and feeling very successfully and artistically. His reader is capable of simultaneously
sharing an emotion, enjoying a joke feeling and thinking at the same time. Take for example The
Sun Rising where the reader moves from the mood of the first stanza to that of the last. Another
poem, The Relic indicates the sardonic mood which the reader shares. So the function of his image
and conceit is multifarious. Coleridge defines the function of poetry: “Judgement ever awake and
steady, self-possession with enthusiasm, and feeling profound or vehement.” This view of
Coleridge is applicable to John Donne’s imagery and conceits. The great critic, Joan Bennett, has
compared the poetry of John Donne with that of Keats. Keats’s sensuous impression is identified
with the thing he wants to express. On the other hand, Donne identifies his intellectual analogy
with his emotion. Thus, “the purpose of an image in his poetry is to define the emotional
experience by an intellectual parallel.”
Donne’s images and conceits, not isolated from the context
Although Donne’s conceit or image is rugged, coarse and far-fetched, yet it imparts a sense of
pleasure and exaltation as it has an astonishing link with the whole poem. In other words, an
image cannot be detached from its context. It emerges out of a certain situation of high emotional
tension. His conceits or images outgrow from the given dramatic movement to indicate the
relationship of the characters and that of ideas. Same is the case with the conceits of Shakespeare,
a born dramatist of his period. John Donne’s conceits or images reveal an organic growth,
profuseness and proliferation which get sustenance from complexity, intensity and profundity of
the given experience. Thus a particular conceit of Donne has a significance in the context of the
whole poem.
Obscure and complex nature of Donne’s conceit
Donne’s conceit or image is highly obscure, difficult and complex. It makes a considerable
demand on the reader to understand it. According to J.C. Grierson, it brings together the
opposites of life i.e., body and soul, earth and heaven, the bed of lovers and the universe, life and
death, microcosm and macrocosm in one breath. Readers, further, undergo difficulty because of
the medieval learning of Donne. Although these images or conceits were popular in his age, yet
readers of the present age are not well conversant with them. Donne has a fertile mind. He
encloses within a little space huge conceits. His mind moves very smoothly and with great agility
from one dissimilar concept to another. Readers are confused and bewildered because of this fact.
They should also possess equal agility and profound understanding to follow him. A student of
ordinary calibre cannot follow Donne’s far-fetched objects and concepts which are juxtaposed in
his conceits. In this manner, John Donne puts his readers to great strain and demands
considerable efforts from them to understand him because of the complex nature of his imagery.
Born at a time when the writing of love poems was both a fashionable and literary exercise,
Donne showed his talent in this genre. His poems are entirely different from the Elizabethan love
lyrics. They are singular for their fascination, charm and depth of feeling. His contemporaries
wrote love-lyrics after the` manner of Petrarch and Ronsard. But Donne dallies half-ironically
with the convention of Petrarch. His love songs are unconventional and original, both in form and
content. Here is a blend of sensibility and wit, of joy and scorn, of beauty and repulsion. Look at
the scornful anger of the jilted lover:
When by thy scorn, o murderess,
I am dead
And that thou think’st thee free
From all solicitations from me.
Then shall my ghost come to thy bed.
Another peculiar quality of Donne’s love poems is its metaphysical strain. Donne does not lay
stress on beauty or rather the aesthetic element in passion. His poems are sensuous and fantastic.
He goes through the whole gamut of passion from its lowest to its highest forms. Had he had a
greater sense of beauty and intensity of feeling, he would have ranked as one of the greatest love
poets of the world. His metaphysical wit makes his readers doubt his sincerity and earnestness.
Dryden writes: “Donne affects the metaphysics not only in his satires but in his amorous verses
where nature only should reign. He perplexes the minds of the fair sex with nice speculations of
philosophy, when he should engage their hearts and entertain them with the softness of love.”
Tenderness and sentiment are not the qualities to be found in Donne’s poetry. The metaphysical
strain is evident in his scholasticism, his game of elaborating fantastic conceits, his hyperboles,
and paradoxes. Donne uses the common emblem of perfection and intensity of love by means of
the circle. In his poem Love’s Growth, love is symbolised by the growing circles of water stirred
by a pebble.
If as in water stirred more circles be,
Produc’d by one, love such additions take.
The lover’s feelings resemble, by their harmony, the concentric spheres of the Ptolemaic
universe. Love is infinite like God’s creation.
Donne in Love’s Infiniteness, pleads with his beloved that she should give him a part of her
heart. After she has given him a part, he demands the whole heart. When she has given him the
entire heart, he feels that his love must grow and have a hope for the future.
Love’s riddles are, that though thy heart depart,
It stays at home, and thou with losing sav’st it;
But we will have a way more liberal,
Than changing hearts, to join them, so we shall
Be one, and one another’s all.
This is the goal and consummation of love. He then startles and outrages the expectations of
his readers. Similarly, in the matter of expression, he is rugged and rhetorical. No doubt by
bringing in the personal element, his verses become impressive and arresting:
For God’s sake, hold your tongue and let me love.
I long to talk with some old lover’s ghost
Who died before the God of love was born,
Twice or thrice had I loved thee,
Before I knew thy face or name.
I am two fools, 1 know,
For loving and for saying so.
In whining poetry.
I fix mine eye on thine and there
Pity my picture burning in thine eye,
My picture drowned in a transparent tear,
When I look lower I espy.
Donne’s love poems can be divided under three heads—
(i) Poems of moods of lovers, seduction and free love or fanciful relationship.
(ii) Poems addressed to Anne More (his wife) both before and after marriage.
(iii) Poems addressed to noble ladies of his acquaintance and compliments to wives and
daughters of citizens.
Three strands
There are mainly three strands in his love poems. Firstly, there is the cynical which is anti-
woman and hostile to the fair sex. The theme is the fraility of man—a matter of advantage for
lovers who liked casual and extra-marital relations with ladies. Secondly, there is the strand of
happy married life, the joy of conjugal love in poems like A Valediction: Forbidding
Mourning addressed to his wife and Elegy on His Mistress—where temporary absence will only
whet the appetite of love:
When I am gone, dream me some happiness,
Nor let thy looks our long-hid love confess.
These poems are dedicated to the peace and fulfilment to be found in a happy marriage.
Thirdly, there is the Platonic strand, as in The Canonization, where love is regarded as a holy
emotion like the worship of a devotee of God. There are, however, certain poems where the
sentiment oscillates between the first and the third strands—where sexual love is treated as holy
love and vice versa. In some poems the tone is rugged, harsh and aggressive as in The
Apparition. Much depends on the situation selected and the mood of the poet.
Realism
Donne’s treatment is realistic and not idealistic. He knows the weaknesses of the flesh, the
pleasures of sex, the joy of secret meetings. However, he tries to establish the relationship between
the body and the soul. True love does not pertain to the body; it is the relationship of one soul to
another soul. Physical union may not be necessary as in A Valediction: Forbidding
Mourning. However, in another poem, The Relic, the poet regards physical union as necessary.
Such contradictions, however, do not mar the value of his poetry. They only tend to emphasise
the dichotomy between the claims of the body and need of the soul.
In spite of the realistic touches and descriptions in the love-poems, Donne does not take pains
to detail the beauty and fascination of any part of the female body. Rather he describes its effect
on the lover’s heart. Here and there, he allows himself freedom to wander over the different parts
of female anatomy, but like the earlier poems, he does not dwell on the charms of the lips, eyes,
teeth or cheeks of a handsome mistress. It is rather surprising that a poet who is so fond of sex
should abstain so totally from the temptation to dwell on the physical structure or charm of any
part of the female body.
Extra-marital love
That sex is holy whether within or outside marriage is declared by Donne in his love poems.
If love is mutual, physical union even outside marriage cannot be condemned. Though as a
Christian he may not justify extra-marital relationship, as a lover and as a poet, he does accept its
reality and joy. He would not scorn such relationship as adultery. What Donne feels is that the
love-bond is essential for sexual union. Without love, any act of sex is mean and degrading.
However, true love can exist outside marriage, though moralists may sneer at it.
Attitude to woman
Donne does not feel that woman is a sex-doll or a goddess. She is essentially a bundle of
contradictions. As such he laughs at her inconstancy and faithlessness. He believes in ‘Fraility, thy
name is woman”. His contempt for woman is more than compensated by his respect for conjugal
love. At times, he regards the beloved as an angel who can offer him heavenly inspiration and
bliss. This two-fold attitude to woman— woman as a butterfly, and woman as an angel—depends
on the situation and the mood of the poet.
In the poems addressed to his wife—Anne More—the poet deals primarily with the joys of
fulfilled and consummated love. Here is a total experience of the triumph of serenity and mutual
love which brings with itself a sense of serenity and bliss. Moreover, these poems (Valediction :
Forbidding Mourning and A Valediction: of Weeping reveal the poet’s eternal faith in life.
Conjugal love, at its best is more rewarding and meaningful than weeping in unfulfilled love. The
best love poems are, indeed, those which show the fulfilment of a happy married life.
Petrarchanism with a difference
While the Elizabethan love lyrics are, by and large, imitations of the Petrarchan traditions,
Donne’s love poems stand in a class by themselves. Donne’s love poems are entirely
unconventional except when he “chose to dally half-ironically with the conventions of Petrarchan
tradition.” Donne is fully acquainted with the Petrarchan model where woman is an object of
beauty, love and perfection. The lover’s entreaties to his lady, his courtly wooing, the beloved’s
indifference and the self-pity of the lover are common themes of Petrarchan poems. Such set
themes are treated differently by Donne, because he has no own intimate experience to guide him.
His utter realism makes him debunk the idea of woman as a personfication of virtue and chastity;
woman is made of flesh and blood and she loves sex as much as man. In The Indifferent, Donne
openly declares that he does not mind the complexion or proportions of any girl. All that he wants
is sexual intimacy. However, he establishes a metaphysical relationship between body and soul—
namely that physical love leads to spiritual love as in The Ecstasy:
Love’s mysteries in souls do grow,
But yet the body is his book.
Donne is different from Petrarch in his attitude to love. Here is wooing, but it is of a different
type. The plea is a marriage bed and a holy temple of love. His courtship is aggressive, compelling
and violent; there is no trace of self-pity in it. Rather there is a threat of revenge declared openly
by the lover:
Then shall my ghost come to thy bed.
The lover’s ghost watching the beloved enjoying with another lover will cause a shiver in the
beloved and she herself will turn into a ghost. The theme of death as in The Relic, The
Funeral, and The Apparition is given a realistic and vivid interpretation.
Undoubtedly, Donne adopted the important characteristics of Petrarch, namely his use of
images and conceits, and his dramatic approach. He, however, transformed them so rigorously by
his intellect that they appear to be quite original. The hyperboles of Petrarch are farfetched while
those of Donne are not so. His conceits are not decorative but functional. Take the conceit of the
pair of compasses in A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning. How factual and how convincing is
love that must return to its base after it has gone full circle. Secondly, mark the dramatic way in
which the lover addresses the beloved in harsh and rhetorical language:
When by thy scorn, O murderess I am dead....
I am two fools, I know
For loving and for saying so....
I wonder by my troth, what thou and I
Did, till we lov’d? Were we not wean’d till then?...
The conceit becomes a blend of levity and seriousness, of mockery and wisdom, of physical
passion and higher love.
Passion and thought
The fact is that Donne does not allow his passion to run way with him. He holds it in check
with his reason. When the beloved wants to crush the flea who has bitten her, the poet argues with
her dissuading her from what he calls triple murder of the lover, the beloved and the flea.
Similarly, Donne moderates the intensity of passion with his life as in The Canonization. The
lovers will be regarded as saints of love and worshipped accordingly. Donne’s achievement lies in
wedding thought to emotion, and argument to personal passion. In this connection, Grierson
writes: “Donne’s love poetry is a very complex phenomenon, but the two dominant strains in it
are just these : the strains of dialectic, subtle play of argument and wit, erudite and fantastic; and
the strain of vivid realism, and the record of a passion which is not ideal or conventional, neither
recollected in tranquility nor a pure product of literary fashion, but love as an actual, and
immediate experience in all its moods, gay and angry, scornful and rapturous with joy, touched
with tenderness and darkened with sorrow.” Dryden, too, comments on the intellectual and
metaphysical element of his love poetry thus: “He perplexes the minds of the fair sex with nice
speculations of philosophy when he should engage their hearts and entertain with softness of
love.”
Supremacy of love
Mutuality of love is the secret of penance and bliss in conjugal life. Love is not subject to
change on account of the passage of time or difference in enviornment:
Love, all alike, no season knows nor clime,
Nor hours, days, months, which are the rags of time.
The total fulfilment and glory of love is echoed in The Sun Rising:
She is all states, and all Princes I,
Nothing else is.
In fact true love is the merger of two souls—two bodies with one life:
Our two souls therefore, which are one.
The poems like Good Morrow, Valediction and Ecstasy represent oneness of the souls of real
lovers—the joy of contented passion, where love has been sublimated into holy affection.
Donne: an innovator of a new kind of love poetry
Donne was an innovator of a new kind of love poetry. Elizabethan love poetry was written on
the Petrarchan model following the pattern set by the Italian poets like Dante, Ariostio and
Petrarch. The love songs and sonnet sequences of Spenser, Sydney, Wabon, Davidson and
Drummond described the pains and sorrows of love—the sorrow of absence, the pain of rejection,
the incomparable beauty of the lady and her unwavering cruelty. They seldom (except some of the
Finest of Shakespeare’s sonnets) dealt with the joy of love, and the deep contentment of mutual
passion. Moreover, they made use of a series of constantly recurring images, of “rain, of wind, of
fire, of ice, of storm and of warfare; comparisons and allusions of Venus and Cupid, Cynthia and
Apollo etc. as well as abstractions such as Love and Fortune, Beauty and Disdain.
Donne’s attitude towards love is intellectual
John Donne was the first English poet to challenge and break the supremacy of Petrarchan
tradition. Though at times he adopts the Petrarchan devices, yet the imagery and rhythm, the
texture and the colour of the bulk of his love-poetry are different. Moreover, there are three
distinct strains in his love poetry-cynical, the Platonic, and of conjugal love. A number of his
popular songs as Go and catch a falling star, Send home by my long stray’d eyes to me, or such
lyrics as Women’s Constancy, The Indifferent, Aire and Angels. The Dream, The Apparition and
many others, are written in a cynical strain. The love which he portrays is not impassioned, courtly
or chivalric, but intellectual love in which art plays a predominent part.
Classification of Donne’s Love-Poems
First group: Most of the poems in Songs and Sonets and Elegies belong to the first group.
Donne analyses the attitudes and moods of love. The majority of the poems belongs to the dark
period of 1590. Donne frequently dwells on the fickleness of woman. No woman is capable of faith
and virtue. His songs, beginning with Go and catch a falling star, end with a bitter mocking,
cynicism and denunciation of the fair sex. Nowhere can one find a true woman if one travels the
whole globe. Even assuming that a faithful woman has been found, that woman will prove faithless
even before the poet is able to visit her
Yet she,
Will be,
False, ere I come, to two, or three.
There is no Platonism here, but bitter satire against woman:
Hope not for mind in woman; at their best
Sweetness and wit, they’re but mummy possest.
Sometimes Donne is extremely sensuous and even indelicate:
As the sweet sweat of roses in a still,
As that which from chafed musk cat’s pores doth trill,
As the ‘almighty balm of th’ early East,
Such are the sweet drops of my mistress’ breast,
And on her neck her skin such lustre sets.
They seem no sweat drops, but pearl coronets:
Rank sweaty froth thy mistress’ brow defiles.
Donne is even more passionate and sensual in Elegie XIX entitled To His Mistress Going to
Bed:
Licence my roving hands, and let them go
Before, behind, between, above, below.
O my America! my new found land,
My kingdom, safeliest when with one man manned
To teach thee, I am naked first, why then
What needst thou have more covering than a man.
After the night of love, the sun warns the lovers. In The Sun Rising the lover rebukes the sun
for disturbing the lovers. The sun should not call on lovers but on school-boys, hunters and
farmers. Love is beyond time and space.
Love, all alike, no season knows, nor clime,
Nor hours, days, months, which are the rags of time ...
The lover seeks to kill the flea which has bitten him, but on second thoughts forbears, because
it has also bitten the beloved and has brought about the union of lovers in its body:
Me it sucked first, and now sucks thee,
And in this flea, our two bloods mingled be;
Confess it, this cannot be said
A sin, or shame, or loss of maidenhead
Let not to this, self murder added be,
And sacrilege, three sins in killing three.
The lover thinks that killing the flea will amount to a triple murder (shedding the blood of the
lover, the beloved and the flea).
In The Funeral, the lover warns the undertaker not to remove the hair of his beloved tied to
his arm.
separation is only temporary. Love triumphs over the idea of parting. This separation is like a
short sleep:
But think that we
Are who but turned aside to sleep;
They who one another keep
Alive, ne’er parted be.
Another poem—A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning also refers to a temporary separation
when Donne was called from home. The poet compares the journey to the two legs of a compass,
one remaining fixed and the other moving to complete the circle.
Such wilt thou be to me who must
Like the other fool, obliquely ran;
Thy firmness mike my circle just,
And mikes me end, where I begun.
These love lyrics are inspired by a depth and sweetness of affection and offer a contrast to the
trival and ‘conceited’ poems of the early period.
Third group: There is a third category of love poems which is partly Petrarchan and partly
Ovidian in tone. These songs and poems are written as conventional exercises in praise of certain
ladies whom Donne knew. Some of them were addressed to the Countess of Bedford and some to
Mrs. Magdalene Herbert. Twicknam Garden refers to the poet’s friendship with the Countess of
Bedford, a cultured and accomplished lady of the seventeenth century. It is not known weather
this lady, in any way, responded to the love of the poet Possibly Donne misconstrued her friendly
regard for him as a son, Love converts joy into sorrow. Even spring cannot bring happiness to the
poet’s heart. Though women in general are false and faithless, the poet’s sweet heart is an
exception. The “poet desires that lovers should judge their mistresses” love by comparing the taste
of her tears with that of their tears. The poet feels drawn to her on account of her sincerity and
faithfulness.
O perverse sex, where none is true but she,
Who’s therefore true because her truth kills me.
In A Nocturnal Upon St. Lucy’s Day, being the shortest day, Donne brings forward the
argument that whereas in nature, love brings life to a dead world every spring, his love cannot be
revived after his beloved’s death.
For I am every dead thing,
In whom love wrought new alchemy .
The Relic is addressed to Mrs. Herbert:
All measures and all language I should pass,
Should I tell what a miracle she was.
Similar compliments were paid to the Countess of Huntingdon and others. This was a
fashionable literary pastime. As Grierson puts it: “It is after all convention that regulates both the
length of a lady” skirt and the kind of compliments one may pay her” So these pieces do not
express the true sentiments of the poet.
Donne’s love poetry is a record of moods, of the conflict between emotion and intellect, of the
war between sense and spirit, body and soul. Donne wanted to embrace the totality of experience-
-not a slice of life, but life in all its entirety. So his experiences are both good and bad, bitter as
well as sweet. After the storm of passion subsided, Donne returned to his spiritual and ascetic self.
His thought developed as he grew. He refused to accept the dualism of the body and the soul. In
love, too, it is heresy to separate the body from the soul. Strangely enough, love and death are
brought together, because they release man from human limitations and inhibitions. Death will
open a way to the infinitude of love which is not possible in physical existence. Ordinarily it is
thought that death cheats the lovers of their joy, turning to defeat their feat of victory:
Death be not proud, though some have called thee
Mighty and dreadful, for, thou are not so.
In the later poems, Donne achieves the peace that passes understanding through divine love.
From physical love to spiritual love--this is the way of the mystics. So real and passionate love is
the path of a self-discovery, the finding of the Universal soul:
where no one but thee, th’ Eternal root,
Of true love I may know.
Conclusion
What surprises the reader, is the variety of moods, situation and treatment of the theme of
love-sensual, realistic, violent and full of vivacity of life. There is scorn, sarcasm, bitterness and
cynicism at times, but the genuineness and force of love is unquestionable. George Saintsbury
writes in this connection: “To some natures, love comes as above all things, a force quickening the
mind, intensifying its purely intellectual energy, opening new vistas of thought, abstract and
subtle, making the soul intensely wondrously alive. Of such were Donne and Browning.
Donne is one of the greatest of English love-poets. In fact, among all the English love poets,
he is the only complete amorist. His capacity for experience is unique, and his conscience as a
writer towards every kind of it allows of no compromise in the duty of doing justice to each. The
poetry of lust has never been written with more minute truth, but then neither has the poetry of
love transcending sex.
Dryden was the first use the epithet—metaphysical poetry—to cover the poetic work of
Donne, Cowley, Vaughan and his contemporaries. Dr. Johnson revived this epithet and wrote an
essay on the metaphysical poets in his Life of Cowley. Dr. Johnson attacked the metaphysicals on
several grounds—for their parade of learning, for their remote and fantastic analogies and
conceits, for their carelessness; in diction, for their novelty intended to shock the reader, for their
ingenious absurdity, rug-gedness and subtlety. He was indifferent to the vein of weighty thought
and brooding imagination, the originality and metrical achievement of the metaphysical poets.
He had no eye for the nobler and subtler qualities of their genius. A literary dictator as he was, he
condemned without reservation what did not appeal to his classical mind.
Dr. Johnson’s account of the school is well worth quoting, though its general condemnation
is unjust to some delightful poets, such as Herbert and Vaughan. As he states in Life of
Cowley: “About the beginning of the seventeenth century, appeared a race of writers that may be
termed the Metaphysical poets...The Metaphysical poets were men of learning, and to show their
learning was their whole endeavour....If the father of criticism (i.e., Aristotle) has rightly
denominated poetry an imitative art, these writers will, without great wrong, lose their right to
the name of poets, for they cannot be said to have imitated anything; they neither copied nature
nor life, neither painted the forms of matter, nor represented the operations of intellect. Their
thoughts are often new but seldom natural. The most heterogeneous ideas are yoked by violence
together; nature and art are ransacked for illustrations, comparisons, and allusions; their learning
instructs, and their subtlety surprises: but the reader commonly thinks his improvement dearly
bought, and, though he sometimes admires, is seldom pleased. They were wholly employed on
something unexpected and surprising. They never inquired what, on any occasion, they should
have said or done, but wrote rather as beholders than part-takers of human nature; without
interest and without emotion. Their courtship was void of fondness, and their lamentation of
sorrow. Their wish was only to say what they hoped had been never said before....Their attempts
were always analytic; they broke every image into fragments; and could no more represent, by
their slender conceits and laboured particularities, the prospects of nature, or the scenes of life,
than he who dissects a sunbeam with a prism can exhibit the wide effulgence of a summer noon.”
From the aforesaid statement, Dr. Johnson has pointed out the following peculiarities of the
metaphysical poets:
(a) They were men of learning and made a pedantic display of their strange knowledge.
(b) They affected a peculiar ‘wit’ which may be described as a kind of Discordia Concors a
combination of dissimilar images or discovery of occult resemblances in things apparently unlike.
(c) Their fondness for analysis, which broke an image into bits, led them to the dissection of
emotion rather than a direct and impassioned expression of it.
(d) Harshness and irregularity of their verse which is poetry only to the eye, not to the ear.
MAIN ASPECTS OF METAPHYSICAL POETRY
“Passionate thinking”
There is plenty of passion in this kind of poetry, but it is passion combined with intense
intellectual activity. T.S. Eliot thinks that “passionate thinking” is the chief mark of metaphysical
poetry. Thus, even in The Anniversary where Donne gives a lofty expression to the love and
mutual trust of himself and his wife, his restless mind seeks farfetched ideas, similitudes and
images in order to convey to the reader the exact quality of this love and trust.
The peculiarities of the metaphysical lyric
The metaphysical lyric lays stress on the fantastic, on the intellectual, on wit, on learned
imagery, on conceits based on psychology of flights from the material to the spiritual plane, on
obscure and philosophical allusions, on the blending of passions, and thought, feeling and
ratiocination. The metaphysical lyric is a blend of passion, imagination and argumemnt.
According to A.C. Ward, the metaphysical style, is a combination of two elements, the fantastic in
form and style and the incongruous in matter and manner.
Philosophical conception of the universe and ordinary experiences
Metaphysical poetry is inspired by a “philosophical conception of universe and the role
assigned to the human spirit in the great drama of existence.” Undoubtedly, its themes are simple
human experiences, the joy and sorrow of love, the thrill of adventure and battle, the hustle and
excitement of the town and in addition mystic experiences and inner conflicts known to the
greatest thinkers and philosophers. Donne and his fellows are not the metaphysical poets in the
full sense of the term. They are ‘metaphysical’ in a restricted sense. Donne is metaphysical, by
nature of his scholasticism, his knowledge of Plato, Aristotle, the medieval philosophers and the
new learning of the Renaissance, his deep reflective interest in his personal experiences, the new
psychological curiosity and dissecting genius with which he writes of life, love and religion. But
he is often frivolous, tortuous and sceptical. According to T.S. Eliot, the metaphysical desire is the
“elaboration of a figure of speech to the furthest stage to which ingenuity can carry it” and the
telescoping of images and multiplied associations. Donne is aware of the dash between the old
and the new, the world of faith and the world of reason, the clash between the old geographers
and Copernicus and his followers:
The new philosophy calls all in doubt
The element of fire it quite put out;
The sun is lost and the earth, and no man’s wit
Can well direct him where to look for it.
Source of metaphysical inspiration: love poetry and religious poetry
Metaphysical poetry resolves itself into the two broad divisions of amorous and religious
verse. The former was written largely by the courtly poets, Carew, Suckling, and Lovelace, and the
latter by Herbert, Crashaw, and Vaughan, who all dedicated their gifts to the service of their
religion. The metaphysical element, it seems, first made its appearance in love poems, following
the example of the Italian writers, whom Donne seems to have adopted as his models. Under this
influence, made yet more popular by the practice of Donne, “every metaphor, natural or
traditional to the theme of love, was elaborated in abstract and hyperbolical fashion,” till it gave
rise to indulgence in strange and far-fetched images. From this the practice spread to all kinds of
poetical writing, amorous or otherwise. But though it returned to England through Italy, the
metaphysical mode is traceable, in its origins, to the poetry of the Middle Ages, where the lover
woos his mistress in the same artificial tone which characterises metaphysical verse. As Prof.
H.J.C. Grierson puts it: “The Metaphysicals of the seventeenth century combined two things, both
soon to pass away, the fantastic dialectics of medieval love-poetry and the simple, and sensuous
strain which they caught from the classics—soul and body lightly yoked and glad to run and soar
together in the winged chariot of Pegasus.”
Donne has written many ‘songs’ and ‘sonnets’ on the subject of love. But he does not follow
the Petrarchan tradition of love poetry as we find in Spenser and Shakespeare. He does not flatter
his beloved or glorify her. On the contrary, in many of his songs he shows a cynical contempt for
women. For example, in ‘Song’ he makes it clear that a man may be able to catch a falling star or
say where all the past years are; he may, indeed achieve the impossible, but he will never be able
to find a woman true and fair. But Donne is also capable of deep feeling. The poems he wrote to
celebrate his wedded love, are full of such feelings. He says to his wife in The Anniversary that all
honours and glories, all the princes and their favourites might perish—
Only our love hath no decay
This no to-morrow hath, nor yesterday.
Running it never runt from us away,
But truly keeps his first, last, everlasting day,
There is also a fine feeling in the song, Sweetest love I do not go.
But Donne as a poet of love is very often given to subtle arguments. If he had less of arguments
and more of passion he would have been a greater poet of love. He is rather rough too.
Although in his youth he had lived an irregular life, Donne took to religion whole-heartedly
in his middle age and entered the church. He was an excellent preacher and rose to be the Dean
of St Paul’s. His Divine Poems, as his religious verse is called, is marked by an intense feeling of
piety, by a brooding thought on the subject of death and a strong faith in Resurrection.
Learning in Metaphysical poetry
Metaphysical verse is laden with the scholarship of its authors. A whole book of knowledge
might be compiled from the scholarly allusions in Donne and Cowley alone. To such learning in
itself there could, of course, be no objection. It is an enrichment of the poet’s mind, and part of
the equipment for his high vocation. Injudiciously applied, however, it can only mystify the
average person, and it was unfortunate that, as Dr. Johnson noted, the Metaphysicians
“sometimes drew their conceits from recesses of learning not very much frequented by common
readers of poetry.” The poet is not made by what he can give at second or third hand, unless his
own genius can transmute it. As Johnson also said: “No man could be born a Metaphysical poet,
nor assume that dignity of a writer, by descriptions, copied from descriptions, by imitations
borrowed from imitations, by traditional imagery and hereditary similes, by readiness of rhyme,
and volubility.”
Obscurity in metaphysical poetry
“In the task of trying to find the verbal equivalent for states of mind and feeling,” to quote
T.S. Eliot, the Metaphysicals made themselves difficult to understand. As we have seen, they
combined dissimilar ideas without attempting to unite them, and the reader was left to divine
what they really had in mind. So far as their later reputation was concerned, this did not serve
them well for several generations. Ben Jonson predicted that Donne’s fame would not live because
of his incapacity to open himself to his reader, and indeed this great poet had almost to be
rediscovered in our own times. Coleridge however, did the school more justice. “The, style of the
Metaphysical,” he wrote, “is the reverse of that which distinguishes, too many of our most recent
versifiers;’ the one conveying the most fantastic thoughts in the most correct lanaguage, the other
in the most fantastic language conveying the most trivial thoughts.”
“Unified sensibility” in metaphysical poetry
It was T.S. Eliot who made the phrase “unified sensibility” popular. According to Eliot, the
two faculties, that of feeling and of thinking came to be dissociated from each other on account of
one-sided emphasis placed since the time of Milton on intellect. Thus after the seventeenth
century, we have either poetry of thought or poetry of feeling. Such a separation of thought from
feeling is called dissociation of sensibility. This had an adverse effect on the history of poetry. But
in the early part of seventeenth century feeling and thought were combined, they were one
operation of the mind. It was not possible to think without feeling and to feel without thinking.
This is called a unified sensibility (or unification of sensibility). Donne and the Metaphysicals had
a unified sensibility. Their poetry expressed through thinking and feeling at the same time. Here
is a direct apprehension of thought, or a recreation of thought into feeling. Eliot tells us in the
essay Metaphysial Poets: “The poets of the seventeenth century, the successors of the sixteenth,
possessed a mechanism of sensibility which could devour any kind of experience.” Thus in the
seventeenth century, a dissociation of sensibility set in. If the Metaphysicals are obscure and
difficult, it is because their sensibility is unified, and ours dissociated.
The Metaphysicals are constantly amalgamating disparate experiences. Donne had the knack
of presenting different objects together. These objects are quite remote though undeniable
similarity has been brought about by the poet. He connects the abstract with concrete, the physical
with spiritual, the remote with the near and the sublime with the common-place. “This
juxtaposition, and sometimes, interfusion of apparently dissimilar or exactly opposite objects
often pleasantly thrills us into a new perception of reality.” And Donne, says Hayward, is a
‘thrilling poet’:
Oh, to vex me, contraries meet in one
Inconstancy naturally hath begot
A constant habit.
These “contraries” meeting in Donne’s poetry vex not only the poet but also his readers. His
successors handled these contraries rather crudely with very unpleasant effects.
Metaphysical conceits and images
A characteristic feature of metaphysical verse is indulgence in “dissimilar images, of
discovery of occult resemblances in things apparently unlike.” A comparison is often instituted
between objects that have ostensibly little in common with each other. Cowley, for example,
compares being in love with different women to travelling through different countries—”two
heterogeneous ideas yoked by violence together”:
Hast thou not found each woman’s breast
(The land where thou hast travelled)
Either by savages possest,
Or wild, and uninhabited?
What joy could’ st take, or what repose.
In countries so uncivilized as those.
Often the figure of speech is elaborated to the furthest stage to which ingenuity can carry it. In the
following stanza from the same poem, Cowley pushes the geographical metaphor as far as it can
go: women’s breasts (or, as we should say, hearts) being different lands, have now different
constellations to influence their climate:
Last, the scorching dog-star, here
Rages with immoderate hen;
Whilst Pride, the ragged Northern Bear,
In others makes the cold too great.
And where these are temperate known,
The soil’s all barren sand or rocky stone.
In plain language, some women are too wanton, others too proud; those who are temperate are
unresponsive to the approaches of love.
The metaphysical poetry is full of far fetched images (“conceits” as they are called) and
allusions and references borrowed from branches of learning—old and new. For example, Donne
represents himself in Twicknam Garden as an unhappy lover. He comes to a public garden in
order that the sights and sounds there might console him. But that is not possible as he has
brought with him his spider Love, which transubstantiates all (a piece of medieval science). He
wants to be converted into a fountain so that he may weep all the time. But his tears would be true
tears of love. Lovers should come and take his tears in phials and comparing them with those shed
by their mistresses find out if the latter are true in love! Again, his own mistress is unkind to him
because she is chaste. But what a paradox! Among the women she is the only true of chaste
woman, and “who’s therefore true, because her truth kills me.”
Metaphysical conceits convey a unified experience
R.G. Cox points out: “At its best the metaphysical conceit communicates a unified experience;
what matters is the sense of imaginative pressure and intensity; it is only where this is absent that
the ingenuity seems obtrusive and we feel impelled to speak of frigidity and fantastic hyperbole”.
John Donne has made a characteristic use of ideas and experience and the most startling
connections are discovered between them. When the use of conceit fails in its purpose, Dr.
Johnson’s remark. “the most heterogeneous ideas are yoked by violence together” seems to be
justified and when it succeeds one thinks rather of Coleridge’s remark that imagination shows
itself in “the balance or reconciliation of opposite or discordant qualities.”
Affectation and hyperbole in metaphysical poetry
Natural grace is often hard to find in metaphysical writing, which abounds in artificiality of
thought and hyperbolical expression. The writers probably deemed it a passport to fame to say
“something unexpected and surprising.” “What they wanted of the sublime, they endeavoured to
supply by hyperbole; their amplification had no limits; they left not only reason but fancy behind
them and produced combinations of confused magnificence, that not only could be credited, but
could not be imagined”. Here is Cowley again, promising a tempest of sighs in return for one or
two from his dear one:
By every wind that comes this way,
Send me at least a sigh or two
Such and so many I’ll repay
As shall themselves make winds to get to you.
The complement is violent and unnatural, and does not give the effect of real emotion.
Diction and versification of metaphysical poetry
The Metaphysicals reacted against the cloying sweetness and harmony of the Elizabethan
poetry. They deliberately avoided conventional poetic expressions. They employed very prosaic
words as if they were scientists or shopkeepers. Thus, we find rugged and unpoetic words in their
poetical works. Their versification and their diction is usually, coarse and jerky. According to
Grierson, the metaphysicals had two motives for employing very coarse and rugged expressions
in their poetical works. Firstly, they wanted to startle the reader. Secondly, they had the desire to
make use of direct, unconventional and colloquial speeches.
Donne could “sing” whenever he liked but often, he seems to be “bending and cracking the
metrical pattern to the rhetoric of direct and vehement utterance.” He very often throws all
prosodic considerations to the winds and distributes his stresses not according to the metre but
according to the sense.
Excessive intellectualism of metaphysical poetry
According to Grierson, the hallmark of all metaphysical poetry are passionate feeling and
paradoxical ratiocination. The same critic observes that the Metaphysicals “exhibited deductive
reasoning carried to a high pitch”. Often Donne states at the beginning of a poem a hopelessly
insupportable proposition which he defends later.
The metaphysical poets, in Johnson’s words, desired “to say what they hoped had been never
said before. They endeavoured to be singular in their thoughts and were careless of their diction.”
They did not feel obliged to follow the trodden path. They had their own thoughts and they worked
out their own manner of expressing them. “They played with thoughts,” said Sir Walter Scott, “as
the Elizabethans had played with words.” In fact, they carried the Elizabethan freedom of
imagination and delight in verbal fancies to a point at which it became difficult for the average
reader to grasp their meaning. For splendour of sound and imagery they substituted subtlety of
thought, though this must not be taken to mean that their work lacked its own beauty and
grandeur.
Reactions against metaphysical poetry
About the middle of the seventeenth century a change came over the English poetic
temperament. The metaphysical wave had exhausted itself, and had left literary standards and
values confused. The Metaphysicals had misused the Elizabethan ideal of liberty. It necessitated
the growing realization of clarity and control in poetry. Ben Jonson with his prophetic vision had
advocated literary order and discipline in place of lawless impulse and unbridled fancy. His
example was ignored for a time, but it was effective later when metaphysical method, in its decay,
began to produce more weeds than flowers. Cowley and Marvell had realised the importance of
poise and control in their verse. But Edmund Waller and Sir John Denham were the real pioneers
of the new movement. They led the reaction against metaphysical excesses by writing charming
verse on the classical model.
Rehabilitation of metaphysical poetry in the twentieth century
After the First World War metaphysical method again came into vogue. Consciousness of the
waste and futility of war, and the desolation and hopelessness resulting from it once more brought
God in purview. A sincere quest for positive faith emerged, and we have a marked tendency with
the opening of the thirties. Religious poetry came to be written under the influence of the
seventeenth century metaphysical poets. What gave a further impetus to the writing of religious
poetry was the popularity of Hopkins after being resurrected by Bridges in 1819. The poetry of
Hopkins had qualities which particularly appealed to the postwar world; it revealed a sense of
spiritual tension and frustration; it combined a powerful intellect with a strong sensuousness; it
possessed a bold originality of technique. The poetry of Hopkins is completely on the lines of the
old metaphysicals, with the same devotion of grace, the same technique of expression and the
same use of Donne’s breaking up of lines, suddenly indicating a pause.
‘The Caged Skylark’ is a typically metaphysical piece. In the thirties the poetry can be judged
from the impact it made upon poets who did not share the religion which inspired and governed
all that Hopkins wrote.
Eliot himself turned his face away from the faithlessness of the ‘Waste Land’ and ‘Hollow
Men’ and in ‘Ash Wednesday’ sought refuge in the Anglo-Catholic doctrines of faith. Since then,
religion has become his voice and he has been considered by some as the lost leader. Eliot’s poems
are in a complete sense metaphysical. Eliot’s art embraces Donne’s technique of the juxtaposition
of the levity with the seriousness, his method of presenting things by contrast, his use of wit and
conceits as well as his free manipulation of metre and rhyme scheme to suit the melody and
meaning of the piece. Ash Wednesday and poems composed after it are marked clearly by his
Anglo-Catholic inclination; Burnt Norton, East Coker, The Dry Salvages, and Little Gidding--
each of these of Four Quartets reveals symbolically this highest faith and is a finely universalised
song of enchantment of the highest entity in the sober and philosophical tone.
Conclusion
The term ‘Metaphysical’ was applied to the poetry of Donne and his followers first by Dryden
and then by Dr. Johnson. These poets—Donne, Cowley, Herbert etc.,--wrote mainly on two
subjects, love and religion. The term ‘Metaphysical’ is rightly applied to them as in their poetry
there is the habit “of always seeking to express something after, something behind the simple,
obvious first sense and suggestion of a subject.” (Meta = beyond+physical). Dr. Johnson was
unkind to this school. He thought that these poets only wanted to display their learning and to say
something which had not been said before.
It will be interesting here to mention that the future of metaphysical poetry is bright. Prof.
Ransom, an eminent critic of today meditating upon the nature of true poetry, has indicated that
metaphysical poetry is alone true poetry. In his treatise he concedes pure physical poetry as an
impossibility aiming at the ‘thinginess’ and also ‘Platonic poetry’ which is a false poetry dealing
with ideals and ideas alone. He prefers metaphysical poetry not because it represents the middle
way between the two, but because it produces a beautiful blend of the two.
of Sir Thomas Egerton. But before 1597, Donne enlisted as a volunteer in two combined military
and naval expeditions. The Cadiz Expedition of 1556 and Azore Expedition of 1597 show that he
was an adherent of the Earl of Essex His. The Storm and The Calm describe the experiences of his
voyage. It was during the expedition that he came in contact with Thomas, the eldest son of Sir
Thomas Egerton, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal. He served Egerton for four years as Secretary.
He would have got promotion and advancement in public service had he not committed the
indiscretion of contracting a run-away marriage with Anne More, daughter of Sir George More of
Losely and niece of Egerton’s second wife. Possibly Donne miscalculated, as he thought this
marriage would strengthen his claims to promotion. On the contrary, Egerton dismissed him from
service. The reconciliation with More, his father-in-law, saved him from a long imprisonment.
Donne’s conversion of Anglicanism
A word may be said about his conversion to Anglicanism. Brought up among the Catholics in
early age, his belief in the old faith struggled against the impact of the Established Church. Donne
was no hypocrite; he knew the shortcomings of the Church of Rome; his intellectual spirit
detached itself from Catholicism. His conversion to Anglicanism was not due to opportunism or
expediency but intellectual persuasion. Even then, in later life he felt, to some extent, a sort of
spiritual unrest:
Show me, dear Christ, thy spouse so bright and clear...
Donne’s hasty and imprudent marriage meant the loss of a promising and stable public
career. The years from 1601 to 1609 were full of fluctuating fortunes, when Donne had to depend
on the generosity of his patron, Sir Robert Drury, the Countess of Beford, Lord Hay, Robert Carr,
Earl of Somerset, who helped him in different ways. The Pseudo Martyr (1610) shows him
definitely on the Anglician side, trying to defend the oath of allegiance.
Two loves of Donne
Donne had two loves—poetry, the mistress of his youth, and Divinity, the wife of his mature
age. Equally remote he stood from the ascetic ideal. He believed in the joy of living and the
seduction of poetry. Donne followed the middle path between blind faith and reformation.
To adore or scorn an image, or protest,
May all be bad; doubt wisely; in strange way
To stand inquiring right is not to stray;
To sleep or run wrong is.
Donne’s satiric genius found expression in his satire on heresy and on women. In The
Progress of the Soul (1601), he traces the progress of the soul of heresy from the fall of Eve to the
reign of Queen Elizabeth. The career of Donne entered a prosperous phase by his entering the
Ministry of the Church of England in 1615. His steps to the altar, had cost him much misery and
anguish. His pursuits were now controversial but devout. His sermons and poems written during
this period reflect the complexity of his character, his varied erudition and his alert mind. The
letters in verse written to different persons reflect his moods and interests. These metaphysical
compliments and hyperboles need not make us forget the intensification of religious feeling and
inner experience which found expression in the Holy Sonets. His Divine Poems, likewise, show
the conflict of faith and reason, of hope and despair, and the penitence of a soul which has
undergone a purgation of emotional experience. And yet the last poems queerly blend harshness
with a sonorous harmony.
Some of his poems are in the amorous Cavalier tradition; such is his celebrated song Go and
Catch a Falling Star, which avers that no-where lives a woman true and fair. In something of the
same tradition is the poem Love’s Deity, beginning:
mind, and the preoccupation with morbid themes which exist in his poetry, and they are full of
the same out-of-the-way learning.
(C) THE PERSONALITY OF JOHN DONNE
Donne’s was a complex personality, abounding in good and bad qualities. In him, great
virtues and serious faults were inextricably mixed together. His merits often fascinate us; “his
weaknesses often repel us.” On the whole, in spite of, all his shortcomings and faults,we cannot
help feeling the fascination of Donne as a man. This monarch of wit will continue to find favour
with coming generations:
Here lies a King, that rul‘d as he thought fit,
The universal Monarch of wit;
Here lie two Flames, and both these, the best,
Apollo’s Tint, at last, the true
God’s Priest.’
John Donne’s versatility and complexity
It is hard to find among the English poets, a genius of such versatility and complexity as John
Donne. Brought up as a Catholic, Donne led a life of pleasure and promise as a young gallant in
the temple in London. He was, in the words of Sir Richard Barker, “not dissolute, but very great”,
a great visitor of ladies, a great frequenter of plays, a great writer of conceited verses. It was
impossible that “a vulgar soul should dwell in such promising features.” We have a portrait of this
young man as he appeared in 1591, holding a sword, possessing an eager and intellectual look,
with a Spanish lover’s motto, “Sooner dead than changed”. This portrait is in harmony with the
tenor of the poems of the period namely, the Song and Sonets. He was not quite sensual, he was
passionate and arrogant. In his poems, he lays little stress on the aesthetic element in passion. He
had little feeling for pure, and artistic beauty. But he ranges through the different moods of
passion—from the earthliest to the sublimest. There are poems of illicit love and seduction (as The
Extasy and The Perfume); of lover’s moods (“For Godsake hold your tongue and let me love”,
“Twice or thrice had I loved thee”), of Petrarchan love (like the Primrose, The
Relique and Twicknam Garden). It is possible that Donne paid compliments to the noble ladies
whom he knew, in the Petrarchan tradition. There are a few songs of the later period dealing with
love in a restrained and chastened mood, possibly written after his marriage with Anne More.
They are A Valediction and Sweetest love, I do not go. These poems possess the depth and
sweetness of pure love.
Influence of European literature on Donne
Donne’s personality was enriched by his residence abroad. His service as a volunteer in the
expeditions of Essex, and his stay in Italy and Spain opened up the treasures of European
literature to him, His library contained many volumes of foreign poets. He was extremely fond of
Spanish authors. The Renaissance strain in his genius made him welcome the fresh air offered by
contemporary writers.’
Influence on Donne’s personality by his conversion to Anglicanism
Donne’s conversion to Anglicanism and his ordination as Dean of St Paul’s should not be
construed as a swing of the pendulum, from a life of fun and pleasure to asceticism and
repentance. The basic characteristic of Donne is not change, rather it is the constancy of his
nature. His poems represent the balanced and harmonious development of life, the merging of
the body and the soul in religious experience.
seventeenth century were, true humanists; they believed in the Christian concept of human nature
and man’s dependence on God. The advance of knowledge, the discoveries and inventions of
science, were viewed by them as manifestations of the Divine Power. The circulation of blood, the
motion of the earth, the various natural phenomena only tended to show how man fitted in God’s
universe.
Donne’s humanism finds its best outlet in his hunger for knowledge and thirst for unravelling
the mystery of existence.
Thirst for that time, O, my insatiate soul
And serve thy thirst, with God’s safe-sealing Bowl.
Be thirsty still, and drink still till thou go,
To tho’ only Health, to be Hydroptique so
(The Second anniversary, Ll. 45-48)
Even in his disillusionment and despair, he finds his sheet-anchor in faith—”I am the man that
cannot despair, since Christ is the remedy.” And yet this thirst cannot be quenched, the search of
a truth is an arduous endeavour, a steep climb uphill:
On huge hill
Cragged, sod steep. Truth stand, and he that will
Reach her, about must, and about must go;
And what the hills suddenness resists, win so;
Yet strive so, that before age, death’s twilight
Thy soul rest, for none can work in that night.
—(Satire III, LI. 79-84)
Donne’s attitude to love is another aspect of his humanism. His love is not subject to time, nor his
beloved’s beauty liable to decay, as swift as that of the rose:
No spring, nor summer Beauty hath such grace,
As I have seen in one Autummal face
—(The Autumnall)
Donne’s intellectual curiosity enabled him to challenge accepted beliefs and conventions.
Donne’s dismissal and adversity shook for a time, his belief in humanism. This was responsible
for the gloomy strain and pessimistic note of his later writings. His craving for death, his inability
to reconcile flesh and spirit, his vacillation between faith and reason was but a temporary phase
due to unfavourable domestic circumstances. Donne regained his humanism by reconciliation of
matter with spirit
Donne does not belittle the world of the senses. Just as the alchemist distills the quintessence
from elemental matter, so the poet derives refined pleasure through the senses. To him, “the gifts
of the body are better than those of the mind’ and the joy of physical love as portrayed in The
Ecstasy is the mystical union of souls. The senses show the way though they are not the end of his
search—“They are ours, though they are not we”. As Mahood puts:” In this double hunger after
metaphysical knowledge and supersensory experience, Donne has a life-line.”
There is a strain of scepticism in Donne. He does not understand the mysteries through
reason but through intuition. He knows the invisible world which is as real as the visible one. He
realises man’s condition as not that of one fallen but redeemed. In his Devotions, Donne writes:
“Earth is the centre of my body. Heaven is the centre of my soul....As yet not in. As yet God
suspends me between Heaven and Earth, as a Meteor, and I am not in Heaven, because an earthly
body clogs me, and 1 am not in the Earth, because a heavenly soul sustains me.” His mind no
longer vacillates like the quivering needle of the mariner’s compass.
(E) DONNE AND THE ELIZABETHANS
Donne was a contemporary of Shakespeare and most of his work was written before 1593. He
was an Elizabethan, in the restricted sense of the term, and yet he gave a new direction to the
creative activity of his age.
Main features of Elizabethan poetry
Elizabethan poetry followed certain conventions—there was the Petrarchan tradition, the
pastoral convention, and the classical norms. There were advantages and disadvantages in these
conventions. Spenser’s mellifluousness, Sydney’s passionate outbursts and Marlowe’s mighty
line gave Elizabethan poetry a distinct and high place in English literature. Poetry gained in
intensity but lost in complexity or what T.S. Eliot called the “dissocation of sensibility”.
The sonnet sequences of the Elizabethan age flowed in the Petrarchan channel. The poet sang
of the pains and sorrows of love, the beauty of the beloved and her steady cruelty. The images
were borrowed from nature—rain, wind, fire, ice, and storm; from the classics and mythology--
Venus, Cupid, Cynthia and Apollo. Poetry became a tame and mechanical art, devoid of originality
and true feeling.
John Donne’s revolt against the Elizabethan poetry
By 1590, there were distinct indications of a revolt against the prevailing conventions in
poetry. The conventional themes and conceits no longer appealed to the readers. There was a
demand that the poet should go “back to nature”--to life itself--to appeal to the true lovers of
poetry. Sidney’s recipe--”Look in thy heart and write... ”. Drayton’s affirmation that he was no
“pickpurse of another’s wit” showed clearly a tendency towards realism. There was opposition
both to poetic themes, images, and styles. The bold bawdry of the Elizabethan poets, their
references to Greek gods and classical myths were held up to ridicule.
The reasons for the change in literary taste were not far to seek. The tone of the age by the
end of the sixteenth century was becoming sober and puritanical. The drama was insisting on a
realistic treatment of the problems of ethics and behaviour. The people wanted solid stuff--”more
matter with less art”.
Donne challenged the prevailing forms and conventions in Elizabethan poetry. He introduced
the “metaphysical lyric” On the whole, he was anti-Petrarchan, though at times, he wrote in the
Petrarchan vein. He represented the swing from the romantic to the sexual, in English love poetry.
His mood was similar to that of Shakespeare when the latter wrote the “dark-lady” sonnets. Donne
questioned the sonneteers’ constancy to their mistresses and ridiculed their Platonism which was
a mere pose. He dwelt on the delights of physical love. Moreover, Donne’s flair for satire showed
his impatience with the artificial and conventional love poetry. Carew commended Donne’s
purging the Muses’ garden of its “Pedantic weeds’’.
Donne was no iconoclast. He did not reject all that was Elizabethan but he presented the same
values in terms of contemporary life. Donne did not neglect the Elizabethan conceit. He revitalized
it by making it a vehicle of his logic and eloquence. Donne put common images to different uses,
for example, the image of the besieged fort which was usually associated with love he used in a
religious context.
I like an usurpt town to another due.
Labour to admit you, but, oh, to no end……
were fond of making plentiful references to Greek gods and goddesses like Cupid and Venus in
their love poetry.
Donne rebels against these stale and hackneyed conventions of love poetry; He rejects the
lofty cult of the woman. She is no deity or goddess to be worshipped. He ridicules and laughs at
her. This attitude is best revealed in The Song: “Go and catch a falling star”, where he says that
nowhere lives a woman true and fair, and that even the truest woman is false to several men. This
poem is a brilliant piece of mockery. Even in his defeat Donne rises superior to the woman. Her
faithlessness to him only makes her look stupid and cheap. In Twicknam Garden also, he refers
to woman as the perverse sex, and says that it is wrong to judge a woman’s thoughts by her tears.
In fact, his attitude in this poem is a mixture of scorn for the fair sex and praise for the particular
woman.
Donne’s use of conceits
A conceit is a pleasant, fantastic far-fetched idea, image or comparison. For instance, it would
be a conceit to say that cool wine laughs for joy because a charming woman’s lips will touch it
Similarly, when a lover talking of his love for his mistress says that if he were dead and buried and
if his mistress were only to walk over his grave, his very bones would stir and grow into a flower-
plant this is also a conceit
A conceit is a poetic ornament. Elizabethan poetry contains hundreds of conceits. Conceits
are found scattered throughout the works of Shakespeare and Sydney. In the eighteenth century,
however, conceits were not favoured.
Donne and his followers made an excessive use of conceits. While in Shakespeare or Sydney
a conceit is an ornament or an occasional grace, in Donne it is everywhere. It is his very genius,
and fashions his feeling and thought. Donne’s conceits are more intellectual than those of
Shakespeare or Sydney. It is chiefly on account of the excessive use of intellectual and far-fetched
conceits that Donne is known as a metaphysical poet. He employs scholastic, superstitious,
sceptical, theological, and mathematical conceits.
His use of strange and far-fetched conceits may be illustrated from the poems included in our
selected poems of Donne. In The Song the whole of the first stanza contains a series of conceits.
The poet asks us to catch a falling star, get a mandrake root and find out who cleft the devil’s foot.
In The Anniversary each of the lovers is a king with the other as the subject. In The Sun
Rising, the lover declares that he would have extinguished and eclipsed the sun-beams with a
wink but he cannot afford to miss the sight of his beloved even for a moment. The beloved in his
bed represents both the East Indies (known for spices) and the West Indies (known for diamond
mines), because she is fragrant like spices and bright like diamonds. The lover’s bed chamber is
the whole sphere of the sun because the entire earth is compressed there. In Twicknam
Garden, the poet’s love is like a spider which converts the beauty of spring into poison. The garden
is like paradise where his love, because of its poisonous quality, is like the serpent. The lover would
like to be some senseless object in order not to feel the pain of disappointment: he may be a
mandrake (an imaginary plant) or a stone fountain. His tears are the standard by which the taste
of the tears of all true lovers is to be tasted.
Being more often intellectual than emotional, these conceits make Donne’s poetry difficult.
We find it hard to get the meaning of most of his conceits without guidance of notes. They puzzle
and perplex us. At the same time when we succeed in understanding them, we feel a certain
pleasure as we feel after having solved a difficult mathematical problem. They make Donne’s
poetry obscure but at the same time a source of delight. They lend originality and novelty to his
poetry.
violence consists in his startling and unusual phrases which, however, sometimes harmonise with
his thoughts and emotions.”
On account of the obscurity of his style, Donne has also been likened to Robert Browning
whom he anticipated by two centuries. Ben Jonson said about Donne that “Donne would perish
through not being understood”. The bulk of Donne’s poetry “is distinguished by wit, profundity of
thought, erudition (scholarship) passion and subtlety, coupled with a certain roughness of form”.
Summary
"My Last Duchess" is narrated by the duke of Ferrara to an envoy (representative) of
another nobleman, whose daughter the duke is soon to marry. These details are
revealed throughout the poem, but understanding them from the opening helps to
illustrate the irony that Browning employs.
At the poem's opening, the duke has just pulled back a curtain to reveal to the envoy a
portrait of his previous duchess. The portrait was painted by Fra Pandolf, a monk and
painter whom the duke believes captured the singularity of the duchess's glance.
However, the duke insists to the envoy that his former wife’s deep, passionate glance
was not reserved solely for her husband. As he puts it, she was "too easily impressed"
into sharing her affable nature.
His tone grows harsh as he recollects how both human and nature could impress her,
which insulted him since she did not give special favor to the "gift" of his "nine-hundred-
years-old" family name and lineage. Refusing to deign to "lesson" her on her
unacceptable love of everything, he instead "gave commands" to have her killed.
The duke then ends his story and asks the envoy to rise and accompany him back to
the count, the father of the duke's impending bride and the envoy's employer. He
mentions that he expects a high dowry, though he is happy enough with the daughter
herself. He insists that the envoy walk with him "together" – a lapse of the usual social
expectation, where the higher ranked person would walk separately – and on their
descent he points out a bronze bust of the god Neptune in his collection.
Analysis
"My Last Duchess," published in 1842, is arguably Browning's most famous dramatic
monologue, with good reason. It engages the reader on a number of levels – historical,
psychological, ironic, theatrical, and more.
The most engaging element of the poem is probably the speaker himself, the duke.
Objectively, it's easy to identify him as a monster, since he had his wife murdered for
what comes across as fairly innocuous crimes. And yet he is impressively charming,
both in his use of language and his affable address. The ironic disconnect that colors
most of Browning's monologues is particularly strong here. A remarkably amoral man
nevertheless has a lovely sense of beauty and of how to engage his listener.
In fact, the duke's excessive demand for control ultimately comes across as his most
defining characteristic. The obvious manifestation of this is the murder of his wife. Her
crime is barely presented as sexual; even though he does admit that other men could
draw her "blush," he also mentions several natural phenomena that inspired her favor.
And yet he was driven to murder by her refusal to save her happy glances solely for
him. This demand for control is also reflected in his relationship with the envoy. The
entire poem has a precisely controlled theatrical flair, from the unveiling of the curtain
that is implied to precede the opening, to the way he slowly reveals the details of his
tale, to his assuming of the envoy's interest in the tale ("strangers like you….would ask
me, if they durst, How such a glance came there"), to his final shift in subject back to the
issue of the impending marriage. He pretends to denigrate his speaking ability – "even
had you skill in speech – (which I have not),” later revealing that he believes the
opposite to be true, even at one point explicitly acknowledging how controlled his story
is when he admits he "said 'Fra Pandolf' by design" to peak the envoy's interest. The
envoy is his audience much as we are Browning's, and the duke exerts a similar control
over his story that Browning uses in crafting the ironic disconnect.
In terms of meter, Browning represents the duke's incessant control of story by using a
regular meter but also enjambment (where the phrases do not end at the close of a
line). The enjambment works against the otherwise orderly meter to remind us that the
duke will control his world, including the rhyme scheme of his monologue.
To some extent, the duke's amorality can be understood in terms of aristocracy. The
poem was originally published with a companion poem under the title "Italy and France,"
and both attempted to explore the ironies of aristocratic honor. In this poem, loosely
inspired by real events set in Renaissance Italy, the duke reveals himself not only as a
model of culture but also as a monster of morality. His inability to see his moral ugliness
could be attributed to having been ruined by worship of a "nine-hundred-years-old
name.” He is so entitled that when his wife upset him by too loosely bestowing her favor
to others, he refused to speak to her about it. Such a move is out of the question –
"who'd stoop to blame this kind of trifling?" He will not "stoop" to such ordinary domestic
tasks as compromise or discussion. Instead, when she transgresses his sense of
entitlement, he gives commands and she is dead.
Another element of the aristocratic life that Browning approaches in the poem is that of
repetition. The duke's life seems to be made of repeated gestures. The most obvious is
his marriage – the use of the word "last" in the title implies that there are several others,
perhaps with curtain-covered paintings along the same hallway where this one stands.
In the same way that the age of his name gives it credence, so does he seem fit with a
life of repeated gestures, one of which he is ready to make again with the count's
daughter.
And indeed, the question of money is revealed at the end in a way that colors the entire
poem. The duke almost employs his own sense of irony when he brings up a "dowry" to
the envoy. This final stanza suggests that his story of murder is meant to give proactive
warning to the woman he is soon to marry, but to give it through a backdoor channel,
through the envoy who would pass it along to the count who might then pass it to the
girl. After all, the duke has no interest in talking to her himself, as we have learned! His
irony goes even further when he reminds the envoy that he truly wants only the woman
herself, even as he is clearly stressing the importance of a large dowry tinged with a
threat of his vindictive side.
But the lens of aristocracy undercuts the wonderful psychological nature of the poem,
which is overall more concerned with human contradictions than with social or economic
criticism. The first contradiction to consider is how charming the duke actually is. It
would be tempting to suggest Browning wants to paint him as a weasel, but knowing the
poet's love of language, it's clear that he wants us to admire a character who can
manipulate language so masterfully. Further, the duke shows an interesting
complication in his attitudes on class when he suggests to the envoy that they "go
Together down," an action not expected in such a hierarchical society. By no means can
we justify the idea that the duke is willing to transcend class, but at the same time he
does allow a transgression of the very hierarchy that had previously led him to have his
wife murdered rather than discuss his problems with her.
Also at play psychologically is the human ability to rationalize our hang-ups. The duke
seems controlled by certain forces: his own aristocratic bearing; his relationship to
women; and lastly, this particular duchess who confounded him. One can argue that the
duke, who was in love with his "last duchess,” is himself controlled by his social
expectations, and that his inability to bear perceived insult to his aristocratic name
makes him a victim of the same social forces that he represents. Likewise, what he
expects of his wives, particularly of this woman whose portrait continues to provide him
with fodder for performance, suggests a deeper psychology than one meant solely for
criticism.
The last thing to point out in the duke's language is his use of euphemism. The way he
explains that he had the duchess killed – "I gave commands; Then all smiles stopped
together" – shows a facility for avoiding the truth through choice of language. What this
could suggest is that the duchess was in fact guilty of greater transgression than he
claims, that instead of flirtation, she might have physically or sexually betrayed him.
There's certainly no explicit evidence of this, but at the same time, it's plausible that a
man as arrogant as the duke, especially one so equipped with the power of euphemism,
would avoid spelling out his disgrace to a lowly envoy and instead would speak around
the issue.
Finally, one can also understand this poem as a commentary on art. The duke remains
enamored with the woman he has had killed, though his affection now rests on a
representation of her. In other words, he has chosen to love the ideal image of her
rather than the reality, similar to how the narrator of "Porphyria's Lover" chose a static,
dead love than one destined to change in the throes of life. In many ways, this is the
artist's dilemma, which Browning explores in all of his work. As poet, he attempts to
capture contradiction and movement, psychological complexity that cannot be pinned
down into one object, and yet in the end all he can create is a collection of static lines.
The duke attempts to be an artist in his life, turning a walk down the hallway into a
performance, but he is always hampered by the fact that the ideal that inspires his
performance cannot change.
Robert Browning aspired to be a dramatist. He wrote eight dramas and all of them failed on the stage.
Browning’s genius was contemplating than dramatic. Its main reason was that neither Browning was so
mature for writing a drama nor was his audience. Browning made a practical compromise and decided
to write the drama of the soul – dramatic monologue. This drama is acted within the mind of the
character. It is not projected on the stage of a theatre. So, Browning interiorized the drama.
Dramatic monologue is different from a drama and a soliloquy. In drama the action is external but in
dramatic monologue, the action is internal and his soul is the stage. In a soliloquy, only one character
speaks to himself and there is no interference of any other character but in a monologue, one character
speaks his mind and the character is listening to him, but he is not interfering in the action.
Victorianism was an age of renaissance. It was an age when British colonies were being forced. British
Empire was reducing to England. So people were very much disturbed. The whole of the England was in
a state of crisis. There was also a restriction of the people that they could not discuss this issue with
others in public places. So there was a conflict in the minds of the people and they were thinking in their
minds of the people. They were thinking and talking only to themselves.
Browning wanted to present all this on the stage but in this period of gloominess it was not possible for
him to stage a drama. Even the intellectuals were not allowed to write on critical issues of the country.
Browning thought a very clever device and decided to write dramatic monologue. This was exactly the
situation of the people that they had a drama in their minds but they could not express it. So they were
only talking to themselves. Browning did not directly write about England rather he picked up the same
situation of Italian Renaissance, some 200 years earlier, in Italy. At that time Italy was passing through
the same critical situation as it was in the England in Browning’s times.
In this period every Englishman was suffering from a critical situation. Every individual was thinking
about the past glory of the England, there was a conflict in his mind. He was thinking about his present
and past. His soul was in confusion, he was thinking about the causes of this failure, he tried to give
some justifications and everyone had a sense of optimism in his mind though that might not be a false
one.
So we see that Browning’s characters are also representing the same situation of English people and the
pessimism of the age.
Browning’s dramatic monologue deals with the subject of failure. He takes a character who has been
failed in his life. He is caught up in crisis and now tells his story of crisis and bores out his soul before us.
The last rider, Fra Lippo Lippi, Bishop at his death bed and Andrea are the typical example of this kind.
Fra Lippo Lippi has been caught up in an area of prostitutes:
So, we see that Browning’s characters are in a conflict, they are in a critical situation and they now try to
cope up with their situation.
To deal out with this situation Browning presents the whole of his case. Browning shows us the past and
present of his character and how this character gets involved in this critical situation. So Browning
unfolds the whole of the life of his character to make it possible to analyze the history of the character.
This is Browning’s technique of case-making. The stronger is the case, the interesting will be the poem.
Through the technique of case-making, browning dissects the soul of his character and this technique of
soul dissection helps the reader to understand the character and clearly see why his character reaches
to this critical juncture.
We know that Fra was poor in his childhood and the guardian church was very strict with him. He had
been suppressed adversely in his life.
The last rider could not express his love to his beloved and won her.
Andrea deceived the French King, who was very kind to him.
“… … … … … … … … God is just.
King Francis may forgive me: … … …”
To conclude, Browning’s business is to render the soul or psyche of his protagonists and so he follows
the same technique as the modern impressionist. With the help of the technique of soul dissection, we
clearly see the soul of the character. In his monologues, Browning constantly strikes a curiously modern
note.
Much ink has been spilt in proving and disproving that Browning is an obscure poet. It is
hard to absolve Browning of the charge of unintelligibility and difficulty. In his own age, he
was considered very difficult and obscure and hence could not achieved popularity and
recognition like his contemporary Tennyson. “Sordellow” was regarded as more obscure
than any other poem in the English language. Mrs. Carlyle read the poem and could not
judge whether ‘Sordellow’ was a man, or a city, or a book. Douglas Jerrold, after reading it
said:
Browning certainly is a very difficult poet. Dawson calls him “the Carlyle of poetry”. Various
reasons are given for the obscurity and difficulty of his poetry. According to some critics,
obscurity of Browning’s poetry is
“… a piece of intellectual vanity indulged in more and more insolently as his years
and fame increased”.
“All the records of Browning’s long life and caret show that he was at all vain. All
his contemporaries agree that he never talked cleverly or tried to talk cleverly
which is always the case with a man who is intellectually vain. It is psychologically
improbable that the poet, made his poems, complicated from mere pride of his
powers and contempt of his readers.”
“Browning was not unintelligible because he was proud, but unintelligible because
he was humble.”
He was humble enough to think that what he knew was quite commonplace and was known
even to the man in the street. His own concepts were quite clear to him that he found
nothing difficult or profound in them.
Obscurity in Browning’s poetry results not from any one reason but from a number of
reasons.
Browning had a very high conception of his own calling. He once wrote to a friend:
He believed that a poet should try to put “the infinite within the finite”. It is not a kind of
poetry to be read merely to while way a leisure hour.
Browning was a highly original genius and his poetry was entirely different from
contemporaries.
Browning’s dramatic monologues are soul studies; they study the shifting moods and
changing thoughts of a developing soul. It is always soul dissection, it is thought, thought
and thought; and thought all the way. It is always “interior landscape” with no chronology
or background. Obviously such poetry is bound to be difficult. Browning’s long,
argumentative and philosophical poems are tiresome and boring.
This difficulty of comprehension is further increased by the fact that he was interested in the
queerest human soul, and tried to probe the odd and the abnormal in human psychology.
“He sought the sinners whom even the sinners had cast out”, and tried to show that even
they might be generous and humane. He tried to reveal the essential nobility and humanity
even of a mean impostor.
Browning was a very learned poet. His schooling was mostly private and so his learning was
more profound and thorough than of those who have been educated at school. He knew in
detail the history and geography not of one country, but of a number of countries. Many of
There is frequent use of Latin expressions and quotations; there are illusions to little known
literary, mythological, historical sources and information of Medieval and Renaissance art
and culture of Europe. Browning sought his object in many lands.
Often Browning’s metaphors, similes and illustrations are far-fetched and recondite as in
“Two in the Campagna” and in “Memorabilia”.
Often Browning’s writes a telegraphic style. Relative, prepositions, articles, even pronouns
are left out. It might be that his pen failed to keep pace with the rush of his ideas, but such
telegraphic style is certainly confusing and bewildering for his readers.
Browning’s frequent inversions and the use of long, involved sentences, heavily overloaded
with parentheses, create almost insurmountable difficulties in the way of his readers. In
poems like “The Grammarian’s Funeral”, he not only buries the grammarian but also
grammar.
Frequently, he coins new words, uses unusual compounds and expressions and is too
colloquial, jerky, abrupt and rugged.
When his “Sordellow” first appeared, he was accused of verbosity and since then he made it
his rule to use only two words where ten were needed. He admits this complexity of his
poetry in “Rabbi Ben Ezra”.
However, the obscurity of Browning’s poetry must not be exaggerated. As Duffin, points
out, the majority of Browning’s shorter poems are read as easily as the verse of Tennyson.
Poems like “Evelyn Hope”, “The Last Rise Together”, “The Patriot”, “Prophyria’s Lover”,
“Prospice”, “My Last Duchess”, “Home Thoughts, from Abroad” etc are perfectly lucid and
simple. The intelligent reader can enjoy most of his lyrics and longer poems in blank verse
after a little mental adjustment. Even in these thorniest poems there are passages of great
originality and eloquence of classical beauty and easy comprehension.
Victorian Age is a watershed age in English literature. As there is the influence of Classicism,
Therefore, there are a lot of confusions and conflicts in this age. There are the conflicts
between art and life, art and morality, content and form, man and woman, classic education
and progressive education, flesh and spirit, body and soul and what not.
In this entire prevailed situation, Browning remains unaffected by these confusions and
conflicts. He is at heart an optimist. His optimism is clear even in his style of writing a poem
that he always picks up his central character in crisis or in some critical situation, then this
crisis reaches the climax and ultimately resolved and he ends his poem with optimism. As in
his poem “Patriot into Traitor”, he says:
Browning is a very consistent thinker of optimistic philosophy of life. His poetry has
immense variety, but his unchanging philosophical view of human destiny gives unity to it.
He does not challenge the old dogmas. He accepts the conventional view of God, the
immortality of the soul, and the Christian belief in incarnation.
Browning’s optimism is founded on the realities of life. It is not ‘blind’ as he does not shut
his eyes to the evil prevailing in daily life routine. He knows that human life is a mixture of
good and evil, of love and the ugliness, of despair and hopefulness, but he derives hope
from this very imperfection of life. His optimism “is founded on imperfections of man”. In
the famous lines of “Pippa Passes”, he says:
Browning believes that experience leads to enrichment. His attitude towards evil, pain and
misery is not merely abstract. He does not accept evil merely as a practical instrument of
human advancement. His approach is pragmatic as it is based on the actual experience of
life. He tests every theory on the touchstone of pragmatism. Browning believes that it is not
achievement, but it is struggle that empowers man in life.
His optimism is based on his theory of evolution that life is constantly progressing to higher
and higher levels. Man progresses in the moral and spiritual sense through persistent
struggle against evil. He says that evil is our foe, and no victory is possible over the foe. Evil
is the opportunity offered to us by the divine power to advance spirituality.
Browning believes that this life is a preparation for the life to come. In “Evelyn Hope”, the
lover does not despair as he derives consolation from the optimistic faith that “God creates
the love to reward the love”. True love is sure to be rewarded in the life after death, if not in
this life.
Browning’s optimism is firmly based on his faith in the immortality of the soul. The body
may die but the soul lives on in the Infinite. Life, in the other world, is far more valuable
than life in this finite world. This ideal which is attainable here is worthless, for by attaining
it here, we shall not deserve to attain it there in the next world.
Browning believes in the futility of this worldly life. He thinks that failure serves as a source
of inspiration for progress as in “Andrea Del Sarto”:
Browning’s firm faith in God is beyond any doubt. He is never sceptical about the existence
of God controlling the world. Even his knaves have firm faith in God, and rely upon His
mercy. They constantly talk of their relation with God, and are sure of their ultimate union
with Him. It is love which harmonizes all living beings. It is on love that all Browning’s
characters build their faith saying:
Life in this world is worth living because both life and the world are the expressions of
Divine Love. The world is beautiful as God created it out of the fullness of His love.
Browning’s optimism finds the passion of joy no one has sung more fervently than Browning
of the delight of life. David in “Saul”, Pippa in “Pippa Passes”, Lippo in “Fra Lippo Lippi” and
a host of other poems are keenly alive to the pleasure of living. The Rabbi in “Rabbi Ben
Ezra” condemns the aesthetic negation of the flesh, and asserts the necessity and moral
usefulness of the flesh and the soul:
So, we can safely conclude the Browning speaks out the strongest words of optimistic faith
in his Victorian Age of scepticism and pessimism. Of all English poets, no other is so
Despite, all this we call him as an optimist because of his firm faith in God.
His poems are full of courage and inspiration, telling people that there are no difficulties if
they have self-dependence and self-control. It was a good omen for English literature that
the two leaders in Poetry, Tennyson and Browning differed from on another. Tennyson was
at heart a pessimist. But Browning was at heart a strong optimist.
Hamlet’s soliloquy
To be, or not to be? That is the question—
Because who would bear all the trials and tribulations of time—
[To OPHELIA] Beauty, may you forgive all my sins in your prayers.
Analysis:
Hamlet’s “To be, or not to be…” soliloquy is possibly the most famous and most quoted
speech in all of English literature. In the soliloquy, Hamlet contemplates the disparities
of the human world, the attraction of suicide, cowardice, revenge and the human
conscience. The harrowing thoughts expressed by our young prince embody a large
number of the play’s themes, and indeed they reveal a vast amount about the hero’s
character. The language itself demonstrates Hamlet’s perceptive, intelligent but also
(and perhaps consequently) melancholic character and hopeless attitude to life. These
aspects of his personality are demonstrated throughout the play, particularly in his
soliloquys, and the concerns he expresses about death and revenge are also recurring
themes of Hamlet.
Hamlet begins his soliloquy with the famous aphorism, “To be, or not to be, that is the
question…” This rather extreme simplification of an almost impossible question
immediately conveys Hamlet’s perturbed state of mind: suicide is a genuine option at
this point. It has come down to a simple choice that needs to be made: life or death, and
the audience mourns to witness Hamlet’s appearing to sway towards the option of
suicide, which is described as warring against and so ending “a sea of troubles”. This
natural metaphor intimates not only the enormity of his troubles, but also their potency
and uncontrollability. He presents death as alluring and attractive, metaphorically
comparing it to sleep, certainly more appealing and natural than death. Hamlet also
refers to “The sling and arrows of outrageous fortune,” depicting life as a cruel battle
and immediately recalling his earlier exclamation in Act I, Scene 5: “O cursèd spite, |
That ever I was born to set it right.” He goes on to describe “the whips and scorns of
time, | Th’oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely…” giving an extensive list of
all the world’s disparities and problems.
Hamlet’s first soliloquy, in Act I, also relates the harsh cruelties of our lives. Again, he
seems to be swaying towards the notion of suicide when he exclaims: “O that this too
too solid flesh would melt, | … | Or that the Everlasting had not fixed | His canon ‘gainst
self-slaughter.” The threat of damnation is thus presented by Hamlet as the only reason
for not killing oneself, and his hyperbolic repetition of ‘too’ shows his desperation. He
describes the uses of the world as “weary, stale, flat and unprofitable.” It is worth noting
that “weary” is a word he repeats in the fifth soliloquy. Hamlet’s depiction of the world as
rotten and stale (a motif that recurs throughout the play, particularly in describing
Denmark) accompanied by his exclamations (“Fie on’t, ah fie,”), emphasises his
melancholic state of mind. He later describes Denmark as a prison (page 141) with
“many confines, wards, and dungeons…” This, too, demonstrates his despair and his
consequent desire for escape, and perhaps suicide. Thus, the language employed by
Hamlet in his fifth soliloquy reflects the ideas expressed regarding death and suicide in
various other parts of the play.
Hamlet’s fascination with death and its uncertainty is another motif that recurs
throughout the play. In his fifth soliloquy, Hamlet, although seemingly attracted towards
death (“To die, to sleep – | No more…”), realises:
There is a suggestion here of risk and the idea that the dream of death could in fact be
a nightmare. Moreover, Hamlet’s use of the word “us” rather than “me” universalises
Shakespeare’s explorations of Hamlet’s mind into explorations of the human condition,
implying that these ideas are felt by all at some point or other. Hamlet goes on to
question why people would bear life’s problems if “he himself might his quietus make |
With a bare bodkin?” It is this “dread of something after death” that helps to make the
question of “To be, or not to be” much more complex than Hamlet at first believes. He
would rather bear the ills that he currently experiences “Than fly to others that we know
not of…” Life is here presented as the lesser of two evils, since the unknown may be
even worse. These gloomy ideas of death are perhaps inspired by the Ghost’s
descriptions of his own purgatorial afterlife: he is “Doomed for a certain term to walk the
night, | And for the day confined to fast in fires…” It is somewhat ironic that Hamlet
should describe death as “The undiscovered country from whose bourn | No traveller
returns,” since he has only just seen his own father returned from the dead.
Shakespeare could be suggesting that the Ghost that Hamlet saw was not really a
“traveller”, but in fact the devil himself, a concern raised in Hamlet’s fourth soliloquy.
Hamlet’s fascination with death is demonstrated again in Act 5 Scene 1, the famous
grave scene. Hamlet questions how the Clown could possibly be singing while digging
graves, which he sees as harsh and unfeeling. He is angered by the way the Clown
treats the skulls, asking: “Did these bones cost no more the breeding but to play at
loggets with ‘em? Mine ache to think on’t.” Hamlet is amazed (emphasised by his
repeated questioning) that such important people as politicians, Lords and lawyers
should be treated with such disrespect by a “rude knave”. Perhaps he himself feels
threatened by the great irony of death: that everyone, even Princes, are reduced and
equalised by the great powers of nature. These ideas are expressed again when
Hamlet, after seeing Yorick’s skull, reflects upon the cruelty of death: “To what base
uses we may return, Horatio! Why may not imagination trace the noble dust of
Alexander, till a find it stopping a bunghole?” The suggestion is that Hamlet is thinking
of his own death and afterlife and how his body will be treated. These reflections show
Hamlet’s fascination and fear of death, also demonstrated through the language of his
fifth soliloquy.
Hamlet’s fear of death and its uncertainty is what causes him to delay. He is an
intelligent and sharp young man unlikely to act without due consideration: it is this
discernment in his character, demonstrated in his fifth soliloquy, that prevents him from
committing suicide. He takes care to question a number of aspects of suicide: whether
God would approve (his first soliloquy), and whether it would be considered “nobler” to
“suffer | The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune” or to kill himself, and here we see
his feeling of duty as a Prince and as the son of his virtuous father. He explains:
It is the scholar’s predicament that “enterprises of great pitch and moment | … turn
awry” once contemplated and considered at length. This intelligence, shown throughout
the play, also leads to Hamlet’s delaying in his resolution to avenge his father’s death.
In Act 2 Scene 2, Hamlet, comparing himself to the passionate player, accuses himself
of having no resolve and for being “unpregnant” of his cause. He casts aspersions on
his own manliness by exclaiming: “Am I a coward?” and asking who “Plucks of my
beard and blows it in my face, | Tweaks me by th’nose…” Then, in an effort to emulate
the powerful emotions of the First Player, he pours out a splurge of anger: “Bloody,
bawdy villain! | Remorseless, treacherous, lecherous, kindless villain!” He soon realises,
however, that his outburst of words is futile without action: “Fie upon’t, foh! About, my
brains.” His discernment leads him to delay and question the nature and intentions of
the Ghost, which “May be a devil” and may be trying to damn him. Thus he decides
upon the play, in which he might “catch the conscience of the king.” The audience can
see that he is not delaying simply due to cowardice. Rather, it is because of his
intelligence and his consequent uncertainty about the Ghost. Intelligence is also seen
as the cause of delay in various other parts of the play. Even once he has seen
Claudius’s reaction to the play, which surely serves as a proof of his guilt, he ensures
that Horatio too agrees and asks: “Didst perceive?” As an intelligent man, Hamlet wants
absolute evidence of Claudius’s guilt before he makes any rash decisions, for he knows
that if he was to wrongly commit murder then he would be eternally damned. Henry
Mackenzie describes Hamlet as a man of exquisite sensibility and virtue “placed in a
situation in which even the amiable qualities of his mind serve but to aggravate his
distress and to perplex his conduct.” It is his discernment and forward thinking, the
“amiable qualities of his mind,” not cowardice, that makes him “lose the name of action”,
and these characteristics are skilfully portrayed in the fifth soliloquy.
Hamlet’s fifth soliloquy also returns to the play’s central theme: revenge and its
justification. Unlike Vindice, who only seems to realise the sinful nature of his
murderous vengeance at the end of the play, Hamlet questions throughout whether
revenge is justified. Therefore, his use of the word “conscience” (“Thus conscience does
make cowards of us all…”) can in fact be seen as a reference to his moral uncertainty
about whether revenge is good or evil. Indeed, less than ten lines before Hamlet’s
speech begins, after Polonius’s speech about sugaring over the devil, Claudius himself
exclaims: “Oh, ‘tis too true. | How smart a lash that speech doth give my conscience!”
and he goes onto cry: “O heavy burden!” And so, Hamlet’s own use of the word
“conscience” immediately encourages a comparison between Claudius and Hamlet,
both polarised in the extent to which they allow their consciences to determine their
action. While, as Hamlet explains, conscience may lead to cowardice, it also sets us
apart from evil. Claudius, although saying: “My stronger guilt defeats my strong intent,”
refuses to give up what he has gained from his fraternal murder: “May one be pardoned
and retain th’offence?” Despite claiming that he does have a conscience, he never acts
upon it, even to the extent that, when Gertrude proposes to drink from the poisonous
cup, all he can bring himself to say is: “Gertrude, do not drink!” He is heartless and
cruel, and it is this that separates him from Hamlet.
However, Hamlet is not completely devoid of flaws: although questioning the morality of
vengeance (as when he asks the ghost: “Do you not come your tardy son to chide…”
and describes revenge as his “dread command”), he does not seem to realise that by
killing Claudius he effectively, some would argue, sinks to his level. Herman Ulrici points
out that it would be a sin to put Claudius to death without a trial and without justice.
However, is this necessarily true? Claudius has killed Hamlet’s father, and has also
attempted to kill Hamlet himself, and so one could argue that Hamlet, by killing
Claudius, is simply preventing further deaths, and thus that revenge is somewhat
justified. Nonetheless, Hamlet’s occasional lack of conscience is undeniable: his cruelty
to the women of the play is a good example of this. Despite his father’s beseeching him:
“Taint not thy mind, nor let thy soul contrive | against thy mother aught…” he still grows
angry at her for marrying Claudius. This cruelty to his mother is particularly evident
when he unremittingly questions her about her actions, asking, amongst other things: “O
shame, where is thy blush? Rebellious hell…” We begin to pity her as she begs him
repeatedly to “speak no more” and tells him:
Even when the ghost begs Hamlet to “step between her and her fighting soul,” he
continues to attack her for her actions. However, he does tell her later that he “must be
cruel only to be kind,” and so we begin to understand the teleology of his attacks – he
simply wishes to metaphorically heal his mother of her sins. In the case of Ophelia, on
the other hand, there is little justification for his cruelty: he simply uses her as a pawn for
his plans. Ophelia believes and is “so affrighted” by everything that Hamlet says to her
in his “antic disposition”. Hamlet’s least admirable side is seen in Act 3 Scene 3 when
he refuses to kill the praying Claudius, fearing that, if he does, Claudius will be sent to
heaven. Instead, he resolves to kill him “When he is drunk asleep, or in his rage, | Or in
th’incestuous pleasure of his bed…” He wants Claudius to be “about some act | That
has no relish of salvation in’t…” Murder is not enough for Hamlet – he wants to ensure
that Claudius experiences the true horrors of Hell that he feels he deserves. Dr Johnson
(1765) spoke of the “useless and wanton cruelty” of Hamlet’s treatment of Ophelia, and
he says that Hamlet’s speech in the prayer scene is “too horrible to be read or to be
uttered”. It is, indeed, an awful thought, but there is some sense of justice in the idea:
surely it is not true revenge if Hamlet’s father goes to Hell and Claudius goes to
Heaven, when it should surely be the other way around? Thus, the debate comes down
to the morality of revenge, a debate impossible to conclude. However, the critic
Maynard Mack (‘The World of Hamlet’) seems to present a fair argument: “The act
required of him, though retributive justice, is one that necessarily involves the doer in
the general guilt.” Although the inner play reveals to Hamlet Claudius’s guilt, the
question of revenge and its morality still remains: how does one revenge a murder
without becoming a murderer oneself?
The language of Hamlet’s fifth soliloquy thus serves to expand and elucidate many of
his traits already displayed in the play, and it prepares the audience for his actions later
on. It reveals Hamlet’s fear of and fascination with death, his discernment and
intelligence, as well as inviting a comparison between himself and Claudius (through the
word “conscience”). It is obvious from the outset that Hamlet is the more admirable of
the two, but Hamlet is certainly not perfect. Indeed, as Aristotle says, every tragic hero
must have a ‘hamartia’ (error of judgement or tragic flaw), otherwise the audience will
be left with a sense of total injustice and outrage. Shakespeare places Hamlet in a
situation almost impossible to navigate safely: perhaps we are too harsh in our
judgements of Hamlet? Is it not part of the human condition to desire some form of
retribution? Whatever the answer, it is clear from Hamlet’s “To be, or not to be…”
speech that he is an intelligent young man with an active, although occasionally failing,
conscience – surely he is admirable for this?
Thomas Gray was born in London on December 26, 1716. He was the only one of
twelve children who survived into adulthood. His father, Philip, a scrivener (a person
who copies text) was a cruel, violent man, but his mother, Dorothy, believed in her son
and operated a millinery business to educate him at Eton school in his childhood and
Peterhouse College, Cambridge, as a young man.
He left the college in 1738 without a degree to tour Europe with his friend, Horace
Walpole, the son of the first prime minister of England, Robert Walpole (1676-1745).
However, Gray did earn a degree in law although he never practiced in that profession.
After achieving recognition as a poet, he refused to give public lectures because he was
extremely shy. Nevertheless, he gained such widespread acclaim and respect that
England offered him the post of poet laureate, which would make him official poet of the
realm. However, he rejected the honor. Gray was that rare kind of person who cared
little for fame and adulation.
Type of Work
"Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard" is—as the title indicates—an elegy. Such a
poem centers on the death of a person or persons and is, therefore, somber in tone. An
elegy is lyrical rather than narrative—that is, its primary purpose is to express feelings
and insights about its subject rather than to tell a story. Typically, an elegy expresses
feelings of loss and sorrow while also praising the deceased and commenting on the
meaning of the deceased's time on earth. Gray's poem reflects on the lives of humble
and unheralded people buried in the cemetery of a church.
Setting
The time is the mid 1700s, about a decade before the Industrial Revolution began in
England. The place is the cemetery of a church. Evidence indicates that the church is
St. Giles, in the small town of Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, in southern England.
Gray himself is buried in that cemetery. William Penn, the founder of Pennsylvania,
once maintained a manor house at Stoge Poges.
Gray began writing the elegy in 1742, put it aside for a while, and finished it in 1750.
Robert Dodsley published the poem in London in 1751. Revised or altered versions of
the poem appeared in 1753, 1758, 1768, and 1775. Copies of the various versions are
on file in the Thomas Gray Archive at Oxford University.
Notes
(1) Curfew: ringing bell in the evening that reminded people in English towns of Gray’s
time to put out fires and go to bed. (2) Knell: mournful sound. (3) Parting day: day's end;
dying day; twilight; dusk. (4) Lowing: mooing. (5) O'er: contraction for over. (6) Lea:
meadow.
Stanza 2
5. Now fades the glimm'ring landscape on the sight,
6. And all the air a solemn stillness holds,
7. Save where the beetle wheels his droning flight,
8. And drowsy tinklings lull the distant folds.
Notes
(1) Line 5: The landscape becomes less and less visible. (2) Sight . . . solemn stillness .
. . save: alliteration. (3) Save: except. (4) Beetle: winged insect that occurs in more than
350,000 varieties. One type is the firefly, or lightning bug. (5) Wheels: verb meaning
flies in circles. (6) Droning: humming; buzzing; monotonous sound. (7) Drowsy tinklings
lull the distant folds: This clause apparently refers to the gentle sounds made by a bell
around the neck of a castrated male sheep that leads other sheep. A castrated male
sheep is called a wether. Such a sheep with a bell around its neck is called a
bellwether. Folds is a noun referring to flocks of sheep. (8) Tinklings: onomatopoeia.
Stanza 3
9. Save that from yonder ivy-mantled tow'r
10. The moping owl does to the moon complain
11. Of such, as wand'ring near her secret bow'r,
12. Molest her ancient solitary reign.
Notes
(1) Save: except. (2) Yonder: distant; remote. (3) Ivy-mantled: cloaked, dressed, or
adorned with ivy. (4) Moping: gloomy; grumbling. (5) Of such: of anything or anybody.
(6) Bow'r: bower, an enclosure surrounded by plant growth—in this case, ivy. (7) Molest
her ancient solitary reign: bother the owl while it keeps watch over the churchyard and
countryside. (8) Her ancient solitary rein: metaphor comparing the owl to a queen.
Stanza 4
13. Beneath those rugged elms, that yew-tree's shade,
14. Where heaves the turf in many a mould'ring heap,
15. Each in his narrow cell for ever laid,
16. The rude forefathers of the hamlet sleep.
Notes
(1) Where heaves the turf: anastrophe, a figure of speech that inverts the normal word
order (the turf heaves). (2) Mould'ring: mouldering (British), moldering (American), an
adjective meaning decaying, crumbling. (3) Cell: metaphor comparing a grave to a
prison cell. (4) Rude: robust; sturdy; hearty; stalwart. (4) Hamlet: village.
Stanza 5
17. The breezy call of incense-breathing Morn,
18. The swallow twitt'ring from the straw-built shed,
19. The cock's shrill clarion, or the echoing horn,
20. No more shall rouse them from their lowly bed.
Notes
(1) Breezy call of incense-breathing Morn: wind carrying the pleasant smells of morning,
including dewy grass and flowers. Notice that Morn is a metaphor comparing it to a
living creature. (It calls and breathes.) (2) Swallow: Insect-eating songbird that likes to
perch. (3) Clarion: cock-a-doodle-doo. (4) Echoing horn: The words may refer to the
sound made by a fox huntsman who blows a copper horn to which pack hounds
respond.
Stanza 6
21. For them no more the blazing hearth shall burn,
22. Or busy housewife ply her evening care:
23. No children run to lisp their sire's return,
24. Or climb his knees the envied kiss to share.
Notes
(1) hearth . . . housewife . . . her: alliteration. (2) Climb his knees the envied kiss to
share: anastrophe, a figure of speech that inverts the normal word order (to share the
envied kiss).
Stanza 7
25. Oft did the harvest to their sickle yield,
26. Their furrow oft the stubborn glebe has broke;
27. How jocund did they drive their team afield!
28. How bow'd the woods beneath their sturdy stroke!
Notes
(1) Sickle: Harvesting tool with a handle and a crescent-shaped blade. Field hands
swing it from right to left to cut down plant growth. (2) Furrow: channel or groove made
by a plow for planting seeds. (3) Glebe: earth. (4) Jocund: To maintain the meter, Gray
uses an adjective when the syntax call for an adverb, jocundly. Jocund (pronounced
JAHK und) means cheerful.
Stanza 8
29. Let not Ambition mock their useful toil,
30. Their homely joys, and destiny obscure;
31. Nor Grandeur hear with a disdainful smile
32. The short and simple annals of the poor.
Notes
(1) Ambition: Personification referring to the desire to succeed or to ambitious people
seeking lofty goals. (2) Destiny obscure: the humble fate of the common people; their
unheralded deeds. (3) Lines 29-30: anastrophe, a figure of speech that inverts the
normal word order (let not Ambition obscure their destiny and homely joys).
(4) Grandeur: personification referring to people with wealth, social standing, and
power. (5) Annals: historical records; story.
Stanza 9
33. The boast of heraldry, the pomp of pow'r,
34. And all that beauty, all that wealth e'er gave,
Stanza 10
37. Nor you, ye proud, impute to these the fault,
38. If Mem'ry o'er their tomb no trophies raise,
39. Where thro' the long-drawn aisle and fretted vault
40. The pealing anthem swells the note of praise.
Notes
(1) Impute: Assign, ascribe. (2) Mem'ry: Memory, a personification referring to
memorials, commemorations, and tributes—including statues, headstones, and
epitaphs—used to preserve the memory of important or privileged people. (3) Where
thro' . . . the note of praise: Reference to the interior of a church housing the tombs of
important people. Fretted vault refers to a carved or ornamented arched roof or ceiling.
(4) Pealing anthem may refer to lofty organ music.
Stanza 11
41. Can storied urn or animated bust
42. Back to its mansion call the fleeting breath?
43. Can Honour's voice provoke the silent dust,
44. Or Flatt'ry soothe the dull cold ear of Death?
Notes
(1) Storied urn: Vase adorned with pictures telling a story. Urns have sometimes been
used to hold the ashes of a cremated body. (2) Bust: sculpture of the head, shoulders,
and chest of a human. (3) Storied urn . . . breath? Can the soul (fleeting breath) be
called back to the body (mansion) by the urn or bust back? Notice that urn and bust are
personifications that call. (4) Can Honour's . . . Death? Can honor (Honour's voice)
attributed to the dead person cause that person (silent dust) to come back to life? Can
flattering words (Flatt'ry) about the dead person make death more "bearable"? (5)
General meaning of stanza: Lines 41-45 continue the idea begun in Lines 37-40. In
other words, can any memorials—such as the trophies mentioned in Line 38, the urn
and bust mentioned in Line 41, and personifications (honor and flattery) mentioned in
Lines 43 and 44—bring a person back to life or make death less final or fearsome?
Stanza 12
45. Perhaps in this neglected spot is laid
46. Some heart once pregnant with celestial fire;
47. Hands, that the rod of empire might have sway'd,
48. Or wak'd to ecstasy the living lyre.
Notes
(1) Pregnant with celestial fire: Full of great ideas, abilities, or goals (celestial fire). (2)
Rod of empire: scepter held by a king or an emperor during ceremonies. One of the
humble country folk in the cemetery might have become a king or an emperor if he had
been given the opportunity. (3) Wak'd . . .lyre: Played beautiful music on a lyre, a
stringed instrument. In other words, one of the people in the cemetery could have
become a great musician if given the opportunity, "waking up" the notes of the lyre.
Stanza 13
49. But Knowledge to their eyes her ample page
50. Rich with the spoils of time did ne'er unroll;
51. Chill Penury repress'd their noble rage,
52. And froze the genial current of the soul.
Notes
(1) Knowledge . . . unroll: Knowledge did not reveal itself to them (their eyes) in books
(ample page) rich with treasures of information (spoils of time). (2) Knowledge . . .
unroll: Personification and anastrophe a figure of speech that inverts the normal word
order (knowledge did ne'er enroll). (3) Chill . . . soul: Poverty (penury) repressed their
enthusiasm (rage) and froze the flow (current) of ideas (soul).
Stanza 14
53. Full many a gem of purest ray serene,
54. The dark unfathom'd caves of ocean bear:
55. Full many a flow'r is born to blush unseen,
56. And waste its sweetness on the desert air.
Note
Full . . . air: These may be the most famous lines in the poem. Gray is comparing the
humble village people to undiscovered gems in caves at the bottom of the ocean and to
undiscovered flowers in the desert.
Stanza 15
57. Some village-Hampden, that with dauntless breast
58. The little tyrant of his fields withstood;
59. Some mute inglorious Milton here may rest,
60. Some Cromwell, guiltless of his country's blood.
Notes
(1) John Hampden (1594-1643). Hampden, a Puritan member of Parliament, frequently
criticized and opposed the policies of King Charles I. In particular, he opposed a tax
imposed by the king to outfit the British navy. Because he believed that only Parliament
could impose taxes, he refused to pay 20 shillings in ship money in 1635. Many joined
him in his opposition. War broke out between those who supported Parliament and
those who supported the king. Hampden was killed in battle in 1643. Gray here is
presenting Hampden as a courageous (dauntless) hero who stood against the king (little
tyrant). (2) Milton: John Milton (1608-1674), the great English poet and scholar.
Stanza 16
61. Th' applause of list'ning senates to command,
62. The threats of pain and ruin to despise,
63. To scatter plenty o'er a smiling land,
64. And read their hist'ry in a nation's eyes,
Notes
The subject and verb of Lines 61-64 are in the first three words of Line 65, their lot
forbade. Thus, this stanza says the villagers' way of life (lot) prohibited or prevented
them from receiving applause from politicians for good deeds such as alleviating pain
and suffering and providing plenty (perhaps food) across the land. These deeds would
have been recorded by the appreciating nation.
Stanza 17
65. Their lot forbade: nor circumscrib'd alone
66. Their growing virtues, but their crimes confin'd;
67. Forbade to wade through slaughter to a throne,
68. And shut the gates of mercy on mankind,
Note
General meaning: Their lot in life not only prevented (circumbscrib'd) them from doing
good deeds (like those mentioned in Stanza 16) but also prevented (confin'd) bad deeds
such as killing enemies to gain the throne and refusing to show mercy to people.
Stanza 18
69. The struggling pangs of conscious truth to hide,
70. To quench the blushes of ingenuous shame,
71. Or heap the shrine of Luxury and Pride
72. With incense kindled at the Muse's flame.
Notes
(1) General meaning: This stanza continues the idea begun in the previous stanza,
saying that the villagers' lot in life also prevented them from hiding truth and shame and
from bragging or using pretty or flattering words (incense kindled at the Muse's flame) to
gain luxuries and feed their pride. (2) Muse's flame: an allusion to sister goddesses in
Greek and Roman mythology who inspired writers, musicians, historians, dancers, and
astronomers. These goddesses were called Muses.
Stanza 19
73. Far from the madding crowd's ignoble strife,
Stanza 20
77. Yet ev'n these bones from insult to protect,
78. Some frail memorial still erected nigh,
79. With uncouth rhymes and shapeless sculpture deck'd,
80. Implores the passing tribute of a sigh.
Note
General meaning: But even these people have gravestones (frail memorial), although
they are engraved with simple and uneducated words or decked with humble sculpture.
These gravestones elicit a sigh from people who see them.
Stanza 21
81. Their name, their years, spelt by th' unletter'd muse,
82. The place of fame and elegy supply:
83. And many a holy text around she strews,
84. That teach the rustic moralist to die.
Notes
(1)Their . . . supply: Their name and age appear but there are no lofty tributes. (2)
Unletter'd muse: Uneducated writer or engraver. (2) Holy text: probably Bible
quotations. (3) She: muse. See the second note for Stanza 18. (4) Rustic moralist: pious
villager.
Stanza 22
85. For who to dumb Forgetfulness a prey,
Stanza 23
89. On some fond breast the parting soul relies,
90. Some pious drops the closing eye requires;
91. Ev'n from the tomb the voice of Nature cries,
92. Ev'n in our ashes live their wonted fires.
Note
General meaning: The dying person (parting soul) relies on a friend (fond breast) to
supply the engraved words (pious drops) on a tombstone. Even from the tomb the spirit
of a person cries out for remembrance.
Stanza 24
93. For thee [32], who mindful of th' unhonour'd Dead
94. Dost in these lines their artless tale relate;
95. If chance, by lonely contemplation led,
96. Some kindred spirit shall inquire thy fate [33],
Notes
(1) For thee . . . relate: Gray appears to be referring to himself. Mindful that the villagers
deserve some sort of memorial, he is telling their story (their artless tale) in this elegy
(these lines). (2) Lines 95-96: But what about Gray himself? What if someone asks
about his fate? Gray provides the answer in the next stanza.
Stanza 25
97. Haply some hoary-headed swain may say,
Stanza 26
101. "There at the foot of yonder nodding beech
102. That wreathes its old fantastic roots so high,
103. His listless length at noontide would he stretch,
104. And pore upon the brook that babbles by.
Notes
(1) Nodding: bending; bowing. (2) Listless length: his tired body. (3) Pore upon: Look at;
watch.
Stanza 27
105. "Hard by yon wood, now smiling as in scorn,
106. Mutt'ring his wayward fancies he would rove,
107. Now drooping, woeful wan, like one forlorn,
108. Or craz'd with care, or cross'd in hopeless love.
Notes
(1) Wood, now smiling as in scorn: personification comparing the forest to a person. (2)
Wayward fancies: unpredictable, unexpected, or unwanted thoughts; capricious or
flighty thoughts. (3) Rove: wander. (4) Craz'd . . . cross'd: alliteration.
Stanza 28
109. "One morn I miss'd him on the custom'd hill,
110. Along the heath and near his fav'rite tree;
111. Another came; nor yet beside the rill,
Stanza 29
113. "The next with dirges due in sad array
114. Slow thro' the church-way path we saw him borne.
115. Approach and read (for thou canst read) the lay,
116. Grav'd on the stone beneath yon aged thorn."
Notes
(1) The next: the next morning. (2) Dirges: funeral songs. (3) Lay: short poem—in this
case, the epitaph below.
THE EPITAPH
117. Here rests his head upon the lap of Earth
118. A youth to Fortune and to Fame unknown.
119. Fair Science frown'd not on his humble birth,
120. And Melancholy mark'd him for her own.
121. Large was his bounty, and his soul sincere,
122. Heav'n did a recompense as largely send:
123. He gave to Mis'ry all he had, a tear,
124. He gain'd from Heav'n ('twas all he wish'd) a friend.
125. No farther seek his merits to disclose,
126. Or draw his frailties from their dread abode,
127. (There they alike in trembling hope repose)
128. The bosom of his Father and his God.
Note
General meaning: Here lies a man of humble birth who did not know fortune or fame but
who did become a scholar. Although he was depressed at times, he had a good life,
was sensitive to the needs of others, and followed God's laws. Don't try to find out more
about his good points or bad points, which are now with him in heaven.
..
Summary
The speaker is hanging out in a churchyard just after the sun goes down. It's dark and a
bit spooky. He looks at the dimly lit gravestones, but none of the grave markers are all
that impressive—most of the people buried here are poor folks from the village, so their
tombstones are just simple, roughly carved stones.
The speaker starts to imagine the kinds of lives these dead guys probably led. Then he
shakes his finger at the reader, and tells us not to get all snobby about the rough
monuments these dead guys have on their tombs, since, really, it doesn't matter what
kind of a tomb you have when you're dead, anyway. And guys, the speaker reminds us,
we're all going to die someday.
But that gets the speaker thinking about his own inevitable death, and he gets a little
freaked out. He imagines that someday in the future, some random guy (a "kindred
spirit") might pass through this same graveyard, just as he was doing today. And that
guy might see the speaker's tombstone, and ask a local villager about it. And then he
imagines what the villager might say about him. At the end, he imagines that the villager
points out the epitaph engraved on the tombstone, and invites the passerby to read it for
himself. So basically, Thomas Gray writes his own epitaph at the end of this poem
Themes
Death: the Great Equalizer
.......Even the proud and the mighty must one day lie beneath the earth, like the humble
men and women now buried in the churchyard, as line 36 notes: The paths of glory lead
but to the grave. Lines 41-44 further point out that no grandiose memorials and no
flattering words about the deceased can bring him or her back from death.
Can storied urn or animated bust
Back to its mansion call the fleeting breath?
Can Honour's voice provoke the silent dust,
Or Flatt'ry soothe the dull cold ear of Death?
Missed Opportunities
.......Because of poverty or other handicaps, many talented people never receive the
opportunities they deserve. The following lines elucidate this theme through metaphors:
Full many a gem of purest ray serene,
The dark unfathom'd caves of ocean bear:
Full many a flow'r is born to blush unseen,
And waste its sweetness on the desert air.
Here, the gem at the bottom of the ocean may represent an undiscovered musician,
poet, scientist or philosopher. The flower may likewise stand for a person of great and
noble qualities that are "wasted on the desert air." Of course, on another level, the gem
and the flower can stand for anything in life that goes unappreciated.
Virtue
.......In their rural setting, far from the temptations of the cities and the courts of kings,
the villagers led virtuous lives, as lines 73-76 point out:
Far from the madding crowd's ignoble strife,
Their sober wishes never learn'd to stray;
Along the cool sequester'd vale of life
They kept the noiseless tenor of their way.
Inversion
.......For poetic effect, Gray frequently uses inversion (reversal of the normal word
order). Following are examples:
Line 6: And all the air a solemn stillness holds (all the air holds a solemn stillness)
Line 14: Where heaves the turf in many a mould'ring heap (Where the turf heaves)
Line 24: Or climb his knees the envied kiss to share. (Or climb his knees to share the
envied kiss)
Line 79: With uncouth rhymes and shapeless sculpture deck'd (deck'd with uncouth
rhymes and shapeless sculpture)
Syncope
Omitting letters or sounds within a word.
Gray also frequently uses a commonplace poetic device known as syncope, the
omission of letters or sounds within a word.
The lowing herd wind slowly o'er the lea (line 2)
Now fades the glimm'ring landscape on the sight (line 5)
Save that from yonder ivy-mantled tow'r (line 9)
The swallow twitt'ring from the straw-built shed (line 18)
Figures of Speech
.......Following are examples of figures of speech in the poem.
Alliteration
Repetition of a Consonant Sound
The plowman homeward plods his weary way (line 3)
.
The cock's shrill clarion, or the echoing horn (line 19)
.
Nor cast one longing, ling'ring look behind? (line 88)
.
Now drooping, woeful wan, like one forlorn (line 107)
.
Or craz'd with care, or cross'd in hopeless love. (line 108)
Anaphora
Repetition of a word, phrase, or clause at the beginning of word groups occurring one
after the other
And all that beauty, all that wealth e'er gave (line 34)
Their name, their years, spelt by th' unletter'd muse (line 81)
Ev'n from the tomb the voice of Nature cries,
Ev'n in our ashes live their wonted fires. (lines 91-92)
Metaphor
Comparison between unlike things without using like, as, or than
Full many a gem of purest ray serene,
The dark unfathom'd caves of ocean bear:
Full many a flow'r is born to blush unseen,
And waste its sweetness on the desert air. (lines 53-56)
Comparison of the dead village people to gems and flowers
Or heap the shrine of Luxury and Pride
With incense kindled at the Muse's flame. (lines 71-72)
Comparison of flattering words to incense
Metonymy
Use of a word or phrase to suggest a related word or phrase
To scatter plenty o'er a smiling land
Land stands for people.
Personification
A form of metaphor that compares a thing to a person
Let not Ambition mock their useful toil
Their homely joys, and destiny obscure;
Nor Grandeur hear with a disdainful smile
The short and simple annals of the poor. (lines 29-32)
Ambition and Grandeur take on human characteristics.
But Knowledge to their eyes her ample page
Rich with the spoils of time did ne'er unroll (line 49-50)
Notice that Knowledge becomes a person, a female.
Fair Science frown'd not on his humble birth,
And Melancholy mark'd him for her own. (lines 119-120)
Science and Melancholy become persons.
Critical Appreciation
The Elegy is one of the greatest and finest of Gray's poems and marks a stage in the
development of his poetic genius. It reveals a growing democratic sentiment and
romantic mood of the poet. Instead of confining himself to the saloons, coffee houses or
the fashionable society of the town, Gray undertakes in this poem to deal with the life of
the rustic people of the village, to present the 'short and simple annals of the poor'. Wit
its lyricism, its treatment of nature, its melancholic mood and its emotional and
imaginative vigour, the Elegy reveals a romantic spirit and marks a shift from the
neoclassical poetry of the Augustan age, towards the Romantic poetry of the coming
age. It is essentially transitional in character and ushers in the era of romanticism.
Originality: Despite its treatment of common themes and sentiments, the poem is not
totally devoid of originality. Dr. Johnson acknowledges the originality of the four stanzas
beginning 'yet even these bones'. Gray's originality and individual talent may be seen in
his condensed expression of great ideas in highly quotable phrases like " Full many a
flower blush to die unseen" and "On some fond breast the parting soul relies". Herbert
W Starr points out " probably no other poem of the same length has contributed so
many famous phrases to our language." Gray's originality also lies in the fact that he
raised the voice of democratic sympathy much before the French or the American
revolution, aiming at the ideas of liberty, equality, and fraternity, had taken place. He
may be said to have inspired the democratic sentiments of Wordsworth who, much
later, wrote about poor rustics like Michael, the leech gatherer and the wagoner. Carl J
Webber remarks "Thomas Gray is the pioneer literary spokesman for the ordinary man,
the patron saint of the unknown soldier... . Gray's rude forefathers were also the
forefathers of Wordsworth's Wagoner, Michael and Peterbell."
Gray's originality also lies in his treatment of the non fulfillment of the desires of
common man and the non utilisation of his powers and talents because of lack of proper
opportunities. The poem may be called an elegy on the premature death of the talents
and energies of the poor. Another mark of Gray's originality is, that instead of
addressing it to the rich, great or privileged men, he addresses this poem about
common man to common men and seeks to elicit a sympathetic response for their
common lot. The adoption of the elegiac quatrain in place of the conventional heroic
couplet and the novel use of abstract personifications also reveal Gray's originality.
Humanity & Democratic Sentiments: The Elegy is remarkable for its humanity and its
concern for the lot of common human beings on this earth. It may be put alongwith
Keats's Ode to a Nightingale, which deals with the lot of man on this earth. Although it
hints at the inevitability of the end of all human glory and the futility of power, wealth,
ambition and pride, it is mainly concerned with the destiny of the common man and
seems to lament the loss and waste of so much talent and energy of the poor because
of lack of opportunity. A note of exultation may also be found in Gray's view that if
poverty proved hinderance in the way of the advancement of the common rustic people,
it also restrained them from doing evil and practising violence to gain material ends.
The democratic note may be found in the poem in the form of idea of equality and
helplessness of both the rich and the poor before death. Death is a great leveller. If it
deprives the poor of the opportunities ton rise, it also mercilessly snatches the power
and the glory of the rich. Both alike await the inevitable hour of death and both feel
helpless to do anything. The vanity of human wishes and aspirations has been nicely
pointed out in the poem. The distinction between the lives of the rich and the poor is
thus obliterated by death.
musings on human destiny in the later parts are also of melancholic nature. The
description of the rustic poet also gives a gloomy picture of his life. Thus, the whole
atmosphere and mood of the poem is tinged with melancholy. According to W V Moody
and R M Lovett the Elegy "is the finest flower of that literature of melancholy Which
Gray may be said to be haunted by a Hamlet like melancholy and sense of frustration.
The thirty two stanzas of the poem embody almost all the emotions and reflections that
a man commonly feels in the presence of death.
Unlike the neo classical poetry, the Elegy deals with the poet's personal feelings and
reflects his own mood like romantic poetry. In the original draft of the poem, consisting
of twenty two stanzas, quantity of personal references was less than what it is in the
expanded version.
Moral Tone: The Elegy is didactic in nature and seeks to convey certain morals about
human life. Gray exhorts the proud and ambitious people not to laugh at the simple life
and obscure destiny of the poor. He tells them that they are much like the poor that they
also have to die one day and leave all their glory, wealth and luxuries in this world. The
poem lays emphasis on the transitoriness of all human glory and the emptiness of all
boasts of power and wealth. It also points out the inevitability of death. Gray seems to
impress upon us the idea that being poor is not altogether a matter of misfortune. The
poor are fortunate in that they do not have to shut the gates of mercy on their fellow
beings as the great men have to do.
Technical Beauties: The Elegy is remarkable for its simplicity of expression, and Gray
says in it plainly what he has to say. There is nothing in the poem which can be called
extraordinary but there is what I A Richards terms "that triumph of an exquisitely
adjusted tone." The poet gives a perfect expression to his feelings and sentiments.
Several critics tend to criticise the Elegy on account of its common places and truisms.
These common places are good and have what Graham Hough believes to be 'their
compulsive force'. In them, Gray has generalised his personal views and reflections.
According to Hough "they are compelling because they are not only what they first
appear, majestic statements about the common lot: they are also the solution of Gray's
personal problem, and perhaps the only one possible in his day."
The Elegy possesses qualities like the stately measure of its verse, and the wonderful
felicity and perfection of its style. It contains the neoclassical qualities like allusiveness,
alliteration, personification and a dignified manner. The Elegy has not the delicate
shadowiness of 'Ode to Evening' and its monumental style and weight of thinking seem
beyond Collins. The verse of the Elegy is polished and musical and has a haunting
quality.
The reflections on life and death make the Elegy a philosophical poem but it is also a
sort of dramatic monologue in which the speaker has addressed imaginary readers or
listeners. The poem is a formalised composition and has a rhetorical condensed
expression. Historically speaking, the Elegy marks a shift from the neo classicism of the
18th century to the romanticism of the early 19th century. It foreshadows the romantic
poetry of Burns, Wordsworth, Shelley and others.
Despite its melancholic tone and its harping on the transitoriness of human glory, it
would be difficult to agree with Lyly Glazier's view about the Elegy that "the net effect of
the whole poem is negative and fatalistic." We may find the positive effect of the poem
in the fact that it does not glorify death. It lays emphasis on a desire for immortality
signified by the desire to be remembered or to perpetuate human by memorials.
It presents a faithful account of the human condition on this earth, and if that condition
turns out to be gloomy, Gray is not to be blamed for this. To him goes the credit for
pointing out not only the obscurity of life of the poor, but also their good luck in having
escaped, through death, the acts of cruelty and violence that they might have committed
had they lived longer.
The Elegy is certainly a great poem. Its universal appeal, its humanity and its broader
concern with the human condition are as much contributive to its greatness as its poetic
merits. Different factors may be said responsible for its greatness. To conclude it may
suffice to quote Douglas Bush who has nicely summed up its greatness, he remarks,
"one obvious reason is power of style which makes almost every line an example of
'what oft was thought but never so well expressed.' Images, though generalised, can be
nonetheless evocative. The antitheses are more than antitheses; they are a succession
of dynamic and ironic contrast between ways and views of life. And all this inward force
comes from a full sensibility working under precise control. In its combination of
personal attachment and involvement, as well as in its generalise texture, the Elegy is in
some sense an 18th century Lycidas."
2. What are the pictures of the simple homely joys and the useful toil of the
peasants the poem presents before us?
“Elegy written in a country churchyard” written by Thomas Gray is one of the most
famous poems in English literature. The poem is enriched with beautiful epigrammatic
phrases. “The paths of glory lead but to the grave”, “The curfew tolls the knell of parting
day” are a few of them. An Elegy is a poem lamenting the death of a person. Thomas
Gray laments the death of the poor, landless peasants of his hamlet Stoke Poges. They
are dead and buried in the church cemetery for ever awaiting the Judgement Day. So
the poet says that “the rude forefathers of the hamlet sleep”. The poet has used a
number of effective personifications which add to the beauty of the poem. Gray
introduces a suitable atmosphere which is very effective to the Elegy. The church bell
ringing the “curfew” is the death bell of the dying day. It is getting dark and the crescent
moon appears in the sky. The peace and silence of the churchyard is broken by the
droning flight of the beetle, the tinkling noise of the bell from the sheep’s neck and the
cry (hooting) of the owl from the disused ivy covered tower.
Now the poet tells us the story of the “rude forefathers of the hamlet sleep” in the
churchyard. Early in the morning they used to wake up by the sweet smelling breeze
and other noises such as the twittering of the swallow birds, the sound of the cocks and
the horn of the hunters in the surrounding jungle. They enjoyed their work. They cut
down trees and made farm. They went to farm with their cattle and ploughed the field,
sowed seeds and made very good harvest. They worked hard from dawn to dusk. In the
evening when they came back home with their cattle, their children welcomed them with
sweet kisses and their wives made very tasty food for them. Thus their life was full of
innocent, homely joys. They lived in peace and love. The Bible was everything for them.
If they said a lie, it was reflected on their faces and they were ashamed of it. They
strictly followed the teachings of the Bible and they died in peace.
Thomas Gray, the great English poet in his poem “Elegy Written in a Country
Churchyard” laments the death of the ‘rude forefathers of the hamlet’. These landless
peasants are as pure as the precious gems and gold ornaments hidden in the dark
caves of ocean. These peasants had great poetic, administrative and leadership
qualities but at the same time they were great moralists of the period. But utter poverty
prevented them from going to school to develop their inborn talents. This is why the
poet compares their lives to beautiful, sweet smelling flowers of the jungle where their
beauty and fragrance are wasted.
their work and innocent homely joys and kept away from the criminal activities of the city
people. The speaker also warns them that family reputation, show of political power and
the glories of beauty and wealth are short lived. All these human achievements are
buried with man in the churchyard.
Theme
Dylan Thomas’s "A Refusal to Mourn” was first published in “The New Republic” in
1945. It was published soon after the end of the Second World War. The poem is an
emphatic refusal to mourn the dead. Here, the dead being represented by the child. The
loss of a child is the greatest tragedy; and symbolic of life lost without having
blossomed. Thomas simply refuses to mourn for it would relegate the child itself to the
action of mourning. This refusal to mourn is rather a celebration of every innocent life
lost.
Appreciation
The poet's use of strong religious imagery reflects the connection of humanity to the
natural world, and the inevitable cycle of life and death. Essentially, no degree of
mourning or ritual can replace the life of the child. Further, the poem allows the reader
to interpret an individual perspective of the nature of death. Thomas offers the
possibility of a perpetual life after death, but also alludes to the notion of death as being
final. Thus, Thomas questions the validity of the mourning process, as it connects to the
natural cycle of life and death, from which humanity can not be rendered as superior or
segregated.
Within the first stanza, Thomas reveals his attitude that mankind is on the same level of
existence as 'Bird beast and flower.' In this, he indicates that humanity is at one with the
natural world, and that subsequently we are subjected to the same cycles of life and
death that apply to even the smallest of organisms. 'Making' and 'fathering' are used to
convey the sense that darkness is the generator or creator of life, although it is also
what prevails when life is taken away. Darkness is therefore a symbol of the creation of
life and death, and light becomes symbolic of the life that exists between the creation
and finality of death. It is in this stanza that Thomas reveals his paradoxical refusal to
allow elegy to console the feelings that loss of life provokes. As the poem opens with
'Never,' the reader acknowledges that Thomas rejects the idea of elegy, as no amount
of ritual and religious ceremony can ever do justice to the life that was lived.
However, Thomas presents the idea that death is a return to the natural world and
merely a completion of the life cycle. Thomas strongly alludes to the moment of
conception as he acknowledges that life ultimately stems from seed and water and
through death, it is this that he 'must enter again. In 'Zion of the water bead/ And the
synagogue of the ear of corn,' the poet reveals the sources from which life is born,
seeds and water. These elements are symbolically part of the renewal process. Just as
the Temple of Jerusalem ( in the Mount of Zion) was replaced by the synagogue, the
similar idea of change is reiterated here with the words ’Zion’, ’synagogue,’ etc. By
these symbols the poet also echoes the death of institutions and religions, to give way
to new ones.
By these symbols the poet also echoes the death of institutions and religions, to give
way to new ones. The image of ‘corn’ alludes to the parables. The phrase ‘ear of corn’
refers to the listening to these parables that preached these stories of inevitability. The
poet asks himself once again as to why he should pray for the shadow of a sound. The
memory of the person in question is only the shadow of a sound, remembrance of a
once-existing reality. The action of mourning is compared to the ‘sowing a salt seed’.
The hope of breeding something sterile or stagnant, for the death cannot come to life
with mourning.
The poet parodies the Valley of the Shadow of Death by the phrase ‘valley of sackcloth”
deteriorating the action of mourning as a ritual by itself that relegates the sacredness of
the funeral and dead one in question. Instead of the funeral shroud, the poet utilizes the
word ‘sackcloth’ to belittle the situation caused by the human ritualistic mourning of the
dead.
With generalizations over death, he will not tarnish the individuality and majesty of the
child. The ‘burning’ or the passionate emotions associated with death of the child were
too profound to be expressed. They were significant as compared to the mundane war.
Mankind did not represent her, rather she represented mankind. She proceeded with a
‘grave’ truth. The word ‘grave has two meanings here-that of being ‘serious’ and
‘pertaining to the grave’. He makes a reference to the ‘stations’ of the cross, the several
sufferings of Jesus Christ. He will not understate this ‘death’ with generalizations on the
transient nature of innocence and youth. The poet utilizes the statement “I shall not
murder”-a reminder of the Ten Commandments. It is indicative of how religion (also)
does not advocate the mourning of the child.
The poet addresses the dead as “London’s daughter”. This is further enforced by the
term” first dead”, as in ‘First Lady’. The long friends refer to the worms in the grave.
“One dies but once,” says Daiches , “and through that death becomes reunited with the
timeless unity of things”. The disintegrated body turns into particles of dust that are
ageless since they take part in the timeless cycle of nature. These particles get
ingrained in the veins of Mother Earth. The water of Thames is depicted as still and
‘unmourning’. The river that is otherwise kinetic (‘riding Thames’) is seen to be static.
After the first death, there is no other. Therefore, the action of mourning is useless, for
there is no further averting of the situation just because there is no death again.
Alternatively, the poet may be alluding to the sterility of life itself, in that death is
inevitable and thus life is continually approaching its end. It can also mean simply ‘to
cry’ as tears are salty.
g. The third verse exalts the girl’s death, and makes anything the poet
might say worthless. What words show the negative effect his words would
have?
Murder, a grave truth, blaspheme.
h. What double meanings are there in ‘a grave truth’ (1.15) and
‘stations’ (1.16)?
Grave- means tomb or serious
Stations- stations of the cross, stopping points of breath/sobs
i. Who do you think ‘the first dead’ (1.19) are, and whose ‘the first death’
(1..24) is?
The people who have died first in the dreadful war. The poet means that all deaths are
equal. He feels that there is no meaning in mourning the death of these people as it
would be to mourn the death of those countless people who died centuries ago.
j. Who or what are ‘the long friends’ (1.20)?
‘The long friends’ refer to the worms in the grave. But the implication also covers the
memories of friends, the long friendship and community- the oneness of mankind.
k. Apart from the poet, who or what does not mourn?
The River Thames.
l. The third verse seems to imply that the poet is not indifferent to the child’s
death. Do you agree?
He is awed by death. The poet assures his readers that death is an uncompromising
fact in life. However the poem justifies his refusal to mourn.
m. When will the poet mourn? Why not till then?
Not until the end of time or of the world. It is because death has to be accepted as an
inevitable fact in this world.
· Vocabulary
Humbling darkness- darkness (suggesting death) having a humble and meek
appearance
Tumbling- To perform acrobatic feats such as somersaults, rolls, or twists.
Harness- To bring under control and direct the force of (verb), the combination of
straps, bands and other parts forming the working gear of a draft animal (noun).
Zion- A term that most often refers to Jerusalem and, by extension, the Biblical land of
Israel. The term Zion came to designate the area of Jerusalem where the fortress stood,
and later became a metonym for Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem (Temple in Jerusalem
or Holy Temple refers to one of a series of structures located on the Temple Mount in
the Old City of Jerusalem.)
Synagogue- A building or place of meeting for worship and religious instruction in the
Jewish faith.
Sackcloth- Garments made of camel's hair, goat hair, hemp, cotton, or flax, worn as a
symbol of mourning or penitence.
Dylan Thomas attached great importance to the use of imagery, and an understanding of his
imagery is essential for an understanding of his poetry. Thomas' vivid imagery involved word play,
fractured syntax, and personal symbolism. Thomas’ poetic imagery shows the use of a mixture of
several techniques, the most prominent being the surrealistic, imagistic, and metaphysical. But
the bible, his study of Shakespeare and other English poets also laid under contribution. Thomas as
a resourceful "language-changer", like Shakespeare, Dickens, Hopkins and Joyce, shaped the
English language into a richly original mélange of rhythm, imagery and literary allusion. Here follows
a brief discussion on Dylan Thomas’ poetic imagery along with a critical inquiry into the major woks
by this poet:
Nature Imagery
Dylan Thomas is especially renowned for his celebration of natural beauty. Some of his poems
contain vivid and refreshing pictures of nature, even though he does not have any philosophy of
nature to offer. The influence of the Romantic poets is seen in his recurrent vision of a pristine
beauty in nature. Indeed, Thomas was a nature poet in the sense that much of his truest inspiration
arose from a natural scene which he had observed long and lovingly. This is particularly seen
in Poem in October. In this poem Thomas illustrates nature wonderfully alive with ordinary sights and
sounds. In his thirtieth birthday when he comes out of the town, he finds the whole nature is greeting
him. Thomas sees himself on his way to heaven or in the sight of heaven. The whole scene seems
holy to him. He feels a complete harmony with nature. The wood seems to him to be his neighbor,
the herons to be priests and the waves of the ocean rise high as if in honour and worship of their
creator. The birds are calling and the gardens are blooming. In short, the poem encapsulates one of
the most remarkable accounts of wonderful vivid nature pictures with a general atmosphere of joy.
Imagery of death
Death is a frequent theme in Dylan Thomas’ poetry, especially in the corpus of his mature work.
Thomas employs different interesting and unorthodox images to present various aspects of death. In
the poem Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night, for example, he emphasizes resistance towards
death as he repeats this appeal in the last line in every stanza. Imagery is used by Thomas to create
the theme of his poem and what it means. Although readers are unaware of the details behind the
on coming death of Thomas’ father, the motives of the author for writing this poem are very obvious.
In this Thomas is asking his father through pleading words to fight against the darkness that is taking
over and leading him into the afterlife.
Initially, Thomas uses images of fury and fighting in the lines "do not go gentle", "good night" and
"dying of the light" to emphasize the resistance towards death. With these images, Thomas conveys
death as the end and where darkness prevails. He takes his stand within concrete, particular
existence. He places birth and death at the poles of his vision. Excessive images of anger and rage
towards death exemplify the passion Thomas feels for life.
Secondly, Thomas brings into action images of "burn" and "rave at close of day" to show and
emphasize the resistance towards death. Contrasting images of light and darkness in the poem
create warmth of living and the coldness of death, so as to discourage people from choosing the
dreary, bitter coldness of death:
In addition, Thomas uses images of " wise men" and " grave men [who] have not used their blinding
sight" to tell his dying father that all men either smart or ignorant need to fight against death. A man
peacefully may prepare to die only when he has made his true contribution to society. Here Thomas
shares an attitude towards death, which is very much similar to Robert Frost’s Stopping by Woods
on a snowy Evening:
Sexual Imagery
Sexual imagery is recurrent in Thomas’ poetry. He uses sexual imagery almost everywhere. The
influence of the seventeenth-century metaphysical poets is often cited in connection with Thomas'
unconventional religious imagery. Thomas speaks with directness and passion on the theme of sex
quite similar to Donne. Thomas’ work shows the same fusing of sexual and religious imagery as it is
seen in Donne’s poetry. In both poets there is an intense consciousness of death. Donne preached a
sermon in his grave-clothes and Thomas’ poems show a similar fixation with the physical fact of
death:
The force that through the green fuse drives the flower
Drives my green age; that blasts the roots of trees
Is my destroyer.
In his best works he captures psychological moods which have been rarely captured, especially
those of childhood and adolescence. He himself matured early, and his early poetry is the poetry of
an adolescent. In The Hunchback in the Park Thomas talks about a solitary hunchback who eats
bread from a newspaper, drinks water from the chained cup of the fountain, and sleeps at night in a
dog-kennel. These details about him show that he is a homeless outcast, not a normal member of
society. He is doubly an outcast, because of his deformity and vagrancy, and therefore an object of
mockery to the truant boys playing in the park.
Religious Imagery
Dylan Thomas’ interests were psychological but they were also religious. Indeed, God and Christ are
rarely absent from his poems since he takes imagery largely from the Bible. For example, in the
poem After the Funeral we see religious imagery when the poet regards the woods as a kind of
chapel where a religious ceremony would be held in honour of his deceased Aunt. He visualises four
birds who will fly over her, making the sign of the cross in order to bless her spirit. Again, in the
poem A Refusal to Mourn the Death, by Fire, of a Child in London we have religious imagery like:
“Zion of the water bead” and “the synagogue of the ear of corn”. The words “Zion” and “synagogue”
provide a sacramental quality to enhance its religious appeal.
Text
Summary
The speaker notices a knight wandering alone on the road, and asks himself what
troubles the knight could possibly have encountered. He appears in a poor physical and
emotional state, his skin a deathly pallor. The speaker asks the knight about his
troubles. He tells a story about a mysterious woman he met on the hillside. Her wild
eyes quickly captivated the knight and, before long, they made love and rode away on
the speaker's horse. However, the "faery-like" lady had a few tricks up her sleeve. In her
home, a small cave on the hillside, the woman lulled him to sleep. In the knight's dream,
he meets kings, princes, and warriors who were also seduced by the woman, only to be
left eternally pale and loitering in the woods. He woke up alone, abandoned by the
woman, lost like the others.
Characters
The speaker
A man who notices a fellow knight wandering through a chilly hillside one evening.
The knight
The "haggard" knight who appears to the speaker on a hillside, and relates to the speaker his
encounter with a beautiful woman on the same hillside.
The characters the knight meets during his dream on the hillside who, like him, fell beneath the
woman's charms.
Themes
The supernatural
"La Belle Dame Sans Merci" deals with supernatural elements. The woman that the knight falls
in love with is described as a "faery's child." A faery is a mythical, supernatural being, thus, by
describing the woman as a faery's child, Keats brings out the theme of supernatural beings in
this poem. Moreover, when the knight describes the time he spent with the woman, he states
that she gave him wild food, thereby bringing out the eeriness of this woman.
In the end, the knight finds himself on a cold hillside along with other men who were rapt in the
same woman's spell. When they saw the knight, they exclaimed that "La Belle Dame sans Merci
/ Thee hath in thrall!’. Through the setting and the description of the woman, Keats brings out
the supernatural element in this poem.
Does the knight, weak and weary in the forest, give in so quickly to the woman because of her
supernatural charm, or because he longs for a love that falls outside of the strict, courtly
restraints? While the poem explores the pleasures of sexual liberation, it ends cautiously. His
love for the woman is briefly requited, but the satisfaction is short-lived: she leaves him the way
she found him, "alone and palely loitering" among the hillside.
man to be ensnared by this woman. The dialogue spoken by the pale lovers—"La belle dame
sans merci, / Thee hath in thrall"—further highlights the theme of the femme fatale.
Summary
In the first three stanzas, the speaker notices a knight wandering among a pastoral landscape
near nighttime. The knight is visibly wearied and fatigued, and the speaker wonders what could
possibly befall him. It's late Autumn or early winter, and the birds are silent. While we don't know
yet what happened to the knight, the speaker sets up the reader for the knight's story,
establishing the poem's dreary tone and atmosphere.
Analysis
The speaker directly addresses the knight he meets in the hillside, calling attention to the
knight's vulnerability. The knight is "alone and palely loitering," his physical state mirrored by the
landscape, which is a common feature of Romantic poetry. The grasses have withered, and the
birds have grown silent. The harvest season is over, and the natural world prepares its transition
into winter. The lily on the knight's brow suggests purity, innocence, and virtue: in spite of his
haggard and woeful state, he retains the sense of honor and duty expected of a man of his
stature. But the lily also symbolizes death, and as the speaker notices, the knight's face looks
anguished and feverish, and the color is quickly draining from his cheeks.
Although the first three stanzas are relatively short, we can learn a remarkable amount about
the knight, the speaker, and the poem’s conflict through the language and detail. First, we know
that the knight is traveling alone and, based on his physical state, he’s been on the road for
quite some time. Next, we know that it’s the end of autumn or early winter, because harvest time
has ended and the grass has begun to wither and die. Finally, the symbolic juxtaposition of the
lily and rose foregrounds a tension between purity and eros. The troubles the knight
encountered on the road were likely erotic in nature.
From the repetition of “O what can ail thee, knight-at-arms,” we can deduce that danger lurks in
the woods, and that the knight isn't exactly in the best shape to face any more impending
challenges. By opening the poem with the question, the speaker begins a conversation that will
last throughout the duration of the poem, and the majority of the poem is the knight's answer.
What will the knight tell him when he begins to speak?
Summary
In stanza four, the knight begins to recount his experience on the hillside. He describes the
beautiful woman he met in the meadows, and the way he quickly fell for her charms. After
making love, the couple ride away on the speaker's horse, and the woman sings to him a
'faery's song'. They stop briefly, and she feeds him honey and manna, claiming she loves him in
her own, strange tongue. When they reach her hiding place—an "Elfin grot"—the woman starts
to weep, and the knight kisses her eyelids. Then, the knight falls into a deep sleep, dreaming
wildly on the cold hillside.
Analysis
We learn that the knight was enchanted by the woman, and that his experience with her caused
his poor state. He compares her to “a faery’s child,” suggesting that she possessed a
supernatural charm. Her “wild” eyes indicate her sexual appeal and desire. The garland and
bracelets that he makes for the woman indicate his own desire, while the woman’s looks and
moans let us know that their brief relationship was, indeed, erotic. However, the woman's
supernatural characteristics suggest that, for the knight, the love he found may be too good to
be true.
In stanzas four and five, the knight appears to occupy a position of power in the relationship, in
spite of the woman’s charms. He gives her gifts and sets her on his horse, and the couple rides
away. However, in stanza six, the situation reverses: the woman feeds him honey and manna,
expressing her love, and then brings him to her home. When the knight kisses her eyelids, the
woman lulls him to sleep, bringing woeful, foreboding nightmares. The knight's act of love
becomes the cause of his pain, in spite of the affair's pleasure.
The first half of the knight's story creates a complex picture of the woman: she is a femme fatale
with a supernatural ability to seduce the men who cross her path. Her "faery-like"
characteristics, as well as the knights, kings, and princes who populate the poem, look back to a
medieval poetic tradition. Keats draws upon these references and modernizes them through his
explicit juxtaposition of sexual liberation and the courtly tradition. What will happen in his dream,
and what will the horrific sights he sees tell him about the woman's true nature?
the men in his dream, the knight is doomed to wander pale and alone among the hillside, on
a journey that never ends.
Analysis
The climax of the poem occurs during the knight's terrifying nightmares in stanza 10. We
learn that all of the men ensnared by the lady are of regal stature. This detail is crucial
because it alerts us to the tensions between the woman's sexual liberation and the
chivalrous, courtly tradition of the kings, princes, and warriors she seduces. Bound to a
code of honor, these men would probably think twice before sleeping with a woman they
met in the woods. However, their exhaustion, loneliness, and desire, combined with the
woman's charm and forward nature, created the perfect storm for spontaneous, immediate,
erotic satisfaction.
At first, the joy and pleasure these men experience testify to the value of a less straight-
laced attitude to erotic love. But, as we know from the dream, falling for the lady proved
disastrous: they woke up cold and alone, wandering forever in the woods, searching for a
love that will never be found again. But the poem isn't simply condemning this kind of love;
rather, it expresses a contradictory longing for both the courtly tradition's security and the
intense passion of eroticism. For the knight, the woman's earlier emphasis on her "true"
love for him certainly connected to an idea of stability and faithfulness; however, the
association of sex with the woman's "faery-like," bewitching charms suggests the danger of
erotic desire, and the uncertainty of these affairs.
Considering the poem's context in Keats' life—as well as the personal nature of much of his
poetry—it's possible that the poet's allegorically-inflected knight's tale speaks to the
frustrations and fears of his own relationship. Although Keats' love for Fanny Brawne was
reciprocated, the couple faced difficult obstacles—first, Brawne's family was of a higher
social class, and second, Keats' health was failing. Keats' proposals to Fanny Brawne were
initially rejected because of his financial situation; Brawne and her family accepted when it
became clear Keats was dying of tuberculosis, knowing well his winter in Italy would be his
last. While scholars believe that Brawne and Keats never consummated their love, the
powerful emotions expressed in their letters read much like the speaker's passion for the
lady.
Giving in to sexual desire could mean losing love and experiencing profound emotional
pain—but resisting this desire can be just as painful, and just as preoccupying as love's loss.
Is it better to wander cold and alone, stuck somewhere in a dream-space where time
appears to stop, with only the memory of this love? Or should one turn away from love and
hold fast to tradition, regardless of how strong one's desire may be and how lonely one
may feel? Even though the knight was bewitched by the woman, the pleasure and joy he felt
during their brief, erotic relationship was real. The woman is no longer physically present
at the end of the poem, but she still holds countless men "in thrall," or captive beneath her
power.
When the knight ends his story, the speaker from the first stanza has yet to meet the lady in
the meadows. What choice will he make when they eventually cross paths? Will he make it
through the woods with his heart intact? Or will he be like the other men lost in the woods,
alone and bloodless, only capable of reliving his story as a warning?
Questions
1. Why does the narrator find the condition of the knight so strange that he has to
ask him that he has to ask him what ails him?
The knight looks pale like winter. He seems to have no purpose. His paleness has
something to with what is ailing him. Paleness is associated to death. So death and his heart
break seem to have engulfed his whole being and thus reflect on his face. The colour of his
face had gone from rode red to lily white signifying complete thrall. This paleness startles
the narrator since there seems no evidence of any war or attack about the calm place
where the narrator found the knight. He thus presumes that there could be something else
that could have made the knight death pale.
2. Describe how the knight fell in love with the beautiful lady and declared his love
and passion for her.
The knight instantly fell in love with the lady. Her delicate fairy like stature, her long hair,
light feet, wild eyes in short her beautiful looks sweeps him off his feet the very moment he
saw her. He makes flower garlands for her hair and bracelets too for her picked freshly
from nature. Both look at each other with a lot of love. He takes her on his teed and ride on
it the whole day. He heard her beautiful singing that sounded like a fairy’s song. He relished
her words when she said she loved him. At the elfin grot he kisses her eyes that sobbed
heavily and he fell asleep as she lulled him asleep.
The beautiful lady wept her heart out. It is unknowingly why she cried. The reason for her
taking him to her ‘elfin grot’ is also vastly criticized. She probably casts her magic spell on
the knight. Her crying induces the knight to calm her with kisses on those beautiful eyes
that shed copious tears. Two kisses on each eye pacify her. She puts him to sleep gently. She
had already cast her spell on beauty on him. That made him love her with all his heart. Now
she further casts her spell on him to end the dreamy love sequence by putting him to sleep.
It is probably not sane to continue the love story. Everything mortal has to come to an end
and every immortal dream should wake to reality. This is what it probably means to lull
him to sleep to wake up to reality. The whole love affair ought to be a dream. But he
actually dreamt of kings, princes and warriors who gathered about him shouting that the
beautiful lady had deserted him, throwing him into much danger and misery. They all
looked pale like death as they shrieked his misfortune. While the whole love affair had been
in summer, this dream seems to be in winter since their lips were ‘pale’ and ‘starved’ either
to personify the thrall the knight is in or depicting the wretchedness of the season which
has emanated from summer. This could possibly connote the doom of the knight.
The lines ‘o what can ail thee,/ knight at arms’ has been repeated twice to signify the
immense paleness the face of the knight bears. His face seems to be fully thrall struck and
its lack of colour startles the narrator. The line is also repeated to make the ballad effective:
to make it sound appealing while sung. It is rhythmic to suit its purpose. The lines ‘alone
and loitering?/ The sedge has withered from the lake,/ and no birds sing’ have been
repeated twice once in the beginning of the poem and once at the end. The lines in the first
stanza denote the end of the dream that has led the knight deep into winter which could
mean that his paleness/ his misery has increased. His battered soul ceases to comprehend
the pain it has to go through. The lady has deserted him for reason unknown. The lines
repeated in the final stanza denote how he became pale and how the season has affected
him indirectly. The reason for his paleness that has just slipped from summer beauty into
wintery paleness. It connotes the starvation and desperation of his heart just like the
gruesome winter. Its repetition is to also satisfy the balladic feature of lyrical rhythm. The
word ‘dream’ is repeated twice which makes readers wonder if the knight wants to insist
that the vision he saw was infact a dream and not a real event. The harsh repetition of the
‘th’ sound in the line ‘hath thee in thrall’ has possibly been used to wake the knight up from
his dreamy sleep. In the next stanza he sees their mouth open, as if in yawning, after having
‘cried’ their warnig and then he wakes up.
Keats sets his simple story of love and death in a bleak wintry landscape that is appropriate
to it: "The sedge has wither'd from the lake / And no birds sing!" The repetition of these
two lines, with minor variations, as the concluding lines of the poem emphasizes the fate of
the unfortunate knight and neatly encloses the poem in a frame by bringing it back to its
beginning.
In keeping with the ballad tradition, Keats does not identify his questioner, or the knight, or
the destructively beautiful lady. What Keats does not include in his poem contributes as
much to it in arousing the reader's imagination as what he puts into it. La belle dame sans
merci, the beautiful lady without pity, is a femme fatale, a Circe like figure who attracts
lovers only to destroy them by her supernatural powers. She destroys because it is her
nature to destroy. Keats could have found patterns for his "faery's child" in folk mythology,
classical literature, Renaissance poetry, or the medieval ballad. With a few skillful touches,
he creates a woman who is at once beautiful, erotically attractive, fascinating, and deadly.
Some readers see the poem as Keats' personal rebellion against the pains of love. In his
letters and in some of his poems, he reveals that he did experience the pains, as well as the
pleasures, of love and that he resented the pains, particularly the loss of freedom that came
with falling in love. However, the ballad is a very objective form, and it may be best to read
"La Belle Dame sans Merci" as pure story and no more. How Keats felt about his love for
Fanny Brawne we can discover in the several poems he addressed to her, as well as in his
letters.
6. Bring out the romantic, medieval and supernatural elements in the poem.
"La Belle Dame sans Merci" is a ballad, a medieval genre revived by the romantic poets.
Keats uses the so-called ballad stanza, a quatrain in alternating iambic tetrameter and
trimeter lines. The shortening of the fourth line in each stanza of Keats' poem makes the
stanza seem a self-contained unit, gives the ballad a deliberate and slow movement, and is
pleasing to the ear. Keats uses a number of the stylistic characteristics of the ballad, such as
simplicity of language, repetition, and absence of details; like some of the old ballads, it
deals with the supernatural. Keats' economical manner of telling a story in "La Belle Dame
sans Merci" is the direct opposite of his lavish manner in The Eve of St. Agnes. Part of the
fascination exerted by the poem comes from Keats' use of understatement.
Keats sets his simple story of love and death in a bleak wintry landscape that is appropriate
to it: "The sedge has wither'd from the lake / And no birds sing!" The repetition of these
two lines, with minor variations, as the concluding lines of the poem emphasizes the fate of
the unfortunate knight and neatly encloses the poem in a frame by bringing it back to its
beginning.
In keeping with the ballad tradition, Keats does not identify his questioner, or the knight, or
the destructively beautiful lady. What Keats does not include in his poem contributes as
much to it in arousing the reader's imagination as what he puts into it. La belle dame sans
merci, the beautiful lady without pity, is a femme fatale, a Circe like figure who attracts
lovers only to destroy them by her supernatural powers. She destroys because it is her
nature to destroy. Keats could have found patterns for his "faery's child" in folk mythology,
classical literature, Renaissance poetry, or the medieval ballad. With a few skillful touches,
he creates a woman who is at once beautiful, erotically attractive, fascinating, and deadly.
Some readers see the poem as Keats' personal rebellion against the pains of love. In his
letters and in some of his poems, he reveals that he did experience the pains, as well as the
pleasures, of love and that he resented the pains, particularly the loss of freedom that came
with falling in love. However, the ballad is a very objective form, and it may be best to read
"La Belle Dame sans Merci" as pure story and no more. How Keats felt about his love for
Fanny Brawne we can discover in the several poems he addressed to her, as well as in his
letters.
The poem has a rhyme scheme of ABAB in each stanza. The last words of the first and
third line and the last words of the second and fourth line of each stanza rhyme with
each other. The rhythm of the poem makes it adapt a ballad form.
Foreshadowing:
The speaker of the poem presents foreshadowing of what the soldiers are about to do
starting from the second stanza itself though he does not realize it himself until the last
second stanza.
Repetition:
The last word of the second line of each stanza is repeated twice. This repetition gives it
a song like quality while keeping the severity of the content unreal. There is also the
repetition of the word ‘O’ at the beginning of each stanza and the word ‘dear’ as the last
word of the third line of all but the final stanza.
Allusion:
It is not explicitly said that the speaker of the poem and the one who answers his/her
questions are married. It is inferred in the last second stanza when the speaker speaks
of vows. There is no allusion to whether the speaker is the husband or the wife.
The speaker next asks what the light that keeps flashing was. It is the glint of their
weapons dear, says the spouse.
Similarly the speaker continues to question the actions of the soldiers and the spouse
gives appropriate answers. The soldiers all the while keep marching towards the
speaker’s house. The speaker thinks that they would stop somewhere before, but no;
they pass the doctor’s house and the parson’s church and the cunning farmer’s barn,
straight towards his house.
The spouse says he/she was leaving the speaker now. The speaker, afraid asks
him/her if the vows he/she took were all false. The spouse replies that they were all true
but still, he/she must leave.
And then the soldiers break the door, and come into the house with burning eyes.
The light glinting off their weapons shows that the soldiers most probably had a purpose
on their march. It is said they step lightly which is to indicate that they increased their
pace of the march. The foreshadowing in the poem makes its presence acute from here
on. The spouse says that they were either training or doing the march as a warning.
This indicates that that spouse had a faint idea as to the purpose of the soldiers. This
also cements the possibility of hostility.
The soldiers suddenly turn off course and this makes the speaker of the poem kneel
down. It is unclear whether he was doing so in prayer or in order to hide, but we get the
idea that there is a possibility that the soldiers were there for the speaker. The speaker
realizes that at this point but he does not take any action and only keeps on hoping that
the soldiers weren’t there for him, that they would stop somewhere else.
The soldiers do not stop at the doctor’s house which eliminates the possibility that the
‘scarlet’ in stanza 1 meant bloody. The soldiers do not stop at the parson’s house either.
There is an increasing urgency in the voice of the speaker. This indicates his hope
against hope that the soldiers were there were some other person. This idea is
cemented when he describes the farmer as cunning. The speaker was so desperate
that he started wildly accusing and guessing other possibilities. The soldiers start
running after passing the farmer’s house.
At this point, the spouse realizes that the soldiers were here for his/her significant half.
But that does not stop him/her from leaving in this moment of crisis. This is shown in the
penultimate stanza where the speaker pleads the spouse to stay, holding him/her to the
vows they exchanged during their wedding. But this does not sway the spouse. He/she
says that he/she still loves the speaker but he/she must be leaving. This betrayal of the
partner is shown simply and without much ado, which makes it that much more brutal.
The narrative which was in a conversational style till now turns to a single voice in the
last stanza. The soldiers break the door and come for the speaker and the poem ends
here, leaving the reader speculating as to what happens next. It might be guessed that
whatever it was wasn’t anything pleasant to the speaker seeing his previous frightened
state and the burning eyes the soldiers bore.
The speaker of the poem avoids the truth for as long as possible. He/she has an idea of
his/her deeds (which is not mentioned in the poem), and that someday they would catch
up to him/her (seeing the way he/she knelt upon seeing the soldiers change course
towards his/her home), but he/she still remains inactive in light of the faintest chance
that it wasn’t for him/her that the soldiers were coming for. This avoidance of the truth
ended up in him/her being betrayed by his/her spouse; whereas if acted upon earlier
they could both have a chance of escaping together.
Summary
A first-person persona addresses the west wind in five stanzas. It is strong and
fearsome. In the first stanza, the wind blows the leaves of autumn. In the second
stanza, the wind blows the clouds in the sky. In the third stanza, the wind blows across
an island and the waves of the sea. In the fourth stanza, the persona imagines being
the leaf, cloud, or wave, sharing in the wind’s strength. He desires to be lifted up rather
than caught low on “the thorns of life,” for he sees himself as like the wind: “tameless,
and swift, and proud.” In the final stanza, he asks the wind to play upon him like a lyre;
he wants to share the wind’s fierce spirit. In turn, he would have the power to spread his
verse throughout the world, reawakening it.
Analysis
The poet is directing his speech to the wind and all that it has the power to do as it takes
charge of the rest of nature and blows across the earth and through the seasons, able
both to preserve and to destroy all in its path. The wind takes control over clouds, seas,
weather, and more. The poet offers that the wind over the Mediterranean Sea was an
inspiration for the poem. Recognizing its power, the wind becomes a metaphor for
nature’s awe-inspiring spirit. By the final stanza, the speaker has come to terms with the
wind’s power over him, and he requests inspiration and subjectivity. He looks to nature’s
power to assist him in his work of poetry and prays that the wind will deliver his words
across the land and through time as it does with all other objects in nature.
The form of the poem is consistent in pattern. Each stanza is fourteen lines in length,
using the rhyming pattern of aba bcb cdc ded ee. This is called terza rima, the form
used by Dante in his Divine Comedy.
Keeping in mind that this is an ode, a choral celebration, the tone of the speaker
understandably includes excitement, pleasure, joy, and hope. Shelley draws a parallel
between the seasonal cycles of the wind and that of his ever-changing spirit. Here,
nature, in the form of the wind, is presented, according to Abrams “as the outer
correspondent to an inner change from apathy to spiritual vitality, and from imaginative
sterility to a burst of creative power.”
Thematically, then, this poem is about the inspiration Shelley draws from nature. The
“breath of autumn being” is Shelley’s atheistic version of the Christian Holy Spirit.
Instead of relying on traditional religion, Shelley focuses his praise around the wind’s
role in the various cycles in nature—death, regeneration, “preservation,” and
“destruction.” The speaker begins by praising the wind, using anthropomorphic
techniques (wintry bed, chariots, corpses, and clarions) to personalize the great natural
spirit in hopes that it will somehow heed his plea. The speaker is aware of his own
mortality and the immortality of his subject. This drives him to beg that he too can be
inspired (“make me thy lyre”) and carried (“be through my lips to unawakened earth”)
through land and time.
The first two stanzas are mere praise for the wind’s power, covered in simile and
allusion to all that which the wind has the power to do: “loosen,” “spread,” “shed,” and
“burst.” In the fourth and fifth stanzas, the speaker enters into the poem, seeking
(hoping) for equal treatment along with all other objects in nature, at least on the
productive side. The poet offers humility in the hope that the wind will assist him in
achieving his quest to “drive [his] dead thoughts over the universe.” Ultimately, the poet
is thankful for the inspiration he is able to draw from nature’s spirit, and he hopes that it
will also be the same spirit that carries his words across the land where he also can be
a source of inspiration.
“Ode to the West Wind” is one of the most famous poems by Shelley and it was
published in the same book, which consists of his famous drama, Prometheus Unbound
and many magnificent lyric poems. He wrote this poem in the autumn of 1819 in Florence.
The poem is considered as one of the noblest lyrics in English. It bears testimony to the
poetic genius that Shelley was.
Structurally the poem is divided into five stanzas or cantos. Each stanza is in sonnet form.
The ode consists of five sonnets. Every sonnet consists of four terza rima with traditional
terza rima rhymes and a rhymed couplet. The first three stanzas are the address of the
wind and at the same time the characterization description of the wind. All of three stanzas
end with the “O hear” prayer. In the fourth stanza, personal elements penetrate in the
poem and Shelley compares himself with the wind. He makes fervent plea to the wind to
lift him up as he bleeds falling on the ‘thorns of life’. The last stanza is a prayer to the
forceful spirit of the wind to use him for regeneration of humanity. Shelley ends on a note
of optimism
“O, Wind,
If winter comes, can spring be far behind”
In the poem, the West Wind is presented as a powerful force. Shelley makes myths of the
autumnal West Wind as a great force which possesses redeeming power. It is gigantic,
wild, restless power, free and unbounded. Two contrasting aspects of the wind are under
lined in the first three stanzas- its terrifying destructive power and its gentle fostering
influence. It is simultaneously a destroyer and a preserver. On the earth, the wind drives
away dry leaves of trees like “ghosts from an enchanter fleeing”. It also carries the winged
seeds and deposits them in the ‘dark wintry bed’, where they remain buried throughout
the winter. The same wind will also make them germinate in the spring. It also sweeps
wild storm clouds along on the firmament from the bottom of the sky to the peak of the
sky. The wind also makes its mighty influence felt on the sea. It stirs the Mediterranean
Sea to its depth. It makes a lashing progress through the waters of the Atlantic, dividing
the mighty Atlantic’s ‘level powers’ into two halves, its impact reaching miles below to turn
the submarine nature grey in fear. Thus, the mythical might of the wind cover the earth,
the sky and the seas.
“Ode to the West Wind” is a lyric. The music swells like the surge of the west wind. Shelley
uses a number of poetic devices in order to bring his ideas home. The dramatic alliteration
in the opening line, “Wild West Wind”, announces energy and force. The wind is
personified and has been given a mythical stature. The poem is replete with images and
metaphors. There is a rapid succession of images in the poem. The poet’s emotion is at
the peak when he makes fervent appeal to the wind to make him its ‘lyre’. His use of
emotive language is noteworthy.
The poem starts with the natural and the moves to the personal finally turning to the
universal. Shelley deftly blends the natural, the personal and the universal in the same
poem. It also captures the past, the present and the future. Shelley finished this great
poem optimistically believing in the rise of humanity.
reader. Commonly acclaimed as one of the supreme lyrical geniuses in English poetry,
Shelley’s poetry is always pleasant reading because of the lyrical qualities it embodies.
Shelley is an intense lyricist. He stands alone among singers and he is the perfect
singing bird. His poems reveal intense lyricism. His lyrical temper finds expression in
flashes of imagination, emotional exuberance, lilting melody, splendor of imagery and
subjective note. His “Ode to the West Wind” and “To a Skylark” are two of his most
outstanding lyrics. They exhibit Shelley’s genius as a lyric poet.
Spontaneity is one of the most striking features of Shelley’s lyrics. His lyrics are pure
effusions and they come directly from his heart. In “To a Skylark” he sings as naturally as
the bird. The poet’s spontaneous expression is notable in the following lines:
Emotional exuberance is another lyrical quality. There is a great intensity of feeling ins
Shelley’s lyrics. There is also a note of desire and longing in most of his lyrics. He is
always yearning for what is unattainable. In “Ode to the West Wind” Shelley gives vent to
his intense desire to the united with the force of the wind. He expresses his ardent desire
to accompany him in his mission of creating a new order of life but the agonies and
bitterness of life- “heavy weight of hours” have repressed his qualities. He makes an
ardent appeal to the wind to lift him like ‘a wave, a leaf, a cloud’. In the last section, he
vehemently urges the west wind to infuse its vigour and power into him, so that he can
play the “trumpet of prophecy” and render his massage to mankind. In “To a Skylark”, we
observe the poet’s emotional outpouring in the lines expressing human sadness:
Musical quality is an integral part of all lyrics. Shelley’s lyrics are surprisingly musical
and sweet. He has the gift of lending to his lyrics the sweetest and most liquid harmonies.
“To a Skylark” and “Ode to the West Wind” are both musical triumphs. In addition to the
melodic effects, Shelley’s lyrics are highly embellished compositions replete with
ornamental imagery. “To a Skylark” presents many glittering pictures. One such image
is found in the following lines:
Shelley’s genius was essentially lyrical. He is one of the r musical poets in English
literature. His poems embody all the qualities of lyric poems.
constant aim in poetry was to bring about a glorious millennium- a Golden Age in future.
His “Ode to the West Wind” is a poetic manifestation of the home and optimism that he
would nourish in the inner recesses of his heart.
In the poem “Ode to the West Wind”, Shelley presents the wind as a mighty, powerful
force. The duality of the wind’s power is emphasized throughout the poem. Two
contrasting aspects of the wind are underlined in the first three stanzas- its terrifying
destructive power and its gentle fostering influence. It is simultaneously a destroyer and
preserver. The wind destroys in order to create something new. It drives away all the dead
leaves- “Young, and black, and pale, and hectic red,/ Pestilence- stricken multitudes”
because they pose obstacles to new germination. The dry old leaves stand for old and
useless thoughts that barricade the inauguration of new and revolutionary ideas. The wind
symbolically representing a powerful force destroys the old, useless thoughts and
preserves the new ideas represented by “winged seeds”.
In the second and third stanza Shelley describes the tumultuous impact of the West Wind
in the sky and on the ocean. On the sky there is a deep commotion as the clouds are
dispersed just like the decaying leaves on the ground with the approach of the West Wind.
There comes tempestuous storm from which ‘Black rain and fire and hail will burst out’.
The west wind recreates havoc on the ocean- bed also. The Atlantic Ocean cleaves itself
into a deep chasm when the west wind raises high weaves on it. Even the sub- marine
plants, flowers on the bed of the ocean tremble in fear. The west wind is thus a
cataclysmic force that effects a phenomenal change in the natural world. Shelley was
attracted by this tremendous manifestation of the hidden power of nature. He saw it as a
symbol of the force of revolution that is necessary to change. The present life is a death
like state- it is winter of discontent and despair. If we are to bring in a spirit of hope on this
earth, we have to destroy the old world and create a new one on its wreckage.
In the fourth stanza, the poet seeks participation in the energy of the wind. He expresses
his ardent desire to accompany him in his mission of creating a new order of life but the
agonies and bitterness of life- “heavy weight of hours” have repressed his qualities. He
makes an ardent appeal to the wind to lift him like ‘a wave, a leaf, a cloud’. In the last
section, he vehemently urges the west wind to infuse its vigour and power into him, so
that he can play the ‘trumpet of prophecy’ and render his massage to mankind. He wants
to awake mankind from their ‘wintry slumber’. He expresses his ardent zeal for
regeneration's- ‘scatter, as from an unextinguished hearth/ Ashes and sparks, my words
among mankind!’ Final manifestation of hope and optimism occurs in the last two lines
“O, Wind
If winter comes, can spring be far behind?”
This establishes Shelley as a poet of inspiration; hope and optimism who sees the rays
of hope even through the worst condition.
line of the first stanza. Each line is like the branch of a fruit-tree laden with fruit to the
breaking-point.
Its Vivid Imagery
The second stanza contains some of the most vivid pictures in English poetry.
Keats’s pictorial quality is here seen at its best. Autumn is personified and presented
to us in the figure of the winnower, “sitting careless on a granary floor”, the reaper
“on a half-reaped furrow sound asleep”, the gleaner keeping “steady thy laden head
across a brook”, and a spectator watching with patient look a cider-press and the last
oozings therefrom. The reaper, the winnower, the gleaner, and the cider-presser
symbolise Autumn. These pictures make the poem human and universal because the
eternal labours of man are brought before the eyes of the reader.
The Poet’s Keen Observation of Nature
The third stanza is a collection of the varied sounds of Autumn—the choir of
gnats, the bleating of lambs, the singing of crickets, the whistling of red-breasts, and
the twittering of swallows. Keats’s interest in small and homely creatures is fully
evidenced in these lines. The whole poem demonstrates Keats’s interest in Nature and
his keen and minute observation of natural sights and sounds. Keats’s responsiveness
and sensitivity to natural phenomena is one of the striking qualities of his poetry.
Its Objectivity and its Greek Character
The poem is characterised by complete objectivity. The poet keeps himself
absolutely out of the picture. Nor docs he express any emotion whether of joy or
melancholy. He gives the objects of feeling, not the feeling itself. The poem is written
in a calm and serene mood. There is no discontent, no anguish, no bitterness of any
kind. There is no philosophy in the poem, no allegory, no inner meaning. We are just
brought face to face with “Nature in all her richness of tint and form”. The poem
breathes the spirit of Greek poetry. In fact, it is one of the most Greek compositions
by Keats. There is the Greek touch in the personification of Autumn and there is the
Greek note in the poet’s impersonal manner of dwelling upon Nature.
Felicity of Diction
We have here the usual felicity of diction for which Keats is famous. Phrases like
“mellow fruitfulness”, “maturing sun”, “hair soft-lifted”, “barred clouds” which
“bloom the soft-dying day”, “hilly bourn” are examples of Keats’s happy coinages. Nor
is poetic artifice wanting to add beauty to the verse. The alliteration in the following
lines is, for instance, noteworthy:
To smell the gourd, and plump the hazel shells
With a sweet kernel; to set budding more,
And still more, later flowers for the bees,
Until they think warm days will never cease,
For summer has o’er-brimm’d their clammy cells.
Several words here contain the same “z” sound—hazel, shells, flowers, bees, days,
cease, cells. The abundance of “m” sound in these lines is also noteworthy: plump,
more, warm, summer, brimni’d clammy.
Its Form
The rhyme-scheme in this ode is the same (except for a little variation) in all the
stanzas each of which consists of 11 lines. Thus it is a “regular” ode.
A Critic’s Comment
“Most satisfying of all the Odes, in thought and expression, is the Ode To
Autumn. Most satisfying because, for all the splendour of diction in the others, there
are times when the poetic fire dwindles for a moment, whereas in this ode, from its
inception to its close, matter and manner are not only superbly blended, but every line
carries its noble freight of beauty. The first stanza is a symphony of colour, the second
a symphony of movement, the third a symphony of sound. The artist shapes the first
and last, and in the midst the man, the thinker, gives us its human significance. Thus
is the poem perfected, its sensuous imagery enveloping as it were its vital idea.” (A.
Compton-Rickett)
David Perkins on the Ode to Autumn
A Significant Ode
David Perkins, quoting another critic, says that this ode is regarded as “a very
nearly perfect piece of style” but that it has “little to say”. However, says David Perkins,
this ode is very “significant”. Even more than Keats’s other odes, To Autumn, is
“objective, oblique and impersonal, carried scarcely at all by direct statement that
involves the poet”. Its expression, like that of the Grecian Urn or the Nightingale, is
concrete and symbolic, and as in these other odes, the symbol adopted has been
previously established in Keats’s poetry. Keats’s view of the seasons is on the whole
rather conventional: spring is the time of budding, summer of fulfilment, and winter
of death. Autumn coming between summer and winter, can be seen as the intensifying
and prolonging of summer. In other words, autumn suggests precisely that
lengthening-out of fulfilment as its crest or climax which Keats had desired to find in
the concrete world. So the poet, turning to the concrete, contemplate it with serenity.
The Imagery in the First Stanza
Autumn, accordingly, is described as a season of “mellow fruitfulness”. The sun
is ripening or “maturing” the earth, “conspiring” to load the vines and bend the apple
trees, “to swell the gourd, and plump the hazel shells”. The season fills “all fruit with
ripeness to the core”; and these images of full, inward ripeness and strain suggest that
the maturing can go no further, that the fulfilment has reached its climax. Even the
cells of the bees are over-brimmed. Yet the ripening continues, “budding more, and
still more, later flowers”. The bees “think warm days will never cease”. Thus through
the imagery the poem suggests a prolonging of fulfilment. At the same time, however,
there are indirect images of ageing. For the sun is maturing—it is not only ripening the
things, but is also growing older. So also autumn itself, the “close-bosom friend” of the
sun.
The Imagery in the Second Stanza
The second stanza picks up and continues imagery of arrested motion in the
first. Autumn is here personified in a variety of attitudes; but the dominant image is of
autumn as the harvester—and a harvester that is in a sense another reaper, death
itself. Instead of harvesting, however, autumn is motionless, death being momentarily
held off as the ripening still continues. First autumn appears “sitting careless on a
granary floor”. The granary is where the harvest would be stored, but autumn is not
bringing in the grain. The assonance and alliteration of the line, “Thy hair soft-lifted by
the winnowing wind”, leads into the image of autumn feeling drowsy or sleepy on a
half-reaped furrow—again the harvest arrested. Finally autumn is seen near a cider-
press where it watches “the last oozings hours by hours”. This is one of the two images
suggesting activity, the other being the gleaner with laden head crossing a brook; but
the motion is so slow that the reader takes the cider-press almost as a repetition of
the half-reaped furrow. But, of course, these are the last, oozings, and the harvest is
drawing to a close. The notion of death is present but it will emerge more emphatically
in the third stanza.
The Imagery in the Last Stanza; the Mood and the Thought of the Poem
Things reveal their essential identity most intensely at the moment if dying or
readiness to die. So the last stanza begins with the one comment the poet offers in his
own person. “Where are the songs of Spring?” but there is no rebellion in the answer:
“Think not of them, thou hast thy music too”. There follows an image of the day,
which, like autumn, is about to end, and the death is accompanied by a fulfilment; for
as it dies the day blooms all flowers (“While barred clouds bloom the soft-dying day”).
The stanza proceeds with images of death or withdrawal, and of song, and the songs
are a funeral dirge for the dying year. At the same time, there is a tone of tenderness
in the stanza; and the objectivity of the last few lines suggests an acceptance which
includes even the fact of death. Death is here recognised as something inherent in the
course of things, the condition and price of all fulfilment, having like the spring and
summer of life its own distinctive character or “music” which is also to be prized and
relished. In the last analysis, perhaps, the serenity and acceptance here expressed are
aesthetic. The ode is, after all, a poem of contemplation. The symbol of autumn
compels that attitude. The poet’s own fears, ambitions and passions are not directly
engaged, and hence he can be relatively withdrawn. The poet seems to suggest that
life in all its stages has a certain identity and beauty which man can appreciate by
disengaging his own ego. “Thus the symbol permits, and the poem as a whole
expresses, an emotional reconciliation to the human experience of process.”
Robin Mayhead on the Ode to Autumn
An Acceptance of Impermanence
Superficially altogether different from the Ode On Melancholy, To Autumn, is
deeply related to that poem. The Melancholy ode accepts the impermanence of
beauty and joy as inevitable. In the Ode To Autumn, impermanence is again accepted,
and accepted without the least trace of sadness because Keats is able to see it as part
of a larger and richer permanence.
The Continuity of Life
This greater permanence is the continuity of life itself, in which the
impermanence of the individual human existence is one tiny aspect of a vast and
deathless pattern. The rotation of the seasons offers a symbol of this continuity that
is immediately satisfying. When Keats, in the last stanza, refers to the “music” of
autumn, he is obviously pointing out the futility of regretting that spring has gone by.
What is past is past. After all, autumn has its own characteristic sounds, which are as
much part of the year as the songs of spring. Moreover, although autumn will be
followed by the cold and barrenness of winter, winter will in turn give way to a fresh
spring. Life goes on. The individual year may be drawing to a close, but there will be a
new year to take its place. This is indirectly conveyed with wonderful effect in the
concluding line of the ode: “And gathering swallows twitter in the skies”. In one way
the line gives a hint of the coming winter, for the swallows are gathering to migrate to
warmer climates. Yet we remember that migratory birds return when the cold
weather ends, so that the very hint of their 1’orihcoming departure carries with it a
suggestion of their re-appearance when warm days come again.
The Structure of the Poem
The handling of verse-structure is here wonderfully resourceful. The use of the
run-on line in the first stanza, for instance, is noteworthy. If “swell” and “plump” give
the outward signs of fat richness, the stress on “sweet kernel”, inevitable after the
pause at the end of the previous line, vividly makes us think of the lusciousness within.
And the imagined sweetness leads to even greater sweetness of the honey made by
the bees. The loaded abundance is suggested by the heavy movement in the last line
which describes the over-brimming of their cells. There is so much oozing sweetness
here that the honey-combs are insufficient to hold it all.
As F.R. Leavis has shown (in Revaluation), Keats employs verse-structure in the
last four lines of the second stanza to enact the very movement of the gleaner. Keats
is here able to suggest the prudent hesitation of the man (or woman) carefully
balancing his load before he crosses the brook. Again, the extreme slowness with
which the drops of cider issue from the press is suggested by the line: “Thou watchest
the last oozings, hour by hour.”
No Resentment or Horror About the Fact of Death
There are various hints of death in the final stanza, but the idea of death is not
treated with horror or resentment. The day is dying softly, the rosy “bloom” of sunset
taking away from the stark bareness of the now fully-reaped corn-fields. And, in any
case, the very reference to the close of the day, like the final line about the swallows,
carries with it a suggestion of its opposite. Just as the swallows will come back next
year, so another day will down, for the great movement of life goes on, however short
the existence of the individual.
Keats suggests that the bees have a large amount of flowers. And these flowers did not bud in
summer but now, in autumn. As a consequence, the bees are incessantly working and their
honeycombs are overflowing since summer. In both its form and descriptive surface, "To Autumn"
is one of the simplest of Keats's odes. There is nothing confusing or complex in Keats's paean to
the season of autumn, with its fruitfulness, its flowers, and the song of its swallows gathering for
migration. The extraordinary achievement of this poem lies in its ability to suggest, explore, and
develop a rich abundance of themes without ever ruffling its calm, gentle, and lovely description
of autumn. Where "Ode on Melancholy" presents itself as a strenuous heroic quest, "To Autumn"
is concerned with the much quieter activity of daily observation and appreciation. In this
quietude, the gathered themes of the preceding odes find their fullest and most beautiful
expression. Keats’s approach here is particular as the line shows:
"To Autumn" takes up where the other odes leave off. Like the others, it shows Keats's speaker
paying homage to a particular goddess--in this case, the deified season of Autumn. The selection
of this season implicitly takes up the other odes' themes of temporality, mortality, and change:
Autumn in Keats's ode is a time of warmth and plenty, but it is perched on the brink of winter's
desolation, as the bees enjoy "later flowers," the harvest is gathered from the fields, the lambs of
spring are now "full grown," and, in the final line of the poem, the swallows gather for their winter
migration. The understated sense of inevitable loss in that final line makes it one of the most
moving moments in all of poetry; it can be read as a simple, uncomplaining summation of the
entire human condition. Despite the coming chill of winter, the late warmth of autumn provides
Keats's speaker with ample beauty to celebrate: the cottage and its surroundings in the first stanza,
the agrarian haunts of the goddess in the second, and the locales of natural creatures in the third.
Keats's speaker is able to experience these beauties in a sincere and meaningful way because of
the lessons he has learned in the previous odes: He is no longer attempting to escape the pain of
the world through ecstatic rapture (as in "Nightingale") and no longer frustrated by the attempt
to eternalize mortal beauty or subject eternal beauty to time (as in "Urn"). The poem recalls earlier
poems as in the lines:
In "To Autumn," the speaker's experience of beauty refers back to earlier odes (the goddess
drowsing among the poppies recalls Psyche and Cupid lying in the grass), but it also recalls a
wealth of earlier poems. Most importantly, the image of Autumn winnowing and harvesting (in a
sequence of odes often explicitly about creativity) recalls an earlier Keats poem in which the
activity of harvesting is an explicit metaphor for artistic creation. In his sonnet "When I have fears
that I may cease to be," Keats makes this connection directly using the metaphor ‘ripen'd grain’.
In "To Autumn," the metaphor is developed further; the sense of coming loss that permeates the
poem confronts the sorrow underlying the season's creativity. When Autumn's harvest is over, the
fields will be bare, the swaths with their "twined flowers" cut down, the cider-press dry, the skies
empty. But the connection of this harvesting to the seasonal cycle softens the edge of the tragedy.
In time, spring will come again, the fields will grow again, and the birdsong will return. The
speaker knows joy and sorrow, song and silence are as intimately connected as the twined flowers
in the fields. Thus the prime note of the poem is that of optimism as the following lines reveal.
‘Ode to Autumn’ reveals not Keats’s pictorial quality only; but also a deep sense of purpose
underneath. Although the first impression may be that John Keats is simply describing the main
characteristics of autumn, and the human and animal activities related to it, a deeper reading
could suggest that Keats talks about the process of life. Autumn symbolizes maturity in human
and animal lives. Some instances of this are the ‘full-grown lambs’, the sorrow of the gnats, the
wind that lives and dies, and the day that is dying and getting dark. As all we know, the next season
is winter, a part of the year that represents aging and death, in other words, the end of life.
However, in my opinion, death does not have a negative connotation because Keats enjoys and
accepts ‘autumn’ or maturity as part of life, though winter is coming. Joys must not be forgotten
in times of trouble. Blake’s dictum, ‘Under every grief and pine/Runs a joy with silken twine.’ The
two are the part of life. Thus ‘thou has thy music too’ is the right approach to life showing the
process of maturity and optimism.
In short, what makes "To Autumn" beautiful is that it brings an engagement with that connection
out of the realm of mythology and fantasy and into the everyday world. We are part of Autumn
when it is personified and presented to us in the figure of the winnower, “sitting careless on a
granary floor”, the reaper “on a half-reaped furrow sound asleep”, the gleaner keeping “steady thy
laden head across a brook”, and a spectator watching with patient look a cider-press and the last
oozings therefrom. The reaper, the winnower, the gleaner, and the cider-presser symbolize
Autumn. Through his process, the poet has learned that an acceptance of mortality is not
destructive to an appreciation of beauty and has gleaned wisdom by accepting the passage of time
that it is engagement; not escape is the purpose of life.