EN06
EN06
net/publication/322714655
CITATIONS READS
3 419
6 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Improving vehicle road holding with using air suspension system in turning maneuver View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Ali Safaei on 26 January 2018.
Abstract— In the present paper a hydraulic hybrid propulsion two power sources in which one of them has the ability to
system for an urban bus has been designed, modeled and restore energy. Reduction of fuel consumption and air pollution
simulated. The propulsion system consists of a diesel Internal are achieved in hybrid propulsion systems by using a smaller
Combustion Engine (ICE) as the primary and a hydraulic engine size, operating the engine near its optimum BSFC 1
pump/motor (P/M) as the secondary power generation region, turning it off whenever possible and regenerating
components. The hydraulic accumulators have been used as the braking energy. Moreover, hybrid vehicles do not need any
energy storage components. The two power generating additional fleet infrastructure. Hybrid propulsion systems are
components have been connected to the driven shaft through a divided in two main branches: electrical hybrid which has an
post-transmission torque coupling. For designing of hybrid
electric unit as the secondary power source and mechanical
propulsion system, the initial sizing of two power generation
components has been performed by using MATLAB software.
hybrid that uses a mechanical component to generate and store
Then, the hydraulic hybrid propulsion components have been energy. Furthermore, there exists three types of mechanical
modeled in the MATLAB/Simulink and are combined to form a hybrid powertrain i.e., flywheel, hydraulic and pneumatic.
feed-forward model of the hydraulic hybrid bus. In addition, a Among the mechanical hybrid propulsion systems the
control strategy has been designed so as to distribute appropriate hydraulic one is most attractive due to extended field of
torque among the hybrid power generation components. This application in vehicle industry. In comparison with hybrid
control strategy also includes regenerative braking. After the electric vehicle (HEV), a hydraulic hybrid vehicle (HHV) has
designing and modeling of the hydraulic hybrid bus, its operation larger power and lower energy densities. This characteristic of
has been simulated in the Tehran and the Nuremburg drive HHV is useful for transient driving modes of vehicle like
cycles and assessment of fuel consumption and performance are acceleration and braking. In addition, the round-trip efficiency
obtained. In comparison to the conventional bus, at least 26 of hydraulic hybrid propulsion system is much higher than the
percent reduction in the fuel consumption of the hydraulic electric one [1].
hybrid bus has been achieved by the simulation results.
Urban buses are the best choice for implementing a hybrid
Keywords: Hydraulic hybrid bus, modeling, design, propulsion system due to the low speed and highly frequent
regenerative braking stop and go nature of their driving cycle. In addition, the
braking energy that is wasted during operation in an urban bus
I. INTRODUCTION is much larger than that of a passenger car. Therefore,
In recent years, rising consideration about the fossil fuel
consumption and increasing air pollution has led to
1
development of innovative propulsion systems such as hybrid Braking Specific Fuel Consumption
propulsion for vehicles. A hybrid propulsion system consists of
implementing a hydraulic hybrid on an urban bus would be a TABLE I. SPECIFICATION OF O457 BUS
reasonable decision [2].
Vehicle specifications Value
The hydraulic hybrid propulsion system contains one or Gross Weight (kg) 9820
two hydraulic Pump/Motor (P/M) as the power generating
component. Also Hydro-pneumatic accumulators are the Weight considering the passengers (kg) 14720
energy storage components in the HHV. Hydraulic hybrid Wheel radius (m) 0.466
vehicles can be divided into three configurations: serial,
Visible surface (m2) 2.0
parallel and power-split.
Rolling resistance 0.01
In serial hydraulic hybrid, ICE acts as the charger of
accumulators and a hydraulic P/M provides the required power Drag coefficient 0.55
of the vehicle. But in Parallel hydraulic hybrid architecture The Efficiency of transmission (%) 0.85
both hydraulic P/M and Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) are Gear ratio of final drive 4.2
mechanically connected to the load. Since there are few 3
changes in the mechanical components of the conventional Air density (kg/m ) 1.202
vehicle in parallel HHV, its implementation is easier and has Rotational inertia 1.05
lower cost than the series structure. A power-split hydraulic
hybrid has both parallel and serial driveline and can switch
between them. A parallel architecture is much simpler than a Among the main components, simulation results are needed
power-split one. As a result, the parallel HHV is more suitable for sizing of accumulators. In another words, generation and
for vehicle manufacturing companies. The disadvantage of consumption of energy in a drive cycle is needed in order to
parallel HHV is that the fuel consumption of engine is higher determine the required volume and number of accumulators.
than series HHV, because the ICE speed is depended to wheel Thus, the initial volume and number of accumulators has been
speed in parallel configuration. Parallel hydraulic hybrid specified according to former studies on parallel HHV. Eight
powertrains were previously demonstrated for buses in Japan in 20 liter accumulators have been chosen. The accumulators are
late 1980s and early 1990s, and are currently developed by of bladder type and the pressurized gas is Nitrogen.
Eaton, Permo-Drive and Bosch Rexroth as described in
[2].Also some studies on modeling and simulation of parallel
HHV have been organized in last decade [3, 4]. Guo-Qing Liu
et al. studied the implementation of a parallel hydraulic hybrid
powertrain for an urban bus from 2008 to 2010 [2, 5 and 6].
They have published a model for the hybrid powertrain in their
last paper. The model of hydraulic circuits has been created in
AMESim and linked with the complete MATLAB/Simulink
bus model. The efficiencies of hydraulic P/M are not taking
into account and this is the main drawback of the proposed
model.
In this study, the sizing of components in a parallel
hydraulic hybrid (PHH) powertrain for an urban bus has been
performed at first. Then a feed-forward model for the bus
powertrain has been generated in MATLAB/Simulink. In this
model, the efficiencies of hydraulic P/M are taken into account
by use of look-up tables. Finally, the model is simulated in two Figure 1- The schematic diagram of PHH powertrain
different drive cycles by using a rule-based control strategy.
The conventional bus is also modeled similarly for purpose of
comparing the results. As can be seen from Fig. 1, the hybrid system has a post-
transmission torque coupling. The advantage of post-
transmission torque coupling over the pre-transmission one is
II. DESIGNING OF PROPULSION HYBRID SYSTEM that in the former torque of each power sources are
The PHH powertrain is performed on O457 urban bus. This appropriately improved according to its nature.
bus is manufactured by IKCO 2 . The required power in
conventional O457 bus is provided by 220 kW OM457LA In order to design the initial sizes of ICE and hydraulic
engine which has maximum torque of 1250 Nm. The design P/M, a code has been generated by MATLAB. For an urban
specification of the conventional bus is shown in Table I. bus in that code, gradeability constraint is set as cruising in 35
km/h on 10 percent grade and acceleration constraint is
The proposed PHH propulsion system can be seen in Fig. 1. reaching the 65 km/h from stationary in 60 seconds. The
Internal combustion engine, hydraulic P/M, transmission and maximum powers of both power sources have been determined
accumulators are the main components of the system. while satisfying the performance constraints. For easier
implementation of PHH on the bus, the designing process is
performed considering the least possible changes in the
powertrain. Finally the initial specification of PHH powertrain
components is as mentioned in Table II.
2 Iran Khodro COmpany
TABLE II. THE SPECIFICATION OF INITIAL HYDRAULIC HYBRID have been used to determine the efficiencies of the hydraulic
POWERTRAIN COMPONENTS
P/M. In these equations ݔܽ݉and ݒݍare determined by the map
of Fig. 2. It should be noted that these efficiencies are for the
Component Specifications pump mode operation of hydraulic P/M. However, the above
efficiencies can be used for motor mode operation with high
OM906LA
ICE Max power : 205 kW accuracy. This claim would be true according to comparison
Max torque : 1100 Nm between the efficiencies map of available hydraulic axial piston
A4VSO
P/M’s in their both pump and motor operation.
Max power : 131 kW
Hydraulic P/M
Max torque : 696 Nm
Maximum displacement : 125 cc/rev
Automatic transmission
Gearbox
( the one used in conventional drivetrain )
8 bladder type
Accumulators Maximum operating pressure : 345 bar
Nominal Volume : 20 liters ( each one )
P/M. 30
speed (km/h)
0
In the proposed control strategy, the values of desired 0 100 200 300 400 500 600
time (s)
torque of both power sources have been determined in such a
way that the command signal frequencies are not high. The Figure 7 - bus and drive cycle speeds
reliability of model would be reduced when high frequencies
exist in these signals. The implementation of this control
strategy has been performed by a state-flow block.
600
400
procedure is as follow: At first number of accumulators are 200 220 240 260 280 300
time (s)
320 340 360 380 400
300
14% slope 35 km/h 21 km/h
200
100
0
200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 VII. CONCLUSION
time (s)
Figure 9 - ICE Torque (Nm)
In this paper, a parallel hydraulic hybrid powertrain for an
urban bus has been designed, modeled and simulated. The
powertrain consists of a diesel ICE as the primary and a
100
hydraulic P/M as the secondary power sources. Also, the
90
hydraulic accumulators have been used as the energy storage
80
components. The two power sources have been connected to
the driven shaft through a post-transmission torque coupling.
SOC changes (%)
70
Fuel ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Fuel
Consumpti
on of
Consumpti
Reduction of
Mean This work was supported by Institute of Fuel Consumption
Drive on of absolute Optimization (IFCO) and Vehicle, Fuel and Environment
Convention Fuel
Cycle Hybrid Bus error Research Institute (VFERI) of University of Tehran in
al Bus Consumption
(lit in 100 ( km/h )
(lit in 100
km)
(%) cooperation with Isfahan University of Technology.
km)
Tehran 69.5 49.5 28.8 0.9 REFERENCES
Nurem [1] Y.J. Kim, Z. Filipi, “Simulation study of a series hydraulic hybrid
70.6 52.2 26.1 0.4 propulsion system for a light truck,” SAE 2007 Commercial Vehicle
burg
Engineering Congress & Exhibition, October 2007, Rosemont, IL, USA,
Session: Hydraulic Hybrid System Technology (Part 1 of 2).
In simulation stage, the performance of the hybrid bus is [2] Y. YAN, G. LIU and J. CHEN, “Integrated modeling and optimization
of a parallel hydraulic hybrid bus,” International Journal of Automotive
tested, too. The ability of bus to accelerate and its gradeability Technology, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 97−104 (2010).
are two parameters which are known as the performance of [3] B. Wu, C.-C. Lin, Z., Filipi, H. Peng, and D. Assanis, “Optimization of
bus. The results of performance simulations for both power management strategies for a hydraulic hybrid medium truck,”
conventional and hybrid bus are presented in Table IV. As can Proc. AVEC’02, 6th Int. Symp. Advanced Vehicle Control, September
be seen the ability of hybrid bus in acceleration is the same as 9−13, 2002, Hiroshima, Japan.
the conventional bus. But the gradeabilty of hybrid bus is lower [4] Y.J. Kim, “Integrated modeling and hardware-in-the-loop study for
than the conventional one. systematic evaluation of hydraulic hybrid propulsion options,” in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for degree of Doctor of Philosophy in
Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2008.
TABLE IV. COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCES FOR CONVENTIONAL AND [5] G.Q. Liu, Y.C. Yan, J. Chen, T.M. Na, “Simulation and Experimental
PHH BUSES Validation Study on the Drive Performance of a New Hydraulic Power
Assist System,” Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2009 IEEE.
Performance Conventional [6] Y.Y. Cui, G.Q. LIU and J. CHEN, “Parameters design strategies of a
Constraint PHH Bus parallel hydraulic hybrid bus,” IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion
Criteria Bus
Conference (VPPC), September 3-5, 2008, Harbin, China.
0 to 25 km/h 3.3 s 4.6 s
Acceleration 25 to 35 km/h 2.5 s 2.4 s
35 to 40 km/h 1.4 s 1.2 s