03 NetApp Storage On Demand
03 NetApp Storage On Demand
cut IT spending in half ? avoid building a new data center ? take your applications further ? get to market faster ? adapt storage need ?
47% reduction in total IT cost over 5 years 28% reduction in storage 50% reduction in operational expenses
3
Power savings of $2.4M/year Backup window reduced from 96 hours to 15 - 31 minutes 8-month ROI
Higher customer satisfaction through increased service levels at lower cost Fast single mailbox recovery Higher storage utilization Exchange team can self-serve storage needs Eliminate tape backups
5
Reduced cloning time from 4 days to 2 hours Cut database recovery time by 80% Increased margins by 7% Shrank storage requirements 50% Implemented robust DR
6
FAS6080
FAS6070
FAS6030
1 PB (FC/SATA)
11
12
13
Back-Up Redesign
Why now?
Media Telco HealthCare
Why disk-based?
Technology Finance
14
15
Economies of scale:
R&D investment Lower cost Pervasive skill set
Why now?
Server virtualization NFS for VMware
10% 0 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
Source: IDC Worldwide Disk Storage Systems 2007 2011 Forecast Update, Doc#209490, Dec 07
2008 NetApp. All rights reserved. 16
17
Typical reqirements :
Networked storage Thin provisioning, cloning Dedupe Fast BR NAS & SAN Scalable High availability infra
Physical Servers
10 Million 8 Million 6 Million 4 Million 2 Million 0
Source:
Virtual Machines
06 07 08 09 10 11
Sources: Gartner Survey (11/2006. N=215), IDC, Thom. Weisel, Forrester, and VMware S-1 18
19
Ecosystem changes
Finance, economy, social turbulences Energy costs Sustainable development not an option Versatile demand
Thank you
21