ETHICS REPORT HANDOUT Module 5
ETHICS REPORT HANDOUT Module 5
“CULTURAL RELATIVISM”
Learning Outcomes
At the end of this module, the students should be able to:
1. define cultural relativism;
2. learn and analyse the strengths and weaknesses of cultural relativism; and
3. draw moral insights from the challenges of cultural relativism.
Cultural Relativism
- Adheres to the idea that ethical
norms differ from one society or
culture to another. Moral norms are
not permanent; they change
according to time, place, and
circumstances.
- Implies that there are no universal
norms of morality, that morality is
different from one culture to another.
If the plurality of cultures is
respected, no culture will be
perceived as superior over the
others.
Tolerance means that people should try to understand and respect the beliefs, traditions,
and practices of the cultures of others.
Missionary anthropologist said, “Take off your shoes because the ground you are
standing on is sacred.”
Another quote bears the essence of cultural relativism: “When you are in Rome, live
as the Romans do.” The feeling and attitude of superiority, intolerance, and impatience
towards cultural differences must be avoided and rejected.
Respect and tolerance are highly encouraged in interacting with other cultures.
However, this comes with the risk that even wrong actions can be tolerated and justified,
blurring the line between right and wrong.
1
- Cultural relativism counters the attitude of intolerance, arrogance, and
dominance. Cultural relativism promotes deeper understanding and respect
which is the key to better relationships among diverse cultures.
Culture is relative. Cultural relativism implies that there are no universal norms
of morality.
With globalization, the atmosphere of increasing global cooperation and unity at
present requires understanding foreign cultures. However, respect and
tolerance do not mean that all ideas and practices, no matter how wrong they
are will be accepted and supported.
Standards of behaviour must be understood within the context of the common
good of humanity.
DISCUSSANT:
JOANNIE MAE P. LAMELA BEED – 4