Disciplinary Action
Disciplinary Action
Both types of activities seek to condition employee behaviour in order to achieve good discipline in
the organisation.
Rather, a certain type of behaviour is called for, and the employee is informed of the nature of that
behaviour and the reason for it. If it requires a penalty to generate that type of behaviour, then
disciplinary action must be taken. Rules and regulations are fixed in such areas as attendance, safety,
theft, insubordination, intoxication, fighting, dishonesty, solicitations, smoking and housekeeping.
With reasonable authority possessed by the supervisor and the employees knowing well what is
expected of them, the basis of disciplinary action has been established. When an offence takes place,
it is important to establish and maintain proper records concerning the nature of the event, the
participants and the work environment. Record should also be kept of any taken by the supervisor.
Such written evidence is highly important, if the event forms the basis for a grievance filed by the
employee. Thus, in modern management’s increasingly legalistic environment, written records
constitute a third basic element of a well-organised disciplinary action programme.
In taking disciplinary action, the attitude of the supervisor is very important. One should be objective
in collecting facts. One should approach the problem, if possible, with a non-judicial attitude. If a
mistake is made in the handling of a grievance, then the problem will not be solved.
Making a mistake in disciplining someone who does not deserve it could well mean a permanent
destruction of the morale of the employee and a general loss of respect for the supervisor.
When management is dissatisfied with the behaviour of an employee, its goal is to effect a change
more consistent with organisation requirements. Penalties or punishments constitute only one means
of doing this, and should be used as a last resort. The attitude of the immediate supervisor should be
one of counselling and understanding, rather than ‘police and punish’.
2. Written warning:
The second step in the progressive discipline process is the written warning. In effect, it is the first
formal stage of the disciplinary procedure. This is so because the written warning becomes part of the
employee’s official personnel file. This is achieved by not only giving the warning to the employee
but sending a copy to the personnel department to be inserted in the employee’s permanent record.
3. Suspension:
A suspension or lay-off would be the next disciplinary step, usually taken if the prior steps have been
implemented without the desired outcome. If the infraction is of a serious nature, suspension is
ordered without any prior verbal or written warning.
A suspension may be for one day or several weeks; disciplinary lay-offs in excess of a month are rare.
A short lay-off, without pay, is potentially a rude awakening to problem-employees. It may convince
them that management is serious, and force them into accepting responsibility for following the
organisation’s rules.
4. Demotion:
If suspension has not been effective and management wants to avoid dismissing the problem-
employee, demotion may be an alternative. Demotion is a disciplinary action whereby an individual is
sent back to a lower position in the company. However, it tends to demoralise not only the employee
but the co-workers (peers) as well. Moreover, it is not a temporary action. It is a constant punishment
to the demoted employee and hence has broad motivational implication.
5. Pay-cut:
Another alternative, also rarely applied in practice, is cutting the problem-employee’s pay. The pay
cut usually has a demoralising effect on the employee, and is suggested as a rational action by
management if the only other alternative is dismissal.
6. Dismissal:
Management’s ultimate disciplinary punishment is dismissing the problem employee. Dismissal
should be used only for the most serious offences. Yet it may be the only feasible alternative when an
employee’s behaviour is so bad as to seriously interfere with a department’s or the whole
organisation’s operation.
All organisations designate a series of offences which, for some reason or other, constitutes matters of
serious or gross misconduct and for which suspension from work or dismissal may be applied. It is
normally accepted that such offences constitute breaches of the law vandalism, violence, theft and
fraud.
However, in certain cases, this may be extended to standards of behaviour on the part of the particular
organisation for example; failure to wear safety clothing on a building site may constitute a sufficient
reason for dismissal, whereas this would not apply to other situations.