Procrustes from Greek mythology would invite travelers to stay at his home, claiming he had a magical bed that would fit anyone regardless of size. However, he would either cut off or stretch the legs of guests to forcibly make them fit the exact dimensions of the bed, giving rise to the term "Procrustean bed" to describe an arbitrary standard that requires exact conformity. In psychology, a Procrustean approach refers to therapists having a single treatment method that they use for all clients rather than modifying their approach to fit individual needs.
Procrustes from Greek mythology would invite travelers to stay at his home, claiming he had a magical bed that would fit anyone regardless of size. However, he would either cut off or stretch the legs of guests to forcibly make them fit the exact dimensions of the bed, giving rise to the term "Procrustean bed" to describe an arbitrary standard that requires exact conformity. In psychology, a Procrustean approach refers to therapists having a single treatment method that they use for all clients rather than modifying their approach to fit individual needs.
WAS A HOST WHO INVITED PASSERS-BY TO HIS HOUSE, CLAIMING THAT ALL VISITORS, WHATEVER THEIR SIZE, WOULD FIT THE BED IN HIS GUEST ROOM. SUCH A GRAND AND MAGICAL CLAIM ATTRACTED A LOT OF ATTENTION. WHAT PROCRUSTES DID NOT TELL HIS GUESTS WAS THAT HE WAS WILLING TO EITHER CUT OFF HIS GUEST’S LEGS OR STRETCH THEM ON A RACK TO MAKE THEM FIT THE BED. In the Greek myth, Procrustes was a son of Poseidon. He had a bed in which he insisted that every passer-by spend the night. If a guest was shorter than the bed, Procrustes would set to work on them with his smith's hammer to stretch them to fit. If the guest proved too tall, Procrustes would amputate the excess length because Procrustes demanded an exact fit. Hence, a Procrustean bed is an arbitrary standard to which exact conformity is forced. Therapists who employ Procrustean bed approaches to psychological treatment basically have a single method or intervention that they use on everyone. Rather than modifying their therapeutic approach to fit the needs of unique individuals, they insist their clients conform to their preferred method. CASE CONCEPTUALIZATION Identifying the various factors on understanding OBJECTIVE the clients’ nature of the problem. CASE CONCEPTUALIZATION Includes the counselor’s hypothesis about the causes, precipitants, and maintaining influences of a person’s problem. It delves into the why, when, with whom, and how a client’s concern developed (Eells, 1997). Focuses on identifying and connecting the primary problems and their predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating factors. It also assesses the severity of the psychosocial stressors and the highest level of functioning that the individual can use to handle the concern. PRESENTING PROBLEM/REASON FOR REFERRAL oPresenting Problem- term used if the client voluntarily enters counseling or assessment oReason for Referral- term used if the person was referred by someone (by family members, friends, authorities such as teachers and police, other health professionals, etc.) othe initial symptom for which a person seeks help from a therapist, doctor, psychiatrist, or other provider. oNot necessarily the most serious problem, or even the one that will lead to the most accurate diagnosis. oFor example, when a person goes to the doctor complaining of a rapid heart rate, the doctor might ask about his/her stress level to determine if the problem is a cardiac one or related to anxiety. ELEMENTS OF CASE The 4Ps CONCEPTUALIZATION PREDISPOSING FACTORS Causes; Remote past- Includes childhood/home factors PRECIPITATING FACTORS Precipitants; Immediate past- what just happened that triggered the problem PERPETUATING FACTORS Maintaining influences; Current psychosocial and environmental factors that maintain the problem and affect the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis PROTECTIVE FACTORS Strength; conditions or attributes (skills, strengths, resources, supports or coping strategies) in individuals, families, communities or the larger society that help people deal more effectively with stressful events and mitigate or eliminate risk in families and communities. HIGHEST LEVEL OF FUNCTIONING oGood, Fair, Poor oClient’s overall level of functioning- capacity to think and decide independently and to act upon the decision oMay be assessed through psychological tests or interview RECOMMENDED TREATMENT oWhat needs to be done with what the client is experiencing oAppropriate counseling approaches, techniques and procedures ASSESSMENT OF PROGNOSIS oGood, fair, or poor oPrognosis- likelihood of development of a disease; will it get better or worsen over time? oPrediction of the outcome of a problem or treatment REFERENCES PsychDB. (2020, February). Biopsychosocial Model and Case Formulation. Retrieved from PsychDB: https://www.psychdb.com/teaching/intermediate/biopsychosocial- formulation Villar, I. (2011). Counseling and psychotherapy in the Philippines. Makati: Aligned Transformations Publications. Walter, I. (2018, June). How to write a case summary. Retrieved from Family Therapy Basics: https://familytherapybasics.com/blog/therapy-case-summary
Download Complete (Ebook) Theories of Counseling and Psychotherapy: A Case Approach by Nancy L. Murdock ISBN 9780132286527, 0132286521, 2007046223 PDF for All Chapters