Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Step 4 - Identify Recovery Options
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Step 4 - Identify Recovery Options
Activity Description
This course is offered in English and as it is specified in the Rules and conditions for
course development: Contributions in different languages won´t be taken into
account”.
Individual
The student must develop the following activities:
1. Each student reads and reviews all the references for Unit 2 at the Learning
environment.
2. Each student selects a recovery option of the reverse logistics processes from the
following chart:
1
final document to the
Evaluation
Environment:
3. According to the understanding of the references and your own research on internet,
each student of the group must design a creative one-page infographic to explain the
recovery option selected, including:
• Student name
• Group number
• Date
• The recovery option selected
• The important concepts
• An example of the option
Collaborative
4. Base on the understanding of the references and the review of all student´s
infographics, the group selects a common waste to apply the recovery options, posting
the vote in the following chart:
2
5. Each student records a 2 minutes video, where they appears using their
camera, showing the PowerPoint presentation, introducing themselves, explaining the
waste selected and the recommendations as a consultor.
The suggested tools to make the video are Screencast, Loom, Icecream Screen
Recorder.
Save the video in YouTube or any other resource to get a public link and share
it in the Discussion Forum.
5. All students in the group read and review the activities developed by the
other members, consolidate all evidences in a PDF document and the student selected
in Activity 2, submits it at the Evaluation Environment, according to the
guidelines given below in section Collaborative Work Evidences, naming it with
the following structure:
Review the agenda to identify the deadline, visit the General Forum and visit the
Synchronous attention by SkypePage to identify the tutor user.
Review the syllabus of the course, the guide to solve the activity, and post activities
in the discussion forum.
Submit the final document as a PDF with the structure indicated in this guide.
Each student posts on the Discussion forum a infographic according to Activity 3 and
a video link related to Activity 5.
3
Evidences of collaborative work:
The collaborative evidence to be submitted is:
• All members of the group must participate with their contributions in the
development of the activity.
• In each group, a single member will be chosen to submit the requested product
in the environment indicated by the teacher.
• Before submitting the requested product, students should check that it meets all
the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.
4
• Only the members of the group that participated with contributions during the
time assigned for the activity should be included as authors of the submitted
product.
Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.
Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)
5
Identify the If your work is at this level, you can get between 25 points
recovery optiopns and 30 points
6
Low level: The student does not record a video evidencing the
understanding of recovery options.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1
points and 0 points
Third evaluation High level: The student submits at the Evaluation
criterion: Environment, a PDF document according to the given guidelines,
evidencing proper grammar and spelling, presenting a proper
Present the development of the activities proposed.
document according
to the specified If your work is at this level, you can get between 15 points
format and and 20 points
guidelines
Average level: The student submits a document, developing
part of the proposed activities, evidencing some spelling and
grammar mistakes or missing some guidelines.
This criterion
represents 20 If your work is at this level, you can get between 2 points
points of the total and 14 points
of 120 points of
the activity. Low level: The student does not submit the document
evidencing his own development of the proposed activities.
7
8