ROUND TABLE CONFERENCES

ROUND TABLE
CONFERENCES
(1930-1932)
The Indian political community received the Simon Commission Report issued in
June 1930 with great resentment. Different political parties gave vent to their
feelings in different ways.
The Congress started a Civil Disobedience Movement under Gandhi’s command.
The Muslims reserved their opinion on the Simon Report declaring that the report was
not final and the matters should be decided after consultations with the leaders
representing all communities in India.
The Indian political situation seemed deadlocked. The British government
refused to contemplate any form of self-government for the people of India. This
caused frustration amongst the masses, who often expressed their anger in violent
clashes.
The Labor Government returned to power in Britain in 1931, and a glimmer of
hope ran through Indian hearts. Labor leaders had always been sympathetic to the
Indian cause. The government decided to hold a Round Table Conference in London to
consider new constitutional reforms. All Indian politicians; Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs and
Christians were summoned to London for the conference.
Gandhi immediately insisted at the conference that he alone spoke for all
Indians, and that the Congress was the party of the people of India. He argued that
the other parties only represented sectarian viewpoints, with little or no significant
following.
First Round Table Conference
The first session of the conference opened in London on November 12, 1930. All
parties were present except for the Congress; whose leaders were in jail due to the
Civil Disobedience Movement. Congress leaders stated that they would have nothing
to do with further constitutional discussion unless the Nehru Report was enforced in
its entirety as the constitution of India.
Almost 89 members attended the conference, out of which 58 were chosen
from various communities and interests in British India, and the rest from princely
states and other political parties. The prominent among the Muslim delegates invited
by the British government were Sir Aga Khan, Quaid-i-Azam, Maulana Muhammad Ali
Jouhar, Sir Muhammad Shafi and Maulvi Fazl-i-Haq. Sir Taj Bahadur Sapru, Mr. Jaikar
and Dr. Moonje were outstanding amongst the Hindu leaders.
 The Muslim-Hindu differences over casted the conference as the Hindus were
pushing for a powerful central government while the Muslims stood for a loose
federation of completely autonomous provinces. The Muslims demanded maintenance
of weightage and separate electorates, the Hindus their abolition. The Muslims
claimed statutory majority in Punjab and Bengal, while Hindus resisted their
imposition. In Punjab, the situation was complicated by inflated Sikh claims.
Eight subcommittees were set up to deal with the details. These committees
dealt with the federal structure, provincial constitution, franchise, Sindh, the North
West Frontier Province, defense services and minorities.
The conference broke up on January 19, 1931, and what emerged from it was a
general agreement to write safeguards for minorities into the constitution and a
vague desire to devise a federal system for the country.
GANDHI-IRWIN PACT

After the conclusion of the First Round Table Conference, the British
government realized that the cooperation of the Indian National Congress was
necessary for further advancement in the making of the Indian constitution. Thus,
Lord Irwin, the Viceroy, extended an invitation to Gandhi for talks. Gandhi agreed to
end the Civil Disobedience Movement without laying down any preconditions.
The agreement between Gandhi and Irwin was signed on March 5, 1931.
Following are the salient points of this agreement:
     The Congress would discontinue the Civil Disobedience Movement.
     The Congress would participate in the Round Table Conference.
     The Government would withdraw all ordinances issued to curb the Congress.
     The Government would withdraw all prosecutions relating to offenses not
involving violence.
     The Government would release all persons undergoing sentences of
imprisonment for their activities in the civil disobedience movement.
The pact shows that the British Government was anxious to bring the Congress
to the conference table.

SECOND ROUND TABLE CONFERENCE

The second session of the conference opened in London on September 7, 1931.
The main task of the conference was done through the two committees on federal
structure and minorities. Gandhi was a member of both but he adopted a very
unreasonable attitude. He claimed that he represented all India and dismissed all
other Indian delegates as non-representative because they did not belong to the
Congress.
The communal problem represented the most difficult issue for the delegates.
Gandhi again tabled the Congress scheme for a settlement, a mere reproduction of
the Nehru Report, but all the minorities rejected it.
 As a counter to the Congress scheme, the Muslims, the depressed classes, the
Indian Christians, the Anglo-Indians, and the Europeans presented a joint statement of
claims which they said must stand as an interdependent whole. As their main
demands were not acceptable to Gandhi, the communal issue was postponed for
future discussion.
Three important committees drafted their reports; the Franchise Committee,
the Federal Finance Committee and States Inquiry Committee.
On the concluding day, the British Prime Minister, Ramsay MacDonald appealed
to the Indian leaders to reach a communal settlement. Failing to do so, he said, would
force the British government would take a unilateral decision.
Quaid-i-Azam did not participate in the session of the Second Round Table
Conference as he had decided to keep himself aloof from the Indian politics and to
practice as a professional lawyer in England.
On his return to India, Gandhi once again started Civil Disobedience Movement
and was duly arrested.

THIRD ROUND TABLE CONFERENCE

The third session began on November 17, 1932. It was short and unimportant.
The Congress was once again absent, so was the Labor opposition in the British
Parliament. Reports of the various committees were scrutinized. The conference
ended on December 25, 1932.
The recommendations of the Round Table Conferences were embodied in a
White Paper. It was published in March 1933, and debated in parliament directly
afterwards, analyzed by the Joint Select Committee and after the final reading and
loyal assent, the bill reached the Statute Book on July 24, 1935.

THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ACT 1935

The  Government of India Act 1935  was the last constitution of British  India. It lasted until
1947, when British India was split into Pakistan and  India. The Act gave Indian provinces more
independence. It allowed the establishment of an All India  Federation.

After the failure of the Third Round Table Conference, the British government gave
the Joint Select Committee the task of formulating the new Act for India. The Committee
comprised of 16 members each from the House of Commons and House of Lords, 20
representatives from British India and seven from the princely states. Lord Linlithgow was
appointed as the president of the Committee. After a year and a half of deliberations, the
Committee finally came out with a draft Bill on February 5, 1935. The Bill was discussed in
the House of Commons for 43 days and in the House of Lords for 13 days and finally, after
being signed by the King, was enforced as the Government of India Act, 1935, in July 1935.
The main features of the Act of 1935 were:
     A Federation of India was promised for, comprising both provinces and states. The
provisions of the Act establishing the federal central government were not to go into operation until a
specified number of rulers of states had signed Instruments of Accession. Since, this did not happen,
the central government continued to function in accordance with the 1919 Act and only the part of
the 1935 Act dealing with the provincial governments went into operation.
     The Governor General remained the head of the central administration and enjoyed wide
powers concerning administration, legislation and finance.
     No finance bill could be placed in the Central Legislature without the consent of the
Governor General.
     The Federal Legislature was to consist of two houses, the Council of State (Upper House)
and the Federal Assembly (Lower House).
     The Council of State was to consist of 260 members, out of whom 156 were to be elected
from the British India and 104 to be nominated by the rulers of princely states.
     The Federal Assembly was to consist of 375 members; out of which 250 were to be
elected by the Legislative Assemblies of the British Indian provinces while 125 were to be nominated
by the rulers of princely states.
     The Central Legislature had the right to pass any bill, but the bill required the approval of
the Governor General before it became Law. On the other hand, Governor General had the power to
frame ordinances.
     The Indian Council was abolished. In its place, few advisers were nominated to help the
Secretary of State for India.
     The Secretary of State was not expected to interfere in matters that the Governor dealt
with, with the help of Indian Ministers.
     The provinces were given autonomy with respect to subjects delegated to them.
     Diarchy, which had been established in the provinces by the Act of 1919, was to be
established at the Center. However, it came to an end in the provinces.
     Two new provinces Sindh and Orissa were created.
     Reforms were introduced in N. W. F. P. as were in the other provinces.
     Separate electorates were continued as before.
     One-third Muslim representation in the Central Legislature was guaranteed.
     Autonomous provincial governments in 11 provinces, under ministries responsible to
legislatures, would be setup.
     Burma and Aden were separated from India.
     The Federal Court was established in the Center.
     The Reserve Bank of India was established.

Both the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League opposed the Act, but
participated in the provincial elections of winter 1936-37, conducted under stipulations of the
Act. At the time of independence, the two dominions of India and Pakistan accepted the Act
of 1935, with few amendments, as their provisional constitution