Vol 6
Vol 6
Volume 6
JIT Implementation Forms and Charts
HIROYUKI HIRANO
718 ◾ JIT Implementation Manual: Volume 6
Factory
2 The 5S’s Hard for anyone to tell what Hard for visitors to tell what goes Factory uses outlining and Good indicators and clean, neatly Clean, neatly organized with
goes where and when where and when, but workers know classification for visual control organized factory mess-prevention measures in force
3 Flow Job-shop layout, geared for Job-shop layout, geared for In-line layout, small-lot flow at In-line layout, one-piece flow at Full multi-process operations
Production large-lot production small-lot production and between processes and between processes with one-piece flow
4 Multi-process Unquestioned support for Caravan-style cooperative Flow-based cooperative operations About halfway toward achieving Smooth and complete
Operations single-skill, single-process operations smooth multi-process operations multi-process operations
operations
5 Labor Cost Wasteful motion and too many Fixed job assignments and poor Fixed job assignments, but different About halfway toward achieving Flexible job assignments, with
Reduction workers balance for each model, slightly better smooth multi-process operations narrow variation in output volume
balance
6 Kanban Push production, with retained Push production, with organized Pull production, with fixed Flexible job assignments, with Kanban and improvements
728 ◾ JIT Implementation Manual: Volume 6
inventory all over the place storage sites for in-process locations and fixed volumes wide variation in output volume
inventory
7 Visual Control Abnormalities often occur and Abnormalities often occur and Supervisors can tell when an Pull production, with kanban Immediate action is taken to
only create confusion are usually resolved in some way abnormality occurs resolve abnormalities
8 Level Once-a-month production Twice-a-month production Weekly production schedule, overall Anyone can tell when an Completely level production,
Production schedule, processes have own schedule, each process has its line has some kind of common abnormality occurs overall line has a common rhythm
rhythms own rhythm rhythm
9 Changeover Monthly changeover, requires People are aware of changeover Changeover teams and improve- Daily production schedule, over- Changeovers are within cycle times
half a day each time needs ments made in some workshops all line has a common rhythm
Single-operation changeovers
10 Quality Factory ships defective products Defective products are sorted Factory produces defective prod- Processes do not send defectives Factory builds quality in at each
Assurance and deals with customer out at final inspection and not ucts, but passes information to downstream (independent process (at-the-source inspection)
complaints shipped reduce defects inspection)
11 Standard Operation procedures are gen- Operation procedures are vaguely Standard operations implemented Standard operations planned, Standard operations and
Operations erally left up to each operator standardized in roughly the same for individual processes but not fully implemented improvements fully implemented
order
12 Human All processes require manual Some automation, but operators Human and machine work separa- Human and machine work separate, Human and machine work are sep-
Automation assistance, lots of large-lot are always present while ted; machines sometimes make but machines sometimes make arate, with no defectives, and with
equipment machines work defective items defectives some human automation devices
13 Maintenance Lots of breakdowns and Factory uses maintenance specia- Factory has follow-up maintenance Factory has preventive maintenance Factory has company-wide preven-
and Safety numerous accidents per year lists, but has occasional accidents and no major accidents and is almost accident-free tive maintenance and no accidents
Figure 16.10 List of JIT’s Major Functions and Their Five Stages of Development.
JIT Forms ◾ 729
Awareness Date:
Maintenance Revolution
and Safety The 5S’s
Human
Automation Flow
Production
Standard
Operations Multi-Process
Operations
Little League
Quality Junior Varsity
Assurance Labor Cost
Varsity Reduction
Level
Visual
Production
Control
QUANTITY OR
NO. OF POINTS
DISTANCE
RETENTION units
CONVEYANCE m
PROCESSING
INSPECTION
No. of times
No. of units Retention
Time
Summary Chart of Flow Analysis
734 ◾ JIT Implementation Manual: Volume 6
No. of times
Inspection
Lots
Date:
No. of times
No. of units Retention
Time
No. of times
Conveyance
Distance
No. of times
Processing
Lots
After improvement
No. of times
Inspection
Lots
736 ◾ JIT Implementation Manual: Volume 6
Section Operation
Operations
Analysis Table
Processes Part No. Author:
Movement
Distance
Distance
Transfer
Transfer
Description of Description of
Inspect
Inspect
Work
Work
operation operation
Time
Time
Idle
Idle
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Defect-production waste
Processing-related waste
Operation-related waste
Improvement ranking
Conveyance waste
Improvement ideas
No. Process name
Inventory waste
Process
name
Waste-finding Checklist (process-specific)
Date:
Confirmation Mag-
Major
Causes and
waste
4. Items missing
5. Defective goods produced
6. Equipment breakdowns
7. Too much manual assistance
8. Too much capacity
9. Lots grouped into batches
10. Using ”push production“
11. Caravan-style operations
12. Not balanced with next process
1. Lots of inventory on shelves and floors
2. Shelves and floor storage take up lots of space
3. Inventory stacks block walkways
Type 2. Inventory waste
Process
Name
Waste-finding Checklist (process-specific) Date:
Confirmation Mag-
Major
waste
Causes and
Description of waste
YES NO nitude improvement plans
4. Pile-up during conveyance
Type 3. Conveyance
3. Human errors
4. Defective due to missing part(s)
5. Defective due to wrong part(s)
6. Omission in processing
7. Defect in processing
8. No human automotion
9. No poka-yoke
10. No inspection with process
11. Defects not addressed by improvement
activities
12.
1. Process is not required for product function
Type 6. Motion- Type 5. Processing-
related waste
2. Turning around
3. Leaning sideways
4. Leaning over
5. Wide-arm movements
Process
Name
Waste-finding Checklist (process-specific)
Date:
Confirmation Causes and
Major
waste
6. Wrist movements
Type 6. Operation-related waste
Total
Score
5S No. Check item Description
0 1 2 3 4
1 Unneeded materials or parts? Does the inventory or in-process inventory
Seiri (proper arrangement)
and oil?
13 Is equipment inspection combined with Do operators clean their machines while
equipment maintenance? checking them?
14 Have specific cleaning tasks been Is there a person responsible for overseeing
assigned? cleaning operations?
15 Has cleanliness become a habit? Do operators habitually sweep floors and
wipe equipment without being told?
16 Is there proper ventilation? Is the room ventilated well enough to be clear
of heavy dust and odors?
Seiketsu (cleaned up)
22 Do people greet each other in the morn- Do people verbally acknowledge each
ing and say goodbye in the evening? other when they happen to meet?
23 Are people punctual about their break Do people keep their appointments and
times and meeting times? take their breaks on time?
24 Do people casually review rules and Do people check with each other to confirm
regulations when they happen to meet? rules and correct procedures?
25 Do people obey rules and regulations? Does each worker take rules and
regulations seriously?
Score
5S No. Check item Description
0 1 2 3 4
1 Unneeded items in lockers? Are there unneeded items such as books
Seiri (proper arrangement)
7 Do documents and office supplies have Are such items marked with names to
their owner’s names on them? make identification easy?
8 Are documents and office supplies easy Are documents and office supplies arranged
to use? so they are easy to pick up and put back?
9 Are documents and office supplies kept Do documents and utensils have specified
where they are supposed to be kept? storage places and are they kept there?
10 Are walkways and wall notices shown
clearly?
11 Trash or paper scraps on floors? Are floors kept clean?
12 Are windows and shelves dusty? Are windows and shelves dusted and
Seiso (cleanliness)
cleaned regularly?
13 Have specific cleaning tasks been Is there a person responsible for
assigned? overseeing cleaning operations?
14 Are trash cans allowed to overflow? Do trash cans always get emptied
before they overflow?
15 Has cleanliness become a habit? Do workers habitually sweep floors and
wipe up dirt without being told?
16 Is there proper ventilation? Is the room ventilated well enough to
be clear of duct and cigarette smoke?
Seiketsu (cleaned up)
5S Radar Chart
Workshop name:
1S Date:
(seiri or proper
arrangement)
5S 2S
(shitsuke or (seiton or
discipline) orderliness)
4S
3S
(seiketsu or
(seiso or
cleaned up)
cleanliness)
100
80
Graph
60
40
20
Score
Month
Division Date:
Date
Unneeded Equipment List
Division:
Depre-
Asset Unit Transaction Transaction Book
Item Quantity ciation Location Comments
No. value price date value
to date
Description Points 1 2 3 4 5
Needed and unneeded items are mixed together in
the workshop.
Needed and unneeded items are basically separated.
It is easy to see what is not needed.
All unneeded items are kept somewhere away from
the workshop.
All completely unnecessary items have been
disposed of.
Description Points 1 2 3 4 5
Can’t tell what things belong where and in what
amount.
Can basically tell what things belong where and
in what amount.
Workshop is using only place indicators and
item indicators.
Workshop is using place and item indicators and
outlining to make item organization visible.
Input and output from workshop are clearly indica-
ted and amount indicators are also being used.
Description Points 1 2 3 4 5
Can’t tell what things belong where and in what
amount.
Can basically tell what things belong where and
in what amount.
Workshop is using only place indicators and
jig/tool indicators.
Measures have been taken to make item placement
more visible (color coding, outlining, etc.)
Jigs and tools have been streamlined by combining
functions, etc.
Description Points 1 2 3 4 5
Workshop is left dirty for a long time.
Proper Previous
No. Process and check point Orderliness Cleanliness Total
Arrangement total
Creation date:
P-Q Analysis Chart
Creation by:
100%
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Quantity (Q)
Empty
Total
Part (P)
Time
Process
name
NO
Factory:
Delivery Company
Evaluation Chart Name/Dept. of evaluator: Date:
Total
Main Manager method deliveries route
No. Company (delivery
product (in-house)
company) 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3
Department
JIT Delivery
Efficiency List Month: By: Date:
Order JIT delivery a: c:
b: d: Comments
Main volume efficiency
Rank
No. Company
product Evaluation
b (–2) a (–1) J c (–3) d (–4)
points
( %) ( %) ( %) ( %) ( %)
( %) ( %) ( %) ( %) ( %)
( %) ( %) ( %) ( %) ( %)
( %) ( %) ( %) ( %) ( %)
( %) ( %) ( %) ( %) ( %)
( %) ( %) ( %) ( %) ( %)
( %) ( %) ( %) ( %) ( %)
( %) ( %) ( %) ( %) ( %)
( %) ( %) ( %) ( %) ( %)
( %) ( %) ( %) ( %) ( %)
( %) ( %) ( %) ( %) ( %)
( %) ( %) ( %) ( %) ( %)
( %) ( %) ( %) ( %) ( %)
Process no.
Operator
No. name
Production Process:
Management Operation:
rd Standard no. operators:
nda t Board
a u Previous process: Next process: By:
Time St utp
o
l
ta
To
l l l l l l l l
tua tua tua tua tua tua tua tua
Ac tput Ac tput Ac tput Ac tput Ac tput Ac tput Ac tput Ac tput
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Results
Actual Differ.
total in totals
Response to
abnormalities
90
80
70
Operating rate
60
Model
50
40
30
20
10
utilization Model month
Capacity Year/
Operator Operator
(timer)
Time
Person
Items in need Target Confirm-
No. Proposed improvement in
of improvement date ation
charge
Improvement
Operator
Date and
No. 5S checklist item plan
3-point 3-point
evaluation response
Occurrence frequency
Impact on processes
Impact on company
Inspection
in charge
Standard
Deadline
Description of
Countermeasure
Person
Operation Defect Defect
# Operation response
(machine) description cause
(evaluation)
Total points
Total points
Difficulty
Urgency
Basic times Blades and bits Per unit Total Graph time
Production
Serial Manual Auto feed Complet- Retooling Retooling retooling time
Process
Auto feed
Walking
Description Manual
Operation times (in seconds)
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Check
facilitation, etc.) and
Safety point
sec.)
Cycle time
Standard
Operations Chart
Line name
Process name
Description of operation
Date By
Revision date Revision
Pointer
Pointer
Flow Flow
production production
Multi-process Multi-process
Person in charge
operations operations Person in charge
Description of improvement
Description of improvement
control control
Leveled Leveled
production production
Deadline
Deadline
Improvement memo
Improvement memo
Other Other
5S 5S
Pointer
Pointer
Flow Flow
production production
Multi-process Multi-process
Person in charge
Person in charge
operations operations
Labor cost Labor cost
reduction reduction
Visual Visual
Description of improvement
Description of improvement
control control
Leveled Leveled
production Deadline production
Deadline
Improvement memo
Improvement memo
Jidoka Jidoka
Other Other
840 ◾ JIT Implementation Manual: Volume 6
Section or group:
List of JIT
Improvement Items By: Date:
Person Start
No. Improvement item Deadline Confirmation
in charge date
Department
Improvement Campaign
Planning Sheet Person in charge Date
Theme
T
M EN
B LE S M
O T O VE TS
PR OIN PR IN
P IM PO
S TS ACT
CO P
IM
Date
Person in charge
JIT Forms ◾ 845
Company or factory:
Weekly Report on
JIT Improvement By:
Date
Description of Problems/
Improvement items
(Day of improvement countermeasures
week)
(MON)
(TUE)
(WED)
(THU)
(FRI)
Impressions
Date:
JIT Leader’s Report
JIT leader’s name:
Person in charge:
Advice:
Conditions
Outlook