Supervise Work Based Learning - Tamayo Magesty Final
Supervise Work Based Learning - Tamayo Magesty Final
Work-Based
Learning
FORM 1.1 SELF-ASSESSMENT CHECK
INSTRUCTIONS: This Self-Check Instrument will give the trainer necessary
data or information which is essential in planning training
sessions. Please check the appropriate box of your answer to
the questions below.
CORE COMPETENCIES
CAN I…? YES NO
1. PREPARE AND PRODUCE BAKERY PRODUCTS
1.1. Prepare bakery products /
1.2. Decorate and present bakery products /
1.3. Store bakery products /
2. PREPARE AND PRODUCE PASTRY PRODUCTS
2.1. Prepare pastry products /
2.2. Decorate and present pastry products /
2.3. Store pastry products /
3. PREPARE AND PRESENT GATEAUX, TORTES
AND CAKES
3.1. Prepare sponge and cakes /
3.2. Prepare and use fillings /
3.3. Decorate cakes /
3.4. Present cakes /
3.5. Store cakes
4. PREPARE AND DISPLAY PETITS FOURS
4.1. Prepare iced petits fours /
4.2. Prepare fresh petits fours /
4.3. Prepare marzipan petits fours /
4.4. Prepare caramelized petits fours /
4.5. Display petits fours /
4.6. Store petits fours /
5. PRESENT DESSERTS
5.1. Present and serve plated desserts /
5.2. Plan, prepare and present dessert buffet /
selection or plating
5.3. Store and package dessert /
Note: In making the Self-Check for your Qualification, all required competencies
should be specified. It is therefore required of a Trainer to be well- versed of
the CBC or TR of the program qualification he is teaching.
Form 1.2: DETERMINING AND VALIDATING TRAINEES CURRENT
COMPETENCY/IES
Based on a class intake of 25 students/trainees, the space requirements and their corresponding
sizes are as follows
I.D.
Our Mission
To provide relevant and quality education and training to
out human resource responsive to the requirements
of industry specifically in the Agriculture Sector
in the province. Trainee’s No._______________
___________________
Signature Thank you and good luck!!!
Basic and Common Competencies Core Competencies
Competency Trainer’s Remarks Competency Trainer’s Remarks
Participate in workplace Prepare and produce bakery
communication products
Work in a team environment Prepare and produce pastry
products
Practice career professionalism Prepare and present gateaux,
Practice occupational health and tortes and cakes
safety procedures Prepare and display petits
Carry out measurements and fours
calculation Present desserts
Set up and operate machine/s Prepare and produce bakery
products
Perform basic maintenance
Trainee
Training Date Date Supervisor’s
Units of Competency Training Activity Rating ’s
Duration Started Finished Initial
Initial
Prepare and Produce Pastry Decorate and present July 9, July 12,
25 hours 97 %
Products pastry products 2022 2022
Store cakes
Prepare caramelized
petitd fours
Present Desserts Plan, prepare and present July 20, July 22,
dessert buffet selection or 25 hours 95 %
2022 2022
plating
Average
TOTAL 141 hours
95 %
Note: The trainee and the supervisor must have a copy of this form. The column for rating maybe used either by giving a numerical
rating or simply indicating competent or not yet competent. For purposes of analysis, you may require industry supervisors to give a
numerical rating for the performance of your trainees. Please take note however that in TESDA, we do not use numerical ratings
CLASS PROGRESS CHART
Qualification: BREAD AND PASTRY PRODUCTION NC II
BASIC COMPETENCIES COMMON COMPETENCIES CORE COMPETENCIES
hygiene procedures
Observe workplace
industry knowledge
No
Perform computer
health and safety
Student Name
safety practices
professionalism
Present desserts
tortes and cakes
communication
Practice career
Work in a team
.
DATE STARTED
DATE FINISHED
environment
procedures
operations
REMARKS
products
products
service
fours
1 Almogela, Mark C C C C C C C C C C
2 Edra, Diether Joseph C C C C C C C C C C
3 Espejo, Jaylord C C C C C C C C C C
4 Hidalgo, Kiethe C C C C C C C C C C
5 Tutop, Aldrin C C C C C C C C C C
6 Ababao, Allyson C C C C C C C C C C
7 Agne, Shirley C C C C C C C C C C
8 Albano, Dominique C C C C C C C C C C
9 Danao, Marielle C C C C C C C C C C
10 Dela Crus, Ivy C C C C C C C C C C
11 Dela Cruz, Cazel C C C C C C C C C C
12 Duldulao Krizza C C C C C C C C C C
13 Duldulao, Keith C C C C C C C C C C
14 Duldulao, Sharmaine C C C C C C C C C C
15 Dumlao, Melinda C C C C C C C C C C
16 Fernando, Angela C C C C C C C C C C
17 Gillesania, Micaella C C C C C C C C C C
18 Hidalgo, Kyla C C C C C C C C C C
19 Macatbag, Karen C C C C C C C C C C FIA
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Tutop, Aldrin
Agne, Shirley
Duldulao, Keith
Espejo, Jaylord
Almogela, Mark
Duldulao Krizza
Danao, Marielle
Ababao, Allyson
Dumlao, Melinda
Dela Cruz, Cazel
Fernando, Angela
Albano, Dominique
Student Name
Duldulao, Sharmaine
Edra, Diether Joseph
C
C
C
C
C
C
Prepare bakery products
C
C
C
C
C
C
bakery products
Bakery
Produce
Products
Prepare and
C
C
C
C
C
C
Store bakery products
C
C
C
C
C
C
Prepare pastry products
C
C
C
C
C
C
pastry products
Products
Prepare and
C
C
C
C
C
C
Store pastry products
Produce Pastry
C
C
C
C
bakery products
Prepare and produce
C
C
C
C
pastry products
C
C
C
C
gateaux, tortes and cakes
C
C
C
C
Tortes and Cakes
fours
ACHIEVEMENT CHART
Present desserts
C
C
C
C
Prepare and Present Gateux,
desserts
REMARKS
17 Gillesania, Micaella C C C C C
18 Hidalgo, Kyla C C C C C
19 Macatbag, Karen C C C C C C
20 Melencion, Kimberly C C C C C C
21 Pechon, Julie Ann C C C C C C
22 Peralta, Jessica C C C C C C
23 Polintang, Marinell C C C C C C
24 Queddeng, Angelica C C C C C C
25 Visconde, Fiona C C C C C C
LEGENDS:
- STARTED - FINISHED - - COMPETENT FIA- FOR INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT
C
MAGESTY P. TAMAYO
TRAINER
TRAINING SESSION EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS:
This post-training evaluation instrument is intended to measure how
satisfactorily your trainer has done his job during the whole duration of your
training. Please give your honest rating by checking on the corresponding cell of
your response. Your answers will be treated with utmost confidentiality.
Use the following rating scales:
5- Outstanding
4- Very Good/Very Satisfactory
3- Good/Adequate
2- Fair Satisfactory
1- Poor/Unsatisfactory
TRAINER/INSTRUCTOR 1 2 3 4 5
Interpretation:
Based on the completed training session evaluation form, under the
PREPARATION, the trainer got 1 item with a rating scale of 5 which means VERY
GOOD/VERY SATISFACTORY on item number (4 ). Expected activities/outputs are
clarified. In addition, the trainer got 3 items with a rating scale of 4 which means VERY
GOOD/VERY SATISFACTORY on the following item numbers: (1) Workshop layout
conforms with the components of a CBT workshop (2) Number of CBLM is
sufficient; and (3) Objectives of every training session is well explained. Thus, based on
this gathered data under the PREPARATION, the total score given to the trainer was 19
and the average rating was 4.75 which shows that the trainer has prepared for the
training VERY GOOD/VERY SATISFACTORY for the whole duration of the training.
Under the DESIGN AND DELIVERY, the trainer got all 10 items a rating scale of
4 which shows that the trainer has designed and delivered the training VERY
GOOD/VERY SATISFACTORY for the whole duration of the training.
Under the TRAINING FACILITIES/RESOURCES, the trainer got 3 items with a
rating scale of 4 which means VERY GOOD/VERY SATISFACTORY on the following
item numbers: (1) Training resources are adequate; (3) Equipment, Supplies, and
Materials are Sufficient; and, (4) Equipment, Supplies and Materials are suitable and
appropriate. In addition, the trainer got 2 items with a rating scale of 5 which means
OUTSTANDING on the following item numbers: (2) Training Venue is conducive and
appropriate; and, (5) Promptness in providing Supplies and Materials. Thus, based on
this gathered data under the TRAINING FACILITIES/RESOURCES, the total score given
to the trainer was 22 and the average rating was 4.4 which shows that the trainer has
VERY GOOD/VERY SATISFACTORY training facilities and resources for the whole
duration of the training.
Lastly, under SUPPORT STAFF, a scale of 4 which means VERY GOOD/VERY
SATISFACTORY was given for their accommodation.
In summary of interpretation, the trainer was rated 4.23 which means VERY
GOOD/VERY SATISFACTORY, the preparation was rated 4.75 which means VERY
GOOD/VERY SATISFACTORY; the design and delivery was rated 4.00 which means
VERY GOOD/VERY SATISFACTORY; the training facilities/resources was rated 4.40
which means VERY GOOD/VERY SATISFACTORY; and, the support staff was rated 4.00
which means VERY GOOD/VERY SATISFACTORY. Therefore, the totality of the
training will be summarized as follows:
Ratings Description
Training/Instructor 4.23 Very Good/Very Satisfactory
Preparation 4.75 Very Good/Very Satisfactory
Design and Delivery 4.00 Very Good/Very Satisfactory
Training Facilities/Resources 4.40 Very Good/Very Satisfactory
Support Staff 4.00 Very Good/Very Satisfactory
TOTAL 21.38
Average 4.276 Very Good/Very Satisfactory
MAGESTY P. TAMAYO
Trainer’s Signature
SUPERVISED INDUSTRY TRAINING OR ON THE JOB
TRAINING EVALUATION FORM
Dear Trainees:
The following questionnaire is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the
Supervised Industry Training (SIT) or On The Job Training (OJT) you had with
the Industry Partners of Marcos-Agro Industrial School, Kookee House.
Please check (/) the appropriate box corresponding to your rating for each
question asked. The results of this evaluation shall serve as a basis for improving
the design and management of the SIT in Kookee House to maximize the benefits
of the said Program. Thank you for your cooperation.
Legend:
5 – Outstanding
4 – Very Good / Very Satisfactory
3 – Good / Adequate
2 – Fair / Satisfactory
1 – Poor / Unsatisfactory
NA – not applicable
Item No. QUESTIONS Ratings
INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION 1 2 3 4 5
1 Has Marcos Agro-Industrial School conducted an
orientation about the SIT/OJT program, the requirements
and preparations needed and its expectations?
Comments/Suggestions:
Signature: ____________________
Printed Name: ____________________
Qualification: BREAD AND PASTRY PRODUCTION NC II
Host Industry Partner: KOOKEE HOUSE
Supervisor: _______________________
Period of Training: ______________________
Instructor: MAGESTY P. TAMAYO
PROGRAM EVALUATION INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS
RATER A
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Workshop layout conforms with the
components of a CBT workshop
2. Number CBLM is sufficient
3. Objectives of every training session is well
explained
4. Expected activities / outputs are clarified
RATER B
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Workshop layout conforms with the
components of a CBT workshop
2. Number CBLM is sufficient
3. Objectives of every training session is well
explained
4. Expected activities / outputs are clarified
RATER C
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Workshop layout conforms with the
components of a CBT workshop
2. Number CBLM is sufficient
3. Objectives of every training session is well
explained
4. Expected activities / outputs are clarified
AVERAGE RATINGS
PREPARATION Average
1. Workshop layout conforms with the components 3.7 Very Good/ Very
of a CBT workshop Satisfactory
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient 4.0 Very Good/ Very
Satisfactory
3. Objectives of every training session is well 4.3 Very Good/ Very
explained Satisfactory
4. Expected activities / outputs are clarified 4.0 Very Good/ Very
Satisfactory
General Average 4.1 Very Good/ Very
Satisfactory
Range:
0.00 – 1.49 = Poor/ Unsatisfactory
1.50 – 2.49 = Fair/ Adequate
2.50 – 3.49 = Good/ Satisfactory
3.50 – 4.49 = Very Good/ Very Satisfactory
4.50 – 5.0 = Outstanding
General Interpretation:
Based from the average rating of three (3) trainees, the training
preparation was Very Good/ Very Satisfactory with a rating of 4.1 which
means that the trainer complied with the required preparations prior to
the start of the training program. However, the workshop layout
preparation got the lowest rating of 3.7 since the actual workshop
components did not conform with the required CBT components.
Recommendation:
The learning materials must be stored properly in order to maintain its
neatness and completeness. Explaining the objectives clearly to the
trainees should be done before proceeding with any activity as this will
help them to understand the assigned tasks and deliver quality
outputs. For the workshop layout, it should be improved to conform
with the required CBT workshop layout for a better and more conducive
training venue.