ICLO2021 - 04 - Geographical Limitation
ICLO2021 - 04 - Geographical Limitation
Department of Finance
INSURANCE COMMISSION iCI
socoTEc B
1071 United Nations Avenue
[Manila
LegalOpinion (LO)No.: 1
This refers to your request for legal opinion dated 7 January 2021 on the subject,
particularly seeking clarification on the interpretation of Section 2 of Circular Letter No.
2020-109 dated 26 November 2020, which provides that, to wit:
This Commission hereby quotes the pertinent portion of the subject request
hereunder, y2:
Head Office, P.O. Box 3589 Manila lTrunk Line: +(632) 8523-8461 to 70 lFax No: +(632) 8522-1434 lwww.insurance.gov.ph
a. The sale process, from application to approval of their hrlRl
applications, is commenced and completed when the clients are
in the Philippines. Hence, no cross-border selling is taking place;
As regards the first (1't) question on whether your company, or any life insurer for that
matter, is "prohibited from catering to the OFW market or other clients similarly
situated,"the same should be answered in the negative.
This Commission hereby clarifies that, in the case of life insurance, the phrase
"persons x x x situated within the Philippines" used in Circular Letter No. 2020-
109 may also be construed as referring to perso ns who are permanent res idents of
the Philippines. even if the same are qainfullv emploved ide the Philippines
[Emphasis supplied.]
Accordingly, the sale of life insurance products to OFWs or similarly situated clientele
who are permanent residents of the Philippines, even if the same are gainfully
employed outside the Philippines, shall not be considered as 'bross-border selling",
which is prohibited under CL No. 2020-109.
Considering that the first (1't)question was answered in the negative, this Commission
finds no need to address the second (2"0) item and its sub-questions.
a
As regards the third (3'd) question on whether the Geographical Limitation provision
under Section 2 of CL No. 2020-109 applies "to all types of insurance producfs and
not just /'tlRl or other group life producfs, such as traditional insurance products and
variable unit-linked (VUL) products", the same should be answered in the affirmative.
It should be stressed that Section 1 of the same Circular Letter pertains lo "products,
regardless of amount of premium payable on the policy sold" without making any
distinction as regards the nature or type of said insurance "products".
Note that this legal opinion is based solely on the particular facts disclosed in the
request and relevant solely to the particular issues raised therein, and shall not be
used, in any manner, in the nature of a standing rule binding upon the Commission in
other cases whether for similar or dissimilar circumstances.
Very yours,
DEN IS B. FUNA
I nsurance Commissioner