0% found this document useful (0 votes)
94 views

CWP & ATC Tools

The document describes the history and evolution of the air traffic control automation system used at Maastricht UAC. It discusses the implementation of various technologies from 1972 to present day, including multi radar tracking in 1973, short term conflict alert in 1980, electronic flight progress strips in 1992, and data link trials in 1995. It also provides details on the transfer to a new operations room in 2002 and implementation of a new flight data processing system in 2008. Finally, it discusses several ATC topics like label components, coordination indicators, and conflict detection tools.

Uploaded by

Giulio Rotaru
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
94 views

CWP & ATC Tools

The document describes the history and evolution of the air traffic control automation system used at Maastricht UAC. It discusses the implementation of various technologies from 1972 to present day, including multi radar tracking in 1973, short term conflict alert in 1980, electronic flight progress strips in 1992, and data link trials in 1995. It also provides details on the transfer to a new operations room in 2002 and implementation of a new flight data processing system in 2008. Finally, it discusses several ATC topics like label components, coordination indicators, and conflict detection tools.

Uploaded by

Giulio Rotaru
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 81

The Controller Working Position

(Maastricht UAC Case study)


History → Current System Functionality
• 29 February 1972
• Maastricht UAC controls first flight at 23:05 UTC
• MINIFAP = MINimum Facilities Project
History → Current System Functionality

• 1 October 1973
• Maastricht Automatic
DAta Processing
(MADAP) Operational
• Multi Radar Tracking
(Mono as back-up)
• Tabular Executive
Controller messages
with Paper Strips
History → Current System Functionality

• 1980
• Short term Conflict Alert (STCA)
• 1992
• Flight Progress strips discarded
• Replaced by electronic data display
• 1995
• Preliminary Eurocontrol Trials of Air/Ground Data
Link (PETAL - FANS)
Current System

02 November 2002
Transfer to New Ops Room with New ODS

12 December 2008
New Flight Data Processing System with
ODS Upgrade

2010
FSSA Alert
= major Safety improvement
2011
Near Term Conflict Detection
AMAN Interface
2015
Radio Direction (location) Finder
ATC automation

ATC process:
Observe-Detect-Decide-Act

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER EFFICIENCY


AS A FUNCTION OF WORKLOAD
EFFICIENCY

RELAXATION STRESS AND


ZONE PANIC
ZONE

MINIMUM ERROR
ZONE

TRAFFIC
Topics
1. Normal / Magnified Labels
2. The Radar Label Colours
3. Label Composition
a) Line 0 – General Information
b) Line 1 – Callsign & SYSCO
c) Line 2 – Actual Information
d) Line 3 – Planned Information
e) Line 4 – Radar Derived Information
The Objectives
• Recognise the meaning of the different
colours in a Radar Label [1]
• State the difference between a Normal and
Magnified Label [1]
• Differentiate between incoming and outgoing
SYSCO [2]
• Extract data from the Label [3]
Normal / Magnified
• A track contains:
– Track symbol
– History symbols
– Velocity leader
– Correlation line
– Track label
A magnified track contains:
More information
Accessible fields
Radar Label Colours
• Not Involved
– white

• In-sequence
– First line green
– Other lines white
– Track symbol white
– Velocity leader white
Radar Label Colours
• First or Next
– First line green
– Other lines white
– Track symbol green
– Velocity leader green

• Current
– All green
Radar Label Colours
• Cancel assume (XASM) ==
handed over to next ATCO
– First line white
– Rest green

• Bright (highlighted)
– Blue
Radar Label Colours
• “Intruder” Mode C
– Mode C and symbol
blue
Label composition
1. Normal / Magnified Labels
2. The Radar Label Colours
3. Label Composition
a) Line 0 – General Information
b) Line 1 – Callsign & SYSCO
c) Line 2 – Actual Information
d) Line 3 – Planned Information
e) Line 4 – Radar Derived Information
Line 0
• SSR
– Mode A
– NSSR
– Mode S ID

• Left click opens SSR menu


• Middle click toggles field
Line 0
• Route / Message
Indicator
“?” or “!” ==
Info in the Flight Info
Message (FIM) window
Line 0
• Vertical monitoring warnings:

• BUST
• LVL
• TSA
• VRC
• NO FPM
Vertical Deviation
Line 0
• Sector List Status
– SKIP’D
• You remove your
sector

– BYPASS
• Your sector was
removed by previous
sector
Line 0
• Sector List Status
COLOUR
– Blue
• The sector has been taken
out of the sequence
– Green
• The sector has been taken
out of the sequence BUT
the trajectory is such that
this sector will still be next
Line 0
• Summary – Line 0
Topics
1. Normal / Magnified Labels
2. The Radar Label Colours
3. Label Composition
a) Line 0 – General Information
b) Line 1 – Callsign & SYSCO
c) Line 2 – Actual Information
d) Line 3 – Planned Information
e) Line 4 – Radar Derived Information
Line 1
• Manual Conflict Warning
– Local Conflict - Green
– Distributed Conflict -
Orange

• Moving the mouse pointer over


the square displays the graphical
VERA
Line 1
• VERA information displayed in the TPD
• Difference between MTCD and VERA?
• Difference between MTCD and VERA?
VERA
(manual conflict warning)
• VERA allows verification of the projected
minimum distance between two tracks
• Takes current speed and track to predict closest
distance
• If min sep >8NM, then predicted track symbols
stay at 8NM
• If min sep <8 NM, then predicted track symbols
will display min distance
• Track data ONLY – NO FPL data (unlike MTCD)
VERA

VERA Symbol in Label (Local) VERA Symbol in Label (Distributed)


Predicted Track Symbols and
VERA QDM Line
VERA EXAMPLE
MTCD
• Medium Term Conflict Detection
• Takes system flight path and speed into
consideration for prediction
• Needs correct track updates in order to be
accurate
• Blue line until MTCD is predictable
• Red line where MTCD is uncertain
Graphical MTCD Display
MEDIUM TERM CONFLICT DETECTION

Separation Criteria (I)


• MTCD functions consider each flight surrounded
by a safety volume (corridor)

V
L
T

V: Vertical separation (hundreds of feet)


L: Lateral separation (NM)
T: Longitudinal separation (minutes)

35
MEDIUM TERM CONFLICT DETECTION

Conflict Calculation (III)


4D Trajectory

DLH007
Sector A

current time
11:39 UTC T1
Conflict Risc Display
DLH007 11:58
4D Trajectory DLH008
DLH008

T0 T1
Time 20 Min 36
MTCD EXAMPLE
Horizontal display
Vertical display
TPD
• Tabular Problem Display
• Information on:
– VERA entries
– MTCD entries
for the corresponding aircraft pairs
First Callsign Second Callsign

MTCD VERA
predicted predicted
minimum minimum
distance distance

Problem Indicator MTCD VERA Ops


time-to-go time-to-go Sector
Display
Line 1
• Callsign

• Left click produces


the Callsign menu
Line 1
• SSR Change Indicator
– PSSR ≠ NSSR
– Normal
– CPDLC Auto Uplink
Line 1

Now take a deep breath…


Line 1
• Coordination Indicators
> Coordination Pending (ACT not out)
< Before Coordination is possible with upstream sector

> Verbal Coordination Required


< ABI but no ACT / ACT no details – ASPL Created

< Outgoing Coordination with Upstream Sector


> Outgoing Coordination with Downstream Sector

< Incoming Coordination from Upstream Sector


> Incoming Coordination from Downstream Sector
Line 1
• Sector ID
– Displayed in Mag
Label or if ID button
selected
– Forced after BYPASS
or SKIP

Left click produces the


Transfer Menu
Line 1
• Summary – Line 1
Topics
1. Normal / Magnified Labels
2. The Radar Label Colours
3. Label Composition
a) Line 0 – General Information
b) Line 1 – Callsign & SYSCO
c) Line 2 – Actual Information
d) Line 3 – Planned Information
e) Line 4 – Radar Derived Information
Line 2
• Horizontal FPM Warning
– Only displayed to current
sector
– Appears when TP needs
controller input

• Left click produces the


Route Menu
Flight Plan Monitoring (FPM)
Radar label symbols
Deviation from predicted track

• aircraft on steady track


Line 2
• Actual FL
– N-RVSM
– N-RVSM State
Approved
– Intruder
Line 2
• Attitude Indicator
– Derived from Mode C / S
– ↑ In the climb
– ↓ In the descent
– − Level

• Yellow if inserted manually


• Orange if no Mode S
Line 2
• Cleared FL
– Two digits displayed
– NFL displayed before first
assume
– CFL = AFL → Not
displayed

• Left click opens Entry or CFL


menu
Line 2
Line 2
NTCA (Near Term Conflict Alert)
Also based on track data (same as VERA)
• Short probe (2min)
– Mouse over FL in CFL/NFL menu
– Shows conflict of 3NM or less

• Long probe (8min)


– Left click and hold a level in label or CFL/NFL menu
– Shows conflict of 8NM or less
NTCA EXAMPLE
Line 2
• FSSA - The FSSA is one of the DAPs
enabled by EHS!!!
– Yellow warning displayed if FSSA ≠ CFL
– Appears 4 track updates after CFL input
– 100ft buffer

– Track symbol for which no FSSA is


available
– Vertical bar and orange attitude indicator

– Other DAPs found in the FIM


Final State Selected Altitude (FSSA)
mode S

FSSA warning No FSSA


In case of AGDL FSSA warning
uplink color has Uncorrelated track
priority over FSSA
Flight Information Window
and EHS (Enhianced Mode S data)
Line 2
• N / U / L Field 0
– N – Next sector is
adjacent and:
• NFL ≠ TFL for next
sector or
• Multiple PFL or
• PFL not between NFL
and TFL
– U – Next sector is above
– L – Next sector is below
Line 2
• Cleared Point
– Can display different items:
• HOLD
• NDS
• Cleared / Next Point
• LL
• H
• Hxxx

• Left click opens Heading menu


• Left click and hold displays the
flight leg
Line 2
• Summary – Line 2
Topics
1. Normal / Magnified Labels
2. The Radar Label Colours
3. Label Composition
a) Line 0 – General Information
b) Line 1 – Callsign & SYSCO
c) Line 2 – Actual Information
d) Line 3 – Planned Information
e) Line 4 – Radar Derived Information
Line 3
• Planned Flight Level Sequence
– Two blocks of info in line 3

• For example:
– Flight is cleared FL290
– PFL is FL390
– TFL is FL330
– (Next sector adjacent with TFL
of FL330 also) → No ‘N’
Line 3
• Left click opens either:
– FL menu or
– Entry Menu or
– SYSCO menu
Line 3
• Should the level
selected be beyond
the Cleared Target
Level
– FL is underlined for
two minutes (for
Military Partners)
Line 3
• SYSCO
– OUT

– IN
Line 3
• GFL
– Corresponds to the
furthest vertical
deviation
– Grey
– Inaccessible
Line 3
• Significant Point
– SIG PT after exit of MUAC
area if different from
cleared point or
– SYSCO request

OUT IN
Line 3
• Summary – Line 3
Topics
1. Normal / Magnified Labels
2. The Radar Label Colours
3. Label Composition
a) Line 0 – General Information
b) Line 1 – Callsign & SYSCO
c) Line 2 – Actual Information
d) Line 3 – Planned Information
e) Line 4 – Radar Derived Information
Line 4
• Ground Speed
– Calculated in Knots
• Tracked Attitude
– Derived from Mode C / S
• Vertical Rate of Change
– In hundreds of feet
– ’00’ Less than 50ft/min
– ‘++’ More than 9950ft/min
• All toggled with middle click or on
global menu
Line 4
• Left Click on Ground Speed or
VRC opens Constraint Menu

KLM1234
Line 4
• Speed Constraint
– Either imposed by controller or
requested via SYSCO
– xxx in Knots or
– Mxx and
– + ‘or more’
– - ‘or less’
– AT
– S indication of Constraint in
Normal Label
– Shows the AMAN message
request from AMS
Line 4
• VRC Constraint
– Either imposed by
controller or requested via
SYSCO
– Rxx in hundreds of ft/min
– + ‘or more’
– - ‘or less’
– AT
– R indication of Constraint in
Normal Label
Line 4
• Summary – Line 4
That’s it!
The Objectives
• Recognise the meaning of the different
colours in a Radar Label [1]
• State the difference between a Normal and
Magnified Label [1]
• Differentiate between incoming and outgoing
SYSCO [2]
• Extract data from the Label [3]

You might also like