Risk Management Plan
Risk Management Plan
Alyssa Azevedo
OGL: 421
Professor Rodgers
Risks
The deadline of Tyrell Corporations website rebuild is three months. My forecasted risk
will stay the same. My initial risks were the lack of team cohesion, lack of original design ideas,
and wrong interpretation of data analytics. Additional risk may be introduced by the stakeholders
through scope creep. With the deadline of three months, there is not much room for error. All the
risk listed can negatively impact the development of a powerful functional appealing website.
Lack of team cohesion may occur, nearly in all applicable scenarios. The coding team may lack
camaraderie which may also influence how they work with the design, data, and sales team of
the project. Being in the digital age era, many ideas are overused and become fads quickly. The
design of the website would need the ability to cross generational barriers. That way the design
of the website does not detour anyone. By giving the user the ability to choose their cookies,
some people may turn off all cookies other than necessary. This would hinder the data analyst’s
ability to form a proper forecast of buying trends and plausible gained capital. By prioritizing
communication with stakeholders, scop creep may occur as any new ideas surface.
Solutions:
Lack of team cohesion would rank first. Even though I referenced the coding team having ill
team cohesion. Lack of team cohesion can happen anywhere within the project. Between
individual teams, the stakeholders, and the team with the project manager. Having the team align
with a mission statement would be critical to the project’s success. I would want to understand
how the individuals on the team are motivated so that I can connect with the team on a individual
4
level. Hoping that it would translate to the overall team morale. Having a strong plan of sequence
events may help the team feel some structure, even though the project could change
unexpectantly. My plan for team cohesion is preventative. Scope creep with the stakeholders of
the project would rank second. The best course of action would be to understand who the
stakeholders are of the project. Understanding their wants and visions of the project before it
starts. Also, to have check ins with the stakeholders that allow them to give constructive
feedback of the project’s progression. Two check ins before halfway point of the three months.
Even though the stakeholders will be able to give feedback technically at any point, after the
second check in no more requests can be made as it will be unattainable. Unoriginal ideas would
fall in third place. The digital era allows society to cling to certain fads. It allows much of society
to be pigeonholed into trends that are fleeting. My designer would need to have a bold creative
design that would overcome trendy styles. The designer would need to understand that “Rules
and trends are present in all creative fields, and they will always be capable of tempting you
away from the newer possibilities.” (Miller 2017) Yet, not turn people away from the various
generations that buy from Tyrell Corporation. As functionality and accessibility are imperative to
the website’s success. Lastly, misinterpretation of data. Since the realm of data is changing
quickly, there is a lot of room for error. There would need to be a way of cross referencing the
data found. Also, if the sales team works with the data analyst, they may be able to come up with
plausible cost to set the products at. Giving the items a trial period, then collecting the data and
References
5
Miller, X. (2017, September 8). Take risks. break the rules. Medium. Retrieved July 8, 2022,
from https://medium.com/attack-the-front/originality-requires-risk-taking-1a6f1bb8dbae
Ong, X. (2021, January 26). The importance of team goal-setting and how to do so effectively.
Pigeonhole Live Blog. Retrieved July 8, 2022, from https://blog.pigeonholelive.com/the-
importance-of-team-goal-setting-and-how-to-do-so-effectively
Project Management Institute, Inc. (2017). A guide to the Project Management Body of
Knowledge.