The document defines and provides examples of common logical fallacies. It discusses 13 different fallacies - hasty generalization, ad hominem, missing the point, post hoc, slippery slope, weak analogy, appeal to authority, appeal to pity, appeal to ignorance, straw man, red herring, false dichotomy, begging the question, and equivocation. For each, it gives a definition and an example to illustrate how the fallacy occurs.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views
Logical Fallacies
The document defines and provides examples of common logical fallacies. It discusses 13 different fallacies - hasty generalization, ad hominem, missing the point, post hoc, slippery slope, weak analogy, appeal to authority, appeal to pity, appeal to ignorance, straw man, red herring, false dichotomy, begging the question, and equivocation. For each, it gives a definition and an example to illustrate how the fallacy occurs.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14
Hasty Generalization
• Definition: Making assumptions about a
whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate (usually because it is atypical or just too small).
• Example: "My roommate said her
philosophy class was hard, and the one I'm in is hard, too. All philosophy classes must be hard!" Ad hominem • Definition: is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.
• Example: A prosecutor asks the judge to
not admit the testimony of a burglar because burglars are not trustworthy. Missing the Point • Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion--but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.
• Example: "The seriousness of a
punishment should match the seriousness of the crime. Right now, the punishment for drunk driving may simply be a fine. But drunk driving is a very serious crime that can kill innocent people. So the death penalty should be the punishment for drunk driving." Post hoc (false cause) This fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase "post hoc, ergo propter hoc," which translates as "after this, therefore because of this."
• Definition: Assuming that because B
comes after A, A caused B.
• Examples: "President Jones raised taxes,
and then the rate of violent crime went up. Jones is responsible for the rise in crime.“ Also known as
Slippery Slope “the Camel’s Nose
• Definition: The arguer claims that a sort of
chain reaction, usually ending in some dire consequence, will take place, but there's really not enough evidence for that assumption.
• Example: "Animal experimentation reduces our
respect for life. If we don't respect life, we are likely to be more and more tolerant of violent acts like war and murder. Soon our society will become a battlefield in which everyone constantly fears for their lives. It will be the end of civilization. To prevent this terrible consequence, we should make animal experimentation illegal right now." Weak Analogy • Definition: Many arguments rely on an analogy between two or more objects, ideas, or situations. If the two things that are being compared aren't really alike in the relevant respects, the analogy is a weak one, and the argument that relies on it commits the fallacy of weak analogy.
• Example: "Guns are like hammers--they're both
tools with metal parts that could be used to kill someone. And yet it would be ridiculous to restrict the purchase of hammers--so restrictions on purchasing guns are equally ridiculous." Appeal to Authority • Definition: Often we add strength to our arguments by referring to respected sources or authorities and explaining their positions on the issues we're discussing.
• Example: "We should abolish the death
penalty. Many respected people, such as actor Johnny Depp, have publicly stated their opposition to it." . Appeal to Pity • Definition: The appeal to pity takes place when an arguer tries to get people to accept a conclusion by making them feel sorry for someone.
• Example: "I know the exam is graded
based on performance, but you should give me an A. My cat has been sick, my car broke down, and I've had a cold, so it was really hard for me to study!" Appeal to Ignorance • Definition: In the appeal to ignorance, the arguer basically says, "Look, there's no conclusive evidence on the issue at hand. Therefore, you should accept my conclusion on this issue."
• Example: "People have been trying for
centuries to prove that God exists. But no one has yet been able to prove it. Therefore, God does not exist." Straw Man • Definition: One way of making our own arguments stronger is to anticipate and respond in advance to the arguments that an opponent might make. The arguer sets up a wimpy version of the opponent’s position and tries to score point by knocking it down.
• Example: "Feminists want to ban all
pornography and punish everyone who reads it! But such harsh measures are surely inappropriate, so the feminists are wrong: porn and its readers should be left in peace." Red Herring • Definition: Partway through an argument, the arguer goes off on a tangent, raising a side issue that distracts the audience from what's really at stake. Often, the arguer never returns to the original issue.
• Example: "Grading this exam on a curve
would be the most fair thing to do. After all, classes go more smoothly when the students and the professor are getting along well." False Dichotomy • Definition: In false dichotomy, the arguer sets up the situation so it looks like there are only two choices. The arguer then eliminates one of the choices, so it seems that we are left with only one option: the one the arguer wanted us to pick in the first place.
• Example: "Caldwell Hall is in bad shape. Either
we tear it down and put up a new building, or we continue to risk students' safety. Obviously we shouldn't risk anyone's safety, so we must tear the building down." Begging the Question • Definition: A complicated fallacy, an argument that begs the question asks the reader to simply accept the conclusion without providing real evidence
• Examples: "Active euthanasia is morally
acceptable. It is a decent, ethical thing to help another human being escape suffering through death." Let's lay this out in premise-conclusion form: = Equivocation = • Definition: Equivocation is sliding between two or more different meanings of a single word or phrase that is important to the argument.
• Example: "Giving money to charity is the
right thing to do. So charities have a right to our money."