Table 5.7 Ultimate Shear Stress: 5.2.5 Span/effective Depth Ratios
Table 5.7 Ultimate Shear Stress: 5.2.5 Span/effective Depth Ratios
The shear is now checked on perimeter (c). If reinforcement is required then this is
provided between perimeter (a) and (c) in an analogous way to that used for the check on
the critical perimeter.
5.2.4.3 Openings
When openings in floors or roofs are required such openings should be trimmed where nec-
essary by special beams or reinforcement so that the designed strength of the surrounding
floor is not unduly impaired by the opening. Due regard should be paid to the possibility
of diagonal cracks developing at the corners of openings. The area of reinforcement inter-
rupted by such openings should be replaced by an equivalent amount, half of which should
be placed along each edge of the opening.
For flat slabs, openings in the column strips should be avoided.
(c) there are limitations on the depth of the neutral axis of the section depending on the
percentage of redistribution (see subclause 5.4.4.1), and
(d) the design moment for the columns should be the greater of the redistributed moment
or the elastic moment prior to redistribution.
A simple procedure may be adopted that will satisfy the above criteria:
5.4 Beams
5.4.1 Introduction
This subsection describes the final design of beams of normal proportions and spans. Deep
beams with a clear span less than twice the effective depth are not considered.
The general procedure to be adopted is as follows:
1. Check that the section complies with the requirements for fire resistance
2. Check that cover and concrete quality comply with durability requirements
3. Calculate bending moments and shear forces according to clause 5.4.3
4. Calculate reinforcement required for bending and shear
5. Check span/depth ratio.
The effective span of a simply supported beam should normally be taken as the clear
distance between the faces of supports plus one-third of their width. However, where a
bearing pad is provided between the slab and the support, the effective span should be
taken as the distance between the centres of the bearing pads.
The effective span of a beam continuous over its supports should normally be taken as
the distance between the centres of the supports.
The effective length of a cantilever beam where this forms the end of a continuous beam
is the length of the cantilever from the centre of the support. Where the beam is an isolat-
ed cantilever the effective length is is the length of the cantilever from the face of the sup-
port.
To prevent lateral buckling, the length of the compression flange measured between
adequate lateral restraints to the beam should not exceed 50b, where b is the width of the
compression flange, and the overall depth of the beam should not exceed 4b.
In normal slab-and-beam or framed construction specific calculations for torsion are not
usually necessary, torsional cracking being adequately controlled by shear reinforcement.
Where torsion is essential for the equilibrium of the structure, e.g. the arrangement of the
structure is such that loads are imposed mainly on one face of a beam without corre-
sponding rotational restraints being provided, EC2 should be consulted.
Where the cover to the outermost reinforcement exceeds 40mm special precautions against
spalling may be required, e.g. partial replacement by plaster, lightweight aggregate or the
use of fabric as supplementary reinforcement. For beams with sloping sides, the width in
Table 5.10 should be measured at the centroid of the tensile reinforcement. Table 5.10
applies to all beams that can be exposed to fire on three sides only, i.e. the upper side is
insulated by a slab.
5.4.2.2 Durability
The requirements for durability in any given environment are:
(a) an upper limit to the water/cement ratio
(b) a lower limit to the cement content
(c) a lower limit to the thickness of the cover to the reinforcement
(d) good compaction
(e) adequate curing, and
(f) good detailing.
Values for (a), (b) and (c) which, in combination, will give adequate durability are given
in Table 5.11 for various environments.
As (a) and (b) at present cannot be checked by methods that are practical for use during
construction, Table 5.11 gives, in addition, the characteristic strengths that have to be spec-
ified in the UK to ensure that requirements (a) and (b) are satisfied.
The concrete class strengths quoted in Table 5.11 will often require cement contents
that are higher than those given in the Table. The potential problems of increased
shrinkage arising from high cement and water contents should be considered in the
design.
For frost resistance the use of air entrainment of the concrete should be considered; how-
ever the effects of air entrainment on the concrete properties should be taken into account.
*Protective barrier to prevent direct contact with highly aggressive media should be provided.
†280kg/m3 for exposure classes 2b and 5a.
Rectangular beams
The procedure for the design of rectangular beams is as follows:
(a) Calculate Mu = Klim ƒckbd2 where Klim is obtained from Fig. 5.13 for the amount of
redistribution carried out.
(b) If M < Mu , the area of tension reinforcement As is calculated from:
As = M/(0.87fyk)z
(c) If M > Mu then compression reinforcement is needed. The area of compression rein-
forcement A's is calculated from:
A's = (M – Mu)/0.87fyk (d –d')
where d' is the depth to the centre of the compression reinforcement from the com
pression face.
If d' > (1–fyk/800)x, use 700 (l –d'/x) in lieu of 0.87fyk.
The area of tension reinforcement As is calculated from:
As = (Mu/0.87 fykz) + A's