2020 Yale Report
2020 Yale Report
Endowment
2020
Endowment Highlights
Fiscal Year
$30
$25
$20
Billions
$15
$10
$5
$0
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Fiscal Year
Contents
1. Introduction 2
2. The Yale Endowment 3
3. Investment Policy 5
4. Spending Policy 18
5. Investment Performance 20
6. Management and Oversight 22
The Humanities
Quadrangle
The Humanities Quadrangle at 320 York
Street (shown on the front cover) opened
recently after extensive rehabilitation, which
will make the former Hall of Graduate
Studies a focal point for study in the
humanities. Faculty, staff and students con-
nected to eighteen different humanities
units, once located at diverse campus loca-
tions, have occupied new, improved quar-
ters designed to enhance formal and infor-
mal interaction. Resident departments below the con-
include Comparative Literature, Film and course includes the
Media Studies, French, History, Judaic state-of-the-art
Studies, Spanish and Portuguese, in addi- Alice Cinema and a
tion to such units as the Whitney Lecture Hall
Humanities Center. for guest speaker
“The renovation of this building and programs.
inclusive work of its planning represents a The tower, a
significant institutional and human invest- distinctive feature
ment in the humanities at Yale,” said of the Humanities
Quadrangle since
its original opening
in 1932, is illustrat-
ed in the logo at
top left, designed
Kathryn Lofton, Faculty of Arts and by Kaleigh Kurpiewski. The tower has been
Sciences dean of humanities. Professor reconditioned, thanks to a gift from Lisbet
Christophe Schuwey of the French Rausing and Peter M. Baldwin ’78, and
Department called the new facility a “major renamed Swensen Tower in honor of David
commitment toward the humanities,” which Swensen ’80 PhD, ’14 LHD, Yale’s Chief
“will definitely foster conversation and col- Investment Officer since 1985 (in photo, far
laboration” among departments and indi- left). The commemorative plaque located
viduals. Doctoral candidates spoke enthusi- near the base of the tower on the ground
astically of the “thoughtful” and “function- floor was designed and created by 2010
al” nature of the design and layout as well as MacArthur Fellow Nick Benson, a stone
the equipping of spaces. carver from The John Stevens Shop whose
The Humanities Quadrangle offers work appears in other Yale locations. Shown
expanded office facilities, social areas and at center is the interior ground-floor gate-
classrooms, while the newly excavated level way, which dates to the original structure.
Introduction Yale’s Endowment generated a 6.8% return, net of fees, in fiscal 2020.
1
Over the past ten years, the Endowment grew from $16.7 billion to
$31.2 billion. With annual returns of 10.9% during the ten-year period,
the Endowment’s performance exceeded its benchmark and outpaced
institutional fund indices. For three of the past ten years, Yale’s ten-year
record ranked first in the Cambridge Associates universe.
Spending from the Endowment grew during the last decade from
$1.1 billion to $1.4 billion, an annual growth rate of 2.6%. Next year,
spending will amount to $1.5 billion, or 36% of projected revenues. Yale’s
spending and investment policies provide substantial levels of cash flow
to the operating budget for current scholars, while preserving Endow-
ment purchasing power for future generations.
Carrie A. Abildgaard
Director Endowment Growth Outpaces Inflation 1950–2020
$35
$30
$25
$20
Billions
$15
$10
$5
$0
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Fiscal Year
1950 Endowment Inflated Post-1950 Endowment Gifts Inflated Endowment Market Value
2
The Yale Endowment Totaling $31.2 billion on June 30, 2020, the Yale Endowment contains
thousands of funds with various purposes and restrictions. Approxi-
2
mately 82% of funds constitute true endowment, gifts restricted by
donors to provide long-term funding for designated purposes. The
remaining funds represent quasi-endowment, monies that the Yale
Corporation chooses to invest and treat as Endowment.
Donors frequently specify a particular purpose for gifts, creating
endowments to fund professorships, teaching and lectureships (24%),
scholarships, fellowships and prizes (18%), maintenance (4%), books
(3%) and miscellaneous specific purposes (27%). Twenty-four percent
of funds are unrestricted. Eighteen percent of the Endowment benefits
the overall university, with remaining funds focused on specific units,
including the Faculty of Arts & Sciences (34%), the professional and arts
schools (25%), the library (7%) and other entities (16%).
Although distinct in purpose or restriction, Endowment funds are
commingled in an investment pool and tracked with unit accounting
much like a large mutual fund. Endowment gifts of cash, securities or
property are valued and exchanged for units that represent a claim on a
portion of the total investment portfolio.
In fiscal 2020 the Endowment provided $1.4 billion, or 34%,
of the university’s $4.3 billion operating income. Other major sources of
revenues were medical services of $1.1 billion (27%), grants and contracts
of $837 million (20%), net tuition, room and board of $388 million
Alexander C. Banker (9%), gifts of $160 million (4%) and other income and transfers of $318
Director million (7%).*
Other Incomes
and Transfers
Books
Maintenance Gifts
Unrestricted Tuition,
Scholarships Room & Board Endowment
4
Investment Policy Yale’s portfolio is structured using a combination of academic theory and
informed market judgment. The theoretical framework relies on mean-
3
variance analysis, an approach developed by Nobel laureates James Tobin
and Harry Markowitz, both of whom conducted work on this important
portfolio management tool at Yale’s Cowles Foundation. Using statistical
techniques to combine expected returns, variances and covariances of
investment assets, Yale employs mean-variance analysis to estimate
expected risk and return profiles of various asset allocation alternatives
and to test sensitivity of results to changes in input assumptions.
Because investment management involves as much art as science,
qualitative considerations play an extremely important role in portfolio
decisions. The definition of an asset class is subjective, requiring precise
distinctions where none exist. Returns, risks and correlations are difficult
to forecast. Historical data provide a guide, but must be modified to
recognize structural changes and compensate for anomalous periods.
Quantitative measures have difficulty incorporating factors such as
market liquidity or the influence of significant, low-probability events.
In spite of the operational challenges, the rigor required in conducting
mean-variance analysis brings an important perspective to the asset
Amy M. Chivetta allocation process.
Director
The combination of quantitative analysis and market judgment
employed by Yale produces the following portfolio:
7
Asset Class Yale’s eight asset classes are defined by differences in their expected
response to economic conditions, such as economic growth, price
Characteristics inflation or changes in interest rates, with weights in the Endowment
portfolio determined by risk-adjusted returns and correlations. The uni-
versity combines the asset classes in such a way as to provide the highest
expected return for a given level of risk, subject to fundamental diversifi-
cation and liquidity constraints.
The capital markets assumptions detailed for each asset class
below incorporate assumptions about the university’s ability to add value
through active management.
Absolute Return In July 1990, Yale became the first institutional investor to define absolute
return strategies as a distinct asset class, beginning with a target alloca-
tion of 15.0%. Designed to provide significant diversification to the
Endowment, absolute return investments are expected to generate high
long-term real returns by exploiting market inefficiencies. The portfolio is
invested in two broad categories: event-driven strategies and value-driven
strategies. Event-driven strategies rely on a specific corporate event, such
as a merger, spin-off or bankruptcy restructuring, to achieve a target
price. Value-driven strategies involve hedged positions in assets or securi-
ties with prices that diverge from their underlying economic value. Today,
the absolute return portfolio is targeted to be 23.5% of the Endowment,
above the average educational institution’s allocation of 20.0% to such
strategies. Absolute return strategies are expected to generate a real return
of 3.5% with risk of 7.0%. The Barclays 9 to 12 Month Treasury Index
Matthew S.T. Mendelsohn ’07 serves as the portfolio benchmark.
Director Absolute return investments have historically provided returns
largely independent of overall market moves. Over the past twenty years,
the portfolio exceeded expectations, returning 8.1% per year with low cor-
relation to domestic stock and bond markets.
Domestic Equity Equity owners reasonably expect to receive returns superior to those pro-
duced by less risky assets such as bonds and cash. The predominant asset
class in most U.S. institutional portfolios, domestic equity represents a
large, liquid and heavily researched market. While the average education-
al institution invests 21.7% of assets in domestic equities, Yale’s target
allocation to this asset class is only 2.25%. The domestic equity portfolio
has an expected real return of 6.0% with a standard deviation of 17.0%.
The Wilshire 5000 Index serves as the portfolio benchmark.
Despite recognizing that the U.S. equity market is highly efficient,
Yale elects to pursue active management strategies, aspiring to outper-
form the market index by a few percentage points, net of fees, annually.
Because superior stock selection provides the most consistent and reliable
opportunity for generating attractive returns, the university favors man-
agers with exceptional bottom-up, fundamental research capabilities.
Yale’s domestic equity portfolio has posted returns of 9.7% per year over
the past twenty years.
Natural Resources Equity investments in natural resources—oil and gas, timberland and agri-
culture—share common risk and return characteristics: protection against
unanticipated inflation, high and visible current cash flow and opportuni-
ties to exploit inefficiencies. At the portfolio level, natural resource invest-
ments provide attractive return prospects and significant diversification.
Yale has a 4.5% policy allocation to natural resources with expected real
returns of 8.5% and risk of 24.0%. Yale’s policy allocation is below the
6.6% natural resources allocation of the average endowment.
Superior operators have demonstrated the ability to generate excess
returns through market cycles. Over the past twenty years, Yale’s natural
resources portfolio has generated an impressive 13.6% per annum.
Cash and Fixed Income Fixed income assets generate stable flows of income, providing more
certain nominal cash flow than any other Endowment asset class. The
fixed income portfolio exhibits a low covariance with other asset classes
and serves as a hedge against financial crises. While the typical education-
al institution’s allocation to fixed income and cash instruments is 12.2%,
Yale’s target allocation to fixed income and cash is 7.5%. Short-term
bonds have an expected real return of 0.0% with risk of 3.0%. The
Barclays Capital 6 to 12 Month U.S. Treasury Index serves as the
portfolio benchmark.
Yale is not particularly attracted to fixed income assets, as they
have the lowest expected returns of the eight asset classes that make up
the Endowment. In addition, the government bond market is the most
efficiently priced asset class, offering no opportunities to add significant
value through active management. Based on skepticism of active fixed
Celeste P. Benson income strategies and belief in the efficacy of a highly structured
Senior Portfolio Manager
approach to bond portfolio management, the Investments Office chooses
to manage Endowment bonds internally. Over the past twenty years, the
fixed income portfolio has generated returns of 3.7% per annum.
Michael Knight
Senior Business Associate
11
Investments Office Alumni
While Yale Investments Office alumni have pursued careers in fields ranging from investment management to business to govern-
ment to law, a significant number have gone on to serve in investment leadership positions at endowments or foundations.
Fourteen Investments Office alumni currently hold or have held the title of chief investment officer in the nonprofit world.
12
Donna Dean, Former Chief Andrew K. Golden, President, Randy Kim, Chief Investment
Investment Officer, Princeton University Officer, Rainwater Charitable
The Rockefeller Foundation Investment Company Foundation
“Working in the Yale Investments Office “I often describe my time at the YIO as being “I will forever be grateful to David, Dean
and learning the craft of investing from the equivalent of a medical internship and resi- and the rest of my former YIO colleagues for
David Swensen was the most formative dency—it had that much impact on my profes- ten years of invaluable investment training
experience of my career. Being at Yale made sional and, indeed, intellectual development.” and personal mentorship. I am blessed for
it clear to me that I wanted to invest on the opportunity to have made so many great
Andy Golden ’89 MPPM became the
behalf of a nonprofit with a mission of mak- friends, and I wish my colleagues at Yale
third president of the Princeton Univer-
ing the world a better place.” every future success.”
sity Investment Company (Princo) in
Donna Dean joined the Rockefeller January 1995. He came to Princo from Randy Kim ’98 BA, ’04 MBA became the
Foundation in 1995. She served as its Duke Management Company, where he first chief investment officer of the $1
chief investment officer from 2001 was an investment director. He previously billion Rainwater Charitable Foundation
through 2019. Prior to joining the worked as a senior associate in the Yale (RCF) in 2017. Established by legendary
Rockefeller Foundation, Donna spent Investments Office. Before shifting his investor Richard Rainwater in 1991, RCF
seven years at Yale University, where she focus to investing, Andy was a profession- funds research to accelerate treatments in
served as director of investments, with al photographer. a class of neurodegenerative diseases
responsibility for real estate as well as Andy earned the Chartered Financial called tauopathies. The foundation also
oversight of the New Haven Initiative Analyst designation and is a member of supports a variety of children’s educa-
community investment program. From the New York Society of Security Ana- tional programs. Prior to joining RCF,
1984 to 1987, she worked for CIGNA lysts. He served as a founding member of Randy spent eight years as chief invest-
Investments in Hartford, where she the Investors’ Committee of the Presi- ment officer of the Conrad N. Hilton
managed real estate portfolios in the dent’s Working Group on Financial Foundation, which funds nonprofit
southeastern United States. From 1978 Markets, and previously served as a mem- organizations working to improve the
to 1984, she was with International ber of the board of directors of the NAB lives of individuals living in poverty and
Paper Company in New York, where she Asset Corporation, a publicly traded com- experiencing disadvantage throughout
served as manager of trust investments mercial loan workout specialist. He is a the world. He previously worked for a
and oversaw the company’s pension and trustee of the Princeton Area Community decade at the Yale Investments Office,
employee benefit funds. Foundation, Rita Allen Foundation and focusing primarily on the domestic equi-
Donna is an independent trustee of Rutgers Preparatory School. ty, foreign equity, international private
Harbor Funds and serves on the invest- Andy holds a BA in Philosophy from equity and absolute return portfolios.
ment committee of Queens University Duke University and an MPPM from the Randy is the most devoted Notre
of Charlotte. Yale School of Management. Dame football fan in America, despite
Donna received a bachelor’s degree his lack of a Notre Dame degree.
from Queens University in Charlotte, Randy holds a BA from Yale
North Carolina, and an MBA from the University and an MBA from the Yale
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. School of Management.
13
of U.S. rowers for the highest levels of PhD from Yale’s Graduate School of Arts
international competition. Anne serves & Sciences.
on the investment committee for Smith
College and is an advisor to the David &
Lucile Packard Foundation investment
committee.
Anne is a cum laude graduate of
Smith College, Phi Beta Kappa, and holds
an MBA from Stanford Business School.
16
sets from the institutional world to
Truvvo’s clients. Prior to Truvvo, Casey
was the chief investment officer of The
New York Public Library. She joined the
Library as the first chief investment offi-
cer with a mandate to create the office of
investments. Her responsibilities includ-
ed asset allocation, manager selection and
overall management of the endowment,
which is invested across various tradi-
tional and alternative asset classes. Before
The New York Public Library, she was
director of public investments for The
Rockefeller University, focusing primarily
on global equities, hedge funds and fixed
income. She was heavily involved in asset
allocation, overall portfolio management
and the establishment of the university’s
Casey D. Whalen, Chief Executive real estate allocation. Casey began her Ana Yankova, Chief Investment
Officer and Chief Investment Officer, investment career at the Yale Investments Officer, Mount Holyoke College
Truvvo Partners Office working across various asset class- “Deeply committed to the university’s mission,
“My years at the Yale Investments Office es, including foreign equity, real estate David and Dean led a team that showed up
were extraordinarily impactful on my life. and fixed income. She went on to work every day to deliver excellence. Our Monday
David Swensen’s guidance as a mentor, for one of Yale’s real estate investment morning team meetings provided me with a
teacher and advocate laid the foundation for managers. front row seat at a master class in investing.
my career trajectory and, more importantly, Casey is a board member and treas- My biggest lesson from my time at Yale was
for my business ethics, critical thinking skills urer of the Yale Swimming and Diving that asking the right questions is as important
and intellectually honest approach to invest- Association, having been a member of as finding good answers.”
ing. I am so grateful for David’s professional the Yale Varsity Women’s Swimming
team. Casey is a CFA charterholder and In April 2020, Mount Holyoke College
support and friendship all these years, as named Ana Yankova its inaugural chief
well as the close relationships from our member of the New York Society of
Security Analysts. She serves on the investment officer. Before that, Ana was a
tight-knit group.” partner at global investment firm
investment committee of the Rockefeller
Casey Whalen ’96 founded Truvvo Family Fund. Casey is a member and Cambridge Associates. Previously, Ana
Partners, where she serves as the chief board member of the New York City was a senior financial analyst at the Yale
executive officer and chief investment chapter of GenNext. Investments Office and an associate
officer. She believes deeply in alignment Casey holds a BA from Yale analyst at the National Economic
with clients and investments, and in pro- University. Research Associates. She was born and
viding the benefits, resources and skill raised in Bulgaria.
Ana graduated from Mount Holyoke
College with a bachelor’s degree in
Economics and earned an MBA from the
MIT Sloan School of Management.
17
Spending Policy The spending rule is at the heart of fiscal discipline for an endowed
institution. Spending policies define an institution’s compromise between
4
the conflicting goals of providing support for current operations and
preserving purchasing power of Endowment assets. The spending rule
must be clearly defined and consistently applied for the concept of budget
balance to have meaning.
The Endowment spending policy, which allocates Endowment
earnings to operations, balances the competing objectives of providing a
stable flow of income to the operating budget and protecting the real
value of the Endowment. The spending policy manages the trade-off
between these two objectives by combining a long-term spending rate
target with a smoothing rule, which adjusts spending in any given year
gradually in response to changes in Endowment market value.
The target spending rate approved by the Yale Corporation cur-
rently stands at 5.25%. According to the smoothing rule, Endowment
spending in a given year sums to 80% of the previous year’s spending and
20% of the targeted long-term spending rate applied to the market value
at the start of the prior year. The spending amount determined by the
formula is adjusted for inflation and taxes, subject to the constraint that
A recent exhibition at the Beinecke Library highlighted photographs by Carl Van Vechten (1880-1964) of such figures as Billie Holiday, Paul Robeson
and (at far right, a photograph dated 1940) author Zora Neale Hurston
18
the calculated rate is at least 4.0% and not more than 6.5% of the
Endowment’s inflation-adjusted market value at the start of the prior year.
The smoothing rule and the diversified nature of the Endowment are
designed to mitigate the impact of short-term market volatility on the flow
of funds to support Yale’s operations.
The spending rule has two implications. First, by incorporating the
prior year’s spending, the rule eliminates large fluctuations, enabling the
university to plan for its operating budget needs. Over the last twenty years,
the standard deviation of annual changes in actual spending has been
approximately 85% of the standard deviation of Endowment returns.
Bertan Akin
Senior Performance Manager Second, by adjusting spending toward the long-term target spending level,
the rule ensures that spending will be sensitive to fluctuating Endowment
market values, providing stability in long-term purchasing power.
Distributions to the operating budget rose from $1.1 billion in fiscal
2010 to $1.4 billion in fiscal 2020. The university projects spending of $1.5
billion from the Endowment in fiscal 2021, representing approximately 36%
of revenues.
$1,400
$1,200
$1,000
Millions
$800
$600
$400
$200
$0
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Fiscal Year
1950 Spending Inflated Spending from Post-1950 Endowment Gifts Inflated Actual Spending
19
Investment Performance Yale has produced excellent long-term investment returns. Over the
ten-year period ending June 30, 2020, the Endowment earned an annual-
5
ized 10.9% return, net of fees, placing Yale in the top 2% of colleges and
universities. Over the same period, domestic stocks returned 13.7% and
domestic bonds returned 3.8%. Endowment outperformance stems from
sound asset allocation policy and superior active management.
Yale’s long-term superior performance relative to its peers and
benchmarks creates substantial wealth for the university. Over the ten
years ending June 30, 2020, Yale added $9.5 billion relative to the average
return of a broad universe of college and university endowments and
$10.3 billion relative to its passive benchmark.
20%
5%
0%
-5%
-10%
Absolute Domestic Foreign Leveraged Natural Real Estate* Venture Short-term
Return Equity Equity Buyouts* Resources* Capital* Fixed Income
6
ment experience into portfolio policy formulation. The Investment
Committee consists of at least three Fellows of the Corporation and other
persons who have particular investment expertise. The Committee meets
quarterly, at which time members review asset allocation policies,
Endowment performance and strategies proposed by Investments Office
staff. The Committee approves guidelines for investment of the
Endowment portfolio, specifying investment objectives, spending policy
and approaches for the investment of each asset category.
Investments Office David F. Swensen ’80 PhD, ’14 LHD Daniel J. Otto ’12
Chief Investment Officer Associate Director
Sources
Financial and Investment Information
Educational institution asset allocations and returns from Cambridge Associates.
Much of the material in this publication is drawn from memoranda produced by
the Investments Office for the Yale Corporation Investment Committee. Other
material comes from Yale’s financial records, Reports of the Treasurer, and Reports
of the President.
Photo Sources
Portraits of alumni were provided by the individuals shown.
Yale Investments Office staff photos by Mara Lavitt.
Page 1, Swensen Tower logo by Kaleigh Kurpiewski.
Page 1, Swensen Tower plaque and gate photos by Taylor Yovino.
Page 1, David Swensen photo by Michael Marsland, Office of Public Affairs
and Communications.
Inside back cover, bulldog photo by Dan Renzetti.
Front and back covers and all other photos by Tom Strong.
Design
Strong Cohen, llc / Margaret Watkins
Front cover:
Humanities Quadrangle, 320 York Street. See commentary, page 1.
Yale President Peter Salovey ’86 PhD with young Kingman, who will
Back cover: reign as Handsome Dan XIX. He was named for Kingman Brewster,
Nine stained-glass windows, created in about 1930, selected from approxi- Jr., President of Yale University from 1963 to 1977, a historic period
mately fifty similar windows in the student lounge on the ground floor of which included the change to coeducation and the introduction of
the renovated Humanities Quadrangle. need-blind admissions in Yale College.