Comparison of GBAnd International Standards For Electric Vehicle Secondary Batteries
Comparison of GBAnd International Standards For Electric Vehicle Secondary Batteries
Technical Report
Comparison of GB and International Standards for
Electric vehicle secondary batteries
Cells and Modules (Part 1)
Hitoshi Abe, Takashi Kajihara, and Yang Hao, Test Consulting Department, ESPEC CORP.
Abstract
In Test Navi Report No. 121, we introduced the Standards System and Conformity Assessment
System in China. Based on the information in that publication, this report focuses on six GB
standards promulgated in 2015 for in-vehicle secondary batteries by using the operational status
and typical cases of China’s secondary battery conformity assessment system to explain the scope
of related GB standards, the inspection items, the test methods, and the criteria. This report also
compares these GB standards with IEC 62660 series standards and ISO 12405 series standards
and explains the common points and differences with the international standards by using concrete
examples. This report is the first part of a two-part series. (Table 1)
GB/T 31484 Cycle life requirements and test methods for traction battery of electric vehicle
GB/T 31485 Safety requirements and test methods for traction battery of electric vehicle
GB/T 31486 Electrical performance requirements and test methods for traction battery of electric vehicle
Lithium-ion traction battery pack and system for electric vehicles — Part 1: Test specification for high
GB/T 31467.1 power applications
GB/T 31467.2 Lithium-ion traction battery pack and system for electric vehicles — Part 2: Test specification for high
energy applications
GB/T 31467.3 Lithium-ion traction battery pack and system for electric vehicles — Part 3: Safety requirements and test
methods
IEC 62660-1 Secondary lithium-ion cells for the propulsion of electric road vehicles - Part 1: Performance testing
IEC 62660-2 Secondary lithium-ion cells for the propulsion of electric road vehicles - Part 2: Reliability and abuse
testing
IEC 62660-3 Secondary lithium-ion cells for the propulsion of electric road vehicles - Part 3: Safety requirements
ISO 12405-1 Electrically propelled road vehicles — Test specification for lithium-ion traction battery packs and
systems — Part 1: High-power applications
ISO 12405-2 Electrically propelled road vehicles — Test specification for lithium-ion traction battery packs and
systems — Part 2: High-energy applications
ISO 12405-3 Electrically propelled road vehicles — Test specification for lithium-ion traction battery packs and
systems — Part 3: Safety performance requirements
1
For more information, refer to Test Navi No. 121, “The Standards System and Conformity
Assessment System in China”.
Test Navi Report No. 36 (Vol. 124) 2020 4
ESPEC Technical Information
Fig. 1 — Certification Standards for Electric Vehicle Secondary Battery Products (Shaded in
Green)
2. Comparison of GB Standards and IEC 62660 Series Standards for Cells and Modules
2.1 Overview of Comparison
Table 3 shows an overview of the comparison between GB standards and IEC standards for
electric vehicle secondary battery cells and modules.
Table 3 — Overview of Comparison between GB Standards and IEC Standards for Electric
Vehicle Secondary Battery Cells and Modules
Item GB/T 31484, 31485, 31486 IEC 62660-1, -2, -3
Formulated based on the Chinese
Formulated based on Japan's
automobile industry standard QC/T
strong proposal for cell
Referenced 743 and intended to verify
manufacturing, and support
standards performance, life, and safety in
Overview various pack designs. Intended to
Test targets terms of transportation and use.
verify performance, life, and safety
Main features Applicable to all batteries with
in terms of development and
coverage for cells, modules, and
manufacturing.
systems at the product level.
Charge Discharge current: 1/3 It (BEV),
Discharge current: 1 It
preparation 1 It (HEV)
Capacity Test temperature: 25°C,
Test temperature: 0°C, 25°C, 45°C
measurement Number of cycles: 5
General BEV: Inl (A) = (100 - n) / 100 × 3 h,
SOC Inl (A) = (100 - n) / 100 × 1 h, n =
conditions HEV: Inl (A) = (100 - n) / 100 × 1 h,
adjustment SOC (%)
n = SOC (%)
Test temperature: -20°C, 0°C,
Power Test temperature: 25°C,
25°C, 40°C,
measurement SOC adjustment: 50%
SOC adjustment: 20%, 50%, 80%
Discharge Test temperature: -20°C, 25°C, Test temperature: -20°C, 25°C,
capacity 55°C (Single-cycle operation) 45°C (Continuous operation)
Performance Charge current: 2 It, SOC up to
C-rate charge Charge current: 2 It
test 80%
C-rate Discharge current: 3 It (BEV),
No applicable test
discharge 8 It (HEV)
Test temperature: 25°C, Test temperature: 45°C,
Cycle life
Test pattern: GB Test pattern: IEC
Test temperature: 25°C, 45°C
Charge
No applicable test SOC adjustment/test time: 50% /
retention
Ageing test 28 days
SOC: 50% (HEV), SOC: 100%
SOC: 100%
(BEV)
Storage Test temperature/test time:
Test temperature: 45°C,
25°C / 28 days, 55°C / 7 days
Test time: 3 cycles × 42 days
Low atmospheric pressure, No low atmospheric pressure,
Environmental
seawater immersion no seawater immersion
Sine sweep vibration, free fall, no Random vibration, no drop,
Mechanical
impact Mechanical shock
Safety and
Over-discharge: No SOC Over-discharge: SOC adjustment
abuse test Electrical
adjustment required (0%)
Internal short-circuit, nail (ceramic
Internal short-
Nail (steel nail) penetration nail) penetration alternative
circuit
method
Performance
Acquisition test No clear criteria, manufacturer
Clear criteria
criteria specification conformity
Life test
For performance tests, the GB standards adopt evaluation at different discharge currents for
BEV and HEV, and the conditions are set according to the actual usage environment. Also, for C-
rate discharge tests for confirming rapid discharge performance, the IEC standards have no
corresponding test, and the emphasis is clearly placed on evaluation assuming the actual usage
environment. Finally, for safety tests, to verify the safety for transportation and use, inspection
items not included in the IEC standards—such as low atmospheric pressure tests, seawater
immersion tests, and nail (steel nail) penetration tests—are also included.
Overall, the GB standard test conditions are stricter than the IEC standard test conditions in
some cases, so special caution is necessary when developing and evaluating products for the
Chinese market. On the other hand, the GB standards have been adopted as a mandatory
certification standard for secondary battery products, as mentioned above, so the test results
criteria are clear. This is very convenient when conducting preliminary tests and performing
preliminary verification.
When comparing the conditions, we can see, for example, that the operating cycle life tests for
passenger BEVs in Section 6.5.3 of GB/T 31484 correspond to Section 7.8.2 of IEC 62660-1. Both
tests use cycles in which the charge/discharge rectangular wave profile shifts to the discharge
side after charging as specified by the manufacturer is repeated up to the specified SOC. However,
the GB/T test is for current control, while the IEC test is for power control. Two profiles are used
in the IEC test, Profile A and Profile B, which are considered simple simulations of assist load
fluctuations and regenerative charging during driving,
while the GB/T test has a simpler profile. The fact that
GB/T test is not as detailed as the IEC test suggests that
GB/T has a background of mandatory certification, and
that the purpose was to make it a condition in order to
ascertain certain aspects. As for the impact of the test
contents, capacity reductions were reported as more
likely to occur in GB/T tests than IEC tests when 45°C is
Fig. 2 — Cycle Life Test Using Secondary Battery
set as the temperature conditions6. Charge/Discharge Evaluation System
caused by compressing a cell with a piece of nickel inserted to represent foreign matter. Because
the IEC test is incredibly difficult to perform due to the need to disassemble the cell, and because
worker safety is also a concern, the method of using a ceramic nail with a nickel tip as a substitute
is summarized in the Technical Reports of IEC 62660-4. Moreover, for situations with more than
one cell block, the heat chain test can also be used as an alternative.
*The new GB 38031-2020 standard, “Electric vehicles secondary battery safety requirements,”
which replaces GB/T 31485 and GB/T 31467.3 by integrating the two was promulgated on May 12,
2020. In this standard, which will be enforced from January 1, 2021, but is officially required instead
of GB/T, the above-mentioned nail penetration test was removed due to how unusual such events
are occurred in actual usage. On the other hand, a thermal diffusion test was newly added for
safety verification in the event of a battery pack or single cell thermal runway occurred.
3. Conclusion
After comparing the general outline of the test contents and the specific test conditions, we can
see that the GB standards for Chinese-market electric vehicle secondary batteries —in terms of
the basic ideas for performance tests, ageing tests, and safety and abuse tests of cells and
modules—are not significantly different from the IEC standards. However, while the principle and
purpose of establishing the GB standards are to determine the performance and quality of products,
the emphasis is on safety evaluation for use and transportation. The IEC standards, on the other
hand, define the setting of test conditions and the configuration of test contents for verifying
manufacturing quality. Therefore, the GB standards could be considered more applicable for
practical use in the Chinese market.
ESPEC’s Battery Safety Testing Center provides one-stop battery testing/certification services
under UN ECE R100-02, Part.II, as well as compliance with GB, IEC, ISO, and other international
standards for the maintenance and expansion of electric vehicle secondary batteries. The
mandatory GB standards (including GB 38031) introduced here are scheduled to be enforced from
January 2021. As such, ESPEC is making various efforts regarding test methods with particular
attention to the newly added thermal diffusion test. The company is currently dedicated to building
a test design capable of putting these new standards into practice.
*Feel free to contact ESPEC with any general questions or concerns regarding GB standard tests.
https://www.espec.co.jp/english/inquiry/trustee.php
References:
1) “Normative Conditions for the Lithium-Ion Battery Industry”, Ministry of Industry and Information
Technology of the People's Republic of China (MIIT), 2015
2) “New Energy Vehicle (NEV) Manufacturing Companies and Product Introduction Management
Regulations”, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China
(MIIT), 2019
3) Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China (SAC), Publication 2017, No.
14
4) Related GB standards: GB/T 31484-2015, GB/T 31485-2015, GB/T 31486-20155, GB 38031-
2020
5) Related IEC standards: IEC 62660-1:2018, IEC 62660-2:2018, IEC 62660-3:2016
6) “The Influence of Differences in Discharge Profile of Cycle Life Tests on Performance Changes
of Lithium-Ion Batteries for EV”, JARI Research Journal 20170801