PFM Chapter 2
PFM Chapter 2
CHAPTER TWO
PROJECT IDENTIFICATIONS and FORMATION
INTRODUCTION Page | 1
Project identification is the first phase in the project life-cycle – which is finding out of a business
or investment opportunity. That is project is conceived out of problems and/or opportunities. This
phase is an innovation process and it involves identifying a deliverable to be produced and the
benefits expected from the deliverable. The process in project identification includes collection,
compilation and analysis of economic data for the purpose of locating the possible opportunities
for investment. Identification of such opportunities requires imagination, sensitivity to
environmental changes, and realistic assessment of what the firm can do. The task is partly
structured, partly unstructured, partly dependent on convergent thinking, partly dependent on
divergent thinking, partly requiring objective analysis of quantifiable factors, and partly requiring
subjective evaluation of qualitative factors, partly amenable to control, partly dependent on
fortuitous circumstances. Identification is often the outcomes of a triggering process rather than
an analytical exercise.
lower cost by single manufacturers who can enjoy economies of scale. Similarly a study
of the output of the existing industries may reveal opportunities for adding value
through further processing of the main outputs, by products as well as waste products.
III. Screening
At identification stage an initial screening of project idea will take place, with some
projects ideas being abandoned as impractical or of a low propriety. This is done to
assess:
Page | 6
• Whether the project is prima facie worthwhile to justify a feasibility study, and
• What aspects of the project are critical to its viability and hence warrant an in –
depth investigation.
For this purpose, the following factors should be considered:
Compatibility with the promoter: The ideas must be compatible with the interest,
personality, and resources of entrepreneur.
Consistency with government Proprieties: The project idea must be feasible given the
national goals and governmental regulatory framework. The questions raised in this
context are; is the project consistent with national goals and priorities, are there any
environmental effects contrary to government regulations, can the foreign exchange
requirements of the project be easily accomplished, will there be any difficulty in
obtaining the license for the project, and so on.
Availability of Inputs: The resources and inputs required for the project must be
reasonably assured. To assess this, it important to answer question such as; are the
capital requirements of the project within manageable limits, can the technical know-
how required for the project be obtained, are the raw materials required for the project
available domestically at a reasonable cost, if the raw materials required to be imported
will there a problem, etc.
Adequacy of the Market: The size of the present market must offer the prospect of
adequate sales volume. Further, there should be a potential for growth and reasonable
return on investment. To judge the adequacy of the market the following factors have
to be examined.
▪ Total present domestic market
▪ Competitors and their market share
▪ Export market
▪ Qualify – price profile of the product vis-à-vis competitive products.
▪ Sales and distribution system
▪ Projected increase in consumption
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
Finally based on the above assessment, the analyst should eliminate project
proposals that:
• Are technically unsound and risky
• Have no market for the output
• Have inadequate supply of inputs
• Are very costly in relation to benefits
• Assume over ambitious sales and profitability, etc.
As a result, some of the project alternatives will be rejected and those are promising
will be advanced to the next stage called project preparation.
The limited resources available mean that effective project identification and selection at various
levels will be essential. There will be more ideas for potential projects than resources available.
Potential criteria for ranking projects are given below.
Examples of Criteria for Ranking Project
Page | 8
Extent
• Number of people and Geographic area affected by the project- More people affected
means the project will be given more weight
Economic and Financial
• Potential financial and economic benefits to the country or region and individuals.
Environmental; Impact of the project on
• Conservation of natural resources and more sustainable land use
• Protection of natural resources (e.g., forests)
Social;
• Contribution of the project to Poverty alleviation and Assistance to disadvantage groups
Policy is the project in line with national policies
Resources;
Availability of human resources to implement project
• Likely availability of funding from government, etc
Success or Failures;
• What is the chance of the project successfully meeting its objectives? What degrees of the
risks are associated with the project that may affect its implementation?
Support
• Political support for project
• Community support and demand for project.
During selection process, each project can be assessed against each of the criteria to give a rating.
At this stage of the project cycle this more likely to be qualitative than quantitative. Certain criteria
can be given greater weighting to reflect the importance of the criteria in determining the overall
rank of the project.
into a project rating index. The steps involved in determining the project rating index are as
follows:
1. Identify factors relevant for project rating
2. Assign weights to these factors (the weights are supposed to reflect their relative
Page | 9
importance).
3. Rate the project proposal on various factors, using a suitable rating scale (Typically a 5 –
point scale or a 7 – point scale is used for this purpose.)
4. For each factor multiply the factor rating with the factor weight to get the factor score.
5. Add all the factor scores to get the overall project rating index.
The following table illustrates the determination of the project rating index. Once the project rating
index is determined, it is compared with a pre – determined hurdle value to judge whether the
project is prima facie worthwhile or not.
Construction of a Rating Index
Factors Factor Rating (Step 3 &4) Factor
(Step 1 Weight VG G A P VP Score
(Step) 5 4 3 2 1 (Step 5)
Input availability 0.25 0.75
Technical Know-how 0.10 0.40
Reasonableness of cost 0.05 0.20
Adequacy of market 0.15 0.75
Complementary relationship
With other products 0.15 0.20
Stability 0.10 0.40
Dependence on firm’s
Strength 0.20 1.00
Consistency with
Governmental priorities 0.10 0.30
1.00 Rating Index 4.00