0% found this document useful (0 votes)
78 views

Using Deep Learning For Predictive Maintenance Slides

The document discusses how predictive maintenance uses deep learning models trained on sensor and operational data to predict failures in industrial equipment, highlighting approaches like classification and regression to determine remaining useful life, examples of real-world predictive maintenance problems, and considerations for whether to perform deep learning training and inference at the cloud or edge level.

Uploaded by

RiDhA HeZlOuN
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
78 views

Using Deep Learning For Predictive Maintenance Slides

The document discusses how predictive maintenance uses deep learning models trained on sensor and operational data to predict failures in industrial equipment, highlighting approaches like classification and regression to determine remaining useful life, examples of real-world predictive maintenance problems, and considerations for whether to perform deep learning training and inference at the cloud or edge level.

Uploaded by

RiDhA HeZlOuN
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

Using Deep Learning for Predictive

Maintenance

1
Evolution of maintenance

Manual inspection with preventive


Fix when equipment is down. maintenance. Replace parts on
when showing signs of failure.

Preventive Predictive

Reactive Condition
Monitoring
Use analytics to predict
Scheduled maintenance failures.
Condition-based

2
Industry 4.0 and predictive maintenance
Predictive maintenance employs advanced analytics on the machine data collected from end sensor nodes to
draw meaning insight to predict machine failures.
Sense Compute Act

Predict Remaining Useful Life / Time to Failure


Oil
Ther Vibr
mal ation

PdM Ultra
‒ Event Generation
Sou
nd
soni • AD
c
Curr • RUL
Mag
sensor signals netic
ent/
Volta
Information • W&T
field
• Reuse existing
ge ‒ Work order
sensors ‒ Notification
• Add new sensors ‒ Visualization
• Control inputs
Sensors and actuators

Maintenance

3
Why predictive maintenance?
Lower maintenance
costs

Extended
Recover lost
equipment life
revenue

Predictive
Maintenance

Lower risk Reduced


exposure downtime

Improved
production

4
Examples from real-life scenarios
• Find defective bearings long before defects are visually seen.
• Find misalignment between two rotating pieces of equipment.
• Recognize when fans become unbalanced.
• Identify when bearings need lubrication.
• Report when an electrical connection needs to be tightened.
• Alert when oil is contaminated or in need of replacement.

5
Predictive maintenance problems
• Will this equipment fail in a given period of time (next 7 days, next 1 month,
etc.): Yes or no?
• What is the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) or the Time to First Failure (TFF)?
• How to quantify wear and tear (of expandable components)?
– Subset of RUL, focused on shorter-leaving subsystems
• Is there an anomaly in equipment behavior?
– Further analysis may provide failure classification.
• How best to optimize equipment settings?

6
Predictive maintenance approaches
• Problem definition: Classification or regression approach
– Classification: Will it fail?
Multi-class classification: Will it fail for reason X?
– Regression: After how long will it fail?
Classification Regression
• Methods:
– Traditional machine learning:
• Decision trees: Random forests, gradient boosting trees, isolation forest
• SVM (Support Vector Machines)
– Deep learning approach:
• CNN (Convolution Neural Network)
• RNN (Recurrent Neural Network)/LGTM (Long Short Term Memory)/GRU (Gated Recurrent Unit)
– Hybrid of deep learning and Physics-Based Modeling (PBM):
• Use PBM to generate training data where lacking
• Use PBM to reduce the problem space (feature engineering)
• Use PBM to inform and validate DL models (e.g., to identify catastrophic failures, most notably in
scenarios with low amounts of training data and a high degree of mission criticality)

7
When to use deep learning to predict failures
• Is accuracy of prediction more important than interpretability?
• Are there frequent changes in asset configurations / operational conditions?
• Are traditional approaches costly?
• Do you have access to a dataset that covers all kinds of events needed to
discriminate?
– Access to ample baseline data:
• Dataset is relevant to “normal” asset behavior, the more the better
• Big enough to ensure good statistics
– For RUL/TTF scenarios, lots of baseline data eventually leading to failure
– Access to failure history
– Labeled, for supervised learning only
– Up-to-date so that it covers any new events or behaviors
– Access to maintenance and repair history

8
Deep learning algorithm development flow
Two-step process: Training and inference

9
Comparing training approaches for deep learning-
based predictive maintenance models
• Deep learning model training can be done offline, online or as a hybrid approach:
– Offline training: Training is done on the static dataset.
– Online training: Training is done as the data comes in.
• Offline training approach:
– Complete dataset, fully determining system behavior is available
– Similar deployment environment
– Approximately static behavior
– Same across all product instances (all product features perfectly aligned – no tuning required)
• Online training approach:
– Datasets are not available and connectivity is either not enabled or narrow band:
• System model identification is done at the edge, and prediction deviation used as outlier indicator.
• Anomalies / faults are detected as outliers using unsupervised learning.

• Hybrid training approach:


– Create initial model using offline training.
– Adapt (transfer learning) using online training at the edge to take care of environment differences, and/or individual
setup differences.

10
Deep learning inference: Cloud versus edge
Processing on the cloud
Cloud vs edge processing
concerns

Data uploaded to cloud


Prediction result
returned
Data transmission
The Cloud cost

Machine learning inference Action Network bandwidth


Sensor data

Inference on the cloud


Network latency

Local hardware
Network connectivity

Security

Sensor data Machine learning inference Action


Reliability
Inference at the edge

System power
For more information
• Sitara Processors Product Overview: http://www.ti.com/sitara
• Introduction to Deep Learning: https://training.ti.com/introduction-deep-learning
• WEBINAR: Why predictive maintenance is fundamental in Industry 4.0:
https://training.ti.com/webinar-why-predictive-maintenance-fundamental-industry-40-0
• Texas Instruments Deep Learning (TIDL) Overview:
https://training.ti.com/texas-instruments-deep-learning-tidl-overview
• Predictive maintenance of smart meters:
https://training.ti.com/predictive-maintenance-smart-meters
• Predictive maintenance with robust IEPE vibration sensing over IO-Link interface:
https://training.ti.com/predictive-maintenance-robust-iepe-vibration-sensing-over-io-link-
interface
• For questions about this training, refer to the E2E Community Forums for Sitara
Processors at http://e2e.ti.com

You might also like