Rayat Shikshan Sanstha’s

Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Polytechnic, Satara

Micro-Project Report
On
“COVALENT BOND”
Presented By
Roll No Name of Student
278 MULLA SHABBIR JAHANGIR

279 NALE SHIVENDRA ANNASAHEB

282 NIKAM SHREYASH DIPAK

283 NIKAT SHIVAM REVANATH

286 PARDESHI CHINMAY RAHUL

Program: Diploma in Computer Engineering

Class: 1stYear ( Semester 1st)
Course: CHEMISTRY( Subject Code: )

Guided By
Prof. JADHAV.V.V

COMPUTER Engineering Department

[2022-23]
 Rayat Shikshan Sanstha’s

Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Polytechnic, Satara

CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that
Mr . MULLA SHABBIR JAHANGIR
Mr. NALE SHIVENDRA ANNASAHEB
Mr. NIKAM SHREYASH DIPAK
Mr. NIKAT SHIVAM REVANATH
Mr. PARDESHI CHINMAY RAHUL

Of 1ST Year ( Semester 1ST ) have successfully completed the Micro-Project work

entitled “ COVALENT BOND ” in the Course

of Program Diploma in COMPUTER Engineering of

Maharashtra State of Technical Education, Mumbai, Maharashtra State.

Prof. JADHAV.V.V Prof. Palekar A.P. Prin Dr.Shaikh K.C.

Guide Head of Department Principal

Date:
Place:
 Undertaking by Students
We will preserve micro-project and the report in our custody till end of completion
of our program. We assure that we will produce the same whenever we or anybody from
our group will be asked to produce it without fail.

Sr. Roll Name of Student Mobile No. Signature

No. No.
1 278 MULLA SHABBIR JAHANGIR 9420761015
2 279 NALE SHIVENDRA ANNASAHEB 9322851979
3 282 NIKAM SHREYASH DIPAK 9322693795
4 283 NIKAT SHIVAM REVANATH 7387446494
5 286 PARDESHI CHINMAY RAHUL 7720058397
 Annexure – I A

Part A – Plan (About 2-3 pages)

Format for Micro-Project Proposal (For 1st to 4th Semester)
Title of Micro-Project COVALENT BOND

1.0 Brief Introduction: ( Importance of the project, in about 4 to 5 sentences )

2.0 Aim of the Micro-Project (in about 4 to 5 sentences )

This Micro-Project aims at

b
c
d
3.0 Action Plan ( Sequence and time required for major activities for 8 weeks )

Sr. Planned Planned Name of Responsible

Details of Activity
No. Start date Finish date Team Members
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4.0 Resources Requires ( Major resources such as raw materials, some machining facility, software etc )

Sr.
Name of resource / material Specification Quantity Remarks
No.
1
2
3

*********
 Annexure – II A

Part B – Outcome after Execution

Format for Micro-Project Report ( About 6-10 pages )

For 1st to 4th Semester

Title of Micro-Project

1.0 Brief Description: ( Importance of the project, in about 100 to 200 words )

2.0 Aim of the Micro-Project ( in about 100 to 200 words )

This Micro-Project aims at

3.0 Course Outcome Integrated

( Add to the earlier list if more COs are addressed )

4.0 Actual Procedure Followed

Write the step wise the work was done, including which team member did what work and how the
data was analysed. (if any)
 Actual Resources Used
( Mention the actual resources used )

Sr.
Name of resource / material Specification Quantity Remarks
No.
1
2
3

5.0 Output of the Micro-Project

(Drawing of the prototype, drawing of survey, presentation of collection of data, findings etc)

6.0 Skill developed / Learning out of the Micro-Project

(in about 150 to 200 words)

*********
 Annexure – III

Teacher Evaluation Sheet

Name of Student: Enrollment No.:

Name of Program : Semester:

Course Title: Code:

Title of the Micro-Project:

Course Outcomes Achieved:

Evaluation as per suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

(Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)

Sr. Characteristic to be Poor Average Good Excellent

No. assessed ( Marks 1 -3 ) ( Marks 4 -5 ) ( Marks 6 -8 ) ( Marks 9 -10)
1 Relevance to the course
2 Literature survey /
Information collected
3 Project Proposal
4 Completion of target as
per project proposal
5 Analysis of data and
representation
6 Quality of prototype /
Model
7 Report Preparation
8 Presentation
9 Defense
 Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet

Process assessment Product assessment

Part B Individual Total Marks
Part A Project
Project Report / Presentation /
Project Proposal Methodology
Working Model Viva 10
( 2 marks ) ( 2 marks )
( 2 marks ) ( 4 marks)

Note: Every course teacher is expected to assign marks for group evolution in first 3 columns and
individual evolution in 4th column for each group of students as per suggested rubrics.

Comments / suggestion about team work / leadership / inter-personal communication (if any):

Any other Comment:

Name and designation of faculty member:

Signature:
Guidelines for report:

1) Paper Size: A4
2) Font name: Calibri
3) Font size: 12 points (excluding cover page and initial pages)
4) Margins (Top, Bottom, Left, Right) : 2.5 cm
5) Line spacing: 1.2
6) Black and White printing (No colour printing)
 Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project
Sr. Characteristic to be Poor Average Good Excellent
No. assessed ( Marks 1 -3 ) ( Marks 4 -5 ) ( Marks 6 -8 ) ( Marks 9 -10)
1 Relevance to the course Relate to very Relate to very Take care of Take care of
few LOs few LOs at-least one CO more than one
CO
2 Literature survey / Not more than At-least 5 At-least 7 At-least 10
Information collected two sources relevant relevant relevant
(primary and sources, at sources, most sources, most
secondary), least 2 latest. latest. latest.
very old
reference
3 Project Proposal Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent
4 Completion of target as Completed less Completed n Completed n Completed
per project proposal than 50% 50 to 60% 60 to 80% more than 80%
5 Analysis of data and Sample size Sufficient and Sufficient and Enough data
representation small, data appropriate appropriate collected by
neither sample, sample, sufficient and
organised nor enough data enough data appropriate
presented generated but generated sample size.
well. not organised which is Proper
and not well organised but inferences
present. poor drawn by
inferences organising and
drawn. presenting
data through
tables, charts
and graphs.
6 Quality of prototype / Incomplete Just assembled Well Well
Model fabrication / / fabricated assembled / assembled /
assembly. and parts are fabricated with fabricated with
not functioning proper proper
well. Not in functioning functioning
proper shape, parts. In parts. In
dimensions proper shape, proper shape,
beyond within within
tolerance limit. tolerance tolerance
Appearance / dimensions dimensions
finish is and good finish and good finish
shabby. / appearance. / appearance.
But no Creativity in
creativity in design and use
design and use of material.
of material.
7 Report Preparation Very short, Nearly Detailed Very detailed
poor quality sufficient and correct and correct, clear
correct details clear description of
about description of methods,
methods, methods, materials,
materials, materials, precautions.
precautions precautions. and
and and conclusion,
conclusion, but conclusion, Enough tables,
clarity is not Sufficient charts and
there in graphic sketches.
presentation. description.
But not
enough
graphic
description.
8 Presentation Major Includes major Includes major Well organized
information is information information includes major
not included, but not well and well information,
information is organized and organized but well
not well presented not presented presented.
organized. well. well.
9 Defense Could not reply Replied to Replied Replied most
to considerable properly to of the
considerable number of considerable questions
number of questions but number of properly.
question. not very questions.
properly.