Wind Turbine
Wind Turbine
Small wind turbines are typically used for the remote or rural
areas of the world including: a village in Chile; a cabin dweller in
the U.S.; a farmer who wants to water his crop; or a utility
company that wants to use distributed generation to help defer
building new transmission lines and distribution facilities. Small
wind turbines can be used for powering communities, businesses,
homes, and miscellaneous equipment to support unattended
operation. This paper covers the U.S. Department of
Energy/National Renewable Energy Laboratory Small Wind
Turbine project, its specifications, its applications, the
subcontractors and their small wind turbine concepts.
International Markets
SPECIFICATIONS
Specifications listed in the Request for Proposal (RFP) include: 5-40 kW maximum power; high reliability; low
maintenance; ease of installation and transportation; identification of extreme environmental considerations (coastal,
desert, cold weather); a cost performance ratio- turbine system cost/net annual energy production (AEPn.J of
$0.60/k:Wh (5.4 m/s); use IEC class II guidelines.(resource of 8.5 m/s, wind gust for 100 year of 132 mph) for analysis
and design; and a COE that will be reduced by year 2000.
Specific explanation of the market drivers for each specification (shown in italics) are provided below.
5-40kWSize
Review of available small wind turbines data identified approximately 25 manufacturers (3 U.S. manufacturers)
throughout the world that produce small electricity-generating wind turbines in the 5-40 kW rated power range as of
1996. In addition, approximately 10 wind turbines over 6 m in rotor diameter are
being manufactured internationally for water pumping. Based on market potential, small number of U.S.
manufacturers, and the desire to advance the technology, NREL targeted the 5-40 kW range for development.
4
containers for transporting the small wind turbine systems. The primary market drivers for ease of installation are the
developing countries that do not have the infrastructure (roadways, lifting equipment, and
transportation systems) to support small wind turbine installation and erection. Domestic customers living in niral or
remote areas may also have limited access to lifting equipment necessary for turbine erection.
NREL selected CPR as the primary figure of merit for the Small Wind Turbine project to compare the proposed turbine
concepts and to track the development of the design throughout the project. Figure 2 shows average cost performance
data for small wind turbines in the 5-40 kW size. CPR data compiled from individual turbine manufacturers ranged
from 0.48 to 2.43 ($/kWh). When the data was normalized based on the rated power, as shown, CPR does not fall below
the $0.60/kWh or less target (at 5.4 m/s sites) set for the Small Wind Turbine project.
.0
.-,
�
ru
CIJ 2.500
f.
u
:rt 2.000
e
'0" ' -
�
1.500
1.000
t' CIJ 0.500
�..!.
l0I
.s
-
0.000
$0.60
u
.OC
b
ur'"'
IJ 5 1 12. 1 17. 20 25 40
CIJ 0 5 5 5
FIGURE 2 - AVERAGE COST PERFORM ANCE RATIO VERSUS TURBINE SIZE (5-40 kW)
Reduced COE
The Small Wind Turbine project also requires the subcontractor to significantly reduce the cost of energy
(COE) of the proposed concept, relative to the COE of it� baseline turbine, by the year 2000. The life-cycle
COE accounts for initial capital costs (turbine system and balance of station costs), annual operations and
maintenance costs, levelized replacement costs, and net annual energy production, including losses due to blade
soiling, the collection system from turbines to the grid, and miscellaneous losses.
For small wind turbines, COE varies widely depending on the application, location, and other factors, such as fmancing
costs. Reliable cost information necessary for calculating COE is not readily available. As a result, NREL did not select
COE as the primary figure of merit for this project. While the basic units of the CPR are
5
similar to COE, the two figures are not directly comparable because COE is a life-cycle cost model and CPR is
annualized.
APPLICATIONS
Because of the diversity of potential end-uses, proposers were asked to specify their target market and application for their
turbine concept in order to fold in any requirements early in the design phase.
Applications were categorized as grid-connect or constant AC load, wind electrification or variable AC load, or
battery charging or DC load (see Figure 3). Combinations of applications or other applications were considered in the
proposal evaluation as long as the primary output of the turbine was electricity. Grid
W ind ElectrificationAC
f/on'oble AC
SiloI t
/JC
Ba ey
connect can include three-phase or single-phase electricity, and the systems could be owned by utilities, rural
electrification associations, or community mini-grids (either hybrid or battery charging stations). Hybrid systems are
defmed as multiple power sources (e.g., wind turbines, photovoltaics, diesel generators, fuel cells) linked together to
serve stand-alone or small grid electric power needs. Hybrid systems may include
power electronics (e.g., rectifier, inverter), batteries or other forms of storage and dump loads. Wind electrification is power
used directly to run compressors, or shafts (e.g., water pumping, ice making, stripper wells). Intermittent generation is often
acceptable for wind electrification applications, so batteries or other storage are minimal if required. Battery charging is
the third application sought in the RFP. Battery charging
6
systems are used in remote applications that require continuous power, such as telecommuillcation stations and
community battery charging stations. Dump loads are often included in battery charging systems to handle the excess
power after the battery is fully charged.
The RFP was written with the above specifications and applications in mind. However, proposers could modify their
specifications or applications based on their understanding of the market. The R FP was released on June 5, 1996.
Responses to this request were received by September 5, 1996, and subsequent selections were made to four
companies: Bergey Windpower Company; Cannon/Wind Eagle Corporation; WindLite Company; and World Power
Technology, Inc. Negotiations are in process with each of the companies with subcontract awards expected in the July
through October time frame.
Figure 4 shows an artist's rendition of proposed concepts for each subcontractor in the Small Wind Turbine project.
Three of the proposed concepts are based on a typical small wind turbine configuration (upwind, variable speed, furling
overspeed control) and one concept is based on a configuration used on some larger, utility-scale machines (downwind,
constant speed, overspeed control such as aerodynamic brakes or pitch).
Bergey Windpower Company (BWC) is a family-owned manufacturing and project development company formed in
1977 in Norman, Oklahoma. Their company produces three small wind turbines rated at 0.85, 1.5, and 10 kW (BWC
850, BWC 1500 and BWC EXCEL) and has sold 1,600 turbines worldwide since production began in 1980. BWC has
sold its products in more than 70 countries and is well known for
pioneering work in village power and pumping. Mike Bergey will be the project manager and his team will be
supported by Karl Bergey, Dr. Kenneth Craig, Pieter Huebner, and Dr. Michael Selig (University of Illinois).
The proposed 40-kW concept is a three-bladed, upwind, variable-speed, furling machine that meets the market
requirements for village power, primarily battery charging. The proposed rotor diameter is 14-meter with a 55-m tower,
and different rotor diameters will be available to optimize performance for different wind regimes. The pre-prototype
turbine will be tested in Norman, Oklahoma, followed by prototype turbine tests at the NWTC configured as a battery
charger.
Cannon/Wind Energy Systems has been in the business of operating and maintaining windfarms in Tehachapi,
California since 1982. During that time, Cannon has installed over 1,100 turbines and currently manages and operates
567 wind turbines manufactured by Nordtank, Micon, Vestas, and Cannon. The Cannon/Wind Eagle WE-14 team
consists of Craig Lake, Fred Beasom, Jeff Wilks, Robert Ochoa and consultants including Jamie Chapman, Ruth
Heffernan-Marsh, Jay Carter, Sr., Kevin Jackson, and Woody Stoddard.
The proposed 25/30-kW concept is the culmination of more than 15 years of research, design, and development of a
lightweight, flexible turbine design. It is based on a scaled-down model of the 300-kW Wind Eagle utility-grade
turbine which is currently under development. The concept is a two-bladed, large load-shedding 14-meter diameter
rotor, downwind, constant speed, gimballed nacelle turbine with a 36.6 m tilt-down tower.
WindLite Corporation is a new corporation, but is made up of senior people with experience in the wind
7
Small Wind Turbine Project
cannon / W ind
34 kW Bergey Wind Windlite World Po wer Tech.
Eagle power 40kW 8kW 2 0kW
2 blades, 3 bl1des, 3 bl1des, 3 bl1des,
fixed
• • •
• spe a • vanablespe • vanable spe •
•
variablespea:
:
energy field. Robert Lynette will act as the president and marketing director, with Jay Jayadev as the project
manager and Jim Sencenbaugh as the principal investigator. The WindLite team will draw on technical
resources from R. Lynette and Associates. It will also be supported by Mick Sagrillo of Lake Michigan Wind
and Sun and a team of consultants.
The proposed 8-kW concept is a three-bladed, 6. 7-meter diameter rotor, upwind, variable speed, furling
turbine. The primary application for this wind turbine is battery charging. WindLite will perform their
pre-prototype tests at Altamont Pass, close to its facility in Mountain View, California. A prototype will be
tested the NWTC as a battery charger.
World Power Technology has been in business since 1974, starting with its Whisper 1000 machine which
was followed by the Whisper 600, Mariner H500, Whisper 3000, Whisper 4500, and Whisper 900. World
Power Technology produced its thousandth Whisper 1000 in November 1996 and has produced 2500
machines in total. World Power is located in Duluth, Minnesota, and is overseen by a board of directors that
have experience in developing products for various domestic and international markets. Elliott Bayly will be
the principal investigator, and Robert Clarke (President of Alpen) will be the project manager.
The 20-kW proposed concept is a three-bladed, 9-meter rotor diameter, upwind, variable-speed, furling
turbine targeted for grid-connect applications. The pre-prototype will be tested at .a site in Minnesota owned
by World Power Technology. The pre-prototype will then be upgraded to the prototype configuration and
tested at the NWTC as a grid-connect turbine.
8
CONCLUSION
The DOE/NREL Small Wind Turbine project will enable the U.S. wind industry, national laboratories, and
consultants to pool their knowledge and develop cost-effective, high reliability small wind turbines for
domestic and international wind energy markets. Four companies were selected through a competitive
procurement to develop advanced small wind turbine systems for deployment in a wide range of commercial
applications. The turbine designers will follow an iterative engineering development process that will include
formal design reviews at the end of each project stage and tests to verify the system design and analyses.
Docutnentation necessary for IEC Class II turbine certification will be completed by the end of the project.
9
R EFER ENCES
1.
Jechoutek, Karl, R ural Energy and Development- An Action Plan, World Bank Renewable Energy
Roundtable, March 25, 1997.
2.
Serageldin, Ismail, Village Power, Environmentally Sustainable Development, the World Bank;
presentation to the Solar Energy Forum, April 28, 1993.
3.
Sesto, E., Village Power, Environmentally Sustainable Development, the World Bank; presentation
to the Solar Energy Forum, April 28, 1993.
4.
Jechoutek, Karl, R ural Energy and Development- An Action Plan, World Bank Renewable Energy
Roundtable March 25, 1997.
1
0