Respro Notes
Respro Notes
Terminologies
Philosophical Worldviews in Research Method
POST-POSITIVIST – researchers subscribe to the - What data will be gathered
ides that everything should be quantified to - Historical (past)
produce meaningful concrete results. - Descriptive (present)
- Experimental (Future)
“We cannot be positive in our claims of
knowledge when studying behavior and Technique
actions of humans”
- How data will be gathered
- E.g., Survey, Interview, Doodling
Approach OLFU-RDIC Section/ Outline of the
Manuscript
- How data will be processed
- Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed- 1.0 Introduction – Contextual
Method 2.0 Literature Review – Contextual
3.0 Method – Procedural
Research Approaches
4.0 Results – Substantial
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH 5.0 Discussion – Substantial
6.0 Recommendation – Directional
- Approach for exploring and
understanding the meaning individuals
or ground ascribe to a social or human
QUALITAIVE
problem.
“All research ultimately has a qualitative grounding” –
Donald Campbell
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
- Aim is complete detailed description.
- Approach for testing objectives theories
- Researcher may only know roughly in
by examining relationship among
advance what he/she is looking for
variables.
- The design emerges as the study unfolds
MIXED APPROACH - Researcher is the data-gathering
instrument.
- Inquiry involving collecting both Data is in form of words, picture, or
quantitative and qualitative data and object.
integrating the two forms of data. - Subjective – individual’s interpretation of
event is important.
Data are richer, time consuming and less
Research Format: able to be generalized.
- Researchers tends to become subjectively
Traditional – manuscripts are written in by- immersed in the subject matter.
chapter.
Lesson 2
Quantitative Research Approach
Quantitative Research
NON-EXPERIMENTAL
- Statistical, mathematical, computation
methods Seeks to discover the answer to problem
- Expressions are in numerical forms. by describing the data quantitatively or
Objectivity of data (specific numerically.
expectation/standard)
The association or connection between
- Aim to find the relationship between one
variables.
variable to another
(Significant – proven statistically) Determines the relationship of variables
but is incapable of establishing the cause and
Characteristics
effect
• Clearly defined research question
• Generalize concepts more widely, predict
future results, or investigate casual
relationships
Lacks manipulation Lesson 3
Research Title
Lesson 5
Sources of Research Topic
Research Problem
1. OWN EXPERIENCE AND INTEREST
- A clear statement of an inquiry or gap that
- Identify your own interest and formulate a
needs to be addressed through a
problem that reflects them
systematic approach
- Familiarity in your territory and
- Blind Spot
terminology
o Conflicts
o Existing studies with contradicting
2. COLLEAGUES
results
- Brainstorming with friends about
- Blank Spot
problems they have encountered may
o Qualitative
help clarify research ideas
o There is not the same research
3. CRITICAL FRIENDS
o Gaps
- Experts are good sources of research
problems GUIDELINES
4. LITERATURE
- Previous studies and research finding in - Remember, SMART:
which gaps were identified o S – specific
o M – measurable
o A – attainable
3 T’s in selecting Research Topic o R – realistic
o T – time bound
T – timely “napapanahon”
- FORMULATE a research problem that
T – trending “nauuso” reflects the significance of seeking
solutions and answers
- DO NOT STATE your research - Non-research references
problem/questions that is answerable by o These are literature which are not
yes or no based on research findings.
- Research can be stated in a declarative or o Can provide insights and may
interrogative manner. broaden understanding regarding a
- Make sure that the quantitative research topic
problem is answerable by an appropriate o E.g., literary, or artistic works,
statistical method. opinion articles, brochures,
- Formulate a research problem that is magazines, anecdotes.
aligned with your research topic
SOURCES OF RESEARCH LITERATURE
- Primary Source
Lesson 6 o These refer to description of studies
written by the researchers themselves
Review of Related Literature o E.g., published journals, abstracts,
- Summary of the state of existing dissertations, thesis, undergraduate,
knowledge on a research problem or presentation (made by researchers)
topic - Secondary Source
- Analysis and synthesis of articles related o Description/interpretation of studies
to the research topic being studied. written by someone else, other than
- The processes involve: the researchers who conducted them
o Searching relevant articles o E.g., literature review, abstract
o Reading and analyzing research prepared by a reviewer, presentation
reports of research done by someone else
o Writing the description of the PROCESS OF LITERATURE REVIEW
existing information on a topic in a
manner that is ethical based on Composed of several structured steps
standards.
1. Searching relevant articles
2. Reading and analyzing research reports
PURPOSES OF LITERATURE REVIEW 3. Writing the description of the existing
information on a topic in a manner that is
- Allows researcher to identify a research ethical and based on standards
problem of interest
- Aid the researcher to improve his STANDARDS STYLE IN REVIEW OF RELATED
research question or hypothesis LITERATURE, CITATION OR REFERENCES
- Enables the researcher to discover what
Citation
are known and unknown about a certain
topic - Signpost
o It signals the location of a source
TYPES
- An acknowledgement
- Research Literature (empirical o Reveals that you are indebted to that
references) source
o Based on research findings - Provides evidence that scholarly writing is
o Data supported by evidence done, and your position is well-
o E.g., journal articles, literature researched.
reviews, abstracts of research studies - Appear in different formats
o Within the text (in-text citation)
o At the bottom of the page (footnotes)
o At the end of the paper (endnotes)
PARAPHRASE
- IMPLICIT
o Statement_ (authors, year)
- EXPLICIT
o Author_ Year _ Verb _ Statement
- INTRODUCTORY PHRASE WITH
o Verb _ Author _ Year _ Statement
4. PLAGIARISM OF AUTHORSHIP
- Turning in a replication of another’s work
- Submitting a paper from the internet or
friend and presenting it as your own
- The worst type
5. PLAGIARISM OF SELF
- Use of one’s previous work for a separate
assignment or requirement.
- Although the ideas and words are owned
by the author, receiving two credits for a
single output is considered cheating
- Not allowed unless permission is obtained
Prevention
DIRECTIONAL HYPOTHESIS
PROBABILITY SAMPLING
REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE
- There is random selection of sample
- One whose key characteristics closely - There is greater representation in
approximate those of the population each unit in the population
- Each element in the population has
the same equal chance of being
SAMPLING ERROR selected as a sample
- The findings can be generalized to
- Result to overrepresentation or the population
underrepresentation of some
segment of the population
- Occurs if the selection of the sample
does not take place in the way it was
planned
- Smaller sample size = bigger
chance of sampling error
- The appropriate sample size also
depends in the heterogeneity
(Heterogenous group – bigger size) and
TYPES OF NON-PROBABILITY SAMPLING - Fishbowl – write each name on a
card and choose cards through a pure
Convenience Sampling
chance selection.
- Selection of samples based on the - Number Generated – known as
convenience of the researcher sampling frame; give a number to
- Involves the most conveniently member and then use randomized or
available people to participate unordered number in electing name
- Sometimes called Accidental from the list.
Sampling
HYPOTHESIS RELATIONSHIP
MEASUREMENT SCALES
ORDINAL SCALES
- Method METRIC
- From one population you will get
representatives on the in the way of - Specific values
your sampling technique INTERVAL – Arbitrary zero –
POPULATION possible negative values
(temperature, Likert scale)
- Entire aggregation
RATIO – Absolute zero – NO
SAMPLE negative values (test scores, salary)
- Representative NONMETRIC
- Categories/ranking
CONVENIENCE –
proximity/accessibility
Pearson’s Product Moment
Correlation
(PEARSON’S R)
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
P value – 0.73
- PRE-TEST & POST-TEST Significance – 0.05
o 1 group – experimentation
and want to know if the group o Accept Null Hypothesis (Ho) –
will improve there is no significance
MANUSCRIPT
RESEARCH LOCALE
- Geographic
RESEARCH DESIGN
- Approach/comparative or correlation
RESEARCH ETHICS
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS
- Tools