Chapter 1
Chapter 1
First, we examine the potential causes of fluctuations in national income. We use the IS–LM
model to see how changes in the exogenous variables (government purchases, taxes, and the
money supply) influence the endogenous variables (the interest rate and national income).We
also examine how various shocks to the goods markets (the IS curve) and the money market
(the LM curve) affect the interest rate and national income in the short run.
Second, we discuss how the IS–LM model fits into the model of aggregate supply and
aggregate demand. In particular, we examine how the IS–LM model provides a theory of the
slope and position of the aggregate demand curve. Here we relax the assumption that the
price level is fixed, and we show that the IS–LM model implies a negative relationship
between the price level and national income. The model can also tell us what events shift the
aggregate demand curve and in what direction.
How Fiscal Policy Shifts the IS Curve and Changes the Short-Run Equilibrium
We begin by examining how changes in fiscal policy (government purchases and taxes) alter
the economy’s short-run equilibrium. Recall that changes in fiscal policy influence planned
expenditure and thereby shift the IS curve.The IS–LM model shows how these shifts in the IS
curve affect income and the interest rate.
Now consider the money market, as described by the theory of liquidity preference. Because
the economy’s demand for money depends on income, the rise in total income increases the
quantity of money demanded at every interest rate. The supply of money has not changed,
however, so higher money demand causes the equilibrium interest rate r to rise. The higher
interest rate arising in the money market, in turn, has ramifications back in the goods market.
When the interest rate rises, firms cut back on their investment plans. This fall in investment
partially offsets the expansionary effect of the increase in government purchases. Thus, the
increase in income in response to a fiscal expansion is smaller in the IS–LM model than it is
in the Keynesian cross (where investment is assumed to be fixed).You can see this in Figure
11-1.
The horizontal shift in the IS curve equals the rise in equilibrium income in the Keynesian
cross. This amount is larger than the increase in equilibrium income here in the IS–LM
model. The difference is explained by the crowding out of investment caused by a higher
interest rate.
Changes in Taxes: In the IS–LM model, changes in taxes affect the economy much the same
as changes in government purchases do, except that taxes affect expenditure through
consumption. Consider, for instance, a decrease in taxes of T. The tax cut encourages
consumers to spend more and, therefore, increases planned expenditure. The tax multiplier in
the Keynesian cross tells us that, at any given interest rate, this change in policy raises the
level of income by T = MPC/(1-MPC). Therefore, as Figure 11-2 illustrates, the IS curve
shifts to the right by this amount. The equilibrium of the economy moves from point A to
point B. The tax cut raises both income and the interest rate. Once again, because the higher
interest rate depresses investment, the increase in income is smaller in the IS–LM model than
it is in the Keynesian cross.
How Monetary Policy Shifts the LM Curve and Changes the Short-Run Equilibrium
We now examine the effects of monetary policy. Recall that a change in the money supply
alters the interest rate that equilibrates the money market for any given level of income and,
thereby, shifts the LM curve. The IS–LM model shows how a shift in the LM curve affects
income and the interest rate.
Once again, to tell the story that explains the economy’s adjustment from point A to point B,
we rely on the building blocks of the IS–LM model—the Keynesian cross and the theory of
liquidity preference. This time, we begin with the money market, where the monetary-policy
action occurs. When the Federal Reserve increases the supply of money, people have more
money than they want to hold at the prevailing interest rate. As a result, they start depositing
this extra money in banks or use it to buy bonds. The interest rate r then falls until people are
willing to hold all the extra money that the Fed has created; this brings the money market to a
new equilibrium. The lower interest rate, in turn, has ramifications for the goods market. A
lower interest rate stimulates planned investment, which increases planned expenditure,
production, and income Y. Thus, the IS–LM model shows that monetary policy influences
income by changing the interest rate. The IS–LM model shows that an increase in the money
supply lowers the interest rate, which stimulates investment and thereby expands the demand
for goods and services.
Macroeconometric models of the economy provide one way to evaluate policy proposals. A
macroeconometric model is a model that describes the economy quantitatively, rather than
only qualitatively. Many of these models are essentially more complicated and more realistic
versions of our IS–LM model. The economists who build macroeconometric models use
historical data to estimate parameters such as the marginal propensity to consume, the
sensitivity of investment to the interest rate, and the sensitivity of money demand to the
interest rate. Once a model is built, economists can simulate the effects of alternative policies
with the help of a computer.
Table 11-1 shows the fiscal-policy multipliers implied by one widely used macroeconometric
model, the Data Resources Incorporated (DRI) model, named for the economic forecasting
firm that developed it. The multipliers are given for two assumptions about how the Fed
might respond to changes in fiscal policy. One assumption about monetary policy is that the
Fed keeps the nominal interest rate constant. That is, when fiscal policy shifts the IS curve to
the right or to the left, the Fed adjusts the money supply to shift the LM curve in the same
direction. Because there is no crowding out of investment due to a changing interest rate, the
fiscal-policy multipliers are similar to those from the Keynesian cross. The DRI model
indicates that, in this case, the government-purchases multiplier is 1.93, and the tax multiplier
is -1.19. That is, a $100 billion increase in government purchases raises GDP by $193 billion,
and a $100 billion increase in taxes lowers GDP by $119 billion.
The second assumption about monetary policy is that the Fed keeps the money supply
constant so that the LM curve does not shift. In this case, the interest rate rises, and
investment is crowded out, so the multipliers are much smaller. The government-purchases
multiplier is only 0.60, and the tax multiplier is only -0.26.That is, a $100 billion increase in
government purchases raises GDP by $60 billion, and a $100 billion increase in taxes lowers
GDP by $26 billion. Table 11-1 shows that the fiscal-policy multipliers are very different
under the two assumptions about monetary policy. The impact of any change in fiscal policy
depends crucially on how the Fed responds to that change.
allowed to change. As was promised when we began our study of this model, the IS–LM
model provides a theory to explain the position and slope of the aggregate demand curve.
To explain why the aggregate demand curve slopes downward, we examine what happens in
the IS–LM model when the price level changes. This is done in Figure 11-5. For any given
money supply M, a higher price level P reduces the supply of real money balances M/P.A
lower supply of real money balances shifts the LM curve upward, which raises the
equilibrium interest rate and lowers the equilibrium level of income, as shown in panel (a).
Here the price level rises from P1 to P2, and income falls from Y1 to Y2.The aggregate
demand curve in panel (b) plots this negative relationship between national income and the
price level. In other words, the aggregate demand curve shows the set of equilibrium points
that arise in the IS–LM model as we vary the price level and see what happens to income.
1.2.1 Aggregate supply curve under perfect information and flexible prices (LAS)
This model of aggregate supply with perfect information and flexible prices consists of three
key points, which features in all theories of AS. These are:-
1. The labour Market:- it refers to supply of labour and demand for labour
Supply of labour:- it is the households or individuals decision on how much labour to
supply how much leisure to consume and how much consumption to undertake given the
generalize of prices & wage rates. Supply curve of labour is an upward sloping.
Demand for labour:- It is the firms decision on how much labor to employed given their
capital stock or other inputs, the price of their outputs & wage rate, the demand curve for
labour is downward-sloping.
2. Production Technology:- The technology available which describes the technical
relationship between inputs (labour & capital) and outputs produced is assumed to be the
constant return to scale.
3. The capital stock:- The capital stock which is used to produce outputs is assumed to be
constant or fixed in the short run. But it changes overtime in the long run due to the net
investment being increasing & positive.
In addition to the above stated key points, the model includes the following three assumptions
which explain about how the market works.
1. Perfect information:- It refers to everyone knows all of the current and past values of all
prices in the economy.
2. Flexible prices:- The prices of inputs and final goods are flexible so that they are free to
rise if excess demand occurs and fall if excess supply occurs.
3. Clearing markets:- It refers to there is neither excess supply nor excess demand and it
is a consequence of the first two assumptions.
Putting the three key points and the basic assumptions together the AS curve has a shape of
vertical alignment.
AS
Price levels, p
Output, y.
Vertical AS curve
Vertical AS curve depends crucially on the assumptions of prefect information and market
clearing which is the long run phenomenon. So vertical AS curve is the long run aggregate
supply curve (LAS) and hence shift in aggregate demand curve affects only the price level
but the output level remained constant.
In order to analyze the profit maximization behaviour of firms we should consider the short
run production function of the competitive firm. Thus in the short run labor is the only
variable input and mixed together with the fixed capital stock so that the marginal product of
labor (MPL) is declining as more and more labor is employed with a fixed supply of capital.
Therefore, at profit maximization position, firms continue to employ labor until the marginal
cost (MC) is equated with marginal revenue (MR). Mathematically, the MC & MR can be
defined as follow:
MC TC / Q and MR TR / Q
Where TC, TR & Q stands for total cost, total revenue & output respectively. TC& TR can
also be defined as: TC=WL+ rk and TR=PXQ
Where w & r refers to wage rate and rent which describes the unit cost of labor & capital
respectively; L & K stands for units of labor & capital respectively; and Q & P stands for
output & price levels respectively. Since the only variable or charged input is labor the
change in total cost comes as a result of change in labor input. i.e, TC / L W and the
change in total revenue is computed as = TR / Q P MR
instance, the workers have incomplete information about the price level of the products which
is completely known by the firms.
Since information is incomplete and imperfect in both input & output markets both workers
and firms form their rationale expectations on the price and wage rate levels. This leads the
aggregate supply curve to be upward sloping and it is termed as the Lucas aggregate supply
curve.
Price level, p
AS
P2 ……………………
Pe ………………
P1 …………....
y1 y* y2 output, y.
Lucas Aggregate supply curve, LASC
The LASC represents the short run aggregate supply curve (SASC) in which the change in
AD curve affects both price & output levels.
Although the economic policy makers have two main goals- low inflation and low
unemployment, these goals are usually conflicted in the short run. For example, when the
economy moves from point A to point B in the above graph in the short run the output
increases (form Y1 to Y2) and also the price level increases (from P1 to P2). Since firms need
more workers when they produce more output, higher output means lower unemployment
where as higher price level means higher inflation. Thus, the economy experiences lower
unemployment but higher inflation which shows a short run trade off between unemployment
and inflation
However, when we consider the movement of an economy from point A to point C the output
level remained constant at Y1 although there is along run increase in price level. This implies
that higher inflation is associated with constant unemployment which reflects the no more
trade off between inflation and unemployment
The short run trade of between inflation and unemployment is called the Philips curve which
is drivel from the AS curve and it is a useful way of explaining short run aggregate supply
curve. The Philips curve is derive from the As in the following manure: in the Philips curve
analysis, the inflation rate (Π) depends on three forces: expected inflation (Π e); the devotion
of unemployment (u) from the natural (u n), which is called cyclical unemployment (u-u n),
and the supply shocks (v)
Thus the three forces form the following equation which summarizes the relationship
between inflation and unemployment.
i.e, Π = Π e - (u-u n)+ v
Where is a parameter measuring the response of inflation to cyclical unemployment and the
minus sign before cyclical unemployment reflects that high unemployment tends to reduce
inflation. This equation of inflation is derived from the equation of aggregate supply through
the following algebraic manipulations.
Firstly, we need to write the aggregate supply equation as: p=p e + (1/x)(Y-Y) and add the
supply shock V to the right hand side of the equation to represent exogenous events such as a
change in world oil prices that alter the price level P and hence shifts that aggregate supply
curve.
p p e 1 (Y Y ) v
Secondly, to go from price level to inflation rates, subtract last year’s price level P-1 from
both sides of the equation to obtain
p p 1 ( p e p 1 ) 1 (Y Y ) v
The term on the left hand side, P-P-1 is the different between the current price level and last
year’s price level, which is inflation Π. Similarly the term on the right-hand side, pe –p -1, is
the difference between the expected price level and the last year’s price level, which is
expected is expected inflation Π e. therefore, we replace p-p-1 with Π and pe –p -1 with Π e and
thus the above equation can be rewritten as
e 1 (Y Y ) v
Thirdly, to go from output to unemployment we need to use okun’s which gives the
relationship between the two variables. This law states that the deviation of output from its
natural rate is inversely related to the deviation of unemployment from its natural rate. That
is, when output is higher than the natural rate of output, unemployment.
1 (Y Y ) (u u n )
So through substituting -B (u-un) for (1/x) (y-y) in the previous equation we can get
e (u u n ) v
Now we are in apposition that the Phillips curve is derived from the aggregate supply curve
through one addition, one subtraction and one substitution techniques of mathematical
manipulations.