0% found this document useful (0 votes)
366 views

Quality Assurance Plan

This document outlines a quality assurance plan for the renovation works of Wiegh Bridge. It details various quality checks that will be performed at different stages of construction including surveys, surface dressing, base preparation, subgrade preparation, and granular sub-base layers. The plan specifies the type and extent of checks, acceptance norms, records to be maintained, and responsibilities of the contractor, third party inspection agency, and client.

Uploaded by

Sasanka Sekhar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
366 views

Quality Assurance Plan

This document outlines a quality assurance plan for the renovation works of Wiegh Bridge. It details various quality checks that will be performed at different stages of construction including surveys, surface dressing, base preparation, subgrade preparation, and granular sub-base layers. The plan specifies the type and extent of checks, acceptance norms, records to be maintained, and responsibilities of the contractor, third party inspection agency, and client.

Uploaded by

Sasanka Sekhar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

CLIENT: TOMPL.
SUBJECT: QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN FOR WIEGH BRIDGE RENOVATION WORKS (REV- 01)
PO NO:

Agency
Extent of Reference Records to be
Sl. No Item Category Type / Method of check Acceptance norms Format of record Remarks
check document furnished CONTRACTOR TPIA CLIENT

A B C D E F G H I J L
1 Survey

Co-ordinates / Levels of
a) Bench Mark recoding of all Critical Visual checks 100% Approved Drg. As per approved Drg. Joint Record Yes P RW RW Site Verification/Review
effected working area

Checking of bottom levels & Verifiaction of Calibartion


b) Critical 100% Approved Drg. As per approved Drg. Calibration report Yes External Agency RW RW Site Verification/Review
marked C/L by TS system certifiacte

Verifiaction of Calibartion
c) Prizom Checking Critical 100% Approved Drg. As per approved Drg. Prizom repprt Yes External Agency RW RW Site Verification/Review
certifiacte

2 Surface dressing
Specifications/ Specifications/
a) Checking for layout Major Dimensional check 100% Joint Records Yes P RW RW Site Verification/Review
Methodology Methodology

Breaking with proper side


Specifications/ Specifications/
b) slopes, Shoring Removing Major Visual Checks 100% Joint Records No P RW RW Site Verification/Review
Methodology Methodology
of Water, etc.

Checking location, firm bed, Specifications/ Specifications/


c) Major Visual Checks 100% -- yes P RW RW Site Verification/Review
levels, free from slush Methodology Methodology

Disposal/proper stacking of
Specifications/ Specifications/
d) breaking materials in Minor Visual Checks 60% -- No P RW RW Site Verification/Review
Methodology Methodology
demarked area.

3 Base Preparation

Base should be compacted Core Cutter Method as per IS


as per MPDD 95% (Lab test sepcification wise, 03 No pit Specifications/ As per IS 2720 Part 8 &
a) Critical 100% Joint Records (Compaction Resgister) Yes External Agency RW RW Site Verification/Review
report for MDD & OMC by reqd. in 500 SQM area as per Methodology Part 29
Modified Proctor) IRC standard specification wise

4 Subgrade Preparation
Subgarde should be 500 mm
thickness (as per IRC 15-
2017 Clause 6.1) in two
layers as per standard
specification wise & Core Cutter Method as per IS
according to MORT&H 5th sepcification wise, 03 No pit Specifications/ As per IS 2720 Part 8 &
a) Critical 100% Joint Records (Compaction Resgister) Yes External Agency RW RW Site Verification/Review
revision, also the MDD will reqd. in 500 SQM area as per Methodology Part 29
be min 1.75 gm/cc as per IRC standard specification wise
standard specification wise,
also CBR value reqd. min
8% as per IRC 15-2017
page no-18 (Clause 6.3.5)

Checking of thickness Thickness checked by Auto Specifications/ As per IRC 15-2017,


b) Critical 100% Joint Record Yes P RW RW Site Verification/Review
tolerence Level Methodology Table 10 page no-75

5 GSB 1st/2nd layer (as per approved Drg. Single or Double layer) with min 98 % Compaction as per IRC 15-2017/MORT&H 5th revision

For each & every layer of


Filling & compcation (in Sand Replacement Method as
GSB bed compaction test
layers not more than 200 per IS 2720 part 28, for density
Specifications/ As per IS 2720 Part 8 & reqd. GSB GR V for base
a) mm) with min 98% reqd. as Critical with compaction test one test 100% Joint Records (Compaction Resgister) Yes P RW RW
Methodology Part 28 layer & GSB Gr IV for
per standard IRC 15-2017 to be conducted every 2000
Drainage layer above on base
specificatio wise SQM
layer

Specifications/ Specifications/
b) Check for pre & final level Critical Auto Level 100% Joint Records Yes P RW RW Site Verification/Review
Methodology Methodology

Lab Test for gradation of GSB Lab test report with Agg. AIV, LL &
Test of GSB (Gradation V) as per IRC 15-2017 Table 4, PL, CBR more than 30% with 98% Dry Gradation of GSB will be
Specifications/ As per MORT&H
c) Materials as per IRC 15- Critical page no-18 wise by IS sieving, 100% density, Gradation I (or as mentioned in Yes External Agency RW RW conducted as per mentioned
Methodology Section 400
2017 Table 4 also one test per 500 m3 approved BOQ) as per IRC 15-2017 frequecy or else random wise
subjected to min 2 test per day Table 4 wise, once for each source

Checking of thickness Thickness checked by Auto Specifications/ As per IRC 15-2017,


d) Critical 100% Joint Record Yes P RW RW Site Verification/Review
tolerence Level Methodology Table 10 page no-75
7 PCC M 10 (1:3:6)/M 15 (1:2:4) Grade of Concrete as per approved Drg.

Free fall Height should be


Before Pouring of Concrete Lab Test report with proper MTC reqd .
mainted at site for avoiding
thickness 100 mm Specifications/ As per IS 456, IS 4031 (NC, setting time of Cement,
a) Critical Visual Check 100% Yes External Agency RW RW any kind of Seggregation.
(compacted) or as per Methodology & IS 10262 Compressive Strength, Soundness &
Reports are submitted before
approved Drg. Wise Fineness Test of Cement)
working at site.

Checking of vibrating by
Site Verification/Review &
neddle / plate Vibrator Specifications/
b) Major Visual Check 80% As per IS 2505/2506 -- Yes P RW RW minimum 14 days Curing
before & during the pouring Methodology
reqd.
of concrete

Checking of Camber, as per


Checking of dimension & levels Specifications/ Specifications/
c) approved Drg. during Critical 100% Joint Records Yes P RW RW Site Verification/Review
by Auto levels Methodology Methodology
pouring of concrete

8 Reinforcement (Fe-500 D) or IS 432 Part 1 Grade 1 as per mentioned in BOQ

Checking of reinforcement
As per IS 1786-2008, Lab Test report with proper MTC
as per IS 432 oart 1 grade 1 Visual Check with dimensions Specifications/
a) Critical 100% For Dowel bar IS 432 (BendTest, Rebend Test, Carbon Yes External Agency RW RW Site Verification/Review
for Diwel bar & IS 1786 as per approved BBS Methodology
Part 1 & IS 2502 Content & UTS with YS & Elongation)
2008 Tie Bar

9 Curing (Water Ponding/Sparying with Hessian cloths)

Minimum 14 days reqd.


Curing is essential for 14 Specifications/
a) Major Visual Check 100% As per IS 456 As per site surveillance wise Yes P RW RW unless any other special cases
days minimum Methodology
as directed by EIC of TOMPL

10 Back filling (If applicable in Road work as per approved Drg.)

Filling and compaction in


As per IS 2720 Part 7, Layer thickness as per site
a) layers not more than 500mm Critical Visual Checks 100% Specifications Joint Records (Compaction Resgister) Yes External Agency RW RM
Part 16 & Part 29 requirements
& CBR value not less than 5

Filling & Compaction of


b) sand & aggregate around Major Visual Checks 100% Specifications Specifications Joint Records Yes P RW RW Site Verification/Review
the PVC pipe

c) Check for final level Major Visual Checks 100% Drawings Drawings Joint Records Yes P RW RW Site Verification/Review

11 M 40 PQC grade

Lab Test report with proper MTC reqd .


(NC, setting time of Cement,
Compressive Strength, Soundness &
Fineness Test of Cement) & detailed Free fall Height should be
Mix Design report with trial mix. Also mainted at site for avoiding
Before Pouring of Concrete Specifications/ As per IS 456, IS 4031,
a) Critical Visual Check 100% Agg. Mechanical properties (Crushing Yes External Agency RW RW any kind of Seggregation.
as per approved Drg. wise Methodology IS 10262 - 2019
value, Impact Value with Combined Reports are submitted before
Flakiness & Elongation index, working at site.
Gradation of 10 mm,20mm & Sand
Zone II) must be mentioned in Design
Mix report as per IS 383 - 2016 wise

Visual check reqd. fro every


Checking Slump test as Specifications/ As per IS 1199 Part 2 As per approved design mix of M 30
b) Critaical transit mixer or per batch of 100% Yes P RW RW Site Verification/Review
perIS 1199 Part 2 2018 Methodology 2018 grade of concrete
Ajax machine

Checking vibrating
Specifications/
c) needle/plate vibrator before Critical Visual Check 100% As per IS 2505/2506 -- No P RW RW Site Verification/Review
Methodology
the pouring of concrete
Checking of Transverse joint
should not more than 4.0 m as
Size of Panels as per Specifications/ Specifications/ Joint Records (Maintained in Pour Card
e) Critical per IRC 15-2017 Clause 8.3 100% Yes P RW RW Site Verification/Review
approved Drg. Methodology Methodology & Cube test register in panel wise)
wise or as per Design
specifiaction wise.

Checking Dowel Bars & Tie


Checking of Dowel bars as per
Bars as per IRC 15-2017 or
approved Drg. or IRC-15-2017
as per approved Drg. wise Specifications/ Specifications/ Joint records (also maintained in the
f) Critical Clause 8.3.6 to 8.3.11 & For 100% Yes P RW RW Site Verification/Review
before the pouring of Methodology Methodology Pour Card as per Panel wise)
Tie bars as per IRC -15-2017
concrete (If red. As per
Table 8 wise
approved Drg.)

Checking of thickness
Thickness checked by Auto Specifications/ Specifications/
g) tolerence during & after the Critical 100% Joint Record Yes P RW RW Site Verification/Review
Level Methodology Methodology
pouring of concrete

Checking of Camber, as per


Checking of dimension & levels Specifications/ Specifications/
h) approved Drg. during Critical 100% Joint Records Yes P RW RW Site Verification/Review
by Auto levels Methodology Methodology
pouring of concrete

As per BIS 456 2000 clause


Visual Check, dimension 15.2 Cube sampling reqd. or
Cube sampling & testing
checking reqd. for cube moulds Specifications/ Compressive strength checking at 7 & for each of Weigh Bridge 12
i) during the pouring of Critical 100% As per IS 456 & IS 516 Yes External Agency RW RW
150 mm standard Size as per IS Methodology 28 days curing as per IS 516 part 1 wise Nos of Cubes shall be casted
concrete
10086 & IRC 15-2017 wise & will be tested for both 7 &
28 days of curing

Legends: P PERFORM
R RANDOM Prepared By: Sasanka Dey
W WITNESS General Manager
RW RANDOM WITNESS
RM RANDOM MONITORING
THIRD PARTY
TPIA INSPECTION
AGENCY
STANDARD
SPDD PROCTOR DRY
DENSITY

You might also like