Unit 2 Contract and Its Elements
Unit 2 Contract and Its Elements
Santosh K.C
Learning Unit 2
2. Business Transactions
2.1 Law of contract
Before understanding the law of contract prior knowledge on contract is necessary as contract law is
related to regulation of contract.
Contract can be said as an agreement made between two or more parties to do or not to do something
that is enforceable by law.
The law that regulates the contract is called the contract law/ law of contract. It deals with the general
principle of law governing all contracts, limits of contractual obligation, performance and discharge,
remedies for breach together with the provisions of special contract such as: Bailment, Guarantee etc.
It lay down the information that what the party to the contract can do or cannot do. It also deals about the
obligation of performance of duty emerging out the contract and give remedy for the violation of
obligation.
What is contract?
1. According to contract Act 2056 section 2(a) “Contract is an agreement made between two or
more than two parties do or not to do something that is enforceable by law.”
2. Similarly Indian Contract Act 1872 Section 2 define “Contract is an agreement enforceable by
law”
Many scholars has also tried to define the contract
1. According to Salmond “Contract is an agreement creating and defining obligation between the
parties.”
2. According to F Pollock “A contract is a promise or set of promise for the breach of which law
provide remedy.”
Similarly Supreme Court of Nepal in a case of Sarki Kami v. Kancho Kami NKP 2048 page 546 define
Contract as
“To be a contract there should be agreement between two or more than two parties to do or not to do
something and if there is element of offer and acceptance then that could be said as contract.”
Thus the contract is an agreement made between the parties to do or not to do something that should be
enforceable by law. Generally from above definition four elements should be there for contract
E.g. A offered to B that you provide me your laptop I will pay 40000 and if B accepts then there is
contract.
Nature of contract
In a case of Karishma Impex v. National Trading Limited, Nepal Law Journal 2048, Decision no. 4444 p.
691 Supreme Court held that “ the parties to the contract can create mutual obligation by agreeing upon
the term and condition as per their need within the boundary of law.
2. It is the private law and performance is 2. It is also private law in general but it must be
limited to the parties generally followed while making contract.
4. it can be the source of contract law 4. it is not the source for contract
There must be consensus ad idem (Meeting of mind) for valid offer and acceptance. If somebody offers in
one way and other party accept in another way that is not acceptance. Moreover the terms of offer must be
definite and acceptance should also be absolute.
In the case of Balfour v. Balfour 1919 K.B 571 the English court of law held "the agreement between
husband and wife is totally a domestic nature and not a contract".
Similarly in the case of Spellman v Spellman (1961) 2 AER 498 English court of law also upheld the
former decision and held "agreement of domestic nature doesn’t create legal obligation to the parties and
it is not a contract."
Thus to be a valid contract there should be element of intention to create legal relationship.
3. Lawful consideration
Generally consideration implies "something in return." It equally implies the concept of "something for
something." In Latin term it is said as a Quid Pro Quo. That means if one party to the contract has given
something to another then he has right to get something from another party. E.g. Ram and Shyam enter
into a contract for sell and purchase of Motorbike; here money and bike for each other are the
consideration.
Consideration must be lawful and those contracts that have unlawful consideration are void contract as
per the section 13 of NCA 2056. Here unlawful consideration means consideration that are prohibited by
law like consideration in the form of weapon, drugs etc.
4. Competent Parties
The parties to the contract must be capable of entering into the contract. Contract made by the parties
those are incapable in the eye of law is void as per the section 13 of NCA 2056.
According to section 3 of the NCA 2056 any person other than mention below is eligible to make a
contract.
Generally above mention person cannot make the contract and contract made by them is not valid and it is
void as per the section 13 of NCA 2056
However if any specific law made them as capable of doing contract then contract made by them is also
valid one.
Moreover contract done by the guardian of above mention person except C category for the benefit of
them then the contract is valid.
5. Free consent
The free consent is also an important essential to be a valid contract. Consent is said to free if there is
absence of fraud, misrepresentation, mistake, coercion and undue influence.
Contract done without free consent is voidable as per the section 14 of NCA2056, and the aggrieved party
can make contract void by lodging case in court of law.
Class notes for BBIS
Santosh K.C
E.g. Ram and Kailash enter into the contract for sell and purchase of 5 ropani land and Kailash is going to
sell 5 ropani lands to Ram because Ram has told him otherwise he will kill him. This contract is voidable
because Kailash didn’t have given free consent rather in coercion.
6. Legal Objective
The objective of contract should be legal for validity of contract. Whenever parties enter into the contract
the purpose and object should be valid one.
Objective of contract is said to be lawful if (i) it is permitted by law (ii) it is not forbidden by law
If the contract have illegal objective then it is not valid contract and is a void contract as per the section
13 of NCA 2056. E.g. Contract for killing, Contract for carrying a business of prostitution.
7. Certain Meaning
Contract should have certain meaning and it should not have any confusion and ambiguity in obligation to
the parties. Even the court of law doesn’t recognize the contract that has uncertain meaning. Thus the
contract should have certain and definite meaning.
Ram accepts to sell Hari "hundred tons of oil". There is nothing whatever to show, what kind of oil is
intended. It may be kerosene, sunflower and mustard. This is not a valid contract.
8. Possible to perform
Contract is the private law created by the parties for themselves. Thus it should be possible to perform.
Contract that cannot perform is void and doesn’t create any legal obligation to the party. Like, contract on
selling Bike which is not in the name of party.
9. Legal formalities
Generally court of law recognize both Oral and Written contract. But if there is specific law that requires
the contract should have written or register then to create a valid contract, those legal formalities should
be followed. E.g. Section 25 of NCA, Bailment above 5000 should be written.
Agreement Contract
1. Offer and acceptance constitute an agreement 1. Agreement must be enforceable at law to be a contract.
2. An agreement may or may not create legal 2. Contract necessarily create legal obligation.
obligation
4. All agreement are not contract 4. All contracts are agreement itself.
5. An agreement may not be recognize by the law 5. To be a valid contract it should be recognize by the
law.