Lecture-III Basics of Pinch Analysis
Lecture-III Basics of Pinch Analysis
Lecture –III
Pinch Analysis and Process Integration
How?
• This procedure is possible through thermodynamics
principles.
▪ Targets can be set for the heat exchanger network to assess the performance of the
complete process design without actually having to carry out the network design.
▪ These targets allow both energy and capital cost for the heat exchanger network
to be assessed.
▪ The targets allow the designer to suggest process changes for the reactor and
separation and recycle systems to improve the targets for energy and capital cost of
the heat exchanger network( Onion Model)
• When designing heat exchangers and other unit operations, limitations imposed
by the first and second laws of thermodynamics constrain what can be done
with such equipment.
– For example, in a heat exchanger, a close approach between hot and cold
streams requires a large heat transfer area.
Pinch point
➢ Whenever the driving forces for heat or mass exchange are small, the equipment needed
for transfer becomes large and it is said that the design has a pinch.
• .
• The savings received over the life of the plant by using heat integration are (–
471,000 + 1,636,000) = $1,165,000!
The heat integration saves money in two ways:
(1) The cooling water utility is reduced and the high-pressure steam is eliminated,
(2) Heat exchanger E-203 is smaller because the duty is reduced, and E-202 is also
smaller due to the fact that hps condenses at 254°C
Stream information
Heat stream
• For efficient Heat Recovery in industry, the relevant data must be identified
and presented systematically.
– In the field of Heat Integration, this process is referred to as data extraction
Class Activities: Flowsheet with two hot streams and two cold streams
ΔH=27 MW
ΔH=-30 MW
Feed 2 230ºC
Product 2
Reactor 2
140ºC
200ºC 80ºC
ΔH=32 MW
Off Gas
Feed 1 Reactor 1 40ºC
20ºC 180ºC 250ºC
o Total hot streams heat duty =
ΔH=-31.5 MW 61.5 MW (Surplus)
o Total cold streams heat duty =
Coln 59 MW (Deficit)
1. Tabulate the four streams 40ºC
40ºC
2. If the hot utility load is increased by any value α, the cold utility is increased by α as well. As
the stream heat loads are constant, this also means that the heat exchanged falls by α.
Add up
∆H1 = CPA(T1-T2);
∆H2 = (CPA +CPB+ CPC)(T2-T3);
∆H3 = (CPA+CPC)(T3-T4);
∆H4cold
➢ A similar procedure gives a cold composite curve of all the = (CPA(T4-T5)
streams in a problem
▪ Overlap between the composite curves represents the maximum amount of heat recovery possible
▪ Overshoot at the bottom represents the minimum amount of external cooling required
▪ Overshoot at the top represents the minimum amount of external heating required
➢ There are three possible ways of moving the hot and cold composite
curves closer together by ΔTmin, so that they touch at the pinch.
3. Use the shifted temperatures, which are a mean value; all hot stream
temperatures are reduced by ΔTmin/2 and all cold stream temperatures
are increased by ΔTmin/2.
➢ Approach 3 has been the most commonly adopted, we will follow for
designing of the heat exchanger network
➢ The use of the interval temperature rather than the actual temperatures allows the minimum
temperature difference to be taken into account. ∆Tmin = 10oC for the problem being
considered;
19/12/2022 Lecture on Integrated process Design by Nigus Gabbiyev(PhD) 31
Basic concepts of pinch analysis : The Problem Table
Algorithm
➢ The amount that can be recovered depends on the relative slopes of the
two curves in the temperature interval.
➢ This problem can be overcome if, purely for the purposes of construction, the
hot composite is shifted to be ∆Tmin /2 colder than it is in practice and that the
cold composite is shifted to be ∆ Tmin /2 hotter than it is in practice as shown
in Figure b. The shifted composite curves now touch at the pinch.
Where:-
➢ First, the stream population of the process segments falling within each
temperature interval (the second two columns of Table 3) is identified. The
sums of the segment CPs (heat capacity flow rates) in each interval are
calculated; then that sum is multiplied by the interval temperature difference
(i.e., the difference between the TBs that define each interval). This
calculation is also illustrated in Table 3
▪ Some of the heat flows in Figure(a) are negative, which is infeasible. Heat cannot be
transferred up the temperature scale.
▪ To make the cascade feasible, sufficient heat must be added from hot utility to make the
heat flows to be at least zero. The smallest amount of heat needed from hot utility is the
largest negative heat flow from Figure (a), that is 7.5 MW.
There is an imbalance which must be supplied by utilities – external heating and cooling.
▪ Above the pinch, ΔQC > ΔQH and the difference must be supplied by hot utility.
▪ Below the pinch ΔQH < ΔQC and the excess heat is removed by cold utility.
120 0 85
82.5 140
100
80 145
Pinch T(s) = 850C 20 165
80
60
▪ The Problem Table and its graphical
representation, the GCC, give the same
40
results (including the pinch location) more
20
Cooling duty 60 kW easily.
0
▪ Energy targeting is a powerful design and
0 20 40 60 80 100