Research Methodology An Introduction For-1
Research Methodology An Introduction For-1
Methodology:
An Introduction for Undergraduates
SECOND EDITION, December 2022.
2022 - 2023
Table of Contents
Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... i
Course Description ................................................................................................................................ iii
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................... 26
Books ...................................................................................................................................................... 26
Articles.................................................................................................................................................... 26
Online resources .................................................................................................................................... 26
Course Description
This is a basic introduction to the methodology of research, or specifically: an introduction to ‘how
to conduct your end-of-term monograph’. Obviously stated, this course is addressed to
undergraduate students of university, simply because this is the category of students who are
required to submit an end-of-term monograph!
Please understand, that, this is not an academic research paper, it is just a humble attempt to
simplify things to my colleagues – yes, I am just an undergraduate student same as you, for now –
far away from the very complicated academic norm that apparently some lecturers like to embrace.
The course is based on the syllabus and lectures of the professor Zakaria Jamaati
([email protected]), Department of English Language and Culture, Faculty of Languages, Arts
and Humanities, Ait Melloul, Morocco.
Different sources constitute this work, the following could be considered the main:
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating
quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.
Hacker, D., & Sommers, N. (2013). APA pocket style manual. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age
International.
Youssef Idammi
Ait Melloul, Morocco
November 2022
iii Readings selected and edited by: Mr. IDAMMI YOUSSEF, [email protected]
University of Ibn Zohr - Agadir, Morocco Department of English Studies - LINGUISTICS
Faculty of Languages, Arts and Humanities Course: RESEARCH PROJECT I - Semester 5
However, many more factors such as directives of government, employment conditions, curiosity
about new things, desire to understand causal relationships, social thinking and awakening, and
the like may as well motivate people to perform research operations.
All other types of research are variations of one or more of the above stated approaches, based on
either the purpose of research, or the time required to accomplish research, on the environment in
which research is done, or on the basis of some other similar factor.
defined as “principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the
recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and
experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.”
Research is just another name for gathering data and information, analyzing it and then arriving
at results, which is primarily what scientists do. To many, scientists appear as outlandish as they
possess much deeper knowledge than common people. To an extent, this is true but they are
scientists not because of their knowledge but because of their scientific method which produces
results that are testable and tend to produce similar results when replicated. Any research that does
not follow scientific methods is doomed to fail as authenticity of the results does not stand chance
against scientific enquiry and analysis.
2.3.1. Inductive reasoning – the empiricist’s approach
Inductive reasoning involves developing generalizations based on observation of a limited
number of related events or experiences.
Inductive reasoning starts from specific observations or sensory experiences and then
develops a general conclusion from them. This simple example gives an indication of the
line of reasoning:
All the giraffes that I have seen have very (Repeated observations)
long necks.
Therefore, I conclude that all giraffes have (Conclusion)
long necks.
Limitations of induction
How many observations must be made before a reasonably reliable conclusion
could be drawn?
Could conclusions based on induction be generalized?
Under which conditions should observations be made so a valid conclusion can be
attained?
Limitations of deduction
In order for a theory to be tested, it must be expressed as a statement called a
hypothesis. The essential nature of a hypothesis is that it must be falsifiable. This
means that it must be logically possible to make true observational statements
which conflict with the hypothesis, and thus can falsify it. However, the process of
falsification leads to a devastating result of total rejection of a theory, requiring a
completely new start.
Limited evidence in observations.
The truth of the conclusions depends very much basically on the truth of the
premise.
2.3.3. Hypothetico-deductive reasoning (Scientific Method)
The hypothetico-deductive method combines inductive and deductive reasoning, resulting
in a to-and-from process; and it involves five major steps:
1 Observe the world and creatively decide on some problem that you’d like to solve.
2 Based on observations, form a hypothesis – try to state an explanation!
3 Deduce/derive predictions1 from the hypothesis – if you assume the hypothesis is
true, what consequences follow?
4 Practical or theoretical testing of the hypothesis – look for evidence (observations)
that conflict with these predictions in order to disprove the hypothesis.
5 If the observations match the prediction, the hypothesis is rendered more
probable. If they contradict the prediction, the hypothesis is disproved so you go
back to step 2 and find yourself a new hypothesis!
It is this combination of experience with deductive and inductive reasoning that is the
foundation of modern scientific research, commonly referred to as scientific method. It
was only by the beginning of the 1960s that Karl Popper formulated the idea of the
hypothetico-deductive method, even though it must have already been used in practice for
decades (Walliman, 2010: 20).
1
Difference between a hypothesis and a prediction: A hypothesis is an idea about how something works that can be
tested using experiments. A prediction says what will happen in an experiment if the hypothesis is correct.
subsequent steps. However, the following order concerning various steps provides a useful
procedural guideline regarding the research process:
1. Formulating the research problem; 6. Collecting and processing data;
2. Extensive literature review; 7. Analysis of data;
3. Development of working hypotheses; 8. Hypothesis-testing;
4. Preparing the research design; 9. Generalizations and interpretation;
5. Determining sample design; 10. Preparation of the report or the thesis.
We will look more deeply at the steps involved in the process of research later in this course.
There are several factors which may result in making the problem complicated. For
instance:
2
course of action n. (pl. courses of action): a plan; a set of intended actions, through which one intends to achieve a
goal. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/course_of_action
• The environment may change affecting the efficiencies of the courses of action or
the values of the outcomes;
• The number of alternative courses of action may be very large;
• Persons not involved in making the decision may be affected by it and react to it
favorably or unfavorably, and similar other factors.
Such elements (or at least the important ones) may be thought of in context of a research
problem.
3.1.2. Selecting the Research Problem
The research problem undertaken for study must be carefully selected. The task is a difficult
one although it may not appear to be so. Help may be taken from a research guide in this
connection. However, the following points may be observed by a researcher in selecting a
research problem or a subject for research:
(i) Subject which is overdone should not be normally chosen, for it will be a
difficult task to throw any new light in such a case.
(ii) Controversial subjects should not become the choice of an average
researcher.
(iii) Too narrow or too vague problems should be avoided.
(iv) The subject selected for research should be familiar and feasible so that the
related research material or sources of research are within one’s reach.
(v) The importance of the subject, the qualifications and the training of a
researcher, the costs involved, and the time factor are few other criteria that
must also be considered in selecting a problem.
(vi) The selection of a problem must be preceded by a preliminary study if the
field of inquiry is relatively new.
3.1.3. Technique Involved in Defining a Research Problem
The research problem should be defined in a systematic manner, giving due weightage to
all relating points. The technique for this purpose involves the undertaking of the following
steps generally one after the other:
(i) Statement of the problem in a general way;
(ii) Understanding the nature of the problem;
(iii) Surveying the available literature;
(iv) Developing the ideas through discussions;
(v) Rephrasing the research problem into a working proposition.
For an in-depth comprehension of each step above, see (Kothari, 2004: pp. 27-29).
3.4.1. How Does the Literature Review Differ for Quantitative and
Qualitative Studies?
In a quantitative study, researchers discuss the literature extensively at the beginning of
a study. This serves two major purposes: it justifies the importance of the research problem,
and it provides a rationale for (and foreshadows) the purpose of the study and research
questions or hypotheses. […] The authors may also include the literature into the end of
the study to confirm or disconfirm prior predictions made at the beginning of the study.
In a qualitative study, the literature serves slightly differently. Similar to quantitative
research, the authors mention the literature at the beginning of the study to document or
justify the importance of the research problem, but unlike quantitative studies, they do not
discuss it extensively […]. In many qualitative projects, researchers often cite the literature
at the end of the study as a contrast or comparison with the major findings in the study.
3.4.2. Steps in conducting a Literature Review
Although conducting a literature review follows no prescribed path, if you plan to design
and conduct a study, you will typically go through the following interrelated steps:
1 Identify key terms (keywords) to use in your search for literature.
2 Search for relevant literature to your topic by using your keywords. Some
useful databases to search for journals and articles include: (e.g., Google
Scholar, JSTOR, etc.)
3 Critically evaluate and select the literature for your review. Look for Quality,
Accuracy, Authority of reference, Non-Biasness, Specificity, etc.
4 Analyze and organize your sources using a literature matrix (e.g., Zotero.org).
5 Organize the literature you have selected by understanding the connections and
relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and
notes, you can look for Trends and patterns, Themes, Debates, conflicts and
contradictions, Gaps, etc.
6 Write your literature review (just like any other academic text: introduction,
main body, conclusion) and make sure to introduce key issues of your research
problem through the analyzing of your literature.
3.5. The Research Hypotheses
A hypothesis is a statement predicting how variables relate to each other and that can be tested
through research. Hypotheses are typically used in experimental designs and survey research
(Leavy, 2017: 69). Therefore, Qualitative research does NOT require hypotheses; it is also worth
mentioning that certain research projects require operationalizing Research Questions in form of
hypotheses.
4. Research Design
Research Design is a crucial task that follows right after defining the Research Problem, Purpose
statement, Questions, and Literature Review. Decisions regarding what, where, when, how much,
by what means concerning an inquiry or a research study are what constitute a research design.
Research design (RD) is the structure of any scientific work. It is the advance planning of the
methods to be adopted for collecting the relevant data and the techniques to be used in the analysis,
keeping in view the objectives of the research, time, money, and such factors involved. It is the
process that the investigator will follow from the start-up to completion of the study. Research
design can be thought of as the “glue” that holds all of the elements in a research project together.
A research design is not just a work plan. A work plan details what has to be done to complete the
project, but a research design ensures that the evidence obtained enables us to answer the initial
research questions in an unambiguous and convincing way. Research design is necessary because
it makes the smooth and logical sailing through the various research procedures possible.
The design decisions happen to be in respect of:
(i) What is the study about? (vii) What will be the sample design?
(ii) Why is the study being made? (viii) What techniques of data collection
(iii) Where will the study be carried out? will be used?
(iv) What type of data is required? (ix) How will the data be analyzed?
(v) Where can the required data be found? (x) In what style will the report be
(vi) What periods of time will the study prepared?
include?
Keeping in view the above stated design decisions, one may split the overall research design into
the following parts:
(a) the sampling design which deals with the method of selecting items to be observed for
the given study;
(b) the observational design which relates to the conditions under which the observations
are to be made;
(c) the statistical design which concerns with the question of how many items are to be
observed and how the information and data gathered are to be analyzed; and
(d) the operational design which deals with the techniques by which the procedures
specified in the sampling, statistical and observational designs can be carried out.
In brief, a good research design must, at least, contain—(a) a clear statement of the research
problem; (b) procedures and techniques to be used for gathering information; (c) the population
to be studied; and (d) methods to be used in processing and analyzing data.
3
This example is retrieved from:
https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/extraneous-variable
4.3. Sampling
When you conduct research about a group of people (e.g., a population), it’s rarely possible to
collect data from every person in that group. Instead, you select a sample. The sample is the group
of individuals who will actually participate in the research.
To draw valid conclusions from your results, you have to carefully decide how you will select a
sample that is representative of the group as a whole.
Depending on the theoretical framework and methodological approach of a particular study, data
can be collected by using different methods as we will see in the next sections.
6.2.1. A quotation
To cite a quote in APA, you always include the author’s last name, the year of publication,
and the page on which the quote can be found. The page number is preceded by “p.” (for a
single page) or “pp.” (for a page range).
EXAMPLE: PARENTHETICAL IN-TEXT CITATION FOR QUOTATIONS
A recent study of student plagiarism found that “plagiarism is often a matter of
confusion rather than deception” (Horváth & Kovács, 2020, p. 4).
Parenthetical Narrative
One author: (Harris, 2020) Harris (2020)
Two authors: (Harris & Cook, 2020) Harris and Cook (2020)
Three or more authors: (Harris et al., 2020) Harris et al. (2020)
N.B. In the rare case when “Anonymous” is specified as the author, treat it as if it
were a real name: (Anonymous, 2009). In the list of references, also use the name
“Anonymous” as author.
6.2.5.2. Unknown Date
When the date is unknown, use the abbreviation “n.d.” (for “no date”).
EXAMPLE: PARENTHETICAL IN-TEXT CITATION FOR UNKNOWN DATE
(Magnus, n.d.).
Parenthetical Narrative
Group author with
abbreviation:
First citation (National Institute of Mental National Institute of Mental
Health [NIMH], 2020) Health (NIMH, 2020)
Subsequent (NIMH, 2020) NIMH (2020)
citations
Group author (Stanford University, 2020) Stanford University (2020)
without abbreviation
Several studies have replicated these results (Brown, 2009; Porter, 2004; Smith,
2015).
References
Books
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological
Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative
and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.
Hacker, D., & Sommers, N. (2013). APA pocket style manual. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and
community-based participatory research approaches. The Guilford Press.
Walliman, N. (2011). Research methods: the basics. Routledge.
Articles
Online resources
Difference Between Research and Scientific Method
https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-research-and-vs-scientific-method/
Scientific Method https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scientific%20method
How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates
https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/literature-review/
Levels of Measurement | Nominal, Ordinal, Interval and Ratio
https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/levels-of-measurement
4 Levels of Measurement: Nominal, Ordinal, Interval & Ratio
https://careerfoundry.com/en/blog/data-analytics/data-levels-of-measurement/
How to Cite in APA Format (7th edition) | Guide & Generator
https://www.scribbr.com/category/apa-style/
APA 7th Edition (2020) | The 17 Most Notable Changes https://www.scribbr.com/apa-style/apa-
seventh-edition-changes/
How to Write a Problem Statement | Guide & Examples https://www.scribbr.com/research-
process/problem-statement/