There is no significant difference between the scores ANOVA

Ho:
of the three section on the science exam
There is a significant difference between the scores of Anova: Single Factor
Ha:
the three section on the science exam
SUMMARY
Section A Section B Section C Groups
84 74 94 Section A
94 94 81 Section B
90 84 90 Section C
94 84
97
ANOVA
Source of Variation
Between Groups
Within Groups

Total

Variable

Pre Module Score

Post Module Score

F = CV
F crit = TV

Conclusion

The scores of the three different

 Count Sum Average Variance
4 362 90.5 22.333333333
5 433 86.6 83.8
3 265 88.3333333333333 44.333333333

SS df MS F P-value F crit
33.8 2 16.8999999999999 0.3098601114 0.741071832682 4.256495
490.86666666667 9 54.5407407407407

524.66666666667 11

Significant Level Conputed Value Tabular Value (TV) Decision Interpretation

0.05 0.31 4.26 Accept Ho Not Significant

ores of the three different section has no significant relationship to each other
Ho: There is no sigficant difference between the medical cost and the
amount spent on alcohol

Ha: There is a sigficant difference between the medical cost and the
amount spent on alcohol

Amount spent on
Age Weight Medical Cost
alcohol
50 185 2100 200
42 200 2378 250
37 175 1657 100
54 225 2584 200
32 220 2658 250
REGRESSION

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.8618662662
R Square 0.7428134608
Adjusted R Square 0.6570846144
Standard Error 238.82573842
Observations 5

ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 494214 494214 8.664685132415 0.06033562825
Residual 3 171113.2 57037.733333
Total 4 665327.2

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%

Intercept 1127.4 404.3614334836 2.7880997213 0.06852706351 -159.45854999
X Variable 1 5.74 1.9500039886 2.9435837227 0.060335628251 -0.4657829888

RESIDUAL OUTPUT

Observation Predicted Y Residuals

1 2275.4 -175.4
2 2562.4 -184.4
3 1701.4 -44.4
4 2275.4 308.6
5 2562.4 95.6

Level of
Variable Significance F Decision Interpretation
Significance
Amount spent on
Alcohol 0.05 0.06 Accept Ho Not Significant
Medical Cost

Conclusion

The medical cost and the amount spent on alcohol have no

significant relationship
 Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
2414.25855 -159.45854999 2414.25855
11.945782989 -0.4657829888 11.945782989
Ho: There is no sigficant difference between the attiude and the
language spoken

Ha: There is a sigficant difference between the attiude and the

language spoken

OBSERVED FREQUENCY

Languages
Atittudes
Tagalog Ilocano Pampango Pangasinan Bicol
Positive 96 90 97 86 97
Negative 73 61 72 69 83
TOTAL 169 151 169 155 180

EXPECTED FREQUENCY

Languages
Atittudes
Tagalog Ilocano Pampango Pangasinan Bicol
Positive 95.58 85.40 95.58 87.66 101.80
Negative 73.42 65.60 73.42 67.34 78.20
TOTAL 169 151 169 155 180

CHI-SQUARE TABLE

o e o-e (o-e)^2 (o-e)^2/e DF

96 95.58 0.42 0.18 0.00 DF
73 73.42 -0.42 0.18 0.00 DF
90 85.4 4.6 21.16 0.25
61 65.6 -4.6 21.16 0.32
Variable
97 95.58 1.42 2.02 0.02
72 73.42 -1.42 2.02 0.03 Positive
86 87.66 -1.66 2.76 0.03 Negative
69 67.34 1.66 2.76 0.04
97 101.8 -4.8 23.04 0.23
Conclusion
83 78.2 4.8 23.04 0.29
Chi-square 1.22 The attitude of the person has no sigfica
spo
 TOTAL

466
358
824

TOTAL

466
358
824

(c-1)(r-1)
(4)(1)
4

Significant Level Computed Value Tabular Value (TV) Decision Interpretation

0.05 1.22 4 Accept Ho Not Significant

The attitude of the person has no sigficant difference on the language they have
spoken
 There is no significant difference between the effect
Ho: of module to the pre module score and post module
score of the students
There is a significant difference between the effect of
Ha: module to the pre module score and post module
score of the students

Pre Post
Students module Module
Score Score
1 18 22
2 21 25
3 16 17
4 22 24
5 19 16
6 24 29
7 17 20
8 21 23
9 23 19
10 18 20
11 14 15
12 16 15
13 16 18
14 19 26
15 18 18
16 20 24
17 12 18
18 22 25
19 15 19
20 17 16
T-test

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

Pre module Score Post Module Score

Mean 18.4 20.45
Variance 9.93684210526317 16.471052631579
Observations 20 20
Pearson Correlation 0.71747703985234
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 19
t Stat -3.23125266558031 CV
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.00219748299659
t Critical one-tail 1.72913281152137
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.00439496599319
t Critical two-tail 2.09302405440831 TV
 Tabular Value (TV) Decision Interpretation
Variable Significant Level Computed Value
Pre Module Score
0.05 2.09 3.23 Accept Ho Not Significant
Post Module Score

Conclusion

The effect of module has no significant difference in the pre module score and post module score of the students
score of the students