Theory Part 4
Theory Part 4
Social Constructivism, This theory assumes that understanding, significance, and meaning are
developed in coordination with other human beings (R.J Amineh & H.D Asl, 2015). According to
social constructivism, effective instruction and learning depend greatly on interpersonal contact
and conversation, with the main objective being the students' understanding of the discussion.
Social constructivism is based on the social interactions a student in the classroom along with a
personal critical thinking process (K.C. Powell & C.J. Kalina, 2009). The underlying
presuppositions of social constructivism also relate to reality, knowledge, and education. Reality
according to the first tenet of social constructivism, reality is created by human activity rather
than existing beforehand. Knowledge, People acquire knowledge through their interactions with
one another and their surroundings. Learning, effective learning happens when people connect
with one another and work together. The zone of proximal development (ZPD), a key concept in
Vygotsky's theory of social constructionism, highlights the importance of the teacher in a
student's learning. Social constructivism itself, address the importance of learning when it is
engaged you are able to interpret and comprehend, this allows you to gain knowledge more.
These discussions about learning liberate; they permit teachers to move beyond standards and
performance and concentrate on that which should be at the heart of the educational process:
learning and learners (P. Adams, 2006). Like Social Constructivism, mass media influences can
also have drawbacks with the lack of face-to-face contact, it lessens the student’s inability to
apprehend the surroundings.
George Siemens. “Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age”. Pressbooks. 2004.
https://pressbooks.pub/lidtfoundations/chapter/connectivism-a-learning-theory-for-
the-digital-age/
Betsy Duke, Ginger Harper, and Mark Johnston. “Connectivism as a Digital Age Learning Theory”.
Hetl. Pg. 4-81. 2013.
https://www.hetl.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/
HETLReview2013SpecialIssue.pdf#page=10
Dorothy C. Kropf. “Connectivism: 21st Century’s New Learning Theory”. Eric. V16 n2 p13-24.
2013.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1017519.pdf