Sjac 126
Sjac 126
Facial Surgery
Abstract
Background: Upper lip lift is achieved with a variety of techniques but many questions remain about the benefits and
drawbacks of each technique. The CUPID deep plane or modified upper lip lift procedure has recently been introduced to
help mitigate risk and optimize outcomes.
Objectives: The aims of this study were: (1) to better characterize and simplify the complex and artistic decision-making
process involved in upper lip lift and corner lip lift; (2) to present a mathematical guide to maintain the natural balance of
the upper lip, optimizing muscle function, and to indicate when to add a corner lift; and (3) to elucidate design elements,
aging, and future treatment considerations.
Methods: A PubMed (United States National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD) search was performed in October 2021 for all
journal articles published on upper lip lift and corner lip lifts. The search covered from 1950 to the present day in all languages
and without exclusion criteria. Outcomes and the evolution of deep plane upper lip lift design over the last 6 years were analyzed.
Results: By following the patterns demonstrated in over 2440 consecutive lip lifts, the authors have been better able to
understand the nuances involved in proper design that will avoid acceleration of aging and exaggeration of appearance,
and reduce the need for revision while maximizing results.
Conclusions: Upper lip lift design is more complex than most practitioners realize. The mathematical concept described
herein makes it possible to obtain more aesthetically pleasing and consistent outcomes. This novel approach to lip lift
design enables the practitioner to improve lip balance, facial harmony, and tooth show, and obtain adequate exposure of
the lateral vermillion.
Level of Evidence: 4
Editorial Decision date: May 6, 2022; online publish-ahead-of-print May 18, 2022.
Deep plane upper lip lift performed according to the CUPID technique, the popularity and demand for lip lifting as a
lip lift design described in this paper is a powerful pro- whole has increased substantially over the past 6 years for
cedure that has significant aesthetic impact. This simple both young and older patients.
surgery has the ability to restore youth, sensuality, and bal-
ance to the entire face with natural and reproducible re-
Dr Talei is a facial plastic surgeon in private practice, Beverly
sults, regardless of the patient’s gender, color, skin type, or Hills, CA, USA. Dr Pearlman is an associate clinical professor of
age.1 Upper lip lifting has been described in the literature otolaryngology/head and neck surgery, Columbia University, New
for 4 decades; 2 however, the majority of techniques have York, NY, USA.
a high rate of dissatisfaction. For this reason, the upper
Corresponding Author:
lip lift procedure has classically been reserved for older, Dr Benjamin Talei, 465 N Roxbury Drive, Suite 750, Beverly Hills, CA
lighter, thin-skinned patients with significant skin wrin- 90210, USA.
kles. Coincident with the development of the deep plane E-mail: [email protected]; Instagram: @drbentalei
1358 Aesthetic Surgery Journal 42(12)
Along with the rise in surgical numbers, we have also 3. Easy and proper mouth closure
noticed an increase in complications and revision surgery 4. A gentle slope along the vermillion border from medial
for procedures performed elsewhere. Although a substan- to lateral
tial percentage of secondary cases are performed to fix is- 5. Adequate exposure of the red vermillion along its en-
sues with scarring, a large subset is to treat asymmetry, lip tire length along with sufficient volume
imbalance, poor function, and an unnatural or exaggerated 6. Alleviation of angular depression or buried vermillion
appearance. Detailed descriptions of anatomy and func- at the corner of the mouth
tion with relation to aging and dentition are lacking. There 7. A smooth, continuous internal arc of the lip along the
is also a lack of consistency in nomenclature, adding to wet-dry border.
mouth closure in repose. Be aware that patients with ex- Subnasal upper lip lift should be avoided in patients with
cessive alveolar-dental prominence tend to age more rap- severe angular depression of the mouth, although corner
idly around the mouth. Gummy smiles are more common in lifting may be performed.
these patients although many factors must be considered Surgeons generally question the safety of performing
with regard to diagnosis and treatment.8 The deep plane an upper lip lift at the same time as a rhinoplasty. In most
upper lip lift commonly decreases the gummy smile by cases this is safe, and we advise making a classic subnasal
mitigating strain with smiling. Upon examination, a lower lip lift incision that is distinct and performed simultaneously
lip raising reflex may be noted in some patients when the with the classic midcolumellar rhinoplasty incision.10 Blood
upper lip is raised manually on examination. Over time, supply to all areas should be adequate unless multiple re-
A B
A B
Figure 3. (A) CPID designation for the RSTL globe: C, center; P, peak; I, intermediate; D, diagonal; O, outer. (B) The residual
CUPID measurements determine the final shape and slope of the vermillion border, shown on a 38-year-old female. A 2-mm
slope between P, I, and D provides a continuous line. Sharp or blunt Cupid’s troughs can be altered by making the C and P
lines equal in height. NLF, nasolabial fold; RSTL, relaxed skin tension line.
A B
Figure 4. Corner lift markings for Type I and Type II corner lifts on a 52-year-old female. The diagonal line marks the transition
from the subnasal to subfacial lip, which lacks support and is where the vermillion roll tapers off. (A) Type I corner lift utilizing
an elliptical excision to replace philtral skin with red vermillion. (B) Type II corner lift involves an inflection past the commissure
which effects a change to the lower lateral lip angulation and insertion, while lengthening the appearance of the upper lip.
Talei and Pearlman 1363
of the columella from the peak points of the incision; there- existing upward curve, this may result in a “Joker’s smile.”
fore, the heights of “C” and “P” should be roughly equal. A balanced, beautiful, and appealing commissure design
The excision height of “C” and “P” may be altered when is of utmost importance when maximizing lip lift results
reducing or enhancing the appearance of the Cupid’s bow. and avoiding exaggerated outcomes, while also avoiding
If more control of shape is required, the space between the worsening aging around the oral commissure. The upper
CPID lines may be divided in half and a 1-mm slope may be limb of the corner lift incision is typically drawn as a direct,
used between each marking. Maintenance or formation of straightline extension of the vermillion border beginning
this residual slope aids in maximizing vermillion exposure at the diagonal line. The outer “O” line may be used to de-
laterally and avoiding exaggeration with lip lifting. Lip types termine the height of excision of a Type II lift by keeping
depression and down-pull around the mouth, dimpling in broader extent than a narrow nose overlying a wider lip.
the depressor anguli oris region, rise of the point of the Figure 5A-D shows before-and-after photographs of 2 dif-
soft tissue pogonion, a deepened sulcus mentalis, and an ferent patients following a lip lift without application of a
overall sad or angry appearance. Unfortunately, dentists corner lift. The patient on the left had a larger discrepancy
and surgeons often overlook this dynamic when placing between the width of the nose and the mouth, resulting in
veneers and performing lip lifts, rendering the patient with a failure to expose the lateral lip.
labial incompetence which not only causes the aforemen-
tioned changes in appearance, but functionally may cause Step 3: Intermediate Line
xerostomia and deleterious changes in phonation. Once the “P” line and “D” line are determined, an inter-
A B
Figure 5. The need for corner lifting depends on the amount of subfacial lip lateral to the diagonal line and the discrepancy
between nasal width and labial width. (A) Before and (B) after photographs of a 50-year-old female patient with a narrower
nose and greater amount of buried vermilion lateral to the “D” line, showing an unsuccessful classic subnasal lip lift without
corner lift. (C) Before and (D) after photographs of a 52-year-old female patient with little nasolabial width discrepancy not
requiring a corner lift to obtain lateral vermillion exposure.
Table 1. Guideline for Skin Excision Markings and the Re- and commissure droop to a greater extent than the cen-
sultant Change in Tooth Show tral lip. The central lip is attached to a fixed structure in
Excise 4-5 mm 6 mm 7 mm 8 mm 9 mm 10 mm 11 mm
the midline—the nose—whereas the oral commissure is
attached to and hanging from the remainder of the face.
Show +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 This means that when a patient is supine, the surgeon may
note a greater correction on the lateral lip and mouth than
These numbers reflect the changes noted in medium-density skin types without
the use of muscle suspension. Excess temporary or permanent fillers may is occurring from the lip lift procedure.
change these numbers. This guideline only applies to deep plane lip lifting. In general, a 4- to 5-mm excision would reveal more of
the intraoral anatomy along with improved eversion and
dubbed “lagolabios.” The incisor display may easily in- accent of the upper lip without increasing incisor display
crease 4 to 8 mm or more when lying down and even to any appreciable extent. This is the range of excision
more when injected with anesthetic solution. More im- used in patients with adequate tooth show, pre-existing
portant is the effect of gravity on the commissure and the hypercontracture around the lower mouth, or a predispo-
lateral lip. With the patient sitting upright, the lateral lip sition to exaggerating their appearance with lifting. For
1366 Aesthetic Surgery Journal 42(12)
a 3-mm gap (horizontal) will result in a 6.3-mm vertical lift controlled differently and may demonstrate the opposite
rather than the 7 mm that would be achieved with a 7-mm dominance. In general, the dominant side of the face will
excision at the “C” line. This means that a 2-mm radial line have a stronger smile, possibly a nasal tip deviation to that
height difference will result in a final slope that is steady side, deeper nasolabial folds, and a higher chelion posi-
with a lift that is gradually diminishing as it approaches the tion. The opposite side tends to exhibit more drooping but
“I” and “D” lines and beyond. less shadowing. These differences are erroneously attrib-
The deep plane upper lip lift is akin to a centrally vec- uted to side preference during sleep. Soft tissue and bony
tored advancement flap. The lateral portions are pulled skeletal discrepancies, such as various forms of dental
superomedially rather than purely in a vertical vector. The malocclusion, open bite, retrognathia, prominent dentition,
lateral to the ala and the cheek is attached directly to the final “O” height between the lateral extension line and the
nose. There is a substantial risk of this occurring during re- top limb of the corner lift should be similar to the final “D”
vision surgery where the surgeon may attempt to excise a height (where D = O). The inflection limb should not extend
scar lateral to the ala. This can be avoided by transitioning into or past the nasolabial fold. More than this would be
at the “D2” point to a vertical limb ascending towards the uncommon with this form of corner lift design. The large
end of the alar crease. majority of corner lifts contain some inflection or Type II
extension.
Step 6: Corner Lifting
Direct lip lifts cutting along the central vermillion roll are Step 7: Vermillion Assessment
tension-free closure, effects of untoward tension may be weaker. The same phenomenon is also noted with other
noted months later. Laxity of the sill and nasal base may facial mimetic musculature such as the zygomaticus com-
be a congenital or iatrogenic phenomenon. Excess laxity is plex. If the lip is flaccid and excessively ptotic in the set-
very common following rhinoplasty and orthognathic sur- ting of orbicularis hypertrophy, a muscle plication can be
gery. The need for this is more common in rotated noses performed. Orbicularis muscle suspension is performed in
and nasal base types with weaker structure such as is seen roughly 25% of patients in our practices.
in Asian patients. Furthermore, the cephalic orbicularis in- It is important to note that muscle plication inherently
sertion line at the base of the nose tends to disinsert and fibroses and obliterates the function of the plicated por-
rotate out over time in a clockwise fashion on lateral view. tion of muscle and that this procedure should be per-
been equivocal. Typically, 5 units of Dysport (Galderma; patients are given valacyclovir, a skin flora oral antibi-
Lausanne, Switzerland) diluted with saline is injected into otic, and a steroid pack for recovery. Oral antibiotics are
the dermal-epidermal junction of the upper and lower flaps, not used. Antibiotic ointment is switched to Aquaphor
avoiding any intramuscular injection. This may mitigate (Beiersdorf Inc.; Hamburg, Germany) ointment after 3 days
the need for any postoperative modulation with CO2 or to avoid the rash formation seen with antibiotic oint-
5-fluorouracil (5-FU), which is rarely needed in the incision. ments. Patients return at Days 3 and 5 for suture removal.
Prolonged presence of sutures may result in hypopig-
mentation, striations, and delayed formation of epithelial
Intraoperative Adjuncts and bridges between upper and lower suture points.
A B
Figure 7. (A) Laterally biased revision in a 30-year-old male patient using the CUPID design to balance a laterally deficient
lip status post deep plane lip lift that was performed with classic design and uniform height of excision. (B) Laterally biased
revision on a 31-year-old female patient. The patient felt imbalanced status post classic design deep plane lip lift. The CUPID
design was used to gain more uniform exposure along the entire lip. The results are shown in Figure 8. (C) Revision lip lift
following subnasal lip lift by another surgeon on a 35-year-old female. The CUPID design was used with a lateral bias and
asymmetric excision to gain increased exposure, balance, and symmetry with minimal change in tooth show. (D) Revision lip lift
on a 35-year-old female patient for improved symmetry using the CUPID design on 1 side only. The original lift had removed
more from the left according to the patient, but failed to gain symmetry. A 2-mm slope was not obtained to minimize down-turn
of a bilateral revision.
November 2014 through September 2021. Patients were disproportion, and inadequate lifting. Several patients from
followed for a minimum of 3 months. No exclusion criteria other practices had their lips shifted off midline upon clo-
were used. Patients were primarily female (98%) and aged sure. Nasal base widening and ptosis was also common.
from 20 to 85 years old. Secondary surgeries, those per- Twenty-two patients had impaired lip mobility from pre-
formed initially by other surgeons, constituted 141 of these vious lip lifts that improved after performing a deep plane
cases (6%). In the primary author’s practice there were 23 release.
revisions of primary cases (1999 primary patients) contrib- Of the primary author’s own cases, only 2 were revised
uting to a 1% revision rate. Herpetic vesicular outbreak oc- to improve hypertrophic scarring on 1 side of the nose.
curred in 1 patient, hyperpigmentation in 2 patients, and The remainder of the primary author’s revision cases (21
dissatisfaction in 2 patients, both of whom were already cases) were performed to achieve a greater amount of
suffering from silicone hypertrophy and expected the lip lifting, better symmetry, or involved a corner lift to improve
volume to decrease. a lateral vermillion that had previously been inadequately
Revision patients from other practices were mostly treated before the addition of corner lifting and the CUPID
treated for scarring, asymmetry, exaggeration and lift design in the primary author’s practice. Patients who
1372 Aesthetic Surgery Journal 42(12)
A B C
Figure 8. Revision CUPID lift on the 31-year-old female patient shown in Figure 7. (A, D) Before photographs showing filler
excess. (B, E) After a classically designed, uniform excision deep plane lip lift. (C, F) After applying the CUPID lift design to
revise the classic lip lift performed by the primary author.
follow up regularly are routinely treated with CO2 laser Suspension of the SMAS to the pyriform ligament en-
over 2 appointments at 6 weeks and 12 weeks. Roughly sures a more stable lift with less risk of causing nasal sill or
5% of patients require more intervention with 5-FU or fur- alar base ptosis. We have also introduced novel portions
ther lasering. of the procedure to help prevent nasal base ptosis in sus-
The addition of the final slope calculations to the deep ceptible patients and to perform nasal base resuspension.
plane design along with incorporation of corner lifting Incorporation of the subnasal ravine and nasal base sus-
in most patients have led to substantially more impres- pension suture is a valuable and easily performed adjunct
sive and predictable results in primary and revision cases during lip lifting surgery. Deep plane lip lift and SMAS sus-
(Figure 7A-D). This article provides several examples of pension avoids the use of dermal sutures which may split
appropriate lip design resulting in comprehensive im- and cause hypertrophic or atrophic reactions along the in-
provement throughout the upper lip (Supplemental cision. Although the primary author has an international pa-
Figures 7-10). tient base, follow up was performed with nearly all patients
The deep plane upper lip lift addresses issues seen either in person or virtually with videoconferencing for a
with scarring, nasal base effacement, disproportion, and minimum of 3 months. The main limitation of this study is
overall failure of previous lip lift or bull’s horn techniques. the duration of follow up. The primary author has only been
The orbicularis muscle is separated from the SMAS-skin in practice 7 years and the design has evolved during this
flap and allowed to contract or redistribute evenly under time. With an international patient base, several patients
the flap advancement. Alternatively, the muscle may be were not followed past a 3-month virtual follow up.
shortened for further gain in dental show without substan- The CUPID lip design allows more uniform improve-
tial sacrifice. The deep plane dissection also allows the ments along the length of the entire lip, treating the
surgeon to address issues such as permanent injections subfacial as well as the subnasal lip. This technique also
and fillers. aids in the design of revision lip lift markings. The CUPID
Talei and Pearlman 1373
lift technique offers clear advantages over the prior deep and Reconstructive Surgery. Butterworth-Heinemann;
plane design1 and alternative lip lift techniques involving 1971: 1127–1129.
endonasal incisions18 which may not have the ability to 3. Penna V, Fricke A, Iblher N, Eisenhardt SU, Stark GB.
shape the upper lip and control the slope, curvature, and The attractive lip: a photomorphometric analysis. J Plast
shape of the vermillion border. The benefits of the CUPID Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(7):920-929. doi: 10.1016/j.
bjps.2015.03.013
lift design are clearly demonstrated in a photograph of a
4. Kar M, Muluk NB, Bafaqeeh SA, Cingi C. Is it possible
patient who initially received a deep plane upper lip lift to define the ideal lips? Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital.
followed 2 years later by a revision with the CUPID lift 2018;38(1):67-72. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1511
design (Figures 7B, 8A-F). The aim is to create a central 5. Ramaut L, Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Verstraete K, Blondeel P.