Scribd
Upload
1K views3 pages

Ram Setu Order

This document summarizes the proceedings of a Supreme Court of India hearing regarding a petition related to Ram Setu. 1) The petition sought orders declaring Ram Setu a national monument and engaging agencies to conduct surveys. 2) The Solicitor General informed the court that the process is underway in the Ministry of Culture. 3) The petitioner was given two weeks to submit additional material, and the court will be apprised of the Ministry's decision. 4) The interim application was disposed of at this stage, with liberty for the petitioner to pursue remedies if the grievance persists.

Uploaded by

PGurus
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
1K views3 pages

Ram Setu Order

This document summarizes the proceedings of a Supreme Court of India hearing regarding a petition related to Ram Setu. 1) The petition sought orders declaring Ram Setu a national monument and engaging agencies to conduct surveys. 2) The Solicitor General informed the court that the process is underway in the Ministry of Culture. 3) The petitioner was given two weeks to submit additional material, and the court will be apprised of the Ministry's decision. 4) The interim application was disposed of at this stage, with liberty for the petitioner to pursue remedies if the grievance persists.

Uploaded by

PGurus
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
You are on page 1/ 3

SLP C 20758/2005

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.1 SECTION XII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.20758/2005

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-12-2004


in WP No.33528/2004 17-12-2004 in WP No. 34436/2004 passed by the
High Court of Judicature at Madras)

O. FERNANDES(DEAD) Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

T.N.P.C.B. AND ORS. REP. BY CHAIRMAN Respondent(s)

WITH T.C.(C) No.27/2007 (XVI-A)


(With IA No.88228/2019 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS)

Date : 19-01-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA

For Petitioner(s)
Ms. Sridevi Panikkar, AOR

Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran, AOR

TC(C) 27/2007 Dr. Subramanian Swamy, Petitioner-in-person


Mr. Satya Sabharwal, Adv.
Mr. Vishesh Kanodia, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG


Signature Not Verified
Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG
Digitally signed by
CHETAN KUMAR
Date: 2023.01.20
16:08:09 IST
Reason:
SLP C 20758/2005
2

Mrs. Aishwarya Bhati, ASG


Mrs. Sonia Mathur, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Wasim A Qadri, Sr. Adv.
Mrs. Bani Dikshit, Adv.
Mrs. Swati Ghildiyal, Adv.
Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR

Mrs. C. Rubavathi, Adv.


Mr. C. Raghavendren, Adv.
Mr. M. Veeraragavan, Adv.
Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv.
Mr. M.A. Chinnasamy, AOR

Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR

Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR

Mr. D.S. Mehra, AOR

Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following


O R D E R

IA No 88228/2019 In TC (Civil) No 27/2017

1 The relief which has been sought in the Interlocutory Application is in the
following terms:

“a) That this Hon 'ble Court passes orders and directs Union
of India along with National Monuments Authority (NMA)
to declare Ram-Setu as a National Monument and of
National Importance.

b) That this Hon'ble Court passes orders and directs Union of


India to engage Geological Survey of India& Archeological
Survey of India to conduct a detailed-survey in respect to
Ram-Setu as an Ancient Monument of National
Importance.

c) That this Hon 'ble Court passes orders and directs Union
of India with respect to Section 16 of the act to protect
SLP C 20758/2005
3

the said Ancient Monument of National Importance as a


place of worship from any misuse, pollution or
desecration.”

2 We have heard Dr Subramanian Swamy, who appears in person and Mr


Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General of India for the Union of India.

3 The Solicitor General states that the process is currently under way in the
Ministry of Culture, but if the petitioner would so desire, he may also submit
any additional material or communication as he may wish within a period of
two weeks.

4 The Court may be apprised of the decision taken.

5 The Interlocutory Application is disposed of at this stage, with liberty to the


applicant to seek recourse to his remedies if the grievance will subsists.

(CHETAN KUMAR) (KAMLESH RAWAT)


A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

You might also like