How To Write Common Types of Essays
How To Write Common Types of Essays
Argumentative essays are by far the most common type of essay to write at university.
Example: Two-sided argumentative essay prompt Has the rise of the internet had a net positive or negative
impact on education? Support your argument with evidence.
The prompt may also be more open-ended in terms of the possible arguments you could make.
Example: Open argumentative essay prompt What is the greatest challenge facing young people today?
In this context, you won’t necessarily be told to write an argumentative essay—but making an
evidence-based argument is an essential goal of most academic writing, and this should be your
default approach unless you’re told otherwise.
Your research should lead you to develop a specific position on the topic. The essay then argues for
that position and aims to convince the reader by presenting your evidence, evaluation and analysis.
There are many possible approaches to argumentative essays, but there are two common models
that can help you start outlining your arguments: The Toulmin model and the Rogerian model.
Toulmin arguments
The Toulmin model consists of four steps, which may be repeated as many times as necessary for
the argument:
1. Make a claim
2. Provide the grounds (evidence) for the claim
3. Explain the warrant (how the grounds support the claim)
4. Discuss possible rebuttals to the claim, identifying the limits of the argument and showing that you
have considered alternative perspectives
The Toulmin model is a common approach in academic essays. You don’t have to use these specific
terms (grounds, warrants, rebuttals), but establishing a clear connection between your claims and
the evidence supporting them is crucial in an argumentative essay.
Say you’re making an argument about the effectiveness of workplace anti-discrimination measures.
You might:
1. Claim that unconscious bias training does not have the desired results, and resources would be
better spent on other approaches
2. Cite data to support your claim
3. Explain how the data indicates that the method is ineffective
4. Anticipate objections to your claim based on other data, indicating whether these objections are
valid, and if not, why not.
Rogerian arguments
The Rogerian model also consists of four steps you might repeat throughout your essay:
1. Discuss what the opposing position gets right and why people might hold this position
2. Highlight the problems with this position
3. Present your own position, showing how it addresses these problems
4. Suggest a possible compromise—what elements of your position would proponents of the
opposing position benefit from adopting?
This model builds up a clear picture of both sides of an argument and seeks a compromise. It is
particularly useful when people tend to disagree strongly on the issue discussed, allowing you to
approach opposing arguments in good faith.
Say you want to argue that the internet has had a positive impact on education. You might:
You don’t necessarily have to pick one of these models—you may even use elements of both in
different parts of your essay—but it’s worth considering them if you struggle to structure your
arguments.
Regardless of which approach you take, your essay should always be structured using
an introduction, a body, and a conclusion.
Hover over different parts of the example below to see how a typical introduction works.
Introduction
The spread of the internet has had a world-changing effect, not least on the world of education. The
use of the internet in academic contexts is on the rise, and its role in learning is hotly debated. For
many teachers who did not grow up with this technology, its effects seem alarming and potentially
harmful. This concern, while understandable, is misguided. The negatives of internet use are
outweighed by its critical benefits for students and educators—as a uniquely comprehensive and
accessible information source; a means of exposure to and engagement with different perspectives;
and a highly flexible learning environment.
In the standard five-paragraph format for short essays, the body takes up three of your five
paragraphs. In longer essays, it will be more paragraphs, and might be divided into
sections with headings.
Each paragraph covers its own topic, introduced with a topic sentence. Each of these
topics must contribute to your overall argument; don’t include irrelevant information.
This example paragraph takes a Rogerian approach: It first acknowledges the merits of the
opposing position and then highlights problems with that position.
Hover over different parts of the example to see how a body paragraph is constructed.
Body
A common frustration for teachers is students’ use of Wikipedia as a source in their writing. Its
prevalence among students is not exaggerated; a survey found that the vast majority of the students
surveyed used Wikipedia (Head & Eisenberg, 2010). An article in The Guardian stresses a common
objection to its use: “a reliance on Wikipedia can discourage students from engaging with genuine
academic writing” (Coomer, 2013). Teachers are clearly not mistaken in viewing Wikipedia usage
as ubiquitous among their students; but the claim that it discourages engagement with academic
sources requires further investigation. This point is treated as self-evident by many teachers, but
Wikipedia itself explicitly encourages students to look into other sources. Its articles often provide
references to academic publications and include warning notes where citations are missing; the
site’s own guidelines for research make clear that it should be used as a starting point, emphasizing
that users should always “read the references and check whether they really do support what the
article says” (“Wikipedia:Researching with Wikipedia,” 2020). Indeed, for many students,
Wikipedia is their first encounter with the concepts of citation and referencing. The use of
Wikipedia therefore has a positive side that merits deeper consideration than it often receives.
No new arguments or evidence appear here, but in longer essays you may discuss the
strengths and weaknesses of your argument and suggest topics for future research. In all
conclusions, you should stress the relevance and importance of your argument.
Hover over the following example to see the typical elements of a conclusion.
Conclusion
The internet has had a major positive impact on the world of education; occasional pitfalls aside, its
value is evident in numerous applications. The future of teaching lies in the possibilities the internet
opens up for communication, research, and interactivity. As the popularity of distance learning
shows, students value the flexibility and accessibility offered by digital education, and educators
should fully embrace these advantages. The internet’s dangers, real and imaginary, have been
documented exhaustively by skeptics, but the internet is here to stay; it is time to focus seriously on
its potential for good.
Expository essays are usually short assignments intended to test your composition skills or your
understanding of a subject. They tend to involve less research and original arguments
than argumentative essays.
Sometimes it won’t be directly stated that the assignment is an expository essay, but there are
certain keywords that imply expository writing is required. Consider the prompts below.
Explain how the invention of the printing press changed European society in the 15th century.
The word “explain” here is the clue: An essay responding to this prompt should provide an
explanation of this historical process—not necessarily an original argument about it.
The structure of your expository essay will vary according to the scope of your assignment and the
demands of your topic. It’s worthwhile to plan out your structure before you start, using an essay
outline.
A common structure for a short expository essay consists of five paragraphs: An introduction, three
body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
Hover over different parts of the example below to see how a typical introduction works.
In many ways, the invention of the printing press marked the end of the Middle Ages. The medieval
period in Europe is often remembered as a time of intellectual and political stagnation. Prior to the
Renaissance, the average person had very limited access to books and was unlikely to be
literate. The invention of the printing press in the 15th century allowed for much less restricted
circulation of information in Europe, paving the way for the Reformation.
It’s important to make sure each paragraph covers its own clearly defined topic, introduced
with a topic sentence. Different topics (all related to the overall subject matter of the essay)
should be presented in a logical order, with clear transitions between paragraphs.
Hover over different parts of the example paragraph below to see how a body paragraph is
constructed.
The invention of the printing press in 1440 changed this situation dramatically. Johannes
Gutenberg, who had worked as a goldsmith, used his knowledge of metals in the design of the
press. He made his type from an alloy of lead, tin, and antimony, whose durability allowed for the
reliable production of high-quality books. This new technology allowed texts to be reproduced and
disseminated on a much larger scale than was previously possible. The Gutenberg Bible appeared in
the 1450s, and a large number of printing presses sprang up across the continent in the following
decades. Gutenberg’s invention rapidly transformed cultural production in Europe; among other
things, it would lead to the Protestant Reformation.
Hover over different parts of the example below to see how a conclusion works.
The invention of the printing press was important not only in terms of its immediate cultural and
economic effects, but also in terms of its major impact on politics and religion across Europe. In the
century following the invention of the printing press, the relatively stationary intellectual
atmosphere of the Middle Ages gave way to the social upheavals of the Reformation and the
Renaissance. A single technological innovation had contributed to the total reshaping of the
continent.
Narrative essays test your ability to express your experiences in a creative and compelling way, and
to follow an appropriate narrative structure. They are often assigned in high school or in
composition classes at university. You can also use these techniques when writing a personal
statement for an application.
A narrative essay is a way of testing your ability to tell a story in a clear and interesting way.
You’re expected to think about where your story begins and ends, and how to convey it with eye-
catching language and a satisfying pace.
These skills are quite different from those needed for formal academic writing. For instance, in a
narrative essay the use of the first person (“I”) is encouraged, as is the use of figurative language,
dialogue, and suspense.
Choosing a topic
Narrative essay assignments vary widely in the amount of direction you’re given about your topic.
You may be assigned quite a specific topic or choice of topics to work with.
Specific prompts
You may also be given prompts that leave you a much wider choice of topic.
Open-ended prompts
In these cases, you might have to think harder to decide what story you want to tell. The best kind
of story for a narrative essay is one you can use to talk about a particular theme or lesson, or that
takes a surprising turn somewhere along the way.
For example, a trip where everything went according to plan makes for a less interesting story than
one where something unexpected happened that you then had to respond to. Choose an experience
that might surprise the reader or teach them something.
For example, this application prompt from Common App requires you to respond with a narrative
essay.
College application prompt Recount a time when you faced a challenge, setback, or failure. How did it
affect you, and what did you learn from the experience?
In this context, choose a story that is not only interesting but also expresses the qualities the prompt
is looking for—here, resilience and the ability to learn from failure—and frame the story in a way
that emphasizes these qualities.
Hover over different parts of the text to see how the structure works.
Development
These sentences express in more detail how the class differed from the author’s expectations. The
two sentences beginning with “To talk” are similarly constructed, creating a rhetorical effect through
repetition. The final sentence summarizes the effect this had on the author.
Since elementary school, I have always favored subjects like science and math over the humanities.
My instinct was always to think of these subjects as more solid and serious than classes like
English. If there was no right answer, I thought, why bother? But recently I had an experience that
taught me my academic interests are more flexible than I had thought: I took my first philosophy
class.
Before I entered the classroom, I was skeptical. I waited outside with the other students and
wondered what exactly philosophy would involve—I really had no idea. I imagined something
pretty abstract: long, stilted conversations pondering the meaning of life. But what I got was
something quite different.
A young man in jeans, Mr. Jones—“but you can call me Rob”—was far from the white-haired,
buttoned-up old man I had half-expected. And rather than pulling us into pedantic arguments about
obscure philosophical points, Rob engaged us on our level. To talk free will, we looked at our own
choices. To talk ethics, we looked at dilemmas we had faced ourselves. By the end of class, I’d
discovered that questions with no right answer can turn out to be the most interesting ones.
The experience has taught me to look at things a little more “philosophically”—and not just because
it was a philosophy class! I learned that if I let go of my preconceptions, I can actually get a lot out
of subjects I was previously dismissive of. The class taught me—in more ways than one—to look at
things with an open mind.
Descriptive essays test your ability to use language in an original and creative way, to convey to the
reader a memorable image of whatever you are describing. They are commonly assigned as writing
exercises at high school and in composition classes.
You might also be asked to describe something outside your own experience, in which case you’ll
have to use your imagination.
If you’re not given a specific prompt, try to think of something you feel confident describing in
detail. Think of objects and places you know well, that provoke specific feelings or sensations, and
that you can describe in an interesting way.
This tells us something about the place, but it’s a bit too literal and not likely to be memorable.
If we want to make the description more likely to stick in the reader’s mind, we can use some
figurative language.
Figurative description Small groves are dotted across the face of the park like a patchy beard.
Here we have used a simile to compare the park to a face and the trees to facial hair. This is
memorable because it’s not what the reader expects; it makes them look at the park from a different
angle.
You don’t have to fill every sentence with figurative language, but using these devices in an
original way at various points throughout your essay will keep the reader engaged and convey your
unique perspective on your subject.
Sensory details I feel the bonfire’s heat on my face, and smell the rich smoke filling the air.
Obviously not all senses will apply to every subject, but it’s always a good idea to explore what’s
interesting about your subject beyond just what it looks like.
Even when your subject is more abstract, you might find a way to incorporate the senses more
metaphorically, as in this descriptive essay about fear.
Sensory details used metaphoricallyFear is the smell of sweat, and the feeling you can’t breathe.
It’s easy to end up using clichéd phrases—“cold as ice,” “free as a bird”—but try to reflect further
and make more precise, original word choices. Clichés provide conventional ways of describing
things, but they don’t tell the reader anything about your unique perspective on what you’re
describing.
Try looking over your sentences to find places where a different word would convey your
impression more precisely or vividly. Using a thesaurus can help you find alternative word choices.
My cat runs across the garden quickly and jumps onto the fence to watch it from above.
My cat crosses the garden nimbly and leaps onto the fence to survey it from above.
However, exercise care in your choices; don’t just look for the most impressive-looking synonym
you can find for every word. Overuse of a thesaurus can result in ridiculous sentences like this one:
My feline perambulates the allotment proficiently and capers atop the palisade to regard it from
aloft.
Hover over different parts of the text to see how a descriptive essay works.
On Sunday afternoons I like to spend my time in the garden behind my house. The garden is narrow
but long, a corridor of green extending from the back of the house, and I sit on a lawn chair at the
far end to read and relax. I am in my small peaceful paradise: the shade of the tree, the feel of the
grass on my feet, the gentle activity of the fish in the pond beside me.
My cat crosses the garden nimbly and leaps onto the fence to survey it from above. From his perch
he can watch over his little kingdom and keep an eye on the neighbours. He does this until the
barking of next door’s dog scares him from his post and he bolts for the cat flap to govern from the
safety of the kitchen.
With that, I am left alone with the fish, whose whole world is the pond by my feet. The fish explore
the pond every day as if for the first time, prodding and inspecting every stone. I sometimes feel the
same about sitting here in the garden; I know the place better than anyone, but whenever I return I
still feel compelled to pay attention to all its details and novelties—a new bird perched in the tree,
the growth of the grass, and the movement of the insects it shelters…
Sitting out in the garden, I feel serene. I feel at home. And yet I always feel there is more to
discover. The bounds of my garden may be small, but there is a whole world contained within it,
and it is one I will never get tired of inhabiting.
Let’s say your research involves the competing psychological approaches of behaviorism
and cognitive psychology. You might make a table to summarize the key differences
between them.
Dominant from the 1920s to the 1950s Rose to prominence in the 1960s
Focuses on how thinking is affected by conditioning and environment Focuses on the cognitive processes themse
Or say you’re writing about the major global conflicts of the twentieth century. You might
visualize the key similarities and differences in a Venn diagram.
These visualizations wouldn’t make it into your actual writing, so they don’t have to be very
formal in terms of phrasing or presentation. The point of comparing and contrasting at this
stage is to help you organize and shape your ideas to aid you in structuring your
arguments.
Point of comparison A
o Subject 1
o Subject 2
Point of comparison B
o Subject 1
o Subject 2
Mouse over the example paragraph below to see how this approach works.
One challenge teachers face is identifying and assisting students who are struggling without
disrupting the rest of the class. In a traditional classroom environment, the teacher can easily
identify when a student is struggling based on their demeanor in class or simply by regularly
checking on students during exercises. They can then offer assistance quietly during the exercise or
discuss it further after class. Meanwhile, in a Zoom-based class, the lack of physical presence
makes it more difficult to pay attention to individual students’ responses and notice frustrations, and
there is less flexibility to speak with students privately to offer assistance. In this case, therefore, the
traditional classroom environment holds the advantage, although it appears likely that aiding
students in a virtual classroom environment will become easier as the technology, and teachers’
familiarity with it, improves.
Subject 1
o Point of comparison A
o Point of comparison B
Subject 2
o Point of comparison A
o Point of comparison B
Mouse over the example paragraph below to see how this approach works.
The most commonly cited advantage of distance learning is the flexibility and accessibility it
offers. Rather than being required to travel to a specific location every week (and to live near
enough to feasibly do so), students can participate from anywhere with an internet connection. This
allows not only for a wider geographical spread of students but for the possibility of studying while
travelling. However, distance learning presents its own accessibility challenges; not all students
have a stable internet connection and a computer or other device with which to participate in online
classes, and less technologically literate students and teachers may struggle with the technical
aspects of class participation. Furthermore, discomfort and distractions can hinder an individual
student’s ability to engage with the class from home, creating divergent learning experiences for
different students. Distance learning, then, seems to improve accessibility in some ways while
representing a step backwards in others.
Note that these two methods can be combined; these two example paragraphs could both
be part of the same essay, but it’s wise to use an essay outline to plan out which approach
you’re taking in each paragraph.
A literary analysis essay is not a rhetorical analysis, nor is it just a summary of the plot or a book
review. Instead, it is a type of argumentative essay where you need to analyze elements such as the
language, perspective, and structure of the text, and explain how the author uses literary devices to
create effects and convey ideas.
Before beginning a literary analysis essay, it’s essential to carefully read the text and come up with
a thesis statement to keep your essay focused. As you write, follow the standard structure of
an academic essay:
1. An introduction that tells the reader what your essay will focus on.
2. A main body, divided into paragraphs, that builds an argument using evidence from the text.
3. A conclusion that clearly states the main point that you have shown with your analysis.
Your goal in literary analysis is not simply to explain the events described in the text, but to analyze
the writing itself and discuss how the text works on a deeper level. Primarily, you’re looking out
for literary devices—textual elements that writers use to convey meaning and create effects. If
you’re comparing and contrasting multiple texts, you can also look for connections between
different texts.
To get started with your analysis, there are several key areas that you can focus on. As you analyze
each aspect of the text, try to think about how they all relate to each other. You can use highlights or
notes to keep track of important passages and quotes.
Language choices
Consider what style of language the author uses. Are the sentences short and simple or more
complex and poetic?
What word choices stand out as interesting or unusual? Are words used figuratively to mean
something other than their literal definition? Figurative language includes things
like metaphor (e.g. “her eyes were oceans”) and simile (e.g. “her eyes were like oceans”).
Also keep an eye out for imagery in the text—recurring images that create a certain atmosphere or
symbolize something important. Remember that language is used in literary texts to say more than it
means on the surface.
Narrative voice
Ask yourself:
The tone of the text is also worth considering. Is the story intended to be comic, tragic, or
something else? Are usually serious topics treated as funny, or vice versa? Is the story realistic or
fantastical (or somewhere in between)?
Structure
Consider how the text is structured, and how the structure relates to the story being told.
Think about why the author chose to divide the different parts of the text in the way they did.
There are also less formal structural elements to take into account. Does the story unfold in
chronological order, or does it jump back and forth in time? Does it begin in medias res—in the
middle of the action? Does the plot advance towards a clearly defined climax?
With poetry, consider how the rhyme and meter shape your understanding of the text and your
impression of the tone. Try reading the poem aloud to get a sense of this.
In a play, you might consider how relationships between characters are built up through different
scenes, and how the setting relates to the action. Watch out for dramatic irony, where the audience
knows some detail that the characters don’t, creating a double meaning in their words, thoughts, or
actions.
If you’re given a prompt for your essay, your thesis must answer or relate to the prompt. For
example:
Your thesis should be something arguable—that is, something that you think is true about the text,
but which is not a simple matter of fact. It must be complex enough to develop through evidence
and arguments across the course of your essay.
Say you’re analyzing the novel Frankenstein. You could start by asking yourself:
It can be useful to comb through the text in search of relevant quotations before you start writing.
You might not end up using everything you find, and you may have to return to the text for more
evidence as you write, but collecting textual evidence from the beginning will help you to structure
your arguments and assess whether they’re convincing.
The title
Your title should clearly indicate what your analysis will focus on. It usually contains the
name of the author and text(s) you’re analyzing. Keep it as concise and engaging as
possible.
A common approach to the title is to use a relevant quote from the text, followed by a
colon and then the rest of your title.
If you struggle to come up with a good title at first, don’t worry—this will be easier once
you’ve begun writing the essay and have a better sense of your arguments.
The introduction
The essay introduction provides a quick overview of where your argument is going. It
should include your thesis statement and a summary of the essay’s structure.
A typical structure for an introduction is to begin with a general statement about the text
and author, using this to lead into your thesis statement. You might refer to a commonly
held idea about the text and show how your thesis will contradict it, or zoom in on a
particular device you intend to focus on.
Then you can end with a brief indication of what’s coming up in the main body of the
essay. This is called signposting. It will be more elaborate in longer essays, but in a short
five-paragraph essay structure, it shouldn’t be more than one sentence.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is often read as a crude cautionary tale about the dangers of scientific
advancement unrestrained by ethical considerations. In this reading, protagonist Victor Frankenstein
is a stable representation of the callous ambition of modern science throughout the novel. This
essay, however, argues that far from providing a stable image of the character, Shelley uses shifting
narrative perspectives to portray Frankenstein in an increasingly negative light as the novel goes on.
While he initially appears to be a naive but sympathetic idealist, after the creature’s narrative
Frankenstein begins to resemble—even in his own telling—the thoughtlessly cruel figure the
creature represents him as. This essay begins by exploring the positive portrayal of Frankenstein in
the first volume, then moves on to the creature’s perception of him, and finally discusses the third
volume’s narrative shift toward viewing Frankenstein as the creature views him.
Some students prefer to write the introduction later in the process, and it’s not a bad idea.
After all, you’ll have a clearer idea of the overall shape of your arguments once you’ve
begun writing them!
If you do write the introduction first, you should still return to it later to make sure it lines up
with what you ended up writing, and edit as necessary.
Paragraph structure
A typical structure for a high school literary analysis essay consists of five paragraphs: the
three paragraphs of the body, plus the introduction and conclusion.
Each paragraph in the main body should focus on one topic. In the five-paragraph model,
try to divide your argument into three main areas of analysis, all linked to your thesis. Don’t
try to include everything you can think of to say about the text—only analysis that drives
your argument.
In longer essays, the same principle applies on a broader scale. For example, you might
have two or three sections in your main body, each with multiple paragraphs. Within these
sections, you still want to begin new paragraphs at logical moments—a turn in the
argument or the introduction of a new idea.
Robert’s first encounter with Gil-Martin suggests something of his sinister power. Robert feels “a
sort of invisible power that drew me towards him.” He identifies the moment of their meeting as
“the beginning of a series of adventures which has puzzled myself, and will puzzle the world when I
am no more in it” (p. 89). Gil-Martin’s “invisible power” seems to be at work even at this distance
from the moment described; before continuing the story, Robert feels compelled to anticipate at
length what readers will make of his narrative after his approaching death. With this interjection,
Hogg emphasizes the fatal influence Gil-Martin exercises from his first appearance.
Topic sentences
To keep your points focused, it’s important to use a topic sentence at the beginning of
each paragraph.
A good topic sentence allows a reader to see at a glance what the paragraph is about. It
can introduce a new line of argument and connect or contrast it with the previous
paragraph. Transition words like “however” or “moreover” are useful for creating smooth
transitions:
… The story’s focus, therefore, is not upon the divine revelation that may be waiting
beyond the door, but upon the mundane process of aging undergone by the man as he
waits.
Nevertheless, the “radiance” that appears to stream from the door is typically treated as
religious symbolism.
This topic sentence signals that the paragraph will address the question of religious
symbolism, while the linking word “nevertheless” points out a contrast with the previous
paragraph’s conclusion.
It’s important to contextualize quotes and explain why you’re using them; they should be
properly introduced and analyzed, not treated as self-explanatory:
Blake asks “What dread hand” could have created the tiger, subverting the usual sense of joy in
God’s creation and conveying instead a sense of fearful awe.
It isn’t always necessary to use a quote. Quoting is useful when you’re discussing the
author’s language, but sometimes you’ll have to refer to plot points or structural elements
that can’t be captured in a short quote.
In these cases, it’s more appropriate to paraphrase or summarize parts of the text—that is,
to describe the relevant part in your own words:
The initial and final sections of the novel consist of Walton’s letters to his sister, and it is significant
that the entirety of Frankenstein’s and the creature’s narratives are ostensibly transcribed by
Walton in these letters.
A good way to approach this is to briefly summarize your key arguments, and then stress
the conclusion they’ve led you to, highlighting the new perspective your thesis provides on
the text as a whole:
Logos, or the logical appeal, refers to the use of reasoned argument to persuade. This is the
dominant approach in academic writing, where arguments are built up using reasoning and
evidence.
Ethos, or the ethical appeal, involves the author presenting themselves as an authority on their
subject. For example, someone making a moral argument might highlight their own morally
admirable behavior; someone speaking about a technical subject might present themselves as an
expert by mentioning their qualifications.
Pathos, or the pathetic appeal, evokes the audience’s emotions. This might involve speaking in a
passionate way, employing vivid imagery, or trying to provoke anger, sympathy, or any other
emotional response in the audience.
These three appeals are all treated as integral parts of rhetoric, and a given author may combine all
three of them to convince their audience.
The context is everything surrounding the text: Who is the author (or speaker, designer, etc.)? Who
is their (intended or actual) audience? When and where was the text produced, and for what
purpose?
Looking at the context can help to inform your rhetorical analysis. For example, Martin Luther
King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech has universal power, but the context of the civil rights
movement is an important part of understanding why.
A claim is the fact or idea the author wants to convince the reader of. An argument might center on
a single claim, or be built up out of many. Claims are usually explicitly stated, but they may also
just be implied in some kinds of text.
The author uses supports to back up each claim they make. These might range from hard evidence
to emotional appeals—anything that is used to convince the reader to accept a claim.
The warrant is the logic or assumption that connects a support with a claim. Outside of quite
formal argumentation, the warrant is often unstated—the author assumes their audience will
understand the connection without it. But that doesn’t mean you can’t still explore the implicit
warrant in these cases.
Rhetorical statementNeither candidate was well liked; voter turnout in the election was very low.
We can see a claim and a support here, but the warrant is implicit. Here, the warrant is the
assumption that more likeable candidates would have inspired greater turnout. We might be more or
less convinced by the argument depending on whether we think this is a fair assumption.
By asking these questions, you’ll discover the various rhetorical devices the text uses. Don’t feel
that you have to cram in every rhetorical term you know—focus on those that are most important to
the text.
The following sections show how to write the different parts of a rhetorical analysis.
Introducing your rhetorical analysis
Like all essays, a rhetorical analysis begins with an introduction. The introduction tells
readers what text you’ll be discussing, provides relevant background information, and
presents your thesis statement.
Hover over different parts of the example below to see how an introduction works.
Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech is widely regarded as one of the most important
pieces of oratory in American history. Delivered in 1963 to thousands of civil rights activists
outside the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., the speech has come to symbolize the spirit of
the civil rights movement and even to function as a major part of the American national myth. This
rhetorical analysis argues that King’s assumption of the prophetic voice, amplified by the historic
size of his audience, creates a powerful sense of ethos that has retained its inspirational power over
the years.
Each paragraph should focus on a different element of the text, and they should all
contribute to your overall argument for your thesis statement.
Hover over the example to explore how a typical body paragraph is constructed.
King’s speech is infused with prophetic language throughout. Even before the famous “dream” part
of the speech, King’s language consistently strikes a prophetic tone. He refers to the Lincoln
Memorial as a “hallowed spot” and speaks of rising “from the dark and desolate valley of
segregation” to “make justice a reality for all of God’s children.” The assumption of this prophetic
voice constitutes the text’s strongest ethical appeal; after linking himself with political figures like
Lincoln and the Founding Fathers, King’s ethos adopts a distinctly religious tone, recalling Biblical
prophets and preachers of change from across history. This adds significant force to his words;
standing before an audience of hundreds of thousands, he states not just what the future should be,
but what it will be: “The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation
until the bright day of justice emerges.” This warning is almost apocalyptic in tone, though it
concludes with the positive image of the “bright day of justice.” The power of King’s rhetoric thus
stems not only from the pathos of his vision of a brighter future, but from the ethos of the prophetic
voice he adopts in expressing this vision.
It is clear from this analysis that the effectiveness of King’s rhetoric stems less from the pathetic
appeal of his utopian “dream” than it does from the ethos he carefully constructs to give force to his
statements. By framing contemporary upheavals as part of a prophecy whose fulfillment will result
in the better future he imagines, King ensures not only the effectiveness of his words in the moment
but their continuing resonance today. Even if we have not yet achieved King’s dream, we cannot
deny the role his words played in setting us on the path toward it.
To write a successful personal statement for a graduate school application, don’t just summarize
your experience; instead, craft a focused narrative in your own voice. Aim to demonstrate three
things:
This article guides you through some winning strategies to build a strong, well-structured personal
statement for a master’s or PhD application. You can download the full examples below.
Attend one of our upcoming livestreams and have your draft reviewed by an admissions essay
coach. We’ll tell you if you’re on the right track and explain how you can strengthen your case.
Want some extra inspiration? Watch recordings of past grad school essay livestreams.
For example, you might be asked to focus on the development of your personal identity;
challenges you have faced in your life; or your career motivations. This will shape your
focus and emphasis—but you still need to find your own unique approach to answering it.
There’s no universal template for a personal statement; it’s your chance to be creative and
let your own voice shine through. But there are strategies you can use to build a
compelling, well-structured story.
ExampleEvery day on the bus home from work, we pass by a row of abandoned houses. Their windows are
boarded up, the paintwork on the front doors is faded and peeling, and the front yards are overgrown with
weeds. It always seems faintly tragic to me: a lonely, desolate scene of wasted potential. I think of the
people who must have lived in those houses once, and the people who still could if the right approach were
taken.
Just stating that it interests you isn’t enough: first, you need to figure out why you’re
interested in this field:
ExampleThe mind fascinates me: The way it develops, how it shapes reality, how the interactions of tiny
cells in the brain shape the course of our whole lives. I have always taken an interest in what was going on
inside other people’s heads, but as I’ve come to understand more about psychology, what fascinates me
the most is how blind we can be to the dynamics playing out in our minds every day.
Don’t start on a cliche: avoid phrases like “Ever since I was a child…” or “For as long as I
can remember…”
Do save the introduction for last. If you’re struggling to come up with a strong opening,
leave it aside, and note down any interesting ideas that occur to you as you write the rest of
the personal statement.
To structure the body of your personal statement, there are various strategies you can
use.
Don’t try to include absolutely everything you’ve done—pick out highlights that are relevant
to your application. Aim to craft a compelling narrative that shows how you’ve changed
and actively developed yourself.
Example of describing your development over time
My interest in psychology was first sparked early in my high school career. Though somewhat
scientifically inclined, I found that what interested me most was not the equations we learned about
in physics and chemistry, but the motivations and perceptions of my fellow students, and the subtle
social dynamics that I observed inside and outside the classroom. I wanted to learn how our
identities, beliefs, and behaviours are shaped through our interactions with others, so I decided to
major in Social Psychology. My undergraduate studies deepened my understanding of, and
fascination with, the interplay between an individual mind and its social context.During my studies,
I acquired a solid foundation of knowledge about concepts like social influence and group
dynamics, but I also took classes on various topics not strictly related to my major. I was
particularly interested in how other fields intersect with psychology—the classes I took on media
studies, biology, and literature all enhanced my understanding of psychological concepts by
providing different lenses through which to look at the issues involved.
Is your social, cultural or economic background underrepresented in the field? Show how
your experiences will contribute a unique perspective.
Do you have gaps in your resume or lower-than-ideal grades? Explain the challenges you
faced and how you dealt with them.
Don’t focus too heavily on negatives, but use them to highlight your positive qualities.
Resilience, resourcefulness and perseverance make you a promising graduate school
candidate.
Growing up working class, urban decay becomes depressingly familiar. The sight of a row of
abandoned houses does not surprise me, but it continues to bother me. Since high school, I have
been determined to pursue a career in urban planning. While people of my background experience
the consequences of urban planning decisions first-hand, we are underrepresented in the field itself.
Ironically, given my motivation, my economic background has made my studies challenging. I was
fortunate enough to be awarded a scholarship for my undergraduate studies, but after graduation I
took jobs in unrelated fields to help support my parents. In the three years since, I have not lost my
ambition. Now I am keen to resume my studies, and I believe I can bring an invaluable perspective
to the table: that of the people most impacted by the decisions of urban planners.
Reflect on the topics or themes that you’ve focused on in your studies. What draws you to
them?
Discuss any academic achievements, influential teachers, or other highlights of your
education.
Talk about the questions you’d like to explore in your research and why you think they’re
important.
The personal statement isn’t a research proposal, so don’t go overboard on detail—but it’s
a great opportunity to show your enthusiasm for the field and your capacity for original
thinking.
Example of demonstrating your knowledge
In applying for this research program, my intention is to build on the multidisciplinary approach I
have taken in my studies so far, combining knowledge from disparate fields of study to better
understand psychological concepts and issues. The Media Psychology program stands out to me as
the perfect environment for this kind of research, given its researchers’ openness to collaboration
across diverse fields. I am impressed by the department’s innovative interdisciplinary projects that
focus on the shifting landscape of media and technology, and I hope that my own work can follow a
similarly trailblazing approach. More specifically, I want to develop my understanding of the
intersection of psychology and media studies, and explore how media psychology theories and
methods might be applied to neurodivergent minds. I am interested not only in media psychology
but also in psychological disorders, and how the two interact. This is something I touched on during
my undergraduate studies and that I’m excited to delve into further.
If your career is just getting started, show how your character is suited to the field, and
explain how graduate school will help you develop your talents.
If you have already worked in the profession, show what you’ve achieved so far, and
explain how the program will allow you to take the next step.
If you are planning a career change, explain what has driven this decision and how your
existing experience will help you succeed.
Don’t just state the position you want to achieve. You should demonstrate that you’ve put
plenty of thought into your career plans and show why you’re well-suited to this profession.
One thing that fascinated me about the field during my undergraduate studies was the sheer number
of different elements whose interactions constitute a person’s experience of an urban environment.
Any number of factors could transform the scene I described at the beginning: What if there were
no bus route? Better community outreach in the neighborhood? Worse law enforcement? More or
fewer jobs available in the area? Some of these factors are out of the hands of an urban planner, but
without taking them all into consideration, the planner has an incomplete picture of their task.
Through further study I hope to develop my understanding of how these disparate elements
combine and interact to create the urban environment. I am interested in the social, psychological
and political effects our surroundings have on our lives. My studies will allow me to work on
projects directly affecting the kinds of working-class urban communities I know well. I believe I
can bring my own experiences, as well as my education, to bear upon the problem of improving
infrastructure and quality of life in these communities.
Emphasize the fit with your specific interests, showing why this program would be the best
way to achieve your aims.
If there are specific classes or faculty members that you’re excited to learn from, this is the
place to express your enthusiasm.
ExampleIn the course of this research program and beyond, I hope to pursue research into the relationship
between media consumption and conditions like ADHD and autism. The work of Bernard Luskin on media
psychology has been a major influence on my own research interests and was what first drew my attention
to the faculty; the prospect of working among researchers committed to interdisciplinarity is highly
attractive to me. I believe that the novel methods being developed in this department are crucial in
illuminating how our minds adapt to a world of mass media, and my ambition is to contribute to advancing
knowledge in this field.
ExampleMy ambition as an urban planner is to work with impoverished urban communities. I want to draw
on my own and others’ experience of these spaces rather than impose a prefabricated plan from above. I
believe that by taking cues from the people affected, urban planning can more conscientiously shape the
future of our cities. This master’s degree is my path toward that goal.
Don’t summarize what you’ve already said. You have limited space in a personal
statement, so use it wisely!
Do think bigger than yourself: try to express how your individual aspirations relate to your
local community, your academic field, or society more broadly. It’s not just about what you’ll
get out of graduate school, but about what you’ll be able to give back.
Your style doesn’t have to be as formal as other kinds of academic writing, but it should be
clear, direct and coherent. Make sure that each paragraph flows smoothly from the last,
using topic sentences and transitions to create clear connections between each part.
Don’t be afraid to rewrite and restructure as much as necessary. Since you have a lot of
freedom in the structure of a personal statement, you can experiment and move
information around to see what works best.
Finally, it’s essential to carefully proofread your personal statement and fix any language
errors. Before you submit your application, consider investing in professional personal
statement editing. For $150, you have the peace of mind that your personal statement is
grammatically correct, strong in term of your arguments, and free of awkward mistakes.
Hook
The opening sentence is concise and intriguing.
The torment of the Founding Fathers is responsible for my interest in Classics. My desire to learn
Latin stemmed from reading American Revolutionary-era history during junior high and high
school, and particularly from the countless Latin quotations I found in John Adams’ writings.
Always eager for a challenge, I was intrigued by the American founders’ accounts of the torture of
learning such a difficult language. In my first semester at university, I started learning Latin and
thoroughly loved it. As I learned more and more about classical civilization through the language, I
realized that I was passionately interested in many aspects of the field of Classics. I have since
taken courses on mythology, art and archaeology, and religion, on ancient history, and on the
classical tradition. I have also learned Greek, of course, starting with an intensive two-semester
course at the university’s summer school. My experience studying abroad in Florence and traveling
through Italy and Greece intensified my zeal for the field and, in particular, fueled my ambition to
specialize in classical archaeology.
My personal philosophy of life is that everything is connected, and this conviction drives my desire
to study Classics. The most rewarding moments for me are discovering and investigating
connections – both broad ones, between fields and disciplines, and more specific ones, like the
relationship between a piece of literature and an object of material culture. My liberal arts education
has equipped me with a broad base of knowledge in the sciences, social sciences, humanities, and
arts, and in the honors program I pursued independent projects exploring academic and personal
connections, including a paper on ancient Mayan astronomy, a self-observation study on the effects
of nutrition and hydration on exercise performance, and a paper on the influence of political context
on the changing artistic representations of John Adams. By seeking out connections between
seemingly unrelated areas of academia, I have acquired a well-rounded outlook which helps me
approach new ideas with both a range of prior experiences and a mind always open to different
interpretations.
In accordance with my personal philosophy, I have also continued to explore connections within
Classics and between Classics and other fields. In 2007, I published an article in my university’s
undergraduate humanities journal; inspired by my studies in Florence, I compared representations
of the birth of Venus in ancient and Renaissance literature and art. My major academic achievement
to date, however, has been my senior honor thesis on John Adams’ connection to the Classics.
Funded by a Hilldale Research Fellowship, I conducted research in the Adams Papers at the
Massachusetts Historical Society and in John Adams’ personal library at the Boston Public Library
on the influence of the classical tradition on Adams’ worldview and how he consciously modeled
himself on classical ideals. It was particularly fulfilling to connect historical and classical research
in writing about the figure most responsible for instigating my study of the Classics.
As well as my research skills, I have demonstrated proficiency in the classical languages, winning
prizes for both Latin and Greek translation from the Classics Department, as well as receiving an
enthusiastic nomination from the department for the Pearson Fellowship from the American
Philological Association. I am also the president of the undergraduate Classics Society, which
allows me to share my enthusiasm for Classics with other students and the larger community.
One of the most appealing aspects of studying Classics is the vast range of topics encompassed by
the field. Because my interests are broad and I value an interdisciplinary approach, I would like to
pursue graduate study ultimately leading to a PhD in Classical Archaeology. Archaeology in itself
is, of course, a multi-faceted field, requiring knowledge of history, language, anthropology, and
various scientific and technological methods. I have already started building my skills in this area: I
participated in a microartifact analysis from the excavation of a Maya site in Belize as part of an
honors project, and this summer I will take part in two archaeological projects in Turkey after
working as a research assistant on related material in the spring semester. This PhD program
includes many other opportunities I am eager to explore, such as palaeography and papyrology
courses, and especially the variety of fieldwork and museum experiences available. I believe that
my strong background in the classical languages and wide range of courses on classical civilization
and archaeological methods have prepared me well for this program, and I am convinced that,
guided by my philosophy of interconnectedness, I will flourish in this program.
In some cases, you might also be asked to submit a personal statement. Similar advice
applies to both of these documents—both should give a sense of who you are, what
you’ve done and what you want to do. But a statement of purpose is often more formal,
tightly focused on your academic background and your suitability for the program.
If you are working on multiple applications, don’t try to write a one-size-fits-all text—tailor
your statement of purpose to each program. Make sure to respond to the prompt and
include all the information you’re asked for. A typical statement of purpose prompt looks
like this:
Example prompt from Berkeley Please describe your aptitude and motivation for graduate study in your
area of specialization, including your preparation for this field of study, your academic plans or research
interests in your chosen area of study, and your future career goals. Please be specific about why UC
Berkeley would be a good intellectual fit for you.
Your focus will be slightly different depending on whether you’re applying for research-
based academic programs (such as a PhD) or professional qualifications (such as an
MBA). But all statements of purpose should contain the following elements.
Personal introduction
This is your chance to introduce yourself to the admissions committee and let them hear
your voice. The statement of purpose shouldn’t tell your life story, but it should give a
glimpse into who you are.
Academic experience
If you’re applying for a research-focused program, such as a PhD, show your knowledge
of the field and outline your research experience. This might include:
Professional experience
If you’re applying for a professional program, such as an MBA, outline your experience so
far and show how it relates to your career plans. This might include:
Past or current job roles
Projects you led or participated in
Internships
Voluntary work
Training courses
In all cases, give specific examples with details of what you worked on, what you
achieved, and what you got out of the experience.
Academic motivations
For academic programs, indicate your research interests, showing how they follow from
and build upon what you have studied so far. This might include:
This isn’t the place for an in-depth research plan, but it’s a chance to show your
enthusiasm and knowledge of your field.
Professional motivations
For professional programs, outline your career aspirations and show how your experience
informs your goals. This might include:
The next step you want to take in your career. What position are you aiming for and how
will the program help you achieve it?
Your motivations for a career change. Can you make a link between your previous
experience and your new direction?
Your long-term goals. Where do you want to be in five or ten years, and how do you see
yourself getting there?
The admissions committee wants to know that you’re genuinely motivated to complete the
program, and the clearer your plans, the more convincing your commitment.
Do your research, and mention particular classes, specialisms or faculty that attracted you.
Show why you’re a good fit. Do your priorities align with the values and culture of the
institution? What will you contribute to the department?
Discuss the specific skills, knowledge and experience you expect to get from the program.
The statement of purpose isn’t only about selling yourself—it’s about illustrating an ideal
match between you and the program.
Tips for an effective statement of purpose
Once you’ve made sure to cover all the key elements, you can work on strengthening and
polishing the text. Follow these tips to make your application the best it can be.
Stay focused
It can be tempting to try to cram in everything you’ve done, but a good statement of
purpose requires careful selection to craft a focused narrative. One way to do this is by
building your text around a central theme—for example, a character trait, an intellectual
interest, or a career goal.
This strategy helps structure your text and puts your priorities centre stage. Link each
paragraph back to the central idea, making it clear how everything fits together.
For example, you might start with a chronological story of where your interests began, or
you might open with your goals and then select a series of examples that show your
capacity to achieve them. If you’re desperate to study in this specific program, you could
lead with a summary of why it’s your ideal choice, and then elaborate on each aspect to
show why you’re a perfect fit.
The important thing is that the text showcases your strengths and motivations in a
compelling, coherent way. As in any other piece of academic writing, make sure
each paragraph communicates one main idea, and that each sentence flows smoothly and
logically from the last. Use transition words and topic sentences to move between
paragraphs.
If you got top marks for your thesis, describe the research process and demonstrate your
enthusiasm for the topic. If you completed an internship or participated in a project, explain
what new skills you learned and which aspects you found most valuable. If you already
have lots of experience in the field, show how each step developed your skills and shaped
your current plans.
Make sure you stay within the recommended length, and check if there are any specific
formatting requirements. If not, use a standard 12pt font, 1-inch margins and 1.5 line
spacing.
Checklist
Checklist: Statement of purpose
0 / 9
Ideally, you should approach former supervisors who know you and your work well. Different
programs require different types of recommendation letters, but the process of requesting them is
similar.
Follow these five steps to guarantee a great recommendation, including program-specific tips and
email examples.
It’s important to ask someone who knows you well, even if they are less well known than other
professors at your institution. Graduate admissions committees want to get a good sense of your
ability to perform well in their program, and this is difficult to accomplish if your recommender
only knows you as a face in the crowd.
Who you should ask also strongly depends on the type of program that you’re applying to. Different
programs prefer different qualities in their admitted students, and thus weigh types of
recommenders differently. Take a look at the program-specific tips below.
Research
Business
Medical
Law
For research programs (MPhil, DPhil, PhD, Research Master’s), graduate admissions committees
are looking for evidence of your potential as a future researcher.
Since this is tricky to assess from test scores and transcripts, letters of recommendation are often the
most important part of a graduate research program application.
Your letter should thus be from someone who can speak to your skills as a researcher. This could
be, for example, a professor who supervised you on an independent research project, or the head of
a lab that you worked in as an undergraduate.
If you worked as a full-time research or lab assistant after undergrad, ask your managers, who are
usually full-time researchers themselves and therefore experts on what makes a good researcher.
If possible, it’s best to plan a meeting to discuss your request. However, if this isn’t practical (for
example, if you’ve moved far away from your undergrad institution), you can skip this step and
head straight to the third.
Hi Professor Smith!
I hope that everything is going well with you and that you’re still enjoying teaching your
seminar on the post World War II international order. I thoroughly enjoyed taking it with
you last year as a junior.
I’m currently thinking about what I want to do next year, which will hopefully involve
graduate work in political science, and was hoping to meet with you to discuss your
thoughts on graduate school. Do you have any time over the next few weeks to meet?
Best,
Janna
Instead of just asking for a recommendation letter, specifically ask if they can write you a strong
recommendation. This allows your recommender an “out”—for example, if they don’t feel they
know you well enough. A bad or even lukewarm recommendation is the kiss of death for any
application, so it’s important to ensure your letters will be positive!
If they say they can’t give you a strong recommendation, don’t panic. This gives you the
opportunity to ask someone else who can provide you a better recommendation.
How are you? I hope everything is going well and you’re still teaching Introduction to Labor
Economics to eager students!
I’ve been out of school for a year now, working as a full-time research assistant in New York
City. Come this fall, I’m hoping to apply to a few programs for graduate school, mostly
doctoral programs in Economics.
Since I took two economics classes with you (Introduction to Labor Economics in Spring
2018 and Industrial Organization in Fall 2019), I was hoping that you might agree to serve as
a letter writer for my graduate program. I wanted to highlight my work in labor economics,
since that’s what I’m hoping to study in graduate school. Also, since I loved your classes, I
thought you might be a good person to ask!
Best,
Mary
Email example: Requesting a recommendation letter
Hi Professor Jones!
How are you? I hope everything is going well and you’re still teaching Introduction to Labor
Economics to eager students!
I’ve been out of school for a year now, working as a full-time research assistant in New York City.
Come this fall, I’m hoping to apply to a few programs for graduate school, mostly doctoral
programs in Economics.
Since I took two economics classes with you (Introduction to Labor Economics in Spring 2018 and
Industrial Organization in Fall 2019), I was hoping that you might agree to serve as a letter writer
for my graduate program. I wanted to highlight my work in labor economics, since that’s what I’m
hoping to study in graduate school. Also, since I loved your classes, I thought you might be a good
person to ask!
The letters of recommendation would be due to each individual program’s website in December. I
understand, of course, if you’re too busy this summer or if you don’t feel that you would be the best
fit to write a letter. My goal is simply to paint as complete a picture as possible of my undergrad
career at Western. If you’d like, we can also discuss this on the phone.
Best,
Mary
Step 4: Share your resume and other materials
You should send your resume or CV to your recommenders, along with any other material
that might jog their memory or aid in their recommendation.
For instance, you may want to send along your statement of purpose or writing sample if
one is requested in your application. Admission committees are looking for a cohesive
story that the letters of recommendation, personal statement, and CV work together to tell.
You should also check whether the school provides any prompts or guidelines for
recommenders. Many programs want your recommenders to comment on your potential to
serve in the specific role the graduate program prepares you for. See the program-specific
tips below.
Research
Business
Medical
For a research program application, when updating your recommenders, make sure to emphasize
any publications or large research projects you’ve completed since you worked together.
If any materials are late, programs will often reject your entire application, so it is
imperative that your recommenders get their letters in on time. However, you should also
keep in mind that your letter writers are probably quite busy, so don’t send too many
reminders!
Hope the semester is going well! Thank you again for agreeing to serve as my recommender.
I just wanted to send you a quick reminder that recommendations for Program X, Y, and Z
are due in two weeks, on December 15. Please let me know if you need anything else from
me, and thank you again!
Best,
Mary
Before the interview, you should prepare by doing your research and reflecting on how you’ll
answer these common questions.
If possible, talk to previous students about their experiences interviewing. Although no two
interview experiences are exactly alike, they may be able to provide you with valuable tips for
preparing.
You should prepare answers for certain, very common questions. You don’t need to memorize your
answers—you don’t want to sound scripted, but you should have a sense of what you’ll say.
Don’t be afraid to take a few seconds to gather your thoughts before answering a question.
Remember, the substance and quality of your answer are far more important than the quantity of
words.
Business
Medical
Law
If you’re interviewing for a research program, you should try to read as many papers in your field of
interest as possible. Reading others’ research helps you generate ideas of your own. You’ll also be
more prepared to answer questions about the topics you’re interested in researching, which could
come up during your interview.
Research programs may ask you about a current topic in your field and what methods you would
use for tackling it. Make sure you know some of the current open questions in your field and think
about how you would answer them, including dealing with any obstacles that might come up. One
potential tip is to talk to older students or professors that you know about these questions.
Focus on the CVs or biographies of professors that you’re particularly interested in working with.
Read any research they’ve authored and jot down questions that come to mind when reading. Try to
come up with a good argument for why they would be a good fit to supervise or work with you.
You should also tailor your answer to the type of program you’re applying to:
If you’re applying for a research-based master’s or doctoral program, you will want to focus
particularly on your academic and research background.
If you’re applying to medical school, your academic background is important, but so is your
personal motivation.
Business schools will want to hear about how your professional experience has prepared you to
manage others in a rapidly changing and increasingly global business climate.
As part of Dr. Jane Smith’s class on religion in politics, we were required to complete an
independent research project, so I looked at the influence of right-wing authoritarianism in anti-
Semitism. To measure anti-Semitism, I used an implicit bias test, which has been shown to measure
racial or gender bias in other studies. I found that tendencies towards right-wing authoritarianism
were associated with worse performance on the anti-Semitic test. The project was my first
introduction to performing independent research, writing literature reviews, and performing
statistical analysis using the coding language R.
I’ve also assisted Dr. Hannah Wilson on her research on the impact of globalization and job losses
on voting patterns in the United States. I wrote literature reviews and aided in data analysis using R.
I was a co-author on her latest paper, which used the recent tariffs on steel as an instrumental
variable to demonstrate that increased globalization led to a higher increase in votes for political
populist parties, since the choice of instrumental variable was originally my idea. The paper has
been accepted to a top journal of political science. I am currently completing an independent senior
thesis expanding our methodology to the United Kingdom and France, for which I have received a
competitive research grant from my university.
I believe that I have demonstrated strong research skills through my work with Dr. Wilson, in
addition to my strong academic performance. It is very rare for undergraduates to co-author with
professors at my university, let alone write a paper accepted by a top journal.
Business schools might want you to discuss any management experience you’ve had—
particularly experiences where you overcame obstacles or a difficult interpersonal
interaction.
Questions about your interests and motivations
You’ll be asked questions designed to assess your knowledge of the program and how
well it fits with your academic or professional interests.
Stay away from answers like “because you’re a good program” or “I want to attend a
prestigious school.” While prestige matters, graduate programs want to hear more about
why you think you’re a good fit for their particular program.
If the program has a particular speciality that interests you—say a medical school that’s
particularly well known for their research on Alzheimer’s or a business school whose
marketing program is top notch—be sure to bring it up. This will demonstrate to the
interviewers that you have a genuine interest in their program.
Mention any professors you are especially interested in working with or any resources that
the school may have special access to. Perhaps they run an internship program in an area
you’re interested in or have strong connections in a particular industry.
My experience working in marketing at X Marketing Agency has shown me that my future career
path lies in this field. Your program is arguably the best in the world for marketing, so you are my
top choice of business school.
I am particularly interested in taking classes under Dr. Jennifer Adams—I’m greatly interested in
her work showing that many companies use marketing to demonstrate a personal lifestyle brand that
customers want to align with. I would also love to participate in the semester-long San Francisco
internship program that you have, which I think would allow me to explore my interests in
marketing in the technology industry.
You should therefore come up with a few topics, preferably ones that are strengths of the
school’s faculty, to discuss during an interview.
Ideally, I’d like to start off by gaining experience in a law firm, then move to a company where I
can work as an in-house lawyer. I’m not entirely sure which branch of law I’d like to pursue yet, but
I’m planning on taking classes in bankruptcy and corporate law to see if they interest me.
If you’re applying to a doctoral program, you will most likely be expected to continue in a
career in academia, although this may vary based on the program. If you don’t have a
perfect idea of what you want to do, don’t panic—that is part of what the program is
intended to do! Just answer with your current thoughts.
Funding opportunities: do they have funding available for research or projects you might
want to carry out? How accessible is it?
Access to advisors: How often do advisors meet with their students? How hands-on are
advisors?
Other access to resources: if you need computing resources for your projects, will you
have access to them? Do they have a library of books or academic articles that will be
available for you as a student?
Placement record (if not available online): How do students normally place after
completing this program? What sort of jobs do they take? How long do they require to find a
full-time job? Do they normally go on to tenure-track positions or something else?
Although personal considerations (such as what it’s like to date or live in the city where the
school is located) are vitally important to the choice of a graduate program, you should
generally ask these questions only of current and former students, not faculty or
admissions officers. Try to keep your questions on the theme of academic or professional
experiences.
There are also some questions that interviewers should not ask you. Although it rarely
occurs, be aware that you don’t have to answer questions that are inappropriate, or
possibly even illegal, including anything that relates to your marital status or pregnancy,
age, disability status, race, or gender. If asked a question that falls into this category, you
should inform the interviewer that you’re not comfortable answering and report the incident
to an admissions officer afterwards.