Curr Design and Devt Assignment Term Paper
Curr Design and Devt Assignment Term Paper
1. What is curriculum design? Read different articles that will help you to understand the practice of
curriculum design. Finally, write a term paper that clearly shows the concept of curriculum design,
its major components and the procedures followed under each component.
concept of curriculum design
Curriculum design is the process of taking a subject and creating a plan for teaching that subject.
This includes deciding what materials to use, how those materials will be organized, and how they
will be used in the classroom to develop students’ knowledge and skills.
Curriculum design refers to the ways in which we position the curriculum components.Regardless
of the supporting curriculum model, all curriculum designs endeavour to address four curriculum
components why do we initiate instruction or aims What should we teach to realize our set aims
and objectives How can we interconnect
target learning experiences What have we realized and what actions should we take accordingly in
relation to the instructional program, learners, and teachers Although most,
if not all, curriculum designs include these four components, they significantly differ in how they
address these elements, because of the curriculum philosophy and model on which a design is
based. For example, subject-matter-based designs, which overplaying the logical organization of
content, and the learner-centered ones, which focus on the learners and their needs, entail different
treatments of the four curriculum components. The following sections very briefly highlight the
process of curriculum design. This will involve general overviews of major related sources,
curriculum conceptualization and curriculum design stages, in addition to modern issues of
classroom-level teacher curriculum design and class/room-level teacher professional development.
2. Write a brief term paper that discusses about the different curriculum
development approaches, elements included in the curriculum development, the
different models and the steps followed in the different models.
According to Ornstein and Hunkins (1993) the main curriculum approaches are the following:
Behavioral
Managerial
Systems
Academic
Humanist
Reconceptualists
The behavioral approach is the oldest and still the reference approach to curriculum. Behaviorism is
primarily concerned with observable and measurable aspects of human behavior
(Standridge,2002:1). According to Power (1982:168), the basic principle of behaviorism is:
Whatever can be known about human beings must come from an observation of behavior,
moreover, must be conducted according to the strict methods of scientific procedure that is
used in the physical sciences.
So, the behavioral approach is logical and prescriptive and grounded on technical and scientific
principles. It comprises paradigms or models as well as gradual and detailed strategies for
formulating curriculum. This approach is generally underpinned by a plan specifying goals and
objectives, contents and sequenced, structured activities, methodologies, and learning outcomes
with corresponding criteria and evaluation forms, taking into account the established curriculum
goals and objectives.
Among other names, the systems approach to designing curriculum is also called instructional systems
design (ISD). In accordance with Clark (1989:3), the system approach or instructional design may be
understood as:a systematic model used to plan, design, develop, and evaluation training, which includes
the following components:
The academic approach ―attempts to analyze and synthesize major positions, trends, and concepts of
curriculum.‖(Ornstein & Hunkins1993:6). It tends to be grounded on historical and philosophical
curriculum developments and to a lesser extent on social conditions. This approach is concerned with
comprehensive domains of schooling, including the study of education. It is usually scholastic and
theoretical, hence, also referred to as ―traditional, encyclopedic, synoptic, intellectual, or knowledge-
oriented approach‖ (Ornstein & Hunkins 1993:6)
The reconceptualists
The reconceptualists represent an approach to curriculum design without a model to guide the design
(or to deal with technical matters), tending rather to focus on larger ideological and moral issues relating
to education (not only curriculum) and economic and political institutions of society (not only of schools)
(Ornstein & Hunkins 1993). This approach is rooted in philosophy as well as social and political contexts.
According to Jackson (1992:35), it is based on three main characteristics:
There are five key elements of curriculum development , according to Tyler “it is essential as a part of
comprehensive theory of organization to show just what are the elements will serve satisfactory as
organizing elements.” According to Herrick and Tyler, following are the components and elements of
curriculum development
1. Situational analysis
2. Formulation of objectives
5. Evaluation
The curriculum development models
Curriculum development models are different programmatic plans (various sequences of steps devised
with a view to curriculum effectiveness) which implies continuous monitoring of implementation to
ensure that relevant considerations receive due attention.
This model is most commonly used. Taba (1962) argues that curriculum should be designed by
the teachers rather than handed down by higher authority. In this regard she postulates that the
teachers should start the process by creating trial teaching learning units in their schools rather
than engaging from outset in creating a general curriculum design. Unlike the traditional
approach which proceeds from the general to the particular, the approach in this case is
inductive
4. Developing a framework
This model is embodied in Tyler‘s work titled Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction (1949). It
comprises the following stages:
1, the selection of objectives
.J. Biggs, C. Tang, Teaching for Quality Learning at University (McGraw Hill Education & Open University
Press., Maidenhead, 2007)
Barnett, R., Parry, G. and Coate, K., (2001) ‘Conceptualising Curriculum Change', Teaching in Higher
Education.