1st Semester Summarization Tomboc Untalan
1st Semester Summarization Tomboc Untalan
By:
BSCpE 1.1 A
The amount of global trade has multiplied 20 times since 1950. Foreign
investment flows nearly doubled from $468 billion to $827 billion between 1997 and
1999. Particularly, improvements in information technology have fundamentally
changed economic life. Globalization proponents contend that it enables
underdeveloped nations and their inhabitants to experience economic growth. The term
'globalization' has earned considerable credit in the social sciences and has also come
into common use in public debates. There is hardly any consensus on either its precise
meaning or its determining forces or consequences. The IMF (2008) defines
globalization as the process of making the world economy an 'organic system' by
extending transnational economic processes and relations to more and more countries
and deepening the economic interdependencies among them. The phenomenon can
have several interconnected dimensions, such as the globalization of trade of goods
and services, financial and capital markets, technology and production. There is no
single definition of globalization, and there is no consensus on its origin. If we accept
that economic globalization is a process that creates an 'organic system' of the world
economy, it seems reasonable to look beyond the last 30 years or so. The best-known
example of archaic globalization is the Silk Road, which connected Asia, Africa, and
Europe. The first multinational corporations, the British and Dutch East India
Companies, established in 1600 and 1602, did not favor international economic
integration. Countries were mostly self-sufficient and autarkic, the UK and the
Netherlands being the only exceptions.
Capitalism is not the mere existence of persons or firms producing for sale on the
market with the intention of making a profit. We are in a capitalist system only when the
system gives priority to the endless accumulation of capital. Capitalists need a large
market (hence mini systems are too narrow for them) but they also need a multiplicity of
states. Using the same name to describe institutions in different historical systems often
confuses rather than clarifies analysis. It is better to think of the set of institutions of the
modern world-system as contextually specific to it.
The basic institutions are the market, firms, households, the classes, and the status
groups (or identities). Capitalism cannot function without markets, and it is true that
capitalists often say they favor free markets. But capitalists need not totally free markets
but markets that are only partially free. What one needs most is the support of a
relatively strong state, one which can enforce a quasi-monopoly. For much of the 20th
century, analysts argued that the state was being displaced as the primary vehicle
through which political and economic institutions would organize themselves. The early
years of the twenty-first century have shown us that globalization, at least in the short
run, has not displaced the state, but that it has dispersed power beyond the state.
States now find themselves in subordinate positions, particularly in the pecking order of
global capitalism, with diminished capacities to protect their populations. The United
Nations had 51 founding members shortly after the Second World War in 1945; by the
end of 2012, the U.N. had 193 member states. Many of these states emerged as a
result of decolonization in the 1950s and 1960s and the breakup of the Soviet Union in
1991. Controversies over which political communities have the right to belong to the
United Nations illustrate the power and symbolism of states in the global age.
Script – the very first writing – allowed humans to share knowledge and ideas
over much larger spaces and across much longer times. With script on sheets of
papyrus and parchment, humans had a medium that catapulted globalization. The great
civilizations, from Egypt and Greece to Rome and China, were made possible through
the script. Millions of books, pamphlets, and flyers were produced, reproduced, and
circulated. Literacy of common people was to revolutionize every aspect of life.
The global city represents and, in many ways, contains the world in a bounded
space. Many global problems, contradictions and inequalities also find expression
amidst the teeming verve of the global city. Large, diverse cities attract people, material
and cultural products from all over the world. Ceaselessly on offer is a cross-cultural
variety of goods and services. The promise and allure of cosmopolitan consumption are
familiar to the dweller of any large twenty-first-century city.
The availability of food from diverse culinary traditions is taken for granted; a
feature of the global city that can be seen, smelt and tasted. The global city also
provides a cosmopolitan variety of cultural products, in order to attract and satisfy those
with cross-cultural curiosity and a desire to engage with "otherness".
The idea of "global city" emerged in the social science literature in the 1980s,
shortly after the concept of globalization captured the social scientific imagination.
Global cities, either as centers of imperial power or "free cities" at the crossroads of
international merchant routes, existed since ancient times. Roderick McKenzie
conceptualized a global network of cities as early as 1927.
Saskia Sassen: The ascendance of information and capital has led to a re-
scaling of what are the strategic territories that articulate the new system. These include
sub-national, notably cities and regions; cross-border regions; and supra-national
entities, i.e., global digitalized markets and free trade blocs. The dynamics and
processes that get territorialized at these diverse scales can in principle be regional,
national or global. I locate the emergence of global cities against this range of
instantiations of strategic scales and spatial units. The globalization of economic activity
entails a new type of organizational structure, which requires a new kind of conceptual
architecture to capture it.
The Brunt land Report of 1987 defines sustainability as 'development that meets
the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet
their own needs'. In other words, it is about responsible use of resources. Sustainability
should be seen as different from stability, although at first sight the overlap seems
obvious. In the 19th and early 20th centuries sustainability played a marginal role
because it was better to think primarily about new technologies making a better use of
resources. For a long time, the earth seemed to be a space able to deliver an unlimited
number of chances and goods, and simultaneously adopt unlimited pollution, slavery,
and violence.
This illusion is over, but the externalization bias is still strong. Even today if a
society wants a cleaner environment, it can always shift its 'dirty' production abroad to
other, usually poorer countries.
In 2010–12, around 870 million people around the world continued to suffer from
hunger (FAO, 2012). Food system processes, activities, and outcomes have become
increasingly interlinked across local, national and regional levels. Developments at the
global level often have the power to penetrate deep within regions and states to cause
high levels of insecurity. The first official definition of food security emerged at the 1974
UN World Food Conference. In subsequent decades three distinct paradigm shifts took
place to significantly influence the food security discourse and international agenda.
Much of this shift was driven by Amartya Sen's seminal work, Poverty and
Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation (1981). Some of the most
devastating famines of the past century were caused not by lack of food availability, but
by a decline in access to food (FAO, 2001). The FAO identifies four key pillars of food
security – availability, access, utilization and stability. It has also moved away from a
purely calorie-counting approach to food security.
Since the early 1990s, food security has become strongly associated with the
wider concept of human security. The concept prioritizes the safety of individuals and
communities from a range of threats arising from different sources. Poverty is the main
cause of food insecurity, which is, in turn, linked more broadly to 'political security,
socio-economic development, human rights and the environment'. The 2007–8 global
food price spike saw in its wake violent riots and protests in over 30 countries (Brown,
2008; Dupont, and Thirwell, 2009; Evans, 2009). In early 2011, several countries in the
Middle East and North Africa experienced widespread protests and riots against ruling
regimes.
Rising food prices were a key factor in fueling these events (Lagi et al., 2011).
The official approach to food security has a heavy focus on trade and export-oriented
agriculture as the main path out of food insecurity. This is arguably underpinned by a
serious commitment the 'right to trade' as enshrined in the World Trade Organization
(WTO) regime. In this process, small farmers have often been forced off their lands, and
traditional farming practices and local food systems are disrupted.
The argument that a rising global population is behind sharp and sudden
increases in global food prices is a dubious one. By mid-century, the world's total
population is set to reach over nine billion, doubling the demand for food, feed, and fiber
(FAO, 2009). As incomes in developing countries continue to grow, more people can
access food in greater quantities. Global consumption of animal products, such as meat
and dairy, is grain-intensive and therefore increases indirectly human consumption of
both grain and water. Meat consumption in developing countries has lagged that in
richer countries like China and Brazil.
In India, for instance, the consumption of meat continues to lag when compared
with that in wealthier countries. However, the overall demand for animal feed through
poultry, pork, eggs and dairy items continues to expand.
Conclusion
Globalization is the interaction and integration of people, businesses, and
governments from various countries, fueled by trade, investment, and information
technology. It was happening for a long time until today. Globalization is the interaction
and integration of people, businesses, and governments from various countries, fueled
by trade, investment, and information technology. There are a lot changes happen in
the globalization every country. he first multinational corporations, the British and Dutch
East India Companies, established in 1600 and 1602, did not favor international
economic integration. Countries were mostly self-sufficient and autarkic, the UK and the
Netherlands being the only exceptions. In 1867, European nations, as well as the
United States, propagated a deliberate shift to gold at the International Monetary
Conference in Paris.
The Philippines has traditionally had a private enterprise economy both in policy
and in practice. The government intervened primarily through fiscal and monetary policy
and in the exercise of its regulatory authority. Philippine government has taken a rather
conservative stance on fiscal activities. During the Marcos regime, national government
activity increased to between 15 and 17 percent of gross national product (GNP). Tax
revenue, however, remained relatively stable, seldom rising above 12 percent of GNP.
Globalization is most often used in an economic context, but it also affects and is
affected by politics and culture. Globalization is defined as a set of multiple, uneven,
and sometimes. overlapping historical processes, including economics, politics, and
culture, that have combined with media technology to create the conditions under which
the globe itself can now be understood as an imagined community.
The rise in food prices is one of the key factors fueling inflation, according to
recent CPI data. Meat consumption in developing countries has lagged that in richer
countries like China and Brazil. In India, for instance, the consumption of meat
continues to lag when compared with that in wealthier countries. Feeding the world in a
sustainable way is one of our most pressing challenges in the coming decades. Meat
plays a pivotal role in this. Meat is an important source of nutrition for many people
around the world. Global demand for meat is growing: over the past 50 years, meat
production has more than tripled. The world now produces more than 340 million tonnes
each year.