Term 2 Revision Worksheet Ms
Term 2 Revision Worksheet Ms
1
(b) Disadvantages of banning DDT: [3 max]
DDT effectively killed malarial mosquitoes, and since the ban
populations of mosquitoes have increased;
incidence of malaria has increased as a result;
malaria is a disease to which children are particularly vulnerable
and has huge socio-economic implications;
90% of all malaria cases are in Africa, a continent least able to deal
with the socio-economic consequences of the disease;
Advantages of banning DDT: [3 max]
environmental side-effects of DDT have been avoided by banning
its use;
e.g. DDT is not biodegradable and accumulates in the tissues
of living organisms (bioaccumulation) damaging or even
eliminating populations;
e.g. because DDT becomes more concentrated along food chains
(bioconcentration) top carnivores tend to be most affected and
these may play a very significant role in maintaining balance
of whole ecosystem;
target insects can develop resistance, but DDT also kills other
insects which may be natural predators of the mosquitoes, so
the ban allows natural balance to be restored; 6 max
2
(c) Methods for improving productivity of soil:
improving fertility of the soil with (organic fertilizers/manure/chemical)
fertilizers;
reducing losses due to pests/disease with chemical treatments;
improving nitrogen fixation by planting leguminous crops e.g. beans;
reducing loss of nutrients due to soil erosion by terracing fields;
reducing loss of nutrients/topsoil due to wind erosion by planting
shelter belts;
avoiding over-intensive farming by allowing fields fallow/rest
periods;
avoiding depletion of nutrients by rotating crops;
improving yields through irrigation;
avoiding over-compaction of soil through use of appropriate/low
impact technology;
reducing wastage by increasing field size e.g. through removal
of hedgerows;
use of GM/Green Revolution crops e.g. higher yielding varieties
of rice;
Contrasting approaches of ecocentric and technocentric farmers:
both ecocentric and technocentric farmers might apply fertilizers, but
choice of fertilizer might reflect their values e.g. ecocentric using
manure (to work with natural processes), whereas technocentric
might use chemical fertilizers;
technocentrics might favour high tech solutions such as GM crops
whereas ecocentrics might be concerned about the ethical issues of GM;
ecocentrics often express a lack of faith in large-scale technology
so might oppose strategies used by agribusiness e.g. high-tech
irrigation systems; 8 max
Award credit for any other answers of equivalent validity, relevance
and substance.
Award [6 max] if no contrast is made between ecocentric and
technocentric farmers.
Allocation of marks can be split flexibly for part (c).
Expression of ideas [2 max]
[20]
3
3. (a) describing water budget: [3 max]
only 2.6 % is fresh water;
over 80 % is in ice caps and glaciers;
0.6 % is groundwater;
rest of is made up of lakes, rivers, etc.;
Precise figures are not required, but some indication of relative amounts is.
explaining why possible source of conflict: [5 max]
water resources are now becoming a limiting factor in many societies;
availability of water for drinking, industry and agriculture needs to
be considered;
many societies are now dependent primarily on groundwater
which is non-renewable;
as populations grow, greater demands are made on water resources;
as societies develop water needs increase;
when water supplies fail, populations will be forced to take drastic
steps, e.g. mass migration/civil unrest/wars may result; 7 max
4
(c) description: [3 max]
irrigation using pumped groundwater reserves;
genetically modified plant species, disease-resistant cereals;
rice with genes to produce more proteins and vitamins;
hydroponics is a good example of a technological solution;
mechanization;
agribusiness/industrial agriculture;
fertilizers/pesticides;
Award [1 max] for any statement which explains what a technocentric
strategy might be.
evaluation: [3 max]
techno solutions may represent the only way to increase yield to
meet demand;
may have environmental costs/not be environmentally sustainable;
high economic outlay, and therefore not an option for LEDC;
may include both engineering solutions and biotechnology solutions; 6 max
Award [4 max] if there is no evaluation. Award [1 max] for any
correct reference to Boserup’s theory.
Expression of ideas [2 max]
[20]
5
(b) local support: [2 max]
local guides and rangers earn a living assisting tourists within the
park and prevent poaching;
their economic future and the future of the park are intrinsically linked;
they have a positive vested interest in the park;
they have a respect and pride for the park that they view as theirs;
government agencies: [2 max]
government through its employees, wildlife agencies, rangers, guides,
provides the park with security
and infrastructure;
they monitor and control visitor numbers;
co-ordinate anti-poaching activities;
punish poachers;
manage park funding;
maintain communications;
provide resources;
liaise with local groups, non-government groups and international
organizations;
research: [2 max]
scientific research discovers change/damage/stress/new species/
monitors abiotic and biotic conditions within the park;
highlights new information;
research identifies new hazards and new goals;
produces information that supports the parks existence and informs
management decisions;
helps educate those inside and those outside the park; 6 max
Award [4 max] if no named protect area.
6
(c) species based conservation: [3 max]
concentrates on one or two key species;
usually organisms that possess strong aesthetic qualities, tigers,
bears, pretty birds etc.;
habitat conditions are maximized to meet the needs of the key species;
indirectly such management techniques may benefit many
non-target species and the ecosystem per se;
habitat protection for one species may protect many species;
however, a species based approach may result in a species
being conserved artificially outside its habitat, thus the organism
and not the habitat it belongs in is protected;
trophy hunting: [3 max]
the protection of animals for sport/hunting may also be seen as a
species based approach to conservation;
though the animal is being maintained for economic gain and
pleasure, it is none the less being conserved;
numbers are kept high by managing habitat, controlling predators
providing additional food;
managing habitat for “game” may have benefits for many other species;
game reserves may have less disturbance, less alien species
(e.g. cattle and sheep); 6 max
Expression of ideas [2 max]
[20]
(b) conflict might exist because different groups see the resource differently;
economic value of timber/land is incompatible with leaving forest
standing for other uses (indigenous cultures);
indigenous tribes need large amounts of space in which to live
sustainably;
reserves left for indigenous people may be too small to sustain them;
forest is cut down by outsiders ignoring the needs of indigenous
people;
intrinsic value of forest (biorights) is ignored by exploitative
users only interested in economic use;
difference between sustainable use of forest (natural income)
and users who exploit natural capital;
conflict between short-term and long-term perspective
(indigenous people); 3 max
[5]
7
6. (a) This can be argued either way, although it is more probable that
Kuan Tzu was an ecocentrist. Give credit for strong justification.
Ecocentrist because
the proverb seems to be advising taking a long-term view;
clearly advocates education and ecocentrism stresses importance
of self-reliant communities;
through education people will arguably learn to value the
environment and use resources sustainably;
refers to “the people” and this perhaps suggests a lack of faith
in elites/authorities;
or technocentrist because
education will help lead to technological development;
through technology we will find longer term solutions to
environmental problems;
we need to understand natural processes in order to control them;
faith in the ability of people to overcome obstacles; 4
8
7. (a) 6
(c) kaway ;
salmon ;
kaway is more efficient; 3 max
9
low tropic levels, but in aquatic systems most food is
harvested from higher trophic levels;
energy conversions along the food chain may be more
efficient in aquatic systems;
initial fixing or available solar energy by primary producers
tend to be less efficient due to the absorption and reflection
of light by water; 3
(iii)
Low Input Systems High Input Systems
migratory pastoralists, Kenya cattle, UK
shifting cultivation, Papua New Guinea wheat, UK
maize, USA
10
(ii) MEDCs tend to have larger ecological footprints than LEDCs;
because they have high “grain equivalent” food consumption
lifestyles;
they consume high levels of fossil fuel;
high CO2 emissions;
produce larger amounts of waste;
higher lifestyle expectations and possess more consumer goods;
use proportionately more raw materials; 4 max
(d) 0.04; 1
11
(e) e.g. tropical rainforest and tundra;
mean NPP tropical rainforest greater than tundra/mean biomass
tropical rainforest far greater than tundra;
NPP per kg biomass of tropical rainforest is far lower than tundra;
Candidates may give figures from the table but they need to make
comparative statements.
tropical rainforest hot and wet so greater opportunity to develop
large biomass/high rate of photosynthesis and high rate of
respiration so NPP/per kg biomass/per year is low;
tundra cold and dry so low rates of photosynthesis and respiration/
plants slow growing, slow accumulation of biomass, relatively large
growth in biomass per year; 4 max
Award up to [2 max] for comparison and up to [2 max] for
explanation. Award any other combination of two ecosystems.
(iii) e.g. light levels would decrease with distance into wood 1
(iv) along a profile or transect;
take reading at regular intervals;
enough to be statistically significant;
take samples using relevant equipment; 2
(b) (i) N= ;
N = 89.6; 2
12
(ii) make sure all traps were working properly;
ensure all traps were equally baited;
ensure all animals were handled humanely and not hurt;
ensure all traps were in similar locations (e.g. all at the base
of a tree, all on a defined animal track);
traps checked at same time each day;
mark in a way that will not rub off;
mark in a way that does not compromise survival; 2 max
Accept other reasonable answers.
(d) (i) D = ;
D= ;
D = 4.28; 3
13
(d) Any two of the following for [1]
natural hazards;
global catastrophe;
habitat loss;
pollution;
over exploitation; 1 max
Accept other appropriate answers.
[6]
12. (a) use of global resources at a rate that allows natural regeneration;
and minimizes damage to the environment;
Give credit if concept of replenishable capital is mentioned. 2
(b) Give full credit for either a brief discussion of several human
actions or a full discussion of one. Credit should be given
for use of examples / case studies.
Allow [5] for how resource has been managed unsustainably
and [5] for consequences for ecosystems.
soil resources
human actions could include:
overgrazing;
deforestation;
unsustainable irrigation;
land pollution;
acid deposition; 5 max
Or a more detailed discussion of one or more of these.
water resources
human actions could include abstraction of ground water;
pollution;
eutrophication;
increased demand for water;
wastage of water resources;
Or a detailed discussion of one or more of these. 5 max
14
consequences could include:
loss of habitat;
role of water in soil formation and consequences for soil formation
if water shortage occurs (e.g. increased rates of salinisation;
increased rates of soil erosion as water table is lowered);
eutrophication consequences on aquatic ecosystem;
impact of pollutants on aquatic fauna (e.g. mutations, progressive,
concentration of pollutants along the food chain);
impact of pollutants on flora e.g. impact of acid rain on coniferous forests; 5 max
OR
Water resources
suggest more sustainable practices;
reducing water use;
recycling;
metering water;
pollution monitoring or control;
e.g. with respect to eutrophication; 5 max
Credit should be given if reference is made to
specific case studies.
[20]
15
(b) global warming will lead to changes in global water budget;
with increased melting of glacial ice and ice caps;
and will cause changes in precipitation (amounts and distribution);
evaporation rates will change;
seasonality will vary which could be significant in water supply;
increased flood risks in certain areas;
and expanding desert zones with water shortage; 5 max
14. (a) The system should be both terrestrial or both aquatic. Examples
could compare salmon fishing in Norway with rice fish farming
in Thailand, intensive beef farming in North America and Masai
herding in Kenya. No credit should be given for naming the food
production system. However, if food production system is not
named award [5 max].
Award [2 max] for resource inputs.
The following points could be considered:
comparison of contrasting fertilizer use;
variation in water resource use;
labour input;
energy input;
Award [2 max] for resource outputs.
The following points could be considered:
consideration of variation in system productivity;
reference to net and gross production;
Award [2 max] for technology.
The following points could be considered:
comparison of the variation in technology and the implication for
the system;
technology may include machinery and organic technology
e.g. GM crops, the use of draft animals versus agricultural
machinery; 6 max
Any other reasonable answers.
16
(b) Answers should clearly demonstrate the direct and indirect impact
of the two farming systems on their immediate environment.
The nature of the systems chosen will dictate the content of the
answer.
salmon fishing in Norway:
organic debris contamination of coastal waters from waste food
and excreta;
the addition of steroids and other chemical waste to the adjacent
coastal waters;
accidental escape and the contamination of local gene pools;
potentially introduces non-natural genetic variation;
rice fish farming:
impacts on local biodiversity – both plants and animals;
introduces alien species;
changes nutrients budget;
impacts directly on natural resources/food within the system; 5 max
Answers must refer to both systems for full marks.
17
15. (a) as tractor use increase farm labour use goes down;
agriculture is becoming more mechanized;
agriculture may be more intensive;
less need for labour on farm;
farms becoming larger require more machinery;
farming/agriculture is becoming more technocentric; 2 max
(c) Award [1] for named agricultural system and associate impact.
e.g. prairie grassland US, loss of biodiversity;
e.g. Norfolk grasslands UK, loss of marshland from drainage;
e.g. slash and burn subsistence farming, loss of forest habitat;
e.g. extensive cattle farming east-Africa, introduction of disease; 1 max
(d) soil has become more valuable as it has become more scarce;
increasingly seen as a resource requiring protection with special
techniques e.g. shelter and salinisation of soil resource due to
poor management;
decline in soil quality due to poor management e.g. salinisation
(over irrigation);
loss of soil due to soil erosion;
soil degradation and lowered productivity; 2 max
Accept other reasonable responses.
[7]
18
(b) Sandy soils are characterised by large grains and large pore spaces
whereas clay soils are characterised by small grains and small pore spaces;
sand soils are therefore freely drained (but have poor water retention);
whereas clay soils hold water well (but have poor water retention);
whereas clay soils hold water well (but are subject to water logging);
clay soils have a better nutrient content due to the clay humus complex
whereas sand soils do not;
sand soils tend to have a blocky or crumb structure favouring root
growth whereas clay soils tend to have a platy structure which can
inhibit root growth;
clay soils are traditionally more difficult to work / plow (heavy and sticky
when wet, hard when dry), sandy soils are generally easier to work;
clay soils heat and cool quickly, sandy soils exhibit a slower
thermal response; 5 max
(c) Award [1] for naming systems. e.g. N. America cereal farming
nomadic herding in Tanzania
Commercial measures tent to be large scale;
high technology;
and may be supported by government initiatives;
examples of measures:
addition of fertilizers;
crop rotation;
contour plowing;
plowing technology which leaves roots in soil;
strip cultivation;
tree belts as wind breaks;
19
17. (a) eutrophication represents the nutrient enrichment of a body of
water;
it can occur naturally but is often triggered by the addition of
external anthropogenically derived material, waste fertilizer etc.;
nutrients cause an explosion in algae/blue green algae within the
water column;
the massive growth rate consumes a high proportion of available O 2;
physiological stress due to lack of O2 causes population crashes in
many other aquatic organisms;
food chains, habitats, ecosystems collapse;
positive feedback situation;
sewage waste, agricultural run-off rich in phosphates and nitrates
and fisheries food and excrement all represent sources of nutrient
enrichment within the aquatic system; 6 max
(c) the key difference between aquatic and terrestrial food production
systems is the level from which food is harvested;
terrestrial systems harvest the bulk of food from much lower in
the food chain;
aquatic/marine systems from much higher up;
aquatic/marine systems harvest primarily animal protein (fish,
birds, mammals, crustaceans etc.);
whereas terrestrial systems harvest primarily carbohydrates/plant
material (cereals, grains, root crops etc.) with some additional
animal protein (livestock);
aquatic/marine systems are predominantly hunter-gatherer systems
(sometimes on an industrial scale);
stocks are left to recover naturally after harvesting;
terrestrial systems are predominantly farmed systems with food
crops being planted, tended and harvested;
terrestrial systems use domesticated plant and animal species;
aquatic systems generally harvest wild species; 6 max
Expression of ideas [2 max]
[20]
20
succession e.g. temperate forest development;
6 max
Award [1] for definition, [1] for example and [1] for a diagram
of each process.
21
(b) food production system e.g. intensive wheat production;
natural ecosystem e.g. deciduous woodland;
22
(b) Award [1] each for two of the following.
environmental pressures (e.g. predation, climate);
act on variations within a population (e.g. size, colour, resistance to disease);
to change the frequency of genetic traits/genes in a population;
where this reaches the point that the forms cannot interbreed,
speciation has occurred; 2 max
Any other appropriate point.
23
(b) low total numbers/long or complex migration route/specialised
habitat/specialised food sources/widely hunted or otherwise
used by humans/low reproduction rate/large number of
predators/susceptibility to disease/limited distribution/
catastrophe such as flooding or meteor impact;
any other reasonable points; 2 max
Responses need two factors per mark.
Factors must be specific to extinction of organisms. No credit for
vague answers such as “global warming” or “degradation of
environment”.
(c) endangered:
species in danger of becoming extinct in the immediate future
because their numbers have declined to a critical level;
extinct:
species believed to no longer exist alive; 2 max
(e) (i) [1] for name, [1] for brief description e.g.
Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia;
tropical savanna with extensive wetlands; 2 max
24
(ii) Any reasonable examples, but must have some evaluation
for full [5] marks.
For above example:
measures:
designation as World Heritage Area by UNESCO;
involvement of Aboriginal people in management;
concentration of visitor pressure, campsites, into limited areas;
strict protection of flora and fauna by law;
international agreements with Japan, China to protect migratory
birds;
attempts to eliminate introduced species; 3 max
evaluation:
considerable success, as measured by visitor numbers;
and protection of habitats and biodiversity;
success due to use of modern scientific techniques and
traditional land management;
and due to use of local, national and international measures; 2 max
25
(b) Answers only need to show one advantage and one disadvantage
for each of the listed approaches to conservation. 6 max
Advantage Disadvantage
Zoos controlled breeding; problems reintroducing
allow for research; animals to wild;
allow for education; prisons for animals;
extreme protection for sends wrong message –
individuals; “we don’t need to worry”;
tend to favour “popular”
animals;
small genetic pool;
Creation of conserves whole difficult to manage;
reserves or ecosystem; very expensive;
protected areas prevents hunting;
protects from humans;
Convention on signed by many countries; difficulty enforcing treaty;
International Trade protects many species; many countries have not
in Endangered signed it;
Species (CITES) implementation varies from
country to country;
26
(c) lack of international agreements;
regular hunting at any point in life cycle;
need for conservation in breeding and wintering areas
(and between them);
unpredictable losses due to hazards on long migration routes; 2 max
Credit any reasonable answer.
[5]
27
(c) arguments for zoos
individual organisms are protected in a controlled environment;
education of public through visits may make them more likely
to support conservation campaigns;
genetic monitoring can take place;
captive breeding enables higher rates of reproductive success;
benefit of artificial insemination;
number of offspring surviving to adulthood is higher so species
numbers increase more effectively;
studying species so understanding improves, helping management
outside zoos;
holding species while habitats are restored;
arguments against zoos
ethical arguments against keeping animals
in captivity for profit;
conserving species is just used as an excuse;
poor conditions or treatment in zoos leading to physiological and
psychological problems with the animals;
captive animals unable to adapt to life back in the wild;
small genetic pool; 6 max
personal justification (needs to be more than just arguments for
or against);
Expression of ideas [3 max]
[20]
28